"I take orders from the Octoboss."

Ambulance (2022)

Over my [redacted] years of writing about movies, my relationship with the works of Michael Bay has evolved. It’s fair to say I once held hatred in my heart for them. I think I thought BAD BOYS was so-so when it first came to video (have not revisited – should I?) but THE ROCK, ARMAGEDDON and TRANSFORMERS 1 and 2 were some of the top offenders that sent me on a crusade against incomprehensible action back in the day. BAD BOYS 2 at least impressed me with its unprecedented levels of excess and aggression toward humanity, but I was young and full of hot air and worried that all movies were gonna start being hard to look at like that. Although that doesn’t stress me anymore, those movies still don’t appeal to me.

But since then I’ve watched each of Bay’s movies with more of a sense of humor about how unhinged they are, and thankfully his action has become less of a smear. The TRANSFORMERSes kinda blur together in my mind (as on screen), but checking my reviews I see it was the fourth one where he first showed he could do them with clean action. I gave it a rare 4.5 out of 5 ACR (Action Comprehensability Rating)! And I noted in my PAIN & GAIN review that having a mid-sized budget where he had to plan what shots he needed instead of shooting a giant pile of footage and chopping it into salad was a blessing. I would say the same of 13 HOURS. Finally, 6 UNDERGROUND is maybe his most entertaining mix of outlandish stupidity and incredible action spectacle. So I’ve been feeling positive about him.

Therefore, in all sincerity, I was excited for his new bank robber movie AMBULANCE, and I truly thought I was gonna dig it. I never suspected it would be a throwback to the shoot-everything-in-closeup, make-sure-the-camera-is-spinning-or-jiggling-at-all-times, establishing-shots-are-for-cowards Michael Bay of the old days. Although on a character and story level it’s in the top percentile of Bay’s movies, the machine gun edits between sweaty faces, disorienting low angles and dizzying (if sometimes cool) drone swoops forced me pretty early on to give up hope that I’d ever know where the people and vehicles were supposed to be in relationship to each other. It bothered me enough that there was honestly a minute I was thinking, “Should I just write this one off and go home?”

I don’t regret sticking with it, but I don’t blame myself for considering it either. I know how to enjoy a good story with bad action, but this is going for a FURY ROAD thing where 90% of the movie takes place during a chase. In a movie like that if the chase gives you nothing that’s gonna be an issue! Put it this way: why the hell does a movie with the good sense to use a defibrillator as a weapon have the bad sense not to show us clearly what happens to the recipient? We have to hear and sense what happens more than see it. Didn’t this used to be a visual artform?

Yahya Abdul-Mateen II (AQUAMAN, THE MATRIX RESURRECTIONS) stars as Will Sharp, an Afghanistan veteran (we know because he has a book on his table that says “AFGHANISTAN”) who can’t get his insurance to pay for the experimental surgery his wife (Moses Ingram, The Queen’s Gambit) needs to live. He pretends everything is fine and that he’s not going to visit his criminal brother Danny (Jake Gyllenhaal, PRINCE OF PERSIA: THE SANDS OF TIME) to try to borrow money.

Danny says he doesn’t have the money at the moment because it’s all tied up in a score and by the way we’re leaving to rob a bank in five minutes and we need your help. Turns out their dad was a legendary bank robber and Will has done his best to stay out of that life, but after repeatedly refusing he gives in and finds himself in the truck.

The crew of burly Baybarians includes Devan Chandler Long (Doom Patrol) and Brendan Miller (young Bison from STREET FIGHTER: THE LEGEND OF CHUN LI) as a pretty funny longhair stoner stereotype who wears Birkenstocks to the robbery. It’s not really clear what the plan is, but it goes south when dorky Officer Zach (Jackson White, THE SPACE BETWEEN) knocks on the door asking why they’re closed and if he can set up a savings account. Pretending to be the bank manager, Danny is unable to get rid of him, lets him in, and soon has to take him hostage.

Nobody has to call the cops, though. Members of the LAPD Special Investigation Section, led by Captain Monroe (Garret Dillahunt, THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT, BRAVEN, WIDOWS), were already there waiting for the gang to strike. So Danny and Will lose their escape vehicle and end up hijacking an ambulance, which is convenient since Will accidentally shot Officer Zach and wants to keep him alive. That becomes the job of abducted EMT Cam Thompson (Eiza Gonzalez, BABY DRIVER, ALITA: BATTLE ANGEL, HOBBS & SHAW, BLOODSHOT, CUTTHROAT CITY, GODZILLA VS. KONG) while Danny tries to evade police vehicles and arrange a deal with an old cartel associate called Papi (A Martinez, WALKING THE EDGE, CURSE OF CHUCKY) to help them create a distraction.

The script is credited to Chris Fedak (creator of the TV show Chuck), based on the 2005 Danish film AMUBLANCEN, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. The vehicle action in the original is much smaller and less destructive, but I found it way more tense, because you can see the whole vehicles, where they are in relationship to each other, and what’s ahead of them. Basic things like that. The remake is nearly an hour longer than the original, which is okay – Bay is obviously not going for the same simplicity. The original begins as they’re fleeing the bank (we don’t even see inside), doesn’t tell us about who’s chasing them, and doesn’t have any accomplices for them to meet up with. It’s just a character piece between the two brothers and the EMT. (There’s no cop hostage, just a dying guy who was already in the ambulance, who is not conscious.) And the money is for surgery for their mother, not a wife – in the original, the nice brother and the EMT fall for each other, and I’m glad that’s absent here.

Having seen the original I was able to understand the origins of an otherwise puzzling detail in Bay’s movie. Danny gets Papi’s men to steal a bunch of ambulances to drive around as decoys (see also: 2 FAST 2 FURIOUS), and at the same time has his employee Castro (Wale) meet them with a spray gun to paint theirs a different color. But isn’t the idea to blend in with the other vehicles? It doesn’t seem to serve a purpose for their plan or the narrative to make theirs stick out. I don’t get it, but I know it comes from the original’s scene where while the nicer brother is helping with a medical procedure the meaner brother tries to disguise the vehicle by slopping paint all over it. It’s a terrible decision there too but it’s treated as an act of stupid desperation. Here it seems like it’s supposed to be an ingenious plan.

The remake also has the EMT and nice brother performing an emergency procedure that she’s not trained for by communicating with surgeons, and one-ups it but doing it while they’re on the move. Bay actually just did a surgery-during-high-speed-chase scene in 6 UNDERGROUND, and that one was in the middle of a shootout, too! This version has the advantage of being kinda thematic, because this guy who can’t get help from the health care system is Zooming with top doctors to do DIY surgery, but that might be more meaningful if it was his out-of-luck wife and not a cop who could get real medical care if he’d bring him to a hospital.

I do appreciate the extremeness of Cam having to reach deep into Officer Zach’s guts and lift up his spleen (very graphically), and the extra kicker that he wakes up in the middle of this. And then she has to use her hairclip to close an artery! That’s great, though followed by the ludicrousness of her immediately declaring that it worked and then everything being fine. Nobody’s concerned they might, like, go over a bump and pop him open. He’s just fixed now.

“Guys, the camera rig’s not working. I’m gonna need you all to shake yourselves.”

Fortunately the cast is good enough to smooth some of this dumb stuff over. Gonzalez is the heart of the movie, and her introduction comforting a little girl impaled in a car accident is harrowing and emotional. Abdul-Mateen has had more complex roles including in Watchmen and CANDYMAN, but he does solid leading man work here and makes you root for a guy who robbed a bank and shot a hostage. Dillahunt is as fun as usual, even making some cornball forced quirk (he has a huge dog! but he puts him in a tiny car!) kind of cute. And unsurprisingly Gyllenhaal is the highlight, having a blast modulating between Eric Dane style smartass villainy and he’s-an-asshole-but-he’s-my-brother-so-I-love-him relationship drama. I think the story flips way too quickly between using the brotherly bond for a triumphant moment and Will realizing that his brother has gone beyond the point of no return, but it still kind of works.

As much as Bay’s disdain for action clarity always bothered me, his sense of humor is actually a bigger problem. It’s not as much the jokes being terrible as just the complete lack of tonal discipline (with 13 HOURS being a rare exception). If he’s trying to develop some dramatic tension it’s not gonna stop him from randomly injecting wacky stereotypes yelling, riffing and mugging. So I’m happy to report that there are only a couple really shameful ones in AMBULANCE. #1 is when they’re going up an elevator to rob the bank and – get this! – an angry, muttering Asian lady blocks the door with her cane and gets on with them! Can you believe it!? Come on, lady! #2 is the introduction of FBI Agent Anson Clark (Keir O’Donnell, AMERICAN SNIPER) in a comical sketch based on the premise “Wouldn’t it be funny if gay guys had marriage counseling?” They’re all bickering and everything! I mean, these same sex husbands they got now are as bad as wives, am I right?

Then for a bit he’s the typical uptight bureaucrat Bay hates, butting heads with other cops who question his cop cred – thankfully for being from Toledo instead of for the other thing. Letting it go after that does count as enlightenment on the Michael Bay scale, but the man is 57 years old and the year is 2022, I’m not gonna give him a trophy for that. Anyway, it was interesting to look up the actor and realize that he’s the guy who played a much more backwards gay stereotype in the at-the-time-hugely-popular 2005 comedy WEDDING CRASHERS.

The rest of the time it’s pretty well behaved and has a few laughs and even gets kinda meta with a couple explicit references to previous Michael Bay movies. Officer Zach’s partner Officer Mark (Cedric Sanders, THE SOCIAL NETWORK) mentions BAD BOYS and THE ROCK (both the movie and the actor who co-starred in PAIN & GAIN). It might be too charitable to consider it self-critique on Bay’s part, but Mark quoting one of THE ROCK’s douchiest lines – “Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and fuck the prom queen” – ruins everyone’s day and ends many lives. If that horseshit hadn’t convinced Zach to go into the bank to ask out a teller (Kayli Tran) then the crew would’ve left without hostages and maybe been apprehended without tearing up the city.

(Jesus christ – they really made 66-year-old Sean Connery spout that macho dickhead philosophy in American high school terms, and it was supposed to be cool! And people thought it was!)

One self-reference that might’ve improved the movie would be if Will and Danny’s nostalgic childhood flashbacks were about playing cops and robbers quoting BAD BOYS. I think that would be better than what they did do, which was to show them playing in full cowboy costumes. I guess their dad is not only robbing banks but making them watch Roy Rogers movies in the mid-‘90s.

I mentioned that Dillahunt’s character Captain Monroe is from the S.I.S., an infamous anti-robbery unit of the LAPD that I read about when I reviewed the quite good Mark L. Lester film EXTREME JUSTICE starring Lou Diamond Phillips and Scott Glenn. The unit’s trademark in real life is loading dozens of bullets into the backs of dudes who rob gas stations or McDonalds with BB guns, having the city pay off their multi-million dollar lawsuits and then declaring what they did justified and continuing to do the same shit again and again. In AMBULANCE, Monroe claims that “the new SIS” wait to apprehend people after a robbery because it’s safer than confronting them inside, but in reality they were controversial for doing just that – knowing that a robbery was going down and letting it happen because they loved to block their cars in and have huge, deadly gun battles.

Though Bay doesn’t make the cops as bastardly as EXTREME JUSTICE did, or as idiotic as DIE HARD did, it doesn’t fluff them up too much either. They’re not great at their jobs and you don’t feel real bad for most of them getting in the middle of this. They’re obstacles to Will getting through this alive and/or getting the money to his wife. And in the end you hate the motherfuckers for the very true-to-life choice to stand around while Will bleeds out instead of getting him medical help now that he’s in custody. Hats off to Bay for recognizing this time that bad boys are assholes.

My friends at the Action For Everyone podcast loved this one and give Bay lots of credit that I wouldn’t for alleged anti-capitalism themes in the script. I suspect his soul was not yearning to shout a message to the heavens, because I read that he turned this down years ago and then changed his mind because “Goddamnit, I just want to get out and shoot something fast. I’m tired of being locked up at home.”

But that doesn’t matter. If you see it in the movie it’s in the movie. I wanted to bring up their episode because I really loved something Vyce Victus pointed out (whether or not I buy that it’s a point Bay is trying to make): while Will falls into desperation because our health care system sucks, we see all around him the billions that have been spent on police, armor, guns, ammo, trucks, “helos,” surveillance equipment, etc. So there is some truth in AMBULANCE. It’s just you gotta squint real hard to see it because the camera’s jostling around and tilted at a weird angle so you can’t figure out what the fuck it is you’re supposed to be looking at.

This entry was posted on Monday, April 18th, 2022 at 7:29 am and is filed under Action, Crime, Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

22 Responses to “Ambulance (2022)”

  1. “I think the story flips way too quickly between using the brotherly bond for a triumphant moment and Will realizing that his brother has gone beyond the point of no return, but it still kind of works.”

    That bugged me too! I guess it’s what passes for complexity in a Michael Bay character study. (SPOILERS, but I can’t help but think that if Candyman just said “hey, I’m alive, you don’t have to commit suicide by cop”–it’d be like the bands showing up out of nowhere in Wayne’s World 2. “Let’s try the ~happy ending~!”)

    Big fan of the way every character got a sort of ‘How Badass Is He’ thing where they talked about how they were the best of the best of the best of the best at robbing banks/stopping robbing banks, then also they all acted like meatheads who contributed to a massively destructive clusterfuck. It’s like an Elmore Leonard story, only without the one actually smart character that’s self-aware enough to know what a bunch of yahoos they’re surrounded with.

  2. I didn’t have a problem following the action, but then, I think the only Bay movies I found hard to follow visually were Armageddon (which I found so infuriating that I haven’t watched it in 20 years) and Bad Boys II (same); and occasionally the Transformers, but more because the designs were overcomplicated than because of editing and camerawork. His movies aren’t always easy to follow, and aren’t always great with geography, exchanging that for sheer momentum and visual dazzle, which isn’t my preference, but he does that approach well.

    So I largely enjoyed the action here, including some truly wild drone work. I would have liked it to have been more restrained and classical visually like his last few films, but I still enjoyed that. Combined with being unusually solid on a character and story level, it’s my second favorite Bay film now, behind only THE ROCK.

  3. As a defender of The Rock (movie) and perhaps as a sequel to the 10-year-old comment Chris reminded me of, I want to say back in 1996 I did not take Connery’s line to mean he was cool. I saw it as a sendup of the sort of macho swagger in these movies. Plus Cage’s character is already a father to be. He’s got the girl. He just needs to be motivated to save the day.

    But what do I know. I always read the True Lies subplot to be very clearly that Arnold was the asshole for subjecting his wife to that. People say James Cameron is rooting for Arnold in those scenes because he was going through his third divorce (it’s also directly from the French movie). So maybe I’m watching these movies wrong.

  4. You have undoubtedly seen THE ROCK more recently (and more times) than me. I don’t remember the context, I was just reminded of it by these terrible cops in AMBULANCE, so I certainly could have gotten it wrong.

  5. I found this movie to be a more than decent way for me and one of my kids to kill a few hours in an unfamiliar city between stuff to do in the morning and a flight out in the evening. I pretty much always like me some Jake Gyllenhaal. And the crazy swooping drone shots literally cracked us both up – I guess you’d have to call them “establishing” shots though all they established was “check out my awesome drone y’all!”

  6. It could very well be that we’re supposed to think Connery is cool and I’m giving the film and viewers way too much credit.

  7. You’re definitely supposed to think the “prom queen” line is witty/clever and perhaps “cool”, but the wind is taken out of Connery’s sails by the “Carla was the prom queen” riposte from Cage. Kinda, sorta, maybe. Maybe it’s just supposed to be post-Tarantino “you don’t hear that in every film”-type dialogue. I’ve always assumed that part came from Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais’ rewrites, although neither they nor Conner were likely to have “prom queen” in their daily vocabulary. I’m not a THE ROCK acolyte (ROCKolytes I think is the preferred nomenclature) but that is one of the more memorable moments in the film, for better or worse.

  8. Wasn’t Tarantino a script doctor on THE ROCK? Or maybe it was John Milius? I think Milius did rewrites on THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER and Connery liked his dialogue so much that he wanted him to rewrite his lines on other movies, or something like that, I’m not sure.

    The Connery/Cage exchange might be dated and cringy, but it’s definitely memorable. I kinda think it is there to make Connery cool (he’s an elderly Bond character who is shown to out-cowboy all the Americans in that movie) and also be a pep talk for Cage. But I also think it embraces the macho swagger of it all, like Cage is supposed to be less of a out-of-his-comfort-zone schmuck because he has a prom queen wife.

  9. Tarantino did do some writing on THE ROCK, and may well have wrote that line but Milius was not involved as far as I can tell; it was Clement and La Frenais who Connery requested rewrite his dialogue, and he had worked with them previously, indeed they reuse the “fill this urine beaker/from here?” gag they wrote for him for NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN, which itself was recycled from an episode of their UK sitcom PORRIDGE.

  10. Although I just googled that last part to make sure, and I’m not sure that beaker gag does reappear in THE ROCK. They re-re-use it somewhere!

  11. As it happens, there’s a part in THE UNBEARABLE WEIGHT OF MASSIVE TALENT where Cage catches a bit of THE ROCK on TV and winces at the part where he says “Why don’t we cut the chit-chat, A-HOLE?!!?!”. Though there’s also a bit where he directly quotes Goodspeed upon seeing a prop from the film.

  12. PACMAN2.0 – I will absolutely accept being called a ROCKolyte

  13. I was going to say that Tarantino was hired to punch up the script on THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER, but oops! It was CRIMSON TIDE I was thinking of. Evidently, submarine movies just need rewrites in general.

  14. Netflix suffered probably their worst day losing over 37% of their value.

    I suspect this marks the start of the decline of the streaming industry. There are only so many customers out there and you can’t just keep on spending at this pace without radically increasing prices.

    Personally i am thankful to Netflix. I just subscribed to it last year and it has opened a whole new library of movies to me. Finally i was able to watch Studio Ghibli films and a whole lot of anime i missed before. So i sincerely hope Netflix continues to thrive in the years ahead.

    But what do you think of the current state of Streaming and it’s effect on movies?

  15. I wonder what it is though, compared to how much they gained over the pandemic which I think was quite a lot. It’s like covid, when we got from 100 cases to 2, then it goes up to 4 and everyone is like CASES HAVE DOUBLED!!!

    But it seems like Netflix has been canceling too many shows people like…they’re real quick on that trigger. Plus the increase of other channels which is giving me at least better shit…HBOMax is great AND gives us Batman AND another David Chase Baltimore show is coming to it.

  16. Netflix simply lost their prestige status. Remember when they started producing their own shit and a new Netflix Original Series was a fucking event? HOUSE OF CARDS, ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK and even fucking season 4 of ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT were highly anticipated watercooler talk material long before and after their release. Then they started to produce movies and stuff like BEAST OF NO NATIONS got even some award buzz. Even Adam Sandlers contract with them generated a certain amount of anticipation. But by now it’s really just quantity over quality. Every few weeks I hear about them cancelling a show and wonder why I’ve never heard of it. Or I read some clickbait headline like: “The 20 weirdest butts in Netflix’s beloved cult classic THE KISSY FACE PRINCE GOES TO HIGH SCHOOL 3” and I have never even heard of the fucking title. They basically became very expensive Network TV. Even their movie library went from “We got all kind of classic movies that you ever wanted to see” to “We got all the classic movies that you have seen a million times before and we guarantee that only a few of them were made before 1982!”

    That alone would be enough, but yeah, now everybody and their grandma has their own streaming service too, so that’s another thing. I know a whole bunch of people who only subscribe to a service for a month or two, watch what they wanna watch, then move on to the next streamer for a month or two and so on.

    By the way, I still think that Amazon is worse than Netflix when it comes to cancelling their shows. They advertise their new stuff for 1 weekend and when it then fails to generate any social media or award buzz, they pull the plug. I only know a handful of Amazon shows that made it past season 2. And most of them were early renewals as part of the marketing strategy.

  17. I’m not their biggest fan, but TBH the cancellations have more to do with the current economic situation and people tightening their belts than with any major creative missteps, although maybe that’s a particular UK perspective. Certainly the launch of high-profile competitors in the last few years won’t have helped. Although we shouldn’t forget that they still have over 200million subscribers.

  18. I think the common perception that Netflix movies are garbage is just wrong. There are indeed bad ones but the overall standard isn’t that much different from mainstream stuff.

  19. Oh, don’t get me wrong. Netflix is still producing some great (and lots of “just” good) stuff, but of course they also produce MORE and therefore the bad to great ratio became a bit uneven. When you try to cover every genre for every audience, from arthouse drama to teen RomCom and have to relase a bunch of them every month, they can’t be all bangers. And that’s normal.

  20. They’re releasing more A-Grade stuff, but there’s times when the production value quality feels just a little over straight to DVD quality, or just under what it should be. Like, THE OLD GUARD had an exciting premise of immortal warriors who’ve been fighting throughout history, but the execution felt really small scale with the weird lack of substantial period scenes. HIGHLANDER me up a bit, guys!

  21. Nice discussion on Netflix. Maybe it needs it’s own thread though?

    Let me be the one to get back to our friend Michael Bay. After I went to see this alone on a TOTALLY empty cinema, I’ve been thinking a lot about him and his craft. Heard 3 podcasts on his movies (bad boys, the rock, Armageddon) , re-saw The Rock (ROCKolyte for life) and also heard the commentary for it.
    So my take is this =
    Bad boys / the rock / Armageddon, the ONLY 3 movies you need to see of him, the ONLY 3 movies where he had something to prove and he truly also had to compromise his “craft” with a LOT of input from producers / had scripts written and rewriten / script – doctored by the BEST in the biz.

    After those 3 movies, he became “king of the word” and his excesses have become annoying to unbearable depending on the movie.

    Bad boys, his budget was so low he used his OWN porsche and paid out of his OWN pocket for an action scene (and got re-imburshed by the studio when the movie was an UNEXPECTED hit).

    The rock was his “make or break” picture, he had a ton of support from the best action producers at the time by far (simpson/Bruckheimer), a PHENOMENAL cast, top of their class writers working on it even just for specific scenes or characters.

    By the time of ambulance, the guy is unhinged. Every scene is 15 cameras, every gimmick is used TO DEATH (I was impressed by the shots with cameras flying “through” cars crashing the first 5 times and sick of it the remaining 200), his screenplays are ATROCIOUS at this point, the humor is crash and stupid, the real stunts are hacked to pieces on the editing room to the point of not impressing you at all.

    I’m with Vern on this one 100%. Went to the cinema for a “return to basics” for Michael Bay and got another nauseating tour de force of non-stop camera movement.

    Watch the rock again guys. Marvel at the “rainy slow motion” Ed Harris at the start. The MANY MANY locked camera scenes. The great tight shots of characters speaking great “action movie” dialog. Also observe that the movement on moving shots is PRECISE. It is pre-planned, not the amalgam of 20 cameras rolling.

  22. Oof, I just saw this one and yeah, Bay totally lost it. I never had trouble to follow his visual language, but this here was like if any of the BOURNE sequels had a baby with FREE FIRE. It was completely unwatchable! Just a bunch of 2-3 seconds long money shots incoherently slapped together. This is basically Michael Bay’s Tim Burton’s ALICE IN WONDERLAND: A movie that felt like he tried to please his haters by giving them everything they are accusing him of for years, but without anything that might convice them that they are wrong.

    That said: The whole brotherly drama worked surprisingly well for me, probably because I loved Gyllenhaal’s performance as technically-not-really-evil-guy, who still acted bad enough that you wondered if and when he might snap and turn into the main villain, while you still rooted for his redemption. And yes, even Bay’s inappropriate humor worked for me. When during the opening heist the hippy gets hit by the cash truck, looks at his mangeled legs and just asks while he dies: “What’s up with my legs?” and his friend yells: “That’s because you wear those fucking Birkenstocks!” I actually laughed way too loud.

    But all in all, I think Bay really doesn’t work for me anymore. I was already bored by his last two movies, but at least could enjoy the insanity behind them. This one was boring AND I couldn’t decipher what was going on!

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>