"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Gladiator

Well here it is, the big three oh and I’m sorry to say boys, I’m gonna have to say something that some of you won’t like. Although the gals probaly won’t mind. What I have to say is that Ridley Scott is not that fucking great, jesus fucking christ.

I mean it seems like I’ve been reading about Gladiator over there on the Ain’t It Cool News and in the newsgroups since I was a young man and these motherfuckers will NOT stop drooling about Ridley Scott. Ridley Scott’s gonna bring back the gladiator movies. Ridley Scott’s gonna direct a vampire movie. Ridley’s Scott’s gonna come to my Red Dwarf marathon blah blah blah. Like the man was Clint Eastwood personified.

Now I admit, there are some good pictures this guy made about twenty years ago. One of them is Alien, a scary space movie which takes Yaphet Kotto’s character from Blue Collar into outer space. The other is Blade Runner, which is the one about the robot detective.

But I mean, there are alot of people who did something good twenty years ago. I remember I gave my old lady a ride to church one day, for one example. But that don’t mean my shit don’t need flushin and I feel the same can be said for Ridley Scott and his shit in my opinion.

GladiatorTo be fair I guess I don’t fit into the usual demographic of the internet movie fan, or “movie geek”. For example I do not like hobbits. Ridley has another picture called Legend, which is about hobbits. So that is one of the reasons why the boys like him better than I do. Hobbits.

I guess I’m not a big fan of gladiating either because Ridley’s new picture Gladiator really isn’t as hot as everybody’s saying as far as I’m concerned. This is a picture about the fall of the roman empire and fighting a tiger. Russell Crowe plays Maximus, a heroic general in the roman army who is famous and loved because he is very good at committing the genocide against barbarians.

After 20 years of war, the old Caesar is near death, and feels kind of bummed about having killed everybody in sight and taken over their land in the name of peace. He wants to go back to a democracy and to peace, so he chooses general Maximus the renowned killer to become the next emperor. This is supposed to be a good choice over Caesar’s son Caesar, jr., the natural successor, because he is a puss who wants to fuck his sister.

There is alot of scenes there to show you that Caesar jr. is a puss so that you will hate him. First, he is gone for the entire war! Maximus is cutting dudes heads off right and left and this puss is out on vacation. Junior also wears makeup and blinks his eyes all girly like bugs bunny wearing fake eyelashes. And whenever Maximus gets the upper hand, he start to pout and whine and it seems like he’s gonna cry.

But then there is also one scene where he has his shirt off and practices his sword. This is because there will be a sword duel at the end of the movie so you have to show that he is only a puss enough for you to hate him, but not a puss enough for him not to have a sword duel at the end. This doesn’t give away the ending though because the idea is, that won’t be for a good 2 and a half or 3 hours so you’ll have forgot about the shirtless scene by then. Movie magic.

Anyway what happens is, after about half an hour, Junior finds out that Maximus is going to be the new emperor, so he kills his dad and has Maximus’s family killed and has his henchmen take Maximus out to some place to kill him. But he doesn’t even check up on Maximus enough to find out that he escaped, and just assumes he’s dead. So I guess it proves he is not a good leader. Then some guys capture Maximus and sell him as a slave to a guy with a pet giraffe. So now Junior is the emperor and General Maximus is a slave. You see?

Basically, this would be the first ten minutes of any other movie. In Blacula, it takes ten minutes to show how Dracula turned an African prince into a vampire in the ghetto. In the zorro movie, it takes ten minutes to show how the old Zorro lost everything and got locked up, and then into the real story.

But Ridley Scott doesn’t want just one ten minutes. He wants three or four of them. You’re just gonna have to be patient.

So eventually Maximus is a slave, and they make him fight as a gladiator. He fights real good, because he is not a puss. That is why you like him. He is supposed to get killed off in the first match but he becomes so popular that Emperor Junior has no choice but to turn him into a good guy. Then he gets more popular than Hulk Hogan and he tries to start a revolution for revenge and then he has the sword fight with Junior, etc.

The basic story is good in the same way zorro is. Everybody likes a good slave getting revenge on the faggy emperor story. That is what americans like. But the problem is, this is a movie about fighting, where there is no good fighting.

Now believe me, I have been in alot of fights. And in my opinion, fights are exciting. When you break a bottle over a man’s head, or stab a man in the balls with the sharpened edge of a pudding can, or whatever, you get a certain adrenaline rush. I would think sword fighting or tiger fighting would be the same. But in this picture, I don’t know WHAT the fuck is going on. So it is hard to get excited. You almost wish the motherfuckers would stop fighting and start talking about politics again.

For example, there is a scene where some guys come out on chariots. And Maximus says, “Gang, we gotta stick together! We work together as a team and we can defeat these bitches!” Or whatever.

And then, I don’t know WHAT the fuck happened. The chariot flipped over and I thought, “I wish I knew how they did that.” There was a tall guy, and a black guy. Then they were fighting (?) Not 100% sure what happened in that scene. Something having to do with gladiators, if I understood correctly.

This is how I explained it over on rec.arts.current-films. Remember in Enter the Dragon, there were two main guys, Bruce Lee and John Saxon. Bruce Lee was a real life karate master, and John Saxon was just some white actor.

Well when Bruce fights in the movie, they go all out to show how amazing he is. They show all his kicks, his punches, they get all the movement and the dude looks great.

But John Saxon, that white motherfucker can’t fight worth shit. So all the photographing is in real close, you can’t see his arms or legs hit anything and you just have to assume he’s doing some good fighting out there past the edges of the screen.

Gladiator is a whole three hour movie of John Saxon fights, so you can only give it the benefit of the doubt that there is some kind of good action scene going on there somewhere. For all I know these motherfuckers aren’t even holding swords.

I guess this is what the kids like in action movies, such as Armageddon. It is a more abstract type of deal where you can’t tell who is standing where or what in fuck’s name they are doing, so you can interpretate it more like a poem or painting. It goes back to that old deal that people say about Psycho, that it is scarier because the violence is off screen. Now they do the same thing with action movies, it is more action packed because you can’t make out any of the action.

But jesus, that don’t mean I have to like it.

Not that the movie is totally lacking. I kind of liked the big stick it to the man scene where Maximus got to reveal to the emperor that he was still alive and plotting his revenge. Also there is a scene when he wiped his snot on his dead wife’s toes.

But gimme a fuckin break pal, this movie is not the best thing since sliced bread or Ghost Dog and it will not stand the test of time. Maximus is not a great Badass because as far as I know he didn’t even do anything badass. In order to be a great Badass you gotta have one or more of these qualities: extraordinary fighting skills, unbearably powerful presence such as Clint Eastwood, cocky attitude and quiet but with occasional excellent comebacks, or just look really intimidating even while holding a violin or umbrella.

The only one Maximus has is (I think) the fighting skill, but I can’t tell what exactly he does so it’s not that impressive. I mean for all we know the guy is cheating. If the camera’s not gonna show specifically what he does then I’m not gonna get excited. Send us a better demo reel bud maybe we’ll talk.

Then there is junior, the bitchy tyrant villain. Alan Cumming played this exact same character better in Titus. He was funnier, eviler, and had better costumes. He was more faggy AND got more pussy. He’s a way better villain, and he’s not even the best villain in Titus! It would be one thing if Junior was supposed to be more realistic, but he’s not. He’s just a hammy villain like the rest of them. And he is no the guy from Titus. Sorry bud.

So – there’s not great characters, there’s not great action, add those two together in a gladiator picture and what you get is not a great gladiator picture. No offense to my boys Harry and Mo over there at the ain’t it cool news but the chances of them still thinking this is better than Alien two years from now is the same chance of me getting to meet Abraham Lincoln.

What I mean is there is no chance. (Abraham Lincoln is dead, he was assassinated by John Wilkes Boothe I believe, in a balcony.)

I guess gladiating is pretty cool though if you think about it, thanks guys.

–Vern

This entry was posted on Monday, May 15th, 2000 at 8:16 am and is filed under Action, Drama, Reviews, Vern Tells It Like It Is. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

11 Responses to “Gladiator”

  1. Telling it like it is, even back then. I always thought this was overrated. I remember liking the fight scenes fine, but it’s not great just because it’s long. Guess I better check your Kingdom of Heaven review too.

  2. This is getting posted on my Facebook page. I’m sick of people treating this shitload of fuck like it’s a classic. Thanks Vern, as always, you are indeed the man.

  3. “Like the man was Clint Eastwood personified” That made me laugh, I like the idea that Eastwood is so fuckin cool he now exists only as some kind of abstract concept.

  4. Wow. It’s been 14 fucking years since you wrote this. You were right, but you wanna know what? I’m curious to know a) what you think of this movie now (because the post-action films have gotten worse, in my opinion) and b) what you think of Mel Gibson’s BRAVEHEART, which I cannot believe you haven’t reviewed ever.

    Oh, and congrats on not looking too faggy in real life.

  5. I was someone who liked GLADIATOR back in the day but the last time I put it on I lost interest about 1/3 of the way in. There were three Warrior/Epic related movies in the 90’s that I admired. This one, BRAVEHEART and THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS. BRAVEHEART and MOHICANS are the only ones I will return to now. There are similarities between William Wallace and Hawkeye that really appeal to me.

    – They both have codes of honor and didn’t base their life on gaining power so they could lord it over people.

    Wallace – Men don’t follow titles, they follow courage.

    Hawkeye – a white man raised by Mohicans, the Mohican way.

    – They fought for freedom from oppression and despised being ruled over.

    Hawkeye – I do not call myself subject to much.

    Wallace – They can take our lives, but they can never take our freedom.

    – They both knew how to pursue a womans heart.

    Wallace – I love you, always have.

    Cora – What are you looking at?
    Hawkeye – I’m looking at you, miss. (note the intention of both these statements. Can be read as – I want you and only you – or, – You will be in my bed before the day is out (or both).

    – They didn’t back down from a fight or threat, and even provoked fights to get the party started.

    Hawkeye – Someday you and I are going to have a serious disagreement

    Wallace – Put your head between your legs and kiss your own ass. (personal favorite).

    I haven’t been game to watch the directors cut of MOHICANS yet because I would hate for my memory of the original to be tarnished. The final chase and fight between Magua and Chingachgook, then Magua and Hawkeye, set to that awesome music is just goose-bump inducing cinematic joy.

  6. Amendment to participants in Mohicans final battle – Hawkeye was not present. Magua vs Unca + Magua vs Chingachgook was the lineup. Hawkeye was off with Cora somewhere.

    Note for future updates to Badass Top 100 – Chingachgook belongs at least in the top 20.

  7. If you wonder why Chingachgook belongs in the Top 20, watch his final fight with Magua. Hell, watch the whole damn movie. He might be old but he’s swift, brutal and unforgiving. Up there with Kitano and Clint. Total Mohican badass.

  8. So I come here to post some rando thoughts on GLADIATOR: BACK TO THE COLLISSEUM, take a peek at this review and go…Holy Shit! Vern2010 sure took a steaming dump on the original! Vern2010 also says “Faggy” twice in his review. I’ll just about concede to Vern2010 the action has way too many cuts and edits for my liking. But crapping all over the 2nd highest grosser of 2010, a 5 Oscar-winner including Best Actor and Best Picture, a movie that almost single handedly revived interest in the “Sword and Sandal” genre, turbo charged by a powerhouse Crowe performance and a creepily unhinged Phoenix, and a movie I watch at least twice every year? Well…to paraphrase Marine Gunnery Sergeant Tom Highway in HEARTBREAK RIDGE…Vern2010 and I won’t be having warm showers together in the wee hours of the morning anytime soon.

    So anyway..GLADI-2-ATOR: If you can accept a sequel which can in no way top the original, something the film itself easily concedes in how shamelessly it rides the coat-tails of the original, ripping off plot points, iconic catch phrases and even musical cues, if you can make peace with the fact that Crowe and Phoenix radiated more menace in their little pinkies than this film’s gladiator hero and twin pairs of powdered, pantomime clown emperors have in their entire bodies…well then, this flick’s a hoot.

    At 86 years old, Scott hasn’t lost his flair for staging epic action sequences, and while there’s an air of earnestness that permeates every one of his past historical epics, here Sir Ridley is in full on “Fuck it, let’s just go berserk” mode…so you have weird looking CGI monkeys, CGI rhinos, a flooded Coliseum with sharks(!), a bi-sexual Denzel Washington chewing scenery and tons of hand to hand combat, most of them shot with the type of clarity that should bring a smile to Vern2010. The film’s plot doesn’t bear scrutiny for any span of time longer than a minute, events are rushed through, character motivations are either unexplained or turn on a dime (was Sir Ridley forced to trim this and are we due an extended 5 hour version in 6 months?)

    Go for the action and spectacle. And pretty much nothing else.

  9. Sorry about the language. I can’t re-read this but I do intend to rewatch the movie hopefully before the sequel. I’m sure the action won’t seem as bad now. That was a new thing at the time, to edit action incomprehensibly. I’m harder to shock now.

  10. Absolutely nothing to apologize for Vern. I’ve used words and phrases in my youth that make me cringe now. We’re all works in progress and differences of opinion aside, I kinda enjoyed the snarkier tone in these early reviews. Not sure how much of the action of the original may seem more acceptable now on re-watch, but the sequel really fixed that problem, IMHO.

  11. I’m not prejudging GLAD2ATOR, but I have to admit that most of Ridley Scott’s historical epic films since the original GLADIATOR have left me cold and/or underwhelmed – they all see so much the same and generic – almost pay check cashers or ‘legacy’ extenders. I want more of THE COUNSELOR or HOUSE OF GUCCI.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>