"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

The Invasion (second review)

THE INVASION (2007) is the fourth (and final, the way civilization is going) official movie adaptation of Jack Finney’s The Body Snatchers. I actually reviewed it for The Ain’t It Cool News when it came out, which is one way I can prove it exists. It’s documented! Anyway I after I watched the other three I figured I oughta complete the set.

This one stars A-listers Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig and is the Hollywood debut of acclaimed German director Oliver Hirschbiegel (DAS EXPERIMENT, DOWNFALL), as well as the first movie written by David Kajganich, who later wrote A BIGGER SPLASH, SUSPIRIA and BONES AND ALL for Luca Guadagnino. But it was kind of a fiasco, losing money and getting poor reviews, universally considered the weakest of the four versions. I’m sure we would’ve noticed it was kinda sloppy even if it hadn’t been widely reported that producer Joel Silver thought it wasn’t working and spent $10 million on reshoots written by the Wachowskis and directed by their guy James McTeigue (V FOR VENDETTA, NINJA ASSASSIN). It was delayed over a year and moved from a confident June release to a resigned August one.

And, would you believe it? It doesn’t really work. But it has its moments.

Kidman (BMX BANDITS) stars as Dr. Carol Bennell, a psychiatrist whose workaholic ex-husband Tucker (Jeremy Northam, THE NET) suddenly wants to spend time with their son Oliver (Jackson Bond, KILLER MOVIE), which is not like him. Uh oh. Tucker is a director at the CDC and was on the scene to see (and accidentally touch) the alien spores found on wreckage from a crashed Space Shuttle, so that might have something to do with it.

In this version, I’m afraid, there are no pods. It kinda makes more sense, because the plants infect you and reprogram your DNA, they don’t have to make a copy. And it’s still gross – it grows a slimy layer over your face when you fall asleep. But, #1, I like pods. #2, since we don’t have pods we don’t get to deal with all the fun stuff like the original bodies disintegrating, or encountering their duplicates, or being thrown in the garbage. But the most important reason this is a downgrade is that when they say “my husband is not my husband” it’s not even true. He’s actually the same guy. And can get better, it turns out! He’s just sick. That’s just not as thrilling of a scenario, in my opinion.

Like the doctors in all versions, Carol hears from a patient who believes a loved one is not her loved one. I like that this woman Wendy is played by Veronica Cartwright, and it’s not just a cameo, maybe even a bigger character than she played in the 1978 version. Although she describes a clearly dangerous situation with her husband (Adam LeFevre, JUNGLE 2 JUNGLE), Carol prescribes her pills, seeming just as clueless as the doctor giving pills to the kid in the ’56 version. But she very firmly tells her to call if she’s in trouble, I guess that’s supposed to show her concern.

Later there’s a good scene where Wendy’s husband shows up at Carol’s office looking for her. It’s kinda working on two levels because we know he’s a plant person but from Carol’s point-of-view it’s a dicey abusive stalker type scenario, which is also scary.

The other movies based on this story are all scarier and better for October viewing, but this one actually takes place partly on Halloween. Carol and her friend (Susan Floyd, BIG NIGHT) take the kids trick-or-treating, and the friend’s kid (who by the way has been emotionally distant) gets attacked by a dog and just calmly holds his mouth shut. Also Oliver finds a weird slimy membrane thing while going through his candy, which Carol brings to her biologist best friend/car pool buddy Ben (Craig, LARA CROFT: TOMB RAIDER) and he gets it tested by his colleague Stephen (Jeffrey Wright, Young Indiana Jones and the Mystery of the Blues).

I should mention that there’s more to the dog scene. Dogs can detect these fuckers and will growl at them, just like they do for Terminators. It’s one of the reasons they’re called man’s best friend. Maybe the most shocking alien behavior in the movie is when Wendy’s husband snaps their dog’s neck and casually carries him out to the garbage. This isn’t something we see, it’s a story we hear, but later while fleeing in a car Carol knocks over some garbage cans and a dead dog flies out – so this is something many of them do! (I think this one was in the recycling.)

Also, as I put it in my original review, “they’re facepukers.” Rather than going through all the trouble of harvesting and delivering pods, they just go around puking in your face to infect you. (No, there is not a scene where the heroes spy on the people of the town filling up trucks with puke to distribute to other towns.) The reveal of this is actually one of the best moments of weirdness – at a CDC conference some of the catering staff keep turning around unnaturally and then you see that it’s because they’re puking in the coffee.

Another new element to this adaptation is that everyone’s talking about an extra-powerful strain of the flu going around, and CDC director Tucker announces a supposed inoculation, raising suspicions about how they could already have one. This, of course, feels different after Covid. Back then it was a scary idea for a sci-fi conspiracy, now it’s a thing widely believed by ignorant people and responsible for many deaths. Fortunately the non-alien people in the government (spoiler for the movie THE INVASION) later come up with a cure and save everybody. But not through a vaccine, through dumping chemicals from above, like the naturopathic cure in Seagal’s THE PATRIOT.

Luckily Carol, Ben and Stephen haven’t gotten the shot yet or drank the vomit coffee, they’re on the ground floor thanks to the trick-or-treating sample, and have been cagey about telling the higher ups. When Ben’s Russian ambassador friend Yorish (Roger Rees, THE SCORPION KING) gets sick they witness a transformation first hand and become a band of uninfected trying to save the world. But the main thrust of the movie is Carol trying to rescue her kid from her ex. Also, she briefly made out with Ben but she called it off to protect the friendship and he’s very hardcore about helping her save Oliver, I think he’s auditioning to take it to the next level.

There are people freaking out in traffic trying to get help. There’s car action and running on streets and riding the subway. There’s a good amount of walking around in public trying not to emote or sweat. I like the moments where strangers clandestinely give each other tips about it. And there are lots of creepy stares and head turns from people who obviously ain’t right, plus one incident of weird crawling.

As always, our protagonist has to find ways to stay awake, but Carol doesn’t have access to a Mr. Coffee. Instead she breaks into a drugstore (already looted, though this is not established as a widespread phenomenon) where she’s able to use her pharmaceutical knowledge to find the right pills as well as chug a 2 liter of Mountain Dew. And she makes her kid give her an adrenaline shot to the heart!

It also follows in the tradition of the Siegel and Kaufman versions by having the protagonist dressed way too nice for what’s going on. In those cases it was men wearing suits and ties, as was the culture at the time. Here she’s wearing a nice sweater, skirt and heels while escaping through a subway tunnel.


It’s kind of funny that this famous story of resisting conformity stars two of the most beautiful people on the planet. I mean, how can the same person play the last hold out of the body snatchers and a Stepford Wife without really changing her look? I don’t know, but she’s good, she makes it work.

I appreciate that this version goes a little harder than the others in showing cops as enforcers of the alien agenda. They’re going around violently arresting people who haven’t complied yet. They don’t hint at this at all but in my opinion there’s a very good chance that most of those cops aren’t even infected, they’re just doing their job, and enjoying it.

The biggest update is portraying this more as a pandemic than an alien invasion. That’s how they try to make it feel real. But what are they saying? I had a sinking feeling that it was an anti-psychiatric drugs message, comparing medicine that balances your brain chemistry to alien spores that erase your emotions. It ultimately seems to back away from that, but a parallel is definitely drawn.

The more salient point is its acknowledgment of the possibility that a world of facepukers is in fact better than a world of humans. Wendy may miss the fights she used to have with her husband (because at least he had emotions) but we can’t really knock all the snatched world leaders ending their conflicts! We see news reports about nuclear disarmament treaties, occupations ending, George W. Bush shaking hands with Hugo Chavez, shit like that. So the ironic ending is that Ben and Carol figure out what causes immunity in about one minute of conversation, Stephen uses that to create a cure, everything is resolved very patly, the invasion is thwarted, the infected people who didn’t die even go back to normal, and Carol and Ben seem to be happily married. But also the status quo is restored as far as wars and shit, so Carol is left thinking “What have I done?”

The trouble is, when the facepukers created world peace earlier we already wondered what it meant to be fighting against that. So when the ending plays it like a real shocker of a conundrum that wouldn’t have occurred to you before it really doesn’t land right for me. But I like it intellectually.

Wikipedia refers to it as a “twist ending” devised by the Wachowskis. I had wondered earlier if they wrote the scene where Carol meets Yorish at a party, mainly because he asks, “Can a pill help me understand Iraq, or Darfur, or even New Orleans?,” pointed swipes at Bush that you didn’t expect to see in a big movie at that time. But also because it’s a fancy dinner with fancy people very pleased with themselves and their philosophical banter, like a bunch of Merovingians. I don’t know, the scene seems too big to have been a reshoot, but one of Yorish’s lines does repeat in voiceover to make the point at the end.

At the time, Entertainment Weekly cited “sources close to the production” saying the Wachowskis rewrote “some 30 percent of the movie.” It says “the Wachowskis’ fingerprints are hard to miss on the film’s extra-crunchy car-chase scenes and trippy time-warping jump cuts.” (I did notice propulsive quick cuts in those scenes that stand out from the rest of the movie.) Silver claimed the siblings “didn’t do more than help conceive and envision some action elements.” Hirschbiegel either was okay with the changes or did a good job of playing along. He’s quoted saying “some of their suggestions pissed me off because the pages were just better than what I had shot.”

I don’t think it comes across as a very Wachowski movie at all, but then you see the best action scene and of course it was their idea. Carol’s car gets mobbed by so many spore drones they create a blob of inhumanity on top of the vehicle. And she drives around trying to dump them, it’s crazy.

Back then you might’ve compared that scene to the “burly brawl” from THE MATRIX RELOADED, but now it reminds me of the fast zombie type sequence in THE MATRIX RESURRECTIONS. Whether consciously or not, I think Lana hung on to some of those ideas.

Although there’s some overlap, it doesn’t seem like it’s a matter of the MATRIX action unit moving over to this movie. David Leitch worked on it, but not Chad Stahelski. The stunt coordinator is Keith Adams (KILL BILL) and unfortunately Kidman was injured in a car stunt, like Thurman was.

I agree with the hive-mind that THE INVASION is the worst INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS movie – no question about that. But that’s not a huge insult. Not as good as the others doesn’t mean worthless. It’s kind of incoherent about what the plant people are actually about (for example, they are a hive mind, yet you can fool them into thinking you’re one of them). I also think the choice to go for a “realistic” look means it doesn’t have as much spooky atmosphere as the others, and makes some of the sillier parts stand out more. Like, I had trouble getting over a scene where they’re able to lock some facepukers in a drug store storage room using a latch lock on the outside of the door. For what possible purpose would they have built that? Who were they trying to keep in there? I’m sorry to bring this up so late in the review, but it’s been bothering me. Maybe there was a whole other horror movie going on in this drugstore before the invasion happened.

Despite these issues, I enjoy seeing variations on a good story, and this does take some of the creepy elements we enjoy and put a different spin on them. It got my heart pumping a few times, so I don’t mind that I watched it twice. If humanity should persist, we’re about due for another really good version. Probly a streaming series, though. Until then, we got three really good ones and this okay one.

Additional notes:

Oliver dresses as Superman for Halloween, but for some reason he wears a red domino mask. I was willing to accept it as a weird quirk that either he or Carol thinks Superman wears a mask, but then when I was making a screen grab of it I noticed another kid in the background doing the same thing! I’m so confused. We need a comic book nerd to lecture the wardrobe department.

Craig actually learned he’d be playing 007 while he was filming this, and the movie being postponed meant he was much more famous by the time it came out. Didn’t seem to help much, though.

I was happy to see one scene with Jeff Wincott (PROM NIGHT, MARTIAL LAW 2: UNDERCOVER, MISSION OF JUSTICE) as a transit cop, i.e. an alien. Also Malin Akerman is in a couple scenes as Tucker’s mistreated girlfriend, uncredited because this is before WATCHMEN and/or 27 DRESSES made her known. She had only been in three college movies (THE SKULLS, THE FRATERNITY and THE UTOPIAN SOCIETY) and HAROLD & KUMAR GO TO WHITE CASTLE.

One interesting fact about Hirschbiegel is that I’ve never seen DAS EXPERIMENT but I almost watched it specifically because it got him almost-hired to do the third BLADE movie. But then he decided to do DOWNFALL instead. Bummer. Ya blew it, Hirschbiegel.

 

 

This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 29th, 2024 at 7:13 am and is filed under Reviews, Horror, Science Fiction and Space Shit. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

23 Responses to “The Invasion (second review)”

  1. The sources about what went down behind the scenes with this differ. “30% Wachowski reshoot” sounds odd, considering that other sources say the movie got almost EXORCIST: DOMINION’d and therefore reshot almost completely, with Hirschbiegel only getting director credit for the final version because he was the more prestigious name at the time, while McTeague got a nice paycheck for not complaining about it. What everybody agrees on is that Daniel Craig originally had a smaller part, but in the gap between the first and 2nd shoot he was cast as James Bond, so they added more of him to capitalize on that.

    Back in the IMDb message board days someone who claimed to have seen the Hirschbiegel cut, called it “Like watching a disturbing documentary about the end of the world” and agreed that from a commercial POV the reshoots made sense, because this was more an arthouse movie than a blockbuster, which is something that I heard through the years a few times. Don’t know if they were all referring to the same IMDb post or were different people from the test screenings. Someone else claimed that Q-Tip appeared as leader of an anti-alien resistance in the last act, which supposedly had a claustrophobic but small scale action scene with a crowd of infected and uninfected people in a stairway, but I never heard anybody mention Q-tip’s participation either before or after release, so take that with a grain of salt.

    It’s been a long time since I saw it, but I agree with it being “Not as good as the others, but also still watchable”. Still, would’ve been cool if the S***** C** would’ve been such a global phenomenon that there would be a wave of restored director’s cuts and this would be one of them.

  2. Q-Tip leading a resistance! Wasn’t he dating Nicole Kidman for a while? Do I buy it, or do I just WANT to buy it?

  3. I love the first three versions of the body snatchers film (and also everyone should watch the Karloff film Body Snatchers. Its great.)

    But this one I hated. It was so dull to me, with no rhythm or sense of escalating horror. It felt one-note and as soulless of one of the pod people.

    Have enjoyed reading your views on the series on this series while not really commenting. I watched them all earlier in the year and would say each version gets a little weaker until the freefall in quality in this one. I have always found the first three irresistible.

  4. Yeah, this assessment seems about right! I really like Kidman in this, where she’s kind of like Viggo Mortensen in THE ROAD meets Nancy Thompson from ANOES meets Nicole Kidman being the best mom ever. But then I’m a Kidman-head, what can I say. Cartwright also is really good in her short role. Very affecting stuff. Craig seems pretty miscast or mis-directed or mis-something. Wright’s character seems to show up at weird and jarring points, like he’s edited into or out of things badly. Jeremy Northam seemed like a real nothingburger choice for the husband. I’m bored and underwhelmed by him in this. I think the creepy filmy goo transformations work pretty well in this, but I agree that you’re throwing away a lot of good body horror and general goo potential (contrast with the Ferrara version).

    Overall, I think this would be way worse without Kidman. She ups the resale value on this baby quite a bit, but it does have a lot of flaws, and I heartily agree that we deserve another one of these BODY SNATCHER films. Let’s go!

  5. Yeah, I’ve enjoyed this series too, although I’ve only seen, and revere, the first two movies. I’ve no real excuse for not watching the Ferrara version by now, but the combination of Kidman and Craig, and this film’s poor reputation have put me off this one. So thanks for boosting it here, Vern. I struggle to think of Kidman movies I really enjoyed, or indeed performances I liked – BIRTH, BEING THE RICARDOS, PADDINGTON(?) – but it’s hard not to admire her work ethic. However, I am a longtime admirer of Veronica Cartwright – in a just society we would celebrate her as a character actor on a par with, say Harry Dean Stanton – so there’s an incentive.

    I know when Vern reviewed THE HIDDEN Fred spoke up for THE PUPPET MASTERS, and I wonder if that might fit, at least thematically, here, and it has Donald Sutherland taking on the invaders again. It’s not Summer of 1994, but it was 30 years ago this week.

  6. By “Kidman head,” I really just mean that I’ve had a mild screen crush on her since about THE OTHERS, not that I’m anything like a completist (who could be?!). She’s good in EYES WIDE SHUT, also, I think. BIRTHDAY GIRL is not a great movie, but I like her in it. BIRTH is another good one, as you mention (haven’t seen either of those last two in over 20 years). Honestly, she’s so Nic Cage-tier prolific that I’ve probably seen less than 10% of her output, and I have not even pretended to keep up wih her in the streaming era and her foray into a million TV shows or mini-series (have not seen any of them) plus a million movies per year. There’s too much of it, and most of it is not up my alley. But when she’s in something I otherwise care to watch on genre or premise grounds, I typically like her; and she’s an acting highlight in this movie, where the performances are generally pretty uneven. In any case, though: Yes, Cartwright was great in this, I thought, though her role is closer to extended cameo to major supporting character. Still, she makes her mark.

  7. Kidman’s a weird case. In my head, I’m like, “Of course I like Nicole Kidman. Nicole Kidman’s great. Who doesn’t like Nicole Kidman?” But then I think, “Okay, smart guy, what’s your favorite Nicole Kidman movie?” And I’m like, “Uh…” As mentioned, she’s in so much stuff, but it’s just never stuff I want to see. Gun to my head, I’d say I hadn’t seen Nicole Kidman in anything since THE OTHERS, but then I remember that she’s in those AQUAMAN movies, and I guess that one Nic Cage joint (which must be the nexus of like a million rounds of Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon). I’ve probably seen her in less than ten things out of the hundreds she’s made. Like, I’d have to put BMX BANDITS in my top three Nicole Kidman joints.

    Then again, I’ve seen fewer Kermit the Frog movies, yet I consider myself a Kermit the Frog fan. So maybe it’s not about quantity.

  8. I have a pet theory that you only need to make five great movies to be great. And the best way to do that these days seems to be to do volume. But even then, I can’t get Kidman over that bar. I was almost sure I’d thought of another one I liked – was it MARGOT AT THE WEDDING? If we include this one, I feel like she has a lot of remakes under her belt – is MOULIN ROUGE a remake? – but of the ones I’ve seen they never match up to the original. THE SECRET IN THEIR EYES is fine enough, but Kidman can’t match the original and is in any case outshone by Julia Roberts, and who wanted a remake of THE STEPFORD WIVES? STOKER is at least a reimagining of SHADOW OF DOUBT, but it feels like a waste of everyone and serious watering down of what Park Chan-wook was doing in Korea. An interesting choice for Kidman though.

  9. BIRTH is probably the best Nicole Kidman film. I absolutely love STOKER but it’s more of a Mia Wasikowska showcase.

    Haven’t seen DAS EXPERIMENT in a while, but I remember it being really good. Still think of it every time I clean my toilet.

  10. There are some other Kidman joints that are supposed to be great performances, like KILLING OF A SACRED DEER or TO DIE FOR, so, I can’t speak to the five movies threshold. I think BIRTH, OTHERS, AND EYES WIDE SHUT are pretty great, and, as I’ve said, I’ve surely only seen like <10% of her output, and a decent portion of it is acclaimed, so, I mean. I think THE OTHERS alone puts her in the awesome category. Okay, off my oddly protective of a rich person I don't know b.s. now, I promise (fingers crossed).

  11. Doesn’t everybody like DEAD CALM? I thought that was a fairly beloved classic.

  12. I always think I like that one, but then I remember that I’m actually thinking of DEAD AGAIN and I’ve never seen DEAD CALM.

    I should though.

  13. I always think I like that one, but then I remember that I’m actually thinking of DEAD AGAIN and I’ve never seen DEAD CALM.

    I should though.

  14. Yeah, DEAD CALM and TO DIE FOR are movies I loved at the time and should revisit. The latter was definitely the one that made me think “oh shit, Dr. Chase Meridian is actually a great actress?” Another favorite for me that I don’t think anyone mentioned is Karyn Kusama’s DESTROYER, which I usually use as her credit when I don’t do BMX BANDITS. I tried to accurately describe her performance in my review – I don’t think it’s as authentic as they’re going for, but that almost makes it more fun to watch, like watching a daredevil try an impossible stunt.

  15. I dunno, it’s real easy for me to rattle off awesome Nicole Kidman movies. DEAD CALM, EYES WIDE SHUT, BIRTH, TO DIE FOR, THE NORTHMAN, PORTRAIT OF A LADY are all just off the top of my head. And she’s in maybe 265 “okay” movies. Maybe by volume the best actress of her generation? It’s definitely a possibility…

  16. Oh right. I saw THE NORTHMAN.

    I should not have seen THE NORTHMAN.

  17. grimgrinningchris

    October 30th, 2024 at 10:47 am

    There’s always the Kidman pees on Zac Efron movie, The Paperboy.
    Vern reviewed it, didn’t really like it a ton overall, but seemed kind of fascinated by it.

  18. I’ll concede DEAD CALM, which is a fun thriller nicely directed by Philip Noyce, but I don’t remember Kidman doing much.

    As to actresses of their generation, Sigourney Weaver is just about old enough to be Kidman’s mother, so maybe a different generation, but I will maintain that her quality control is just about the best of any working movie star, male or female. Even recently she did CALL JANE and MASTER GARDNER back to back. And she got an Oscar nomination for ALIENS, which we kind a forget now, and we certainly forget how unlikely that was then.

  19. Oh, and Weaver gets extra credit with me for her recurring cameo in Doc Martin, a gentle British TV dramedy.

  20. Kidman Top Ten

    10. Dead Calm/Stoker (depending on the mood!)
    9. Margot At The Wedding
    8. Rabbit Hole
    7. Paddington
    6. The Others
    5. The Killing Of A Sacred Deer
    4. Eyes Wide Shut
    3. To Die For
    2. Birth
    1. Dogville

    Special Mention: Cold Mountain… I think that one is romantic in an old-fashioned, bloated-Miramax sense.

  21. None of you Kidman heads mentioned MALICE? I can understand MOULIN ROUGE not being everyone’s cup of tea, but MALICE? (Chris Farley red-faced scream) C’MMMMONNNN!!!

  22. With Kidman you can’t discount the TV work. She’s fantastic in BIG LITTLE LIES and THE UNDOING. But even limiting it strictly to movies, I’ll give her MALICE, DEAD CALM, BIRTHDAY GIRL, TO DIE FOR, THE OTHERS, BIRTH, DOGVILLE, PORTRAIT OF A LADY, DESTROYER… THE NORTHMAN suuuuucked, but she was fantastic in it.

  23. Man, Warner Bros. REALLY doesn’t understand Superman. How could they let *two* masked Supermen slide like that?!

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>