"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Masters of the Universe (2026)

I must confess that I was really excited for MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE. My childhood had its share of dumb cartoons and toys, but those spring-loaded muscle dudes were the ones that power-punched deepest into my brain. I don’t have strong opinions about the Eternian canon or whatever, it’s not holy scripture. It’s more like an incredible mural that I invest my own meaning into. The character designs and concepts, and also the overall aesthetic of fantasy barbarian paintings mixed with cyborgs and colorful vehicles shaped like spiders and sharks and buzzsaws and shit… it just makes me happy to think about it. I mean, there’s a castle with a giant skull on the front of it, and they gave that to the good guy! Even though by all rights the bad guy should’ve had it because he is a skull!

My attachment to Masters of the Universe isn’t about childhood nostalgia – it’s about a very specific, timeless vibe that came out of Mattel artists brainstorming crazy toy gimmicks, and the studio that made Fat Albert reverse engineering a cartoon out of them, together stumbling across one of the most potent mixes of stupid and awesome ever formulated. So I’ve had many years of anticipation as one movie adaptation after another has been dunked in the Evil Horde Development Slime Pit. I didn’t expect the world. I just figured I would get a kick out of whatever they came up with because even if it was bad it would be a modern movie where, like, Trap Jaw fights Ram Man. It would make me chuckle, at least.

Then a dangerous thing happened: they actually made the movie, and with a director that seemed likely to do a good job. Travis Knight is the head of the stop motion studio Laika, director of KUBO AND THE TWO STRINGS, and he also did BUMBLEBEE, the one actually good Transformers movie, the one that opens by capturing the Cybertronian cartoon shit Michael Bay was never interested in, then turns into a new thing, a heartfelt ‘80s-set teen movie IRON GIANT with a very likable Hailee Steinfeld befriending the titular alien robot Volkswagen. We can get into Knight’s peculiar background later, but his movies so far have been really good.

I was concerned when I read a plot summary that sounded like a GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY rip off (this He-Man grew up on Earth), but the trailers made the concept look okay, gave me that excitement of seeing Mekaneck and shit in live action, and when there started being good buzz from people not invested like me I thought holy shit, what if this is really good?

MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE has a great cast, an amazing theme song by Daniel Pemberton featuring Brian May on guitar, it’s well designed, has some big cool sets and colorful costumes, gives me the joy of putting these ridiculous characters in live action, giving them cool super-powered fights. It’s so much of what I wanted. But I think they fucked it up pretty badly.


It jumps right into Adam (Nicholas Galitzine, THE CRAFT: LEGACY) narrating quirkily about his childhood on Eternia. A magical place of palaces and volcanoes and griffins and talking tigers. He’s a nice goofy kid (Artie Wilkinson-Hunt as the young version) who happens to be the prince, son of King Randor (James Purefoy, JOHN CARTER), and he’s unenthusiastic about the combat training he has to do under the macho but warm Duncan, a.k.a. Man-At-Arms (Idris Elba, THE SUICIDE SQUAD). One day the kingdom is attacked by the skull-faced sorcerer Skeletor (Jared Leto, URBAN LEGEND), who seeks the Sword of Power, forged by the ethereal Sorceress (Morena Baccarin, THE WRECKING CREW) as a vessel for The Power of Grayskull that can make a person god-like to defend Eternia (or, if the person is Skeletor, to conquer it).

Being from Earth, and therefore knowing about Superman, Queen Marlena (Charlotte Riley, LONDON HAS FALLEN) has The Sorceress send little Adam and the sword through a portal to hide out here on her home planet. (Good rainbow colored portal work in this movie.) But he’s a clutz so he loses grip of the sword and now it’s 15 years later and he’s still looking for it.

It turns out he’s not telling this story to us, but to a horrified young woman he’s on a date with, causing her to ditch him. I hate this kind of joke that makes no sense for the character or story, only for the joke, and I’m afraid this is one of the better ones. Not one person on earth will want the earth section of the movie to be longer, yet it’s just not long enough to flesh out the idea. We only get cartoonish broadstrokes of a life – a wacky roommate (Christian Vunipola, MIGUEL WANTS TO FIGHT), a wacky job, drawing pictures of Eternia and posting on the internet that he’s looking for this sword. Some random nerd tips him off that it’s in a nearby comic shop, which leads to a bunch of nonsensical shtick that you would think everyone on set would’ve agreed just was not working and needed to be cut. But they kept it – even the joke about how a guy makes a video of him yanking the sword away from a statue and it looks like the statue is buttfucking him.

Thankfully when he holds aloft his mighty sword it sends a signal across the universe so while he’s stuck in traffic he gets attacked by Beast Man (a fun animated monster) and rescued by Teela (Camila Mendes, PALM SPRINGS), his childhood friend, and Duncan’s daughter, now a “warrior goddess.” Though I’m mixed on the comedy of Adam being bad at running and fighting at this point, I did think the battle in broad daylight on American streets somewhat justified bringing the story to earth.

Teela brings Adam back to Eternia, which is now in ruins. They find Duncan in jail, now a washed up drunk, and escape with a robot voiced by Kristen Wiig (WHIP IT) to meet up with the rebels, some of them regular humans like Dian (Christiaan Bettridge), some action figures like Fisto (Jóhannes Haukur Jóhannesson, ATOMIC BLONDE), Ram-Man (Jon Xue Zhang), Mekaneck (James Wilkinson) and Moss Man (Stephen Adentan). Unfortunately there’s a joke that (with the exception of Moss Man for some reason) these are not their actual names, but just the descriptions ten year old Adam had when he remembered them, and they get mad when he calls them that. It’s weird how this can be an incredibly loving adaptation but also remind us of that era when the X-Men had to wear black leather to be in a movie.

There are some battles where Adam is a doofus, then he does manage to use the Power of Grayskull to get his fabulous secret powers (I was surprised when his muscles grew since I didn’t realize they were pretending he wasn’t buff under his shirt). He tries to avoid fighting but has to rip off Trap Jaw (Sam C. Wilson’s) cannon arm and massacre a bunch of dudes. They have Galitzine doing all this comical awkwardness, but he’s also good when he’s just a sincere sweetheart, and he’s perfect when he takes control as He-Man. I enjoyed the fight scenes (stunt coordinator/second unit director: Liang Yang, THE EQUALIZER 3), which had me thinking of Mortal Kombat a bit with all their gimmicky super-powered violence, and surprised me since I never thought of my chunky action figures being so fast and agile. Also it’s been a while since we’ve seen a Conan-esque muscleman swinging a sword around like that.

In my experience most of society does not want to see Leto in movies anymore, and it’s weird that he’s still getting these roles, but for what it’s worth none of us would have any idea who it was if we hadn’t read it. He’s kind of doing Frank Langella, with his voice lowered, and the face is entirely animated. I assumed it wasn’t him under the muscle suit, but some say otherwise. Other than a few unfortunate comedy attempts the character works. Alison Brie (SCREAM 4) is great as his companion Evil-Lyn. She plays it as camp but is actually funny because it’s not bits, it’s just staying true to the character who sucks up to Skeletor but will betray him at the drop of a hat. She even does a cowardly exit in the tradition of Charlize in PROMETHEUS and that lady in ON DEADLY GROUND.

Despite the Earth part I generally like the story, which is credited to Aaron Nee & Adam Nee (THE LOST CITY) and Alex Litvak (THE THREE MUSKETEERS, THEY WILL KILL YOU) & Michael Finch (JOHN WICK 4), screenplay by Chris Butler (PARANORMAN) and the Nees & Dave Callaham (THE EXPENDABLES, MORTAL KOMBAT, SHANG-CHI AND THE LEGEND OF THE TEN RINGS). Unfortunately it just can’t stop itself from undermining just about everything with jokes, very few of them more than mildly chuckle-able.

I would’ve preferred them going full on macho – a 300 or CONAN THE BARBARIAN or CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK or HIGHLANDER type of feel, treating it with operatic seriousness. It would’ve been quite a bit cooler and immeasurably funnier. I went in knowing, accepting, and forgiving that that wasn’t the approach they chose, but my mercy does not extend to how consistently bad and intrusive the jokes are. Over and over again Knight does that joke where the actor and the music and the cinematography amp us up for something awesome that’s about to happen and then whoops, blammo, fart, the sky sled flies backwards and crashes or the magic spell didn’t work and the music stops and Skeletor’s goons give each other wacky looks. The exact same joke that was played out back when Joss Whedon was still allowed to show his face. Even in the last act, when it seems like we’re past all that shit, all the heroes get hyped up to go into battle and they strut in slow motion to (speaking of HIGHLANDER) “Princes of the Universe,” but it stops to do a joke about they all start choking on the cool looking atmospheric smoke. There are at least five times more implied record scratches in this movie than should be legal. Jesus christ, Travis, let us get into a groove!

And the worst part is how many of the jokes have the subtext of “Isn’t this stupid, though?” I know that Knight loves Masters of the Universe because he went through the trouble to build all this and dress everybody up and everything. But every five minutes he seems to get embarrassed and say “Ha ha, we all agree this is dumb though, right? What kind of name is Ram-Man?”

Get this: Nobody says the name “He-Man” until the very end, when he admits sheepishly that it was a name he made up as a kid, and his friends all laugh at him and say it’s stupid.

“Who are you?”
“I’m Batman.”
(Music stops. Awkward pause.)
“Pssshhh… seriously? That’s what you settled on? ‘Batman’!?”
“Well I mean— it’’s just— hey, come on, guys!”

I’ve heard it argued, mostly by fellow Gen-Xers, that it’s sad for my generation to be trying to force our nostalgia on the youths by making movies like this. On one hand, maybe, on the other hand, I am to this day grateful that Hollywood incorrectly assumed everybody wanted movies about Dick Tracy and The Phantom and The Shadow and all that. They didn’t force it on me – I was willing. And you could put SPEED RACER in that category too. I guess most of those movies didn’t really win over as many young people as they’d hoped, but I bet they would’ve done even worse if they had this “it’s stupid, right? How would he know what evil lurks in the heart of men?” approach.

Knight is one of the most unusual nepo babies I know of. He’s the son of Nike CEO Phil Knight (Ben Affleck in AIR), and when he got interested in animation his dad bought him Wil Vinton Studios to turn into Laika. That sounds like the most spoiled little weiner ever, but by all accounts he turned out to be a great animator, and I love 2 of the 3 movies he’s directed. He also has another one called WILDWOOD coming out this year and it looks amazing. So I wonder if there’s a parallel to Prince Adam, who everybody thinks is a doofus and he at least doesn’t get a chip on his shoulder about it but he keeps trying and eventually turns out to be awesome. But that’s about it. Not much depth detected.

There is an attempt to go further than nostalgia, to say a little something about different types of masculinity. I’m sure they got the idea from BARBIE’s much celebrated gender commentary, but I think it makes sense when adapting a cartoon specifically designed for boys and based on a focus group’s findings that said they were obsessed with the idea of “power.” It’s not required, but it could be a bonus.

They made it a whole motif. In the prologue young Adam doesn’t like training to fight, and isn’t good at it. Man-at-Arms “promised to make a man out of him” but goes too easy on him for the tastes of King Randor, who roughly spars with his son, knocks him to the dirt and tells him there’s no room for weakness. Fifteen years later when he’s living on Earth, Adam works with very sensitive people in human resources, he has gender non-conforming co-workers, he has a name plate with his pronouns, his roommate tries to hide that he gets emotional watching romcoms. Adam goes to the gym but doesn’t know what he’s doing, and also wears a cat t-shirt. The score turns into “Boys Don’t Cry” by The Cure. When he returns to Eternia he can’t fight, and even when he can he tries to avoid it. And he’s contrasted with macho Duncan, who struggles to get used to the idea that Adam talks about his emotions. Ultimately the Sorceress explains that previous men in his role as Guardian only used brute force, but she chose him specifically for his empathy and ability to talk things through, which is actually very in line with the original character and the p.s.a.s he would do at the end of some episodes.

I like the idea of exploring this theme, but they don’t have the discipline to commit to it. They only treat his human resources job as comedy; both the dressing down he gets from his boss (SNL 2014-2017 cast member Sasheer Zamata) and his attempt to use his job skills on Trap Jaw are portrayed as insincere, passive aggressive, buzzword-y bullshit. There’s no indication that Adam believes in the job or is good at it, we don’t ever see it resolve anything, we only are asked to laugh at it, so the Sorceress’s description of Adam as a peacemaker feels unearned.

They also cop out on the one part of the movie I found emotionally effective. After young Adam is knocked down and humiliated by his father, Man-at-Arms gets him to stand up, tells him his dad will respect him when he turns around and sees him back on his feet “like a man.” But Randor just keeps walking, never turns back around. Harsh. Heartbreaking. Fuck King Randor.

Then when reunited with grown up Adam, Randor is all ‘No son, I wasn’t disappointed in you, I was just worried about you.’ I don’t think he should’ve gotten away with that. ‘Oh no, I didn’t fail, I didn’t hurt you, you just misunderstood.’

If Randor was wearing Nikes or those sunglasses Affleck had on in the movie I would have to wonder if maybe Adam isn’t as in touch with his emotions as we’re being told.

Anyway, they got pretty close. I sat there watching this movie and being frustrated because a really good MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE I would’ve loved is visible in the distance, just past the swamps and volcanoes. It feels to me like in all those years of rewrites they either almost got there or (more likely) did get there but kept second guessing and ended up here. I wish they would’ve had faith in the straight fantasy movie elements and not felt the need for all the self-deprecation. It coulda been something.

But that was it. That was probly our last shot at a He-Man movie, Gen-X. Is it too late to try Thundercats?

 

P.S. SUPER SPOILER NERD SHIT I LIKED: Teela in general, but also the pandering of giving her the more accurate costume at the end. Zoar. He-Man riding Battlecat to the original theme song at the very end (making me think “why didn’t you do this earlier?”). The stingers in the credits, as obvious as they were. Seeing Dolph (but not his actual part, which made no sense at all). Zodac’s name being used as a deity. Spikor being used as a weapon. Probly other stuff.

This entry was posted on Monday, June 8th, 2026 at 7:58 am and is filed under Reviews, Action, Fantasy/Swords. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

54 Responses to “Masters of the Universe (2026)”

  1. I went into this, despite knowing very little about HE-MAN, because I was bored after a shift, and SCARY MOVIE didn’t appeal to me. The next day, when a buddy of mine called and questioned how it was, my immediate response was, “I admit I’m not a fan of this stuff, but do He-Man fans really want a movie where eighty percent of the jokes are about how stupid the names of He-Man characters are?”

    So, this was probably a less obnoxious experience for me, but I spent almost the entire film feeling held at arm’s length, never being able to get into it on a more substantive level because of how miserable the humor was. I will cop to laughing at the hallucinogenic montage during the final fight; it’s not really any less stupid than the other gags, but I admired how committed they were with it.

    So I guess my reaction was mostly the same as yours. Would have been much better if they’d had the guts to take it way more seriously. I’m so tired of self-defensiveness disguised as playful irreverence in movies like this.

  2. I can’t believe it’s 141 minutes long. Lemme re-edit it to a cool 90 mins that cuts out all the “jokes” and most of the Earth guff (or at least the date, HR and endless endless wrestling-wth-the-statue “gags”)

  3. Yeah, I will still watch that thing one day, but when I heard about all those “Haha, these guys have silly names” jokes, I decided to wait for streaming.

    One thing that I find interesting about this Franchise is that it’s a dozen different things. The original cartoon could be intentionally funny as hell, but also had some surprisingly deep plots at times and really cool fantasy concepts. (Paul Dini and J. Michael Straczinsky were among the writers.) Skeletor was humorfluid. He could be an evil threat or a silly goof who would call someone a “boob”, depending on what the script asked for. The original comics were pretty serious SciFantasy action. So was the 2002 show, but even that one wasn’t dark and gritty enough to say “We change all the silly character names or act like we are ashamed of them”.

    In the end I do think that a He-Man movie that tries to be funny is absolutely legit. It’s just strange that the man who made a TRANSFORMERS movie that removed all of Michael Bay’s weird-ass slapstick to the point that it almost felt boring, suddenly goes full “Yeah, I know you grew up with that, but have you noticed that it’s dumb?” on us.

    I love the theme song though. Glad someone had at least the balls to get a band like The Darkness for it.

  4. Was never really a He Man fan to be honest, so I’ll wait for streaming.

    Hollywood, give me that Thundaar The Barbarian movie damnit!!

  5. Vern, that closing joke in the movie definitely made me think of the times you’ve called out similar jokes in FANTASTIC FOUR or GHOST RIDER movies – “ha ha, what a stupid character idea, who would actually want to watch this?” Up to that point I was thinking “this is okay, it could’ve been better but its fine” but that final joke left me with a sour overall impression of the movie.

    I did not grow up with these characters, but I grew up on various equivalents like CLASH OF THE TITANS or KRULL or THE BEASTMASTER. A swords-and-spaceships HEAVY METAL type of movie with modern big-budget production values was what I wanted, but only sort of got.

    In the 1980s, filmmakers fully committed to their pulpy nonsense. Then in the 1990s and early 2000s they added snark and ironic distance in order to try to seem superior to the material. I thought we were past that attitude, because I’d gotten used to these things being entrusted to people who were fans themselves and therefore knew what was cool about it and how to make it work.

    That the movie seems to be very well-received is interesting to me. It makes me wonder what the core appeal is of He-Man / Masters of the Universe to its adult fans – do they consider it something good and sacred and meaningful from their childhood (the stance of so many other fandoms) or is it more of a guilty pleasure?

    I ask because we’re used to the phenomenon of seeing a perfectly entertaining movie only to be told by fans that it’s a mockery of the source material. This one might be the opposite – if like me you’re coming in fresh and want a fantasy movie that takes its story, themes, character development and world-building seriously, you’ll be disappointed. But it maybe has more to offer to a knowing audience who came to laugh along with the absurdity of the material, and at themselves for having been impressionable enough as a kid to accept this plastic silliness, and if you get the callbacks to the weirder and goofier elements. Kind of like how references to the Star Wars Holiday Special are funny *because* it’s such a bizarre cringe artifact that acknowledging it feels like defiance. There might be an Adult Swim type of postmodernism here that I’m slightly too old to instinctively connect with.

    But I had the exact same thought about how the script seems like either a first draft or a too-many-cooks zillionth draft. For example I didn’t know what they were trying to do with Adam’s housemate. He has a man bun, he wears something that could either be a bathrobe or a woman’s coat, and he gets weepy at a chick flicks before guiltily turning it off as Adam walks in the room. Is he supposed to be a feminized influence that Adam needs to resist? Probably not since he seems to be Adam’s only friend, plus he brings him to visit Eternia at the end. So is he supposed to be demonstrating a more open and sensitive version of masculinity that Adam could learn from? That doesn’t quite seem to be the case either. So I don’t know.

    I liked what the woman in the comic book store says as Adam is running out the door, and I liked the choice of song on a car radio during the highway fight. Those were two small jokes that amused me. More actual wit instead of funny-coded ironic snark would have made a huge difference.

  6. Stray thought but the way you describe this flick calls to mind Tsui Hark era HK fantasy; totally broad, much “buffoonery” and an earnest desire to make this ridiculous shit cool. Hh. Kinda want to see it even more now.

  7. The Travis Knight “one of the most unusual nepo babies” thing Vern brings up here is something I’ve thought a lot about, especially after watching Claydream, the great documentary about Will Vinton. I don’t want to take credit away from a person just because they come from generational wealth, but I have no idea how much of a Travis Knight production is due to his talent, voice, etc. and how much of it is due to him having the money to hire people who make him look good. Does Chilly Tee have vision or was he part of a hostile takeover to control a group that has vision?

    None of that changes how I feel about the movies themselves. Missing Link, their last feature, is my favorite thing Laika’s done and it’s their biggest bomb. Every Laika movie has made less money than the film that preceded it, with Coraline being the only one that’s definitely made money. Laika also, unfortunately, tends to pay its employees poorly, if you believe different animation industry whisper networks (there are some spreadsheets you can google if you want to get bummed). I don’t think you get new stop motion movies in 2026 unless your studio’s run by the son of the richest person in Oregon and his desire to keep his kid’s studio afloat outpaces his need for $100 million.

    I don’t care about auteur theory, especially when it relates to an animated film a million people are touching or a Jon Turteltaub-y Masters of the Universe movie that probably wasn’t going to be a home run anyway, but I guess my class issues run too deep for me to ever be fully comfortable with Travis Knight’s place in his industry.

  8. Dooley the Gravedigger

    June 8th, 2026 at 2:18 pm

    Ironic snark wasn’t really a thing with all the 80’s movies we grew up on, then Whedon and Marvel had consistent or sporadic success doing it, so producers now likely go, shit, all those other recent fantasy and SF films are ironic and snarky, and yours isn’t? Let’s fix that before we get into big trouble.

    I think the trend will be disrupted by smaller creators who don’t need to follow the trend, or big creatives powerful enough to demand the movie stand on its own – Cameron, Del Toro, Spielberg and probably some others – but anyone in that vast middle ground is going to be triple guessed by creative partners who thing snark is the only path to success.

    I had a He-Man doll and liked the commercials, a committed and pulpy version of this story would have appealed to me more than this hey, isn’t this stuff goofy? nonsense. A bit of a shame, really.

    I’m glad Ringo Lam didn’t decide to make BURNING PARADISE snarky when he made it back in the day. They just decided to tell the story and put some cool violent fantasy and adventure into that movie. If Lam had made it in the US I’m sure they would have been urging him to make it goofier.

  9. I just had another theory about this movie: It might be trying to emulate the type of jokes in BARBIE (and the Lego movies) that are based on acknowledging the limitations of this being a toy.

    It would explain the joking about the various heroes’ corny names, and also the deadpan discussion of Skeletor’s motivation: “He’s a villain.” “There must be more to it than that.” “His face is a skull.” So maybe they were trying to lean into and embrace the artificiality instead of just undercutting it.

    If that’s what they were going for, part of why it doesn’t work is that there’s nothing to really convey the idea of Eternia being artificial or fictitious. Either they never figured out how to set that up, or something got lost in an earlier draft.

    Maybe the real problem is the direction more than the script. A lot of the weak jokes might have been funnier if they were played absolutely straight, if the tone was more AIRPLANE! and less like a bad SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE skit.

  10. I feel like the success of Guardians of the Galaxy has sort of ruined the old school straight forward adventure/fantasy movie. Even the MCU movies were more jokey post GoTG.

    Now every fantasy/sci-fi movie feels like they have to wink at the audience

  11. Whedon gets a lot of blame for the snarkification of sci-fi-fantasy cinema, but I think it’s a case of his imitators learning the wrong lessons. Whedon’s stuff was always about 65% knowingly sarcastic and 35% achingly sincere. He knew when to undercut and when to play it straight. That sudden sincerity usually landed, because you weren’t expecting it. The better post-Whedonites, like Gunn, knew how to find the balance. The hacks never dug deep enough to find the bedrock underneath all the wisecracks.

    In my opinion, the real Patient Zero of the snarkademic is SHREK. The canned one-liners, the ironic needle-drops, the entry-level post-modernism…it can all be traced back to SHREK.

  12. I will further expand on my “it’s funny because it’s a cheesy toy” theory of humor: It worked in BARBIE because Barbie is a toy version of real life, therefore it’s funny to acknowledge all the ways in which Barbieland is a crude approximation of our world (drinking from an empty cup, having feet designed for high heels, etc).

    Whereas He-Man occupies the sci-fi/fantasy genre, where there’s no established reality to be undermined by the limitations of a toy. On the contrary, our expectation of the genre is that its creators are supposed to put as much effort into establishing its rules, backstory, motivations etc as possible in order to *make* it seem like a real world. So avoiding that effort for comic effect feels like laziness rather than clever subversion.

  13. I had a Castle Greyskull playset and a battle damage He-Man with a Battle Cat figure (that shit was cool even if it was rigid plastic) and I remember having a puce colored tank-ish vehicle where the whole front end was a shark mouth. And I watched the cartoon enough to have memorized the intro. But for some reason, He-Man/MotU never reached the level of Transformers or Thundercats for me. The figures were so identically roided and the characters had those “the first thing that pops into your head when you see him is his name” identities, and the prince valiant hair with the hulk grimace was always a little too off putting even in the 80s. I can see why they went with the idea of “these names are what I came up with for these guys when I was 10” to explain that but it does seem to make this one of those movies that is embarrassed it has to adapt the source material.

    I’m surprised there’s so little mention of Skeletor in this review though. That seems like the biggest missed opportunity (beyond the problematic and pointless casting of Leto) if they were leaning into the ridiculous cartoon aspect. Maybe don’t go full The Monarch with the camp, but I was hoping he would have that same nasally voice as the original and some of that bitchy personality to bounce off of He-Man in a funny way. If he’s just evil menacing Skeleton Guy then that seems less entertaining. Especially if you have to picture Leto when he talks too.

    I would also like to second a Thundarr movie though, and also maybe the Herculoids. I don’t know why we need another Star Wars when Thundarr and his fabulous sun sword are right there.

  14. I was the right age for MOTU, but it was never really my thing. That said, on 2026 I’d see a straight-faced adaptation in a heartbeat. This one just sounds frustrating, though.

    By the way, if anyone is looking to scratch their Frank Frazetta/Robert E Howard itch, I highly recommend Genndy Tartakovsky’s Primal on HBO Max. Beautifully animated, genuinely moving, and with at least one epic, ridiculously violent action set piece per episode.

  15. Majestyk, I was also thinking of Shrek as the point most of this meta winking stuff draws from now. Whedon always got plenty meta but I think he’s mostly to blame for “So… that happened” dialogue. The two converge a lot, and the most recent example of that is probably the Deadpool movies, but I think Shrek’s where you get stuff like “things are ramping up and then the song slows down and the action is deflated as a joke.” Whedon’s absolutely a culprit, but Shrek put most of the poison in that well.

    The problem with that kind of thing is you can only do it once. I was 12 when it came out, so take this with a grain of salt, but I thought Shrek was one of the funniest things I’d ever seen. I also loved Last Action Hero, but I’m more alone on that. The hundredth time you make fun of action/Disney fairy tale/toy properties adapted into movies tropes, it’s stale. The X-Men and Spider-Man movies made fun of silly character names over 25 years ago, doing the same in a MotU film now doesn’t have any edge. I think you could still be meta and winky if you went for unexplored material— go ahead and finish that script poking fun at Ingmar Bergman movies— but if you’re even the second or third guy laughing at how silly the name “Stinkor” is, you’re probably laughing alone.

  16. grimgrinningchris

    June 8th, 2026 at 10:18 pm

    I’m not going to “read the rest of this shit” or any of these comments- unless you address me by name in the first line of your comment and know that I plan to see this movie this week.

    That said, I wanted to say that I actually saw the MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE touring arena show back in the 80s. My main memories are of kid me being really impressed with the sets/set up, the theme song (I still get the hook to it stuck in my head randomly and I haven’t heard it since that day almost 40 years ago), my mom (RIP) waiting in the car while my friend and I were there because I invited him without telling her like a little shit and we only had two tickets, that I’d seen a news story on the show that said that the man and woman playing He-Man and She-Ra were married in real life and had met doing a Hercules or Conan (or something) stunt show together at Universal Studios in CA… and lots of roller skating… LOTS. OF. ROLLER. SKATING.

    Anyone else see that?

  17. Tim Bobo, I think the GOTG movies are not to blame for it at all, because they are brutally honest about their emotional components. In fact, they are sad and depressing as fuck for a lot of their run time. James Gunn never played the emotional parts as joke and goes so far that I have no idea why people always remember them as these light hearted kids movies.

    The first one already starts with the saddest scene in a summer blockbuster since the baby ant died in HONEY I SHRUNK THE KIDS. And the finale isn’t “Starlord relives the trauma of watching his mother die and then goes into a dance off with the bad guy”, it’s the other way around. Shit, part 2 is a candy coloured popcorn movie about different ways of parental abuse and takes the topic seriously. Nobody cracks a joke when Starlord finds out what his father did and “I’m Mary Poppins” leads to another tragic moment that is allowed to play out longer than in most humor free movies. I still haven’t watched part 3 because I know Rocket’s backstory will ruin my week, but I surely didn’t laugh when Lex Luthor executed the man who helped Superman, just to psychologically destroy him.

    In general James Gunn makes absolutely hilarious movies that go into super sad and serious mode whenever they have to. Look at SUPER, which is the funny story of a socially awkward man who becomes the worst superhero ever until it becomes clear that he is a psychopath himself and the whole movie ends with rape, drug addiction and murder that isn’t played for laughs at all. If you want to blame him and his movies, sure, go ahead, but you really need to blame the people who took the wrong lessons from it. You are blaming MUPPET BABIES for FLINTSTONE KIDS.

  18. Shrek was the culmination of snark maybe, but y’all are forgetting the 90s where if you’d have to BEG for an action movie to take things seriously. Batman Forever does the record scratch thing when we see Batman suit up super cool, then a joke about picking up drive-thru. Constant terrible jokes, and then Batman and Robin decided to just torpedo the whole franchise. How in the fuck Joel Schumacher worked after that I do not know. And it was the era of catch phrases, no matter what horrors the hero may have seen, better believe there’s going to be a wisecrack as he kills the villain. Man they even threw in so many ADR’ed jokes in Demotion Man because they were afraid two guys fighting couldn’t be exciting enough. Tango and Cash, was that 80s? Woof.

  19. Blaming GOTG or Marvel films is like blaming SCREAM for the wave of post-modernistic horror films. Not the OGs fault if the bootleggers suck trying to replicate the formula.

    I think even if MOTU had been damn good, it would’ve been like DUNGEONS & DRAGONS a couple years back which was terrific fun…and nobody went to see it in theaters because the IP wasn’t that powerful and it looked “I can wait for streaming.” MOTU’s fanbase is middle age guys.

  20. On topic of Hollywood learning the wrong lessons, reminds me of the current thinkpiece “wisdom” after OBSESSION and BACKROOMS is gee YouTubers are now taking over Hollywood!

    And in theory, yeah many folks are making their little shorts and putting them on YT and bypassing film schools or working in commercials/indie films, climb the ladder. Hey Bob, we like what you do. Care to do more of that as a feature or take a spin of your imagination?

    But in reality I feel the industry will just look at hit/sub numbers and think a goddamn Mr. Beast movie will bring his fanbase to the multiplex. Hell a TikTok “Star” had a movie out last year which had an irrelevant release.

  21. Surely Aladdin (1992) was the defining example of adding self-aware jokes and deflating sincerity with quips? Just because it had funnier jokes than what followed doesn’t let it off the hook for introducing permanent insincerity and wildly out of place pop-culture references to these kinds of movies. Although I still crack up at “Phenomenal cosmic powers!!…” I was stunned rewatching The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996) recently to see that it came so close to being a genuinely great serious, dramatic animated movie, but the talking gargoyles kept quipping away, including over the final shot, and it deflated me.

    I felt the same vicarious deflation reading Vern’s review of Masters of the Universe. I have no interest whatsoever in any movie that assumes I’m a smug cynical arsehole who can’t take absurd fantasy conceits seriously. It inspires a pretty extreme generalisation: any culture that can’t embrace serious sincere storytelling as a matter of course is incurably diseased. Why are Americans who make media for children incapable of sincerity? Of telling stories without constant self-aware quippery? This is why I stick with European and Asian media (comics especially), as the inability to commit to your own far-fetched world instantly nullifies all interest.

    I liked He-Man as a child. My cousins had ALL the toys, of which I was jealous. But just like TMNT, it’s something that is no longer of interest. There’s no nostalgia attached to this anymore. When it comes to the cartoons I saw in the 80s that I still like, I don’t want to see new movies based on them. Let those things rest. Not that anyone would ever make them, but I don’t want to see The Mysterious Cities of Gold or Ulysses 31 as numbing CGI-filled bombastic movies.

  22. A good question is why MOTU didn’t have the multi-generational power of TMNT? Was MOTU just specific an aesthetic tied to a particular era in pop culture?

  23. If there is one thing that this discussion has proved, it’s that variations of “Deflating a movie with jokes” have been around forever. SHREK is already 26 years old and before it became a formula itself, used its jokes to make fun of another formula. Joss Whedon didn’t come out of nowhere when he was directing THE AVENGERS in 2012. BUFFY started in 1997 and became a popculture phenomenon because of his humor. And even before he joined the MCU their movies were full of humor and quippy dialogue, which were IMO one of the reasons why they were so popular. After years of dark & gritty “no jokes allowed” post-9/11 bullshit, audiences were finally allowed to laugh again and have heroes that were broken and traumatized, but also “just like us”.

    You can’t even blame ALADDIN’s popculture jokes for any of that, because while it had the “We just let Robin Williams say whatever he wants and animate it” factor, funny sidekicks have always been part of Disney movies. SNOW WHITE had seven of those! PINOCCHIO had cutaway scenes to a cute cat and a goldfish acting way too human while Jiminy Cricket had his own share of sight gags throughout the movie. CINDERELLA focused so much on the shenanigans of the mice that it felt like one of those LAUREL & HARDY movies, where they were sidekicks to an attractive hero and his girlfriend who went on a big adventure. And then suddenly the fairy godmother shows up late in the movie and provides some chuckles too. The only character in THE JUNGLE BOOK who is never subjected to a joke is Shir Khan. And so on.

    THE TAKING OF PELHAM 123, released in 1974, is a gritty thriller with a string of damn funny jokes throughout and even ends with a freeze frame on Walter Matthau’s smirking face. And Matthau himself cameos as a drunk in EARTHQUAKE whose only job is to be funny during the big earthquake scene. Even a based-on-a-true-story drama like THE GREAT ESCAPE had scenes like someone falling through his bed after parts of it were salvaged without his knowledge.

    To paraphrase Frank Zappa: Does humor belong in movies? Absolutely, if you ask me. And as I said, the problem is not that they made a funny He-Man movie, since the 80s cartoon was already quite jokey and the people who made the toys admitted that the character names were made up for shits and giggles. It appears to be really just the jokes that they chose. You can make He-Man/Adam funny. It worked for Captain America. The MCU version is a nerdy goody two shoes whose squareness is often played for laughs. BUT! Even before he grows muscles they make sure that you have no reason to question his capabilities as a hero.

  24. Knowing pop culture winks have for sure been around forever. The first part of the first novel, Don Quixote, was published in 1605 and in the second part, published in 1615, people reference stuff that happened in the first part. They’ve read the book they’re in. So that’s at least like ten years before Shrek.

    For me, Shrek is the beginning of this specific kind of knowing pop culture wink because that was the entire point, it was wall to wall “What if the ogre…. was the hero??” and “The kingdom is called… Far, Far Away??” and “The big, bad wolf is… a dude in a dress??” Nearly every part of that movie is supposed to be a subversion of fairy tales, specifically Disney adaptations of fairy tales, and you, a child who has seen fifty of those adaptations and read a hundred of those books, are supposed to be in awe that somebody’s finally saying it. And then the crashing into the present is a big thing, too. It’s just Fractured Fairy Tales but there are Smash Mouth songs. It’s Aladdin if every character was the Genie or it’s Joss Whedon if Buffy the Vampire Slayer was more concerned with poking holes in vampire and Dracula lore instead of creating its own lore.

    I absolutely don’t think all of that started with Shrek, either, but I do think that’s where it exploded, especially in big studio summer movies. And then Deadpool is Teen Shrek and that leads directly to stuff like Masters of the Universe.

  25. I think that Joss Whedon and James Gunn have both excelled at pouring their hearts into their characters and being sincere about emotions while also having lots of jokes that at least in Whedon’s case can definitely be described as snarky. I don’t blame either of them for being influential, and I think Gunn is still pulling it off. The reason I named Whedon specifically is that I remember a moment, I believe in the second AVENGERS movie, when he had Iron Man or somebody about to do some badass shit and then it going wrong and saying some awkward thing and it felt like that joke had officially lost its power, the formula had become too visible, and I began yearning for super hero movies with the courage to just show us the cool thing. Soon it actually did become more common, but the deflating joke is still overdone.

    (One version I really like is when Batman tries to glide in THE BATMAN and totally bites it, but maybe that’s partly because the movie is so serious and it doesn’t play out in the rhythm of a joke, it just seems like a funny turn of events.)

    RRA – It’s a good question about the multi-generational popularity of TMNT. He-Man and Thundercats have both had good to great revivals but I don’t think many kids ever cared. Weirdly She-Ra might be the only ’80s cartoon that pulled it off, but I think it was a matter of doing a totally different style and tone and maybe aimed at kids a little older than the original batch.

    There is something about the ninja turtles concept, though. It made no sense at the time and it still doesn’t. It will be with us until the world ends. (Same with Scooby-doo.)

  26. It’s a real shame that the movie feels the need to poke fun at itself so much because it seems like we’re in the midst of a sword and sorcery revival, and since Masters of the Universe is at least sword and sorcery adjacent, it’s well-timed to take advantage of this swell in popularity.

    I personally never got into Masters of the Universe, largely because I might have been a tad young for it and because my television viewing was highly restricted as a kid. But the trailers looked bright and fun. I’ll probably check it out on streaming.

    And it never fails to amuse me that people still attribute “So that happened” to Whedon, even though from what I’ve read, the first utterance of that line actually comes from a movie written by none other than David Mamet. A few years ago, I watched the awful Willow TV show revival, and it became pretty apparent they were trying to ape Whedon. He may have been an abusive asshole who shouldn’t be allowed near a production again, but clearly he could calculate sincerity and comedy in a way that others struggle.

  27. While watching this, I kept thinking of Thor: Love and Thunder. It’s a movie that tells you, “You’re stupid for watching this stuff.” Not a good feeling.

  28. The Batman gliding bit works because it’s ot really a deflating joke. It kind of ups the stakes because he’s about to do some crazy shit he’s never done before, and succeeds, but still gets fucked up. So it’s humorous not not really a statement of “can you believe THAT?” The deflation version would be Batman about to jump and then goes “nope!” out loud, cut to him in the elevator.

  29. Oh as for TMNT, I have friends who have very young kids and maybe too young for watching stuff like He-Man or even a softer Batman movie (the show may be fine but still might be too scary with the Joker laughing) so I don’t know what they may think about that, but they LOVE the Ninja Turtles. Two different households and Ninja Turtles kid doodles and books are all over.

  30. Vern, I don’t recall Whedon ever undercutting Iron Man. I think you’re thinking of IRON MAN 3, when Tony’s posed dramatically waiting for his suit to assemble on him and instead it just smashed into bits behind him. So your beef is probably with Shane Black.

  31. This review and discussion has been a fascinating read for me.

    The main thing that really stood out to me when I re-watched the He-Man cartoon a couple years ago is how much of the show is given over to Adam’s transformation ritual. The bit where he takes out the sword and booms “by the power of Grayskull” and then he transforms and his cat transforms and they play the awesome music — that is often the only payoff in an episode.

    The source material is extraordinarily thin, a stick of gum disguised as a three-course meal. It’s kind of funny to watch financiers try to breathe life into the “IP” when all they really have to work with is a very cheaply animated 45-second music video.

    I was a lot more interested in this when I thought Hailee Steinfeld was going to be in it.

  32. I’m going to see it next Monday and maybe weigh in with an opinion later – believe it or not, this is the first time of me going to the movies since ‘Honor among Thieves’ (2023) because I don’t like to leave my dog alone just for my amusement. So live-action MOTU is a kind of important event for me…

  33. Lorin A Kozlowski

    June 9th, 2026 at 2:37 pm

    I think TMNT endures because it has 4 distinct personalities at it’s core, and everyone has a different favorite. I was also a He-Man guy as a little kid, but that gave way to Ninja Turtles and comic books and I really never looked back. MOTU suffers from not having any depth. It was constructed as an empty calorie meal and that has never changed. When you try to “dig in” to the mythology there is no there there. Who even is Teela or Fisto? I feel like they could have acted any old way and it wouldn’t have offended anyone because they don’t really have any defining characteristics to begin with.

    I completely agree that the film constantly apologizing and insulting itself did it no favors, and made me feel dumb for even giving it a little bit of interest. However, I have to give credit to the action sequences, which were all very good. Clear and smooth, you could see it all. 15 years ago, it would be a choppy mess.

    I would like to call a moratorium on intro scenes of the lead characters as children. Don’t want em, don’t need em. This wasn’t as egregious as the beginning of KRAVEN THE HUNTER, but it still went on for too long.

  34. Peter Campbell

    June 9th, 2026 at 3:04 pm

    I really enjoyed this film. The jokes didn’t bother me at all as I am in no way a He-man fan. I found this to be far better than the Mandalorian.

  35. Are She-Ra and Mumm-Ra related? Was Lion-O originally from Eternia and that’s why he’s named like Fisto and Orko?

  36. Majestyk – I don’t have room for any beef with Shane Black that’s not Parker related.

    (You might be right but I really think it was in the one with Ultron. Might not have been Iron Man. I haven’t rewatched many of the Marvel movies.)

  37. For those who have a soft spot for He-Man, I really recommend trying Masters of the Universe: Revelation, the animated mini-series on Netflix (there’s also a second series called Revolution). It’s produced and partly written by Kevin Smith of all people, but I thought he did a great job of taking the concepts of the old cartoon and building pretty clever mythology around it, with some laughs but a more serious tone than the movie. At the beginning He-Man is gone, and Teela (Sarah Michelle Gellar) is the main character. There’s all kinds of shit with Eternian history and religion (dead heroes go to a heaven called Preternia), we find out what happens when Skeletor (Mark Hamill) gets the sword and He-Mans out, Lena Headey plays a very layered and interesting Evil-Lyn, Stephen Root plays Cringer, Jason Mewes cameos as Stinkor (not joking), Henry Rollins plays Tri-Klops (still not joking). And they really love to just work in every stupid vehicle and playset that ever existed into huge battles.

  38. I’m glad you brought that up, because it gives me the chance to come clean: I really liked PLAY DIRTY. It’s definitely not Parker as we know him, but I started thinking of Wahlberg as Parker’s illegitimate son who didn’t grow up with his dad but heard a lot of stories about him and maybe got to know him a little on his death bed and learned a lot about the business from him but was determined to have his own style. After I made that little mental leap, I had a blast with it. So Black’s still batting a thousand with me.

    Really fucking weird subway geography though. Those stations make no sense. I got out at the station where the train would have crashed every workday and it’s not like that at all. Where’s the building with the big orange thing at the top that looks like a sports deodorant from the 80s? Plus that’s not what’s at that address in Williamsburg. Fuckin’ LA people writing New York movies. There oughtta be a law.

  39. Speaking of Kevin Smith, today I was listening to the most recent episode of his Fatman Beyond podcast, which he co-hosts with fellow writer Marc Bernardin (who was also involved with Smith’s recent MOTU show).

    Regular followers of that podcast will know that when they discuss recent pop culture, Bernardin can be a picky viewer with very detailed criticisms about story, character, theme etc.

    Somewhat to my surprise (and Smith’s), Bernardin thoroughly enjoyed this MOTU movie. He thought it was a cute idea that the character names were the product of a young boy’s imagination. He had no notes and no complaints, in contrast to his ripping apart of the new MANDALORIAN movie in a previous episode.

    So whatever misgivings this here community may have about the style of humor popularized by Whedon or Shrek or the Genie, in this case it seems to be hitting the spot with its target audience.

  40. between vern’s reviews and the commenters who make up this site i am never left wanting for context before i watch the films discussed here. having heard a Big Picture Podcast episode about this film, the main detail that stuck out to me was the one about the original toy line and cartoon being cobbled together from several different unrelated fantasy and sci-fi pitches, frankenstein-style, into one uneasy aesthetic whole that ultimately made it stand out among a lot of the other more straightforward kids cartoon concepts of the time. i get why it left a lingering impression in people’s minds.

    for the first time in a really long time i’m newly awestruck by the amount of work that goes on behind the scenes to pull off any film production and this movie sounds like a lot of fun even though he-man was before my time. reading that they apparently play a dink track over the closing credits may have sold me on it, but i’m honestly in no rush to check it out. i’m just glad there are good options out there for all kinds of different people.

  41. “When you try to “dig in” to the mythology there is no there there. Who even is Teela or Fisto?”

    Teela is the biological daughter of the Sorceress and an unnamed Soldier “who gave his life for Eternia”. One day she will take the Sorceresses place but right now she doesn’t know about her heritage. Unlike her adopted father Man-At-Arms, who saved her as a baby from being sacrificed to a water demon and swore to the Sorceress to raise her as his own daughter and keep her secret.

    Fisto used to be a thug for Skeletor who terrorized the woods of Eternia in his name until he met He-Man, who taught him to change his ways and fight for good.

    (I’m not saying that MASTERS is pretty deep in terms of characters or mythology, but as mentioned before, it does have some fun stories at times and I thought it’s funny that someone mentioned two of the characters who actually were provided some good backstories as examples for “this franchise has nothing”.)

  42. Hard agree on the jokes – my reflection is that it shows how hard making a James Gunn film is, and how he builds the cast around the jokes he wants to tell.

    E.g, when the giant Skeletor hologram threatens that he will treat the heroes as ‘but worms under [his] feet’. This then gets misunderstood Skeletor calling them ‘buttworms’.

    It’s not a great joke but, in the abstract, there are ways to make it work. In TSS or GOTG for example, Gunn has characters defined by their literalism – the shark man and Drax respectively – it recognises that you can take up low-hanging jokes of this type – but you have to build it around characters the lines make sense for.

    Travis gives this line to Idris Elba – playing a character established as on hard times and past his best, but a competent, intelligent and capable man, the leader of the king’s guard. It makes no sense that he doesn’t understand the word ‘but’ is distinct from ‘butt’.

    This is emblematic of such a big problem – every other line is either a joke, or delivered with intonation suggestive of a joke even if it isn’t clear what is meant to be funny about it – but these seem to have been assigned at random.

    It’s such a fatal flaw because He Man is built around archetypes – and these jokes collapse them. The characters feel like deflated balloons as a result.

    Also think the fisting jokes go way too far. You keep one in, maybe. Not half a dozen. And not make it so obvious that kids will be googling what fisting is after. The art to ‘over their heads’ is that it goes over their heads! Not that they simply (hopefully) don’t know what fisting is so you can bring it up ten times.

    “Ram Man IS a historical figure” did make me laugh though

  43. “In the 1980s, filmmakers fully committed to their pulpy nonsense. Then in the 1990s and early 2000s they added snark and ironic distance in order to try to seem superior to the material. I thought we were past that attitude, because I’d gotten used to these things being entrusted to people who were fans themselves and therefore knew what was cool about it and how to make it work.”

    Couldn’t have said if better. Fuck off with this snark-snark meta nudge-wink shit. I loved even the cheesiest action movies of the 80s and early 90s, because even when super-absurd shit happens, within that universe, it’s serious stuff. Even with the dumb cheesy one liners, if comes across because characters believe or think they are being cool, self deprecating or funny, not because they are AWARE how silly it is.

    One of the earliest indication the SW Sequel trilogy was gonna piss me off was when 20 mins into THE FORCE AWAKENS, Poe Dameron meets Kylo Ren, and then cracks a quip about how he can’t hear him well because of the mask, and the breathing….and decades ago, SPACEBALLS got there first , with Darth Vader ripping off his helmet and Rick Moranis exclaiming…Geez it’s hard to breathe in these things. So they transposed a SPACEBALLS joke into an official SW movie. In other words, a spoof joke into a movie that wasn’t a spoof.

    So I blame Disney, who started that shit with Marvel. It may have started before, but my Annoyance Tipping Point was crossed by them. So yeah, Disney…easy to blame cause they fucked so much shit up.

  44. “Nobody cracks a joke when Starlord finds out what his father did”

    Except that revelation is IMMEDIATELY followed by a Hasselhoff joke.

    So, I still say…fuck Disney

  45. I have to disagree that Gunn is still getting the balance right. His last two movies have been off. GUARDIANS III went overboard with the allegedly hilarious bickering during serious moments, but it more or less stuck the landing. But then SUPERMAN turned that up to 11, to the point where nearly every scene was derailed by characters belligerently yammering about petty bullshit. All that banter completely crowded out the story and characters. Plus that goddamn dog is basically an undercutting machine. Any time any story element started being taken remotely seriously, Gunn sent in the dog to piss all over it. Gunn’s humor usually rope-a-dopes you into feeling for his ridiculous characters during the emotional moments, but in this case it just prevents you from getting close to them.

  46. KayKay, and even that isn’t a joke-joke, but a “The abusive parent is so clueless about being the villain that he tries to defuse the situation in the most inappropriate way” moment. He accuses Starlord of being the asshole here, because letting him be Hasselhoff isn’t enough to make him forgive the murder of his mother. Sure, on first sight the cameo provides a chuckle, but Gunn absolutely knew what he was doing in this moment.

  47. CJ, just want to chime in and say you’ve made a bunch of great points that I agree with wholeheartedly.

    Also the Mary Poppins joke you referenced also doubles as a sweet moment because Quill jokes that Yondu looks like Mary Poppins but then when Yondu asks “is he cool?” he reconsiders his snark and says sincerely “hell yeah, he’s cool” — (the ‘he’ subtextually being Yondu now, Quill is calling Yondu cool).

    Though funny enough, for better or worse, very soon after that there *is* the kind of joke that people here seem to be decrying. The Guardians land, the camera pans around them, they all strike a cool pose, the music swells… but then Mantis gets hit by a rock and Drax belatedly yells “Mantis, look out!” So maybe Gunn isn’t above that kind of thing 100 per cent of the time. But still, he typically finds the right balance. The majority of his work is achingly sincere and heartfelt despite the volume of jokes.

  48. I get that many people wanted the serious version, but I get that they would make this version. I don’t remember a whole lot about the cartoon, but what I do remember is that it was cheesy. I’m fine with the balance they did of cheese/serious.

    It’s definitely not perfect. It’s too long. It was fun to see Dolph, but that should’ve been a one line cameo. A lot of the jokes are really bad. I’m sad to say the buttworms joke made me laugh, but the scene of him running around the comic bookstore asking everyone if they have his sword was painful. I know modern internet culture dwells a lot on the homoeroticism of He-Man and Skeletor and the double entendres, but it was too much. The needle drops during the early Earth portion were egregious. I was afraid for a bit there that all we were going to get was one too on-the-nose needle drop after the other. It definitely hamfisted and ultimately dropped the ball on the “lesson” of aggressive masculinity and brute force are not the only way.

    But, overall, I enjoyed it. And the major reason for this is probably Galitzine. He was good as both the fumbling dork and the heroic He-Man. But that brings me to one part that I think they really screwed up, which is the lack of a romance. He’s an actor that has fantastic romantic chemistry with everyone he’s been paired up with and they should’ve taken advantage of that. They also should’ve taken advantage of his fandom. He’s been in several romantic movies and if they had played up a romantic angle even just a tiny bit, they could’ve gotten a lot more women out to see the movie. I’m not saying a romance storyline needs to be a major factor, but just something other than one scene of failed romantic tension/possibility.

  49. I’ve been thinking a lot about meta quips, record scratch deflation and why I sometimes find these things indistinguishable from torture sounds. It’s because they’re so often a cop-out. The jokes are often lazy bits of literalism we’ve heard a million times, but beyond that, they’re the quickest trap door out of having to do the hard work of creating wonder.

    We’ve heard those jokes a million times because we’ve seen a million toy/comic/cartoon blockbuster movie adaptations, which means we aren’t blown away by the special effect of a person flying or the sight of a character yelling a badass line while picking up a sword or a hero putting on their costume for the first time. The way I want to see that handled: a new take on flying that feels at least a little astonishing, whether that means it’s photographed in a unique way or it happens at a truly unexpected time or the method the character uses to fly feels fresh, i.e. they aren’t just clicking their rocket boots on and zooming into the air. The way I don’t want it handled: some wretched Seth Green-like side character mumbling “okay, you can fly now, I guess we’ve got a flier, that’s totally normal, if by ‘normal’ you mean ‘crazy.'”

    In Vern’s new review of The Furious, he points out its sense of “violent invention.” That’s what jokey undercutting so often exists to sidestep (maybe not always with the “violent” part). “I can’t make my movie special, but I can make fun of how not special it is.” “This joke in place of an idea.”

    When that stuff works for me, it’s because the movie manages to fulfill the promise of the set-up it just threw water on. A good example is Peter Parker learning to use his webs in Spider-Man. Your mileage may vary on that joke, but we’re prepped to see a dude swing around New York, and then he flails around for a minute or two, and then he swings around New York. The momentum is delayed, but it isn’t destroyed.

  50. Agreed with most here, in that it baffles me that they spent decades of development and $200 million to lovingly recreate Trap Jaw and Mekaneck down to the minutest detail, and yet they repeatedly write into the script how stupid everything is. They’re shooting for AQUAMAN or THOR: RAGNAROK and missing. Those movies did have silly jokes, but better threaded the needle between ridiculous and awesome, and also didn’t half-ass their thematic/emotional throughlines. MOTU is ostensibly about masculinity, but strays too far into parody, and undercuts its whole message by having He-Man physically beat the crap out of the bad guy anyway.

    And God help us, but outside of the meticulous production design and fun score, Jared Leto’s Skeletor is the best thing about this movie.

  51. Sometimes the tone worked for me (mostly Skeletor), but overall the script felt like it had been sitting on a shelf for a decade, left over from when everybody was trying to copy Marvel and failing. That can’t actually be true — it must be a recent draft they shot — but it’s hard to think of any other explanation for why they would make it this way. The joke of everybody choking on the smoke during their cool power walk actually made me mad.

    It also failed to prove its thesis, w.r.t. masculinity. Every part of “ancient wise mage seeks champion to wield great power and chooses a child because he’s different from his power-hungry predecessors, and also it’s full of jokes” was done better by SHAZAM!. So…just watch that. One thing I did desperately want to see was Adam telling off his former co-workers for their phony “compassion.” If we’re supposed to take the movie’s ideas of empathetic masculinity seriously, it needs to distinguish between authentic and fake empathy and it doesn’t bother to do that.

    I did like Roboto though. Robots are cool.

  52. I liked this one. It is fun. It is very GUARDIANS/RAGNAROK in tone and a bit choppy, but the cast and their chemistry is great, and it was fun. Idris Elba always brings it. And it is with a heavy heart that I must say that Leto is a lot of fun. I have no allegiance to the prior He-Man stuff beyond that I had a Man-E-Faces as a kid and thought he was super cool.

  53. Crushinator Jones

    June 22nd, 2026 at 3:06 pm

    I was thinking about this movie today because I found out – rather belatedly – that Roger Sweet, the creator of He-Man, died less than a month back. He actually lived in my town. I found this out because my son came home one day from a Costco run with his mother and said “Do you know who He-Man is?” I reminded him that I had given him some of the old toys (I had saved them, then found out they weren’t worth much of anything) when he was a little boy – he had enjoyed them and that’s how he knew the name. “Well, I met the guy who made him at the food court.” Queue me wondering what the heck was going on, until my wife showed me her phone – there was a picture of him and Roger Sweet hanging out together at the Costco food court. I recognized Sweet from the Netflix documentary, the guy who said “BOOOOONG”. My son described him as “a real character”. Apparently ol’ Rog just hung out at the Costco food court and asked kids if they knew who He-Man was, and if they did he would proudly tell them that yeah, he was the guy who helped make him. I wish I could say I got to meet Roger – truth be told I was always looking for him when I visited Costco – but I never did. Too bad. I would have absolutely shook his hand and listened to his stories. But he got sick, got dementia, and passed recently. Now I’ll never get that handshake.

    Anyway, I’m sorry to say that pretending to not give a crap and constant sarcasm was a Gen X thing but unfortunately it spread to addled screen-addicted Millennials and has cross-pollinated with stupid social media slime and Youtube content farming in the worst way possible. I guess it’s poetic justice that it boomerang’d back around and destroyed one of the few things that (male) Gen X kids really cared about. It turned something that could have been a truly genuine celebration into a Whedonesque gauntlet of emotional undercutting. Bummer.

    At least we still have MadBalls.

  54. “Unfortunately there’s a joke that (with the exception of Moss Man for some reason) these are not their actual names”

    The way I read the Moss Man scene was that Skeletor asks Evil-Lyn what his name is, and she hesitates for a moment because she has no idea and just makes up “Moss Man” because she can’t look incompetent in front of her boss. So even that name was made up.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>