"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Havoc

HAVOC is the long-anticipated, straight-to-Netflix fifth film of Gareth Evans, director of the 21st century classic THE RAID. It contains plenty of the brutal, incredible action you’d hope for from such an artist, but it’s a different type of movie, an atmospheric and stylized (but also ridiculously violent) noir about a deadbeat homicide detective whose claim to heroism is that he’s the one guy in a circle of corrupt cops who felty guilty after they executed an undercover cop during a robbery. Now he has no friends or family and he does dirty deeds for a powerful real estate mogul but if he performs this one difficult task he can be out from under his thumb forever. And in the process he might sort of do the right thing for once.

His name is Patrick Walker (Tom Hardy, THE DROP), and he’s introduced buying his daughter (Astrid Fox-Sahan, Young Wallander) last minute Christmas gifts at a mini-mart, then being annoyed that the clerk won’t wrap them for him. So we get it when his wife (Narges Rashidi, UNDER THE SHADOW) won’t let him come over. (I’m unclear if this starts on Christmas Eve, actual Christmas, or what.)

It’s filmed in Wales, but set in an unnamed American metropolis that has a bit of the imposing gloom of a Gotham City or THE CROW’s Detroit, the grime of THE RAID’s Jakarta, the visual detail of YEAR OF THE DRAGON’s Chinatown, and the brazen hyperviolence of PREDATOR 2’s Los Angeles. I’ve heard a few people compare this to SIN CITY, and it looks much more real and literal than that, but there’s definitely some of that pulpy exaggeration, including cars that look normal but seem to run on rocket engines. There’s a painterly look to some of it (cinematographer: his usual guy, Matt Flannery) that reminds me of those days I miss when it was more important for movies to look cool than real, when an artificial-looking shot could be praised for its style instead of burned at the stake for cinema sinning. I don’t care if this uses the devil’s computer generated imagery or not – it manages to have real grit and grain while reminding me of the days of soundstages and matte paintings. I will always believe that it is cool for a movie to look cool. It’s just how I was raised.


I guess I had to bring that up now because I have an inkling that at least a few of my fellow action hardcores have objected to the absolute knock-you-on-your-ass truck chase and shootout near the beginning, on account of they’re moving so fucking fast and the feats and camera moves are so spectacular that you can sense there’s some type of digital stuff going on somewhere, somehow. For me it’s one of the most gut-tightening non-MAD-MAX vehicle chases I’ve seen in years. A crew of young people in fluorescent light-up masks have stolen a semi and are tearing through streets and highways with the back door swinging open and various cop cars on their ass. The kids come up with this idea to throw a washing machine into the windshield of a cop car, and I don’t know about you, but I laughed. A good action movie moment. Then they get away and we stay behind with the police cruiser as other officers (including Timothy Olyphant [A PERFECT GETAWAY] as Vincent) arrive to find their friend crushed. Then the doom sinks in. Fun’s over.

(idea: recut that whole sequence to “Neutron Dance”)

The washing machines were full of cocaine, and the heist was a desperate ploy by Charlie Beaumont (Justin Cornwell, JINGLE JANGLE: A CHRISTMAS JOURNEY) to get his girlfriend Mia (Quelin Sepulveda) out of debt from stealing a car belonging to douchey neck-tattooed Triad boss Tsui (Jeremy Ang Jones, THE OUTPOST). But while they’re making the drop off some other guys in demonic hockey masks storm in and massacre Tsui and all his men. Charlie escapes but his face is seen on a security camera, which is a problem for his dad, and Walker’s boss, Lawrence Beaumont (Forest Whitaker, BLOODSPORT), who’s running for mayor. So Walker’s mission is to find where Charlie ran to and keep him safe from the gangsters who think he killed Tsui and the cops with their separate grudges.

Walker gets dropped from his case, all the better to chase the kid, sometimes with reluctant help from his younger, by-the-book-er partner Ellie (Jessie Mei Li, LAST NIGHT IN SOHO). Meanwhile Mia tries to get fake passports from her uncle Raul (Luis Guzmán, CROCODILE DUNDEE II), which is really good news because it means there’s gonna be a scene where Tom Hardy interrogates Luis Guzmán. This is what movies are for. How is this the first time?


Tsui’s mother (Yeo Yann Yann, ILO ILO) is just called “Tsui’s Mother” in the credits, but Ellie says her name is Clarice Fong, and she’s clearly a powerful gangster who “traveled halfway around the world to identify my son.” She arrives in town surrounded by serious, scary motherfuckers ready to enact cold-blooded vengeance on her behalf. One sign that this is the type of action movie I love is that one of these henchpeople immediately catches your eye by having cool blond hair under a hoodie under a leather jacket and getting a big entrance where she gets out of a car right after Fong and they walk to face each other and just nod. Later she nimbly jumps off a motorcycle in traffic and causes some trouble. She never has dialogue or even a name, she’s just “the assassin,” played by MMA fighter (and stunt double for Kristen Wiig in MACGRUBER) Michelle Waterson. Any time she appears you know somebody’s gonna get fucked up, building to a long one-on-one with Walker, and no, it does not seem unfair that she’s a woman fighting a beefy brawler dude. He seems like the underdog. I’m not saying it’s as good as the Mad Dog fight in THE RAID, but it has that kind of energy. An instant classic.


I’m a Tom Hardy partisan, and this has what you want from a Tom Hardy role: a tough guy accent, lots of belligerent grunting and muttering, numerous expressions and lines and sounds that are really funny and probly wouldn’t be the way anybody else would do them.

Also it’s a very physical role, even using some of his martial arts experience. Most of the action is chaotic, disorienting, even impressionistic at times, but it has a rhythm and momentum to it the carries you along and makes it exhilarating. The action designer/stunt coordinator is Jude Poyer, and I noticed the second unit director was FRONTIER(S) director Xavier Gens, both veterans of Evans’ show Gangs of London (as are many of the people here).

I think this is a pretty compelling take on familiar story elements, if overly convoluted for its relative simplicity, but I understand people being less into it than me. What’s undeniable is that Evans catapults his numerous factions of criminals into a high volume of absolute top shelf mayhem. There are little bits like when Walker throws a guy head first through the little window on a door, then the door swings open while he’s still hanging on it…


…as well as epic, escalating bloodbaths like what happens when he tracks Mia to a dance club but she doesn’t want to go with him and then the corrupt cops show up and then the Triads show up and then her friends show up and then other cops show up. He’s sliding across the floor (the RISKY BUSINESS maneuver), does a flying drop kick out of nowhere, uses a metal pipe like a sword, Mia uses a champagne bucket and bottle as weapons, then steals a guy’s hatchet and goes to town. We get shots looking up through a glass floor, people getting sliced and diced and tossed over balconies and down stairs, and that’s all before it turns into HEAT for a while. I love how the battle moves through various corners and tunnels of the club and then back onto the street and when they get away we stay behind with the assassin and can hear bullets still popping off in multiple directions, little deadly skirmishes still going on that we don’t even have to know about.

By the way, if not for the massacre, that cover charge of five bucks would be a good deal for getting into Club Medusa! Especially considering the professionalism of the DJ to keep the beats bumping the whole time (unless that’s the score by Evans’ usual composer Aria Prayogi).

The other in-itself-more-exciting-than-the-entirety-of-the-average-action-movie sequence is in the exact opposite setting – instead of the lights and artifice of a huge dance club in the city it’s a small, rustic cabin in the woods, where Evans and Poyer manage to find even more varieties of thrilling cinematic savagery. In a just world this would be in contention for sound design awards considering its symphony of slashings, bodies and structures being torn apart by bullets, blood splorching and splishing and sssissssing. You’re in the middle of it, all around you are sounds of panting, yelling, grunting, screaming, feet stomping, people being shot and kicked and thrown through walls and windows, heads banged against metal and wood and glass. And most of all the gunfire – this kinda seems like Evans’ version of HARD BOILED level overkill, but I like that Evans does not take the “bullet ballet” approach. There is no grace here. This is barbarity.

That said, John Woo and heroic bloodshed must’ve been on his mind. There’s a bond between enemies (Fong and Beaumont have a solemn conversation about their kids), a hospital assassination, and of course all the characters are taking advantage of an all-you-can shoot bullet special throughout.

I don’t think it’s fair to hold HAVOC up to THE RAID, but also, honestly, I don’t think it makes out too terribly in that comparison. I prefer the more martial arts based action of the former, and its compact-as-a-god-damn-diamond plot is more unusual and more successful at what it’s doing than this collection of crime movie tropes. But not for one second does this feel like a watered down, Hollywood-ized Gareth Evans. The action soars far beyond any non-WICK American output, feeling more of a piece with his associate Timo Tjahjanto’s Indonesian Netflix masterpieces. And yet it’s not a copycat, it’s doing its own thing with its high-production-value setting and technique, and by being a vehicle for Hardy’s character-actor-in-a-leading-man-role theatrics; sweating, grunting, doing an accent and being a fuck up but showing in his eyes that he feels his failure deep and wants desperately to get one important thing right.

Three of the central characters are largely defined by blowing it as parents. Fong’s version of making it up to her kid is making the wrong person suffer for his death. Beaumont’s version is (SPOILER) impulsively jumping in front of the bullets meant for his son. Our hopes for the future are for Charlie and Mia to get the fuck out of this godforsaken city (and country), and for Walker’s daughter to not have to think about him too much. I like the bleak subversiveness of offering up the type of story where our protagonist usually makes some small gesture to redeem himself in the eyes of his kid and/or wife, then never even letting him see them.

In the last moments (LAST MOMENTS SPOILER), when Ellie says she’ll “bring it” to his daughter I thought for a second she meant she found some cache of money, but of course his wife has already rejected that sort of thing, and all Ellie really meant was the shitty toys Walker bought the kid for Christmas. His last line that he doesn’t want to ruin her Christmas is a grimly humorous admission of his own loserdom. And yet he’s doing something less glamorous but more honorable than going out in a blaze of glory: he’s turning himself in, no longer going around committing more crimes to get away with previous crimes, like most of the other characters in the movie. That he has the dignity of taking responsibility for his actions is not a silver lining, but maybe a sickly, piss-colored one, like yellow street lights on grey snow in the aftermath of a gun massacre.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 30th, 2025 at 3:00 pm and is filed under Reviews, Action, Crime. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

23 Responses to “Havoc”

  1. Vern, you stay killin this shit. I still haven’t seen SINNERS, but ACCOUNTANT and this are also on my list. I can’t match the pace of your watching, let alone your reviewing. Respect!

  2. Great review. I thought this was great and the nightclub sequence is an all-timer. Lots of great little touches in that sequence (and the cabin sequence, too), like the blood smearing on the glass floor when the

  3. I felt like this was Evans paying homage to John Woo, mainly, and the HK action classics of the 80s and 90s.

    People shoot and hit other people while sliding on different surfaces, everyone is a goddamn action hero, guns never run out of ammo, no one dies of a single shot (to kill someone here you need a full clip, and sometimes that’s not even enough). Squibs blow up on bodies and scenery all over, and yeah, a few touches like the empathy between the two ‘evil’ parents.
    Sure, it’s grimier, more chaotic, and not as operatic as Woo’s stuff, but it still feels to me like a conscious tribute to him in a way that, say, none of the John Wicks or the first Raid ever were.

    I’m still digesting it, still buzzing slightly… this had so many moments that made me laugh appreciatively. I’m not a huge fan of the plot-heavy middle section, but I didn’t mind it either, and I found it amusing how almost every single scene ends up with someone getting shot or stabbed.

    Anyhow – great review. WARFARE, SINNERS, and now this… Amazing.

  4. I thought HAVOC was a blast. That first shot of the (virtual) camera zooming past the cop cars up to the truck was all I needed to get on board right away. It’s just like Vern says, it’s more important to look cool than real. The Literalism Pandemic is still spreading, as evidenced by how many comments I’ve already passively absorbed shunning this movie for the crime of looking awesome. I don’t get it. My first thought when this was over was the no-nonsense seal of approval: “I want to see that again, right now.”

    One specific thing HAVOC does that made me pathetically grateful was that it made sure you can see everything in the night scenes. So often in movies made over the last ten years I scream at the screen, “It’s a MOVIE. TURN THE FUCKING LIGHTS ON!!” HAVOC’s stylisation ensured that all scenes were visible. Hallelujah. I particularly loved the deliberate digital over-exposure of all the visible lights in the shots while maintaining visibility in the rest of the frame. Gave the movie a distinctive hyperreal look without going into all-out comic book unreality.

  5. I threw this on not knowing anything about it or who was involved with it other than Tom Hardy and that it was an action flick. I’m sorry to say I’m one of those people that hated that first car chase. I thought it was incredibly ugly in it’s fakeness. But I was pretty quickly able to adjust my expectations from it being a “real” movie to more of a cut scene in a video game. Once I made that adjustment I had a blast.

  6. Glad to see you liked it as much or even more than I did Vern! That caption with subtitled Tom Hardy mumbling is pure gold. That opening camera move in the car chase made me feel like I had to buckle up! My wife and I were also instantly into Katherine Waterson’s assassin character. Mia is also a stealth MVP, I was genuinely surprised and delighted when she went into full ass-kicker mode out of nowhere (that bucket/bottle move!). The visuals/effects worked for me, everything had a unified unreal or hyperreal look that blended the real people with the digitally manipulated city, blood, and gunfire (I am not religiously opposed to those things, I just don’t like when they clash with the rest of the image or are crutches for lazy filmmaking). It allowed a level of choreographed chaos and camera movements that practical effects would not. I have a deep appreciation for practical effects (that I have even instilled in my 19-year old nephew during our movie watching), but even a lot of the stuff we love didn’t look “real,” like matte paintings, optical effects (lasers!) and plenty of make-up/creature effects etc. We became accustomed to their visual language and now we appreciate their tactile quality, but at the end of the day what really matters is what serves the movie, and is it cool or interesting? In this case it worked for this movie/setting and I thought it looked cool.

    more thoughts here:
    https://adamsoverduereview.wixsite.com/adam/post/havoc-2025

  7. Zeus’s Booger

    April 30th, 2025 at 9:43 pm

    Thank you for reviewing this film. I wouldn’t have known about it otherwise. Looking forward to sitting down it out with a cold drink and popcorn.

  8. Saw this last night, and I really liked it. I’m currently up to episode 4 in season 3 of GANGS OF LONDON, and while that world is a sort of realistic one, there are quite a few similarities between that show and HAVOC. Mostly in the way the story is told. Right now I think I prefer stories like this set in the real world (we have NO guarantees that people won’t start flying and being bulletproof in a world like the one in HAVOC), but who knows, Gotham lite could grow on me.

  9. Peter Campbell

    May 1st, 2025 at 3:09 am

    I really enjoyed this film. I have friends who don’t and I think some of this comes down to the first half, which I do think shows signs of reshoots. I get the sense that Hardy and Olyphant were even darker before Hardy’s redemption and they had to pull back a little on that to keep the audience onboard.

    But the b-movie noir soul and the action truly made up for the flaws. Even describing the action doesn’t do justice to its momentum and variations. It has peak Woo and Argento motivation of this sequence exists in this story because its experience is the point. It is tied to the story but is an end to itself, like a musical number. You don’t get that enough in films.

    One final note is that the opening car chase sequence had elements of Matrix Reloaded car chase before it reached the freeway in how it was zipping around and under bridges (as well as the finale of the old Don Siegal classic The Line-up) and the chase of the truck with contents coming out of it referred to both the beginning of Beverly Hills Cop and the opening of Speed 2 (not a film many get inspired by, he he he). And of course, Robocop, where they used a man rather than a washing machine.

  10. “Neutron Dance” playing over the opening truck chase made me laugh. “Shakedown” works too.

  11. “here’s a painterly look to some of it (cinematographer: his usual guy, Matt Flannery) that reminds me of those days I miss when it was more important for movies to look cool than real, when an artificial-looking shot could be praised for its style instead of burned at the stake for cinema sinning.”

    THIS!!!

    If I didn’t think plagiarism is for losers, I’d rip this line off wholesale and fling it at those nimrods filling reviews with their rancid critiques that “it uses too much CGI” and “it’s ridiculous that the guns never run out of bullets”

    Tell me you don’t really watch a lot of action movies without saying you don’t really watch a lot of action movies.

  12. I have not yet read the review or other comments. Also, I have not seen any of Gareth Evans’s prior work.

    I have made to around the 1-hour mark or just past the stretch witht he big fighting set piece in the club and then Forest Whitaker and his wife stuck in traffic — and I have thoughts.

    Tom Hardy is surprisingly … kind of annoying. This is indeed a surprise, b/c Hardy in general and Hardy beating people up in particular was what garnered my interest. I was discussing this out loud with a friend, trying to put my finger on what bugged me about Hardy, and it’s that he talks too damn much in this, and his mumble-y fast-talking banter doesn’t work for me at all. His dialogue has faint notes of being over-written, and there’s too much of it. Also, he is going for kind of a b-boy white boy meets hard-case corrupt East Coast cop vibe, and it doesn’t really work for me. To be clear, it’s not like bad bad, but it’s a mildly annoying mixed bag, as opposed to the unalloyed good I was anticipating.

    The aesthetic is uneven. The on-the-ground walking and being in buildings is mostly fine, but all the establishing, pan-out type shots and chase shots are distractingly cartoony. It’s almost a graphic novel type aesthetic, and I can’t tell if that’s intentional, and I don’t think it would be better even if that is the case. The CGI blood and machete action is terrible. Not terrible because it’s CGI per se, terrible because it’s just cartoony and goofy, exaggeratedly leaning into its CGI. I personally find teh ACR on this to be all over the place. Some stuff is very clean and satisfying, like people getting put through door windows or smacked around, but then a lot of stuff — especially the machete or blade action — is simply awful. And I think the chase scenes look terrible for the most part. That club scene did nothing for me.

    Timothy Olypant also seems all wrong for this. Thin, pretty, soft-spoken. It’s weird. Luis Guzman is a standout, as always, and I love Ghost Dog in most anything, so, he’s solid too.

    I’ll still finish it, I think. Maybe I’ll moderate.

  13. Glaive Robber

    May 3rd, 2025 at 7:43 pm

    Genuine classic Vern review. I very much enjoyed this movie, but it seemed like it was in post-production for two years? Anyone know what happened? Maybe the stylized effects replaced unusable footage or something? I couldn’t figure out why it took so long for this to show up on streaming. ADR?

    Also, the music in the club during the big brawl scene fifty mins in was a couple tracks from Gesaffelstein, a well-known German dance artist. His stuff has been used in a lot of movies, and the songs they played were at least a decade old. Even when it seems like Hollywood is trying to be cool, they’re actually ten years behind.

  14. https://thefilmmakerspodcast.com/gareth-evans-havoc-the-raid-and-gangs-of-london-director-and-writer-on-his-process/

    Here is a podcast episode where Gareth Evans explains what happened with the long post production. It was a combination of COVID, scheduling conflicts, and the actors’ strike that delayed the required reshoots for two and a half years.

    I really liked this film. Someone somewhere said that this is the best Max Payne film we will ever get, and I couldn’t get that out of my head while watching. There’s a lot of the feel of the first Max Payne in this film, with the action film noir story in a snowy city, corrupt cops, and John Woo gunplay. I wonder if it was an inspiration.

    As a Finn, one of the reasons I was looking forward to this was that one of the many special effects companies that worked on this film is Troll VFX, which is from here, and this is their first foreign work. I’d love to know what exactly they worked on. There’s surprisingly a lot of CGI in Havoc. The first car chase and a lot of the city in the background are obviously CGI.

  15. Dreadguacamole

    May 4th, 2025 at 7:37 am

    Here’s a fun (very fluffy) piece on how he went about turning several different locations in Wales into a Gotham-like city:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crld19j1ld4o

    This one goes a bit more in-depth, with some comparison shots:

    https://www.atlasofwonders.com/2025/04/havoc-city-filming-location.html

    Goes to show how much digital scaffolding there is around even ordinary shots…

  16. That Max Payne comparison is very on point. The florid opening voiceover, the gritty stylized city, the perhaps-a-little-too-complicated crime noir plot. And Ellie’s go-to move is the full body dive forward while shooting a bunch of times in the air, she does that several times.

  17. I didn’t hate this, but I can’t quite see it as a modern classic either. I’d put it a bit below Evans’s other Netflix movie APOSTLE, although this is in fact more my speed. I guess if you have the star and director of the best couple of action movies of the century, expectations are going to be high, and I really tried to temper mine. I liked the Woo-ness of it all and the nightclub sequence definitely delivers on that, but elsewhere – the hospital, the house in the woods – it rather teases than delivers.

    I love that it was filmed in South Wales, although part of me wishes Hardy had gone with his Welsh accent from LOCKE. And perhaps having him called Walker was intended as a nod to Lee Marvin in POINT BLANK, but Patrick Walker sounds like a high school principal. What was wrong with Detective John Havoc? Top work on Luis Guzman as Uncle Raul though!

  18. So between this and MONKEY MAN I guess shakycam’s cool again.

    I want to like this movie. It’s admirably vicious, and there are a few dozen good action beats buried in the digital slop. But it’s hideously ugly to look at and there isn’t a single character worth giving a fuck about. I don’t even know who’s killing who half the time and I don’t particularly care. It’s trying so hard to be kinetic that nothing registers. It’s just noise and flash. Watchable, slick, but there’s nothing here to hold onto.

  19. I had quite the good time with it. Okay, when we hit the 40 minute mark and so far the only action scene was the opening car chase, I was a bit disappointed, considering who the director is, but I quickly adjusted to the realization that it’s a corrupt cop thriller first and an action movie second. And then the nightclub scene really elevated the movie, because it was not just a pile of escalation, it also was a “In case you still had any doubt, we are not going for realism here” moment. Nobody ever had to reload, even middle aged cops and random teenagers (?) were able to stand their ground against trained Yakuza hitmen in hand to hand combat and no matter how big the bullet storm got,the pro- and antagonists only received more than a few scratches if they were nameless cannon fodder or it was time for them to die. I’m sure quite a few assholes sat in front of their TV and thought it made the movie bad, but no,it made it only better!

    My main problem with the action scenes was the lighting and the colour palette though. It was just pretty dark. Not “I can’t see what is going on”-dark, like so many other movies and TV shows these days, but I felt having a small army fight in badly lit rooms where everything was brown, black, grey and amber, no matter if it was a cabin in the woods at night or a populated night club, was not Evan’s best choice. The shakycam however didn’t bother me. That was just typical Gareth Evans stuff. Sure, I would’ve preferred the “You can clearly see what is going on” approach of JOHN WICK and co, but just in the THE RAIDs, the camera was shaking, but in control and let us see the good stuff. But better lighting would’ve indeed helped.

    That said: This is a movie that I would buy in physical form, but probably not rewatch a lot. As entertained as I was, not even the action scenes had the “Oh shit, this will be on my Best Of list by the end of the year! It was good, but not THAT good. And that is a bit disappointing, considering how well everything came together here.

  20. i knew the discourse on this was going to be annoying because a) its not another raid b) its incredibly stylized but in a unique and unexpected way and c) its not another raid. i do not understand the complaints about the CG in the car chases – obviously my brain perceived there were digital effects at play but everything moved so right and had weight to it and the physics “made sense” in a way that it didnt bother me at all? kinda like the CG in pacific rim or something like that it just feels right even when you know its completely fantastical. anyway i fucking loved it and if you cant see whats going on in the action scenes your homework is to rewind them and watch them again.

  21. I wonder if the effects issue is an international thing, particularly since Gareth Evans is Welsh, though has done a lot of work in Indonesia.
    International movies now have some of the same technology as they do in America, and the effects in bigger foreign films results in some wild, elaborate visuals, with bright colors showing no regards for, say, shadowing. So you watch these big budget foreign films and you see stuff you’ve never seen before. Whereas in America, studios are spending $300 million because “we have to make Darkseid look ‘realistic!'”

  22. I have to agree with Mr Majestyk. I didn’t feel a thing about those scared youngsters/robbers and their love story – hard to believe that softies like this crew (including one non-binary as it seemed) could be in debt to Triad and commit robberies.
    WHY shootouts like these needed so shallow and cliche plot is beyond me. But I had a trick for a second viewing: watch it like I watch 80s action movies – and voila, entertaining as hell and plot didn’t matter at all.

  23. Finished it, and my overall impression didn’t changed, but I thought the fight inside the cabin with the harpoon was decent.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>