tn_criminalCRIMINAL is way too generic a title for this distinctive Kevin Costner action thriller, another enjoyable under-the-radar, higher-minded-than-advertised b-movie to put on the shelf next to 3 DAYS TO KILL. Costner would be the criminal of the title, a gruff, uneducated death row inmate with the strong action movie name of Jericho Stewart. He’s said to have some kind of condition that leaves him no capacity for empathy, like that creepy kid in MALEVOLENCE and BEREAVEMENT, so he experiences what the internet calls “the feels” for the first time when he’s the subject of an experimental surgery that implants another man’s memories into his brain.

I couldn’t help but think of FACE/OFF. Not that it has any of John Woo’s heightened filmatism or outlandish action – the tone, grounded world and love of intelligence agency war rooms are closer to a BOURNE movie – but that’s the only other movie I can think of that uses a sci-fi gimmick in a non-futuristic world and then puts an emphasis on exploring its emotional consequences.

The story starts with Bill Pope, not the cinematographer of THE MATRIX, but a CIA agent on the run in London, played by an uncredited Ryan Reynolds (BLADE TRINITY). He’s in the middle of a mission gone south – something about Spanish anarchists and a hacker and a buy, and people chasing him around town trying to trap him. When he ends up dead, CIA director Quaker Wells (Gary Oldman sporting another action movie name that’s not messing around) is desperate to find out what Pope was working on, because he was the only one getting close to a hacker (blackhat?) who may be able to remotely control military weapons. So Wells – actually, can I call him Quaker? – Quaker turns to this guy Dr. Franks (Tommy Lee Jones, UNDER SIEGE) who has been developing this memory-implanting theory for years.

Quaker is basically using Jericho’s brain as hardware. He wants to plug in Pope’s memories like a flashdrive so he can read it and find out… well, where an actual flashdrive is. Jericho sees flashes of important things: a bag of money Pope was going to pay off the hacker with, some locations that might lead to it, Pope’s wife (Gal Gadot, FAST FIVE) and daughter (Lara Decaro). But instead of telling Quaker what he sees he uses his instant CIA skills to escape captivity and go looking for the money he sort of remembers.

Whoops. This is why this was a dangerous idea. Now there’s a multiple-murderer on the loose, loaded with fresh new talents. On the positive side, he’s learning about this whole emotion thing through the weird attachment he’s feeling to the dead guy’s wife and kid. But he’s a psycho, so what he decides to do is go to the house and tie the wife up.

mp_criminalHe can’t hurt her, so he doesn’t, but this guy is real unwieldy. That could make him a good bad guy. It makes him a better protagonist. You’re not sure whether to be afraid of him or root for him to learn how to be nice. His unpredictability had me hooked.

Costner is challenging himself with a role that’s not necessarily how people want to see him. The only problem with it is our own limits in accepting him playing different roles. Jericho reminds me of burnouts I’ve known: a belligerent, socially inept redneck who mumbles and grunts and doesn’t notice or care that he’s always interrupting and disrupting everywhere he goes. For example he’s completely unfamiliar with the concept of waiting in line, which is demonstrated most explicitly when he walks into a coffee shop and is surprised to find that he knows the name of the barista and can order in French (which he thinks is Spanish). An uptight dude is (completely justifiably) annoyed that Jericho barged in front of him, and ends up getting punched over it. The victim’s prissiness hints that this is a comedic scene, but I think it rides a good line between entertaining chaos and disconcerting recklessness.

The poor widow, Jill Pope, figures out that something weird is going on here, and then we get a scene I definitely think is inspired by one of the best scenes in FACE/OFF, the one where Nic Cage has to get Joan Allen to understand that he’s her husband wearing the face of the man who killed their kid. It’s a wrenchingly emotional situation coming out of a preposterous premise. Here it’s a matter of Jericho sort of begrudgingly explaining to her that he has these memories belonging to her husband. She looks at him with deep love, her eyes full of tears, happy to be able to have this little leftover scrap of her husband’s spirit, something he’s clearly very uncomfortable with. If you can buy it – and I could – it’s beautifully bittersweet.

The only other comparable scene I can think of is near the end of SEVEN POUNDS, when (spoiler) Rosario Dawson is looking deep into the eyes of her dead love in somebody else’s head. For me the combination of outlandishness and fierce sincerity completely works, though I figure most people consider all these scenes laughably ridiculous. Their loss in my opinion.

In CRIMINAL’s case the scene makes the whole movie worth it for Gal Gadot, who is otherwise kinda stuck in the put-upon-loving-wife-that-has-to-cry-all-the-time role. She’s good all the way through, but that one scene shows her skills far beyond what I previously realized.

Jones also runs away with his small role. We’re used to that blustering TLJ, but this is the quiet one. He was pushed into doing this questionable experiment, and he wants to do the right thing by his patient, and keeps trying to. I don’t think I’ve ever seen his eyes do so many sad, sympathetic looks in one movie. Definitely not in a supporting role.

The thing that put the movie on my radar is the one aspect that you should not have any hopes for: Scott Adkins. He plays a CIA agent who is there throughout, but I think he only has one scene where he says anything, and he doesn’t do a single kick or punch. The closest he does to action is the ol’ agent-scurrying-through-crowded-airport-looking-for-suspect, which Oldman is also doing at the same time, so it certainly didn’t require a master of martial arts who’s mainly known for smashing two different faces in one flying kick. Because he can actually do that kind of stuff obviously he has a credible physical presence for playing an agent standing around looking intensely at computer screens and listening to instructions. But because they’re not dealing with amateurs here and we’re familiar with his work they are potentially setting us up for a disappointment. We see Scott Adkins, we expect at least a little Scott Adkins shit.

But I’m sure it was a good acting exercise for him to work with all those guys, and they don’t show him on the cover as if he’s gonna get alot to do. Anyway, you’ve been warned. It’s not a Scott Adkins movie, it’s a movie that Scott Adkins happens to be in the background of. But it’s a good Kevin Costner movie.

p.s. If you’ve ever wondered how prevalent super hero movies have become, just take a look at this cast. You have actors who have played Pa Kent, Commissioner Gordon, Two Face, Wonder Woman, Deadpool, Weapon XI and Faora-Ul, plus some guy that was in ANT-MAN.

p.p.s. There must’ve been a very different cast planned for this at one point since they thank Zach Braff, Gerard Butler, Scott Eastwood and Mel Gibson at the end of the credits.

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 28th, 2016 at 10:55 am and is filed under Action, Reviews, Science Fiction and Space Shit. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

36 Responses to “Criminal”

  1. It’s to your credit that you’ve forgotten Green Lantern.

    I’ve not seen this, but I’m heartened that you liked it. It’d be cool if more people did want to see Costner do this kind of stuff, as it seems he’s pretty good at it, but I fear we will be getting more of inspirational coach Costner.

  2. This was the first Besson joint that I’ve missed in the theater in years, and I’m bummed about it. Especially since I really like post-humbling Kevin Costner in gruff low-key man of action mode. He seems like a guy who’s seen some shit and done even more shit and is maybe two steps away from being irredeemable but he’s not quite there yet. The premise also seemed like just the kind of almost-impossible-to-play-straight-but-we’re-giving-it-a-go-anyway ridiculousness that Besson thrives on. I feel bad about not supporting it at the theater, since these movies seem to be made for me and possibly Vern and that’s about it. I liked TRANSPORTER 4, for christ’s sake. I feel like I let the team down.

  3. I reviewed on this my podcast a while back and it was one of the sweetest surprises of the year so far. Gadot and Costner are so great in their scenes together and it deftly balances an unwieldy combo of pathos, brutal violence and dark comedy. And it’s super genuine in its intentions and executions. It’s the kind of movie that if I saw it while flipping through cable, I would stop and watch the whole thing. Also, great score.

  4. Huh. Turns out this wasn’t a Besson joint at all. I don’t know how I got that idea. I guess I just assumed. It seems like the kind of movie only he would a) make, and b) be able to get into theaters. Glad to know someone else is picking up the weird conceptual action slack.

  5. Ha, I was prepared to believe you, because it would make sense for him to make one like this. But it’s the Lerners, the Millennium guys.

  6. I thought of Face/Off too. It was Mind/Off, only we didn’t get to see Ryan Reynolds walking around with a criminal brain. We did, however, get to see Ryan Reynolds with his skull cracked open and electrodes hooked up to his brain, which I assume is the equivalent of Nicolas Cage waking up without a face and saying, “But it’s cool.”

    I’m glad Millennium hooked Adkins up with some work in between his starring vehicles. If you do want to see Scott Adkins being Scott Adkins in a big movie, I recommend The Brothers Grimsby. Way funnier than I expected and Adkins has two fight scenes, one against Sacha Baron Cohen for comedic purposes, but Adkins is doing real moves. There’s also a line from Cohen at Adkins’ expense that’s hilarious.

  7. Dammit! When this was in theaters I really wanted to go see a movie one day, but it was slim pickings. I considered this one, but when I saw it got such bad/bland reviews, especially with such a big, well known cast, I got suckered into believing them and didn’t go see it. You know better, Maggie. You know not to listen to reviewers. Present company excluded, of course.

  8. Fred- you mean “ukrainian Ben Affleck” I assume.

  9. That’s the one, Shoot!

  10. I will also chime in on the greatness of The Brothers Grimsby. The decision to let Louis Leterrier direct was brilliant. Only a guy like that could sell action sequences with gross-out nonsense and serve it with a straight face and get away with it.

    Likewise, Criminal is sheer stupidity served up with undying sincerity and it just works. Costner gives his best performance since 3000 Miles to Graceland (which is really saying something) and delivers lines like “faster the fuck up” in a hilarious fashion. I can’t say it’s one of the best movies of the year but damn if it isn’t more fun than a lot of the summer blockbusters this year.

  11. I thought Cos was pretty great in Mr Brooks too. He seems to be better at playing against type than his typecast as lovable everyman.

  12. Yeah, I kinda liked this one. Although it does too easily forgive Costner for doing some pretty bad stuff. But I’ll take the scrappy and weird (and R-rated) over the more polished yet bland pretty much every day of the week. I saw this months ago and it left a stronger impression on me then Star Trek Beyond did, and I saw that only yesterday.

    re: underused Atkins. Alice Eve has her friggin name on the poster (fourth billed) and has maybe five lines of dialog. Not even a single close up shot of her. Its a clear ‘pay somebody well to use them in the marketing’ role like they did for the also nigh invisible yet well credited part Melissa Leo had in London Has Fallen.

  13. Best performance since 3000 Miles to Graceland sounds like an insult.

  14. The Undefeated Gaul

    August 1st, 2016 at 1:51 am

    I liked this one more than expected, but I still kept wishing throughout they’d just gone ahead and went full action with it. Action felt like the ingredient that would’ve tied the whole thing together, but instead they kept taking turns AWAY from what would’ve been satisfying action moments. Case in point (MINOR SPOILER): Costner missing the villain with his axe throw at the end, only to have the guy being blown up by his own drone a second later. An axe in the face, now that’s a juicy, satisfying villain death that could’ve made me forgive the director for lazily casting Jordi Molla as the villain (playing the same damn role he’s done a thousand times already, see also BAD BOYS 2, KNIGHT & DAY, COLOMBIANA). Sadly, obviously the director was trying to make a different (less entertaining) sort of film…

    One other thing I wanted to mention: they have a character named The Dutchman, then give him a sort of vague Eastern-European accent and have him mispronounce his own name (he says Stroop like “poop,” while in Dutch it would’ve been pronounced like “pope”). I guess at least it’s better than those Dutch criminals in ASSASSINS that actively spoke German to each other…

  15. Let’s not forget about BASTILLE DAY. That’s TWO movies this year that feel like they’ve got Besson’s fingerprints all over them but don’t.

  16. I watched that Bastille Day trailer and they have all these action beats but I bet you it has like two action scenes and they’re short and terribly done.

  17. It has quite a few action scenes actually. Including a long rooftop footchase with Idris Elba.

  18. And not to mention a surprisingly funky theme song (with Elba himself on the Mic, produced by Norman “Fatboy Slim” Cook)

    Norman Cook & Idris Elba - The Road Less Travelled

    Norman Cook & Idris Elba - The Road Less Travelled

    Taken from the motion picture "Bastille Day"

  19. I just watched THE ICEMAN from this same non-Besson director.

    Its pretty good. One of those movies with great performances but overall I’m somewhat indifferent to. One thing that really impressed me though, was its a true story of the mob that did not feel like THE GODFATHER or GOODFELLAS. Sure, there was some overlap in the general mob double crossing shit, the clothes and accents and definetly some of the actors. But look ,style, music,and the overall tone was much different. This movie had its own thing going on.

    It while it wasn’t exactly my thing…it was its own thing, which is cool. I look very forward to checking out CRIMINAL…if that’s its own thing in a pretty established genre, that’s totally cool too.

  20. Loved this one. A really cool, unexpected gem.

    The electro music score is great, and the whole thing had a Michael Mann thing going on. The only thing I didn’t like was the monochrome green look, but hey…beggars can’t be choosers!

    One movie it really reminded me of that hasn’t been mentioned is THE HIDDEN. Its not that there’s something in the bad guys brain aspect, its more Costner’s need it NOW approach to life. Seen most in the chicken sandwich place and the coffee shop. Both pretty unique scenes, that I think are only similar to THE HIDDEN’s “I want a car” and everything else he wants..

    Wish Adkins had more to do. Through the whole thing I was like “There’s going to be an action scene with this guy”, maybe a quick fight with that T3 esque assassin girl while Costner was taking on bigger bad guys, but nope. He does run up some stairs or something though.

    Anyway, a good one, and really unfairly overlooked. Hope its got a cult audience brewing.

  21. Mild Spoiler

    I thoroughly enjoyed this. Top notch cast. Kevin Costner has a lot of fun with with the role, and I really enjoyed this this performance, the way it presses into his redneck psychopathy, even after we’re supposed to be rooting for him. Jericho Stewart is a first-rate bad-ass. There are some gnarly beatings. Some nice feel-good moments (I’m a sucker for that stuff). Plus, Gal Gadot, though. I could spend two hours just watching her look earnestly into my Jericho-Ryan-Reynolds-first-person camera eyes and say poignant things (intelligible or otherwise) Faith in 2016 Tommy Lee Jones restored, check. Good to see Gary Oldman dusting off his Commissioner Gordon and taking it for a spin-off, as well (lol).

    Only questionable element for me was Heimdahl, whom I thought was a pretty weak sauce literature professor-looking second-rate villain with a second-rate Scarlet Widow of a #2. At least she gets a fitting send-off.

    Very solid film.

  22. This has given me greater respect for Costner as a screen presence and late-in-life ass-kicker. His Jericho is monolithic, but beautifully sympathetic the way Costner plays him. Vern and others mentioned FACE/OFF, and THE HIDDEN, as influences, and rightly so (the nose-touching “I love you” signal I took as an homage to Cage and Travolta’s face-fingering, as well as Molla’s plane being taken down as a nod to Woo’s runway scene in FACE/OFF – a coincidence maybe, but I’ll go with it). I will also add FRANKENSTEIN to the mix. Jericho is an emotionless monster with holes in his head (much gorier here), who is given someone else’s soul in an experiment by Dr Frank(enstein), and learns what it’s like to have FEELINGS.

    I’ll throw in a bra-fucking-vo for CRIMINAL recalling I KNOW WHO KILLED ME, with it’s memory/identity crises, in a way that makes me love that movie even more.

    The creative violence in this is hilariously great. Jericho makes a coat-hanger hook from a piece of interior car-panel (with his goddamn mouth, while handcuffed – fuck you Macgyver), then rips a guys throat out with it, king-hits multiple persons, bludgeons with lampstands, gets his leg cut by broken glass escaping from a car underwater (while still handcuffed – fuck you Macgyver AND Bourne), casually runs his vehicle into people at top speed, swings a hatchet like Chingachgook and Hawkeye, and gets shot several times yet keeps getting up.

    I love this guy, and I love this movie.

  23. Poeface, you capture the sheer joy of watching this far better than I could, but I echo your sentiments. I have never been a huge Costner fan, but I’m with Majestyk: I dig post-humbling Costner. This, Open Range, and Mr. Brooks are all really solid films, and I like the way Costner is branching out, slow and steady. Jericho is a bad-ass for the ages.

  24. Hey, thanks Skani, for the compliment. I agree with MR BROOKS and OPEN RANGE being on Costner’s upswing (metaphor in upcoming reference), and I also liked him as the drunken ex-baseballer neighbor in THE UPSIDE OF ANGER, which recalled his earlier successes on the pitch (home-run, for FIELD OF DREAMS and BULL DURHAM). I would dare any sorry motherfucker to attempt a defense of his ROBIN HOOD (Alan Rickman being it’s only redeeming feature – it ends with a fucking Bryan Adams song for gods sake).

    However, I thought he was absolutely perfect as Jonathan Kent, and lent a real emotional weight to MAN OF STEEL. As a post-humbled supporting actor in MOS and UPSIDE, he was excellent.

  25. Yeah, MOS was pretty much perfectly cast.

  26. Don’t judge me, but last night I got the urge to revisit THE BODYGUARD, and I sort of liked it a whole lot more than when I used to think it was just studio fluff. Call it curiosity about Costner’s shaky 90’s output as opposed to his current status in my eyes as a solid and weathered leading man with real gravitas. It certainly is not much more than studio fluff in terms of style, with it’s soft-focus lens telling us this is A Love Story, and with the purpose of putting Whitney Houston in a big movie.

    But I liked a few things about it – Costner’s Frank Farmer, ex Secret Service guy who now Bodyguards and lives by a no-nonsense code. He enters Whitney’s world and takes charge like a boss. Recruits the black chauffeur to be his wing-man. Haunted by guilt for having the day off work when Reagan was shot (like Clint with JFK a year later in IN THE LINE OF FIRE). Costner gives an understated performance. He and Houston have good chemistry, though her character Rachel is too close to Whitney’s real-life working class diva for me to really like.

    And I…E…I, may not always love this movie, but I enjoyed revisiting it.

  27. I most only remember the part where he casually beats up that other bodyguard in the kitchen. But that’s a pretty good part.

  28. Poeface- you should have gone with the excuse that you thought you´d be watching THE BODYGUARD with Sonny Chiba, instead of the explanation of some sudden, inexplicable “urge”. Only women are that impulsive, and your mandom is now in jeopardy! Please don´t tell me you like the WHitney Hoston song at least!!

  29. I fucking LOVE that song!

  30. So I fucked up with the Sonny Chiba reference, but I at least mentioned Clint in my comments….

    And that kitchen fight Majestyk, is with the great Mike Starr!

  31. Poeface: Don’t be too embarrased, after watching MR. BROOKS, 3 DAYS TO KILL, and CRIMINAL I got the ‘urge’ to go back and re-watch all of Costner’s filmography. So even though I’m not planning on watching MESSAGE IN A BOTTLE, the completest part of me knows it is now inevitable.

  32. Thanks geoffrey, good to know. I’ll probly be skipping what was Sam Raimi’s least proud moment though, FOR LOVE OF THE GAME, which I often referred to as FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!, due to how insipid the whole affair was. But I’ll rate TIN CUP as one I’d like to revisit.

  33. Don´t foret to rewatch REVENGE. You´ll get some of your manhood back.

  34. So, uh, anyone else see Self/Less, the Ryan Reynolds/Tarsem sci-fi actioner that feels like the same movie as this? They’re both lower budget Face/Off-style sci-fi action movies that bombed at the boxoffice – Self/Less has Ben Kingsley transferring his mind into Ryan Reynolds while Criminal involves Ryan Reynolds transferring his mind into Kevin Costner. And I’m pretty sure Reynolds has an endangered wife and a young daughter in both so I’m trying to figure out if there’s a possibility one’s a sequel to the other or there’s a shared universe thing going on. (Self/Less is also packed with comic-book actors as well, with Watchmen’s Matthew Goode, and Iron Man 3’s Kingsley. Even henchman Derek Luke was one of the Howling Commandos in Captain America 1 now I think about it)

    Anyway, Criminal isn’t the greatest movie but it does have enough interesting touches to keep it from being entirely forgettable. Mainly of the completely amoral variety – *SPOILERS* Costner is such an asshole that I can’t believe he didn’t die. I mean, at first you’re not sure if he’s just a lovable scoundrel but nope, his first act is to slit a government agent’s throat and then kill an innocent motorist. He possibly beats some dude to death with a helmet, and the movie weirdly calls attention to an exploding cop car at the end and stresses that the cops inside definitely died due to him. And he still doesn’t die!

    Or does he? I’m not sure if the ending hints that he’s actually 100% Ryan Reynolds now (which I don’t think was really mentioned as a possibility), or if he’s still evil Kevin Costner playing at being Ryan Reynolds or what. I guess you’re not supposed to know despite the feel-good triumphant music? Anyways, it’s a good concept and I’m glad somebody’s still making R-rated non-comic book action movies, even though apparently nobody bothers to see them.

  35. Haven’t seen SELFLESS, neal, but that could explain why Reynolds isn’t credited on CRIMINAL. More of a let’s hope nobody notices type of deal. But shit, its Ryan Omnipresent Reynolds. Even my Canadian buddy Dirty Dave is facebook friends with Ryan.

    And I believe Jericho only throws the helmet. He does knock a guy out with a picnic cooler, though…

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>