"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas

I know prequels are always divisive, but I’m usually willing to give them a shot. When I revisited THE FLINTSTONES for my summer of ’94 retrospective, I decided it was time to finally found out how it all began. Then I waited two years. But now I have watched it.

THE FLINTSTONES IN VIVA ROCK VEGAS comes from the same director as the original, Brian Levant (PROBLEM CHILD 2), but not until six years later, with almost an entirely new cast. According to a 2024 SyFy.com article, Universal wanted to film two sequels back-to-back, but John Goodman didn’t want to do another one. Levant theorized, “I think it came down to one thing: people coming up to him in airports and going ‘Yabba-dabba-doo!’ He didn’t like it.”

So they made it a prequel about the characters entering adulthood, but oddly they didn’t cast people who look that age, so it doesn’t really feel like a good explanation for the recast. These actors are in fact younger, but I’m afraid the main difference between John Goodman at 42 and Mark Addy (JACK FROST) at 36 is not their ages. Addy does fine, and Kristen Johnston (AUSTIN POWERS: THE SPY WHO SHAGGED ME) is pretty good as Wilma (is it weird that she reminded me of Emma Stone here?). Stephen Baldwin (POSSE) is definitely not as good as Rick Moranis at playing Barney, but honestly the problem is mainly just that we know he’s Stephen Baldwin and that they let him have ‘90s hair. I can’t honestly say he’s bad in it.

The one casting that I think is an unqualified upgrade is Jane Krakowski (NATIONAL LAMPOON’S VACATION) as Betty. That’s not a swipe at the unpopular casting of Rosie O’Donnell (the only part 1 cast member to return with a voice cameo, playing an octopus masseuse) but just an acknowledgement that Krakowski has that rare Shelley Duvall/Margot Robbie quality of a heightened cartoon character, a person whose presence somehow captures the physical and spiritual essence of a drawing while adding literal and figurative dimension. (Some of it’s in the eyes, I think.)

She’s also believable as a hot rollerskating drive-in waitress who is open-minded and adventurous enough to say yes when customer Fred asks her out on a date. Yeah, the gimmick is that the future Flintstones and Rubbles meet when they go on a mismatched double date. Credited screenwriters Deborah Kaplan & Harry Elfont (CAN’T HARDLY WAIT, JOSIE AND THE PUSSYCATS) and Jim Cash & Jack Epps (TOP GUN, DICK TRACY) obviously knew they needed a sitcom premise, and they went for the one about the rich girl dating the working class guy.

We learn that young Wilma hates her privileged life and dreams of leaving her mansion to mingle with the hoi polloi in Bedrock. Specifically she wants to go bowling, but her friends think she’s joking. There’s a cheesy dude named Chip Rockefeller “of the Mesozoic Rockefellers” (Thomas Gibson, BARCELONA) trying to woo her all the time, and since he’s a rich priss he plays polo on a weird kangaroo dinosaur?

Wilma runs away and meets Betty, who mistakes her for a poor person, and Wilma plays along so that they can become friends and roommates. Her fancypants mom (Joan Collins replacing Elizabeth Taylor) shows up to visit right when she was about to fess up, but the bigger issue is when Fred isn’t accepted by her classist family and friends. He worries that she’ll never marry a guy who works at the rock quarry and lives in a trailer park, so when Chip invites them to the opening of his casino in Rock Vegas Fred plans to win money gambling and buy Wilma an impressive ring. But Chip (who’s really just trying to marry into Wilma’s family fortune) frames him for stealing Wilma’s heirloom pearl necklace.

Betty needs a subplot so she mistakenly thinks she sees Barney feeling a lady’s boobs and then when she gets hit on by rock star Mick Jagged (Alan Cumming, GET CARTER) she starts hanging out with him. Primitive versions of pop culture figures were obviously a Flintstones tradition that needed to be addressed. I don’t blame them. John Taylor from Duran Duran also appears as the bassist, Keith Rockhard.

Jagged is actually Cumming’s secondary role in the movie. His larger contribution is playing The Great Gazoo, the wish-granting alien introduced halfway through the last season of The Flintstones, and considered by some to be when the show “jumped the shark.” (Original Gazoo voice Harvey Korman plays Wilma’s dad here.) VIVA ROCK VEGAS opens with CG reminiscent of MARS ATTACKS! to introduce Gazoo with his people in space. That they find him so annoying they send him on a mission to study earthling mating habits just to get rid of him is a pretty good meta joke about the character. Of course, it’s always weird when these adaptations feel the need to both include a character and say that the character sucks.

In live action he’s still not a fun character, but I do like their way of doing him. It looks like it’s live action of Cumming in makeup for the head and then animation for the tiny body. At first I thought it was a puppet, but the hands sometimes move too well for that. Either way, stylishly goofy.

The best part about setting it in Vegas is that they got Ann-Margret (a celebrity guest on the actual cartoon) to record an eccentric new take on “Viva Las Vegas” for a sightseeing montage. As I’ve mentioned in a review or two I’ve gone on trips to 21st century Las Vegas with friends who like to stay at the Golden Nugget, so I was happy to see it represented as the Molten Nugget.

Since I never saw this before and it wasn’t as pop-culturally dominant as the first one I forgot it was even a theatrical release, but it’s clearly way too expensive not to be. I still enjoy seeing all the sets and props they made to look like cartoon rocks and bones and things: all these cars, a tour bus, the exterior and interior of the Sloghoople mansion, a huge carnival with working ferris wheels and things (plus a rollercoaster running across cg brontosaurus necks and tales), a bowling alley with real monkeys that put the pins in place, multiple casinos and luxury hotels, the list goes on.


One of the “modern technology but really it’s just dinosaurs doing menial tasks” gags is a remote control that has a little pterodactyl that flies out of it to actually do the turning on or off. Even though it’s c.g. it’s done by the Jim Henson Creature Shop. But most of the dinosaurs are puppets, and there are so many of them.

It’s also cool just to see flat painted scenery like this:


I think we can all agree we didn’t need to see how The Flintstones began, but I guess we didn’t need to see any other story about them either. Since it’s a prequel we get their first date, which includes other firsts, like Fred showing Wilma how to bowl (they float on their tip toes in loving slow motion) and winning an egg that hatches into Baby Dino (voiced by Mel Blanc in archival recordings years after his death) and he saves the day by pushing them together for a good night kiss when Fred was only looking for a handshake.

At the end they get married in Vegas, with the officiant holding the Holy Slab, and there’s a huge dance number. It’s weird to see that many people hoofing around barefoot. I wonder how much they had to worry about cleaning their feet between takes?

They truly don’t make movies like this anymore, for bad and good. I’m too old to think of 2000 as a bygone, less enlightened era, so I was a little surprised that there’s a mild gay panic joke after Barney falls on top of Fred in their bunk beds.


I prefer the not problematic innuendo of Wilma reacting orgasmically after they’ve ended their date and Fred’s parting “Yabba-dabba-doo!” causes her apartment to shake.


I guess I can sort of respect that they don’t try to make her into a girl power icon, since that would be so forced. When Wilma and Fred fantasize about owning a house she somehow sees his daydream of coming home to her mowing the lawn, so she frowns and changes it to her preferred dream of him mowing the lawn and she comes out pregnant and gives him lemonade. Yeah, I’m glad that’s what you want, Wilma, because that’s your future!

As in the first one there are glimpses of neanderthals as an underclass in Bedrock, but also it’s noticeable that most of the Black people on screen are in servant type roles. There’s a limo driver, a couple bodyguards, a jazz band playing for mostly white partygoers. I’m not saying it’s all that degrading or anything, just noting that actors can’t escape typecasting even in an entirely manufactured cartoon world of silliness. Interesting.

John Cho has a bit part as a valet driver. This is a few years before BETTER LUCK TOMORROW and HAROLD & KUMAR GO TO WHITE CASTLE, so I guess he was mainly known as “MILF guy #2” in AMERICAN PIE. It is also reportedly Kristen Stewart’s first film, playing “Ring Toss Girl” at the carnival, but it’s uncredited and you can’t see her face, so I don’t know.

THE FLINTSTONES IN VIVA ROCK VEGAS did not make back its budget at the box office, it ended the movie franchise, and also got poor reviews and four Razzie nominations. Like so many Razzie nominees it’s really not worth hating; other than having a dinosaur fart joke within the first 5 minutes it’s not particularly bad. It just can’t get past what we learned in the 1994 film, and also in some of the old TV specials: feature length is too long to be mildly amused by this joke. It has many talented professionals working very hard to make it happen, so it still has the novelty surface pleasures of a live action Flintstones. But it’s less novel, since it’s the second time. I guess I don’t regret getting around to it, but I’m not a role model.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 8th, 2026 at 3:50 pm and is filed under Reviews, Comedy/Laffs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

17 Responses to “The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas”

  1. I just checked and this sequel had an even higher budget than the original! From $40+ mil to between $58-83 mil for the sequel (gotta love that Hollywood math, I wish I could leave a $15 mil margin of error in my finances). Considering the recasting with smaller names, that all must have gone to the production design and effects you detailed. Wild that they thought a six years later prequel was worth this level of investment and theatrical release, this feels like exactly the kind of thing that would be an early 2000s cheapie DTV sequel. This even got a painted Drew Struzan poster! https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81vvaoDXCHL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg

    I might actually watch this out of nostalgia for big stupid physical productions. Plus I had a crush on Kristen Johnston as a kid watching 3rd Rock From the Sun. Plus Jane Krakowski is great and adorable, I think you are right on the money describing her human-cartoon quality. The commitment and energy she brought to silly ass 30 Rock and Kimmy Schmidt lines always worked. She is also aging like fine wine, my wife watched the show Schmigadoon with Krakowski a few years ago and I genuinely don’t understand how a woman in her mid-50s at the time could still have legs like that.

  2. As mentioned in the comments for the first movie, there is a lot to like about it and in some ways it is the better adaptation, but it feels also oddly cheap compared to the first. Can’t believe the budget was higher. Some of the puppets look in close-ups at times almost like something from a Charles Band movie.

    And it’s of course it’s interesting that while the first part went for well established character actors, they went this time for “hot” ones. Addy was still on everybody’s mind for THE FULL MONTY. Johnston was a two time Emmy winner (out of three nominations) for 3rd ROCK FROM THE SUN. Krakowski was on ALLY MCBEAL, one of THE defining late 90s TV phenomenons. And Baldwin was a Baldwin.

    Of course in the end it’s Alan Cumming’s movie. He steals in both of his roles most of the movie if you ask me.

    Fun fact: I talked about the quite brillant German dub of the original cartoon here a few times and Gazoo was named here “Galaxius from Saxilus” and spoke with a heavy Saxon dialect. Sadly they didn’t do that for the movie.

  3. About eight years ago I watched and reviewed every theatrically-released movie based on a Hanna-Barbera cartoon and Stephen Baldwin’s hair is the only thing I remember from this one, besides the sets. Also one of the early shots of Barney and Fred in their car looks just like that creepy shot of the old couple smiling at each other near the beginning of Mulholland Drive. You’re right to point out his hair. It is weird. It doesn’t look like the cartoon Barney or the Rick Moranis Barney, which wouldn’t bother me because who cares about source material-accurate styling in a Flintstones movie, but it’s so specifically bizarre that you’d expect it to only be there to continue a precedent.

    The other weird Stephen Baldwin thing is that he became born again after 9/11. In 2000, he starred in a Flintstones movie with a bunch of dinosaur puppets and then one year later, he’d decided that dinosaurs were a hoax created to disprove god.

  4. @VERN
    “is it weird that she reminded me of Emma Stone here?”

    That’s gotta be their voice, right?

    “His larger contribution is playing The Great Gazoo, the wish-granting alien introduced halfway through the last season of The Flintstones, and considered by some to be when the show “jumped the shark.”

    I actually always liked The Great Gazoo. It’s like one of those things where you watch something from before your time and really like it, but then you found out it’s no one’s fan favorite. See also: Scrappy-Doo, Godzooky from the GODZILLA cartoon, or, I dont know, the whole NEW ADVENTURES OF HE-MAN cartoon.

    @Alex R
    “About eight years ago I watched and reviewed every theatrically-released movie based on a Hanna-Barbera cartoon”

    Interesting, did you review the Macaulay Culkin’s RI¢HIE RI¢H movie or were you, like, “It doesn’t have Irona the robot maid in it, so it’s clearly not based on the ’80’s cartoon, and also it doesn’t have the best character in it, Irona the robot maid, so why even bother with this movie?”

  5. @daniel There is indeed a RI¢HIE RI¢H review here

    https://outlawvern.com/2019/05/08/richie-rich/

  6. @daniel– I didn’t do Richie Rich and honestly wasn’t even aware Hanna-Barbera did that cartoon, but as a proponent of ethics and irona in cartoon journalism, I don’t know if I would have been able to overlook her exclusion. Granted, the column was called “I Have Always Hated Scooby-Doo” and was about making surprisingly weird movies out of relatively cheap, repetitive cartoons, so everything was kind of graded on a curve anyway.

    Incidentally, the 2002 Scooby-Doo movie does the same “throw the annoying character under the bus” move with Scrappy that Vern notes Viva Rock Vegas does with The Great Gazoo. Like you, I always enjoyed Scrappy showing up, and I couldn’t make much time for Scooby-Doo (the show or the dog) in the first place. Scrappy was enough to make me excited about an episode. I know I’ve done it too, but it’s always weird when adults hold a grudge against the cute, silly thing meant to appeal to kids that was added to the cute, silly show meant to appeal to kids. Like somehow The Great Gazoo sullies the legacy of this show where Fred got hit on the head by a bowling ball and thought he was somebody else at least a dozen times. Now the Flintstones isn’t as good as Better Call Saul. “Oh no, the Ewoks ruined Star Wars,” would make sense to me if I’d first seen Return of the Jedi at 30, but I was six or seven years old and I thought they were cool and the first movie was already told from the perspective of a fussy, cowardly British robot who was programmed to stumble over his words.

  7. It’s very funny to me that Vern’s above-linked RI¢HIE RI¢H review also bemoans the film’s disastrous mistake of omitting Irona. I don’t have strong memories of the cartoon, but it’s clear the people have spoken, and today I stand in solidarity by making the difficult decision never to watch the film.

  8. Alex R – people forget that Scrappy Doo probably saved the Scooby Doo cartoons from getting cancelled in the 80s, they got a ratings bump and why that “classic” crew gave Fred and Velma (and later Daphne) the pink slip until the 90s and concentrated on Scrappy and his stoner uncles.

  9. @RRA — Can you imagine if your family was struggling financially so you took on a full-time job to help make ends meet, even though you were only a child and were also juggling school, and then everybody hated you for the work you did, and then years later your family made a movie and even though you had saved them, they made you into the villain? That’s Hanna-Barbera and Scrappy. Not even Scooby-Dum was so forcefully spit on. Not even the Funky Phantom was put into stocks in the town square.

  10. I admit that the Scrappy phase is one of my least favourite Scooby eras, but mostly because I’ve never been a fan of the gang meeting real monsters, which happened A LOT when Scrappy was around (although a bunch of them were friendly), and of course the removal of Fred, Daphne and Velma wasn’t exactly a good thing either. But I never hated Scrappy himself!

    But honestly, I’ve always been pretty tolerant when it came to supposedly cute and funny cartoon sidekicks. Okay, I also don’t think there ever was one that I liked as much as the network executives believed that kids over the world would. Not even Slimer! Maybe Orko? I don’t know. Does Jar Jar Binks count? I love him!

    My point is: I wasn’t around when Scrappy showed up originally. SCOOBY DOO arrived in Germany in the late 80s/early 90s and then we got almost everything at once, at times even on different networks. So it never felt to me like Scrappy was shoved down my throat, which is maybe why I never had any beef with him. And I still think that “Scrappy sucks” is just an internet meme that people started taking too seriously, like “Pineapple is the worst pizza topping” or “There has never been a worse band in music history than Nickelback”.

  11. Alex R – Allegedly that franchise is bringing him back somehow and I think you could do something with that character. I might only say that because Scrappy dissing has become so trite.

    CJ Holden – I don’t mind “real” monsters, tbh I say go with it if it makes a story better. You can have both Big Foot and real estate fraudsters dressing up as vampires.

    What pisses me off is when the “no monsters are real” edict the franchise has had for many years now, well RETURN TO ZOMBIE ISLAND comes to mind or the 13 GHOSTS “sequel” movie both wiped their asses and try to retroactively say nah bro, those stories were fake too.

  12. @Alex R
    Surely a Phantom would slip out of any stocks.

    @CJ Holden
    “I admit that the Scrappy phase is one of my least favourite Scooby eras […] and of course the removal of Fred, Daphne and Velma wasn’t exactly a good thing either.”

    The “Happy Birthday, Scooby-Doo” two-parter was I think the first SCOOBY related media that I ever saw, and those episodes reunited the OG gang.

    I also have a soft spot for THE 13 GHOSTS OF SCOOBY-DOO, which had Daphne (always one of my favorites in the gang, BE COOL, SCOOBY-DOO!, where she’s a straight up comedy character, is the most underrated series IMO), Vincent Price, and Flim Flam, a young East-Asian kid who’s possibly really un-PC, but again, I really liked those type of characters when I was young: Hadji in JONNY QUEST, Short Round in TEMPLE OF DOOM, Jake Ochmonek in ALF, who’s white, but so Italian, that he probably counts.

    While I never was a huge SCOOBY-DOO: THE MOVIE fan I think it’s fair to say that that movie is influential and culturally significant to the current state of big-budget blockbuster making. We wouldn’t have a drunk Supergirl, Metamorpho, Krypto the Dog, the Fortress of Solitude Robots without ’02 SCOOBY.

    People like to say that Gunn was born in Troma Entertainment, but he adopted the early noughties fad, that he himself helped foster, of doing an old franchise as a kind of ironic, self-referential and filled with deep cuts parody-comedy to all of his superhero movies. Other movies that had that approach at the time would be: THE BRADY BUNCH MOVIES, STARSKY & HUTCH (Todd Phillips, another comic book movie auteur, took his first stab at faithfully recreating a ’70s milieu with this one), Will Ferrell’s BEWITCHED, and Jessica Simpson’s DUKES OF HAZZARD.

    I say that, unfortunately, giving Scrappy-Doo a bad steroid cycle was probably necessary so that other silly, obscure characters could thrive.

  13. Despite Vincent Price I never was a fan of THE 13 GHOSTS (although it lead to Tom Ruegger doing A PUP NAMED SCOOBY DOO, which was one of the better “Let’s make kid versions of popular cartoon characters because of MUPPET BABIES” cartoons and established a few things that actually became canon afterwards.), but I absolutely loved the DTV finale that they made a few years ago. Although I disagree with RRA’s take on the ending. It was a pretty clever “If you prefer the ghosts being fake, here is proof for that, but if you prefer the ghosts being real, here is proof for that too” ending.

  14. The main reason I didn’t like Scooby-Doo (the show) as a kid was its repetition. Hanna-Barbera was able to make so much product because it was all cheap and based on whatever caught on, and Scooby-Doo caught on, so not only was Scooby-Doo repetitive, but it led to the repetition of the Funky Phantom (who, indeed, could not be held by mortal steel), Jabber Jaw, Speed Buggy, etc. Every Scooby-Doo episode had “my glasses! I can’t see without my glasses!” and “let’s split up, gang” and Benny Hill chases and the “you meddling kids” reveals and so on, and those all made it harder to stay engaged. We didn’t have cable and even then I could usually find something else to watch.

    BUT! I think if the Scooby gang dealt with both real and rubber monsters, it’d bring that repetition down quite a bit. There might be some mystery to the show. In some ways, that happened in the first live action movie– old man bad guy in the opening, demon-whispering Scrappy once they hit the island. I actually like this idea for pretty much any predictable monster series. I might enjoy a new Conjuring if the Warrens had to confront their own persecution complexes because they looked into a haunting and concluded that a Satanic ghost they had staked their careers on was just some kids trying to scare their parents.

    I liked A Pup Named Scooby-Doo as well, and I’m not sure what the difference was there. You know what Muppet Babies rip-off had a great theme song? Tom and Jerry Kids. This gets stuck in my head all the time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2KWULRloWQ

  15. Shout-out also to Scooby-Doo and the Reluctant Werewolf, which I enjoyed because it was about a race and all of the monsters had cars based on their lore. Was always down for a Wacky Races storyline invading other cartoons.

  16. THE RELUCTANT WEREWOLF is also my favourite of the Scrappy/Shaggy’s Red Shirt era. Just because of how unashamed ridiculous it is.

    I’m not saying you are wrong about how repetitive SCOOBY DOO was. And I heard from some Scrappy fans that they liked how he changed the dynamic of the show at least a bit. The repetition is of course part of its charme, but also obviously the punchline of at least 80% of jokes about it. But I guess to me it felt like it went against the concept of the show to agree that Shaggy & Scooby have every right to be afraid because monsters are totally real! In that regard I hate ZOMBIE ISLAND with a passion. It’s not just that the semi-Anime look of that era annoys the hell out of me, making a “dark” Scooby movie with an actual bodycount feels like fanfiction bullshit. Which is also why I hate MYSTERY INCORPORATED. The show basically starts with Velma telling the audience how lame all of the old adventures were and then manages to step into every single fanfiction trap possible. (Don’t get me started on the character assassination of nearly every gang member.) At least they had some inspired voice casting, like Udo Kier as the main villain or Jeffrey Combs as an H.P. Lovecraft parody.

    What I really liked about TOM & JERRY KIDS were the Droopy segments. The writers obviously had the most fun with them.

  17. The main reason I didn’t like Scooby-Doo (the show) as a kid was its repetition. Hanna-Barbera was able to make so much product because it was all cheap and based on whatever caught on, and Scooby-Doo caught on, so not only was Scooby-Doo repetitive, but it led to the repetition of the Funky Phantom (who, indeed, could not be held by mortal steel), Jabber Jaw, Speed Buggy, etc. Every Scooby-Doo episode had “my glasses! I can’t see without my glasses!” and “let’s split up, gang” and Benny Hill chases and the “you meddling kids” reveals and so on, and those all made it harder to stay engaged. We didn’t have cable and even then I could usually find something else to watch.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>