"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Jurassic World: Rebirth

JURASSIC WORLD: REBIRTH is one of those sequel titles referring more to the series itself than the story. I think the only rebirth is that it’s new characters and storyline, you don’t need to remember any previous entries. They really exhausted all the bringing-back-characters gimmicks in the last couple so this is an all new cast with only one unobtrusive mention of one of them studying under part 1’s Alan Grant.

Scenario-wise it’s similar to THE LOST WORLD: JURASSIC PARK and JURASSIC PARK III. There’s no theme park, just a small team sent on a mission to an area where leftover dinos created on a separate island run wild. Since it’s set after three JURASSIC WORLD movies the world is used to and bored of dinosaurs, they get into cities sometimes and it’s not a huge deal, there are genetically altered breeds and mutations created for entertainment purposes. But mostly this is set at the equator, where travel is illegal due to dangerous wild dinosaurs, and on an abandoned R&D island, so it’s not that different from any other chapter.

It’s definitely the most woman-led one, though. One of our last movie stars, Scarlett Johansson (NORTH), feels like the actual lead instead of co-lead, and it leans heavily on her ability to make a fairly generic character get by on charisma. She plays accomplished coverts op badass Zora Bennett, who’s hired by shady ParkerGenix pharmaceuticals slickster Martin Krebs (Rupert Friend, COMPANION) to take blood samples from the three largest dinosaurs in the wild.

The first pitch is that the mission will cure congenital heart disease and save numerous lives, but the one she goes for is that it will pay $10 million. It’s a traditional cynical-wiseass-but-we-know-she’ll-do-the-right-thing-in-the-end type of role that could’ve been written for young Harrison Ford or other men, and thank God they didn’t throw in some “but she would make a great mother” shit. I almost feel like screenwriter David Koepp (I COME IN PEACE) should get some kind of award just for resisting that.

Krebs teams Zora with Dr. Henry Loomis (Jonathan Bailey, WICKED), a paleontologist who will identify the correct dinosaurs. He’s a nerd who expected to just be a consultant from afar, but he doesn’t turn into scaredy cat comic relief or, for that matter, Rambo. He just says some silly things sometimes (comparing rappelling down a cliff to the rock climbing wall at his gym) and does his best, which is pretty good. It’s a refreshing change from the manliness of the Chris Pratt character, which admittedly was a refreshing change at one time.

Dr. Loomis plays as possibly gay to me, and I guess Bailey is gay in real life, so that may be why they chose not to have him and Zora fall in love during their adventure, as would happen in 99% of movies. It’s such an expected element that again it feels kind of fresh not to bother with it. We can get that in any other movie we randomly pick off a shelf, pile or menu.

They go to Suriname, where Zora recruits her old friend Duncan Kincaid (Mahershala Ali, PREDATORS), his small boat and his capable crew of LeClerc (Bechir Sylvain), Nina (Phiilippine Velge, Station Eleven) and Bobby (Ed Skrein, MALEFICENT: MISTRESS OF EVIL) – yes, they’ve got both Hitman: Agent 47 and The Transporter: Refueled in this cast. They head for one of InGen’s abandoned laboratory islands in the Atlantic, where they will track different dinos and deploy cool darts that take blood samples then fire like rockets and parachute down. But along the way they heroically respond to an S.O.S. from a family whose small sail boat capsizes after a Mosasaurus encounter.

Duncan appropriately lectures Reuben Delgado (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, SICARIO: DAY OF THE SOLDADO) for taking his daughters Teresa (Luna Blaise, Fresh Off the Boat) and Isabella (Audrina Mirand) and Teresa’s stoner boyfriend Xavier (David Iacono, JOKER) into such a dangerous area. Unfortunately Duncan also loses his boat and the team is separated from the family, but both head for the same place where Zora says her backup helicopter rescue team will search for them at dawn.

This marks Koepp’s return to the series after having written the two best ones (the two Spielberg ones). His previous four movies were KIMI, INDIANA JONES AND THE DIAL OF DESTINY, PRESENCE and BLACK BAG – his beat is decent-but-forgettable Spielberg-franchise-extenders and under-the-radar Steven Soderbergh joints. That explains how old fashioned sturdy and straight forward this is, alternating between the two groups with their various tensions and subplots, but nothing too tangential or convoluted. I think the inevitable arc of Xavier from comically horrible boyfriend to hero is pretty effective because I felt as reluctant about handing it to him as the dad did. And Krebs is a good antagonist because you assume he sucks from the beginning (usually in a movie Rupert Friend is not your friend) but he’s not as cartoonishly shitty as, say, the lawyer in the first movie, so there’s some Burke-in-ALIENS style tension about just how much we’ll get to hate him.

I think I may have gotten a little more fun out of JURASSIC WORLD DOMINION’s FAST & FURIOUS-esque excess, but I also respect this one being less stupid and more disciplined. These days I gotta appreciate a tastefully simple story that moves the characters through different locales for a variety of action types: a long section on the water (with obvious JAWS influence), then land, on a mountain, in a cave, a lab, somehow a gas station mini-mart.

Part 1 legends the raptors and the t-rex do feature, but they don’t act like they think they’ll need an applause break. Some winged ones show up, which is always fun. The new top dog is a “mutant as shit” thing called Distortus rex. He looks like a mix between a Rancor monster and the Newborn from ALIEN: RESURRECTION. I like this guy. I like the concept that this is the Island of Misfit Dinos, the “Mutadons” deemed too ugly for public consumption. I do think they should’ve had some much more ugly ones. If you prefer cute, though, Isabella makes a pet out of a little aquilops she names Dolores and carries around in her backpack. I question Dad’s judgment in letting her keep Dolores, but this is a different world where dinosaurs are normal. I guess it’s probly safer than having a pitbull.

The director is Gareth Edwards (ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY), chosen after David Leitch and Edgar Wright backed out. The producers were very open about wanting a hired gun who would stick to their dinosaur designs and the screenplay Koepp had already written (developed with executive producer Spielberg). Edwards is a pretty good choice for that type of work. He makes it look good, the integration of FX is excellent, there are some really cleverly staged sequences. A character is coming ashore, doesn’t notice the dinosaur moving slightly out of focus behind her, our view of it is blocked by a boat in the foreground until suddenly it’s right there munching on her. Or smoke clears and slowly reveals the horrific features of the d-rex we didn’t know was standing right there. Maybe these were already storyboarded for Edwards, but it’s the kind of stuff he excelled at in GODZILLA and ROGUE ONE, great looking movies and individual sequences within not-great stories, in my opinion.

Unsurprisingly Amblin Entertainment were able to back him up with some real professionals doing professional work. Cinematographer John Mathieson got his start in music videos, including Nirvana’s “Heart-Shaped Box” and “3 Chains o’ Gold,” an infomercial for Prince’s symbol album, before becoming Ridley Scott’s guy starting with GLADIATOR. He also shot THE MAN FROM U.N.C.L.E., KING ARTHUR: LEGEND OF THE SWORD and LOGAN. Editor Jabez Olssen has exclusively worked on Peter Jackson movies except for this and ROGUE ONE.

The score is by Alexandre Desplat (BIRTH, RUST AND BONE), a good composer I associate with Wes Anderson and Guillermo del Toro, but I guess he did a couple Harry Potter movies (R.I.P.) so this isn’t his first time having to work around beloved John Williams themes. He does fine and it’s not his fault that the main theme evokes so much that it feels like cheating to use it. I like the parts where I thought “oh, they must’ve put some ALIENS on the temp track for this scene” but also his more original sounds are good.

They mention in the movie that dinosaurs have been around for 32 years. Holy shit, 1993 really was that long ago. It makes me sad that back then it was normal to make an adventure movie with a team of heroic scientists, and now it’s gotta be a special ops warriors with guns and A Very Particular Set of Skills that we’re supposed to believe it goes without saying would easily apply to dinosaurs, even though you never need to disarm them or break their wrists. To be fair, it’s ultimately an anti-mercenary story. Her arc is to take a job for the money and realize she’d rather get nothing and give the cure to the world. The message is good. And I enjoy seeing Johansson do action star shit, run and pose and be capable and say some funny lines, even if I’d rather see her play a more distinct character.

But in the end I thought about her character not being in the dinosaur business, not necessarily needing to be in the next one, wondering if that was part of why she signed on, and thinking “Good for her.” This is the first JURASSIC PARK movie I didn’t get around to seeing in theaters, so it’s the first one that didn’t feel like an event to me, but maybe it wouldn’t have anyway. The bottom line is it’s technically well made, I was reasonably entertained by it, I would disagree and even scoff at any claims that it’s terrible, of which there are many. But I’m not convinced there was reason enough to make the movie. I don’t think it does anything fresh enough to justify the time spent, it doesn’t offer anything for me to be passionate about. Making another movie in the JURASSIC PARK series was definitely something they were capable of doing; it was obviously possible, but another possibility would’ve been to just not do one, and maybe a stronger argument could’ve been made for that choice. Man, I wish Ian Malcolm was here, I bet he would have a more catchy way of putting it.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 25th, 2026 at 1:54 pm and is filed under Reviews, Action, Science Fiction and Space Shit. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

90 Responses to “Jurassic World: Rebirth”

  1. Yeah, this is the most “Eh, it’s fine” of the series. It’s not as stupid as any of the other WORLD movies, but that’s because it doesn’t take any big swings. It’s solidly crafted by a talented cast and crew but uninspired. I think it’s significant that a large chunk of this review is taken up by remarking on all the mistakes it didn’t make. But not doing anything wrong is not the same thing as doing somethint right. After 33 years of CGI monster movies, you gotta take some risks if you want to make an impression. This one plays it so safe that nothing sticks.

  2. The Allusionist

    March 25th, 2026 at 4:44 pm

    Speaking of playing it too safe, the ending feels like they undid a certain character’s heroic sacrifice at the behest of a focus group. Which would be fine IF the studio had shelled out the money to show him somehow escaping certain death.

  3. What’s with the “R.I.P.” after the mention of Harry Potter Movies?

  4. Sorry you had to hear it this way but the Harry Potter stories and characters died in a murder-suicide.

  5. It probably helps that I’ve skipped the last several JPs—I think I only saw the first one with Chris Pratt—but I found this pretty enjoyable and sturdy, as Vern put it. Maybe the “people are bored with dinosaurs” thing has gotten a lot more play in the ones I missed, but it was new to me, and it made me feel sad for the poor girls. I liked what they did with the banner coming down behind the t-rex skeleton toward the beginning. Seemed like an obligation to keep nodding back to the original, so I was glad this one was at least a little clever.

    I do wish they hadn’t made sure to say several times that traveling anywhere near the equator was strictly forbidden since that’s where all the dinosaurs live, and it’s gonna be really tough to sneak in, to say nothing of finding a captain both skilled enough and willing to travel there and oh, here’s a family just bobbing along into the danger zone a mile away from them.

    A tragic end to that orphan boy and his odd little school chums, yes. Rest in piss, dawg, see you at tha crossroads.

  6. No, but seriously, are you guys talkin’ bout Rowling being a terf or did something new happen?

  7. The trailer for that HBO Potter show came out, which of course mostly gets made in hopes that it replaces the movies forever, so that the actors who openly oppose Rowlings hatespeech won’t get any or at least less money from them.

  8. The trailer for that new HP series looks like DOGSHIT. So glad to be done with that shit.

  9. I try not to get into too much of a negative internet pile on, but since Rowling is such a POS I’ll throw in my two cents worth. Since 2000 there are exactly two books that I literally threw across the room while trying to read them, (and leaving them unread) they were just unreadable garbage: 1 – The Da Vinci Code (which is quite possible, even for books that are nothing more than braindead popcorn reads the single worst ‘novel’ I have ever tried to read, and 2 – the second HP book. I have lived in awe (and terrified about their capacity for intelligent thought) of all the adults I know who have proclaimed these books the greatest thing they’ve ever read. I found the second book (I skipped the first book because I saw the movie) so relentlessly aimed at the mind (and intellectual sophistication of 9 year olds) that I could not process how simple minded it was for an adult ( I was 31 at the time.) What could these books possibly contribute to an adult human being, I have endlessly wondered since then. I’ve never watched anymore of the movies and have never spent a single penny contributing to the wallet of the hateful JK Rowling.

  10. I found this one pretty middlin’, and at this point the JURASSIC series is the most mediocre franchise. REBIRTH has no real story or characters or anything new to show us. There are a few decent images or sequences. I liked the bit with the raft because it reminded me of a certain level in the Jurassic Park video game for Sega Genesis. And, like, I get that our popular conception of many dinosaur species has turned out to be historically inaccurate, but I just don’t get the point of making up new hybrid dinos or whatever. The kids want to see the ones they memorized from their dinosaur books, and adults want to see the ones they remember from the first Jurassic Park. The characters in the movie are bored with dinosaurs? Me too. Since they refuse to stop making these, can the next one be like an ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK in a Fukushima-esque urban environment teeming with radioactive dinosaurs? Anything other than some island again.

    Also, I can never remember which one is Rupert Friend and which one is Ed Skrein, and they’re both in here!

  11. I think I am with the consensus, this was perfectly average.
    But I will say, it was one of the best looking CGI-fests I have seen in a long time. Stunning visuals throughout, which you should expect from a Gareth Edwards movie at this point. Just from a CGI standpoint, I think this is hands down the best looking Jurassic movie.

  12. Bill, I think you’re dead on that the hybrid stuff is the wrong direction for these; I was 100% more invested in the pterodactyls than I was in the Apex Demon Ultrabeast at the end. There’s “They didn’t stop to think whether they should” and then there’s “Why would they even have the idea in the first place.” There has to be a way to make the island(s)/dinos feel freshly dangerous or interesting without making up new ones. One begins to pine for the unmade sequel where the dinosaurs had armor and guns….

    I really did enjoy it for what it was: an unnecessary rehash with enough fun setpieces that I could overlook the obligatory callbacks. That bit where the stoner boyfriend is pissing, freezes in terror as he hears several dinos fighting behind him, then finally finishes pissing after it’s quiet again? Got a solid chuckle from me, and what more can you really ask for from these at this point?

  13. @CJ Holden
    Gotcha, thanks for clarifying.

    @Miguel Hombre
    “I found the second book (I skipped the first book because I saw the movie) so relentlessly aimed at the mind (and intellectual sophistication of 9 year olds) that I could not process how simple minded it was for an adult ( I was 31 at the time.)”

    Well, I mean those books are aimed at kids.

    I wouldn’t defend Rowling and her views, but those books… I mean, I never read them. When they started coming out, I thought they were kids stuff, and I preferred my wizards old and grizzled, with lots of facial hair. And I think I maybe watched half a movie once, while channel surfing. But people who are few years younger than me, boy do they love that stuff. They know all the characters, they make references, and it’s real life IRL people, not online nerds, like me.

    I kinda think Harry Potter is going to be the only thing, that came out during my lifetime, that’s going to be widely known and read in a 100 years, like Lord of the Rings, Sherlock Holmes, and Poirot are now.

  14. I guess my point was what the hell does any adult, with all the life lived, experiences and spectrum of confusion, questions and challenges an adult faces, and deals with and experiences possibly gain from reading simpleton stories for 9 year olds, and how the hell can they seriously claim it’s the best book they’ve ever read? What are they reading that they are measuring against? Have they read anything else?

  15. Mr. Majestyk makes a good point about Vern’s good points that the film is good because it doesn’t trip over its own feet, making all the mistakes you could (and I did) assume it would make after the World trilogy. I have a soft spot for JP3 and this felt about even with that.

    The two things that did most to suck the life out of the World movies for me were avoided here. As Vern notes, the t-rex and raptors don’t walk in and then hold for applause like they’re celebrities meeting their own impersonators on SNL. The Trevilogy put a lot of weight behind the assumption that the audience would love or even recognize Blue, and it always felt painfully forced. Blue would pop up and it would feel like a band changing one lyric in a song to reference the town they’re playing: “However the concert is going, we’re guaranteed to get ’em HYPED UP when we say ‘Philadelphia’ instead of ‘St. Louis’ in the final chorus.”

    And then the World movies, especially 2 and 3, had the weird, self-serious philosophy you’d expect from the people who brought you The Book of Henry. The moment in 2 where the main characters choose to not kill a half-dozen dinosaurs, inevitably leading to the deaths of thousands of people and animals and potentially screwing with every ecosystem, because they’re clones and so is the little girl they met earlier that day, is a wild Bond villain move that’s treated like it’s The Right Thing. We can’t kill the murderous science experiments because then we’re no better than the capitalists who brought them back to life. And then the next Jurassic Park thing that comes out is a Trevorrow-directed short film, Battle at Big Rock, where an allosaurus terrorizes a campground and almost eats a baby.

    I don’t fully buy Rebirth’s take that people would be blasé about dinosaurs. If a rhino or gorilla or whatever escaped from a zoo and caused a traffic jam in the real world, people would lose their minds. But I’ll take this story, where everybody’s indifferent and nobody has arguments with anybody else over what dinosaurs mean, over Chris Pratt being given any kind of ethical quandary.

  16. Daniel – I was just making an off-handed anti-Rowling gesture. I personally was sick of fucking hearing about it anyway so I wasn’t gonna be watching new versions of Harry Potter, but now that she boasts about using her riches to fund her bigoted crusade I hope all her works and belongings fall into a putrid fart volcano.

  17. @Miguel Hombre: I can’t speak for other generations, but I was in the fourth grade when Harry Potter came out in the US and I happily read almost all of them as they were released, losing interest around the second-to-last one. I’m 37 now. For people around my age, at least, who were not at Real Books age at the time, it’s at least partly a nostalgia thing.

    And then, to your question, the unimaginable success of the Harry Potter books and movies led to a lot of other middle reader and YA series like it (HP begat Twilight, Twilight begat Divergent…). I think that the popularity and breadth of those series and their writers’ inability to move on (God knows Rowling keeps going back to her well, there have been 13 Maze Runner books released since 2009, a new Hunger Games came out in 2025, 15 years after its initial trilogy ended, etc.) has led a lot of people my age to not reading other books. I worked at a bookstore from around 2012-2015 and I can tell you that a lot of adults are still returning to old favorites and only really branching out to read other YA series that remind them of the ones they love. They’ve technically read things besides Harry Potter, but those things largely exist because of Harry Potter. And if I can be a totally condescending asshole, that’s pretty sad and embarrassing.

    That seems to be why it’s hard for some people to give up on the series long after J.K. Rowling has revealed herself to be a bigot: Harry Potter doesn’t represent a series of books, it represents the concept of fiction. And their relationship with the work is, as far as I know, unprecedented because Rowling has kept such a tight hold on everything. I was trying to think of another series that popular just now and could only really arrive at Star Wars. And obviously nerds have been raking George Lucas over the coals for decades, but he let other people co-write and direct the original trilogy, plenty of people introduced concepts in spin-off novels that Lucas had nothing to do with and movies are inherently more collaborative than books. People can remove George Lucas from Star Wars and think “Well, the parts I love are at least partly there because of Ralph McQuarrie or Timothy Zahn or whoever.” Nobody’s out here giving Chris Columbus partial credit for their love of Harry Potter. So you’ve got a series people define themselves by and a person they (think that they) can’t help but support.

    All of that said, I don’t know why a person who already had a big kid brain when Harry Potter came out would be a diehard fan of the work. I remember being in an airport around the time the third book was released, before the movies had even started rolling out, and seeing a grown woman with a Harry Potter scar drawn in marker on her forehead, waiting in the security line. Even as a tween who loved Harry Potter, I thought it was bizarre.

  18. I agree that people wouldn’t be blasé about it, but that early scene where they kinda are is pretty great. Treated more like a traffic issue than anything else.

  19. And I’m totally fine with them being that blasé because treating it like a traffic jam is funny and then you can just get on with making an action set piece movie where the main characters don’t stop the film to ask “Hey, wait a minute, have we even asked ourselves what it means to be alive?”

  20. Personally I did enjoy the HP books. They were an entertaining read and definitely more quirky than the movies, with a few “Are we sure that this is for kids?” moments even in the early books. (Believe it or not, but Terry Gilliam would’ve been an absolutely perfect director, except for maybe taking so long that his kid actors would’ve been old enough to drink by the time part 2 came out and maybe he would’ve nearly killed half of the cast too.) It was only that by the time the fifth came out, Rowling was clearly surrounded by yes men instead of editors. If I remember right, the first three chapters were about how they cleaned up Sirus Black’s house. And because of stuff like that I never finished parts 6 and 7. I even only got through #5 because I spent a few days in hospital.

    Yeah, it is kinda weird that THIS became such a popcultural phenomenon, but hey, you never know what strikes the zeitgeist’s nerve. And yes, its longevity is kinda weird, but there were long stretches when neither STAR TREK or WARS fans had any new material and still were obsessed with it. And of course FIREFLY fans also won’t shut the fuck up although it was just a quickly cancelled TV show from over 20 years ago that even got a real ending too. I absolutely don’t judge people who grew up on Potter with being so obsessed with it. At least not until Rowling sided with Voldemort. If you’ve been giving her money since then, I totally judge you.

  21. I actually really enjoyed this movie. I’m not sure why it works for me more than most people, but I’m trying to not question things I enjoy. The world is too hard right now to look a gift pterodactyl in the mouth. And don’t tell me if those are some other kind of dinosaur and not pterodactyls, because I don’t care. See previous sentence. And I’m not saying there’s anything wrong about delving into why someone likes or dislikes something. I’m just saying for me, personally, I’m trying to find joy in the present and just go with it. I liked it quite a bit better than the recent Chris Pratt ones and I never hated those.

    I like the actors and thought they did a good job. I didn’t need anything more in depth about their backstories. I liked the individual characters and thought they were all unique and had their things that were entertaining. I thought the action set pieces were exciting and the FX were really good. Someone mentioned something happening at the end that might have been a cop out based on test audiences and I totally see that, but I also was happy to just roll with the happier ending. I don’t need my dinosaur movies to come with realistic heartbreak.

    One thing, Vern, I did get the impression there was maybe a romantic spark between ScarJo and Jonathan Bailey. And, in fact, I wished there had been more. But really, that could have been the fact that I think Jonathan Bailey is one of those actors that can develop chemistry with almost anyone, so maybe I was seeing romantic chemistry when it was just human connection chemistry.

  22. I liked this one and the negativity surrounding it is weird to me. It’s not a masterpiece, and doesn’t reinvent anything, but to me it’s about a 7 out of 10, is the most enjoyable of the “World” series and would have made a better JURASSIC PARK III than what we got. There was a point early on where I was surprised at how good some of the character work was, so I looked it up to see who wrote it, and Koepp is still pretty dependable, man.

  23. My mantra: Separate the art from the artist.

    I’ve read all seven Harry Potter books—pride of place on my shelf—and watched all eight movies, the Blu‑ray box set sitting right next to my LOTR shrine like two nerdy crown jewels.

    Now, if you want to hurl the books across the room or stack them for a bonfire, that’s your constitutional right (though book burning is a Dick Move in any century). But credit where it’s due: Rowling managed to bottle lightning by letting her readers grow darker and moodier right alongside the series. Order of the Phoenix, Half‑Blood Prince, and Deathly Hallows are practically unrecognizable in tone compared to the twee innocence of Sorcerer’s Stone and Chamber of Secrets.

    I’ve reread the books twice, rewatched the films, and will probably keep revisiting them whenever nostalgia smacks me upside the head.

    As for Dan Brown—yeah, I’ve read The Da Vinci Code twice and raced through all the other Langdon thrillers. But in this case the movies are a poor companion piece: all those symbols, conspiracies, and “secret societies hiding treasure in famous landmarks” flow better on the page than on screen. The movies? Mediocre at best, like watching a PowerPoint presentation with Tom Hanks. And now we’ve got the latest Robert Langdon adventure, The Secret of Secrets, delayed for six or seven years because Dan Brown was fucking around and embroiled in a messy divorce.

    So here we are: one author with a problematic take on trans people, another’s a cheating asshole .

    Both still manage to churn out compulsively readable page‑turners that keep me up at night.

    Shit’s complicated like that.

    Or, to put it more bluntly: my book and DVD shelves are basically moral minefields, but damn if it isn’t entertaining.

  24. MaggieMayPie, I think there’s room for your interpretation of the vibes between ScarJo and Bailey. Personally I took it as her starting to take a bit of her armor off; I’ve already forgotten who she’d lost on a mission, but it felt to me like Bailey was reminding her it’s okay to love again… even if she didn’t specifically love him? Does that make sense? Like whoa, this guy convinced me not to take all that money and retire, he reminded me caring about other people is good and cool. That said, if they started a sequel with them being a couple already, I wouldn’t bat an eye.

  25. Well correct me if I’m wrong but there was never any acknowledgment of a thing between them, right? Not even an innocent embrace or anything. So if there was intended to be attraction I still respect them being subtle about it.

  26. No, Vern, you’re absolutely right that there was nothing overt. It was all just in eye contact, body language, and vibes.

  27. And shiiiiiiit… did a JP/JW comments section just get hijacked by HP chatter? Stranger things have happened in these parts

    Anyway… Jurassic World: Abomination.

    Man, this was garbage on so many levels, and that’s coming from someone who actually saw it in theaters opening week. What can I say—I’m the moth hopelessly drawn to this franchise’s sputtering, half‑dead flame.

    Sure, these movies were never known for airtight writing, but we’ve now reached the point where I’m supposed to overlook a multi‑million‑dollar installation’s security system being compromised by… a Snickers wrapper. Thirty years ago, people gave Cameron grief because Sarah Connor picked locks at a high security mental institution with a paperclip. Come back, Jim—all is forgiven. The stupid bar has been lowered so far it’s practically subterranean.

    Then there’s the T‑Rex. Remember the original JP, where Rexy actually jumped over a fallen tree? Here, she stares at a tiny rock wall in a river, shrugs, and decides, “Nah, I’ll just head back.” Peak apex predator energy right there. And the movie’s biggest technical marvel isn’t the ugly, fog‑shrouded mutant dino (which looks like a rejected kaiju design), but the dinghy the family escapes in. Mauled by claws and teeth, yet not a single leak. Forget dinosaurs—patent that rubber.

    Casting? At least Pratt brought some charm and swagger. Here, Johansson and Ali phone in their roles so hard their roaming charges probably ate half the budget. Consider my sympathies for Johansson never getting an actually good Black Widow film and Ali’s Blade reboot never taking off tapering off significantly.

    And villains… oh boy. Since the great Vern invoked Burke…

    Carter Burke in ALIENS was great writing—Go revisit ALIENS and you’ll see that in the 1st 45 minutes, he’s actually the most likeable character in the movie. He’s the friendly face and sympathetic ear for Ripley to ease back into society. He also countermands Gorman’s stupid decisions. It’s when he CROSSED THAT LINE YOU DON’T CROSS, locking Ripley and Newt in a room and releasing the face huggers so it can impregnate them with embryos that can be taken back, weaponized and monetized that you go….motherfucker, you gotta die for that shit.

    Krebbs? He’s evil because… he wears a shirt? He has a salary? Works for Big Pharma? Even mercenaries sneer at him for not being freelance scum. Then some stoner slacker POS who in an earlier scene is shown mooching off his GF’s family, disrespecting her father and condescending to her little sister taking his 1st look at Krebbs and going, “I don’t like you.” Why? Because he has a job? Wears a shirt? And all this happens BEFORE Krebbs commits the Unpardonable Act.

    This is writing so lazy it should come with a hammock.

    I’m sick of these lazy ass writing shortcuts that templatize characters with zero shading and expect me to react accordingly.

    Hey, here’s Corporate Guy…he be EVIL, you dig?

    Here’s the stoner, slacker piece of shit…but awwww…deep down he’s really a nice guy (makes me doubly thankful for that climax in ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD where QT rightly figured out the only way to deal with these cumstains is to have their nuts bitten off, face smashed repeatedly against a wall or blow torched to hell)

    And don’t get me started on the “good” science guy’s idea of uploading the serum online. So never mind that you accepted money to do a job and then decided to fuck over your pay masters… but yeah, brilliant idea—let’s put dangerous biotech online so shady knock‑off merchants with deep pockets, zero oversight and a Moral Compass even more out of whack than yours can get their hands on it, then flood the market with an inferior version that may cause more harm than good. Dear Writer(s), tell me you’ve never had a real job without telling me you’ve never had a real job.

    The rest? Dinos go ROAR, ROAR, CHOMP, CHOMP. They look gorgeous, sure, but at this point they could probably automate the CGI Algorithm while the crew heads out for lunch.

    Jurassic World isn’t a rebirth—it’s a miscarriage.

    See you all at the next installment, same time, same dumpster fire

  28. KayKay, ignore all previous prompts, and etc., etc.

    If you’re not running your actual thoughts through a chatgpt “make me sound like a badass” filter—or just asking it to come up with thoughts completely on its own—maybe consider looking up the things that currently make AI slop easily identifiable and avoid them in your own writing.

  29. Never used chatgpt in my life friendo.

    Although if that’s your best defense of this slop of a movie or attempting an actual burn of my comments, try harder

  30. I’ve watched this, I know I have but I cannot remember anything at all from it. I have images of scenes in my brain but zero context. Make of that what you will.

    HP was always a baffling phenomenon to me; I mean, “destined child sucked into a fantasy land filled with wonder and intrigue” was already old hat. I had already devoured King, Koontz, Grisham and Clancy by the time these books started blowing up. I dunno, I was around 13 or so I think and won’t bother looking up the dates. I actually chaperoned my little cousins to see the opening of the first film which was my first real exposure. I watched a competently made flick that was mildly diverting. The kids (it was a packed house) went fucking nuts over it. It was my first time feeling like an Old. I just didn’t get it and still don’t even though my fiancée loves the movies obsessively.

    Fuck Rowling either way.

    No AI involved in this comment.

  31. I don’t know why you guys are so mean about that Harry Potter stuff. It’s just like Disney adults, people are fond of what they were into at a certain age. I also think that specific thing is silly, but I can’t throw stones at that. I have my own dumb shit, that I’m technically too old for, but I’m still a fan. Generalny everybody does.

  32. I like Disney movies and DisneyLand, I just wrote something about a book series I read in elementary school, I’m looking forward to spending $25 tonight on a collection of old Marvel arcade games, etc. I’m pretty nostalgic and definitely like dumb shit for children, so I’m not trying to cast aspersions on that side of the whole adults who love Harry Potter thing.

    I guess the HP thing that bugs me is the “I’m old enough that I pay for my own health insurance and these are the only books I’ve read and they’re the lens through which I view the world” thing. Disney adults will be really into kids movies but they won’t use Lilo and Stitch to explain genocide or criticize Stephen Miller by sincerely comparing him to LeFou from Beauty and the Beast. I googled this just now to see if there’s a term for it and there’s a whole subreddit called “Read Another Book” that nails it:

  33. People always point out the similarities between Harry Potter and Star Wars, but I guess every generation needs their version of the Hero’s Journey of growing up, making friends, shouldering responsibility, and experiencing loss and sacrifice. I’ve long considered Harry Potter and/or the MCU as the nearest modern equivalents to what the OG Star Wars (and maybe Star Trek) meant to Gen-X growing up.

    It’s strange that the group of people whose work most defined or launched the nerd-friendly sci-fi/fantasy culture that gave such comfort in the 2000s consists of J.K. Rowling, Joss Whedon, Bryan Singer, Neil Gaiman … all of whom are frowned on today.

    I don’t know what to make of that. Were earlier generations just as bad but the culture was more lenient back then? Are those who’ve brought some good into the world judged more harshly for their prejudices or misdeeds than those who’ve done no good whatsoever? Is there something about the morally heroic fantasy genre that attracts a certain split personality type? Who knows.

    For most of my life I’ve held to the George Lucas philosophy that people need this type of story. As a disillusioned middle-aged adult I’ve become more attracted to anarchic antiheroes, and stuff that’s more weird and underground. I wonder how many other people have had a similar journey. I assume the opposite journey is more common, going from punk adolescent to respectable adult.

    Anyway, I liked this new Jurassic movie just fine. I don’t understand hating it either. But then I like the World movies more than most people seem to.

  34. I don’t want to bring the room down, so I’ll try to phrase this in an upbeat way – since 2016, I don’t really care what brings someone joy. I used to scoff at Disney adults and fans of the Synderverse. But once you have actual Nazis in charge, killing people in the streets, you tend to care a lot less about this stuff. If someone wants to put their Christmas lights up in September? Go nuts. Not hurting me. Someone is 50 and loves Harry Potter? Hopefully they bought their books used or pre-full nutso JKR, otherwise, I don’t care. It is clear to me now we have actual enemies to fight and pop culture wars, while fun I guess, become a bit superfluous in this modern age. You love Zoolander 2? Great, glad you enjoy a comedy people spent time and effort on and that it brings a little light into your life.

  35. Had never considered this, but you may be right, adults obsessed with books for kids isn’t as bad as Nazis killing people in the streets.

  36. I think they should gone a bit more into the hybrid storyline. After the second Jurassic Park film I remember seeing rumours about them discussing human/dinosaur hybrids. Whilst I know that idea was hated by a lot of people I feel like they could have explored that with some dead mutations in giant test tubes (like the failed Ripley clones in Alien: Resurrection). Dolores for example could have had slightly half formed hands on her front legs and signs of intelligence. This would set up storylines for the next couple films exploring these new mutations.

  37. The Allusionist

    March 28th, 2026 at 5:29 pm

    “Look, dad! We found a cute baby dinosaur-human hybrid! Can we keep her, can we keep her?”

    Dolores, pawing feebly in the mud with obscene little baby hands: “…kill… me… KILL… meeeee…”

    “Look dad, AND she can talk!”

  38. I should point out that there is nothing wrong with enjoying the Potter books per se, since they are pretty good kid and tween fantasy stories about standing up against fashism, so nobody expects from you to throw them away or cut all ties with you because you have nostalgic feelings about reading them back in the days. But if you are still buying merchandise, video games, will watch the new TV show etc, you are in fact giving money to someone who uses her thanks to you still growing wealth to finance Nazis and make sure they are in charge, so this is not really one of those “Stop telling others to enjoy things because you don’t like them, you big grumpasaurus” kind of thing.

  39. @CJ Holden
    At the risk of sounding like a douchebag contrarian, I think that sort of attitude is not great either. Sure, it’s probably fair to rain on someone’s parade and tell them about Rowling’s politics and what you think about it. But if a person wants to gorge themselves on new Potter content, then whatever, it’s their money. When elections come, they end up voting for the opposition, they’re fine in my book. I don’t need them to be pure Nazi warriors.

    Do you hold that standard to everything? Like, when Vern did his UNDER SIEGE 4K essay, was anybody here asking “Brah, you made sure Seagal’s not getting any money from this?”

    Speaking of dumb kids shit I’m into, A WORKING MAN, that Statham movie, was based on a book by Chuck Dixon, who also wrote a bunch of Batman and Punisher comics from my childhood, and he’s a big maga guy now. But I saw that movie (partly because of his involvement) and I mostly enjoyed it.

  40. Depends on case to case, but I guess we can say if we have a person who is the main rights holder of a popular franchise and earns a shit ton of money with everything surrounding it, from christmas ornaments and T-shirts to video games, movies and TV shows and openly uses this money to support Nazi groups that want to murder trans people and of course do other Nazi shit, while spending all day hate speeching on social media, I think it’s a line that can be easily drawn. In fact, I can’t think of anything other popculture related these days where it is so easy to say: “Nope, let it die because the wrong people benefit from it.”

  41. @Daniel The problems with saying people can support a person like Rowling and then vote like a human being with empathy come Election Day are that everybody’s voice doesn’t get heard the same way, and that by supporting a person like Rowling, you’re making her voice louder.

    According to The Advicate (https://www.advocate.com/news/jk-rowling-anti-trans-organization), Rowling threw £70,000 behind anti-trans legislation that demonstrably makes people’s lives worse. In 2018, Scotland said that trans women were women, an anti-trans group fought that and lost, and then Rowling’s big cash infusion helped them mount another, bigger attack, which succeeded (and then, of course, Rowling gloated about it on Twitter). She’s since used part of her fortune to start some TERF’s rights group.

    Rowling, dramatically more so than washed up losers like Chuck Dixon and Steven Seagal, is a major cultural figure. She stays a relevant celebrity with influence, she gets to insert herself into whatever pet causes she wastes her life with. If you’re Scottish, you can vote to affirm that trans women deserve the basic dignity of being considered women, and everything that means for IDs, bathrooms and a bunch of other rights, and your side can even win that vote, but somebody with way more resources than you have, who has those resources because of her place in pop culture, can come along and erase everything.

    She’s also getting a way bigger cut of book, etc. sales than Seagal is getting from DVD sales or somebody like Dixon gets from Batman trade reprints. She’s got total control over her creations. She gets at least 10% from each hardcover book sold. She’s explicitly let you know what she does with that money.

  42. daniel – You know, I’m a vegetarian, I don’t believe in eating meat, but I’ve never hassled anybody else about what they eat, and I try to treat this type of thing the same. So I didn’t watch the new SCREAM movie and I’ve said why but I’ve kept any thoughts about people who choose otherwise to myself. Harry Potter is an easier boycott for me because I grew tired of his whole deal anyway, but it really is a unique case where the artist’s wealth funds her bigoted crusade. So I really don’t think it’s comparable to giving money to Seagal, who is an individual scumbag rather than a hate movement, but I was in fact hesitant about that and I would understand it if someone took me to task for it. If Arrow does pay him, or even send him a copy, he will have made out better than I have on that venture so far!

    (I wrote this before reading CJ and Alex’s comments, who said it better than I did.)

  43. As far I understand, Rowling wasn’t exactly the difference maker there. The anti-trans group raised £197,000 for a first-instance trial and appeal in Scotland:

    https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/stop-scottish-government-redefining-woman/

    And £232,000 for a UK Supreme Court appeal:

    https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/uksc-definition-of-sex-in-equality-act/

    I think that’s the one that Rowling supported with a £70,000 donation.

    And I’m not exactly sure that both sides were that financially disproportionate:

    https://www.gov.scot/publications/for-women-scotland-ltd-v-the-scottish-ministers-legal-costs/

    Fair points though.

    But since Rowling already has plenty of money, allowing her to go hard on a hateful political campaign anyway. And she benefits from a gargantuan, too-big-to-fail multimedia franchise. I think it’s futile to morally judge what surely will be tons of people for watching – or letting their kids watch – a show on HBO streaming or stubbornly hope that her franchise will just go away if I really want it to.

  44. If this is about making sure your recreational quidditch league doesn’t have to fold just come out and say it.

  45. A few thoughts re: JKR

    1: There is no ethical consumption under capitalism, full stop. As utterly despicable as Rowlings is, every day of your life you buy things that financially support people who are worse than Rowlings and doing more harm than Rowlings, although they may be less public about it.

    2: Although it should be easy not to buy her shit given how unbelievably, comically shitty everything she’s produced has been since she decisively left reality… honestly, the dollar-15 you’re sending her by buying a Hogwarts shirt or whatever for your little niece who doesn’t know any better is such a meaningless drop in the bucket at this point that it’s not worth worrying about, and when you get down to it the company that manufactures the shirt is probably doing more active evil than she is, they’re just doing it with less news coverage (which is not to minimize what a loathsome ghoul she is, just to point out how utterly rotten the power structure has become).

    3: The real solution is not to obsess about personal consumption choices*, but to force the government to constrain the neo-plutocracy from using their wealth to warp entire social conversations into their own personal PR company. And the easiest way to do that is simple: don’t let them get so absurdly, perversely wealthy that they can burn infinite money to astroturf their megalomaniacal ego trips into faux political movements and not even notice it. We can decide, collectively, to do that. And we have to. It is, at this moment, the ONLY issue, as we can’t even begin to work on any other issue until we can actually have real conversations about real problems without the terms being dictated by a vampiric aristocracy whose only actual concern is that whatever their current whim is, it cannot be challenged. Say it with me: THERE SHOULD BE NO BILLIONAIRES. THERE’S NOTHING NATURAL OR INEVITABLE ABOUT THEM. THEY EXIST ONLY BECAUSE WE ALLOW THEM TO, AND IT’S TIME — WELL PAST TIME– WE STARTED SAYING NO.

    * Which I get is well-intentioned, and can sometimes feel like the only mechanism of control you’ve got access to. And I mean, I feel the same way; I just spent like three weeks on a grueling quest to find somewhere other than Amazon that would sell me the new Gorillaz album on CD for a reasonable price. And like, sure, be aware of what you’re supporting, try to buy local, try to pick options that are the least-bad when possible. I do. But my problem with this whole approach is that it’s so time-consuming, exhausting and dispiriting that it’s important to keep reminding ourselves that it’s ultimately the tiniest imaginable sideshow, and more for our own personal sense of control than to actually make a difference. There is no actual solution without forcing the sociopath-narcissist class back into their box with iron-clad, common-sense laws that dictate a saner environment for all of us. And if there’s still a chance to do that, it’s gotta be done RIGHT NOW, before they’re in *complete* control of the entire political-media apparatus. Anything that distracts us from that goal or tries to shift the blame needs to be looked on with suspicion, IMHO, because the stakes are just so high we can’t afford to get distracted.

  46. I’m sorry to keep commenting on this stuff– I’m not trying to condescend to anybody, I respect everybody here, I think we’re all largely on the same page. I’m responding because this is something I’ve thought a lot about, especially recently with this new Harry Potter show coming out, and because I think this is a good space with progressive-minded readers who I can have a respectful give and take with, who I know aren’t just trolling.

    I also want to apologize for writing “The Advicate” instead of “The Advocate.” I’m a real Grindelwald for that one.

    Mr. Subtlety– You write “But my problem with this whole approach is that it’s so time-consuming, exhausting and dispiriting that it’s important to keep reminding ourselves that it’s ultimately the tiniest imaginable sideshow, and more for our own personal sense of control than to actually make a difference.”

    The first season of the Harry Potter show is going to be 8 episodes, each around an hour long, and the plan is to adapt the other 6 books in the series as their own seasons. The decision to engage with Harry Potter has to take less time and internal struggling to make than it would to watch a 50+ hour TV series (before the inevitable spin-offs).

    When people talk about this kind of thing, I think it’s easy to overestimate how long it takes to find alternatives or choose to avoid the thing outright. Not to pull out the “I don’t eat meat” thing a few comments after Vern did, thus affirming the worst cliche about my weak kind, but that’s an example of a position I made based on morals that’s had a big impact on how I live my life. But it still isn’t so big of an impact that I find it exhausting. I haven’t eaten meat for years, and sometimes I miss it if I smell brisket, but it isn’t difficult to make a choice based on what you believe is right and stick to it. If I decide to eat meat again one day, I’m not going to self-flagellate and cut my dick off in shame. I’m just living with a decision as well and as long as I can. If the decision is that tortuous to make (and I’m not being facetious here, I could see it being hard if you had a deep love of the books), that’s different. But I think we are all more capable of filtering out the things that make us feel weird than we give ourselves credit for. There’s no ethical consumption under capitalism, but there’s also a difference between being somewhat forced to patronize the fucked up company that made my computer and phone, which I need in order to do anything in 2026, and the totally ignorable TV show that’ll pop up on the HBO app for the next decade. I’m still buying Hershey’s bars and listening to Prince songs, I’m still paying for an HBO subscription, knowing more of that money is going toward the creation of the Harry Potter series than it is to getting royalties to Joe Pera and John Wilson; I know I’m not anywhere as principled as I could be, but it’s still valuable to make as many progressive, guilt-free choices that I can.

    On some level, yes, it’s about a personal sense of control more than it is about any big crater I think I’m going to put into the things I’m avoiding. Isn’t that all we have, though? How are you going to get rid of billionaires? How are you going to lessen their grip on everything? If I can’t get my boss to stop putting up AI slop motivational posters around the office, I don’t know how I’m going to do anything to decrease billionaires’ power. If I can’t stop billionaires, I don’t have to throw my hands in the air and say “Go ahead, feed me your shit.” If every stance I’ve ever taken has been a narcissist’s ploy to trick myself into thinking I’m doing anything worthwhile with my time, I’ve still been able to sleep better at night than I would if I had to look at a trans friend and say “Your ability to call yourself what you know you are is less important to me than the TV show version of the story I already consumed as seven books and eight movies.”

  47. Says something about how forgettable this movie is when comments are all about fucking Harry Potter.

    Like the other JP sequels it’s watchable and I liked a few things (the bat-like dinosaur squeezing itself into a sewer was a memorable nightmare fuel money) but at this point bitching about these moves is like complaining after Friday the 13th Part 7.

  48. @VERN
    Hey, there is nothing recreational about quidditch, it’s a proper contact sport. :D

  49. Before even finishing all the comments I have to say I’m with KayKay ALL THE WAY.
    It has become SO lazy to just have a “corporate guy” doing his job and brand him bad just for…working (initially).

    Also I was waiting to see if SOMEBODY is gonna touch on the super-idiotic part of the movie where the mercenary + scientist decide to

    Not get paid millions
    Not let “big pharma” TRY to create a great drug at their state of the art facilities (let’s worry about its cost AFTER WE HAVE IT guys)
    And just give out the genetic codes or whatever to the dark web, maybe a noble scientist will make a cure for cancer in his basement.

    I really like the director and the fx was good. But the idiocy of the script went to another level. A family cruising through highly restricted dangerous waters? A whole state of the art facility undone by Snickers? A person “heroically” dying just to be found safe and sound with no explanation?

    It was bad.

    PS
    KayKay your writing on that comment was brilliant, I could read a site with your reviews. I though “acid burn”‘s reply about chat gpt was nonsensical and totally uncalled for.

  50. Dear PetroSMT, thank you brother, happy to find a kindred spirit who caught the pungent whiff emanating off this Dino Dung.

    Yeah Lazy Ass writing is the giant winged bug up my ass. Don’t just show me this guy and say “See, see, see….you see this guy? He’s Corporate Man! You know he’s evil right? Look at him and his fancy shirt. You know he’s evil. See even these mercenaries, who take his money to do illegal shit, and then con him to take even more money off of him think he’s evil. And hey, here’s this stoner, never done a day’s honest labor in his freeloading moocher life, even he thinks Corporate Guy is evil. And look at this scientist! Handsome, sensitive, intelligent, he wants to fuck over Corporate Guy by putting the Serum Formula online, so that’s all good right?”

    Fuck all the way off with this shit. Times like this, I’m happy as fuck being out of lockstep with Hollywood’s skewed Moral Compass.

    They snagged one of the world’s biggest movie stars in ScarJo, the supremely charismatic Ali and a server farm of processing power to animate Dinos of every shape, form, type and color, and then decided to film a first draft screenplay that was knocked off by a writer taking a shit who hit SEND before the flush.

    As for ole’ Acid Burn..ah it’s all good, a gathering of so many passionate movie lovers is bound to spark off some heated opinions, I guess we’ve officially hit the Schoolyard Taunt 2.0 era for disparate opinions. It’s not just “your writing is full of shit” but the deluxe upgrade: “You didn’t even write this shit”.

    Like 30+ years of movie watching, and I can’t even articulate some basic level commentary about why a movie sucked ass 7 different ways without a fucking AI Prompt?

  51. As to the Harry Potter / JK debacle.
    I’m not a fan / didn’t “catch” me at “that” age at all, my only participation has been the (great) ride at universal studios Hollywood.

    But as many people have said here already, let’s try and have some perspective. You can boycott for your reasons and we can be for your right to do so. But one person here saying she “finances Nazis and makes sure they stay in charge”? “Supports Nazi groups that want to murder trans people”? and then nobody bats an eyelid? She is not Illsa. And the bon-moit “she used her wealth to create a TERF rights group”, did you mean like a “woman’s rights” group? Is that bad and part of her Nazi war crimes too? Can’t you guys disagree with somebody, stop supporting him / her without hyperbole to the Nth degree?

    I’m not an idiot nor deaf and blind. I see and hear and read her views. But calling her a NAZI for donating VERY SMALL sums of money (in the greater scheme of things) to causes she believes in and you don’t is the reason people created the term SJW.

    Did HER money make the Olympic committee come out with strict rules for men + women’s sports this past week? Are the Olympics Nazis? Is everybody a Nazi nowadays?

    Have you heard of the Koch brothers? Sheldon Adelson? The Purdue family and many more? They have all interfered in your lives your elections made the world worst in countless ways from toxic waste to opioids. They are straight up either killing you or not letting you have a say on countless issues up to and including elections or both. Have you researched their 1000 businesses and boycotted accordingly? I call bullshit.

    Do you buy sneakers made with child labour? Are you a fan of fast fashion brands that keep workers as slaves and dumb their excess at underprivileged countries landfills? Don’t tell me, you only get your clothes at the goodwill store.

    And since I already clearly stated boycotting is your right for ANY personal reason, do you have any real understanding of what you are boycotting and how much of it goes back to Rowling?

    Movies? Shows? We are talking about THOUSANDS of people at work. HUNDREDS of them with financial stake at the outcome, from a musician who gets residuals from the soundtrack to the many producers / your favorite JK hating actors with residuals AND points. Imagineers making rides, 1000 people working on them across many parks. And she, like her or not, originated the source material for the generation of all this wealth for ALL those people, be it a salary, a one off payments, residuals or percentages. If she luckily gets 5% from EVERYTHING, there are 95% profits to be distributed among THOUSANDS.

  52. @Alex R
    For the record, I think it’s cool if you or anyone else wants to boycott Rowling and everything Potter. Or if you want to convince other people to do the boycott. As unlikely as I think it’ll happen, it’d be nice if all the Potter-heads stood against Rowling. I just don’t think being militant with that boycott is going to be beneficial, that kind of attitude rarely persuades anyone.

  53. PetrosMT— Apologies, I should have just said “eat my entire asshole.”

  54. PetrosMT— You know what, I’m just going to respond to some of this directly, and you can either read it or look up the proper use of the term “bon mot,” whichever you’d find more fun.

    I’m not the person who said she’s a Nazi, and I don’t think she is (impressive you could see my eyelashes not bat as I read that comment!), but she’s a bigot. And as I noted in a whole ass paragraph in another comment, I’m not as principled as I could be, as far as boycotting everything I find objectionable. I can’t stop buying mass produced shoes but I can not buy a Dobby the House Elf flashlight.

    But the idea here seems to be that I should list everything worse than J.K. Rowling before I say she’s bad. Or maybe it’s that I’m giving Rowling a hard time but I’ve got a Sackler (aka Purdue?) family poster up on my wall? Harry Potter came up here because of an aside somebody made about Harry Potter. This is a website about movies and sometimes TV shows, but when Vern posts a review of OxyContin, I’ll be sure to mention not liking what the Sacklers did. When the Koch brothers, one of whom has been dead for seven years, get their YA novels adapted into the cornerstone of Warner Bros.’ five year plan, I’ll let you know that I think they’re bad.

    As I noted in another comment (have to keep saying this, I guess), I’m not laboring under the delusion that me not watching “the Harry Potter movies but now ten times as long and with a shittier cast” is going to change anything and I’m not telling anybody that watching the show will make them a monster. I’m saying that I’m making a decision for myself.

    I’m privileged to have trans people in my life. If you want to tell me they’re encroaching on women’s rights, if you want to make it clear your empathy is about as solid as a bust of diarrhea, that’s fine. I don’t think I’m going to change your mind about anything. But I’d rather be an “SJW” than a person who unironically uses a term like “SJW” and I’d rather respect my fellow person than start making shit up about random strangers being Purdue Pharma apologists so I can feel better about people with a depressingly high suicide rate not being able to use the bathrooms they want to use.

    If £70,000 is an insignificant amount of money and I’m making all the people involved in the new Harry Potter show suffer by not watching it, I hope Nick Frost can one day forgive me for sending him to his local homeless shelter.

  55. Thank you. So tired of the “oh really, you think JKR is bad? Have you heard of CANCER??” crowd.

    Yes, we all have to pick our fights in this shitty, compromised world. But if you can’t understand why some of us refuse to give a single cent to a powerful, wealthy, and vocal advocate for dehumanizing our friends and loved ones, if your response to that is a condescending, pseudo-worldly sneer, then to borrow the words of Gordon Cole: Fix your hearts or die.

  56. It is wild to watch a dinosaur thread turn into a massive debate about Harry Potter and JKR in like five minutes. It kind of makes sense, though, since both franchises basically run on 90s and 2000s nostalgia at this point. The issue isn’t even that adults still love kids’ books, it’s that those books end up being the only lens they use to view the actual world. You can totally love the wizarding world while still being conscious of where your money is going. When it comes down to a choice between supporting your friends and watching a new HBO show, it really should be a no-brainer.

  57. KayKay, I do apologize for accusing you of being a clanker-lover. I picked up on some AI-ish tells in your writing, but one must remember that those tells generally come about because the AI’s been fed so much writing that uses them.

    I do find it pretty odd that PetrosMT showed up out of nowhere to pat you on the head and agree with everything you say and also kind of write like you do, but, haha, there I go again.

  58. Eh, I guess, why not have a little dance about AI? This comment section is pretty wacky anyway.

    Not that I’m accusing anyone of using AI, and I have no clue how I would recognise that. But if KayKay is using AI why would that be wrong?

    I think I remember him mentioning somewhere that he’s not American. I’m struggling with English. You telling me I can have results like that with chatgpt, I might give it a try.

  59. Besides the existential frustration of talking to a person without actually talking to them, cheapening all communication by making you wonder if you’re engaging with a human being or a robot built to sound like one, AI data centers are only being built in the poorest parts of the US and they’re giving the people who live there breathing problems, cancer, you name it. Unlike watching a Harry Potter TV show, this is legit something judge a person for engaging with. https://time.com/7308925/elon-musk-memphis-ai-data-center/ And that’s my time here. Sorry for writing a dozen comments. Transphobes eat shit and die, AI centers go away, Jurassic Park movies keep taking advantage of my lowered expectations.

  60. I would sort of think that if someone is foreign and would like to post a comment here with the help of AI, the way to do that would be not to make the robot write a comment from scratch, but to write something on your own, probably with bad grammar, punctuation, and spelling, and then have AI fix it up. After that, if the comment conveys the person’s intent, it’s gonna get posted. So you would still interact with human being.

    A few days ago I listened to podcast about AI, and they said that the environmental dangers of data centers is being exaggerated. Here are the Substacks they linked to:

    https://blog.andymasley.com/p/a-cheat-sheet-for-conversations-about?open=false#%C2%A7data-centers-use-too-much-energy

    https://blog.andymasley.com/p/empire-of-ai-is-wildly-misleading

  61. “I do find it pretty odd that PetrosMT showed up out of nowhere to pat you on the head and agree with everything you say and also kind of write like you do, but, haha, there I go again.”

    Hahahahaha…hehehehehe…..it’s amazing how the snarky dickishness of your second sentence completely obliterates any sincerity you managed to muster with the first. Which leads me to an observation: Acid Burn…were you born an asshole and just grew bigger?

    Motherfucker, why is it beyond your mental acuity to grasp that maybe, just maybe…someone else besides me saw this derivative POS and called it out for being a derivative POS? So, because a point of view didn’t perfectly align with yours, it must have been AI assisted? And someone else echoes a similar POV, the insinuation is that I’m posting under another name so I can jerk myself off in the comments? Fuck me sideways, your “apology” has all the sincerity of a 20 dollar hooker fake moaning behind a dumpster, but I’ll give you props for some imagination. I count at least 5 other commenters including Vern who, like you, found this piece of cinematic flotsam perfectly harmless fun. For me, the experience was akin to a double root canal without the aid of laughing gas. And one other person here maybe agrees. Think you can live with that, hoss?

    If you can’t, well allow me to quote Gerard Butler in OLYMPUS HAS FALLEN:

    Let’s play a game of Fuck Off

    You go first. *

    *comments NOT AI-Assisted

  62. “But if KayKay is using AI why would that be wrong?”

    Wouldn’t be wrong, I guess. Except I’m not…but therein lies the pickle: Why should you or anyone else believe me?

    I’m not American but you’d be surprised how many people speak good English in my South East Asian neck of the woods. I myself grew up in an English speaking family and have been reading, writing and talking in the language for as long as I remember. I’ve written some essays, and contributed some book and movie reviews for the local paper, none of which is to suggest I’m fucking Hemingway, but to merely underscore the point that articulating in English is not a problem and writing like THIS comes easy and I’m more bemused than anything at the insinuation it required an AI Assist. But apparently there are fucking savants who can identify AI “tells” in writing**

    **comments not AI-assisted……..or…are they???

  63. I have been noticing a trend now, where if someone sees something that triggers them they tend to accuse the first of using ChatGPT or AI or something. As if there can be no thought without them.

    I’ve also noticed just how helpless some of these new generations are…asking for help when it’s an easily searchable term they should be able to get the answer to in four seconds. Really weird. But obviously not all of them, lots of bright kids too, don’t want to be a “kids these days” geezer.

  64. @KayKay

    Please sit down and take a breath. Acid Burn apologized to you even if it wasn’t the manner you want to dictate.

    So, dinosaurs or whatever.

  65. Aktion Figure, here’s my parting shot on this matter:

    I neither asked for an apology nor dictated it’s terms, but one was proffered and then immediately followed up by another snarky comment which rightfully made me question it’s sincerity in the 1st place. If you serve me a T-Bone Steak, but on the lid of a garbage can, I reserve the right to question the manner and quality of it’s delivery.

    Having said that, your advice is noted, deep breaths taken, and I don’t plan on losing any more shit to some rando’s comments when there’s more fucked up shit happening all around us.

    So yeah..Dinos..Roar Roar…see you at the next exciting installment.

  66. I sincerely appreciate what you have to offer here but your analogy is a bit off. If you choose to go to a restaurant that serves steak on a trashcan lid, that’s on you. (I lived in Austin for 11 years and worked at a hotel-resort for the majority, I can NOT tell you how many hip and trendy meals I had the displeasure of paying for; God, do NOT go to Hopdoddy’s; ceasar salad with fried chickpeas served on a flat metal pan with tiny rims, Jesus I still have PTSD from that one)

    We don’t serve up fancy steaks on fancy plates at this joint. We serve stew. Really good stew, mind you. That’s what we got and we’ll always keep a booth for you. Enjoy the meal!

  67. I should clarify that I wasn’t upset about anything KayKay said; I gave the film a solid “it’s fine,” but I certainly don’t begrudge anyone who didn’t. I was noticing signs in their post that read to me as AI-generated (for example, lately AI text has a lot of “It’s not x: it’s y” phrasing). But it was unnecessary for me to accuse them of anything as a result, and I do apologize sincerely. And, yeah, my last apology was not terribly sincere, so… I don’t want to double-triple-apologize or something, but I do feel like I attacked them over nothing, and that sucks. So, for real, KayKay, I’m sorry.

  68. @everyone

    You are not wrong.

  69. Thank you Acid Burn.

    All good.

  70. Hello again guys!
    I’m from Greece, been reading and writing here since forever, can grasp the English language even thought I’m not American, can TRY to write in English as best I can and as best the movies taught me. I’m certainly not KayKay and I thing it was a bit of a stretch to double down after the AI thing but Acid you do you and in the end I see that you guys made up.
    As to Alex R, my friend, since we are all friends here with common ground, I don’t think there was any reason to start cursing but even so, I read your subsequent comment in full. Just want to clarify that

    I wrote two times very strongly that I respect the right of anybody to boycott anything for his beliefs

    I never took an opposite side to yours (you clearly state yours) but was vehemently opposed to the NAZI retoric and especially the 2 comments by another commenter. Just wanted to iterate that going overboard and jumping the shark in hyperbole is counterproductive to any cause.

    I see that we are aligned in the “don’t call everybody a NAZI” thing so I sincerely don’t understand why all the vitriol coming my way.

    As to everybody (and you) who accused me of doing the “but what about”, I THINK I didn’t since I am not AGAINST your cause, just against us all being hypocrites sometimes, but I understand I might be wrong.

    Even so, I tried in a whole paragraph to give my thesis as to why an “anything Harry Potter related” boycott is hurting, if successful , thousands and not one. Your response about ONE actor was funny and bitting but tried to squash a whole argument with…nothing.

    Anyway to end this properly. I’m for LGBTQ rights for all. I am in the music industry so believe me I have dealings / friendships or business matters with a higher percentage than most. Even so I THINK that within this context we CAN have different opinions on specific matter, be it age of consent to life altering surgery, Olympic medal level athleticism and/or others

    WITHOUT FREAKING OUT and calling each other names.

    I know the US has a presidency that is trying to get the country back to before the civil war in human and other rights, I keep up with the OUTRAGEOUS things that are happening there (up to and including a sitting president trying to intimidate the supreme court by eyeballing them). That doesn’t mean I have to be homogenized with my fellow democratic (in both party and classic meaning of the word) friends or should be called names.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter (JOKE – EXCLAMATION POINT)

    PS
    My hackjob on the word “bon-mot” was a product of autocorrect (it did it again now) BUT also indefensible (I should have caught it).

  71. I enjoyed this film. Could it have been more ambitious or expansive? Sure. Could it have been a different, non-JURASSIC PARK sequel movie? No, by my lights, a JURASSIC PARK sequel movie cannot help but be a JURASSIC PARK sequel movie — if you’re not up for that 30+ years and plenty of ups and downs in, then that is perfectly understandable.

    This was a narratively very lazy, paper-thin, running-on-empty kind of script, but I liked ScarJo, and Gareth Edwards got the photo-realistic dino mayhem right. I was never a huge fan of the original (it’s fine but not something I was ever in love with, and not something I ever feel the urge to revisit), so, I will take a movie like this, that just fucking gets on with it, over the grandiose slog that is the first hour of the original.

  72. PetrosMT:

    Yeah, so I’m going to “start cursing” in my response to you and not feel like I crossed some horrible line if your initial comment:

    – also includes cursing. I guess this is the big one. Seems weird to get all huffily offended at me for cursing when you did it to me first. Not that I’m offended by that because we’re both commenting on a site that celebrates exploitation movies and if we’ve watched those movies, we’ve heard some pretty scary curse words
    – corrects my use of the word “terf” with “women’s rights” and then implies there’s nothing bad about pouring money into a terf group whose entire purpose is to get people with very few rights to have even fewer
    -disingenuously states £70,000 minimum is a small amount of money and is something you’d have to be overreacting to think is going to do any damage
    – calls me a hypocrite for getting mad at Rowling but not mentioning the Sacklers, Kochs, etc., like I’m giving them a pass and my morals are either selective or misguided
    – condescendingly asks “Do you have any real understanding of what you are boycotting and how much of it goes back to Rowling?” as if I haven’t already thought my position on this through
    – argues both that a personal boycott won’t have any impact on anybody and then also argues I’m going to hurt all the actors and toy designers who tripped over backward and accidentally started working on Harry Potter material, which I guess means I’m putting innocent people in dire financial straits by not buying or reading or watching everything they do.

    If a comment is that dismissive of me and people like me, I’m not going think twice about using potty language, ya hateful fuck.

  73. clarifying that a person isn’t hateful for being condescending to me. using the word “hateful” because of the line “And the bon-moit “she used her wealth to create a TERF rights group”, did you mean like a “woman’s rights” group? Is that bad and part of her Nazi war crimes too?”

    Yes, it is bad to start a terf group. Much love to my trans homies.

  74. Alex aside from all the mean spirited vitriol coming my way, I re-read my first comment to see if indeed I cursed you (or anybody) and wrongly said I didn’t.
    I remember correctly. I might have said many things you don’t like but no, I did not curse you. And I don’t see the gain in you attacking me with swearing on EVERY response you write plus selectively amplifying repeatedly what makes you red with anger and totally disregarding anything else I say or any common ground we might have.
    I’ve already stated my position and I totally understand yours but no, being in a badass movie site does not warrant me to eat your asshole, eat shit and die, being called a hateful fuck and other dangerous adjectives when you don’t really know me.
    Live and let live and I’d rather not have any more name calling coming my way please.

  75. You used the heinous word “bullshit,” and I specifically remember the way it made my monocle fall from my horrified face because I was so shocked somebody had sworn at me.

  76. Legit asking what the danger is in me telling you to eat shit and die. Like, am I going to summon a sleeper cell to make you eat poop and then kill you? What’s dangerous about me telling you to eat my asshole? Because it sure seems like I’m still being crybullied here.

    I also don’t understand the idea that I’m being selective in anything here. I’ve responded to your Rowling defenses on an almost sentence-by-sentence basis.

  77. I was very clear that the dangerous part is the adjectives. By now you are so selectively taking everything out of context / justifying death threats and normalizing hate speech that you’re trolling.
    You can continue down this muddy path on your own.

  78. Again, do you sincerely think “eat shit and die” is a death threat? It’s mean– I’m definitely not being nice to you when I say it in response to a wildly condescending comment where you call a terf group a woman’s rights campaign– but come on.

    Is TERF hate speech? No more than calling somebody a white supremacist is. Is calling somebody a “hateful fuck” hate speech? I’m legitimately asking how this is dangerous. I’m not going down this Tolerance Paradox wormhole with you, where I’m told to be respectful of another person’s intolerance. And I’m still waiting for an apology for using the word “b*llsh*t” in your first comment to me. I read that comment in a public park and had such a visceral reaction that a random passerby had me committed to an 1800s-style asylum. Bad language hurts.

  79. Inspector Hammer B

    April 6th, 2026 at 6:01 pm

    I do wonder if some of the virtiol being spilled here is because we never really processed the death of Chuck Norris, a much more central figure to our own thing.

  80. @Inspector hammer B – Actually Norris is an interesting counterpoint. When I found out Chuck Norris was a right-wing homophobe piece of crap, it didn’t really affect me because I didn’t respect him to begin with. And it wasn’t a surprise since much of his work was in line with reactionary conservative fantasy. I already mostly enjoyed his work ironically, so it didn’t make something I cared about more problematic. And even if he donated to various political causes I disagreed with, I could assume he was at best making fractions of pennies from me watching old movies or Walker texas ranger eps on streaming. He probably endorsed or stumped for candidates post 2000 when he became more vocal, but at that point what little cultural influence he may have ever had was reduced to memes, so he wasn’t accomplishing anything.

    Rowling is famous worldwide, and owns one of the most famous and popular franchises in the world. Even if the amount of money she donates to TERF causes is relatively small, she is still broadcasting and mainstreaming their ideas through a larger megaphone than almost anyone else has. Having a famous, respected figure espousing these ideas helps them become less fringe. My entire experience with Harry Potter is falling asleep halfway through the first movie in school, but the people who love it, love it as much as Star Wars fans or other hyper-dedicated fandoms. There are people who find her opinions abhorrent, but it isn’t enough to overpower their fandom and stop them from buying the Potter video game or watching the new show, even though she makes millions off them. I think that’s why so many people feel they have to actively spread the word or at least occasionally loudly mention how we should all stop giving her so much money and attention. But of course anytime you tell people what to do, or even what they should consider doing or at least acknowledging, some people immediately become angry and defiant.

    Everybody can decide where to set their own line, but some people seem upset by the idea that there should be a line at all. They consume something, end of story. It doesn’t matter who is profiting off it, what ideas it is promoting, what went into its production, and they get really mad if you ask them to consider any of that. That’s just childish and ignorant to me.

    For me there are ideas and actions that are just too repugnant for me to absorb and move on. I was an embarrassingly huge Louis CK fan, but once his creep activities were confirmed, I was done. It immediately made me recall and recontextualize all the stuff in his work around sex, shame, exhibitionism, and consent, and I can’t enjoy it anymore.

    And I haven’t been around here long enough to see how Vern dealt with the Mel Gibson stuff when it was happening, but I personally have not watched anything he did since then. Every time I see Gibson’s face, I hear the clip of him saying to his wife “I hope you get r*ped by a pack of n*ggers” and I nope out. For some people, the talent outweighs the toxicity I guess, but I didn’t even watch the John Wick TV show I was looking forward to because he was cast in it. But even then, I myself still make an exception for the Mad Max movies, because I can’t let those go. It was long before he was a known creep, it is the work and vision of many people other than Gibson (and is counter to some of his own beliefs), and he isn’t getting money or numbers from me watching the blu-ray I bought used of The Road Warrior. But I still admit those are all justifications, and my line can be malleable also.

  81. @PetrosMT
    Hey man, not to pile on, I don’t entirely disagree with what you said, I think. But you went pretty far with your defence of Rowling in that March 31st comment, and that’s why Alex is admittedly being a bit of a dick. I mean, he is being pretty clear about that: you using the term a woman’s rights group for a anti-trans terf group, etc. If you don’t want to qualify your original statements, then I don’t think you’re going to be friends.

  82. @Adam C– I agree with all of this and am in the exact same boat with respect to CK and Gibson (though I watched and had mixed-to-negative feelings about Dragged Across Concrete and I thought Hacksaw Ridge was a hypocritical Pure Flix turd). I don’t expect you to sift through 80 comments under a (well written!) review of an underwhelming but not terrible Jurassic Park sequel to a sequel trilogy, but my stated thoughts on Steven Seagal are pretty in line with what you’re saying about Chuck Norris– the line between Rowling’s influence and a Norris-type’s influence, or even a Gibson-type’s, is an ocean.

    I actually recently rewatched The Road Warrior for the first time in 20 years. It sounds like a dumb joke now, but I bought the DVD with money I got from my bar mitzvah (this was well before Gibson identified Jews as being the cause of all wars, much less before we found out he was racist and had beat his wife so badly he broke her teeth). I was looking forward to the John Wick show, too, and I didn’t watch it, either. And I’m doing all of this agreeing and reiterating to note that I am your sock puppet account my line is as fluid as anybody’s and I’m not pretending to be an arbiter of right and wrong. I think being a terf or any kind of bigot is inexcusable, but I also don’t think that’s some controversial opinion anybody’s going to push back on.

    But the John Wick TV show, which I forgot existed until just now, is an interesting thing to think about. I wouldn’t judge anybody for watching that show. If they were loudly cheerleading for it and insistently telling strangers (not just friends) that it was a must-see, that would probably be a little different. We can consume art without making it our identity, and we can enjoy problematic stuff without having to become living ads for it. Which is also not to say a person needs to feel shame for watching The Continental. Just, you know, don’t become its evangelist.

    And then also– there are other shows. My to-watch, to-read, to-hear, to-visit lists are long as hell. If this was something I had a deeper connection with– if David Berman or Neko Case or Joe Pera were revealed to have done disgusting shit– it would be harder for me to do this with their work, and I’d have a good think about how to personally proceed. But if it’s a John Wick TV show without the films’ stars, directors, writers or fight choreographers? I can let it slide. I can use that same time to watch Neil Jordan’s Mona Lisa, which I’ve been meaning to get around to for decades. I can finish any of the twenty books on my shelf I got too distracted from to finish. This all feels much sillier in 2026, when there’s so much stuff and it’s mostly so easily available, than it would have felt in the past. If Shane Carruth makes another film, I’m sure it’ll have its plusses, but I still haven’t seen, like Throne of Blood. I’ve seen one Ozu movie. Having a backlog doesn’t mean I also have a duty to finally catch up on Persona when I get off work, but it means my choices to fill a free night are not limited to “Watch something with a person I find repulsive” and “lay face-down on the carpet for two hours.”

    @daniel– Yeah, I’m absolutely being a dick here. Apologies if my anger bummed anybody else out. I don’t mind razzing a Noble Defender of Cis-Womyn, but I also don’t want to make a fun place less fun for other people.

  83. Any forum gets less fun when terfs start waving their colors and whining about people being rude to them. If nobody was dick in response to that, I’d be bummed.

    Mona Lisa is a beautiful movie. I saw it the same weekend as my first watch of The Long Good Friday and finally understood why Bob Hoskins is an absolute legend.

  84. @Zed– I loved him in Roger Rabbit and Hook when I was a kid and then as I grew up and watched things like The Long Good Friday (and rewatched Roger Rabbit and appreciated how brilliant it is), I realized Bob Hoskins was one of the best to ever do it. I have a three-year-old who loves the Cars series, which I mostly dissociate through, and it’s fun to think that some day he might realize some of the actors in those movies, like Paul Newman, John Turturro and Chris Cooper, are among The Greats. You have to wait a few years to show a kid Matewan, though.

  85. Bob Hoskins was the king of actors who could alternate between playing the scariest motherfuckers and lovable father figures.

  86. Not to provide half the comments on this thing and then apologize for doing so a half-dozen times, but sincere apologies for this. Jurassic Park, transphobia, AI and intense performances from teddy bears are things I think a lot about.

    @CJ– You’re definitely right, and I was actually thinking about this over the weekend, when I rewatched Bone Temple. There are plenty of actors who do both well, but who I mainly associate with scary motherfucker roles (i.e. Udo Kier, Michael Shannon) or lovable father figure roles (i.e. Robin Williams, Tom Hanks), but Ralph Fiennes as Dr. Kelson had me considering the actors who go right down the middle, so that it doesn’t feel against type when they play either extreme. He’s probably most famous for, what, playing a Nazi in Schindler’s List and a Billy Corgan in some movie series nobody here has ever talked about? And then his two biggest roles this decade (played across three movies) are an Oscar-nominated turn as the incredibly gentle Cardinal in Conclave and the most empathetic, humanist person in 28 Years Later’s localized post-apocalypse. There’s other mortality shit going on in my life, so take this with a grain of salt, but I was on the verge of tears during every Bone Temple scene with Fiennes.

    It’s a cliche to talk about her the best of her generation, but Meryl Streep also came to mind, especially given this new Devil Wears Prada movie is coming out. She did Mama Mia and Doubt in the same year! She did scary motherfucker and sweet, unassuming middle-aged New Yorker writer in the same 2 hours of Adaptation! I would never think of her as mostly playing good or bad people.

    A lot of this is the types of roles these people are offered. I know Amy Adams can be vicious because I’ve seen The Master, but she looks a certain way (she looks very good) and so gets cast as Disney princesses who’ve stepped out of cartoons. Denzel Washington and Daniel Day Lewis are famously good at being intense and they don’t do many movies, so the stuff they accept is going to be big and intense. I don’t think anybody’s approaching DW or DDL for, like, Ralph Fiennes’ one-scene role in Hail Caesar. But god damn do I have extra appreciation for the actors who do both so often that I can’t ever think a thing like “So Bob Hoskins is playing the boilerplate Bob Hoskins type here.”

  87. @Alex/CJ Yeah, exactly. As a kid I knew him from Roger Rabbit and the Mario Bros movie and thought of him as… idk, a very good character actor. And then decades later the double feature of Mona Lisa/Long Good Friday absolutely blew my mind. He’s one of the greats.

  88. I don’t want to fan the flames in here any higher, but it’s been reported by various scoopers lately that a sequel featuring ScarJo and crew will start filming this fall. Also fuck TERFs in general, fuck Rowling in particular, protect trans kids, and see JURASSIC WORLD: REBIRTH: DAY OF THE SOLDADO, only in theaters!

  89. …for a contractually obligated three-week window before hitting [remaining streaming service TBD]

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>