"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Evil Dead Burn

You know me – I Iove Sam Raimi, I love THE EVIL DEAD. Nobody will ever make an EVIL DEAD the same as Raimi did, but as far as horror franchising goes I think he’s got a good set up here. We have his original classic trilogy (1981-1993), which he was able to legacy-sequelize surprisingly well with a decades later tv series (2015-2018). That’s gonna be it for Bruce Campbell’s character Ash, and I think that’s fine. More than enough. Instead Raimi has turned to recruiting younger up-and-coming filmmakers to put their spin on movies in the same universe. They have some sort of Book of the Dead that summons some sort of Deadites, but they aren’t necessarily serialized, they’re mostly different incidents that stand on their own.

It didn’t seem like a popular opinion at the time, but I loved Fede Álvarez’s vicious remake EVIL DEAD (2013), and that has only solidified over the years. Lee Cronin’s EVIL DEAD RISE (2023) didn’t hit me as hard, but it’s a fun time and it’s nice to see somebody capture some of the EVIL DEAD spirit (or even try to define what that is, exactly) while telling a different story in a different setting (an apartment building).

That one having done well, producers Raimi, Campbell and Rob Tapert got the ball rolling for some more, and I’m very impressed by their choice of the French director Sébastien Vaniček. Like them I loved his debut INFESTED (2023), which is about a black market shoe salesman and rare animal enthusiast who causes his housing project to be overrun by deadly fast-growing spiders. It’s both smarter and more serious than that probly sounds, and it’s on Shudder.

Vaniček has reteamed with his INFESTED co-writer Florent Bernard for this one, and according to Fangoria they were given complete freedom. There are a few connections to the last installment, and mentions of things that could be setting up some future storyline, but for the most part this feels like its own standalone story. And thankfully RISES burned all the obvious callbacks, so Vaniček can just get down to business.

Which he does. That’s the first thing I loved about it. It opens with the playing of a reel-to-reel incantation, and the act of summoning Kandarian demons. No need to set the stage yet – just turn on the amps. A couple of schmoes have their fishing trip ruined by hooking an evil severed head and encountering aquatic mayhem. The scene doesn’t feel jokey, but I laughed at the shot of a lobster scurrying away. I think he got out of their trap and said, “This seems to be something between you guys, I’m staying out of it.”

Once we’ve been spookablasted in the face I guess it’s okay to meet the main characters, but keep in mind we haven’t even hit the title yet when Joseph (Hunter Doohan, Wednesday) and his girlfriend Thya (Luciane Buchanan, The Night Agent) are celebrating his birthday at a club run by his older brother Will (George Pullar) and Will’s French wife Alice (Souheila Yacoub, CLIMAX). Will keeps making everyone uncomfortable by criticizing Alice and later, in the parking lot, he’s grabbing her arm and throwing a drunken tantrum before they fail to stop him from getting in his car and roaring off. That’s when he intersects with the opening Deadite and suffers what the family believe is a fatal drunk driving accident but that we know is much crazier. I love scenes where a character yells “WHAT THE FUUCKK!!??” and it feels completely earned.

Honestly a scene or two ago I thought oh great, we gotta spend time with this asshole? And then he immediately got his. So once again, this movie rips. It knows what it’s doing.

This installment’s equivalent of a cabin in the woods is the Price family vacation home where Joseph has been staying while writing his book. Much bigger and nicer than a cabin, a little decrepit, definitely isolated. Like the EVIL DEAD cabin it has a basement to lock a Deadite in, but the weird occult stuff is in the attic. See, their late Grandpa was kind of a Professor Knowby type, he spent years traveling the world finding ancient Book of the Dead shit, including a Kandarian dagger they’re trying to find and destroy. That’s what Joseph’s book is about, so he’s been going through the stuff.

The rest of the family joins him in the house after the funeral: his mom Susan (Tandi Wright, LOVE AND MONSTERS, PEARL, Power Rangers S.P.D.), who tries to throw that occult stuff away; his dad Edgar (Erroll Shand, SAFE HOUSE), who might be possessed after an incident in the crematory; his grandma Polly (Maude Davey), who never remembers who anybody is or what’s going on but often accuses Thya of trying to steal from her.

And then we have Alice, who’s having a terrible time pretending to mourn a not-great husband, much less staying with the parents who never approved of her in the first place and now seem to blame her for his death. I like that it gives us scenes we haven’t seen in this series previously: a super uncomfortable funeral, an even more uncomfortable family dinner. There’s a grounded tension because the parents are pushy and judgmental about Alice not wanting to keep Will’s restaurant, among other things, and about her keeping it to herself what a terrible marriage it was, but also there’s the horror movie tension of supernatural shit going on with Edgar, plus Alice saw Edgar almost stab himself and now she keeps noticing him grabbing the steak knife and the corkscrew and he’s getting sweatier and angrier and the dog keeps whining and it’s a very long, torturously slow (evil dead) burn until the turning point when no one can pretend everything is fine.

The stress level of that scene had me thinking of UNCUT GEMS, of all things. Of course, this will also bring to mind many horror movies. You know those French and their extremity, but I was thinking more Italian, espcially DEMONS and DEMONS 2. Maybe it’s the choir and the organ and the occasional guitar blasts in the score by Double Danger. There is, of course, lots of fire. That’s kinda Italian. There are imaginatively gruesome injuries. The best improvised weapon is given away in the trailer (it’s car related), but that’s one of many. There is some very upsetting ear trauma, I will say.

Crucially, Vaniček invokes Raimi visual energy without seeming like an imitator. There are numerous elaborately staged set pieces with perfect camera moves. But even the calmer, mood-setting scenes are exciting for the ways cinematographer Philip Lozano (BLOOD MACHINES, COBWEB, MadS) makes everything seem just off enough to be a little queasy, putting the camera a little too close or skewing the angle slightly, and the color is washed out, almost sickly. A good Raimi/Vaniček intersection is the drone shot that goes up over the trees and then wobbles out of control.

I also like how in the early section of the movie ordinary things like cooking dinner follow the style and rhythm of the infuential suiting up montage in EVIL DEAD II. (Editor: Maxime Caro.)

Maybe the most EVIL DEAD thing about BURN is that If you want to talk about “the cool part” there’s a long list of parts that could be. A Deadite toast with the hot wax from a (personally meaningful) candle might be the iconic scene. But that follows the fight inside the car and the aftermath. And there’s the part with the Deadites scurrying across the roof and chasing her down the chimney. The part where they bash into the TV while it’s showing old wedding videos of Will. The mirror shot. The dog. The long take where Alice crawls through the house as all kinda of shit happens around her – it reminds me of in dreams when I struggle to move.

It’s a thrill ride, and it does have humor, including straight up jokes, right from the start. But the overall tone is not fuckin around, and I like that. As with EVIL DEAD 2013, there are some complaining that it should be jokier. I think EVIL DEAD II will always be my favorite, and it’s obviously very funny, but I personally don’t think it’s a movie that can be topped or repeated. I think Raimi and company are absolutely correct that the well to return to is not “groovy,” but “The Ultimate Experience in Grueling Terror.”

Also, I personally find it funny seeing these movies with crowds that seem to have expected a light horror comedy and then the not-fuckin-around horror hits them like the guy in the old Maxell ads. Somebody behind me kept muttering sutff like “jesus CHRIST!,” sounding more mad than appreciative. I’m sorry, but in a horror movie that adds to the experience. It just does.

As much as I cherish the original trilogy, and know that Ash’s idiotic sexism is part of the joke, I do think those are very boys-club movies where, since Ash is the only character who really pops, the women are lightly sketched, to put it charitably. And I like that the new EVIL DEAD movies and show very much go in the opposite direction. In this review I kinda pretended Will was the main character because (mild spoiler) I feel you could potentially go into it expecting him to follow the original arc of Ash, or even the standard portrayal of a supposed wimp. He’s a sympathetic character whose older brother has belittled him as a slacker, his dad as a guy who doesn’t know how to do a man’s job, specifically for not doing work involving power tools. Obviously he’s gonna come through and save the day! Well… he tries, anyway. I like that without being a total loser he still doesn’t cut it to be that guy.

An even more subtle subversion is the way his pen sort of fulfills the role of Linda’s necklace. In an EVIL DEAD, or any movie, there tends to be an object with personal significance to a character, like the necklace Ash gave to Linda and then held onto after her death. In BURN it’s a fancy pen that Will gave Joseph as a birthday present. What’s interesting about it, though, is that even Will’s gifting was an act of aggression. He makes Joseph uncomfortable with the exorbitant price tag and uses it as a swipe by implying he’s some of slacker for working on a book forever. So when the pen is carried (and of course weaponized) it’s not a reminder of his beloved dead brother, exactly.

Could this be the first elevated spookablast? Nah, but an EVIL DEAD movie that’s serious about its themes of domestic abuse and family trauma is not something I ever thought would happen or work this well. We see different responses to Will’s abuse: they don’t know about that side of him, or don’t know the full extent of it or what to do about it, or they completely deny it. We see him blame it on Alice, tell her “none of my exes made me like this.” We see his dad having anger issues and, at least in his possessed form, showing signs of an abuser. Off the top of my head I can’t think of another horror movie that quite captures this idea of self harm as a threat – possessed Edgar threatening to stab or shoot himself as a way to horrify others. He shoots himself in the head (more than once) and then walks around with the holes. The guy had real murder-suicide potential.

He’s visibly a monster, but that’s nothing new for Susan. She still calls him sweetie. Still kisses him. As much as she sucks and as much as she’s a danger, Alice recognizes she’s a victim and takes enough pity on her to try to spare her. Susan is generally a cold and mean character, but the scene where she tries to throw away the important occult items shows her humanity. We can see her point-of-view that her dad was a nut who disappeared into mystical bullshit rather than take responsibility for his family, forcing her to spend her life as caretaker for her sister and then mom. That’s real world shit that sucks.

And the climax of the movie is interesting because (WHY THE CLIMAX IS INTERESTING SPOILER) of course Will has to come back as the final boss, but he’s this strange digital or digitally enhanced FX creation, not a whole person, much of him burned off (like I kinda imagine a new Freddy would have to be to be different from Robert Englund). He’s not physically threatening, he seems like you could break him, but he’s psychologically threatening. She has to face him. And she has to not give in to him. What she does is another thing that seems taken from dreams, and I think many people will find it very cathartic.

During the credits there’s an almost MCU type “for the fans” stinger, a little Necro-comic-conning, if you will. That seemed to delight my crowd, and I heard some people talking like it was as an apology for practically giving them a white streak in their hair like Ash. Yeah, EVIL DEAD BURN is another chapter in a growing franchise (Francis Galluppi’s EVIL DEAD WRATH has already been shot, even though it’s set for a 2028 release), but I have a feeling it will have a long trail of appreciation for its particular qualities. Or at least I’m gonna think of it as some kind of minor classic.

This entry was posted on Monday, July 13th, 2026 at 9:01 am and is filed under Reviews, Horror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

33 Responses to “Evil Dead Burn”

  1. As someone who’s had ear infections since a kid, from pretty much every time I went into water, the sound design for that pen scene had my skin crawling. They 100% captured that internal head sound of water in the ear drum and when you try to “pop” it with a finger. It’s hard to describe but I loved it and will use it as a reference the next time I try to describe what that pain is like to someone.

    I really liked this too. It’s funny, I know some people see a big difference between the old trilogy and these new ones, but they both still seem over the top and funny to me in their gratuity. The scene they used in the trailer, with Alice crawling around while the little brother gets bounced all around the house really feels like something Sam Raimi would have subjected Bruce Campbell to 40 years ago. I think that’s what throwing some people, these new movies don’t have an actor like Bruce Campbell, whose reactions are what really sells the 3 stooges vibes of II and Army. But the violence is still comedically over the top to me. I still feel like these guys/gals are giggling to themselves as they make this.

    Is this the worst EVIL DEAD? Maybe, one of them has to be. But its still a fun time at the movies.

  2. Great film. For a good laugh, go read it’s entry on DoesTheDogDie.com, a catalogue of the film’s many many many many transgressions

  3. (That’s a handy site for specific triggers, and damn is it unlikely that another 2026 film will have so many)

  4. That there’s a warning on that site for “Does someone leave without saying goodbye” is kind of amazing to me. (No offense to people with abandonment issues.)

  5. Me and my buddy who I went to see this with had our biggest laugh at the end when the paramedics didn’t immediately drive the final person to the hospital with their multiple stab wounds and head trauma. We imagined the line “will you make it home alright on your own?” to be left off-screen or between cuts or whatever. Two thumbs up.

  6. It’s kinda wild that sony just dumped this as Moana counter-programing with little to no marketing. I didn’t know it even came out until I started seeing reviews.

    But the reviews have been… interesting. Basically, bad ones consist of “unpleasant, bleak, and cruel. Although it has some great set-pieces”. While the good ones consist of “unpleasant, bleak, and cruel. AND it has some great set-pieces”. Which indicates to me the movie completely achieves what it sets out to do, it’s just that you may hate what it does. Which I totally respect.

  7. I had a great time with this film. I’m not too keen on the 2013 Evil Dead yet Rise and now Burn are films that I have had a great time with. While they will never match the Raimi films (and I love the TV show), these are very good horror films/gorefests with some good character beats. Evil Dead might be one of the strongest, most consistent horror franchises around.

  8. I’m pretty sure most of you know how I feel about this endless IP regurgitation cycle we got going here (SPOILER: I’m against it). These new EVIL DEADs are fine, and if anybody likes them I can understand why, but I’m just so tired of all the same old shit getting trotted out again and again and again that I can’t get any joy out of this stuff anymore. Like salty foods, this franchise slop is bad for my blood pressure, and I’m trying to cut both of them out of my diet.

    So somebody out there must be trying to give me a heart attack, because the Monday after this new EVIL DEAD they debut the trailer for the fucking A24 FRIDAY THE 13TH prequel series (just putting those words together made my triglyceride count go up) AND a new NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET reboot. I’m really glad the Zoomers seem to finally be rejecting all this reheated swill in favor of their own (inscrutable, unwatchable) movies. You couldn’t pay me to sit through BACKROOMS but if it helps derail the franchise juggernaut at last then I’m all for it.

  9. hey, this was great! the few reviews i read beforehand all seemed to agree this is the worst film in this series, lacks the fun of prior entries, is done in by its drab grey palette, etc. i can’t agree with any of those points; much more understandable to me are any reservations one may have about a subject like domestic abuse taking center stage in a movie like this that affords little gravity to anything outside of cackling demon violence, but with that said i appreciated that the cast’s interpersonal dynamics remain a focus throughout its runtime (when they’re not busy severing each other’s limbs). i haven’t seen the prior two films since they were released but i recall in the 2013 film the protagonist’s drug use mostly served a mechanical function, keeping the other characters in the dark about the supernatural elements for a bit longer, and lee cronin’s entry, like his mummy movie earlier this year, seemed more inspired by The Exorcist in how it frames demonic possession (psychosis, aberrant behaviors, whatever) intruding on an otherwise relatively stable family unit. in this film the protagonist’s outsider status is always at the forefront.

    i wasn’t expecting the title to be so literal; the constant flames pop against the greys and yeah, this certainly would have had to have been shot by the same guy as MadS, right? just way more work put into this visually than i expect out of a sixth entry in any horror movie franchise. adding to my wariness going in was the fact that i was unfamiliar with every name in the cast; i figured they cheaped out by hiring unknowns but no, of course everyone in this film has big recent streaming credits in their resumes, i’m just old and no longer consume every single bit of mass media that gets released (and it turns out i actually have seen lead souheila yacoub before in gaspar noe’s Climax and noemie merlant’s The Balconettes, so there you go). this is new to me, it feels refreshing to be disconnected enough from the pop culture apparatus at large that i can go into a film like this without much foreknowledge about what i’m going to get. between that and the release of films like Backrooms and Obsession (both of which i quite enjoyed for very different reasons), this year feels like a sea change for me in how i view this genre. the zeitgeist has moved on, the new buzzy horror filmmakers are from a categorically different generation than me, and i’m excited to see what comes next. it’s rejuvenating, and i suspect films like this one are never not going to be something i need in my life to help me feel better, a cathartic valve. this has also made me think it might be time to revisit all of the early- to mid-2000s french horror films i gave short shrift to at the time due to their inherent mean streaks, as that stuff would probably play much better for me nowadays.

  10. Couldn’t really get into this one at all on a substantiative level. It wasn’t some wretched piece of shit that’s worthy of disdain, but at every turn, I shrugged at the things it was going for, and came to think that, “Oh. This is how the Evil Dead movies are gonna be from now on, I guess.” And as far as big fucking horror movies of the year, its examples of “self harm as threat” did not make me think twice, in comparison to how it used such a grotesque and unpleasant device in comparison to that ONE big horror movie this year that relentlessly utilizes that device as cruel control.

  11. What’s Mr. Majestyk got against BACKROOMS? (Which I thought was quite good.)

  12. Gepard, I think Majestyk was saying that he would never want to watch BACKROOMS in the first place (due to his established dislike of A24-style horror), not that he saw it and disliked it.

    I enjoyed BACKROOMS a lot. It reminded me of THE CELL, ANNIHILATION, PONTYPOOL, and an old Jim Henson TV movie called THE CUBE. Vern has pointed out that the A24 horror aesthetic is heavily influenced by Kubrick’s THE SHINING, and I think BACKROOMS combines that with the alien hotel room at the end of 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY.

    Horror is subjective, but BACKROOMS is a type of surrealism I really like.

  13. Curt nailed it. I am happy for The Youth that they finally got some movies of their own. It’s only natural that I, An Old, should find the movies they like baffling and annoying. I’m sure my grandfather would have found little to cherish in PULP FICTION or HARD BOILED. This is good and healthy. I’ve become pretty adept at spotting the ones that are Not For Me. There are many indicators. If it’s more vibes than story. If it has “lore.” If the soundtrack is just drones and creaks. If the screenplay is 80 pages long but the runtime is 127 minutes. If the IMDb ratings are all 10s and 1s. If it’s “really about X.” There are such a wide array of ways for movies to piss me off nowadays, and I am very happy leaving them to the people who enjoy them. I do hope that the success of these smaller movies will lead to a more diverse spectrum of movies being made, some of which might be in styles I can stomach. The problem with movies today is that they all take so long to make that trends that used to play out in a couple years tend to drag on for a decade. I’m extremely tired of the trends we’re going through now, and that includes both franchise pablum on the high end and somnambulant dirges on the low. I don’t think whatever’s coming is going to be my bag either but it might lead to something better. I can wait for the next pendulum swing. I’m in it for the long haul.

  14. My biggest problem with these new Evils Dead is that they just don’t have any memorable characters. I get that Bruce Campbell was a one of a kind talent, and I definitely don’t want them to try and cast a young new Ash. But in the original trilogy and the tv series, even a lot of the other characters were memorable. But in these last three, there is just zero charisma. I’ve seen Rise 3 times and I never remember anything about the characters. Instead, they have leaned into the “oooh gory and intense!” approach which can make for a fun first watch but once the initial shock is gone there just isn’t much there. To me, it just isn’t Evil Dead without some snark and slapstick. These new ones just feel kind of nihilistic to me and that just isn’t what I’m there for.

  15. grimgrinningchris

    July 15th, 2026 at 2:01 pm

    DTROYT…

    While I can’t argue with you (and won’t since I still haven’t seen this one and only clicked on the comments when it looked like chat had turned to THE BACKROOMS), at least in regards to the characters in ED13 or EDR, they are almost all still more distinct as people and as individual characters than anyone in the original movie (save for the possessed version of Cheryl). In the first one even Bruce is just some dude. We only project ASH onto ASHLEY now because we know who he became.

  16. grimgrinningchris –

    You may be right about the first one. I’ve seen it so many times over the years that I can’t honestly say for certain how I felt about the characters in that one the first time I saw it. But it seems so strange to me that the newer ones, even with the blessings of Raimi and Campbell, seem to lack any characters with a personality. I don’t even need them to be funny (although I would personally prefer it), but everyone just feels so generic to me and I think the movies suffer for it. I just can’t bring myself to care about what happens to these people. Then again, I suspect if they had gone in a different direction I might be saying that the characters are too colorful or trying too hard to recapture that original lightning in a bottle. So it’s probably a lose/lose proposition for anyone trying to make an Evil Dead movie (or I should say one which appeals to me)

  17. grimgrinningchris

    July 15th, 2026 at 3:37 pm

    I think (at least in the case of Rise) that that is on the writing. I think the pregnant (spoilers) roadie sister and especially the possessed older sister both give dynamite performances and the kids aren’t annoying movie kid moppets, even though they seem to have be written as just that. The good outweighs the no-as in that one for me though. And I am glad I saw it in the theater cuz the sound design alone (same can be said for ED13) got under my skin.

  18. Well, I guess the only way I’m going to settle this in my mind is to rewatch the entire series! What’s that? No, of course I wasn’t just looking for an excuse to do so this whole time.

    (And I do still enjoy the new ones. I just think they lack that certain something. Maybe/hopefully another watch will change my mind)

  19. After all these years I really miss the old Mr. Maj. No offense, no trying to suss you out. Just saying, I miss that dude. Best to you.

  20. I don’t know what you mean by that. Do you mean Earlier, Funnier Majestyk? Or Angry, Ranting Majestyk? Because one of those I miss too and the other one I don’t.

  21. Hh. I dunno, six of one a half-dozen of the other.
    I think that Maj of a decade ago would be open to watching something he was really not feeling if only to be able to take it apart based on its own merits or lack thereof.

    I’ll always go to bat for The Thin Man or Detour but we know those are great. But there’s SO much out there. A lot of it is “good enough”. I get the aging feeling of not wanting to waste time on mediocrity but I’ve let go of many of my “tasteful comvictions” over the years lest I alienate more and more people close to me with micro-negs. Who cares if I can’t stand Taylor Swift, if my fiancée does that doesn’t change my feelings for her so go ahead hon, sing along.

    Of course I don’t know you, only all the years of discourse, so if off base in anyway then I sincerely apologize and I’m gonna get back in my own lane.

    Uh, here’s what myself and the lady have out from the library right now:
    House of Wax (2005)
    Death Proof (weirdly, Wifey hasn’t seen it)
    The Batman (*sigh* I figured I’d give it another shot but I’m not looking forward to it)
    Alien: Romulus (see above comment but the lady loves Xenos)
    The Third Man (she’s never seen it and it’s one of my favorite novels, plus anything with Joseph Cotten is a must watch)
    The One (haven’t seen it since it came out and she hasn’t ever so let’s go!)
    Cape Fear (Scorsese, absolutely love the original and have intense memories of seeing this a little tot but haven’t watched since)

    Any thoughts guys?

  22. Yeah, but that Majestyk hadn’t lived through the collected works of Aster and Eggars. Ten years of STAR WARS sequels. Endless streaming spin-offs. A whole new cycle of horror remakes masquerading as legacy sequels. I’m tired, man. I only want to watch stuff I figure has at least a 50-50 shot bringing me some happiness. Most of the shit that comes out nowadays does not qualify. I usually try to stay out of it if I got nothing to say but “None for me, thanks” but sometimes I feel compelled to throw in my two cents.

    I treated myself to some Kino Lorber and Criterion sales offerings, so I’m watching Jacques Tati’s PLAY TIME right now. I got Chaplin’s THE GREAT DICTATOR lined up for later. I got new editions of both DESPERATE LIVING and HAIRSPRAY so I might make tomorrow a John Waters night. I also got:

    BLACKMAIL: Hitchcock’s (and England’s) first talkie
    RADIOLAND MURDERS: I haven’t seen it since I got big into 30s screwball comedy so I’m curious how it plays now that I’ll get the references
    WHITE RUSH: Mark L. Lester thriller from 2003 with Judd Nelson and Louis Mandylor. Demon Dave is on the special features!
    KING OF THE MOUNTAIN: Street racing movie from the early 80s with Harry Hamlin and Dennis Hopper
    THE BIG EASY: Sexy noir nonsense I haven’t seen since it was on pay cable every ten minutes
    THINGS TO DO IN DENVER WHEN YOU’RE DEAD: The rare Tarantino ripoff I haven’t seen
    THE BEAST: Russian tank on the loose in Afghanistan
    THE LIFT: Dick Maas’ Dutch original, not the remake with Naomi Watts
    ALL THAT JAZZ: It was featured heavily in the documentary series about American film Scorsese made for the BBC in the early 90s, which I watched recently. Made me curious.
    GOLDEN NEEDLES: Robert Clouse king fu gibberish with Jim Kelly and Joe Don Baker

    So I got a pretty weird week ahead of me.

  23. I’ve seen “Things to Do” but cannot remember anything about it.
    The Lift is really overlooked in the fucked up twist department. You should check out Stephen Laws “Darkfall”.
    And Golden Needles is just what I want it to be. It’s no Gymkata but it ain’t Enter either.

  24. Oh, and I gotta agree with you on THE THIN MAN. Both movie and book are perfect entertainment, precise and efficient with effortlessly iconic characterizations and more witty lines than in a dozen comparable movies. The sequels aren’t as good but they could have made a hundred of them and I’d have watched them all anyway.

    THE ONE is fun. HOUSE OF WAX has some excellent and elaborate production design. I’ve been meaning to watch CAPE FEAR again. I mostly remember the scene with Ileana Douglas. And DEATH PROOF is definitely bottom two Tarantino (I put it above HATEFUL EIGHT) but still pretty damn good. The first half gets a bad rap but I think it perfectly captures the vibe of a low-key perfect night out at your favorite local, the kind of night you don’t appreciate until they’re gone.

  25. Funny enough, I could’ve considered the restaurant bar they shot Death Proof in my local for over a decade. Hardly my favorite spot in ATX tho. Shoutout to Bender’s and Pinballz (250 pinball machines and BYOB!)

  26. Mr. Majestyk –

    I still remember the first time my film studies professor showed PLAYTIME (his own personal 16mm print!) back in 1990. The joy and gobsmacked reaction of everyone in the class was something else – I highlight of my film loving life. Truly one of the all-time greats. It remains a goal of mine to actually see it in a 70mm presentation before I shuffle off this mortal coil. Although the Criterion 4K is an incredible presentation of the film.

  27. I’m sure it suffers from being watched alone on an extremely not-giant screen, so my attention definitely wandered a few times. I probably missed a hundred gags. But once the nightclub sequence really got cooking, I was enthralled and delighted. Funny how we were just talking about the hangout atmosphere of DEATH PROOF, because that sequence built to a very different yet somehow complementary vibe. Just a random assortment of strangers and friends gathering in the shattered ruins of polite society to share an actual goddamn experience. I’ve never been to Paris, despite having the Frenchest government name you’ve ever heard in your life, but I had nights in New York that felt like the whole city was your backlot and everyone was your co-star. I’m sure it’s the same everywhere. The whole world’s a soundstage, after all.

  28. I liked it a lot, even though I do think modern horror is maybe leaning on themes of trauma and even this particular brand of trauma a bit much of late, and we could do with something else. Despite the more serious tone, this still got the most important aspect of the EVIL DEAD for me the right: the evilness of the dead. The Deadites shouldn’t be inscrutable, but just massively evil assholes who relish being fucked up and fucking with people. Though this is obviously their weakness in this instance as they could have just killed everyone much sooner and spent a bit longer searching the house for the dagger on their own. It ends up not being all that hard to find in the end after all.

  29. Now y’all got me thinkin’.

    We all know that every decade or so the zeitgeist of new horror joints changes to reflect the creators experiences and their reactions to the world around them NOW. Browning and his “freaks”, Hammer trying to hang on to “proper” Anglo tropes (but red blood), Castle knowing boys bring girls to jolt them into their arms, 70’s going smutty and grimy, slick 80’s brought crowds to Aliens and Predators, the 90’s knew that this material drew teens at this point so there was a calibration of “how far do we go?”, the aughts were just a drought as far as big projects went but a lot of great smaller films, the twenty-teens was the first big sea-change in some while.

    Now this new generation is tapping into what is here, now and relevant to the audience they are building it for. Better or worse, each generation is entitled to the art that speaks to them, not beholden to old farts like us who finger wag.

    If the kids like it, I find I have to remind myself of things like Pogs. If that’s their jam, rock on, it’s not stopping me from enjoying what I do.

    Not trying to step on anybody, do you. But I dunno Maj, Cuckoo was pretty…unique and seemed to me like a Ramsey Campbell 80’s short brought to screen. I dunno, you seem pretty well read so for me when a horror film feels like it was made by someone who’s done a few laps, it kicks for me.

    HOWEVER, I really did not dig Nosferatu or Late Night With the Devil and quite a few others.

    …geez, I just want more horror films that have a “high-concept” regarding their actual plot than how its filmed or presented. And some rad monsters.

    No spoilers but I’ve read Creggars Resident Evil script and I personally found it fantastic and couldn’t put it down. Breezy, wild and refreshing take on it all. It’s my most anticipated right now. I’ll get around to Odyssey.

  30. Okay, okay. I don’t want to clog the thread or anything but now that I’m thinking of it, my people here, what short horror story or novella from pre-aughts do you always wish had a film adaptation?

    I’ll start I guess. “A Tropical Horror” by William Hope Hodgson directed by Spielbergio. It would combine Jaws, Park and Private Ryan and fucking work (I guess kids say “cook” nowadays).

    And so I don’t sound like a total square, Karl Edward Wagner’s “Where the Summer Ends” is tailor made for a V/H/S segment, if they ever got the bright idea to just adapt existing material. Jesus, Campbell’s “Mackintosh Willy” would become as famous as It.

  31. A name very familiar in these parts is the writer/creator of FIRST BLOOD – David Morrell. He didn’t write too many short stories, but one in particular, ‘Orange is For Anguish, Blue is For Insanity,’ has been with me for decades. It’s the story of a young painter who tries to understand a 19th century (fictional) impressionist by reliving his life: staying where he slept, going where he lived etc. He slowly goes insane when he ‘realizes’ the secret to the masters work. Coralie Fargeat THE SUBSTANCE has both the visual/compositional panache to make a film adaptation.

    The second writer is the modern horror master Peter Straub. It’s amazing to me that more of his fiction has not been adapted into movies. After Stephen King, Straub is undoubtedly the most important modern horror writer. He has an entire sequence of short stories/novels entered around a sort of meta fictional conceit where Straub is actual interacting with fictional characters from his works (even going so far as to posit that some of the stories/novels we’re written in conjunction with real people whom have been fictionalized for the stories.) It’s all very nutty and unsettling. But the individual novella that has psychologically unsettled me for decades was one called ‘Mr. Clubb and Mr. Cuff.’ This is a very disturbing tale of other worldly killers who get hired to kill via the most demented torture imaginable, but the real gruesomeness is in both the way that they mentally undue the victims (whom they have genuine sympathy and respect for when they handle their fate with bravery and grace,) and in the arched, hyper stylized and elegant tone in which they relate the deeds. Kind of like torture porn via opera. It’s perhaps the most disturbing individual piece of fiction I’ve ever read. I’ve got no idea who could direct it, but what a movie it would make if it could be pulled off. Maybe Zach Cregger.

  32. “The Long Rain” by Ray Bradbury. It’s apparently been adapted as part of a couple anthologies but never had its own feature length. Filming it would be torture for the actors though.

  33. @Miguel, yeah, all the way. “Orange is for” hits so fucking hard. I know it’s a bit of an homage/pastiche of “The Color(sic)” but totally delivers.
    I first read it in a copy of an antho, “Out of Time and Space” which also had “Coulor”, “Who Goes There” and so much more. Jesus, that book was a wall-to-wall banger.

    Stories to be adapted…”Red Nails” would slap so hard. Howard had a grasp on pacing that just screams cinema. The fact that the story starts with Conan slaying a dragon with an apple seems like A24 material right now.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>