"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

The Cable Guy

June 14, 1996

THE CABLE GUY was, somehow, a divisive movie. It’s such a good idea: what if you slipped the guy hooking up your cable some extra money to give you the pay channels for free, and then he felt entitled to be your friend, and you couldn’t get rid of him? And what if he was an over-the-top goofball Jim Carrey but it played out like a SINGLE WHITE FEMALE or CAPE FEAR type suspense thriller? It’s very funny, but directed like a real thriller by Ben Stiller (following his debut REALITY BITES), so it turns out it wasn’t what most of society expected or desired from Carrey after his run of ACE VENTURA, THE MASK, DUMB AND DUMBER, BATMAN FOREVER and ACE VENTURA 2. We’ll get into that a little more later, but for now, fuck ‘em. They were wrong, obviously.

Steven Kovacs (Matthew Broderick, WARGAMES, THE LION KING) is newly separated from his girlfriend Robin (Leslie Mann, LAST MAN STANDING), having freaked her out by proposing. So he has a new apartment and needs the cable hooked up and it’s his buddy Rick (Jack Black, WATERWORLD) who suggests bribing the guy, which is not really Steven’s way, but he does it anyway. Great idea, Rick.

The cable guy says his name is Ernie “Chip” Douglas, acts like he’s caressing a nipple when he finds the “sweet spot” to drill into the wall, intuits that Steven is dealing with a breakup, likes to say “I’m just messin with ya” and “I’m just jerkin yer chain,” and pressures him into hanging out the next day. Then he brings him to sit on top of the city’s satellite dish, the place where he goes to think, to talk about the future of cable and internet.

Next thing you know Chip is showing up where Steven and friends play basketball, being overly aggressive and shattering the backboard. He sets up a giant TV and stereo system in Steven’s house without permission, invites people over for karaoke, and after Steven hooks up with a nice woman from the party (Misa Koprova, “Lyndon Receptionist,” JUNIOR), Chip says “Don’t worry, it’s my treat.” If you know what he means. Steven is wise enough to try to draw the line there, but it continues to escalate. There are disguises, attacks, a framing for a crime, a network of people he’s given free cable to who he uses to make Steven seem crazy. And like a true thriller it culminates with a stormy night time showdown on the satellite dish.

I watched this more than once in the ‘90s, but this time it had been a while and I thought maybe it was gonna be a problem for me that Carrey plays it so cartoonish. Arguably he’s toned down from Ace Ventura or The Riddler, but at all times he’s doing an extreme voice, face, posture, movements. He does a lisp, an underbite, a dance where every part of his body seems to move independently. There is nothing real about the performance. So I tried to picture what it would be like if it was played even straighter and cast with a normal thriller villain actor like, you know, James Remar let’s say, if he hadn’t been busy filming THE PHANTOM. Or Eric Roberts if he hadn’t been busy cameoing as Eric Roberts in this movie.

Eric Roberts bringing you to Medieval Times and talking old timey to annoyed waitress Janeane Garafalo would be pretty funny. But I was quickly won over to Carrey’s approach, because the beauty of it is that every single other actor does play the reality of it. Even Jack Black plays his role straight, as the friend who sees he’s losing Steven to this weirdo and gets protective. It’s Broderick’s responses to this bizarre individual entering his life that make it work. Especially the fact that he keeps trying to be nice about it, feels bad that he doesn’t want to be his friend, doesn’t want to be in some kind of dramatic conflict. He mercifully doesn’t keep blowing his top for comedic purposes – it takes quite a bit to break him.


Actually, I bet I would hate BATMAN FOREVER 5-10% less if Matthew Broderick was always there looking uncomfortable about Carrey’s obnoxious performance. Give me that as a special edition.

You know how comedies don’t necessarily prioritize craftsmanship? Not the case here. Cinematographer Robert Brinkmann (KANDYLAND, U2: RATTLE AND HUM) gives it an overcast, foreboding look, and they went and got John Ottman (THE USUAL SUSPECTS) to do the score. Admittedly he doesn’t do his normal thing, he goes a little Danny-Elfman-ish at times. But it’s never a comedy score. The most notable parts are when it weaves into songs Chip is singing or humming. I think that happens three times, always effective.

It’s not a problem but I think the alternative rock soundtrack feels a little inappropriate – it seems too cool for either of the main characters. I guess we do establish that Steven was going to go to a (Soundgarden?) concert with Rick but flaked out. Maybe he really is into Jerry Cantrell, Porno For Pyros, the Toadies, Cracker and Silverchair.

The song “Standing Outside a Broken Phone Booth with Money in My Hand” by Primitive Radio Gods was from an album that came out the week after the movie, and the song reached #1 on the alternative charts, so there is at least one commercial success that can be partly attributed to THE CABLE GUY. “Hey Man Nice Shot” by Filter is a diabolically appropriate song choice for the basketball scene because the title is a pun about Chip’s slam dunk but originally referred to R. Budd Dwyer committing suicide on live TV. The album does not feature White Zombie’s “More Human Than Human” (though this was the first of many movies to use it) but it does have a little bit of dialogue from the movie, Carrey’s performance of “Somebody to Love” from the karaoke scene, and an Ottman piece called “This Concludes Our Broadcast Day.”

Hey, you know who probly loved that CD? Elijah Wood’s character from FLIPPER.

Obviously we’d had our share of movies that thought they were blowing the lid off of the dark truth of modern media. NATURAL BORN KILLERS was before this, for example. But I like it here as gimmicky theming: of course if there’s a movie about an evil cable guy he has to be obsessed with old TV shows, use sitcom character names for aliases, hum the score to a famous Star Trek episode, etc. When Steven is flipping through channels we glimpse The Jerry Springer Show and Ricki Lake (infamous daytime talk shows of the era) so when we also see half a second of UFC it definitely means it was a symbol of how bad things were getting. (I don’t think Stiller knew the league would grow into respectability over decades but then turn fascist along with the American government. Weird!) We also see a bit of PLAY MISTY FOR ME to get us in the stalker mood.

A major concern of that type of satire at the time was “tabloid TV” and its coverage the O.J.Simpson trial. Obviously with the Menendez Brothers murder case in mind, THE CABLE GUY follows the fictional case of an ex-child star (Ben Stiller, HIGHWAY TO HELL) who murdered his twin (Ben Stiller, EMPIRE OF THE SUN) and tried to blame it on “Asian gangs.” We follow the trial through deadpan CourtTV segments with Rikki Klieman and MTV News flashes with Tabitha Soren.

In a certain sense this aspect is dated, since celebrity worship, true crime, reality TV, all of these things are way more insane now than they were then. In fact they took on human form as our current president. But what struck me as interesting about this movie for this moment is that we have all this talk about a “male loneliness epidemic,” allegedly a current phenomenon. But isn’t that exactly what this thirty year old movie is about? He has TV to blame instead of the internet, but “Chip” is an awkward dude with some unhealthy ideas based on his media intake, and who badly wants a friend. Don’t you want somebody to love? Don’t you need somebody to love?

A sad irony is that Chip makes a speech (twice!) where he says, “The future is now! Soon every American home will integrate their television, phone and computer. You’ll be able to visit the Louvre on one channel, or watch female mud wrestling on another. You can do your shopping at home, or play Mortal Kombat with a friend in Vietnam. There’s no end to the possibilities!” All of this is true. We had so much hope for it. But it wasn’t all it was made out to be.

 

THE CABLE GUY seems like a no-brainer: Carrey was hugely popular, this was a better and hipper movie than he’d been known for, it must’ve arrived as the pretty well-liked movie it’s remembered as, right? Actually, people took offense to it. Although THE PHANTOM was out of place for not even trying to be dark, you will remember that this was also a decade when grown adults could stand in front of you with a straight face and fret that something was “too dark.” The BATMAN RETURNS phenomenon. At the time, and for some time after, my conversations about it were usually me making an argument for why it was good.

There were a few positive reviews, but surprisingly it was not one of the movies that Roger Ebert seemed to appreciate more than others. He complains that he was just getting to a point where he could almost appreciate what Carrey was doing, and now all the sudden he changed what he was doing. “Maybe it would have worked better if the cable guy had become a real friend to Steven, devising love strategies and Machiavellian schemes to win back Robin and thwart her other suitors,” he writes in the final paragraph of his review. Counterpoint: Maybe not.

I suppose the jokes cause more discomfort than what was common at the time, but our cringe comedy technology has gotten so much more robust in the years since that it almost seems embarrassing that this was too much for the mainstream. What a bunch of wusses. On a commentary track recorded a decade-plus later, Carrey says, “They talk about it as if it was like a murderously dark thing, but I think it’s just funny, and the need of the character is hilarious.”

There was also a major armchair bean counter angle to the movie’s rejection. The big news story about it was that Carrey had been paid $20 million, a record and precedent setter for other stars. What were they thinking, paying him so much for a movie that is only aimed at a large audience and not the biggest possible audience? What if it doesn’t do well? Money will be lost! This is financially irresponsible. How could they do this to us with their bottomless well of money that they got from us!?

You might make fun of me for saying that, but in fact it didn’t make back that much more than double its budget, so it might not have even been profitable if not for the video sales and cable and everything. Utterly reckless. Somebody could have been hurt!

It would be funny though if this had been a big hit and they made it a series like THE STEPFATHER, where he shows up in other cities with other TV-based names and tries again.

The other big story I remember reading about in Entertainment Weekly or whatever was that it was first planned as a Chris Farley vehicle. That does sound kind of funny. And I remember producer Judd Apatow reportedly changing the tone in rewrites, though Lou Holtz, Jr. received sole credit from the WGA. Apatow actually wanted to direct, which was unacceptable to Sony, but they were okay with Stiller, who he’d worked with on The Ben Stiller Show.

On that same commentary track Stiller says, “I think alot of the issues with the movie are about the context of the movie, because it was being made as sort of this mainstream summer hopefully comedic blockbuster type movie and really we’re making this sort of strange, dark, pseudo-sexual tale of two men who become obsessed with each other.” That’s why it’s the perfect comedy for Slam Evil Summer, the season when the world was too preoccupied with exploding buildings to properly appreciate slightly off-kilter movies. But their day would come. The future is now.

* * *

Tie-ins: There was a novelization by Harriet Grey

Problematic datedness: Unfortunately there are hints of transphobia (opening with a Jerry Springer Show clip about someone’s girlfriend saying “I’m really a man” as an example of 1996 outrageousness) and homophobia (Steven being terrified when Chip visits him in prison and puts his nipple against the glass, causing another inmate to make eyes at him). Luckily these are mild for the time and I honestly believe everybody involved learned better.

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 18th, 2026 at 11:06 am and is filed under Reviews, Comedy/Laffs, Thriller. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

23 Responses to “The Cable Guy”

  1. I’ve loved this movie from seeing it theatrically to this very day. Ben Stiller’s comedic sensibilities were perfectly in sync with mine. I still find The Ben Stiller Show hilarious to this day. Plus it’s REALLY well directed. The end scene with the rain but lit apporproately is awesome stuff.

    I do want to argue one thing about homophobia aspect. Yes it’s supposed to be like haha gay sex but also if I’m in jail for something I didn’t do and a convinct wants to rape me, I’m going to be scared no matter what orientation I am.

  2. That Ebert quote sticks in my throat.

    I love artistic criticism for whatever insane reason, it’s why I’ve been here so long.

    However, I feel like dismissing a work as “I would’ve done it this way and it would be better” is NOT a critique of the actual piece as it exists. I don’t feel as if that is “critique” but rather an editorial view.

    I dunno…

  3. Proof this one is good, it has Matthew Broderick and he’s not a deterrent to the movie’s quality. Suppose you can say the same about Carrey here. You did good Stiller.

    I was always on this movie’s side, but even when younger I was into darker humor.

    Good this one has a larger following and I can see this one getting remake or a riff/ripoff and going over way better today. Hopefully not in a ‘that’s SO me’ way.

  4. Aktion Figure, this is one of the reasons why I don’t get Ebert’s popularity. As a European I didn’t grow up on him, so my opinion about him was formed during the last years of his life, but mostly after he died. And while some of his contrarian opinions are often pretty charming or even understandable, he pulled the “The movie in my head was much better” card so often that I can’t take him more seriously than random nerd XY who does the same on Letterboxd.

    Oh well.

    I actually saw this one on theatres with a buddy. He was quite disappointed and expected another ACE VENTURA or DUMB & DUMBER, but I loved it. My teenage brain didn’t even process that they were trying to subvert or parody anything. To me it just worked as dark humored thriller. Only when I got older I realized how brillant the movie actually is.

    The soundtrack album is a bit disappointing, but maybe it’s just my personal taste. I tend to like those pure Rock and Metal soundtracks less than the ones with other genres or complete stylistic randomness.

  5. I’ve always like Ben Stillers directing chops and I’ve always like this movie. It’s dark, but not that dark. I mean, Chip doesn’t kill anyone or anything? Not that I remember. And it’s hugely funny.

  6. No, he doesn’t kill anyone, but he does violently attack (established douchebag) Owen Wilson in a public restroom, frame Broderick for a crime he didn’t commit, get him fired from his job using spy cams and kidnap his ex-girlfriend, tying her up on a satellite dish like he’s a super villain in an old serial.

  7. Aktion, I think critics of the time didn’t like comedies with a cartoonish buffoon as a lead character. It didn’t matter if the comedy was funny (and thus fulfilling its mission as a comedy) – if it had an absurd or outrageous character then it was lowbrow and stupid and so they would give it a bad review. Antisocial or unsympathetic characters were only suitable for serious dramas like TAXI DRIVER, not crazy comedies.

    CJ, Roger Ebert seems to be a Rorschach test for a lot of people. Some thought he was too snobby, others thought he was too populist. I think of him as someone whose opinions of a movie tended to match what most people think of that movie today (with some exceptions), rather than a contrarian.

    I think Ebert wanted movies to be classier and more humane, hence his stance against graphic violence. However he would frequently defend the simple pleasures of a genre movie when arguing with his grumpier TV co-host Gene Siskel, who I always thought was the more contrarian of the two. Maybe Ebert seems snobbier to people who know him more from his print reviews, rather than his more folksy TV presence.

  8. I’ve always considered this by far Carrey’s greatest performance and film. I absolutely love this movie – eminently rewatchable. It’s just so berserk and devious. I remember seeing on the first Saturday of release (in a bit of wonderful happenstance Carrey is from the same hometown as me – in a theatre in Newmarket, Ontario) and the absolutely palatable sense of distaste and disappointment from nearly the entire audience was very memorable – I though it was the funniest, most hilarious thing I had ever seen and was dumbfounded at the general reaction from everyone. I mean what were they watching, this thing was a masterpiece (and Carrey has never even come close to equaling it in any other movie he’s made.) And I know the prison scene is a bit of an issue, but man – o – man, the gumption to throw in an almost casual parody of MIDNIGHT EXPRESS was just one example of the craziness on offer. Strangely enough this movie reminds me of my first viewing of Arnold’s LAST ACTION HERO – another movie that I laughed constantly through and was surprised when so many people also hated it, what we’re they watching?

    When Carrey was a teenager he did voice work for an obscure Toronto based TV show called THE ALL NIGHT SHOW, that ran for 4 – 5 hours over night on a local cable station. The show featured a night security guard who accessed the facilities after the channel ended it’s regular programming ( remember those day, anyone?) They would broadcast old tv show – it was the first time I saw an episode of THE PRISONER – and lots of pre-filmed comedy bits and get up to all the types of misdeeds that loonies could get into on late night fill the airwaves comedy programming back in the 1970s and early 80s. In one of the earliest shows I saw included a short film where it really looked like a dude blew himself up on camera! (It was fake, but at the time there was doubt, but the guys running the show ran it anyways.) A lot of THE CABLE GUY feels like a continuation or outgrowth of the idea of the show – that old tv shows constitute some kind of alternate but real world. I can’t help but think that Carrey was channelling a lot of it in THE CABLE GUY.

    There’s a documentary about the legendary THE ALL NIGHT SHOW on YouTube called 10,000 SHIFTLESS NIGHTS. At the 37 minute mark it includes the aforementioned explosion/shortfilm “Dave Chisolm – Blow Job.”

    Incidentally – Jim Carrey is only the 2nd funniest comedian from Newmarket Ontario Canada – John Candy was also born here. And unlike Carrey – who moved a way with his family when he was very young, Candy ended up living in town for a lot of his life. Some of my fondest memories as a teenager we’re talking comic books with Candy – he shopped in the local comic store and was often seen walking/shopping on the downtown/mainstreet.

  9. Curt, I do think that at his best Ebert was indeed “one of us”. Someone who could find beauty and entertainment value in the “worst movie ever” of the week while not being afraid of stating his negative opinion about the most beloved movie of the year. When I call some of his opinions “contrarian” I don’t mean that in an Armond White way. But honestly, from what I could see he was so off in his tastes and opinions many times, together with his “Here is the version of the movie that I imagined in my head”-shtick it makes it hard for me to look up to him.

    Maybe I really lack the experience of seeing him on TV every week in a time when you had to be paid to be allowed to state your opinion about a movie in public, to actually understand his status as THE critic.

  10. A couple of years ago, I was listening to a lot of B.B. King. While listening to one of his live albums, I heard the snippet that Primitive Radio Gods sampled, and that song came flooding back into my memory. It was such a weird experience because I hadn’t thought of it for many years.

    I know that a lot of these television satires like Natural Born Killers and To Die For can come off as conservative and fuddy duddy, but considering that our president mastered the medium of television on his way to the highest office in the land, maybe they look better in hindsight. A common rebuttal that people have when you criticize the way the internet harms people’s attention span is that people said the same thing about television. But maybe television sucked too.

  11. CJ, I would say of Roger Ebert that “his status as THE critic” is mainly due to his various TV shows with Gene Siskel (and later Richard Roeper). His lively discussion of a movie’s merits on weekly TV did a lot to popularize film criticism (and film itself) as a popular artform.

    Also, his TV presence was informal and conversational – plus there was a second person there to challenge his opinion – whereas his writing style might come across as more formal and aloof if you’re not hearing that casual TV voice in your head while reading.

    My impression is that Ebert, more often than Siskel, liked the movies that ended up still being liked today. Maybe Ebert disliking a widely liked (or deeply loved) movie was more common than I thought, or maybe my tastes were just closer to his. There were times that I strongly disagreed with him, but not often enough to sour me on him.

    It doesn’t really matter though, since Ebert was just one critic, at a time when fewer critics had the public’s ear. It’s unfortunate that an articulate critic doesn’t have such influence anymore, but it’s also arguably better to not just have one or two voices telling everybody else what to like.

  12. Ebert was sort of weird with his reviews sometimes.

    He absolutely hated Die Hard upon release and Siskel loved it.

  13. Well, I suppose someone has to be that guy so here goes:

    I hate this movie. I hated it when it came out and, when everyone was sort of re-assessing it, I watched it again and still hated it.

    For me it comes down to a couple things: first of all, the Jim Carey of it all. This was the movie which made me realize that I don’t actually find any of his shtick funny. He is, in my opinion, the worst example of the “loud = funny” approach to comedy. I hate it. And secondly, I don’t think Ben Stiller is funny either. I remember watching his show in the 90s and thinking that it just came across as a nepobaby (though I probably didn’t know the term at the time) vamping with his privileged buddies and being more annoying than funny and I’ve felt that way about his stuff ever since. I generally think he’s the worst part of anything he’s in, including that stupid instacart ad he’s in these days. I don’t know. I guess I’m not adding much to this conversation other than to say that there are those of us who generally have good taste but still think Cable Guy sucks and has somehow become overrated and considered a misunderstood cult classic while still sucking.

  14. I tend to hate Carrey’s schtick, which I consider the prime example of what I call “cry for help” comedy. Some comedians seem so desperate for a laugh, so junk-sick for approval, that they have to constantly shuck and jive for your attention. I do not like this type of comedian. They make me uncomfortable. I am not your therapist. Please do not rely on me to validate your existence. That is not my job. I prefer the Bill Murray style of comedy, which seems to only wish to amuse itself. If you don’t laugh at Bill Murray, Bill Murray is pretty sure that’s your problem. He lets the laugh come to him. I respect that. And I can’t laugh at a comedian I don’t respect.

    That said, I think Carrey realized this about himself, which led to him pulling away from comedy and then fame altogether so he could wander the wasteland and paint and study philosophy and learn to stickfight in Thailand or whatever. He knew he had to learn how to make himself laugh before he could do it to anyone else. I think that was a healthy choice. Also I can stomach him a lot easier in more dramatic roles.

    THAT said, this is one of the very few Jim Carrey comedies I like. The other is DUMB & DUMBER. That’s the entire list. The difference with those two is that Carrey is used as an instrument in someone else’s comedic symphony. When he’s allowed to conduct the orchestra himself, as he did in the execrable ACE VENTURA movies, the results are mortifying for all involved.

    I feel the opposite about Ben Stiller, who I can’t stand in movies he’s not in charge of. When he’s just the world’s most easily embarrassed nebbish, like in the MEET THE PARENTS series, I can’t even bear to look at him, but when his sensibility is the driving force, he puts out some strong stuff. But even then I’m mainly talking about this and TROPIC THUNDER, his masterpiece.

  15. I guess over-the-top comedy acting is subjective. I love Jim Carrey, ESPECIALLY as the Riddler (one of his most criticized performances in this dojo), whereas I finally watched the cult classic MACGRUBER recently and found much of it more forced than funny.

    The “loud = funny” approach (as Dtroyt put it above) seems to be the path of Saturday Night Live and its comedians-turned-stars. When their movie vehicles manage to be funny to me it’s despite the acting style, not because of it.

    But I can’t get enough of comedy actors who seem to be on their own crazed wavelength, and I personally put Jim Carrey in that group, along with Eddie Deezen, Bobcat Goldthwait, and Stephen Stucker (whose Johnny in AIRPLANE! is basically a Deadpool prototype). Someone like Bill Murray (or Chris Elliott, or Chevy Chase) is a more deadpan version of the latter, but whether they’re trying to amuse you or just themselves might also be subjective.

    Maybe it comes down to: does this person seem to be straining to get a laugh, or do they seem naturally that crazy? Since we don’t know the actor personally, it’s just a personal gut reaction.

    I found Robin Williams funny, but he was maybe the ultimate “junk-sick for approval” comedian, so much so that there was a backlash against him until his tragic death reclassified him as a saint.

    The one non-auteur Ben Stiller role I’ll defend is Mr. Furious in MYSTERY MEN, which I thought he was great in.

  16. Yeah, I probably should have mentioned that I recognize that comedy is probably the most subjective of film genres and that I may be in the minority when it comes to Mr. Carrey’s style (sorry about misspelling your name earlier, Jim). I mean he was definitely the biggest comedy star of the time when this came out, so obviously a lot of people liked his stuff. And there is plenty of broad, loud, dumb comedy which I do like. But this one has never worked for me and probably never will. Oh well.

  17. It’s always funny to me that Stiller started out in serious roles in the 80s and early 90s.

  18. I’m also not much of a Jim Carrey ‘fan.’ I never really found much of his other films (whether comedies or dramas – that appealing, funny or interesting. I’m old enough to have watched a fair amount of IN LIVING COLOR – and laughed at some of his stuff then – Fire Marshall Bill was pretty darkly hilarious – but it all seemed funnier when he was working in 5 minute bits. In some ways it’s why I’m surprised at my love for THE CABLE GUY – it’s definitely the only film of his I ever feel the need to actively revisit or watch when it crops up on TV. But I guess I’m also not much of a comedy guy – I haven’t watched any tv sitcoms since around 1990 ( I only saw episodes of FRIENDS for the first time in 2020, never seen a minute of SEINFELD etc.) I watched plenty of sitcom stuff before that – MASH, WKRP, THE KIDS IN THE HALL era stuff, but I guess like my active interest in music (which kind of stopped in the mid 1990s, comedy just never moved on with me. I mean, I’ll watch some stand-up and a more recent funny film, but for my money the funniest filmmakers of the last 40 years are the Coen Brothers – I never laugh harder than at the stuff in FARGO or RAISING ARIZONA or A SERIOUS MAN, or more darkly NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN or INSIDE LLEWYN DAVIS. And shamefully I also really enjoy a comedian who normally swings even lower than Carrey’s saddest work – Mike Myers (also a Toronto suburbs raised kid) I mean I love the AUSTIN POWERS trilogy (including part three) – so shit what do I know about good taste and quality? Although Myers hasn’t been funny for like 20 years and I’m shuddering at the thought of the threatened 4th film. I guess NETFLIX is gonna write a cheque for $$$$$$. The CORNETTO TRILOGY was pretty good – and unlike a lot of other comedies – slickly and smartly directed.

    And so much of comedy and comedians is basically them yelling and screaming at people. It seemed like anytime I saw a clip of a Will Ferrell movie that’s what he’s doing.

    I will also mention that I did absolutely love TROPIC THUNDER. That movie came completely out of left field. The thing I think is funny about the long tail of that film is that there seems to have been a number of stories recently about people claiming that they could never make that film today – the RDJr stuff, the violence, the Simple Jack stuff – when the fact is that the thing no film or filmmaker could ever do today when making a film is absolutely crap all over the military or soldiers the way the film does – you could never get away with that in a (especially Hollywood) film today. It’s like realizing that a movie like PLATOON or FULL METAL JACKET or MISSING or SALVADOR could never be made because they don’t jingoistically, mindlessly salute and glorify soldiers and war – that is something that would never fly in the present.

  19. One last thing that I see in THE CABLE GUY is a parallel with UNDER SIEGE – it seemed like both directors were smart enough to strictly limit the screen time of the ‘star.’ Carrey might not be offscreen for nearly as much of he who will not be mentioned in UNDER SIEGE – but THE CABLE GUY is very much a two-hander with Broderick getting a lot of time without Carrey. Don’t over use your big gun.

  20. This is legitimately the first time I’ve seen a person express a positive emotion about Eddie Deezen.

  21. I think he’s funny in WARGAMES!

  22. Love this film. Me and my (now sadly departed) friend, loved quoting this film especially the Medieval Times section. We would make each other laugh by sticking bacon to our faces to do the “Silence… of the lambs” bit and then try to chat up girls whilst on the London Underground (notes: it doesn’t work). I miss that dude.

  23. The climax I thought was like ricochet

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>