"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

A Working Man

A WORKING MAN is a 2025 Jason Statham joint that I missed in theaters. Felt guilty about it too. Then waited until now to catch up on video, for some reason. I agree with the conventional wisdom that it’s not one of his better works, but in my opinion it is in fact watchable. So that’s what I did. I watched it.

It’s a much less absurd one than THE BEEKEEPER, even though it comes from the same director, David Ayer. Being a little less silly is not a bad thing in and of itself (I really liked Statham’s recent more serious one, SHELTER), but it is kind of weird coming from the director of wild movies like SABOTAGE and SUICIDE SQUAD. They aren’t all great, but they’re usually not bland. Here he’s credited as co-writing the screenplay with Sylvester Stallone (who also wrote HOMEFRONT), based on the novel Levon’s Trade by Chuck Dixon. (Note: Stallone sold out his legacy to become a Trump stooge and Dixon is one of the comics legends now better known for whining about the scary wokeness coming after him, but thankfully the movie isn’t really pushing right wing buttons like, say, LAST BLOOD.)

It uses one of the most elemental action setups possible. Statham’s character, apparently named Levon Cade (I’m surprised they didn’t say his name more) is a foreman for Garcia Family Construction, but he used to be a Royal Marine Commando. He doesn’t tell anybody that, but it comes out when some gangsters are shaking down one of the workers on the site so Levon comes at them with a bucket of nails and a pickaxe, beats them up and points a gun at them until they leave. The boss’s 19-year-old business major daughter Jenny (Arianna Rivas, Mustang from BLACK PHONE 2) witnesses this and asks if it’s “some military shit.”

It’s a ridiculous trope that I still get a kick out of: the TAKEN/EQUALIZER idea that if you were in the military or intelligence community it means you learned all the secret wrist breaking and gun disarming moves and can effortlessly take on any number of badasses, even (especially?) if they’re armed and you’re not. Since it’s Statham it’s more of a full-on martial arts type of fight, but that’s what’s funny is that she still knows he learned it in the military. Later she’ll be abducted and her parents (Michael Peña [OBSERVE AND REPORT] and Noemi Gonzalez [PARANORMAL ACTIVITY: THE MARKED ONES]) will come to Levon for help, explaining that they have a Green Beret relative so they can tell he was in the military. IYKYK.

The one unusual thing is that the opening credits illustrate his military history with computer animated renderings of war and bullets and his British passport and a cement mixer that turns into a hand grenade. I guess that last one made it worthwhile, but it felt very weird that they needed to illustrate his past. That’s never been a requirement for Statham. Tell us he’s ex-something if you must, or just have him kick ass and don’t explain it. Trust me, we’ll go along with it. Of course we don’t need animation to tell us he was in The War On Terror, because why the hell else would he be so into waterboarding? Normal people would never consider doing water torture on a person, it is just not an idea or desire that comes up. This guy does it twice.

When he scared the Mexican gangsters away in that first fight I thought uh oh, this is like LAST BLOOD, Stallone’s hero has to love one “good” Mexican family so that it’s okay that the rest are shown as invading monsters. I wondered whether these guys would be the ones to kidnap the daughter or if it would be another party and later he’d cross these guys again and it would complicate things because he has two different factions to fight. Actually it’s neither! They take his advice and don’t come back. No MS-13 business in this, the bad guys are just Russian. Oh shit, is this that wokeness? I like it.

The abduction is similar to that goofy Milla Jovovich movie I enjoyed recently, PROTECTOR – Jenny goes out with her friends for underage drinking on her birthday, somebody grabs her, a sleazy bartender is in on it. Jenny is one-of-a-kind though so her night involves renting a party van, providing fake IDs for all participants and giving her dad an itemized invoice for it all. (Well, probly not the IDs.)

Levon first says he can’t help, that’s not his life anymore, but immediately changes his mind and begins investigating leads, using his laptop, security footage zooming, following a tracking device he puts on a car, moving his way through a trail of Russian gangsters until he gets to a guy named Dimi (Maximilian Osinski, GREYHOUND). I like that these gangsters have very over-the-top fashion, including a pair of henchmen who wear shiny track suits with bucket hats. There’s a funny bit that Levon kills a guy and leaves the body, the guy’s Russian mafia boss Wolo Kolisnyk (Jason Flemyng, LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENTLEMEN) shows up and bribes a cleaning crew to dispose of the body, pretty soon Levon has killed Kolisnyk and somebody higher up pays the same crew to get rid of his body. Business is good.

It took me a while to understand that this isn’t some ransom situation, it’s just human trafficking, and for some reason they specifically want Jenny for some particular rich guy, so a whole network of criminals dedicates an inordinate amount of time on it, convinced they will get lots of money (but contradictorily being confused by Levon caring so much. It’s just one girl, they say).

Levon is not a father figure to Jenny, just a co-worker. He actually has a young daughter named Merry (Isla Gie, LEGEND HAS IT) but he only gets to see her two hours a week. She lives with her grandpa Dr. Roth (Richard Heap), a rich guy who blames Levon for his daughter’s suicide and always lectures him about violence. Also he’s not the type of guy you’d expect as snooty father-in-law – he’s a big tall dude with a deep voice, introduced wearing a furry Jamiroquai type hat.

Trying to regain custody, Levon has to stop sleeping in his gigantic construction worker truck and establish a steady residence. The exaggerated shittiness of the place he rents out is funny because it looks almost the same as the sex trafficking dungeon where they lock up Jenny. Maybe they’re neighbors.

During the course of his crusade Levon takes a bunch of money off of dead gangsters, so I thought it would be funny if he started staying in increasingly nicer places. Instead he uses some of the money to fund his activities and throws some into a swimming pool.

Of course Levon calls upon old friends for help, including a blind ex-Marine (David Harbour, HELLBOY 2019) who gives him weapons and a DEA agent who tells him to go undercover buying a blue crystalline drug to find Dimi. First he has to go to a bar called Hattie’s (not the one in Ballard) and demand passage into the backroom where the leader of a biker gang (Chidi Ajufo, DOOM: ANNIHILATION) sits on a throne like the one in Game of Thrones except it’s made out of motorcycle mufflers instead of swords. They bond and call each other “brother” when they recognize each other as veterans, so even though this guy’s a drug dealer working with human traffickers Levon respectfully closes his dead eyelids after stabbing a hunting knife all the way through his neck into a pillar.

One thing that makes this more tolerable than other versions of the exact same story is that Jenny has a little more personality and a little more to do than the usual crying victim. She gets to be funny a couple times, also gets to fight back, even bites off chunks of flesh on two separate occasions. At the beginning there’s a part where her dad is listing things he’s provided for her and one of them is karate lessons. Peña’s delivery left me in suspense as to whether it was a set up for some karate or just the off-the-cuff gag he plays it as. Later we see a karate trophy in her bedroom so I thought okay, they’re probly gonna do it but if not it’s a genuine genre violation. No problem, they do do it – she’s tied at the wrists but she swings around kicking and scissoring. Also they do the trope where there’s one female henchperson for her to fight. Her name is Artemis (Eve Mauro, BULLET) and she’s a pretty funny character because she’s constantly throwing tantrums about how bad everything is going.

You get a couple fun Statham fights, some explosions, a chase on a motorcycle that I think was maybe greenscreen? But not elaborate like the one in THE VILLAINESS. Fight coordinators are Guillermo Grispo (THE LEGEND OF HERCULES) and Darren Nop (BLACK WIDOW). The action is entertaining enough, but not as involved as in THE BEEKEEPER, which stunt coordinator/second unit director Eddie J. Fernandez also worked on. 

And that kinda sums it up – a mid-range Statham vehicle, decent but unspectacular. The good news is that’s above average for the majority of prolific action stars. If I have a major complaint, it’s that the whole “working man” angle is bigger in the marketing than the movie. He works construction at the beginning and does fight with tools a few times, but I would like to see him dump some cement on somebody, headbutt a guy while wearing a construction helmet, maybe erect a whole building that he needs for his plan. A night club where he has to meet somebody. Or a house for himself. He’s a working man, but I know he could work harder. Still, I’m glad Statham is still pumping ‘em out. In these times we’ve gotta have one institution we can count on.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 7th, 2026 at 7:22 am and is filed under Reviews, Action. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

15 Responses to “A Working Man”

  1. Always nice to see Statham reunited with Jason Flemyng, especially when Flemyng gets to revisit the Russian accent he used in TRANSPORTER 2. The heavy eastern European accents gave this an old school vampire movie vibe for me, with the ending really feeling like Statham was stepping into a vampire’s nest.

  2. Extremely middling Statham Vehicle if not a straight up disappointing since it’s his next movie after the great Beekeeper with the same director as well.
    Bit of a slog to get through with it’s absence of humor and it’s too tangled byzantine way of getting to the point of saving the girl. Also the bland action scenes are interspersed between a LOT of surveillance and stupid plot (movie’s too long for what it is, bring back the 90 minute actioner).
    As to the “thank God it’s not MS 13, it’s the Russian mafia” the only problem with that is that the Russian mafia has been done to death, resurrected and redone to death, and you have to have a great movie behind it to not feel tired as well. I can attest to the gimmicky outfits which give SOME flair but there so much a flashy costume can do on a boring movie.
    You can pass on this one if you’re not a Statham completist.

  3. Vern, I always respect your reviews and your position of looking at things from a half-glass-full perspective, but this one was awful. It’s Statham’s worst movie since 13. The ending set piece/location is a disaster – I could not stop thinking about the giant fake moon as a prime example of the shoddiness on display. There was no reason for this to be 2 hours long as well. Looking forward to Beekeeper 2 (and catching up with Shelter) to clean the palate from this.

  4. I saw WORKING MAN and BEEKEEPER on the same day, and what struck me is that both are built around plot devices that are staples of real-world Russian organized crime, and which have been on the rise: phishing scams, and sex trafficking.

    BEEKEEPER’s villains are American, but the phishing scam part is distinctly Russian-tinged: spoiled oligarch son who feels positively entitled to a constant revenue stream from some industrialized predation that it seems like he inherited; when something threatens it, he expects the state to intervene to protect him. WORKING MAN goes further, showing that the money and power behind the abduction flows from old-school organized crime, servicing the depraved desires of some wealthy pervert who has a hankering for that one girl.

    In both of these movies, the bad stuff is set in motion by one or two bad people with unreasonable desires, whose power derives specifically from corrupting criminal wealth, creating a cottage industry of mid-tier baddies lining up to service those demands. The baddies here aren’t trying to conquer space or topple nations, they merely want to prey on individuals with impunity, and they want most of the grunt work done for them; “Predation as a Service,” if you will.

    This casts Statham as a kind of 21st century James Bond. James Bond is able to succeed where other LEOs fail because he has the manners of the social elite, allowing him to penetrate the layers of social privilege that shield billionaire villains from standard law enforcement and national security agencies. Statham is able to succeed because he is an invincible juggernaut who kills his way up the chain of command. Each hero fits a specific kind of pathological villainy.

    To the extent that movies are stories we tell ourselves about the worlds we might live in, it seems notable to me that the stories we’re writing about combating the most visible abuses of the Russian mob depend entirely on an impossibly competent vigilante who operates entirely outside the law. These two movies struck me as recession indicators. But even more, kleptocracy indicators.

  5. I mean, that’s just the classic western format: Rich land baron abuses the townsfolk, using his money and influence to escape justice, until one righteous gunslinger who can be neither bought nor killed stands up to him. A tale so well-traveled it’s basically folklore at this point. We’ve done it with cowboys, rogue cops, martial artists, retired spies, war vets, everymen just protecting hearth and home, hitmen trying to get out of the game, superheroes, the occasional sentient android…everything. Same story, different skins. i agree that it’s a response to kleptocracy, but it’s a response that been a part of America’s cinematic DNA since the silent era. Which should tell you something about America.

  6. I’m glad there is at least one semi-big star out there who chooses to take a leaf out of Charles Bronson’s Big Book of Acting. I for one need a yearly output from Statham where he is that stoic, gruff and dependable problem solver. I don’t want character development, soul searching, cute kids or talking animals. It’s like Vince says, the old western format. And lucky for us he has, up until now at least, gone with the Randolph Scott style. Short and to the point. And we’ve had over 25 years of this now. Usually they don’t last more than 10 tops (see Seagal, Norris etc.). As many have pointed out, WORKING MAN might be his equivalent of Bronson’s BREAKOUT. But you know that soon after we will get a, let’s say, HARD TIMES. Or in this case SHELTER, then MUTINY and then BEEKEEPER 2. But, like Ernest said, we need way more Flemyng in these movies!

  7. The constant scenes of surveillance and interrogation slash torture (other than co-creating the character of Bane, Chuck Dixon is also famous for originally writing this scene: https://youtu.be/a0apBr9Td_0). A revolving door of organized crime characters, from the Russian mob to meth dealing bikers. The way Harbour and Statham fangirled over a M14 rifle. For better or for worse, this movie definitely feels like it originated from a guy who wrote something like 70 issues of early nineties Punisher comics.

  8. Yeah, lower tier Statham, but still not exactly bad, and has a few moments of action movie absurdity to treasure.

    Something I will say in this film’s favor. I was hoping for a Beekeeper follow-up that reached that film’s fevered heights. It didn’t, but the look of the film was frequently good. It does successfully ape the semi-giallo lighting and excessive set design of The Beekeeper.

    It’s not a great movie, but it’s visual component is putting in the work.

  9. Trailer for The Stath’s latest ‘Mutiny’ just dropped and it looks good. Die Hard on a Boat. Dude’s a one man franchise but I am here for it. But yes let’s be honest this one was not as good as The Beekeeper which was excellent Friday night fare.

  10. Having watched the trailer for MUTINY… is this just a reworking of the apparently cancelled PLANE sequel, SHIP? Same director and everything.

  11. Same director and everything

    Man, when I heard the Stath and Richet were joining forces, I got jazzed. The trailer indicates I have every reason to remain jazzed.

    The trailer OPENS with a “How badass is this guy?” speech

  12. I do love the “they were in the military” trope Vern mentions, films seemingly existing in a world where day one of any boot camp is pushups and potato peeling, and day two is defeating an entire ninja clan in a restaurant kitchen using improvised weapons. It’s a nice shorthand that gets the backstory out of the way in a sentence or two, but it does make me laugh sometimes.

    If I ever wrote an action film, my protagonist’s first ass-whipping scene would be followed by a reveal that they’d once worked at, like, an Amazon warehouse or a marketing firm, and the story would proceed as usual.

  13. “How badass is he?” speech and it’s just “He worked a double shift at a Waffle House Memorial Day weekend. Twice.”

  14. Honestly, I wouldn’t question it.

  15. How cool wouldn’t UNDER SIEGE have been if Ryback was just a cook…

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>