"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Twister

May 10, 1996

They’re scientists, but they’re cowboys. And they follow the wind. When they get the call they strut and they smile at each other knowingly as they hop into their Jeeps and trucks, slam on the gas and hurtle toward the danger, thinking nothing of it except ha ha, what a fun time we’re having here. They playfully exchange lingo-filled banter over the CB as they look up to the sky or down to the dots on their computer screens. They each have their own quirks and their own styles of musical accompaniment and their own ways of yelling “WAHOO!” in the face of God’s mighty wrath.

They are the wildpeople of weather, the maniacs of meteorology, the tornado terrorists, the thunder jockeys, the Doppler demons, the Hell’s Angels of nerds. They are the storm chasers, and they absolutely will not stop, ever, until they deploy their new device designed to release hundreds of small floating sensors into a tornado to measure it from the inside and obtain data that could potentially help improve early storm warning systems in the future.

They’re hard to keep track of but I believe their crew includes Dusty Davies (Philip Seymour Hoffman, THE GETAWAY), Rabbit (Alan Ruck, SPEED), Sanders (Sean Whalen, THE PEOPLE UNDER THE STAIRS, REVENGE OF THE NERDS III: THE NEXT GENERATION), Preacher (Scott Thomson, POLICE ACADEMY 1, 3 and 4), Haynes (Wendle Josepher, “Ticket Agent,” NORTH), Laurence (Jeremy Davies, “Just like punk, except it’s cars” Subaru commercial) and Beltzer (Todd Field, EYE OF THE EAGLE 2: INSIDE THE ENEMY, five years before directing IN THE BEDROOM). All of them serve their queen, Jo Harding (Helen Hunt, TRANCERS I-III, following KISS OF DEATH), who as a child (Alexa PenaVega right before THE GLIMMER MAN) witnessed her old man getting sucked out a storm shelter door and swallowed by an F5 tornado. So she’s spent her adult life tracking that fucker down trying to make it look her in the eye. Does she want revenge? An apology? I don’t know. When she sees one up close she gets kinda crazy, endangers herself saying “I want to see it!” She gets wind madness.

It would be nice if her father was still in there, spinning around with a Rip Van Winkle beard, and she gets to save him. But that would be a fairy tale. This is the hardcore, science based shit. It’s written by Michael Crichton (WESTWORLD) and his then-wife Anne-Marie Martin (an actress who was in the DR. STRANGE tv movie, PROM NIGHT and HALLOWEEN II), and you better fucking believe they watched a PBS documentary about storm chasers and probly did other research. You’re not dealing with students here. This is the principal and the vice principal.

For the first time Jo’s team is equipped with “Dorothy,” the aforementioned sensor thing, so it’s convenient that her estranged husband Bill Harding (Bill Paxton, THE DARK BACKWARD) shows up to have her sign the divorce papers, because he’s the one who originally conceived of Dorothy. But this is the life he wants behind him. He’s settling down to become a TV weatherman, and he’s very uncomfortable that everybody’s excitedly assuming he’s back, celebrating right there in front of his buttoned-up therapist fiancée Dr. Melissa Reeves (Jami Gertz, ALPHABET CITY, RENEGADES). But holy shit, they did it. That’s Dorothy. That was his dream.

And then that fucking no good corporate fuckface Dr. Jonas Miller (Cary Elwes, THE BRIDE) shows up with his own team of more highly funded nerd cowboys and his own sensor thing that’s called Dot3 and it’s the same concept as Dorothy except the sensors are cubic instead of spherical. Fucking thief. Fuck that guy. He’s got it coming. By which I mean he’ll ignore Bill’s warning about which direction the storm is going and a pylon will impale his driver and then their whole truck will fly into the sky and float around and then drop to the ground upside down and explode. But I’m getting ahead of myself.

Obviously a storm is coming, Jo runs off without signing the papers, Bill and Melissa follow and get caught up in the excitement, accidentally end up on the chase with the crew, Melissa at first thinking it will be fun and interesting to meet Bill’s old friends and see what he used to do, and then very quickly realizing what have I gotten myself into, these people are god damn lunatics and I’m too nice to yell at them. Also they need me here so there’s a reason for them to explain stuff that the audience needs to know. I really hope Gertz thought this was a fun, funny role to perform and not a thankless one. She does a great job being the party pooper who can’t hang while still being sympathetic because she’s so much more reasonable than every single other character in the movie.

One thing about the team is they all go way back – WAY back – with Jo’s beloved Aunt Meg (Lois Smith, FALLING DOWN). They have chased enough storms past Wakita, Oklahoma that every one of them is like family to her, they stay in her big old house and she makes them all giant steak and eggs from cows she butchers herself (not sure about the eggs) and she gives them all folksy advice and she has cool wind-sculpture things in her front yard that I guess she made so maybe that’s why she knows so much about weather. I like them because they’re a cool visual way to tell us the storm is coming. Like the cup vibrating in JURASSIC PARK.

Joss Whedon (TOY STORY), Steven Zaillian (CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER) and Jeff Nathanson (FOR BETTER OR WORSE) did rewrites, some of them during the shoot. At least some of it was to satisfy actor requests, including Hunt wisely not wanting a bunch of sniping between the wife and the fiancée. I would argue that the inevitable rekindling of romance doesn’t ultimately work, because the unleashing-of-the-frustrations fights Bill and Jo have in the car make it clear that these two should not be together! Maybe the weatherman thing is the wrong idea for Bill, but I don’t buy that these two getting back together is gonna make anybody happy.

I don’t know that much about Crichton so I could be off base, but based on his work I’ve seen I feel very confident in assuming that he was obsessed with learning the jargon and probly made everyone involved in the movie sit for hours hearing him talk about why they should make Dorothy for real. They couldn’t run because he was 6’ 9” so he would’ve just grabbed them by their shirttails and yanked them back like a mama cat grabbing a kitten. He was one of those guys who’s in the arts but also is obsessed with scientific stuff (he went to Harvard Medical School) so he gains an aura of expertise that is deserved but eventually goes wrong. Years after TWISTER he became a major promoter of the claim that humans don’t contribute significantly to climate change. He said that environmental policy should never be politicized, then he met with George W. Bush about his book State of Fear (“eco-terrorists plot mass murder to publicize the danger of global warming”) and testified to Congress. He helped contribute to our current world where one party is so brainwashed into denying the reality of climate change that the producers of the sequel TWISTERS were afraid to mention it in the movie even though it’s a movie about how FOR SOME REASON THAT NO ONE WILL EVER KNOW there are more severe storms than when TWISTER came out. If only we had Dorothy to do some measurements, I guess. Thanks for WESTWORLD and JURASSIC PARK, Mike, but fuck you for leaving us in Hell, you bloviating human minotaur.

Anyway I don’t love, but have a certain nostalgia for, this era of big studio blockbusters where the heroes were scientists and we were supposed to be impressed by their scientificness. Usually if a movie like this gets too corny it’s not that bad because you get to see some dinosaurs or a hollow man or something. A twister is not nearly as exciting, I thought, but you know what? I enjoyed revisiting this more than I thought I would. The weird thing is that at the time it was novel to see digital effects applied to disaster scenes, but what strikes me is that it still feels more real to me than some of the modern movies done with much more advanced technology. My guess is that it’s because, like with JURASSIC PARK, the digital effects were new enough that they are a smaller percentage of what you’re looking at than you’d have today. Yes, there’s sky replacement and animated tornadoes and things, but maybe more gimbals and giant fans and debris and vehicles dropped from helicopters than you’d have to use now? At least in most movies. One trick they hopefully don’t do anymore involves bright lights that make the sky look stormy, which were a confirmed bad idea when they burned Paxton and Hunt’s retinas, temporarily blinding them.

Obviously the flying cow was CGI. Everybody loves the flying cow – it’s the main thing we remember about the movie. I felt bad for her this time, though. R.I.P. flying cow, unless you made it out of there alive, you absolute badass.

The movie was pitched to studios not with a script or outline, but with an FX test of a truck getting picked up by a tornado. Spielberg had originally planned to direct, but moved on (as he often does). Directors considered are some of the obvious ones (James Cameron, Robert Zemeckis) and one insane one (Tim Burton). I’m glad he did MARS ATTACKS! instead! Jan De Bont picked it up to be his sophomore outing as a director after his American GODZILLA hit a dead end. (I’ve read that script, it would’ve been much cooler than the Emmerich one at least.)

I definitely don’t like this as much as I like his first movie SPEED, but I think De Bont still had some of that juice. He put together some effective spectacle, he said some smart things about how to keep the story moving, and he fought for the unusual casting of Hunt, who even herself thought she was a weird choice. At the time Bill “Game over, man” Paxton seemed like an unorthodox leading man as well, but that was apparently Tom Hanks’ suggestion after he passed on the role. (Yeah, I can’t picture him in this.)

De Bont was reportedly a maniac on set, though. He pissed off much of the crew, especially when he angrily pushed a camera assistant into a ditch and refused to apologize, prompting d.p. Don Burgess (BLIND FURY, FORREST GUMP) and his crew to walk off. A week later Jack N. Green (UNFORGIVEN) and his crew replaced them and Spielberg (1941) flew in to yell at De Bont. Two days before filming ended, Green was injured by the collapsing ceiling of Aunt Meg’s house, so De Bont (a brilliant d.p. before he started directing) took over for the final shots. Green must not have blamed De Bont, because he reunited with him the next year for SPEED 2: CRUISE CONTROL.

When the sequel came out two years ago I was surprised to hear some people talking about TWISTER like it was an enduring classic that was gonna be really hard to live up to. I still don’t think it is, but at least it’s about as pretty-okay as it was at the time. And it’s funny in retrospect to see Hoffman playing a role that might as well have been written for Jack Black. This was his movie between HARD EIGHT and BOOGIE NIGHTS, so he was about to blow up.

TWISTER had the sixth largest opening weekend of any film to that date, and the fourth largest non-LION KING, BATMAN or JURASSIC PARK film. It beat LETHAL WEAPON 3 and THE FLINTSTONES to become the largest May opening ever, helping establish May as part of the summer movie season (so it has an important influence on my retrospectives). It was the second highest grossing film of 1996, first highest to be covered in this series since #1 was INDEPENDENCE DAY. But it’s still not the movie of the summer in my opinion. That’s still to come.


tie-ins/franchise followups:

There was a pinball machine. It came out a month before the movie. Probly gave away the ending.

Crichton and Martin’s screenplay was released as a mass-market paperback.

In 1998 Universal Studios Florida opened the indoor special effects attraction Twister… Ride It Out. Visitors experience a simulated storm with water, fire and moving objects, hosted by Paxton and Hunt in video and audio recordings. In 2015 it was replaced by Race Through New York Starring Jimmy Fallon.

In 2020 Helen Hunt apparently wrote a legacy sequel with BLINDSPOTTING’s Daveed Diggs and Rafael Casal (!?) that she wanted to star in and direct. She had an eye toward making a racially diverse movie when that was a goal of many in Hollywood, but “We could barely get a meeting,” she said. Instead we got the unconnected 2024 sequel TWISTERS, directed by Lee Isaac Chung. It was well received, but I found it only okay, with moments of frustration. Something to do with a theme about storm chasers needing to care about the victims of the storms, illustrated by the heroine going into a town to help one (1) person briefly. I can’t really remember the details and didn’t feel inspired enough to write a review at the time. (Not ready to revisit.)

This entry was posted on Monday, May 11th, 2026 at 7:20 am and is filed under Reviews, Action. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

24 Responses to “Twister”

  1. I’ve also never been on the TWISTER hype train. It was okay, but so repetitive! (“Look, there is a storm! Let’s go! Oh no, we are too close!” *five minutes of noise and screaming and then we do it all again 10 minutes later*)

    That said, the last time I watched it (As a Discord watch party with a few online friends) I actually enjoyed it. Repetitive or not, the action scenes are so well put together and there is always something that makes them at least a bit different. It’s still not high on my favourite movies list, but I kinda get it now.

    TWISTERS on the other hand was pretty lame. It reminded me of those TRANSFORMERS movies that were not made by Michael Bay. Say what you want about the Bay ones, but when the human protagonists are caught in the middle of a giant robot battle, you are scared that the actors were in serious danger during the shoot. In the not-Bay movie everything was competent, but also safe. And that how it felt in TWISTERS. They amped up the bodycount, but you can see screaming people getting sucked in the air only so many times until it loses all its shock value. There never was a real escalation like in TWISTER WITH ONE S. They have a fire tornado in one scene, but it disappears within seconds without doing damage. You just know that DeBont of 1996 would’ve made it exciting.

    And (mild spoiler for TWISTERS) the beginning kinda made me hope that this time the trained scientists would be the heroes, while the weirdos would ruin everything, but sadly they changed it this time.

    BTW, I always thought that Cary Elwes’ fate in this one here was too harsh, but he once said in an interview that the movie was originally written with an R rating in mind (Y’know, like blockbusters used to be), but when that was changed, most of his scenes were cut for profanity reasons, which also had the side effect that the originally really evil antagonist who deserved to die became just a mildly annoying asshole who still died.

  2. After leaving TWISTER$ and being befuddled by how such a mid to bad movie was getting actual praise, I went home and rewatched this one for the first time in decades. The worst action scene in the original is way better than the sequel’s best action scene. So after the rewatch I’m just going to assume that everyone saying TWISTER$ was passable have not watched the original in a while because it is night and day in the filmmaking department. Even able to overcome the CGI has not held up too great. With this and SPEED, DeBont was on point with the spectacle. Think the climax is quite-good still.

    Definetly not a classic but does what it needs to do. Better than most disaster movies, especially ones from the 70s. But at the very least, a decently good time.

  3. I just realized that the plot of TWISTER is just a gender-swapped HIS GIRL FRIDAY with tornados instead of journalism. This makes me like TWISTER more.

  4. The weirdest thing about TWISTERS is how shortly after release for a full-day a surprisingly huge amount of people tried to convince me on social media that it was a commercial success because it was the new Glen Powell movie and not because it was a mindless disaster flick with a huge nostalgia and brand recognition bonus. (It should be noted that at this point I didn’t even know who that guy was and that he was in it.)

  5. The best thing about Twister is the supporting cast, including Hoffman, who turned out to be one of the best actors of his generation, and Field, who’s one of the best living writer/directors, even if he’s only made three films. If we all thought Twisters was pretty bad, we just have to give it ten years and then we can look back and be like “Oh, Nik Dodani was in this before he revealed himself to be a brilliant novelist? Dylan McCormack was the main character’s boyfriend five years before he started winning Oscars?”

    It already kind of happened with Katy O’Brian, who I didn’t know anything about in Twisters but who kicked all kinds of ass in Love Lies Bleeding. Tunde Adebimpe is a genius and Sasha Lane was phenomenal in American Honey. Some day Twisters will be more than a mediocre movie, it’ll be a mediocre movie with a wasted cast.

  6. I only saw this once, back in 1996, probably at the drive-in. You are correct: The only thing I remember about TWISTER is the cow joke. It’s a good joke. (Actually, I think I remember a second thing: someone says “We have debris!”)

    I liked TWISTERS. That one I saw at an old-timey one-screen theater, and so I was tickled when the climax of the movie also took place in one. It was a solid, old-fashioned throwback to what we didn’t realize was the halcyon days of the 1990s: shot on film, on location, with a charismatic American star.

  7. Yes, I had fonder memories of this until I rewatched it for the first time like ten years ago. The dialogue when Paxton is explaining who the “evil” scientists are has to be the worst lines ever delivered in a movie that made this much money. “They only care about money. They don’t care about science.” And the rest of the movie isn’t much better.

    Also, everyone remembers the damn cow but the best visual is when the drive-in showing THE SHINING gets ripped apart while Jack is axing down the bathroom door.

  8. I just realized that the plot of TWISTER is just a gender-swapped HIS GIRL FRIDAY with tornados instead of journalism.

    And His Girl Friday is a gender replaced Front Page

    It’s the ciiiirrcle of liiife…

  9. I’ve always wondered are there really storm chasers who are “corporate sellouts”? Is that a thing?

  10. I saw this on opening weekend have never felt the slightest inclination to revisit it, so I appreciate Vern for taking the bullet. I think the oddest aspect of TWISTER’s legacy has been the number of “- TWISTER” DTV movies still being made in its wake. TEXAS TWISTER. CHRISTMAS TWISTER. FIRE TWISTER. ICE TWISTERS. ATOMIC TWISTER. TWISTER VALLEY. This doesn’t include the many DTV films involving cyclones, hurricanes, tornadoes and sharknadoes, of course. I thought THE NIGHT OF THE TWISTERS was part of this sub-subgenre, but it turns out to have premiered on television in February of ’96.

  11. I think the Paxton/Hunt chemistry works here inbetween the setpieces, a solid blockbuster. Funny since Hunt and Paxton hated each other apparently.

    TWISTERS, the leads had no chemistry which kneecapped it. I’m beginning to think what’s his name isn’t the next Tom Cruise that Hollywood swore to me he was. Plus disappointing RUNNING MAN tanking didn’t help.

  12. Storm chasing always seemed like one of those hobbies that certain people really wanted to turn into something cooler than it really is. Maybe if it involved riding a kite or a wing suit into a funnel cloud, it could be cooler. But alas.

    I also really like the idea of Helen Hunt rescuing her elderly dad from the tornado. Turn this into something more like NOPE, or JAWS 4, and I’m in. Otherwise, local doppler radar guy gesticulating wildly in front of a green screen when a gnarly front blows through is more compelling storm product than this movie and so it remains unwatched for 30 years.

    My summer of 96 movie is also named after a hobby about recording data for personal enrichment, and so I hope we get a TRAINSPOTTING review! Since apparently KIDS was 95.

  13. “five years before directing IN THE BEDROOM” huh, live and learn

  14. grimgrinningchris

    May 11th, 2026 at 8:58 pm

    Majestyk… TWISTING CHANNELS?

  15. Shit I did not know Crichton went full right.

    In 1996 I was not impressed enough by the set pieces to forgive the plot. Revisiting it now I think they did a reasonable job constructing a plot where they had to keep getting Dorothy in front of tornadoes and learn to improve its design. Not a great job but a reasonable one.

  16. Simon Underwood

    May 12th, 2026 at 3:55 pm

    I really quite enjoyed Twisters the other summer – was certainly my favourite of the big summer films, and Daisy Edgar Jones was a real good choice for the lead. I also really liked Powell, and mainly just the feel of it. (Also the film does have a “this is climate change” moment with Maura Tierney’s character. They just didn’t put the words “climate” and “change” next to each other, but there’s nothing else she could be talking about. I sadly understand why the filmmakers had to say it wasn’t in the movie, but it was in there.

    One thing that Twisters did lack? A score. And I mean a proper leitmotif laden “I can hum this” score. I don’t love the original but do find it fun – excusing the odd clunky line. After seeing Twisters we revisited Twister on laserdisc (my god those mid-90s AC-3 Dolby Digital tracks rock – the sound design then is much more alive and playful and adventurous than now, with the many more channels added) and my core pleasurable moment will always be that wheatfield shot at the start, and Mark Mancina’s score projecting such excitement and spirit.

  17. BuzzFeedAldrin

    May 13th, 2026 at 6:52 am

    Scotty – in the 90’s ANYTHING and ANYONE could be a “sellout.” See the plot of Rent for example!

    I recall Twister being marketed as more of a CGI FX showcase than a compelling narrative. Reading your review, the plot seems pretty sturdy if not bog-standard (the couple had to reconcile at the end. Family values and all that) but it sounds like all the actors knew they were all going to play second fiddle to a CGI cow.

    Twisters, on the other hand, served no purpose other than to try and make Glenn Powell happen.

  18. This movie will always have a soft spot in my heart because 90’s emteem was basically in love with 90s Helen Hunt.

  19. RRA mentioned that Hunt and Paxton hated each other, which reminded me that in the Universal Studios attraction, the actors showed up on separate screens in part because they refused to shoot together again. Wikipedia says Twister began shooting in May 1995 and the Universal Studios thing started production at some point in 1997, so they really must have not got along to still be pissed two years later.

    Was also thinking more about Hunt seeming like weird casting and part of the reason she’s never felt like too much of a left-field pick to me is probably because Steven Spielberg cast Laura Dern in Jurassic Park. Because 80% of Twister is Jan de Bont taking notes on how Spielberg handled his own take on Michael Crichton’s “scientists who respect nature and the rich bozos who don’t” story.

  20. Hunt was in three TRANCERS movies, so TWISTER doesn’t seem like that much of a stretch to me.

  21. Helen Hunt played Rafael Casal’s mom in the Blindspotting TV show that Casal and Diggs co-created, which came out in 2021 so it was probably filming circa 2020. They probably got to talking about TWISTER while working together on that. (Unless it was the reverse, and them writing that Twister sequel spec script led to her being cast int he show.)

  22. Vern, all of your reviews are great but I feel like you were really on the jazz with this one. It was very, very funny and also correctly captured what an absolute dickhole Michael Crichton turned out to be. In a story that shows just how petty and small he was, Michael Crowley wrote a negative review of Crichton’s novel State of Fear. In Crichton’s next novel, he included a character named “Mick Crowley” who is a child rapist, described as being a Washington, D.C.–based journalist, and Yale graduate with a small penis.

    Dude had the thinnest skin imaginable.

    All that said, it shows how good this review is that I read it at all, considering this movie (and its sequel) do nothing for me and I have almost no memories of Twister and I hate Crichton. So kudos to Vern!

  23. BuzzFeedAldrin, to me the ultimate “anything and anyone can be a sellout” moment of 1990s cinema was in THE CROW, when the villain complains about how his tradition of causing mayhem on “Devil’s Night” has attracted amateurs and wannabes and greeting card companies.

    My copy of YIPPEE-KI-YAY MOVIEGOER! is in storage somewhere after my last move or I would get the exact quote, but I remember the “It’s Not Supposed to Be Hamlet” chapter opening with a statement to the effect that “if I didn’t like an action movie it means that it didn’t fulfill what I wanted from an action movie. It doesn’t mean I was expecting an intimate drama along the lines of IN THE BEDROOM.” I didn’t know that there actually was a big summer action blockbuster whose team included the director of IN THE BEDROOM. But I guess that secret sauce didn’t add much after all.

  24. Not saying three ads count as a summer blockbuster, not saying you can parse through these ads to ultimately realize they’re secretly an intimate drama, not saying this invalidates the point Vern was making, but it’s weird and great that Todd Field directed three Captain Morgan ads with what the production company says were 450 extras and a full-sized replica ship. Gal Gadot, of all people, shows up. If he somehow got the funding and wanted to do it, Field could make a kick-ass Zorro movie. He acted in 2 Jan de Bont films and these ads indicate he could do a better job at summer blockbuster action than de Bont was able to pull off. https://vimeo.com/455479194

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>