"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Lee Cronin’s The Mummy

“What the fuck was our daughter doing in a 3,000 year old sarcophagus!?”

Yeah, I know, it’s real funny that LEE CRONIN’S THE MUMMY is called LEE CRONIN’S THE MUMMY. I’m not normal, so I saw that title and knew Lee Cronin was the director of an okay movie called THE HOLE IN THE GROUND (2019) that got him the job on EVIL DEAD RISE and now this is his third movie. Normal people see that title and think I don’t know who the fuck that is. So it’s funny that they wouldn’t let him just call his mummy movie THE MUMMY and made him put his name on it. This is true. But let’s move on.

Now, to the important business: this is a good movie! Research confirms it got mostly bad reviews, but I’m telling you, there are delights to be had here. I had heard people say it was more like an EVIL DEAD movie than a mummy movie, sometimes meaning that as a complaint, but obviously it’s a selling point for me. To me the worst EVIL DEAD movie (Lee Cronin’s) is better than the best modern mummy movie (the Tom Cruise one). But now this is the best modern mummy movie precisely because it uses some mummy tropes but with the energy, momentum, style and outrageousness of an EVIL DEAD. It’s very gross, it takes itself seriously but has a great sense of absurdity and dark humor, it has a momentum to it even though it’s over two hours. (I’m sure it helps that they have Bryan Shaw, editor of EVIL DEAD 2013, EVIL DEAD RISE and nine episodes of Ash vs. Evil Dead. Director of photography David Garbett is also a veteran of RISE and Ash vs.) LEE CRONIN’S THE MUMMY quite firmly fits into the spookablast category, so I recommend it to fellow aficionados of such blasts.

It’s the story of the Cannons, an American family living temporarily in Cairo, while the father Charlie (Jack Reynor, MIDSOMMAR) works as a correspondent for an English language news channel. He and his wife Larissa (Laia Costa, DUCK BUTTER) have to referee squabbles between their kids Katie (Emily Mitchell, WOMEN TALKING, PRISCILLA, THE APPRENTICE) and Sebastian (Dean Allen Williams, GOD’S NOT DEAD: IN GOD WE TRUST) and Larissa is pregnant and Charlie is trying to move up in his field and it’s all very exhausting, but they do it with love and humor.

But one day Katie is out playing in the garden, talking through the fence to a woman only credited as “The Magician” (Hayat Kamille, MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS). Katie is friends with her daughter Layla (Aisha Laouini) but now she’s talking to this weird lady and not sure what to make of her when the lady hands her a nectarine. And then an animated beetle crawls out of the fruit and into her mouth and it’s horror movie time.

We know from a prologue that The Magician has a normal family but she’s up to something weird in an underground pit with a small pyramid in it. So this can’t be good. Charlie sees his daughter being taken and gives chase, but loses her in a sandstorm (the one touch weirdly connecting this to those other two THE MUMMYs). The police are useless and infuriate him by implying he’s a suspect.

Eight years later Katie has not been found. The now-born youngest daughter, Maud (Billie Roy, SPIRIT HALLOWEEN: THE MOVIE) is about as old as she was when she was taken, while Sebastian has grown into a sullen teen (Shylo Molina, RUST). They all live in Albuquerque with their very Catholic, former hairdresser grandmother Carmen (Veronica Falcón, MIDAQ ALLEY). But things change because of a small plane crash in Egypt.

It’s fucked up. One of the passengers is found high up in a tree, impaled through the eye socket by a branch. Also in the wreckage is the ancient sarcophagus the plane was hauling. When authorities open it they find Katie (now played by young actress Natalie Grace), desiccated, catatonic and wrapped in strips of leather inscribed with words in a dead language. Which I imagine is unusual.

Missing persons Detective Dalia Zaki (May Calamawy, DJINN, Moon Knight), who originally got the case just because she knew English, calls and tells them they found Katie alive. When they get there they’re warned that her condition will be shocking. They are not warned that she has become Lee Cronin’s The Mummy, because this is the modern world. People don’t believe in mummies, and they don’t know who Lee Cronin is. (Okay, I take it back, it is worth joking about that title.)

So that’s the premise of this movie that is so entertaining: they bring home a literal monster, but it’s their daughter. She’s in a wheelchair, she doesn’t talk, they see her gnarled skin and thick, nasty toenails as health and grooming issues, not as monster features. They’re surely a little revolted by her, but they hide it well, like they should. Carmen wants to give her a makeover, even after the kid viciously headbutted her and bloodied her nose (man does this mummy love to headbutt).

They are increasingly confused by Katie’s bizarre actions, such as when she scurries around in the crawlspace and eats a scorpion, and when they try to yank it out of her throat she projectile pukes an impressive amount of green liquid. Sensing that this might be more than just malnutrition and trauma, Charlie uses his reporter skills to research what happened to her, and keeps in touch with Detective Zaki, also on the case. One of his biggest leads comes from when he realizes that Katie’s disturbing teeth clicking spells “LAYLA” in Morse code. This is an example of why I loved this movie. Such a crazy concept combined with a sound that’s just naturally, primally unnerving. Who would think to combine those things?

The siblings, especially Maud, are afraid of Katie. The parents tell them the right thing, that they need to accept their sister and try to support her, but they don’t see what the kids see. They don’t ever find out that Katie can suddenly talk and speaks to Maud through the door during a wake for their grandma and somehow reaches her tongue under the door to find out “how your little piggies taste,” the salive somehow possessing her and causing her to levitate. They do find out that Maud reaches into Grandma’s coffin, unthreads her mouth stitches and comes chomping at them wearing her false teeth. Also that she calls her teacher the c-word. This kid has a BABE movie poster in her room but in my opinion she is not currently behaving in a that’ll-do-pig-worthy manner.

Charlie notices the writing on the ribbons and brings them to be translated by an archaeology professor named Bixler (Mark Mitchinson, MORTAL ENGINES). I thought his voice sounded like an EVIL DEAD Kandarian expert, and then he plays an old recording with another EVIL DEAD professor type explaining the demon mythology! (Mitchinson was in both EVIL DEAD RISE and Ash vs. Evil Dead, but playing different types of characters.) They’re able to figure out some supernatural business while Detective Zaki tracks down The Magician and grown up Layla (May Elghety) and finds out even more.

Of the mummy movies I know, this is the one that most balances out the exoticism. I was struck by it opening with an Egyptian family joking around and singing an Arabic-language pop song together in the car. This will be the family shouldering the ancient curse that leads to turning Katie into Lee Cronin’s The Mummy, but even they are allowed to exist in the modern, rational world more than “the natives” usually are in this subgenre. The good guy Egyptian Detective Zaki doesn’t have a fez or a curved sword and is not part of ancient order, she wears a blazer and works in a big, impressive police headquarters. I know these are small things, but movies like this usually treat Egypt as a mystical kingdom trapped in time.

I found it very effective the way Cronin gives the Cannon family their quirks and humor (Sebastian using Katie’s doll to test his parachute, Charlie being self conscious about how he moves his hands on TV, Carmen baking cakes for every birthday Katie missed) despite the tragedy and horror. It provides a grounding humanity that makes the movie more watchable. It’s serious but not self-serious. There’s something relatable to me about a family struggling with something they’re not qualified for but not wanting to put their loved one in a facility, and Cronin has talked about writing this in response to his mother’s death. (Yeah, another one about grief.) Yet it’s not too grim for us to get some big, hearty laughs at how out of control things get (SPOILER example: when Katie throws Grandma out the window and she splatters on the front of the car and Katie is in the backseat giggling about it and then a bunch of coyotes run up and start tearing Grandma’s guts out like she’s Joe Pilato in DAY OF THE DEAD). Reynor and Costa are great, playing the emotions real but allowing for wide eyes signaling their awareness that this is some crazy shit.

Also it’s a monster movie with a good monster. Grace looks so weird and creepy (makeup designer: Liz Byrne, GRETEL & HANSEL, COCAINE BEAR, ABIGAIL, BLUE MOON, DROP), and she and her doubles (real and otherwise) do such a great job with the “erratic and extreme movements, repeating abrupt noises, and strange physical tics,” as the doctor put it. She gets up to such unexpected and disgusting trouble, it’s just a fun time watching her bug out. And I’m glad that someone in the world of horror understands that some of us still want to see them invent wild and spectacular new catastrophes to happen to bodies. If you have the budget to do it it’s almost your responsibility these days, and Lee Cronin is a responsible horror director. (People who notice split diopter shots and think there’s some kind of rule about how many you can put in one movie will disagree.)

I liked EVIL DEAD RISE, but I definitely underestimated Cronin. His first movie was more serious and didn’t make much of an impression on me, so I wasn’t sure how much I’d click with him when he wasn’t produced by Sam Raimi and going for an EVIL DEAD tone. But it turns out he can do something even better when James Wan asks him for his take on a mummy movie.

I look forward to LEE CRONIN’S THE SCORPION KING.

This entry was posted on Monday, October 12th, 2026 at 7:53 am and is filed under Reviews, Horror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

23 Responses to “Lee Cronin’s The Mummy”

  1. I believe you that it’s good, but I remember seeing the trailer, liking it for a minute and then instantly losing all excitement when they showed the kid do an Ace Ventura grimace, uhm, sorry, I mean of course a totally creepy, unsettling and not at all ridiculous evil grin. Can’t wait for the day when this trend dies out.

  2. Before Evil Dead Burn, I thought this was the best Evil Dead movie of the year. Bless that we get two killer movies in that same goopy disgusting vein in one year

  3. This one is a lot of fun. The dark humour helped a lot.

    I do wish it was a little shorter. It does feel a little too long.

  4. Lee Cronin making a movie to process the loss of his mother and then they made the title of it very close to LEE CRONIN”S MUMMY did make me giggle (sorry, Lee). I wish I had seen this on the big screen, I think it would have played better for me there. At home, I liked it’s tastelessness and brashness but it kinda ran the line where EVERYTHING went on just long enough to where it wore out its welcome, but not long enough to go around and be funny again.

    But I like the broad choices of the movie, with locales not normally associated with mummy movies ( instead of museums, pyramids, London) and doing a time jump for the family. I hope Calamawy returns as Detective Zaki, just develop her into this go to Van Helsing figure for mummies and other Egyptian horrors in other movies.

    The grandmother/coyote made me laugh too, and it’s not the only time I’ve had that laugh this year. SHELBY OAKS had a character fall out of a window only to be immediately set upon by canines too! It may have gotten a bigger laugh out of me there because it’s played dead serious.

  5. i mostly enjoyed this and the only thing i have to add is extremely nitpicky, but spain does an astoundingly poor job of standing in for albuquerque in this film. i’m unsure why they specified the US portions were set there

  6. I think the title is genius. They’re trying to will him into being a Wes Craven type “brand.” So, less savvy folks will be like “he must be a big deal,” and if he actually does rack up a track record for quality, then other stuff will be more identifiable and marketable—and faster. Think of how many quality horror directors languish in relative journeyman obscurity. So, why tf not?! If his movies suck, this makes less sense, of course.

  7. My favorite YouTube channel (Overly Sarcastic Productions, despite they’re title they’re very sincere about their analysis of narrative tropes and history) did a great video about the history of Mummies in pop culture, and they make a decent point that the original Universal Horror Mummy movies were more inspired by Dracula than anything else, so it’s not…COMPLETELY out of left field for one of these to be more inspired by other pop culture sources than strictly Mummy iconography.

  8. Fun fact one of the few hits WBD has this year and 2026 was dire for them right before the merger

  9. I want to meet the person who went and paid for this movie based on the Lee Cronin name.

    “It’s a Lee Cronin movie honey, I’m there opening night!”

    Anyways, it was a good movie. Well made. But I will probably never watch it again.

  10. Lee Cronin Presents Lee Cronin’s The Mummy:
    A Lee Cronin Joint.

  11. Well, JOHN CARPENTER’S HALLOWEEN (as the opening credits have it) was Carpenter’s third feature and first horror movie. So dare big I guess.

    Also, THE MUMMY is a title that’s already been used by several different unrelated famous mainstream movies – there’s the Boris Karloff one, the Brendan Fraser one, the Tom Cruise one, plus there was a Peter Cushing one in the 50s – so it makes sense to specify that it’s *this* person’s THE MUMMY. It would be funny if Cronin chose that title/concept specifically so he could apply that leverage to it: “Hey, I *have* to name it after myself, how else will audiences know it’s not the Tom Cruise one?”

  12. It’s pretty obvious that the title is a try to differentiate the movie from the Brendan Fraser ones. The newest sequel to that one was announced while Cronin’s movie was in production and with the backlash over the Tom Cruise movie for being a “bad remake”, they better played it safe. Although of course they could’ve just picked another title than THE MUMMY, but I guess that was a marketing decision to use a name that everybody knows while telling them that it’s something completely different at the same time.

  13. I believe I read somewhere that Cronin was actually mortified by the title choice. Feel free to fact-check me on this.

    There are plenty of other things they could have called this to distinguish from the other semi-recent MUMMY films, plus, I think the trailer sets pretty clear expectations that we won’t be seeing Tom Cruise or Rachel Weisz and her goofy brother in this one.

    I have not yet seen the film, but I’m now fully doubling down with a commitment to offering only unsolicited title choice analysis, commentary, debate, and general spreading of title-related speculation and misinformation in this thread.

  14. This was fine. However, like many of you, I keep reading this as Hume Cronyn’s The Mummy, and hope that it’ll turn out to be a Brewster’s Millions sequel! Alas.

  15. The title definitely damned the movie, even if it seems to have made decent money. Whatever the reason it’s called that– and I don’t fully buy it’s because people would think Universal was either making a belated sequel to or re-releasing their 9-year-old Dark Universe flop to theaters like it’s an old Disney cartoon coming back out of the vault– when you think about Lee Cronin’s The Mummy, you’ve got to deal with how weird that title is every time, even if just as an annoyed paragraph at the top of a positive review. And then there’ll be the retroactive weirdness if future Lee Cronin movies aren’t called “Lee Cronin’s _____” and we’re all left wondering what happened behind the scenes that Cronin’s no longer a name the studio’s pushing that hard.

    Personally, my problem is I kept thinking the film was directed by Leaky Ronin, an obscure member of the extended Wu-Tang universe (he parlayed features on some Cappadonna tracks to an album-length collaboration with U-God).

    My other problem with the movie, which I thought was maybe a B-/C+, is some real wimp stuff: The LC’sM posters and promo images I saw everywhere were of a dusty, possibly dead child screaming in pain and always made me think of footage I’ve seen of Gaza. That’s not the fault of Cronin, the studio or the marketing department. I don’t think the poster’s insensitive or ill-timed or anything and I don’t think they should have found a different way to promote the film. It’s entirely on my shoulders. I just cannot for the life of me look at that dead kid and real ones I’ve seen videos and pictures of.

  16. Lee Cronin’s Driving Miss Daisy. Coming in 2029!

  17. LC’s Mummy was the Poltergeist (1982) remake we never got, imho

  18. These are the mummies you need in your life.

  19. Imagine if everything about this film and its marketing were exactly the same, except the title was I WAS A TEENAGE MUMMY or HELP! MY DAUGHTER’S A MUMMY!, and somberly consider the mountains of cash they lost out on.

  20. Never saw this but at this point I’m just tired of spindly people doing body contortions as they add cracking noises on the soundtrack. It was awesome maybe 15 years ago, now it seems it pretty much defines horror movies.

  21. “the best modern mummy movie (the Tom Cruise one).”

    Sigh…Vern’s love for Cruise MUMMY which runs in parallel with his dislike for Fraser MUMMY is a yawning chasm between us which I fear will not be bridged in this lifetime:-)

    I’d probably check this out and I’m sure it assuaged the feelings of many a Grumpy Ass whose biggest peeve was that Fraser MUMMY was an INDIANA JONES-style action romp and not a “proper” horror flick.

  22. It’s really more of a hatred for the Fraser one than a love for the Cruise one. But Cruise’s is okay. I rewatched it earlier this year to talk about on the Overhated podcast, and yes, it is very flawed. But Sofia Boutella is still great, the monster FX are excellent, the humor is (by default) way better than in the Fraser one, and the silly shared universe stuff that everybody had a stick up their ass about actually was funny and it’s still a shame they didn’t do it. However, Lee Cronin’s is much better as a whole.

  23. Moved this up on my watchlist because it obtained the Vern Seal of Approval. It’s probably my favorite Lee Cronin film to date, though less Mummy-y and more Exorcist by way of Evil Dead. I’ll take it, though. That, uh, “pedicure” scene is the nastiest thing I’ve seen in a movie recently.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>