"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

It Chapter Two

When IT CHAPTER TWO came out six years ago I heard that it was really bad (a subjective opinion) and two hours and fifty minutes long (a verifiable measurement). The “bad” part isn’t really a dealbreaker for a courageous viewer like yours truly, but combined with the length it was intimidating. Still, I intended to see it because I’m a horror fan and a merciful soul (I didn’t even hate director Andy Muschietti’s followup THE FLASH) and I promised friends I would see it so we could talk about it. But every October since it’s sat there on my list.

This month I watched a Sophia Lillis and a Finn Wolfhard and a couple Bill Skarsgårds and I decided it was time to stop running. It was time to go back home and face IT CHAPTER TWO. I’m not proud of it but my method was to watch it in three one-hour installments like a TV show. I know that’s not the way to watch an epic and I wouldn’t normally do it, but it finally got me through. (And the filmmakers probly figured out that was the best way to do it too, because they’re just starting a prequel TV series called Welcome to Derry.)

I should mention a few other reasons this was not the ideal open-minded viewing. I haven’t read the book since I was a kid, don’t remember much specific (except that one part) and I have zero memory of all the cosmic shit that Stephen King nerds wanted to be in the movie. There are rumors of a turtle, but I cannot confirm. I also haven’t seen the mini-series since I was a kid and I haven’t seen the first IT movie since it came out in 2017. So the truth is that as I watched the adult versions of the kid characters from part 1 I didn’t really remember exactly who they were or what they did in the first one. I do remember the joke about New Kids On the Block, which has a callback here (as I sense most things people liked in chapter 1 did).

IT CHAPTER TWO opens in September, 1989 as Beverly (Lillis) tells the rest of the kids who call themselves The Losers Club about a vision she had of them as adults and Bill (Jaeden Martell, Y2K) makes them all “Swear if It isn’t dead, if It ever comes back, we’ll come back, too.” He’s assuming they will all grow up to get the fuck away from this town, and he’s mostly right.

The exception is Mike (Chosen Jacobs, SNEAKERELLA), who grows up to be played by Isaiah Mustafa (BOY KILLS WORLD). It turns out that part of the evil of It is that if you leave town you’ll forget about It. Since Mike never moves out of Derry he remembers everything and when It starts happening again it falls upon him to get the rest of the Losers Club back in town and remind them about It. Mike works as a librarian, with two side gigs: monitoring the police band for signs of killer klowns, and narrating IT CHAPTER TWO, while all the other Losers go on to high paying careers in various cities.

This being based on a Stephen King book, obviously Bill grows up to be a famous author (played by James McAvoy, THE POOL). He’s currently involved with the movie adaptation of one of his bestsellers (directed by Peter Bogdanovich!), which is already filming even though everyone agrees that Bill sucks at writing endings and the ending of the book sucks and must be changed and he has not yet written the new ending. Which seems like a terrible but also realistic way to make a movie. It reminds me of another book adaptation I saw, where the book skipped between when the characters were kids and when they were adults, and they condensed it to just be about the kids, but then they made a sequel where they did the adult part but also they knew everybody liked the kids so they also made some new scenes with the kids. Not a great basis for telling a good story, but what are you gonna do when there’s already a release date?

Richie (Wolfhard) also grows up to be famous – a comedian played by Bill Hader (POWER RANGERS). Beverly (now Jessica Chastain, THE HUNTSMAN: WINTER’S WAR) is not famous exactly but created a clothing brand they all know. Ben (Jeremy Ray Taylor, GEOSTORM / Jay Ryan, Law & Order Toronto: Criminal Intent) lost weight and started an architectural firm, Eddie (Jack Dylan Grazer, SHAZAM! / James Ransone, THE AMERICAN ASTRONAUT) is an insurance company risk analyst, and Stan (Wyatt Oleff, KARATE KID: LEGENDS / Andy Bean, MALIGNANT) co-founded a large accounting firm. No truck drivers, landscapers or house painters in this bunch.

Present day Derry is still full of wholesome-seeming-but-actually-isn’t-it-really-creepy-when-you-think-about-it small town imagery like a carnival (with lots of clowns), a night time little league game, a Paul Bunyan statue (that will turn animated and attack Wolfhard like a deleted scene from one of his GHOSTBUSTERS movies), and a “Canal Days” festival where the mascot is the same beaver costume from HUNDREDS OF BEAVERS. It all starts when a gay couple (Xavier Dolan, BAD TIMES AT THE EL ROYALE and Taylor Frey, THE HOLIDAY EXCHANGE) enjoying the carnival get harassed and attacked by a family of homophobic bullies. I’m pleasantly surprised they aren’t (as far as I can tell) related to Henry Bowers (Nicholas Hamilton, CAPTAIN FANTASTIC / Teach Grant, THE THICKET), the bully from part 1 who returns as a possessed berserker. These non-Bowerses throw one of the men off a bridge where he does not drown but floats over and gets eaten by the current #2 evil clown in cinematic horror, Pennywise (Skarsgård, WHITE WATER FURY).

It’s an evil fuckin town, and not only in ways that seem supernatural. The constant gay bashing, the fat kid getting bullied by having his belly straight up slashed, the headlines calling Mike’s parents “two crackheads” when they die in a fire. (I guess that is supernatural, because in the end the headline changes.) It’s all part of a central theme that I do find interesting: the evil of It works in conjunction with small town small-mindedness. Just before the incident, Adrian and Don were talking about moving to New York to get away from this shit. As described above, all but one of the Losers did get away from this shit, and even forgot about it! Yeah, I guess they’re all in bad relationships, especially the ones who were abused by their parents, so maybe the idea is that they have to go back and face It before they can move on with their lives. Otherwise Mike is being pretty selfish dragging them back. I guess his reason is that if they don’t stop him he’ll get more powerful and escape Derry and ruin cities also, which would be a bummer. Like DEMONS with more bigotry.

When a movie is good I don’t mind it being long. Sometimes I prefer it. I do not believe this one earns the epic length. Maybe give it 100 minutes instead of 90 so they can be leisurely about the reunion at the Chinese restaurant (“Jade of the Orient”) before they start remembering. But other than that and the complication of having so many characters in two different time periods (the flashback scenes mostly unnecessary) it’s basically just a Blumhouse-style ghost movie, a series of encounters with weird shit, some more effective than others. For me I think a series of weird encounters requires a stronger narrative backbone and a sense of momentum. This feels more like getting lost for hours. A surprising number of the events are the adults remembering a weird monster they saw when they were a kid; there’s not even a pretense of danger because we know they survived and forgot about it until now.

I did like Muschietti’s movie MAMA, which introduced his talent for ghosty imagery, often digitally enhanced. Those sorts of things are the highlights here. The scene where Beverly visits her childhood apartment and discovers photos of Pennywise when he was alive is completely ludicrous, but I like the gag where she doesn’t notice the old lady (Joan Gregson, Storm of the Century) scurrying around naked and turning into a monster behind her. And the monster reminds me of Phyllis Diller in THE BONEYARD.


There are a bunch of fun bits like that. I enjoyed Pennywise getting a big mouth like the Reapers in BLADE II, various surreal helium balloon appearances, a crying-baby-faced bug creature that crawls out of a fortune cookie, a crawling eyeball, various zombified past victims (sometimes animated, sometimes animatronic), an animated hallucination when Mike doses Bill to explain a BILLY JACK/ON DEADLY GROUND style vision quest he went on, a swarm of tiny hands grabbing out of the sewer, a really good THE THING style severed-head-with-spider-legs, a giant Pennywise with crab legs, which falls over, impales itself and pukes up fire.


There’s lots of stuff that would fit well in an EVIL DEAD. If the best of this stuff was in a quick movie with a good, simple premise I might’ve loved it.

Muschietti and cinematographer Checco Varese (PROM NIGHT, G20) seem to have fun playing around (there’s a shot from under a glass table looking through the one missing piece of a puzzle), and the digital FX are way better than in THE FLASH. This had a big budget for a horror movie, but less than half what it cost for THE FLASH, and I suspect the difference is that the studio messed with him less so he had more time to get the visuals right. Even without the computers, Skarsgård continues his reign as one of his generation’s greats, doing a crazy voice, dancing around, working well under makeup, twisting his face around. I think we could compare it to Robert Englund as Freddy (who was also aided by imaginative special effects teams), though it honestly seems like more work.

Tonally it’s of-putting – Richie, being a comedian, is almost always “on,” and there are some funny ideas like when a little boy comes up to him and says “The fun is just beginning” but turns out not to be a creepy boy, just a fan quoting his act to him. I think Hader has the dark humor and dramatic chops to make it a great scene, but they have him play it broad like a Will Ferrel movie. Seems like a waste.

I did laugh at this joke though:

I thought I had turned around on McAvoy after being impressed by him in SPLIT and SPEAK NO EVIL, but I realize now I just like him when he’s playing crazy dudes. When he’s supposed to be the relatable hero he doesn’t click for me. I found myself laughing at his crazed reactions, especially when he grabs a neighborhood kid (Luke Roessler, DEADPOOL 2) and yells in his face that he has to leave town.


This is a little boy, dude, he is not gonna take up the initiative to move. That’s not how things work. How do you write books if you don’t know the most basic shit about human living? I’m guessing you suck at more than endings. And then he spends a bunch of the movie riding around town on an antique (honestly before his time) child’s bicycle. I think we’re supposed to take him as a regular guy relatably losing his shit under evil-cosmic-spider-clown pressure, but he would need a whole lot more regular guy charisma to pull that off. Man, you’re stressing me out, Bill. I bet Peter Bogdanovich set this all up just to get rid of you. And no jury in America would ever convict him.

After all these hours of IT they just beat Pennywise by (spoiler for the movie IT CHAPTER TWO) kinda how Nancy (tentatively) beat Freddy – by not being scared of him. But in this case also just being hurtful. Mostly they yell “You’re a clown!,” but also “You’re a mimic!” Seems like that one is supposed to cut deep, somehow. The scene is pretty laughable but somewhat rescued by how cool it looks when Pennywise turns small and sad and flat and then they pull out his heart and all smoosh it together while he watches. Yeah, I guess it’s a pretty cool ending. (Then there’s ten more minutes, including the house collapsing and Bill and Beverly kissing underwater and an epilogue where, thank God, Mike gets to move.)

This is crazy but IT was such a big deal that this sequel, which I haven’t personally heard of anyone liking, made $473.1 million in theaters. That’s more than $100 million more than SINNERS, and on a lower budget. I bring that up partly as reminder #4080 that box office is kind of a silly thing to dwell on since we’re not getting a cut, but mainly as trivia because I was surprised to read that. I guess they didn’t need me to get around to seeing it after all.

This entry was posted on Monday, October 27th, 2025 at 7:18 am and is filed under Reviews, Horror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

14 Responses to “It Chapter Two”

  1. I’m baffled by how bad the two new IT movies were. They had so much money and then got two long movies to build a rich story that would use all the awesome production values and creepy imagery to build on the theme, which you made very clear, is about how small-town small-mindedness is an evil. That is so relevant in today’s America. Instead, they were like let’s just do a bunch of jump scares. The bummer is that “they” were right as they still made a ton of cash.

  2. I watched IT Chapter 2 years ago at this point. I watched it late at night, and I think I occasionally fell asleep for five minutes at a time. Usually, that just means I’m tired and isn’t a reflection of the movie, but here the film just sort of meanders, so maybe it bears some fault.

    Way back when the first film came out, the idea of splitting the novel into two parts seemed logical. But I went ahead and read the book before seeing the movie, and it became clear why that’s not the best approach. The spine of the novel is the story of these misfits finding each other in a small Maine town. Their adult counterparts are mostly there as contrast with their younger selves and to serve as a way to definitively destroy Pennywise. Without the presence of the earlier narrative, they don’t serve much of a purpose.

    If you split the narrative, you kind of destroy that tinge of nostalgia and feelings of regret that’s integral to the story. They try to get around this with new scenes of the kids, but it’s not enough.

    I also question the decision to move the story up a couple of decades. King is an uneven writer, but he is arguably one of the most important creative voices in baby boomer literature. I understand why they did this. Stranger Things was red hot at the time. But this is fundamentally a baby boomer story, and I don’t think they need to update it for gen X.

  3. Honestly, I was surprised how hated that one was. But at the same time I was surprised how beloved the first was! They both have more or less the same strengths and problems. The main problem in both movies is that Pennywise doesn’t seem scary enough. He comes across like a Tim Burton villain. Compare that to Tim Curry’s version, who is even today still nightmare fuel, even when he looks like a normal, happy clown, without the “Why hell is that kid not running away? Skarsgardwise looks like a monster all the time!?” look of the new version.

    And that 99% of the scares are of the cheap jumpy kind, isn’t helping either, even if I admit that some of them have a great buildup. But you can have a clown or a zombie looking thingy run straight at the camera only so many times before it’s not even remotely scary anymore.

    I admit to not being bothered by the runtime at all and thought that the movie just zipped by fast, although I did find it weird that it runs almost as long as the full TV miniseries. That said, even if I am mostly indifferent about this big screen version of IT, I still would watch the long announced one-movie cut, if Muschietti ever gets around to putting that one out.

  4. I rewatched the first one recently after only seeing it when it came out. I remember thinking it was a strong B+ that wiffed a few moments, that it maybe didn’t congeal all the way to being equal to the sum of its parts (and some parts were GREAT), and that it suffered a huge horror-movie problem I thought we’d all solved as a society when too many scenes feature the monster NOT killing the kids even though he totally could. It just makes him less scary and drowns the stakes.

    But watching the first part again, I bumped it down to like a C. It’s fine. It’s not great. I do think the second part is almost unwatchable, as its SO long and meanders SO much and is just laughably written. I remember the hype around it pre-release and the deflation feeling like MATRIX: RELOADED level “Wow, they really fucked it up, didn’t they?” But the first part wasn’t actually that great to begin with.

    I think this story’s just really hard to tell if you stick too close to the book. Like most Stephen King things, it’s better if the filmmakers just do their own thing with the BASIC idea. Keep the best moments and focus your movie on the stuff YOU care about, don’t try and keep it all. It never really works.

  5. Yeah, I remember enjoying the first movie, but I also didn’t understand people who were going crazy over it. The tricky thing with adapting It is that there are too many characters. Aren’t there like seven kids? That’s too many kids! They probably could have killed off a few, and it would have been unexpected and shocking, even for people who have read the book. It would have saved them money on casting the adults, so the studio would have liked it as well.

  6. Man, what a fuckin’ dog this one is. Like others have diagnosed, the problem starts with the splitting up of the two parallel timelines into separate movies. The adult timeline is really just a framing device for the characters to remember the childhood trauma they’d forgotten. In the book, they’re still remembering how it went down the first time right up to the end. If you tell the entire kid story in the first movie, that not only leaves the second movie with very little in the way of incident, but you now have a story about a bunch of characters figuring out stuff we, the audience, already know. There’s really no recovering from that. All you can do is what they did: add in a bunch of random jump scares and inconsequential flashbacks to fill out the running time until the big confrontation. Why the fuck that filler had to be nearly three goddamn hours long is beyond me.

    Still, you could make an entertaining movie just out of the loose ends of the IT-verse, but you’d need better casting, acting, writing, and directing than what we see here. All the established actors except Bill Hader are giving career-worst performances, and the lesser-known actors just disappear right off the screen. The scare sequences are largely mechanical and redundant, and the climax is laughable. They defeat Pennywise like he’s a schoolyard bully in an AIR BUD movie or something. I don’t know how you’d translate the mystical coke-addled psychedelia of the novel’s finale into cinema, but I’m not the one who decided IT needed to be a movie. You don’t know how to do the job, don’t take it.

    At least give us a turtle. This movie is fucking bullshIT.

  7. I really did not see what all the fuss was about part 1, and I pretty aggressively hated on it. Then when part 2 came out, it was such a ridiculous mess but with a lot of fun creature moments that I kind of liked it in the same way I like a late-period NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET flick. It’s not good, but I liked the unhinged self-indulgence of all the Pennywise stuff.

  8. IT2 kind of feels like what happened with the PSYCHO remake compared to the original in that IT1 wasn’t a bad film (uneven but it works – helped by every kid cast member giving a winning performance and a more restrained, simpler version of Pennywise) and then the film essentially is remade for part 2 and it’s a complete flop. You can literally make a shot for shot remake and still not capture anything that worked in one version to the next. Just to clarify I’m also not saying that IT1 is as good as the original PSYCHO. I’m not super knowledgeable of a lot of the adult cast. but the one I’m especially a fan of, Chastain gives a notable terrible performance – yikes. Hader gives the only ‘passable’ performance, and it’s still not that good, it’s just better because of all the bad ones he’s surrounded by. And Pennywise is just to over the top – he would be more at home as a bad guy in and AVENGERS movie.

    Book wise – I still remember buying the original hardcover of the novel when it was published in September 1986. Holding it was exhilarating but intimidating – it was a huge brick of a book, what was I getting myself into? And there are entire sections of it still burned into my mind nearly 40 years later. In particular one section where Ben is tormented and chased by spirits and monsters on a stormy night was freaky because it was a cold, stormy early fall night when I was reading the book, the wind and rain pounding on the window in my bedroom. It was really fucking scary. I gulped the entire book book from Friday at about 4pm after I get home from buying it – reading right through the weekend ’til 4am Monday morning before school. At the time it really seemed like King was laying down his magnum opus – a summation of both his literary output up to then and an encapsulation of the entire horror genre. Still got the original hardcover 1st edition sitting on the shelf with every other 1st edition HC of all his novels, and I’m still reading him 40 years later.

    I started rereading Kings books in order of original publication at the start of the this year (Carrie, Salem’s Lot, The Shining, Rage & Night Shift completed.) Not sure how deeply I’ll go, certainly into the mid to late 1980s around the time of It in 1986. One thing that is so apparent and is still so true of his writing is his, I think in English writing unsurpassed ability to sketch a character in near totality in a page or two in a novel or a paragraph in a short story. It’s just as good in a short story from 1970 like Graveyard Shift published in a now long forgotten ‘adult’ magazine as in an instant #1 bestseller published today. He’s as good at that as any writer in the world in the last 50 years.

    And for me the miniseries/tv film is the best filmed version. Tim Curry is tremendous as the creepy Pennywise, and it’s all down to performance. It’s still not an all together ‘great’ film, but I think it works because of its earnestness.

  9. IT was a super fun time in the theater with a crowd.

    IT HARDER was a good movie to watch for 20 minutes on a plane and then turn it off.

  10. BTW, I do think that the TV version still holds up. Well, “holds up”.

    When it came out, it seemed like the scariest shit ever with a healthy dose of “Holy shit, THIS is allowed on network TV now?!” and now it mostly works like an old black & white horror movie, that might not scare you out of your mind, but you can admire the atmosphere, how groundbreaking certain things were for its time (I don’t know how the timeline works out since they both debuted the same year, but I feel like without TWIN PEAKS, it would’ve been much cheesier and TV-looking), the acting (As mentioned before: Tim Fucking Curry who both nails the “Hi kid, I’m a nice little clown” and the “I’M A FUCKING MONSTER!” part without even wearing different make up), but the rest of the adult and kids cast is really good too.) and most of all the story. Especially when you watch it in an uninterrupted three hour sitting, it doesn’t matter that the adult part isn’t as good as the kid part or even that it isn’t the most faithful adaptation of the book, because it really feels like watching an epic story about true friendship, wrapped around a still pretty unique horror plot.

  11. CJ it’s funny that you mention the tv miniseries alongside Twin Peaks because those are the two things that after we watched them, my mom made me walk around the house with her while she closed and locked all the windows.

  12. For all of you turtle freaks out there, the miniseries Welcome to Derry seemingly goes out of its way to throw turtles at you in the first episode. There’s little else to recommend it.

  13. Distinct memory of coming out the cinema completely raging.

    Loved the first – haven’t revisited it since this released as it just made it completely redundant.

    Makes me gutted that we never got Cary Fukunaga’s original pitch for the series. In hindsight, I think IT 1 works largely cos of his foundations (and an amazing performance from Bill).

    Also despised the smug digs at Stephen King’s endings in the cameo. Undignified – and also just a bit silly when the new ending you’ve come up with is so lame. It is also (in exactly the same category of Batfleck in the Flash getting lassoed and talking about how he could spend his money better on antipoverty schemes) one of those examples of just picking up tweets and internet cliches and dropping them into your script, which in my view is, again, lame.

    This + Flash have made Andy look like the biggest hack in the game.

  14. Exactly. I couldn’t understand the raves the first movie got, because it threw away anything interesting from the book and reduced the story to: scary clown goes “boo” at a kid, kid runs away, repeat for two hours.

    Then this one came out and everyone was like “Oh it’s so terrible” and I was even more baffled, like: what did you expect? The previous movie was terrible, you all made it a big hit, and so they gave you a second helping of awfulness. Same thing with THOR: LOVE & THUNDER (another movie I refused to see after hating the previous installment).

    The world of cinema would be a better place if people would just agree with me about what movies are bad at the time they come out instead of figuring it out later. That way we would be spared terrible sequels.

    Andy Muschietti IS the biggest hack in the game. They should stop giving him movies IMO.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>