"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Terrifier 3

In 2022, a transgressive gorefest called TERRIFIER 2 was given a limited unrated release in AMC theaters. Kinda like GODZILLA MINUS ONE the next year it proved to be so popular they kept adding another set of screenings and another and another. There was enough of a buzz that I set aside my usual disdain for clown horror and fired up the first TERRIFIER on the ol’ Roku. That went pretty well so when TERRIFIER 2 screened in Seattle again I went, and kind of loved it. Later I caught up with ALL HALLOW’S EVE, the anthology made from two short films that introduced the idea of TERRIFIER.

So by the time of TERRIFIER 3 I’m a fully converted fan of the series, and there must be a whole lot of other people who followed that path, because this is truly unprecedented: an extremely gory unrated part 3 slasher movie that opened #1 at the box office. For extra laughs, it happened to beat out week two of a Hollywood evil clown sequel with literally a hundred times its budget. I’m pretty sure no one in the TERRIFIER camp was even trying to do that. But it’s a genuine phenomenon.

For the uninitiated I’ll give a little pitch for the series, which does not seem tailored for this level of mainstream recognition. It’s about Art the Clown (David Howard Thornton, some guy who played the Joker in a Nightwing fan film but turns out to be brilliant), a mysterious non-verbal clown who walks around on Halloween night with a garbage bag over his shoulder and commits sadistic murders. The first one is ambiguous about what his whole deal is, but in part 2 and 3 we have confirmation that he’s some sort of demon from Hell. I had liked the idea that he was just some misogynistic asshole living out his dreams on Halloween, but it gets much better the more outlandish it turns.

Writer/director/editor Damien Leone is also in charge of special makeup FX, and the thing that stands out most about the movies is the extravagant kill sequences that are sort of the horror equivalent of the fight scenes in a JOHN WICK movie. They have a similar spirit of envelope pushing and one-upmanship, but in this case they’re also a challenge to horror fans – how much can you take? That’s one reason these play so well in theaters. There’s a feeling of the audience going through something together that I’ve rarely seen outside of the JACKASS movies.

They’re also a tonal highwire act. I think of them as being somewhere in the blurry area between winky put-on and serious fucked up movie (though if I had to choose they’re closer to PLANET TERROR than ANGST). You will ideally be upset at times, but mostly having fun. The uncomfortable moment when you stop belly laughing because it’s gone too far is kind of their sweet spot.

I’ll go more into what I think makes Art the Clown so effective, but the other thing that really made this series click is part 2’s addition of Sienna Shaw (Lauren LaVera, body double for Anya Taylor-Joy in SPLIT). She’s a young person with normal human problems in addition to her horror movie ones, but also she’s a badass final girl, talented costume designer and possibly some sort of angel warrior destined to stop the evil of this fucking clown. At some point. The nihilism of the first film is part of what makes it unique, but once that’s balanced with Sienna’s element of hope the whole thing really starts to sing.

TERRIFIER 3 mixes some of the gritty nightmare feel of part 1 with the extra strength formula of part 2, and adds one major twist: it’s Christmas horror now! (Yet another reason it seems impossible it’s a big hit this October.) It cold opens as a killer Santa movie with some poor little girl telling Mommy she hears Santa on the roof. Mommy thinks it’s her imagination, but of course it’s you-know-who, and he does what he tends to do. One subtly wise choice made in this drawn out suspense sequence is that funny holiday gimmicks are saved for later, he’s just using an ax. So there’s no comedy to leaven the horrific atrocities he’s committing (uncharacteristically off screen, but with completely unrestrained sound effects). It’s only after we’ve had to stew in the ugliness for a while that we’re dared to laugh at a punchline about what he does after the massacre. (I did laugh but I think this is a choice every horror fan must make for themselves.)

Then it skips back five years to follow up on the insane ending of part 2, so we do get some Halloween representation. I love this chunk of weird demonic nightmare stuff, rooted in those shorts that introduced the character, but with more of a budget and improved directorial chops. It’s easy to compare Art to the slasher movie icons like Freddy and Jason, but it’s a little more SAW-like that he has as a supporting character like Victoria Heyes (Samantha Scaffidi, DEMON HOLE), who he basically mauled like he was a monkey, and she looks like a monster. I guess she’s now possessed by the little clown girl from part 2, but I’m glad I missed that because I always thought she was driven mad by her experience and continuing the cycle of violence, adding weight to Sienna’s struggles with PTSD and fears about inheriting mental illness. I suppose all that is still metaphorically true.

The story proper picks up with Sienna released from a mental hospital to spend the holidays with her aunt Jess (Margaret Anne Florence, THE IRISHMAN), uncle Greg (Bryce Johnson, SLEEPING DOGS LIE, WILLOW CREEK, GOD BLESS AMERICA) and younger cousin Gabbie (Antonella Rose, Fear the Walking Dead), who idolizes her. Sienna tries to hold it together and have a nice time but she’s plagued by hallucinations of her dead friends and then by a (correct, obviously) feeling that Art is coming for her.

Sienna’s little brother Jonathan (Elliott Fullam, voice of “Sal the Rooster,” Get Rolling with Otis) is now in college. I was wondering about this because 2 years have passed in real life, 5 in the movies, is that kid really old enough to be in college? Yes, it turns out, but seeming younger than his cool-guy roommate Cole (Mason Mecartea, 1 episode of Stranger Things) really works for the character. His neck and limbs have stretched out considerably but he still looks and sounds very young, that awkward transitional period into full adulthood. Perfect for a shy kid who used to be obsessed with serial killers who’s now trying to have a normal life after being terrorized by one.

Picking up the baton as a character morbidly obsessed with murder is Cole’s hot-girl girlfriend Mia (Alexa Blair, DIARY OF A WIMPY KID: THE LONG HAUL), who has a true crime podcast and the audacity to think Jonathan will be impressed by how much she’s followed his case. There’s a darkly hilarious moment where she’s musing about what it must feel like to be in the presence of an evil like Art the Clown just as he’s walking past her dorm. I love that Leone (SPOILER) does the later-FRIDAY-THE-13TH thing of a victim who’s easy to hate, followed by the TERRIFIER thing of going so overboard in her death that it obliterates any sense of “deserving it” in horror movie terms. And her ordeal may even be overshadowed by what happens to Cole, which feels to me like a retroactive counterweight for the most upsetting part of the first TERRIFIER. See? Men are also treated horribly in these movies.

It’s not just the disgusting things Art does to human flesh that make him a standout horror villain. He’s a genuinely interesting character to watch. Yes, he’s a demon on a mission from Hell or something, but he also has some worldly interests. He has a fondness for novelty sunglasses, creeping people out on public transportation, and getting kicked out of establishments (usually for peeing or pooping). Halloween gives him the ability to walk around in public without drawing much attention, but it feels like an escalation when has the balls to do it in December. One of the great scenes in T3 is when we find out where he got the costume. He’s so excited when he spots a Santa Claus (Daniel Roebuck, THE LATE SHIFT) in a bar. The poor Santa is amused by this weirdo (he nicknames him “Clowny”) and has no idea it’s doom for him and his friends (Clint Howard and Bradley Stryker).

I still think evil clowns are usually corny, but I called Art “ugly” in my TERRIFIER review, and I gotta confess that at some point I realized he’s an excellent design. The clean, solid black around his eyes and mouth work so well with Thornton’s exaggerated expressions, he’s got that simple black and white outfit that gets refreshed at the beginning of each chapter and then bloodied (such a funny reoccurring gag). He’s like both stages of a Ren & Stimpy character – the line drawing and the detailed close-up painting. I like looking at him now. He’s fascinating.

And he’s such a bastard! He continues to break slasher taboo by sometimes using guns, and worse. He could be mistaken for a terrorist in this one. I don’t want a future where this is commonplace in horror, but it has a real stomach-churning resonance here because it’s crossing the line between horror movie iconography and the sickness of modern real life violence. I think part of what makes Art powerful is that he’s so thoroughly despicable, even compared to Freddy, Jason and Michael. He is pure, disgusting evil, no iota of tragedy to his existence, no possible reason to feel sorry for him, no code or sense of fairness like Pinhead. I look forward to the day when Sienna figures out how to stop him for good, but also, I’m afraid, the guy makes me laugh. My point stands that he’s able to be funny Freddy without being grating because he has to do it without talking. Best of both worlds.

I think T3 is Thornton’s strongest performance to date. There are so many laugh out loud reactions and movements. Funnier than most non-evil clowns! But the laugh is rarely, if ever, the climax of a scene. Inevitably it’s the prelude to Art and/or the movie pushing things too far, making you feel a little self conscious that you were just laughing a second ago.

What I like more and more about these movies is their complex palate – deliberately using conflicting tones conventionally considered to not work together. Forgive me if I’ve used this analogy before but a favorite pizza topping combination for me is jalapeno and pineapple. There’s a burn, there’s a sweetness, those sensations bounce off each other, so it hurts a little, but mostly tastes good. Maybe for people less attuned to gore this is more like pineapple and ghost pepper. But the point is those two contrasting flavors bring something out of each other that can’t be achieved separately.

I think TERRIFIER 3 manages this sort of thrill ride at least as well as part 2. It flows a little better, deepens our attachment to the characters, and gives LaVera room for a really layered performance. I also like that (SPOILER) it leaves her a rescuing-Han-from-Jabba’s-palace type mission for the sequel. My one complaint is because she doesn’t get to fuck up Art as thoroughly as last time the ending is a little less satisfying. But that’s minor.

It’s weird to be judging this in October, but I do think TERRIFIER 3 is strong in the Christmas horror spirit, fulfilling my preference for season-specific imagery. It has snowy nights, Art dressed as Santa, a major mall Santa scene (and mall shopping), another Santa at a bar, Christmas milk and cookies, important presents under the tree, it even has a crown of thorns! It has Art decorating a tree with intestines and a severed head – that rates high. Also visual quotes of SILENT NIGHT DEADLY NIGHT and BLACK CHRISTMAS. It has numerous Christmas carols, and it’s pretty great that it has an original song called “It’s a Terrifier Christmas,” though I gotta note that it sounds pretty similar to “Christmas in the Playhouse” from the Pee-wee’s Playhouse Christmas Special.

I have read that Leone has an ending planned for the series that will probly be the next movie but could possibly turn into two more. Since T3 never actually makes it to Christmas day, and Leone says what he has planned for the next one is “almost experimental,” I’m thinking we’re gonna be opening our presents in Hell. I was hoping for the 4th of July, honestly, but I’m sure the final showdown with Sienna will provide some fireworks no matter the time of year. For now, I think I’m gonna watch the first one again and hopefully return to this one in December.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 16th, 2024 at 4:56 pm and is filed under Reviews, Horror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

27 Responses to “Terrifier 3”

  1. So i decided to check out what all the fuss is with Terrifier 3. I go in not having seen either of the previous Terrifier films. (Only read about them here)

    Vern you did an excellent job expressing my feelings about what i liked about the film, so thank you. Art and Sienna are both great characters and the actors really are doing a great job portraying them!

    Not gonna lie, though, I Noped out the cold open. (in typical me fashion, i got too high and that mixed with 6 yr old little girl thinks its Santa but its the killer clown… I just couldn’t handle it. I bugged out and took a piss, Came back, moved on and im ok. Which is crazy considering other things that happen)

    The Gore pieces are gross and fun, but its also kinda mean, but I also kinda like it. Mostly I think I’m just glad this exists and people are seeing it!

    I don’t feel the need to immediately watch the first 2 Terrifier movies but yeah, I get their appeal and I will eventually. Honestly I’ll follow Leone as well as the guy playing Art because that dude killed it. (Pun intended)

  2. I saw this at 1:20 on a Monday afternoon, and yeah, it was Columbus Day so some people had the day off, but you could have knocked me over with a feather and shoved a chainsaw up my taint when I saw that it was sold out. I haven’t had to sit next to a stranger at the movies this decade, and it’s for the second sequel to a movie literally nobody else I knew had even heard of for the first few years of its existence. And it was great! I’m glad I saw it with a crowd. The teen girls next to me fidgeted and squirmed and squealed and whimpered and cackled. It was delightful. Everybody totally went along for the ride. Gave me hope for the next generation.

    I don’t think there’s anything that tops THAT kill in Part 2, but the overall filmatism is much stronger and more confident in this one. The colors are richer, the pacing is smoother. Everything pops. Art has really come into his own as a slasher icon. Most slashers are either a Freddy or a Jason, but Art’s neither. Art’s Art. His “ain’t I a stinker?” cruelty-for-cruelty’s-sake feels exactly right for our times. He makes this series feel dangerous in a way no other contemporary horror does, and yet he’s also the most fun you’ll have at the movies.

    Guys, this series is a fucking miracle. The world’s a festering toilet fire and TERRIFER 3 is its king.

  3. When did Daniel Roebuck become a horror icon? Well “icon” is maybe too much, but after a decade or two of mostly playing comically douchy authority figures, he started to pop up in a whole bunch of indie horror flicks of varying quality.

  4. I thought it was from being one of the Rob Zombie Players, but I guess he had already been in FINAL DESTINATION and BUBBA HO-TEP before THE DEVIL’S REJECTS. Come to think of it, it may stem all the way back to RIVER’S EDGE at the beginning of his career. Not really horror but a formative fucked up true crime teen movie for people of my generation, and he was scary in it.

  5. This one has all the feel of a victory lap, and the fact it’s been so successful just adds to that retroactively. As Mr. Majestyk said, sometimes the world does make sense.

    The impression I got from the movie is… remember that bit on ZODIAC, when the killer gets so carried away killing a woman he lets her boyfriend survive? Here the focus is so much on the kills, the story, characters and everything else suffers. It doesn’t have the balance of part 2, and kind of feels like those marvel movies that’s just lining up things before the next installment actually advances the plot.

    But… it doesn’t matter. Holy shit, those kills. Holy shit. Its first ten(?) minutes are incredible, and should be enough to prove to anyone that these movies are fucking *legit*. The bar and mall scenes are a marvel of escalation, and as Vern points out, the use of humour as a weapon throughout (laugh, but you know you’ll feel shitty for laughing in just a minute) is unique and ridiculously powerful.

    I cannot wait for the next one; What a great series.

  6. I love this one – excited to see it again (after I have checked out Smile 2).

    I think the pairing of DHT and Leone is one of those movie magic miracles. There’s a sense watching the three of these that they’re both exploring the depths of their talent together – and neither of them have found the boundary yet. It is just one of those perfect chemistry things. I don’t think either would have been able to fully break through into the mainstream without each other. Their lives and careers will have really changed for good over the course of the last week.

    DHT’s performance in this one is really on a different level to the prior ones. The bit where he’s listening into the college couple’s conversation about him is so incredible.

    Vern nails perfectly what makes this series work so well. It is funny as well as scary (and DL is able to manage both kinds of tension and plays them against each other effectively). But that additional component is the sweetness and earnestness it brings to Sienna, her brother and their whole relationship. This is what so many of these ‘blood and honey’ etc video nasty wannabes miss.

    I loved the look of this film – T2 was inching towards it but this feels like the first time DL fully achieved what he was going for visually. You get modern slashers that try and ape Carpenter or Craven all the time – what I loved about this is that it feels like Damien was going more for this particular vibe of, like, the classiest-but-still-cheap horror titles that you get on labels like 88 Films’s slasher imprint (in the UK – more vinegar syndrome in the US). I have not heard it discussed as a reference but the visuals really brought 80s classic ‘The House on Sorority Row’ to mind for me – i adore that film.

    This feels like the arrival of a film that is gonna haunt the genre for a very long time. This is 100% getting a re-release at Christmas, and I can honestly see it as one of those films you’ll see programmed in independent cinemas and the odd chain in cities at every Christmas from here on out.

    I love that DHT is openly campaigning to be made the Joker in the new rebooted DC canon (and I was listening to him talk about it in an interview and it is like the prospect sets off a fire inside him). I wouldn’t bet on this happening but Gunn is probably the only studio exec at that level that’d even consider it (and I do think a silly, camp Joker is kind of a necessary correction now that Joker: FAD has shown us the prestige-ified oscar-bait take on the role slamming into a wall).

  7. I love that DHT is openly campaigning to be made the Joker in the new rebooted DC canon

    So that he can be a psychotic clown in two franchises?

    I mean, good luck and all… But… yeah…

  8. Great review. After scolding someone else for dissing IN A VIOLENT NATURE for the sin of doing what it set out to do, I’m realizing I might have done the functional equivalent with TERRIFIER 1 and 2. I didn’t like either of these when I did my obligatory “so, what’s all the fuss about” watch last year. But there is so much about this that I want to like and support on paper — original 2010s/2020s era franchise with no prior IP, new iconic slasher, theatrical slasher film release, successful underdog theatrical slasher film release, film that is transgressive in an era with lots of safetyism and pearl clutching. So, now with this great review, I feel like I need to go back and try again. And if I still don’t like it, I will either shut up about it (doubtful) or at least focus my criticisms on things that don’t work for me vs. criticizing it for being a deliberately transgressive, boundary-pushing, torture-y gorefest with a central slasher whose whole steez is mugging and mincing and sashaying. Like, I have to accept that as the proposition going in and decide whether I can get on board. I do really like the idea behind the worldbuilding and of having winning and interesting characters you care about. So, I’ll go once more into the breach, largely on the strength of this passionate and thoughtful review.

  9. Only just watched the first two TERRIFIERs. That first one wasn’t really my thing, but I was pleasantly surprised by the second one, which was a level up in just about every way– better, messier, more interesting characters, an actual story, a weird supernatural mythos that is thankfully left unexplained, just overall better production design, filmatism, etc. So I’m interested to find out if the third one continues the streak.

    Based on their reputation, though, I expected these movies to be way gorier. I mean, they’re gory, but– I was braced for a lot worse. But maybe I’m just a weirdo.

    As for Daniel Roebuck, he’s from a nearby town and so I see him in the news a few times a year. Usually he’s filming some kind of Hallmark-y production locally, so I always forget he has horror cred. Fun that his career ranges so widely from family-friendly Christian stuff to gorehound deathstravaganzas.

  10. These movies make me feel like Tipper Gore and I don’t like that one bit, but also just reading the review makes me sure I won’t want to watch these. No judgement towards those who partake though, I do enjoy seeing this underdog scary clown movie overtake the billion dollar incel comic scary clown movie. I just have no desire to be grossed out by either.

  11. What strikes me about Art The Clown is that I think for him it’s less about murder and dismemberment and more about breaking taboos. He’s not only a savage killer, he’s rude. It seems really calculated who he decides to murder, as far as people who are otherwise kind to him versus those who don’t cotton to a mute clown covered in blood. Sometimes, being a good person just doesn’t matter. And when he kills in front of someone else, he’s always mocking how that person is horrified by what just happened. The highlight of these series’ is probably that unique murder of that woman in part two, around the halfway point, and it’s basically because she won’t tolerate him randomly ringing her doorbell and doing a gross bit. And then in this one, when he goes into the college dorm for that horrible kill of the couple in the shower, is he just passing random students nearby? Is he killing them? I choose to believe maybe he partied with a few of them, and when he was done, the ones left hanging around got savagely destroyed. He doesn’t strike me as a guy that keeps track of these things.

    Compared to part two, I do feel this was a little bit of a comedown. I feel like they step back a little bit from Sienna as being destined to be an angel warrior, aside from a little superficial lip service. She kicks more ass in part two than she does here, whereas I feel like she should be leveling up a bit. And as far as a cliffhanger at the end, I have a hard time conceptualizing exactly where this ending leaves us. Sienna has to chase Art into Hell to rescue her niece? Does Art take public transportation to that Hell?

  12. GlaiveRobber – Re: Your first sentence, I think that is part of the difficulty I have getting on the character’s wavelength, just personal preference-wise. Most slashers I like are silent killers who are interested in killing you, not performing for you or outraging you. The obvious exception and closest cousin/precedent of the perfomative killer is NIGHTMARE 3 and beyond Freddy Krueger. However, people generally regard that as a kind of dilution and domestication of scary Freddy (c. NIGHTMARE 1 and 2), which is the whole premise of NEW NIGHTMARE. Moreover, I don’t Freddy is nearly as performative as Art, which makes sense: Art’s a performance artist after all.

    However, when you talk about taboo-breaking, I think that’s just it for me. It’s a character and a movie that is shot through with look-at-me performative edgelordism: Marilyn Manson on steroids and PCP. I like a good story, monster, iconography, worldbuilding, and I don’t really enjoy realistic-seeming, drawn-out, wince-inducing torture of sympathetic characters. It’s more about the stalk, the rest of the mythology and iconography, and I like a quick kill. WOLF CREEK was a tough watch for me. Good movie, but tough watch and the sadism and torture aspect sat with me and made me feel bad. HOSTEL 1 was similar and close, but it had a good mystery / caper element, and I could ultimately get on board. I am not really built for the “you think that’s fucked up (?!), well wait til you see this” mutilation-torture olympics. For me with Art, it’s the combination of torture horror olympics with the aggressive performative look-at-me-ism, which has no real close analogue in HOSTEL or WOLF CREEK — those killers are sadists, to be sure, but Art’s next level with the performative aspects that amount to a kind of constant fourth-wall-breaking (in feel if not literally so). I think that’s a really elaborate way of saying I like the strong silent types delivering quick, cartoonish kills (usually to characters who are forgettable or unsympathetic) — vs. drawn-out physical and psychological torture of highly sympathetic characters. Even the log-splitter kill in IN A VIOLENT NATURE was a bit much for me. So, I think that’s what make these a tough sell for me, but I certainly would like to get in on the fun and not be a hater.

  13. @Skani, I completely get what you mean. What I find interesting, though, is that beyond that artifice and that edgelord-type mentality is the truth that Art genuinely enjoys this stuff. I don’t think any mass murderer in movies has ever had as much fun as Art. Which is it’s own sort of perversity, when you think about it — the complete absence of irony. I really do think Art, when he’s not killing people, is wandering around going, “Bells are cool! Hats are cool!” It is established as canon that he loves novelty glasses. The bit in the second movie where he starts hallucinating a little girl doppelganger is the most amusing, because you’d think Art would act shitty towards such a little creature. But he believably seems like he’s psyched to have a sidekick.

  14. Good stuff. Yes, it definitely seems like Leone cares deeply for this unique character and has invested him with a mojo and inner life all his own.

  15. I liked it alright. I feel like they absolutely wrecked it in the editing department though. Seems like huge chunks of plot and even many kills were removed for the theattrical release. I mean, come ON! Sienna’s brother and uncle supposedly getting killed off-screen, Art goes to a frat party with a chainsaw, and only kills TWO people!! I was pumped to see him carve up some frats bros, but it just cut to Sienna’s house, and then Art and the lady demon are just there somehow! I didn’t care much for the added story in Part 2, I think the lack of story is why I enjoyed the first so much, but this time it is just like it’s 12 completely unrelated segments that were haphazardly edited together. Also, Art was a little too goofy in this one. I like the physical humor, but his whole routine in the bar was a bit of a stretch.

  16. My favorite bit of Art character development is that he washes his hands after taking a piss.

  17. I watched the first 3 in reverse order Terrifier 2 then Terrifier then All Hallows Eve so for me the films just kept getting worse, but also it may have helped me because I might not have kept watching if I started at the beginning, but now I saw part 3 and I think it’s probably the best one yet even though as everyone points out it doesn’t have a kill to rival Allie’s from part 2. I really like Art the Clown. He’s “fun” like Freddy or Chucky, but silent like Michael or Jason so I don’t have to hear a thousand lame puns. Dude just loves killing people.

  18. I liked that it just launched right into the finale. Not only did it skip all the rote shoe leather we’d have to endure to get us to the showdown we all know is inevitable, it was also just a great shock. It’s so sudden that at first you assume it’s a dream sequence, but then it keeps going and it’s like, “Oh shit, we’re doing this.” It’s disorienting in an interesting way.

    SPOILER: To me it’s pretty clear the brother’s not dead. I bet we’ll get a flashback in Part 4 showing what happened to him and the uncle. I’m not nuts about this series succumbing to franchisitis and ending this installment without a real climax because they’re saving it for the next one, but I trust that Leone doesn’t leave raw meat on the table like that.

  19. “first 3 in reverse order Terrifier 2 then Terrifier then All Hallows Eve so for me the films just kept getting worse, but also it may have helped me because I might not have kept watching if I started at the beginning”
    Ha, I have also been making my way through in reverse and think I appreciate it more that way. Seeing part 2 with some actual characters and hints of story and humanity showed me that Leone wasn’t a pure sadist or someone who should just be doing his (impressive) effects work on other people’s movies.

  20. Woohoo! Just got back from Exhumed Films’ 24 Hour Horrorthon in Phoenixville. Fifteen movies, 35mm prints, and they don’t tell you what they’re showing until it starts! This year it was
    1. Mario Bava’s BLACK SUNDAY
    2. Stephen King’s SILVER BULLET
    3. THE GHOST OF FRANKENSTEIN
    4. BEYOND THE DARKNESS, with music by Goblin!
    5. Bernard Rose’s personal print of PAPERHOUSE!
    6. John Frankenheimer’s PROPHECY
    7. Dario Argento’s FOUR FLIES ON GREY VELVET
    8. The truly gross Shaw Brothers horror smut epic SEEDING OF A GHOST
    9. The black and white SHADOW OF A CAT
    10. Shaw Brothers/Hammer mashup LEGEND OF THE SEVEN GOLDEN VAMPIRES
    11. Roger Corman’s THE DAY THE EARTH ENDED
    12. Grace Jones in Richard Wenk’s VAMP
    13. The Lovecraft adaptation NECRONOMICON
    14. Bill Paxton’s FRAILTY
    and finally
    15. JOHN CARPENTER’S VAMPIRES.

  21. Damn, that’s one hell of a lineup!

  22. grimgrinningchris

    October 21st, 2024 at 5:28 am

    But Jerald? Have you seen Terrifier 3? Did you go to the Exhumed Films Horrorthon?

  23. Nabroleon Dynamite

    November 1st, 2024 at 5:05 pm

    I was a little disappointed with this one. I think 2 remains the best of the series.

    I think they made Art a little too silly in his reactions for comedic effect this go round. I like him to be more terrifying with a nice touch of comedy when called for, but this one seemed to push a laugh when it wasn’t necessary.

    Anyway, I’m glad it’s succeeding and I’m down for parts 4&5 when they drop.

    Also, isn’t it time we respect the “Damien Leone” in the title of “Damien Leone’s Terrifier 3” on some “Tyler Perry” shit?

    Peace!

  24. I think it’s really cool that Damien Leone not only took to heart the criticisms he got for misogyny in All-Hallows’ Eve and the first Terrifier, but he also wrote it as part of the second and third films with the characters of Sienna and her father.

  25. Looks like Daniel Roebuck is quite the genre fan as his collection was featured on an episode of MeTV’s Collector’s Call…
    https://www.metv.com/collectorscall/collection/meet-daniel-roebuck-inside-the-collection

  26. Ha, nice, thanks for posting that. Of course he would hang out with someone like Rob Zombie.

  27. I just saw him as one of the talking heads on the documentary on the Vincent Price HOUSE OF WX blu-ray, alongside such other luminaries as Joe Dante, Wes Craven, Martin Scorsese, and Rick Baker. He talked extensively about the uncredited makeup artist who invented foam rubber. The man’s got cred.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>