"I take orders from the Octoboss."

Blade: Trinity

Man I tell you, I wish it was possible for lightning to strike 3 times in the same spot. It would be useful for many things including meteorological research and movie trilogies. But it’s not possible. Never happened. Not once. Only once has it hit the same exact place twice. And that place was the exact spot where Blade was standing at the time. Both times.

What I’m saying obviously is that BLADE III – and I will not call it BLADE TRINITY because what the hell kind of name for Blade III is BLADE TRINITY – is no BLADE or BLADE II. And there are many reasons why. The most immediate thing you notice: it just doesn’t look as good. Steve Norrington and Guillermo Del Toro were both so careful and artful. BLADE felt so exact and carefully composed, II was so spooky atmospheric with shiny gold tinted edges. III (directed by the guy Dave Goyer who wrote all the other ones but only directed the small indy drama ZIG ZAG) tries hard to imitate some of both of those looks. It has the same cinematagraphist as the last one, and I mean it’s not an ugly movie. But you can tell it’s not quite real. Not it’s own look, not quite capturing the previous looks. I think I read this was more expensive than the others but to me it feels cheaper. Almost like a really damn impressive TV version of the Blade universe. But not quite the real Blade universe.

And then you notice the villains. Parker Posey is real cool as a bitchy vampire ex-girlfriend of a young wisecracking white dude who saves Blade from the FBI (long story). But her crew are just not up to BLADE standards. In the first one the vampires were all exotic and interesting looking, plus Donal Logue. The second one raised the bar, making the villains weirder, scarier and more sympathetic. Here you just got a couple cheeseballs, one of them a big wrestler guy with bad hair. Like Tyler Mane in X-MAN but not as appealing. They work out of some fancy hipster office building, like they are the well paid staff of some smarmy vampire magazine. I don’t really understand what they are doing there, but there are lots of good catwalks to tumble from and windows to break through.

Blade: TrinityThe lead villain is Dracula, the first vampire, dug up from a Pyramid in the Syrian desert (nobody checked there before). He’s a morphing monster version of Dracula with an ancient warrior type human form. You know, some bland muscle guy with a necklace and armor on one arm. He looks like he could be some guy from Hercules or Xena. From some angles he actually looks a little bit like Bela Lugosi, but other than that it’s a strike out. Not much in the way of charisma or presence. Again, seems like TV. Good TV, but still TV. And we’re not in the TV business here, Goyer. This is the silver fucking screen. If you can’t take the heat get out of the boiler room.

I guess the problem is, this seems like the BLADE II you would’ve thought they would’ve made, before they made BLADE II and surpassed all our expectations. One of the reasons why BLADE II is such a god damn masterpiece is because it captured most of what was great about the original but put the characters in a whole different situation. The first one he’s running a three person operation underground in a city, fighting against a vampire masterplan. So what do you do for the second one, you transport him across the planet to Europe, where he has to side with a team of highly trained vampire soldiers to fight off a new more monstrous mutant type of vampire. That’s a totally different story and it doesn’t even take place in the human world at all – almost every character in the movie is a vampire.

So shit, where do you go from there? How do you make it exciting after that? Well Goyer came up with a pretty brilliant idea, which was to skip forward 15 years to an apocalyptic future world where the vampires have won. The world is entirely run by vampires, and Blade is the lone rebel fighting back, like Omega Man or Planet of the Apes or The Ten Commandments. (Well, maybe not The Ten Commandments. I haven’t seen that one in a long time.)

The only problem is, Goyer didn’t use this brilliant idea, he just talked about it in magazines and instead went with a less risky brilliant idea: to put Blade back in the human world and have him outed. In the human world people don’t know about vampires, so what are they gonna think about this weirdo in the leather jacket who carries a sword, walks around in broad daylight shooting at people, even beats and murders cops who secretly work with the vampires? Well it turns out the FBI have been after him because he’s left a pretty long and windy trail of non-vampire corpses. This is great turning Blade into an outlaw, making him fight against the authorities and not just the vampires. And it’s very exciting when he gets captured and interogated and even checked out by a psychiatrist who makes the mistake of asking him about his relationship with his mother. (And the whole theater went, “Oooooooooohhh!”)

This is great, right? A great way to spin the series in a completely different direction? Yeah, for about 5 minutes, but then you find out all the cops and the psychiatrist and everybody are actually the familiars, the vampire’s bitches, and we’re back to square one. He’s just fighting vampires again. The completely new direction was a false alarm. (Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate this subversive/uncomfortably realistic theme in the BLADE pictures that authority figures are lackeys to the bloodsuckers. I just think after BLADE II you got no choice but to try to raise the bar even higher.)

Then Blade teams up with these kids called the Nightstalkers, which is mainly Hannibal King (aforementioned white dude who saved him) and Whistler’s “out of wedlock” daughter Abigail (who I would say is from the remake of TEXAS CHAIN SAW MASSACRE but fortunately that møvie does not exist and will never be thought of or mentioned again). And that’s fun but I seem to remember an elite team of special ops vampires called The Blood Pack who he teamed up with last time, and they were more interesting as characters and as a storyline because of the tension and because they turned on him, etc. The Nightstalkers as backup was Whistler’s plan, and then they convince Blade to follow their plan for stopping the vampire menace once and for all. That’s great but what about one thing, what about Blade’s plan? It’s Blade that executes their plan and kick’s Dracula’s ass, but I couldn’t help but think that this movie is not giving Blade enough credit. Blade is always on top of things. Remember when his sidekick Scud betrayed him, but it turned out he knew all along Scud was betraying him and had a bomb implanted in him? That’s Blade, man. We’re talking about a guy who specially designs his sword to take off the hand of anybody else who touches it. Blade is prepared, he can handle shit. That’s what he does, handle shit. He doesn’t need some blind computer genius to give him a plan. Come on now. Especially if you’re really going to make this the last Blade movie, you can’t chump him like this, you bastards.

And what about Whistler! What about fucking Whistler? I don’t know about out in the red states but in the circles I run, the Kris Kristofferson mentor/sidekick character is considered one of the pantheon. One of the greats. He always grunts out funny lines, calling Ron Perlman a “nipple head” or busting through a wall with two machine guns and asking “Catch you fuckers at a bad time?” But in this one, where his part is much smaller, he doesn’t get the chance. He seems sick and he rushes out a bunch of exposition and then he gets one good line to go out on but that’s it. Fortunately the Hannibal King character has a lot of funny lines to pick up the slack but at the same time you’re thinking, who is this kid, this fucking bearded muscle kid, who is he to overshadow fucking Whistler?

That’s the bad news. Here’s the good news. Despite all this, this is still an enjoyable movie. Not a bonafide god damn masterpiece like the other two. But an enjoyable fizzle out of the greatest trilogy since Lord of the Rings and/or The Godfather. The Alien 3 of the series, maybe. I don’t know.

Because even when you take away all the great style, when the casting department starts phoning it in, when you make the storytelling a little sloppier… all you’re doing is fucking up the movie. But standing there in the middle of the movie, looking real fuckin cool, you still got Wesley Snipes and the character of Blade. Wesley Snipes is Blade. He has such conviction and such dedication to Blade, that even as the whole movie around him seems a little on the crappy side, he is completely unaffected. You look at him in awe. Because Wesley knows how Blade looks and talks and walks and stands and poses and fights. He could walk on to the set of some sitcom and he would still be Blade, standing there.

When Blade is surrounded by cops and knows he can’t get away, he doesn’t say anything. He’s samurai Blade. He holds onto his sheathed sword, considering it, but then sits down and holds out his sword in a samurai pose of surrender.

When Blade is shackled in an interogation room, he still looks imposing. He doesn’t offer much for the humans questioning him and seems more occupied with studying the room around him, figuring out what to do. (Too bad we never find out what he would’ve done. Because you fucking know he would’ve escaped.)

And I mean, he looks like the same exact Blade. Same haircut, sunglasses, coat, armor, posture. THe costume is a little altered and the biggest change is the color red. Now his coat has red on the inside, a nice touch for fighting Dracula. And he wears a long sleeved red shirt under his coat. I don’t know how exactly but somehow the red shirt makes him look like even more of a bad motherfucker. Not sure how to explain it. Somebody should look into this.

So any problems in the movie, they aren’t Blade’s fault. They are an injustice against Blade. Blade is clearly doing his part. David Goyer fucks some things up, but that can’t stop Blade. Blade lives on.

Man, I love Blade. America, I love Blade.

I got a few questions though. In BLADE II, the reapers were an artificially created mutant strain of vampires. So why does Dracula, the original vampire, have the same kind of mouth as the reapers? And why, in some article I read, do they claim that they were careful not to make the monsters in this one look like the reapers? There are only a couple monsters in this and they are not very impressive but their most memorable features are splitting mouths like the reapers.

Also, wouldn’t it suck to be a vampire? (not a pun) I realized as Blade was killing them that they have too many god damned vulnerabilities. I mean they really gotta work hard to kill Blade and his young companions. All Blade has to do is cut them with silver or expose them to sunlight, they die instantly. If they cut a human, the human still has to bleed to death. Of course, most vampires across the world probaly don’t ever encounter the Daywalker. If they’re smart, they won’t push it by coming up with some master plan or “vampire final solution” so they can be left the fuck alone.

What’s worse though is being a driver for the Nightstalkers. No fucking respect. In this movie there’s a young african-american gentlemen who shows up out of nowhere to pick up Blade and the kids. And you can read into it that Blade trusted him partly because he was a brother and because he chose to bump some beats while defying the po-po. But then they get in the car, Blade asks them who they are, Hannibal introduces himself and the girl. No mention of the driver at all. And soon after, he dies.

Come to think of it, we never get to find out anything about any of Blade’s black friends. I always wonder what happened to that guy in the first one, had that little shop where he used to hook up Blade with garlic. Blade has moved on to more powerful sedatives, but I’m sure they’re still friends. You saw the way they gave each other a pound. I bet Blade misses that dude more than ever now that he’s hanging out with these wisecracking white kids.

Anyway. The fights and action scenes in BLADE II seemed like a big step up from BLADE and the best job I’d ever seen of real SUPER-POWERED fighting. Remember Blade getting swung around and his head breaks through a cement column? The action this time isn’t as amazing but they do alot of fun new stuff, like a car chase (welcome back, Blade-mobile) and I really like the scene where Blade chases Dracula through an apartment building, and Dracula just runs through walls and jumps through ceilings and (fucking asshole) steals some lady’s baby.

There is also a whole lot of funny lines, almost all of them given to Hannibal King, who is sort of a Jason Lee type with muscles and guns. I realize this guy is the formula wisecracking character but somehow he sells pretty much all of them. While being tortured for information, he reveals that Blade is “working on a new formula for flavor crystals,” a pretty good moment. You gotta be skeptical about some white dude muscling in on Blade’s territory, but when he’s introduced wearing a sticker that says “Hello, my name is FUCK YOU,” it’s a good icebreaker.

One thing I’ve noticed about people in the vampire slaying business, they’re rescuing each other all the time. Whistler rescued Blade from the vampire library in part 1, Blade saved Whistler from a water tank in the opening of part 2, the Nighstalkers rescue Blade from the FBI headquarters in part 3 and later Blade and Abigail rescue Hannibal King from his interrogation/wisecracking session. In part 1 though it was just an example of Blade’s tremendous resources. Here he is railroad-spiked into a pole and surrounded by enemies, and he starts laughing. They get confused, why is he laughing? The camera moves in to reveal Blade’s earpiece which explains how he knows that Whistler is about to bust through the wall with that “catch you fuckers” line I mentioned before. Even when he’s nailed to a pole, he is not backed into a corner.

This time it’s Hannibal King that gets to laugh off his tormentor when he’s seemingly at a dead end. He knows Blade and Abigail are coming to save him and he starts to brag about it. They use this to set up a little joke, but it still didn’t get past this BLADE afficianado that Goyer is, consciously or not, tipping the movie a little bit toward the white dude. And this is a problem.

Now, who knows how true this is, but many articles have claimed that Snipes and Goyer got into a fist fight on the set and from then on Goyer travelled with a biker gang entourage. There are also claims of tension between Ryan Reynolds (who plays Hannibal King) and Snipes. Goyer has been telling web sights for months that he might make a spin-off about the Nightstalkers, that Ryan Reynolds is the greatest guy in the history of the world, that this would probaly be the last Blade movie, that they’d shot an ending where Blade dies and hadn’t decided whether or not to use it. Snipes supposedly wrote a letter to New Line Cinema complaining about the movie and its advertising focusing on the new white kids and not as much on Blade. And Ryan Reynolds who plays Hannibal King told Entertainment Weekly “I’ve never met Wesley Snipes, I’ve only met Blade.”

My guess is that Snipes, heavily into character as Blade, sensed the movie going away from his character, causing him to resent this goofball the same way Blade does. And causing him to get angry at Goyer. Which caused Goyer to get angry at him and move the movie even more away from being the triumphant last Blade movie and in the direction of being the episode of Growing Pains (or whichever show it was) that sets up Just the Ten of Us.

Blade is still the main character but he definitely has to share the spotlight with these Nightstalkers. And they’re fine, I got no problem with them, but they just aren’t Blade. I’m sure if they really make a spin-off about them I will watch it, and there’s a good chance I’ll like it. But the whole time I’ll be thinking yeah, these guys are cool. But they’re not fucking Blade. Not even close. I mean Whistler is better than these guys, and they didn’t make a Whistler movie.

And since SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER Whistler moves on to the big anti-vampire garage in the sky in this one, it doesn’t really make sense that we’re NOT focusing on Blade. We’ve always had Blade and his support team, now the support team is dead, so let’s see what Blade does on his own. The loner. Not the superstar graciously sharing the spotlight with the newcomers. Maybe David S. Goyer doesn’t get along with Blade anymore, but the rest of us do. So give us a fucking break, Goyer.

I still enjoyed watching it though. And I’m thankful that it’s not a total disaster. 4 more years of Bush and an unwatchable Blade III – what would be the point? I would’ve tossed myself off the nearest bridge.


  1. STOIC AS A MOTHERFUCKER. He doesn’t talk much or betray much emotion. If he smiles, his enemies know they got a problem.
  2. BUT SAYS “MOTHERFUCKER” ALOT. When he does talk he makes it count. Short and sweet. Often including the word motherfucker. Example: “Motherfuckers always tryin to ice skate uphill.”
  3. SWAGGER. Definitely knows how to swagger, strut, taunt, and menace. EXTREMELY good at walking cool in slow motion (probaly one of the top 2 or 3 slo-mo walkers in the history of motion pictures.)
  4. THE MOTHERFUCKER CAN FIGHT. He takes on all kinds of vampires, cops and super powered monsters in hand to hand combat, sword fights, shootouts, etc. Always wins. Usually without much hassle. But when it’s a tough fight he’s willing to go all the way, getting tossed through walls, cement pillars, etc. Skilled in many different weapons. Without #4, #3 could actually make him LESS badass. But he has #4 so don’t worry about it.
  5. THE MOTHERFUCKER CAN MOVE. Maybe the main thing that makes him stand out, the guy is elegant. His martial arts moves, the way he holds his sword, the way he walks. Even when he’s not moving it’s perfect – the super hero poses, the gargoyle crouches, the samurai meditation. He also has the best posture of all super heroes.
  6. ICONIC LOOK. The guy barely ever changes. Keeps the same flat top haircut (with a slight lowering over the years) and head tattoos, black leather jacket, armored vest, black pants, sword on the back. Doesn’t change into different outfits all the time. The costume slightly changes in different movies, but it’s always basically the same. When you see him you don’t have to get used to some new look or something. It’s the exact same guy. The Daywalker.
  7. THE WAY OF THE SAMURAI. He may be a black vampire slayer in the city but he is also kind of a samurai, the way he holds his sword, does little rituals, has a shrine to his mother and is indebted to the master who saved him.
  8. TRUE TO HIS HERITAGE THOUGH. He keeps his blackness but without fitting some jive ass stereotype. He never has to mention he’s black (the Will Smith syndrome) or use dated slang terms. But he knows how to give a brother a pound, his chosen martial art is capoeria (a Brazilian style) and has no problem taking care of white supremacist vampires (or whitulas).

This entry was posted on Sunday, December 12th, 2004 at 2:43 pm and is filed under Action, Comic strips/Super heroes, Horror, Reviews, Thriller. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

36 Responses to “Blade: Trinity”

  1. The new kids are just unwelcome in this movie. They introduce a tedious dynamic of having tension with Blade, and then Blade and them proving their worth to each other, and it just serves to fill time. It’s not a plot worthy of Wesley Snipes.

    The point where I officially judged this movie to be hopeless was when they were in the car, and Biel is playing with her iPod, and Reynolds explains to Blade something like “she always loads her playlist before a battle… sort of her own personal soundtrack…” and I just wanted to scream. Not only does Blade not give a fck about what some girl’s doing with her iPod, but WE don’t give a fck about some girl and her iPod.

    Also, the guy “Draco” who was supposed to be Dracula,… well, the old vampire guy in Blade II seemed like he was definitely supposed to be Count Orlok from Nosferatu, who is basically Dracula, so it’d already been done, and done much better.

    But all the stuff I didn’t like is more teenage girl friendly. This movie felt like it was geared toward teenage girls.

    It’s like, there is the right way to do a Blade movie, and there is the wrong way to do one. They did it the right way the first two times, so Goyer had succicient example at his disposal, but he still delivered a below average effort.

  2. I know I stand alone on this one, but I never really cared for Blade as a character (too one-note, not enough badass juxtaposition to make him interesting) until Ryan Reynolds showed up to make fun of him. Then his impervious hardassery had something to play off of, making him more than just a scowling video game avatar. BLADE:TRINITY was far from perfect, but introducing a dose of absurdity into the self-seriousness of the BLADE universe worked for me.

  3. Mr. M — I felt like the problem was that Reynolds and Beil are too similar to Blade to be an effective foil. They’re pretty much doing the same thing, just not quite as well. I’d prefer Blade either had a kinda-equal partner (like Whistler) or they did the usual thing and gave Blade a sidekick with different focus or skillset. Reynolds especially puts a lot of effort into being likeable, sarcastic and badass at the same time, but it just feels like Blade ended up with two lamer versions of himself. Also I thought adding TWO other competent vampire-killers them diluted both new characters and made everyone seem to kick compatatively less ass since its apparently such a common talent. The basic idea of someone to introduce a little levity didn’t both me, but the way the executed it sort of deflated the whole thing.

    Although you gotta love the comment above, which solemnly sates that, “It’s not a plot worthy of Wesley Snipes.”

  4. I really, REALLY hated Reynolds in this flick, so much so that I couldn’t stand the sight of him for years. Recently, I’ve come to realise he’s not a bad actor, though not all that good either, and often still pretty annoying.

  5. I remember when I saw the posters a few months before the movie, I was like, “who the fuck are these two white kids with Blade? Who the fuck is that pretty boy?”. So I really wasn’t expecting to like both of them so much. I totally understand why everyone hates this movie – it is pretty weird to have a series’ main character make room for two young bucks that seem to appeal to an entirely different demographic (WB-types vs. comic book geeks). But I never felt Blade took a back seat. He kicks the most ass, he defeats the main villain, he doesn’t even really pass the torch to these guys. (I love that there’s NO resolution between him and Reynolds whatsoever) And even though he doesn’t get as much dialogue or screentime, Snipes is actually really amazing in this movie. He commands the screen by doing very little, like Angelina Jolie in Wanted.

    As for Reynolds, yeah, it’s a polarizing performance (about half my friends thought the interrogation scene was about 5 jokes too long, half my friends wanted it to keep going). I personally thought he was channeling Bruce Willis in Hudson Hawk a little bit, which is always a good thing in my book.

  6. I did detect a little Hudson Hawksian vibe in that scene. Good call, neal2.

  7. Neal — I don’t think the performance is the problem; I think Reynolds really goes for it and makes it work better than it should. The problem is fundamentally the character, and the way he and whatsherface change the dynamic of the film. I’m actually kind of surprised people found Reynolds so insufferable — he makes the most of an awkward situation and emerges way more likable than he should, in my estimation. But everything about the character (and the girl, who is just as bad but not as memorable) is just wrong for the movie, and its pretty hard to ignore that fact.

  8. billydeethrilliams

    December 16th, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    And best supporting actor oscar goes to…….. Triple H.

  9. Mr. Subtlety – I can’t remember, have you seen the Blade TV Series? I freaking loved it and I think it might be up your alley. Even though it does revolve around Blade mentoring a young, hot, white girl again (the host from Wipeout!), it actually does retain more of the serious vibe of the first two movies, and she’s definitely a more developed character than Biel’s.

    One more thing – seeing this in a theater and seeing tons of black women in the audience hooting and hollering at the sight of a shirtless Ryan Reynolds was one of my favorite movie-going moments of all time. It seemed for a brief moment all was right in the world.

  10. Am I the only one who loved the scene where Dracula discovers that he became a popculture joke over the centuries? This might be my 2nd favourite Dracula-meets-modern-world scene, right after the one where he watches that music video in DRACULA 2000 and declares it “a masterpiece”.

  11. “How Blade Helped Save Comic Book Movies” — nice article which elaborates a little on something already well known around these parts. http://www.blastr.com/2014-3-12/unsung-hero-how-blade-helped-save-comic-book-movie

  12. Currently it looks like Movable Type is the top
    blogging platform out there right now. (from what I’ve read)
    Is that what you are using on your blog?

  13. BLADE THREE is like the runt of the litter, the one-nutted dog with the limp, that you feel sorry for cause he tries so hard to be like the other dogs. So you have to offer this dog SOME love, otherwise you’d just feel like an arsehole.

    Obviously it lacks the distinctive artistic vision of the first two, as Vern pointed out. There’s not much in the way of atmosphere, or the darkness of BLADE 2. Most of the action takes place in the daytime or in brightly lit rooms and offices. The villain Drake is a charisma free vacuum and is inconceivably boring. It even sounded like they dubbed Dominic Purcells voice in some scenes to make it deeper. And he sucks at throwing babies off roofs.

    Parker Posey I have a soft spot for. She’s cute like Bridget Fonda, not glamorous but lovable, so I couldn’t really buy her as a vampire, the same way I couldn’t buy Fonda as a prostitute junkie in KISS OF THE DRAGON.

    Reynolds was actually good as Hannibal, funny without being annoying. He gets to give the best insult ever to Posey – “cock-juggling thunder-c#*t”. If only he brought the same edge and charisma to GREEN LANTERN.

    Blade got to kick some good arse. The action was clear, even if it was shot in a fancy free way.

    I don’t get the TRINITY thing. Is it meant to be a reference to the FATHER (Blade), SON (Hannibal) and SPIRIT (Daughter of Whistler)? I doubt it, unless they were going for something more significant in early drafts and it got railroaded.

    It didn’t feel like Snipes owned this movie, but he was still cool. I liked it.

  14. That was an unexpected post-credits teaser in GOTG. It was cool when a certain vampire hunter showed up and spin-kicked a stake into Ronan the Accuser. So he was a vampire I guess?

  15. Hello to all, does anyone know what type of armored vest Wesley Snipes used in the first two Blade movies?

  16. The Original Paul

    June 5th, 2015 at 5:04 pm

    Murphy – no idea, sorry. Probably Wikipedia would have the answer to that one.

    Y’know I had no idea Vern had even reviewed BLADE 3? He’s more forgiving of its flaws than I am.

  17. I´ll defend TRINITY. I rewatched it awhile back and there is actually some really stunning sequences in the movie. The one in which Dracula is stalking the Nightstalkers is actually eerie and creepy and finding all those people dead is actually quite harrowing considering we just recently watched them laughing around and joking. I think TRINITY has too much of a bad rep. And that sequence is proof of it. There are some neat stuff in it; the vampire dogs, Ryan Reynolds wisecraking is actually quite funny and some of the action is incredible. I mean look at this:


  18. Point is, I think we should be thankful for TRINITY. It´s not BLADE 2. But then again what is?

  19. Personally my favourite moment in that movie is when Dracula discovers that he became a popculture joke. It’s my favourite Dracula-in-the-modern-world moment, since he watched a heavy metal music video in DRACULA 2000 and declared it a masterpiece.

  20. (Which is something I said earlier in this thread. I should have just scrolled up. It’s Sunday. Whatever.)

  21. Reynolds wisecracking makes me think if he wouldn´t have been a better choice as McClane Jr in RELUCTANT HERO 5: A GOOD DAY TO BE RELUCTANT.

  22. The Original Paul

    June 7th, 2015 at 9:30 am

    Man, am I the only one here who really hates this movie? And not for the same reasons as I hate, say, YOUNG ADULT or BOYHOOD, which I think are genuinely good movies in some ways. TRINITY is awful because it’s a shit-show from start to finish. That it’s not the worst thing Ryan Reynolds has been involved in speaks volumes about just how bad BURIED is, but still… TRINITY is shockingly bad. I mean, I’d heard that it was awful, and even then I wasn’t prepared for just how bad it would be. And I don’t often say things like that. JOHNNY MNEMONIC I found completely unwatchable, and yet the worst I could say about it is “I don’t get it”.

    I mean, I’m not a great fan of BLADE 2. Don’t hate it, don’t love it. It’s pretty good as an action movie but it just keeps throwing so much extraneous stuff at me that I don’t care about. The worst thing that I can say about it is that it panders really obviously to the “geek” crowd, to the point where it loses focus. I hate the “Scud” subplot, dislike the ubervamps (it would’ve been so much better if the Blood Pack had been the antagonists instead of being relegated to bit-parts), and groan at the sewer level, the vampire ninjas, and the Spiderman villain. I think it would’ve been way better if they’d just focussed on the three things that really work (Blade, the romance, the Blood Pack) and left all the rest of it out. Still, what we do get is pretty good. (Apart from Scud. Seriously, fuck that guy.)

    But compared to TRINITY… man, compared to that, BLADE 2 is the masterpiece that several people here seem to think that it is. Snipes and Kristofferson manage to hide their seething dislike for one another in BLADE 2, for one thing. Not so in TRINITY. It could not be more obvious that nobody involved in the making of that movie gave a shit about it, apart from Reynolds and Biel, both of whom are annoying as hell. The level of pandering in TRINITY makes BLADE 2 look positively restrained. That fuckin’ iPod! Combine that with a version of Dracula who makes Johnny Lee Miller look impressive, and the fact that the only bearable character in the whole thing gets Queen Latifah’d two-thirds of the way through… it’s just awful. Awful-looking, awful-sounding, with awful characters, awful performances and awful CGI, it’s a stain on the BLADE franchise.

    What I’m trying to get across here is that I don’t like it very much. Can you tell?

  23. Ok, I’ll be that guy. I prefer TRINITY over BLADE II. Del Toro’s films never quite hit the mark for me (and if you can’t reel me in with PACIFIC RIM, you aren’t my kinda guy), but BLADE II had some of the worst CGI I’ve ever seen. Cool ideas (the fight in front of the UV lights was great in concept, but executed horribly), but just not carried out well. BLADE II was an interesting left turn, but I prefer TRINITY’S return to the world set up in the first film, where Esperanto is a well-known language but other than that, its pretty much business as usual. I guess I’m also biased as a fan of the Blue Beetle, because Ryan Reynolds comes across as my ideal Ted Kord in this flick. Flippant, cut, and swearing like a mawfucka (Ted swears more than any other superhero, if you look closely). I even like the support team quite a bit. Patton Oswalt and Natasha Lyonne are always welcome, in my opinion, and I would’ve loved to see the Blade universe continue on with this team. Nothing touches the original, of course, but I think BLADE III, shitty Drac aside, wraps up the trilogy quite nicely.

  24. I’m with you, Jerome, and not just on TRINITY. I’ve recently realized that I like del Toro himself way more than I like his movies. I want to listen to him talking about them more than I want to watch them. His Spanish-language horror movies are great but too depressing to watch very frequently, while his pop stuff is usually pretty enjoyable but never fully hangs together, despite tons of cool ingredients. I was never able to articulate this until listening to the commentary track on PACIFIC RIM and realizing that the movie he was describing in his soothing rasp was so much better than the movie I saw in theaters. Even when he was describing filmmaking strategies that I felt totally ruined that movie, it sure SOUNDED like a good idea. I guess that’s the definition of Vern’s “Friend of the Internet” concept: You like the guy’s movies because he seems cool, not vice versa.

    I mean, BLADE II is still pretty good but I was kind of hoping for more out of the guy by this point.

  25. The Original Paul

    June 7th, 2015 at 4:00 pm

    In defence of Del Toro, PAN’S LABYRINTH is fucking fantastic.

    My feelings about the BLADE series are:

    BLADE: pretty close to a classic.
    BLADE 2: Mostly gets Blade (the character) right (we’ll conveniently ignore the Scud scenes there, since the protagonist always gets pussified when dealing with the Nerd Insert stereotype and Blade is no exception) but gets pretty much everything else that I loved about the original BLADE wrong. Still good on its own terms.
    BLADE 3: Hate. Hate. Haaaate.
    BLADE THE SERIES: Only got to the second episode and the quality was really ropey; but two-thirds of the way through the second ep, it did something that was so damn ballsy that I absolutely did not see coming, it makes me want to dedicate more time to it. I will when I have that time.

  26. Del Toro himself complained about that scene in front of the lights (maybe on the commentary track) but I’ve always liked that they look like animated characters. If that’s the worst computer animation you’ve ever seen I have a great recommendation for you called THE MUMMY RETURNS.

  27. Let me remind y’all. Constable Bob is in TRINITY

  28. Funny. I’ve been feeling the same way about Del Toro lately. I recently tried to re-watch HELLBOY and couldn’t get through it. I found it prematurely dated and hokey. And his films still look the same. I saw PACIFIC RIM once in the theatre and have yet to experience any desire to see it again.

    CRIMSON PEAK looks stylish and appropriately gothic but even in the trailers, something seems off or missing. It just doesn’t look scary, really.

  29. The Original Paul

    June 8th, 2015 at 10:34 am

    All I have to add is, you know how Vern recommended seeing THE MUMMY RETURNS, albeit seriously ironically, above? Yeah, don’t do that.

    I’ve at least liked everything of Del Toro’s that I’ve seen. Thought PAN’S LABYRINTH was bloody brilliant actually, but maybe that’s an outlier in his work. I have heard great things about most of his foreign-language output. Maybe he’s one of these directors who works best in his own culture or tongue, like John Woo?

  30. I’m gonna walk back my criticism a bit. I still like almost all of del Toro’s movies, but since the only one I don’t like is also the only one he’s directed in seven years, I’m a little less psyched about his potential than I used to be.

  31. So Snipes revealed he’s had meetings with Marvel about possibly doing a Blade movie. Exciting news at first…then I realise if it was a movie, it would probably be a PG-13 movie, and would that work?

  32. Personally I would think it would work very well. Blade would probably only drop one F-bomb, all humans would die mostly bloodless, but I can imagine lots of Blade-on-Vampire violence might stay in the movie.

    Or they send him to Netflix. Marvel seems to have less trouble with harder violence there, from what I’ve heard.

  33. I hope it pulls through. Snipes’ Blade deserves one more competent adventure to make up for his lackluster final outing at least. Also I can’t say anybody else as Blade anyway. In the cases of comic book heroes like REDACTED or Superman it’s easier to see how different actors could bring different dimensions to their own interpretations. Since they are so multilayered in their source material. Blade on the other hand was always one dimensional and extremely generic. He was pretty wack and if anything the Snipes version is a case of the movie taking something that never lived up to it’s promise and really going all out. Without a doubt his is the only version of Blade that matters. So it’s only right that he gets to continue.

  34. Vern, THE MUMMY RETURNS also has some of the worst CGI I’ve ever seen, and is also one of the laziest, rote sequels I have ever laid eyes on. Which is a shame, as I have a particular love for the original. But hey, NOTHING LASTS FOREVER, amirite?

    Paul-PAN’S LABYRINTH is totally great, and easily my favorite Del Toro.

  35. The Blade II retrospect brought me here, and I had to voice my opinion, as one is wont to do on the internet.

    And I’m glad Vern pointed it out in the review, but my biggest problem with the flick is that it wasn’t the awesome-sounding sequel that Goyer had stated was going to happen, where the vampires have won but are dying out, and Blade is myth and it was gonna be from the guy who made Downfall. Seeing this, while entertaining, was such a letdown from how awesome a movie it could be.

    Then again, I got to sort of see that movie with Daybreakers, which was sorely lacking an awesome Blade-type character, instead focusing on, something. I don’t remember it that well.

  36. aries lovers

    Blade: Trinity – Vern's Reviews on the Films of Cinema Vern's Reviews on the Films of Cinema

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>