"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Red Eye (20th anniversary revisit)

August 19, 2005

RED EYE is a simple thing: a tight and well-made PG-13 thriller, nothing deep, but entertaining to just about anybody. And it happens to be the only movie like that directed by the late great Wes Craven, and he made it post-SCREAM trilogy using all those chops gained from shooting Woodsboro scrapes and chases. But it’s really in more of a suspense vein than a horror one, and it starts out feeling like a DIE HARD type movie, with quick shots depicting some so-far indecipherable sinister plot (the stealing of a wallet, the preparation and delivery of a mysterious crate), and establishing a set of characters in the bustle of the airport while a bunch of flights are delayed.

SUMMER 2005Lisa (Rachel McAdams, also the primary victim in WEDDING CRASHERS) was in Dallas for her grandma’s funeral, she’s headed home for Miami and already receiving calls from work. But she’s a self-declared “people pleaser, 24-7” so she doesn’t mind helping flustered hotel employee Cynthia (newcomer Jayma Mays, later in the SMURFS and PAUL BLART franchises) placate irate regulars the Taylors (Robert Pine and Teresa Press-Marx).

It’s easy to see that most of this is setting us up with important information, especially when they discuss preparations for a suite for Homeland Security Deputy Secretary Charles Keefe (Jack Scalia, FEAR CITY), who we also see on the TV in the airport. But that’s part of the fun of a movie like this: studying how the machinery works, watching the pieces all moving closer together until they connect.

The villain is one Jackson Rippner (he points out that it’s a ridiculous name), played by Cillian Murphy, our friend from BATMAN BEGINS. It’s brilliant casting because it understands Murphy’s eyes are both dreamy and creepy and should be used for both in one movie. Craven recognizes that we know he’s the bad guy (Marco Beltrami’s score wouldn’t lie to us) so it’s very uncomfortable seeing him talk to Lisa in line at check-in, end up having a drink with her at the bar, making conversation, being charming. I still don’t think it serves much if any purpose to his plan, it’s just a way to make it more painful when he reveals he’s not just some guy she talked to and turned out to be sitting next to her, he’s the guy who has someone watching her dad (Brian Cox, FOR LOVE OF THE GAME), ready to harm him if she doesn’t make the phone call they want her to.

Despite her usual philosophy, Lisa does not want to please this particular people, so it’s a battle of wills as she finds ways to delay making the call, tries to signal for help, etc. The simplicity of the scenario and the location help Craven squeeze out plenty of stress and discomfort as she struggles to avoid giving in while having to pretend to others everything is normal. And Craven establishes a whole network of other passengers who are mostly unnamed and unimportant but do enough to register as characters – for example we see an unaccompanied minor named Rebecca (Brittany Oaks, “Thing Two” from THE CAT IN THE HAT) noticing things going on and being suspicious of Rippner before ultimately (spoiler) tripping him to help Lisa escape. Good kid.

Like SPEED (spoiler) it does eventually arrive at a destination for a different type of action. Though this is a different genre for Craven it’s hard to say it’s a huge stretch from what he’s known for, and it’s kind of thrilling when – having already been terrorized, threatened, head-butted, forced to do Rippner’s bidding and play along as he tells the flight attendant that she’s just emotional – Lisa gets to follow in the g.o.a.t. final girl tradition of A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET’s Nancy Thompson for the climax. She doesn’t quite set booby traps but it’s a similar concept of the monster invading the sanctity of her childhood home and her using the home field advantage to overcome him in a ruthless battle. It really does feel like a non-fighter overcoming a professional by digging deep into herself and letting loose on the motherfucker. She doesn’t suddenly have fighting prowess.

Also there’s a real good falling-down-the-stairs stunt. I don’t know for sure she did that fall, but MacAdams’ stunt double is Sonja Munsterman (Summer Glau’s double on Firefly and in SERENITY). Stunt coordinator is Joel Kramer (Arnold’s double on COMMANDO, RAW DEAL, PREDATOR and THE RUNNING MAN who moved up to stunt coordinator for RED HEAT, TWINS, TOTAL RECALL, KINDERGARTEN COP, T2, LAST ACTION HERO, TRUE LIES, JUNIOR, ERASER, and JINGLE ALL THE WAY and also became Michael Mann’s guy starting with HEAT).

It does occur to me now that it kinda seems like old hippie Craven had to somewhat buy into the system for this one. We see a clip of Keefe’s controversial tough talk on TV and it makes him seem like some macho asshole, but former cheerleader (we see her uniform in dad’s closet) Lisa swears he’s “a good man” and nothing else in the movie says otherwise. Of course 2005 was only a few years into the reign of Homeland Security, long before its current days as a paramilitary gang terrorizing minorities for a deranged pedophile reality show host, but it was already seen by many of us as a scary organization with an Orwellian name, so it’s kind of un-Craven-like to just present them as the good guys.

But, you know. It’s a quick little thriller, they probly weren’t assassinating him for good reasons, they shouldn’t’ve tried to blow up his kids, and especially shouldn’t’ve fucked with Lisa. And my original review was correct in pointing out the wisdom of Rippner not caring about the motive for the assassination: “Cillian is just doing his job, he doesn’t give a shit about the politics and, even better, doesn’t bother to brag about that he doesn’t give a shit about the politics.“

I’m not surprised that I zeroed in on the customer service aspect of the story, and it’s funny because I didn’t quite remember how things would turn out. I was genuinely in suspense as to whether or not Lisa would disavow her initial “the customer is always right” attitude. I love that even in this very short movie Craven knew it was important that after the murderous terrorist is taken care of Lisa has time to confront the true villains: the entitled couple who chewed out a lady at the desk of the hotel. Most of us will never get anywhere near a political assassination, but we’ll encounter this type of unforgivable villainy repeatedly. Send ’em to hell, Lisa.

These days people (myself included) get excited for the rare major motion picture that comes in at less than 90 minutes. You just don’t see it very often anymore. To be honest, though, some of them end up feeling like too little, like I actually would’ve gotten more out of it if it was longer. Not the case here. This is the exact right amount of RED EYE. A perfect serving.

Much of Craven’s crew were veterans. Director of photography Robert D. Yeoman is known primarily for working with a different Wes – he’d already shot Wes Anderson’s first four movies and has done five more since then, plus several shorts. The co-editor is Patrick Lussier, Craven’s usual guy going back to Nightmare Cafe. Lussier had already directed DTV sequels for Miramax, and later graduated to theaters for MY BLOODY VALENTINE, DRIVE ANGRY and TRICK.

The actors were mostly pretty established, but have exploded since then. Murphy got the Oscar for that one movie. Cox got like a hundred Emmys or whatever. McAdams got a supporting actress Oscar nomination for SPOTLIGHT and a paycheck for the DOCTOR STRANGE movies but let me tell you if you haven’t seen her in ARE YOU THERE GOD? IT’S ME, MARGARET that’s the one that made me realize I’d been undervaluing her. It’s a movie pushing buttons that I do not have on my dashboard, not having ever been a girl or a parent, but the sucker made me cry, and she was the secret weapon. She did not get any nominations for that one but is being given the more prestigious award of starring in the next Sam Raimi movie.

There’s one now familiar face in the supporting cast: Kyle Gallner plays a character called “Headphone Kid’s Brother,” but it’s a bigger character than that sounds like. Weirdly he’s been in two other movies with “red” in the title (RED, also with Brian Cox, and RED STATE) as well as two other movies based on Wes Craven movies (A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET 2010 and SCREAM 2022). I finally started remembering who he was after STRANGE DARLING.

RED EYE was a hit ($96 million on a $26 million budget), and I think it’s nice that Craven got to have one big popular movie that stands on its own without having to support the weight of a franchise. Unfortunately he only lived another ten years after this, during which time he directed two more movies – MY SOUL TO TAKE (one of his most insane – I enjoyed it) and SCREAM 4 (plays much better for me years after the fact). In a sense maybe those last years were also spent securing his legacy by being the hands-on producer of two actually good remakes of his classics – THE HILLS HAVE EYES (2006) and THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT (2009). Notably the latter was co-written by Carl Ellsworth, the tv writer (Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Mortal Kombat: Conquest, Cleopatra 2525) credited with RED EYE’s screenplay (sharing story credit with Dan Foos).

Anyway, RED EYE holds up.

 

trivial note: I noticed on the credits that the asshole passenger (“Irate Man” they call him) is played by Loren Lester, who I know as the voice of Dick Grayson on Batman: The Animated Series. Others may know him as Jordan Knight on the New Kids On the Block cartoon. It took me a second but I could hear it.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 3rd, 2025 at 12:12 pm and is filed under Reviews, Thriller. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

11 Responses to “Red Eye (20th anniversary revisit)”

  1. I had seen this once in the theater, but hadn’t really thought about it in years, but it came to mind while I was watching Drop as a similar little thriller so I rewatched it a few days later it totally holds up. Not an all time classic, but definitely above average. Good job, Wes.

  2. I really liked this one back in the day so I’m glad to hear it held up. I’ll have to give it a rewatch. Rachel McAdams is so good in this. The way she’s able to maintain terrified and stressed but trying to hide it for almost the entire movie impressed the hell out of me. I hope she took a long vacation at a spa after filming this.

  3. I liked this. And Maggie’s right. McAdams is really good in this. And Cillian….I realize he’s now ascended to the ranks of “GREAT AK-TOR” and he truly is…but the man remains an absolute natural as a villain. Those eyes, the measured, breathy and conversational tone of his voice, all barely masking some deep, fucked up shit inside him. He’d stick a knife in you while casually enquiring about your day as he twists it in.

  4. Saw this in the theater and liked it a lot, but its considerable merits will always be slightly overshadowed by the fact that I had an experience during the screening that is almost impossible to replicate today. Dear Letters to Penthouse, I never thought something like this would happen to me, but: the projectionist fucked up and switched the (I think) 3rd and 4th reels around. This was potentially disastrous as thrillers tend to have a lot of plot business going on throughout, but I think this one was spared the worst of it by being set in one location for so much of its running time. We only realized what was up once the misplaced 3rd reel was well into it, and at that point what are you gonna do? I should rewatch this again to see if it plays as well in its intended sequence.

  5. There’s a really cool alternate trailer for this one (sadly available only in like 360p on YouTube) which plays almost the same trick as the film, really selling it as a meet-cute romcom, then going full-on thriller, and I play it to my (Gen z) students during the genre class of my screenwriting course. It has never yet failed to get them all wanting to see the film – there’s always recognition for Murphy, and then I throw in the running time of the film after as well. Best time was when I had a class of 12, and *immediately* the trailer finished, 12 pairs of hands started looking up the film on their laptops. I’ve also already referenced The People Under The Stairs earlier in the session talking about what you can do with genre, and stressed Craven’s name, so when it appears in the trailer it becomes its own twist.

    Also very much co-sign how brilliant Are You There God, It’s Me, Margaret is – it was the last film I watched in 2023, and with two hours until midnight on NYE, shot straight to number 2 in my top ten of the year.

  6. Yeah, the RomCom trailer is brillant! It always gets a reaction out of everybody who sees it for the first time and I credit it for the movie’s success. Sadly I still haven’t seen it for whatever reason. 20 years. I should finally get to it.

  7. The new I KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER had a trailer that pulled a similar truck, playing like a standard rom-com trailer before the reveal of the titular phrase on a greeting card at a lavish bridal shower. It was clever enough to get me to see the movie, which turned out to be the dopiest piece of IP-brained slop I’ve seen in some time. It made the original look like the work of master craftsmen. I wish Vern had reviewed it.

  8. It feels like Serenity has come up so much in the Summer 2005 retrospective– it didn’t come out until the end of September, so it wouldn’t fit this series, but would make such a fascinating subject for a look back. An aggressively 2005 movie (there’s Kasabian in the trailer!)

  9. Majestyk – I promise to see it, there were just too many other movies I wanted to see more at the time. I have plans to watch it on VOD with friends.

    PJ – That’s a good idea, I really have no idea how it will play even just because I haven’t rewatched Firefly in maybe those full 20 years.

  10. I rewatched Firefly during COVID and, unfortunately, I think the subsequent Whedon-ness in the culture (both his writing and his behavior) did not help the series. Still like the concept of it, not all episodes are great (always felt this way – the brothel episode is rough), and most of the actors are good – it is just that it no longer feels like a “what if?” series. Ever since Arrested Development came back I have held a “be careful what you wish for” belief in regards to dead series.

    That said, I did really enjoy Serenity in the theaters and again later on DVD. I haven’t watched it again though and worry that my experience with Firefly might carryover.

  11. I rewatched Firefly with a bestie at the start of this year out of morbid curiosity (and she’d never seen it, although Buffy is a building block of our friendship) and it really solidified my strong preference for Serenity. A lot about Firefly is really inspired and fully-formed from episode 1, but it Really buckles under the weight of the Whedon baggage. Serenity doesn’t have any of the comfy hangout libertarian sitcom charm of the show, but what it does have is a really lean, delicious screenplay and an absolutely gorgeous, strange score from a starkly-against-type David Newman. I would even make the case that Serenity as an individual movie might be Whedon’s strongest work? Not sure if you’ll agree, but I’m curious!

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>