"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

The Odyssey (2026)

THE ODYSSEY. Good movie. Christopher Nolan (executive producer: ZACK SNYDER’S JUSTICE LEAGUE) gives us his take on the ancient poem, as filtered through his heavy duty filmatism, shot on IMAX film, with some of his beloved non-linear structure, a ridiculously stacked cast and a weird Ludwig Göransson (THE TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN) score. It’s classic Nolan material but with the welcome addition of some monsters and horror, because it’s set in “a time of apparent magic.”

Nolan has joined the category of Spielberg and Eastwood, where I’ll see anything he makes and know I’ll probly like it even if it’s something I wouldn’t otherwise be interested in. Even if it seems like homework. Obviously THE ODYSSEY sounds like more of a popcorn movie than DUNKIRK or OPPENHEIMER, but I sure do feel like I’m supposed to already have opinions about Homer and epic poems. By the time I saw the movie the discourse revolved around a lengthy takedown in the London Review of Books by classicist Emily Wilson, whose 2017 translation Nolan cites as an influence. But even regular movie critics seem to be full of thoughts about The Odyssey and The Iliad and what not.

This is all valuable, but I must say up front that I have none of that background. Instead I come to THE ODYSSEY as someone who actually liked the remake of CLASH OF THE TITANS and paid to see such Fantasy Sword Dude movies as KING ARTHUR: LEGEND OF THE SWORD, BEOWULF (in IMAX 3D), CONAN THE BARBARIAN 2011, HERCULES 2014, WARCRAFT, GODS OF EGYPT, and IN THE LOST LANDS, as well as Elevated Fantasy Sword Dude movies THE GREEN KNIGHT and THE NORTHMAN. And I enjoyed most of those. Not to brag.

Nolan’s Batman past and A+-lister production values can’t help but radiate summer blockbuster energy, even if his intentions lean closer to those last two on my list. He scratches some of that sword and sorcery itch while giving us a little more. It has more coherent things to say about the world than most of his movies, but thankfully it never feels like it’s saying, “Gather ‘round, I have some things to say about the world.”

It’s the most all-star cast since… well, OPPENHEIMER. (There hasn’t been an EXPENDABLES in a while.) It would be easier to just list the actors who aren’t in it: Mads, Joel Edgerton, Eric Bana, that’s about it. Snoop Dogg. Otherwise it’s all of ‘em. Everybody from John Leguizamo to Travis Scott to Mia Goth to Corey Hawkins to Logan Marshall-Green to James Remar (to name just some of the ones I don’t remember seeing in the trailers).

Matt Damon (TITAN A.E., SPIRIT: STALLION OF THE CIMARRON, HAPPY FEET TWO) stars as Odysseus, the king of Ithaca. But the movie starts at his castle after he’s been gone for 20 years, so we only hear people glorifying him in psalm to his son Telemachus (Tom Holland, LOCKE). This guy doesn’t even remember his dad, but swears he’s coming back soon, and loves hearing endless stories about how fucking awesome he was, how he had this incredible bow and arrow trick, and nobody else could even string the bow. And he won the Trojan War with that horse gimmick, and all that. What a man. What a hero. What a legend.

And what a deadbeat? His old palace is a sad scene. The son dwelling on a past he doesn’t even know, his poor mom Penelope (Anne Hathaway, HOODWINKED!) still hurting, acting crazy, perpetually stalling so she doesn’t have to choose one of the young whippersnappers trying to get in her pants/his throne, providing bottomless food and drink and shelter to a mob of rowdy suitors, especially Antinous (Robert Pattinson, COSMOPOLIS). He’s a comically sniveling character, which is important because he’s obviously right that it’s pathetic for Telemachus to be so obsessed with a guy he’s never met. Get some hobbies, kid. Before Antinous is a confirmed bastard it seems like this could be an Iceman-in-TOP-GUN type move where he’s correct but acts like such a dick you’re tricked into thinking you disagree with him.

The thing about Odysseus, he left for the Trojan War, which was long and difficult, but won like ten years ago. Before the journey home his group split from Agamemnon (Benny Safdie, LICORICE PIZZA), a fancy lad with the fuckin Lamborghini Countache of armor – smooth, black, helmet looking like a Batman mask on the front, mohawk plume on the top, gold spinal column on the back. That guy didn’t make it back either. But some of them did, with bits of information. But without knowing for sure it’s easy to assume he either got squooshed by a giant or found a nice little place to settle in and start over.

Telemachus wants to find him, so he sneaks off with his trainer Mentor (Ryan Hurst, THE POSTMAN) and guidance from his father’s loyal swineherd Eumaeus (John Leguizamo, SPAWN). He meets with the king of Sparta, Menelaus (Jon Bernthal, THOSE WHO WISH ME DEAD) and his scarred wife Helen of Troy (Lupita Nyong’o, NON-STOP), but they don’t know what happened to Odysseus either.

I do! He’s alive on an island with new lady friend Calypso (Charlize Theron, THE HUNTSMAN: WINTER’S WAR) until he remembers “oh shit, I forgot to go home!” In mythology he’s been enchanted by a nymph and has to escape, but as presented in the movie he seems like a fuckin fool to give up a mellow life eating flowers on the beach with Charlize Theron. Seems way better than that dreary palace. But he wants to be with Penelope and he also has a pretty fuckin good revenge plan. If you seek revenge in real life you should dig two graves, but if you do it in a movie or epic poem I will add two stars to its rating.

In his memories Odysseus bravely leads his crew through a series of encounters, constantly questioned by his second-in-command Eurylochus (Himesh Patel, DON’T LOOK UP), who sometimes seems like the voice of reason, sometimes kind of an asshole who gets them in trouble with various gods. That’s if you believe in ‘em – the only one we see is Athena (Zendaya, SUPER BUDDIES), but only Odysseus ever sees her, so take from that what you will. They also believe they get attacked by Poseidon, but they never see Liam Neeson. Just waves and shit. Normal boat hazards. I’m skeptical about their interpretation. Obviously Nolan doesn’t show Zeus; having worked with the late Tommy “Tiny” Lister on THE DARK KNIGHT, he’d never recast.

On the other hand there’s a really cool, weird monster that snatches some of them. And a scene where they plug their ears with wax to avoid hearing the songs of some sirens they have to pass. I didn’t really understand why Odysseus insisted on hearing it, strapped to the mast for safety. Just showing off, I guess. I like that the minor character of Anchialus (Will Yun Lee, TORQUE) decides to listen too, gets an ear boner and swims happily toward the sirens. I don’t know if he had the best weekend of his life or got fucked to death on a pile of seals. Nolan couldn’t specify because it’s PG-13. even with an R-rating.

One of the best sections is definitely the one about the cyclops (Bill Irwin, POPEYE). They’re starving and see a sheep, but Odysseus says not to kill it, to follow it to the herd. They do, but it goes into a fucking cave. Do not follow a sheep into a cave, in my opinion. Then they get in there and find bags of cheese hanging from the wall. He tastes it, says it’s pretty good. Cave cheese! I wouldn’t do it.

Anyway, the cyclops comes home from work, an homage to the scene in CABIN BOY where Mike Starr as the giant catches Nathaniel Mayweather fuckin his wife, Calli. Most of this is obviously based on CABIN BOY (even some goofy shots with giant practical hands) though Nolan sadly did not feel ready to tackle the mythology of Chocki the half man/half shark. But the cyclops is a great creation with a (digitally?) mixed up face, designed more like an abstraction than a monster. And with humanizing touches like normal hairy legs and back acne. Late in their encounter they realize that he is an intelligent being with language, but Odysseus talks anybody out of trying to reason with him, and also turns into a fuckin yahoo and fires an unnecessary arrow at him after they escape. I do not support his actions, but I do support the scene.

The other episode that has stuck with me most is when Odysseus’s starving crew come across the cabin of Circe (Samantha Morton, JOHN CARTER) and she offers them a meal. She assumes they’re there to rape her, which they swear they aren’t, but she still takes revenge by using magic to make them voraciously slurp down piles of gut-noodles, and then with her hands molding their flesh into the shape of pigs. It’s some spectacularly imaginative FX and one of those moments where I’m not sure if the movie understands how much I’m gonna side with her but I’m gonna do it anyway. It doesn’t seem like they would’ve harmed her, but I got the idea from other scenes that they did their share of savagery in the war, as she assumed. So I can’t really get mad at her extreme methods of justice.

When the movie really started to surprise me was when we started to see the whole Trojan Horse incident from Odysseus’s perspective. I mean yes, we all know the story, what a clever ruse, and if I understand correctly in this version they made a beautiful horse sculpture out of their own shipwreck? Incredible work. But when it got to “we had to sit in that thing for days and people died and rotted at the bottom in our shit and piss” I thought “Oh wow, I never thought of it that way.” And we learn of Odysseus’s guilt over leaving a young soldier next to the horse, not knowing they were inside, as part of the plan. Poor Sinon (Elliot Page, WHIP IT) confronts him in Hades about the betrayal. And most mindblowing to me was the realization that jesus christ, what a fucked up thing to do! Yeah, what a clever trick they used to go in and massacre a people! A major theme is that Odysseus believes in “Zeus’s law” of always being a good host and a good guest, so he understands how deeply dishonorable it was to pretend to give a gift of peace as a way to wage war. I mean, I don’t generally think about the Trojan War, so maybe this old hat to others, but it’s not an angle I’d heard or thought of.

The aforementioned translator discourse was honestly a relief, because before the movie came out everybody was stuck responding to the idiotic grievances of the usual culture war dumbfucks, figureheaded by the actual richest man in the world, an apartheid-raised bigot who bought Twitter to turn it into a broken neo-nazi chat room and anti-immigrant riot starter. As usual he was apoplectic that there are some actors in the movie who are (gasp, puke, piss, sob, jerk it) not white. That’s very upsetting to gutter racist scum who believe that movies about ancient history aren’t “accurate” if they don’t use the Hollywood shorthand of white people speaking English in English accents.

The real flashpoint is Lupita Nyong’o as “most beautiful woman in the world” Helen Troy. If you don’t see how Lupita Nyong’o fits that bill that’s on you, buddy! That’s a you problem. After seeing the movie, of course, I recognize that the real issue is giving such a brilliant actress such a small role without much to work with. (I could say the same of Mia Goth [A CURE FOR WELLNESS], though there’s a moment where she gets to go 60% Goth. Lupita gets one too, when she stabs her husband. Spoiler.)

Anyway, according to the celebrity bigots (both the true believers and the grifters), the casting of THE ODYSSEY is an attack on western values or some shit. Musk promised to use A.I. to create his own “accurate” movie of the poem, and for once I wish he actually had follow through on these kinds of threats, because it would be really funny for his suck ups to force themselves to sit through right wing grievance slop and convince themselves they like it better than a Christopher Nolan movie.

Ironically, though, I think the international society of absolute dumbfucks were kinda right to be offended by THE ODYSSEY. Most of them are too bad at watching movies to know it, but it genuinely is an attack on their chauvinistic belief system. Prince Apartheid was hurtt to know there’s a Black woman in a movie, but he probly had no idea it would also dismantle his anti-immigrant hatred. It presents “hospitality” as a religious requirement of Zeus-worshippers, which also happens to align with how Christians are supposed to treat immigrants and the poor. It’s true in the movie as well as in our society that many dumb assholes flagrantly violate the teachings of their loudly professed religions, and meanwhile many of us non-believers actually do care about that shit, because we have morals.

This is a movie about people worried that “sea people” will invade their lands while they’re invading other people’s lands from the sea. Nolan’s aging Odysseus recognizes that. He has the legendary feats and hubristic failures of all mythical heroes, but also enough self reflection to have regrets and changes of heart. And going through this journey with him makes him a little stronger when he becomes an action hero at the end, enacting a revenge plan with the showmanship and trickery of the dark knight (but the extremism of Bane). I doubt the ending’s similarities to THE DARK KNIGHT RISES are an accident.

If I had to choose one Fantasy Sword Dude type movie that balances pulpiness with serious-mindedness while simultaneously reveling in and critiquing the avenging warrior mentality of its hero, I would probly have to go with THE NORTHMAN. I just love its raw barbarianism presented at face value and trusting the viewer to make their own judgments. That speaks to me artistically. But fuck it, I want both movies. I’m taking both. THE ODYSSEY is a fun time to watch and then to chew on in your mind. Unlike Odysseus, I’m glad I took the journey.

 

p.s. Seattle’s true IMAX theater was recently bought by the Space Needle owners, and they only use it to show a documentary about Dale Chihuly to bored tourists. A war crime on the level of the Trojan Horse fiasco. But I was at least able to see THE ODYSSEY in 70mm, which was pretty cool.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 5th, 2026 at 3:43 pm and is filed under Reviews, Fantasy/Swords. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

27 Responses to “The Odyssey (2026)”

  1. Excellent “No Holds Barred” reference!

  2. wilson’s criticism was written in good faith and merits being engaged with in kind; i’m not on elon musk’s or jack dorsey’a social media platforms but what little bits of discussion i’ve seen about her london review piece now seem to have devolved into whether she breached decorum or is biting the hand that feeds her, which is idiotic. i thought her take on how sympathetically nolan portrays odysseus was a major misread, to the point where i wasn’t sure whether i correctly parsed what she was saying on the matter? nolan isn’t a subtle filmmaker, and odysseus’ constant surprise that the strangers he encounters didn’t get the memo about xenia feels like a simpsons running gag for all the work it does to underline his blundering naivete in the face of alien cultures.

    also i’m going to be disappointed if “zeus’ law” fully supplants the word “xenia” in people’s minds. it’s a great word, rolls off the tongue, and i have no doubt nolan has seen Gummo so he knows it’s familiar to modern four quadrant audiences who have all also seen Gummo, right? right.

    to anyone who enjoyed the circe scenes i’d highly recommend madeline miller’s novel Circe as a fun modern subversion of this story. this is incredibly tangential but vern mentioned revenge plots in his review, and i’ve been meaning to get a gauge from the other readers of this site – did aleshea harris’ film Is God Is cross people’s radars at all? outside of tv ads during basketball playoffs and an episode of the Too Scary, Didn’t Watch podcast covering it, i wouldn’t have been aware of it. i went into it not knowing it was a revenge thriller, which is not really a genre i seek out, and it’s not a pleasant watch but felt unique to me given the people behind and in front of the camera.

  3. Saw it, dug it, agree with much of the above review. I was a kid obsessed with the stories of greek mythology (before I got into cool dude shit like comics and D&D) and I agree that the portrayal of the Trojan Horse as a fucked-up “we won the battle but lost ourselves” kind of move was surprising and really worked for me.

    Though the person sitting to my left was audibly snickering through the whole 3 hours, so, you know, I guess “opinions vary” as the man said.

    Some random thoughts (SPOILERS):

    Two movies that came into my head a lot were TIME BANDITS (for the visual style) and MONTY PYTHON AND THE HOLY GRAIL, for all the scenes where Odysseus and co stride out onto a new island, swords drawn, only to turn tail and run back for the boats. “Run awaaaay!” Possibly not references Nolan had in mind but there you go.

    I dug the bow stringing trick and yeah, it was pretty satisfying to watch Odysseus slaughter those dudes at the end, and it’s true to the source material from what I remember, but in the context of the movie it somewhat undermined Odysseus’ regret over the sack of Troy. I guess between the horse and the end of the movie our dude has had 10 years to work his way back to a little cool ass violent revenge, but still.

    Finally, sometimes I did understand where my snickering neighbor was coming from – some of the dialogue is hella corny. Any time someone is saying the words “our civilization” out loud and in all seriousness is a time the screenwriter should probably think twice. Maybe this is part of what Dr Wilson was so burned up about. I partway agreed with many of her critiques but still liked it overall. Unlike OPPENHEIMER which to me felt like a mostly great 2-hour movie completely undermined by its final act (after watching a dude invent the tech to destroy the world, it was hard to get upset over how unfair it was that he got his top secret clearance revoked), this felt like so much movie that anything subpar just got absorbed by the rest. And the flashback to the sack of Troy was powerful. Good movie! And when you think about it, it’s worth celebrating that Nolan is out there making frankly weird movies on an epic scale that are crowd-pleasing blockbusters.

  4. I think I’m done with Nolan. No hard feelings or anything. I’ve eventually grown to kind of like most of his movies to one degree or another, and at least one of them I think is pretty great (INCEPTION). But for me he’s like, I don’t know, Pearl Jam. Pearl Jam drops their first album, you’re like, hey, what an interesting sound. So different than the other stuff that’s been coming out. More stripped down and serious, no keyboards or spandex pants. And you dig that sound for a few albums. You want to hear it applied to different songs. But then a decade or two goes by and it kind of starts to sound like Pearl Jam is just going to keep making the same album forever. They call it different names, but the sound is the same. And you’re kind of sick of it. You’ve heard this sound before, and with every new album it feels a little more routine. You still like the songs you like, but you don’t necessarily need to hear any more of them. You’re even starting to miss those keyboards and spandex pants. At least they were fun, right? Why so serious?

    Anyway, I’m glad somebody gets to make exactly the movies they want to make at exactly the scale they want to make them and for some reason they’re all big hits despite being big gray blobs of okayness to my eyes. I wouldn’t have picked Nolan to be the one bulletproof filmmaker in this modern cinematic hellscape but it could be worse.

    In any case, I am happy to be able to stay out of whatever bad faith debate these pathetic shitheads are forcing on the rest of us. They have to come up with these dickbrained takes because they can’t engage with any substantive work of narrative art on its own terms, due to the fact that every single story ever told is about how people like them suck shit. Much easier to complain about casting and “historical accuracy” than to admit that every movie you’ve ever loved thinks you’re an asshole.

  5. The whole “discourse” about the casting was kinda weird to me. I mean, sure, that you have the usual Nazi assholes complaining about certain actors because they only want blond, blue-eyed Übermen on their screen, was to be expected. But it was odd how many of the same people who fought for decades against whitewashing in Hollywood and were for example really vocal about their anger at Ridley Scott over casting Christian Bale as Moses (And his really badly worded “Hollywood wouldn’t let me cast Mohammed Soandso in such an expensive movie” defense), were suddenly telling people, many of them Greek, to shut the fuck up over the casting of Matt Damon, because this is a fantasy movie and not a documentary.

    More amusing is however how Christopher Nolan has gained through the years such a reputation as anti-CGI guy, with how he always talked about the practical FX in his movies, that now, that he actually tries really hard to explain that he used tons of CGI in this movie, always has in his previous movies and keeps crediting the VFX crew that worked on this one, his fans won’t believe him. (Have you seen the “lifesized animatronic cyclops”? It was really just a cheesy looking marionette that was used as reference point for actors and VFX crew.)

  6. @Mr_Majestyk another universal release from a couple months ago and one of the better films i’ve seen this year, minions 3, establishes a nice bit of corporate synergy by opening with the minions antagonizing the cyclops for a few minutes, priming its intended audience for this film. the dark knight is old enough to vote this year and since then nolan has given us backwards time stunts, physically re-created nuclear detonation tests at scale, and now shoved a 60-foot (grey) puppet in a greek cave for the purpose of then tracing over it with cgi. he may not be working with a wide palette but from a standpoint of pure spectacle he’s still making some wild impractical choices and pulling them off practically and i don’t get the impression he isn’t having fun with it

  7. Thank you, Vince. Always nice when someone with the words writes what I’m thinking. My kids are huge Nolan fans, and verbally waterboards me from time about my luke warm relationship with his movies. It’s not that I don’t like them, but each time a new one comes out, I’ve seen at least two old movies and three TV shows telling the same story. And the Nolan fans’ defence is always the old Spinal Tap quote: But this one goes to eleven!

  8. So-and-so: Like I said, he’s doing exactly what he wants to do exactly how he wants to do it. He’s clearly having a blast. I just don’t think that fun translates to the screen. For all the production value he musters on set and the technical skill he employs to capture it, I rarely get any sense of awe or excitement from his films. His spectacle is inert, his action perfunctory, his drama breathless but hollow. He’s good at generating a feeling of anticipation, a building tension at the prospect of something amazing lurking just around the corner. It makes his movies engaging on a moment-to-moment basis, and that’s not nothing. But then we turn that corner and it’s the dullest possible execution of an ostensibly thrilling concept. The making-of stories are always better than the sequences themselves. You hear about all the practical effects on set, the elbow grease put into capturing them the old fashioned way, the Herculean efforts his team puts into using the most unwieldy cameras on earth to capture the grandest possible image, and the actual gray, unenthusiastically staged footage that ends up in the movie can’t help but be a letdown. When he couldn’t find a single visually or conceptually dynamic thing to do with the backwards action of TENET, I knew he was just never going to put all that money and effort up on the screen in a way that gives me the buzz I require.

  9. I liked it. Not as much as some of his other movies, but I was entertained for 3 hours.

    The only thing I didnt care much for was the staging of the action in the final scenes when Odysseus battles all the suitors. I found the action very confusing and not very engaging. I’m
    Not sure if it’s the limitations of the imax camera or just Nolan doesn’t have a feel for that type of action? Maybe he wanted it to be confusing?

  10. I was waiting for this review ever since I saw the movie this weekend, and I think what’s impressive here is that Nolan was able to capture so much of the poem while also fitting in his own obsessions and themes.

    I agree that people arguing over the Emily Wilson takedown is much preferrable to the racist chuds complaining behind their keyboard. But I also didn’t think her review was very good. I mean, she starts off with a tone of casual dismissal, which as someone who has worked with academics for too long, is de rigueur for scholars when a work of popular art is boorishly elbowing its way into their area of expertise. She spends way too much time contrasting the poem with Nolan’s film, which doesn’t seem important to the larger point she wants to make. And then when she does make her main point, she does something else that academics tend to do when writing about works of popular culture for a general audience: she complains about the contradictions in the film. For me, the point of artistic work are those contradictions. A film, novel, or poem is not an essay.

    Reading Wilson’s essay, I actually thought of Vern’s In Praise of Peaceful Notions in Violent Movies, which does a great job of explaining why ideological tension in film is often so appealing.

    But I’m glad that Nolan gets to do his thing. I’m not a Nolan fanboy, but I am a fan of auteur getting big checks to do what the want. He also seems like the kind of chill bloke you could hang out with and watch the Fast and the Furious series with.

  11. Ben C.–When leaving the theater, I absolutely made a joke to my wife that they should have used the Monty Python “Run awaaay!” whenever Odysseus and his men fled yet another island.

  12. You ever think how much of a coincidence it is that Odysseus went on the Odyssey?

  13. Not really, Jeff, but naming a mentor character “Mentor” is seriously lazy Marvel style humor IMO.

  14. I have to admit that if he’s pissing off racist asshats then Nolan must be doing something right. And there’s a part of me that’s curious about how much Pattinson can do to bring his TENET energy to this.

    BUT I saw OPPENHEIMER and I have to accept that Nolan is not interested in making films for me. I fell for the hype then, but I’ll not get fooled this time.

  15. I really enjoyed this review, not only for the glimpse at a bit of resurgent take-no-shit-off-fools TELL’S IT LIKE IT IS Vern in addressing and dispatching the deplorable hot takes, but also (especially) for making me actually want to see a movie for which the cultural hype/discourse had completely turned me off wanting to see.

    Not to “Tell em, Steve-Dave!” off of Majestyk’s comment, but I have a very hard time getting excited for big Hollywood cast movies anymore, especially Nolan’s. I enjoyed what he did his Batman movies and most of the movies he did before and during the Batman era, but as soon as he got his blank check, and could do what he wanted, I realized that what he wanted to do was make big swiss clock engineered spectacle movies with Today’s Hottest Actors, and I got annoyed feeling like I was supposed to enjoy these movies more than I did. They just don’t add up to anything fun for me. The whole online hype movement around his movies being “Important Art but also Blockbuster” and some kind of male entertainment ideal for influencers ruined their appeal even more. This is also how I feel about Tarantino at this time- I liked these filmmakers a lot more before they were given enough rope to make a career out of spelunking their own rectums instead of having to adapt their sensibilities for something less auteur. Like Sick Boy said, you’ve got it, then at some point you lose it, and it’s gone forever. All walks of life.

    Also good for Lupita Nyong’o and Elliott Page for getting work despite the seething of shitheads, but their inclusion does nothing for me. The identity politics at play (through no fault of their own) only detract from my suspension of disbelief, already strained by seeing a full cast of GQ photoshoot actors squinting their way through promos. While I’m here, I’m good on seeing Zendaya and her husband for a while. Racial and gender diversity is great, but can we get some diversity not seeing the same actors pop up in everything? Market your movie to whomever you think is most likely to buy a ticket, but if you want my money, give me some slightly less overexposed actors and less of this iMpOrTaNt ePiC Oscar bait hype. That might be an impossible task and outside of a filmmaker’s control in the current timeline, so they should probably not worry about what I want, and I should probably just wait for the DVD so I can evaluate it on it’s merits without all my baggage. I still haven’t done the OPPENHOMEWORK yet though so maybe it’s just time to drop this course.

  16. It is cool that he used the characters who the words odyssey and mentor come from, since of course he created the word protagonist in the movie TENET.

  17. Lovely review! Besides that insane “I’m going to make my own Odyssey. With Racism. And AI.” tantrum, let’s not forget that the auteur Musk has championed the most lately… is Uwe Boll. I really do hope he gives Boll millions to make his own The Odyssey and see what comes out, but lets be real, Musk is too much of a coward to ever throw his hat in the ring.

    Minor pedantic correction: Agamemnon does make it back home from Troy, he just gets killed by his wife and her lover before Telemachus gets there.

    Like others here, I run hot and cold on Nolan; I think he’s a director who’s desperate to demonstrate how clever and important his movies are, and generally they don’t feel all that clever or important to me. No matter – I’m happy he gets to do his thing, and I got a DUNKIRK out of it. DUNKIRK fucking rocks.
    This one was I thought was all right; even though a lot of it dragged, I found a lot to like, and overall it left a positive impression. Loved the beginning: Nolan’s asynchronic storytelling tricks are old hat by now, but they work really well at making exposition engaging because it makes you feel you’re working things out yourself. I especially liked the little stings he did inserting (sometimes repeated) fragments of the scenes he was about to return to. Again, seen it before, but here they felt like a attempt to do poetry on a visual medium. I also really liked the goings on at Circe’s cabin and the land of the dead. And the reframing of Odysseus’s belated comeback as the results of PTSD/a major guilt trip; It’s a revisionist reading, sure, but it feels supported by the original.

    A lot of the movie, though, felt to me like missed opportunities. Some of it is that, well, he can only cram so much stuff in there: the sirens, Charybdis, and especially Calliope felt extremely perfunctory. Some of it is my own taste (I didn’t care much for this interpretation of the Cyclops, or the events in his cave.)
    But my main issues are complaints I’ve had with Nolan’s stuff from the beginning… especially when there’s action involved. I was primed for the suitor fight, but it ended up boring me to tears. If Nolan’s going to insist on having long, involved action sequences in his films, maybe he could get a second unit director who gets action cinema. I also found that while I liked some of what it was going for, it was almost impossible for me to care about any of the characters. The closest I got to an emotional response to the movie was the dog. Flashbacks to the fate of the protagonist’s wife in Inception, which is devastating in concept, but then you watch the execution and shrug. Or at least I did. I just don’t connect at all to the way Nolan does fights or emotional beats.

    In conclusion, I did enjoy it with some caveats, and I have this feeling it will probably be better than the one Grok or Uwe Boll would come up with if Elon Musk had any balls to follow through on his xitterings.

  18. Calypso, not Calliope.

  19. Hilariously one of those Grok AI odyssey clips made a very realistic cyclops… with two eyes.

  20. “For all the production value he musters on set and the technical skill he employs to capture it, I rarely get any sense of awe or excitement from his films. His spectacle is inert, his action perfunctory, his drama breathless but hollow.”

    Mr. Majestyk hits it right on the head with this when it comes to most of my criticisms of Nolan and his larger scale films – THE ODYSSEY is not a film that gleams with the numinous, the wondrous, the magical. Not that it lacks visual beauty: many of the shot are gorgeous seascapes in particular. But it’s not numinous – ‘having a strong spiritual, holy, or religious quality that makes you feel awe and wonder.’ All of his blockbusters are like this, they lack for something more than just pretty spectacle. I think some of this comes down to Nolan’s lack of sophisticated visual storytelling – he just isn’t very proficient in the ‘grammar’ of good visual storytelling. I mean he pans the camera once! in BATMAN BEGINS. His films are full of basic shots, compositions, blocking, framing, simple use of cameras (which I think comes down to the cumbersomeness of the giant IMAX cameras he uses.) And ironically, he’s actually improved a bit as a basic visual storyteller since he switched to the IMAX cameras. The other big issue with his films in IMAX is the ‘giant’ aspect of the frame. Everything (even the quiet, small moments) come off as huge, which means that psychologically the viewer ‘perceives’ everything as being equal. This is compounded by his terrible sound mix and crazed reliance on booming, bombastically loud music scores. Everything is loud, big, important, sweeping etc. Nothing is contemplative, reflective, quiet, slow or subtle. I think this weakness of Nolan’s is also why he doesn’t portray the gods in the film, he just doesn’t have the chops to go down that path. To me this is by far the biggest tonal weakness of the movie, for crimes sake the gods are integral to the story.

    I mean Nolan has an average shot length of 3.1 seconds, the same hyperkinetic speed as Michael Bay. What is he hiding from us with all the quick cutting?: https://vashivisuals.com/average-shot-length-of-6-famous-directors-christopher-nolan-and-more/

    Moviewise has perhaps the most concise video picking apart the failings that are rampant in Nolan’s directing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0gZKgRpAoc

    I mean oh boy when he puts him up against Scorcese it’s bad, very bad. And then he uses a rack focus shot from OPPENHEIMER and compares it to the most basic shot Spielberg has ever filmed and it’s even uglier.

    Patrick H. Willems has an excellent video essay about Nolan:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v92uAesOimQ

    I’m not gonna get into much of a discussion on the merits of his translation of the literary work itself, except to say that I think Nolan’s a tough enough person to weather any criticism by Emily Wilson etc. She after all is an actual real expert on the work and more than entitled to her well earned opinion. I read her translation (as well as the Robert Fagles one) and found it impressive. But all translator’s (literary or film) bring their own interpretations and ideas, and if THE ODYSSEY really is as timeless and triumphant as it is supposed to be (it is,) than surely it can speak for every person and age in which a new version is created. After all, variety is the spice of life.

    However I kept wondering what the film would have been like if Odysseus had been more of a bastard and at least some of the suitors had been actually decent dudes. Might have added some depth to some of the conundrums faced by the characters.

    And Nolan has managed to get 60 million+ people (so far based on ticket sales) into a theatre to watch a 3 hour movie based on a 5000 year old poem, translated books of the film are sold out around the world. That’s a net positive as far as I’m concerned.

  21. Gotta echo Majestyk and pegsman’s comments here:

    I am kinda bemused that people are going into raptures over this. As a Nolan fan who mostly liked this movie while being aware of the stuff that didn’t quite work for me, people calling this “the best adaptation of Homer ever” and the “the best movie ever” is a head scratcher. Like, have you read the books? Is this your first exposure to Greek Mythology on screen?

    I loved the scale and spectacle of the action, Hathaway and Damon are both pretty good as is Leguizamo and Himesh Patil. It’s an action adventure that’s also deeply rooted in themes of loss and regret which Nolan (mostly) nails. And in the Circe scenes, Nolan goes full Body Horror which was a pleasant surprise.

    But it’s also somber, dour and drab, devoid of any elements of humor or wit which the Myths also had in abundance, to say nothing of the sex and incest which milquetoast Nolan generally steers clear of. On that note, this must be the tamest movie to receive an R-Rating. Hell, the Director’s Cut of TROY featured a far more brutal sacking of the city than what Nolan shows here.

    The biggest bug up my ass is how Nolan totally strips the Gods out of the narrative.

    In the original story, Odysseus doesn’t just wander around because he’s bad at directions; he’s tossed from island to island because Poseidon is furious, Athena intervenes, Hermes delivers messages, and Zeus occasionally decides to flex his authority. Remove the gods, and you’re left with a hollow travelogue about a stubborn sailor who can’t catch a break.

    The gods are not optional for me in Greek Mythology—they embody fate, hubris, justice, and the cosmic scale of human struggle. Without them, Odysseus is just a guy with bad luck and a long commute home. It’s infuriating, because the whole point of the epic is the tension between mortal will and divine interference. Strip that away, and you’ve gutted the myth into a bland survival drama ravaged with loss and regret. It’s like staging Hamlet without the ghost, or The Iliad without Achilles’ rage. You don’t modernize myth by amputating its soul.

    In a saga already stuffed with one‑eyed ogres, man‑eating giants, sirens crooning sailors to their doom, witches with a flair for curses, whirlpools eager to swallow ships whole, and rocky mountains that decide to get lively—why on earth would you cut the gods out? It’s like saying, “Yes, we’ve got monsters, magic, and myth, but let’s not bother with the divine chaos that actually makes it all tick.

    All so Nolan can frame Odysseus as a supremely skilled warrior adept at the art of warfare, afflicted with PTSD, who finally reaches home only to see it overrun with assholes who want to kill his son and bed his wife, and to set things right, he needs to revert back to the One Man Army Killing Machine he always was.

    Hell, replace the Trojan War with the Vietnam one, and Odysseus is John Rambo.

    A tortured protagonist archetype Hollywood has been shoving into our faces only for the last…I don’t know…half a century??

  22. “His spectacle is inert, his action perfunctory, his drama breathless but hollow.”

    Nailed it! With regards to his dramas being hollow, it’s because Nolan NEVER lets the emotional scenes breathe.

    Nolan’s pretty good at spectacle married to intricate Puzzle-Box style narratives. But when it comes to emotional scenes, the man fumbles like a virgin on his wedding night.

    Odysseus’ reunion with his dog Argus, which brought a lump to my throat even when I read the books (across 2 different translations), is a scene in the film that should have landed with more emotional heft. Something that a Spielberg or Peter Jackson could have aced in their sleep, Nolan hurries past like an embarrassed teenager who just caught his parents making out. To say nothing of Odysseus’ reunion with Penelope, something the entire movie has been building towards, that’s over in the blink of an eye, cut to them in a ship heading out to…exile (???)

    But INTERSTELLAR should have prepared me for this.

    After all of Matthew McConaughey’s tear and snot-filled wailing of “Murph! Murph! Murph! Don’t let me go Murph!”, we get the long awaited Father-Daughter reunion, only for Murph to tell her father “Nice seeing you, Dad. Now fuck off and start that Colony with Anne Hathaway”.

  23. @RBatty024 – in agreement with you that the Wilson discourse is at least good in that it’s engaging with the work itself, not some racist/misogynist/anti LGBTQ dogwhistle that most of the rest of the online discussion is – though I’ve not particularly loved how some of the Nolan fanboys have gone straight to the well of misogynist dismissivness in response to her.

    Having said all that, as another person who spent quite a bit of time in academia, I totally agree her criticisms read very much like offended academic. For my money she’s engaging in one of my least favourite approaches to critiquing a piece of art, which is criticizing it for failing to do what it doesn’t set out to do. She clearly has some very set views about what the themes of the Odyssey are, and despite (as an academic) knowing there are multiple interpretations around the themes, she just won’t get past him not exploring her interpretation of the themes in his film. I think it’s 100% worth her acknowledging up top that the isn’t in love with his interpretation of the themes, but once that’s out the way, she could have engaged with how well (or otherwise) he told the story HE was trying to tell. Instead, she just seems to refuse to get past the dislike of his approach and refuses to engage with whether the approach works on its own merits.

    It’s just so annoying coz it feels like sidestepping the films actual merits (or otherwise) to talk about something that matters to you.

  24. I’ll echo the above confusion at this adaptation’s rapturous reception. It’s not bad, exactly, but it feels overstuffed and bombastic; I read a review that compared the editing to early-2000s “previously on” TV recaps, and, yeah. That captures the feeling. The first two or so hours of the movie felt like an assault: just edit edit edit edit overlapping dialog jump cut jump cut voiceover.

    I can’t help but feel that the right-wing backlash is so abhorrent to left-leaning taste makers that they’re overcompensating, just so nobody thinks they’re doing a racism. Or maybe I’m missing something about the movie’s qualities.

    My wife likes but didn’t love the movie, my brother-in-law felt it was too slow and dull in the first half, and the stranger sitting next to us in the theater fell asleep halfway through. So at least don’t feel totally alone here.

  25. The strangest thing about the right wing grift war against this movie is some of them (especially Musk) declaring a CHRISTOPHER NOLAN movie would flop. Like mother of Christ, did they get drunk from going after easy prey like Supergirl?

    I mean if you’re pretentious, you could make a comp between them and the President’s ill-advised war with Iran.

  26. i just want to say i’m really appreciative of the level of discussion among the readers here on vern’s site, and to thank Mr. Majestyk for taking the time to elaborate on his thoughts about nolan. trying to recently engage with a Letterbox’d style crowd elsewhere about Disclosure Day – another film that is absolutely not above formalist reproach – was maddening to me when no greater criticisms could be mustered than “it’s cringe” or “it’s boomer.”

  27. Plastiquehomme–“For my money she’s engaging in one of my least favourite approaches to critiquing a piece of art, which is criticizing it for failing to do what it doesn’t set out to do.”

    I said something similar after first reading her essay. It’s like when a reviewer compares the film that was actually made with the version they have in their head. It turns out that the version of the film you made in your head is much better and thematically consistent.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>