"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

The Fantastic 4: First Steps

It took Marvel years to finally get back the movie rights to the team they call their “first family,” and then they had the bad luck to release THE FANTASTIC 4: FIRST STEPS two weeks after James Gunn’s SUPERMAN. It won’t matter in the long run, but right now you can’t miss the similarities in its approach: it’s light and stylized, it’s old timey, it skips over the origin story and gets right to it. It feels like a restart because it’s set in a different reality than the MCU and it’s the sixties – theirs has some flying cars, a race of mole people and possibly less racism. I believe they also got baby monitors and fist bumping early over there.

So in many ways it feels fresh for a Marvel movie. The retro-futuristic designs are very appealing, and it’s always nice when they have one that’s a visual experience. But I’m sorry to say it’s not nearly as fun or as funny as SUPERMAN, mostly a glossy surface with nothing but air beneath. I remember the idea of these characters from the 2005 movie – here are those ideas again, looking less embarrassing (love those turtleneck sweater uniforms!) but really not exhibiting much more depth than before.

Fuck the Fantastic 4, though – those entitled celebrities who live in a fancy building, take family trips to space and don’t even have to wait five years to get a fawning anniversary special on TV – the bad guys are the best part. They’re maybe even more simplistic than the heroes, but they’re just cooler. You got Galactus, devourer of worlds, you’ve seen the pictures. A giant space god with a huge purple helmet who comes to earth to eat it. He’s portrayed/based on Ralph Ineson (FIRST KNIGHT, THE GREEN KNIGHT, THE WITCH), who has a voice so low it actually could eat planets if it wanted to. Galactus doesn’t want to, I don’t think – this life seems to be a curse, with no space in it for pursuits of passion or culture. Too busy for hobbies, too transient for love, too large for jazz clubs. When he finds out there’s a baby on earth who has “the power cosmic” or whatever it’s great news because it means he can finally take this job and shove it on to some other schmuck. Maybe go to Vegas or something.

His “herald” is The Silver Surfer, Shalla-Bal, played by Julia Garner, an actress I really admire from WE ARE WHAT WE ARE, THE ASSISTANT, THE ROYAL HOTEL and APARTMENT 7A. (Also she was good in WOLF MAN even if I didn’t love the movie.) Is it the very best showcase of her skills to play a mocap/animated metallic naked alien lady? No, possibly not. Is she cool in it? Yes, definitely. She too is cursed, having sacrificed herself to save her family, now spending forever flying through space choosing which planets Galactus should eat and going there ahead of him to warn everybody they’re fucked and should go out and have a fun night or whatever while they can. She does it in a creepy voice but it’s kind of a nice service, I suppose. Thoughtful.

The animation of the Surfer is pretty cool – I like when she hits some Human Torch fire and they posed her like a real surfer riding a wave. When she heralds Galactus for the earth Johnny Storm (Joseph Quinn, OVERLORD) chases her into space and becomes intrigued by her. And I get it. I get it.

There were quite a few years when Marvel Studios seemed like miracle workers, turning the nerdiest shit into movies with undeniably broad appeal. I guess that’s why it’s no big deal that we have Galactus on screen (previously depicted only as a vague shadow). While creating a cinematic world where a giant purple guy is possible, they pushed things as far as they could. There was no way to go bigger than AVENGERS: ENDGAME, except to expand into uncountable hours of tie-in TV shows that spread things thin until almost nobody could follow the whole thing, the track record was spotty and even in the good ones the magic of the earlier movies wasn’t all there. Now each release has the burden of being the one that shows they’re back on track. I still haven’t gotten to CAPTAIN AMERICA: BRAVE NEW WORLD (if even I’m fatigued…), but THUNDERBOLTS* was pretty good. I love Florence Pugh as Yelena, I like the idea of the climactic battle involving all of their traumas so it’s personal. But is it a great story I remember, a distinct movie that I will revisit on its own like a BATMAN or X-MEN or THE SUICIDE SQUAD? No, not at all. It’s a pretty good episode.

FIRST STEPS has even more pressure on it because the ongoing series kinda needs exciting central characters in lieu of Tony Stark, Steve Rogers, Natasha Romanoff and T’Challa, but they haven’t figured out how to do Blade and forgot to bring back Shang-Chi. Weirdly instead of choosing a story that will try to sell us on why the Fantastic 4 are the characters who can fill that void they kinda act like this is part 3 or 4 in a series that has gotten stale and is desperate to find a way to mix things up. Shit, I don’t know – add a baby?

Like SUPERMAN it begins with the Fantastic 4 already powered and famous as super heroes, summarized in the aforementioned TV special. Unlike SUPERMAN this means most of their super heroing is in the past, relegated to quick glimpses in a montage or references in dialogue. There’s a good shot of the giant monster from the cover of FANTASTIC FOUR #1 and descriptions of a battle and peace talks with Mole Man (Paul Walter Hauser, RICHARD JEWELL), and then it’s okay, now what if the status quo you know and love from that opening 5-7 minutes were SHAKEN TO IT’S GOD DAMN CORE? Because the one thing Mr. Fantastic and the Invisible Girl never expected was TO BECOME PARENTS!!!!!!!

Can you imagine? Dealing with all the regular parenting stresses except Dad can stretch and Mom can invisible? They’re building the crib and everything except Dad gets in trouble because he has his robot H.E.R.B.I.E. do it. But on a more serious note what about the powers of the baby? It could be the chosen one and shit! That’s why Galactus offers to skip lunch today in exchange for just taking the baby. What an important baby! A powerful bloodline! A consequential lineage! Tune in next time, or the time after that, or whenever. This is only the first steps but there will be other steps I promise you. So important, this baby. Powers!

America’s sweetheart Pedro Pascal (THE GREAT WALL) has the most charisma of any screen version of Reed Richards. The character is fine. He makes him a more lovable square than the ’05 version. His wife Sue Storm (Vanessa Kirby, JUPITER ASCENDING) is to me the least interesting character, she’s very serious because she’s going to be a mother, she’s mad at Reed for being too analytical… I don’t know, as a non-parent I need to say that if this seems true and relatable to actual parents and they find it moving then obviously that’s who it’s for. From the outside it doesn’t seem like there’s a single detail beyond the exact standard issue new parent cliches out of an instruction manual. And you don’t have to have lived a movie for it to work, you know? ARE YOU THERE GOD, IT’S ME MARGARET made me cry about shit for pre-teen girls and their parents. This didn’t make me feel a thing. It made me think oh yeah you’re having a baby, let me give you a fuckin medal, nobody’s tried that before.

Johnny is played by Joseph Quinn, who I did not remember as the guy following Lupita around in A QUIET PLACE: DAY ONE. He’s emblematic of my problems with the movie because he’s fine, there’s nothing wrong with him, but there’s nothing exciting about him either. It’s not like THOR (a much worse movie from what I remember) where there’s this new guy Chris Hemsworth who really pops. Johnny has a subplot where on his own he researches and figures out important things, and it’s kind of cool, but it seems like it’s supposed to be a big surprising change from a less serious Johnny we never got to see. I suppose they can’t make him be a horny womanizer hooking up all the time like Chris Evans in the ’05 version, so instead they just have him state that he has a past of being like that. Okay, you used to be more fun to watch. Thanks for letting us know.


Of course it doesn’t help that Quinn just does not look right with his hair bleached and I never stopped thinking he looked like Freddie Prinze Jr. in the SCOOBY-DOO movies. As with Jessica Alba in the ’05 version they cast someone they apparently feel is right for the role but not enough to brush off internet comments saying “IN COMIC BOOKS HAIR IS YELLOW NOT MY FANTASTIC 4!!!!!!!!!”

The best part of this team is definitely Ben Grimm (Ebon Moss-Bachrach, STEALTH), street name The Thing. The orange rock monster is animated this time but he looks great, especially wearing his fedoras and giant shoes and shit. Unsurprisingly they play him very similar to Moss-Bachrach’s lovable curmudgeon character Richie on The Bear (which if you haven’t watched it I’m afraid I have to tell you that it’s exactly as great as everybody says. Makes me laugh and cry almost as much as Reservation Dogs). He acts exhausted with everything but he’s everybody’s buddy, he’s great with kids, even has a flirtation with a lady played by Natasha Lyonne (MODERN VAMPIRES) and unlike The Thing’s girlfriend in the ’05 movie or Lyonne’s character in BLADE: TRINITY she’s not blind. Just open-minded.

But the thing is there’s one scene where she talks to him and you get a vibe and another scene where he comes to see her as if they now have a relationship, and otherwise there is no relationship. Everything is minimal in this one.

I don’t want to sound too negative, I enjoyed the experience of watching the movie, but the more I think about it the weaker it seems. It feels like THE TREATMENT FOR FANTASTIC FOUR: THE MOVIE. You see what all the ideas they had were: these are the traits of each character, this is the type of stuff they do, this would be a funny joke if everybody wants Ben to say “It’s clobberin’ time!”, they could be forced to decide between protecting their baby and saving all life on earth as we know it, the parents could freak out the uncles by abruptly deciding it was okay to use the baby as bait.

It’s the bare minimum of all that stuff. It feels like they just hit each of those things but don’t develop anything, don’t let things flow out of it, don’t see where it goes. Just cross off the check list and go home.

For example the biggest conflict is Galactus’ offer to spare the earth if they give him their baby. Obviously they say no, and obviously the people of earth get upset when they hear that because it seems like a choice of give up your baby or give up all life on earth including the baby. But Sue makes a speech on the street saying well, I really love my baby that’s why I can’t give it up but I also love you guys I swear so I will try to save you. Then there’s a shot of one woman going from skeptical grimace to accepting smile and then everybody cheers and that’s it. This is really the barest bare minimum of exploring this idea, and the citizens seem like such dummies to need (and be instantly won over by) an explanation of why Sue would be conflicted about the situation.

The screenplay is credited to Josh Friedman (CHAIN REACTION, WAR OF THE WORLDS, TERMINATOR: DARK FATE, AVATAR: THE WAY OF WATER), Eric Pearson (THOR: RAGNAROK, GODZILLA VS. KONG, TRANSFORMERS ONE) and Jeff Kaplan & Ian Springer (BERT AND ARNIE’S GUIDE TO FRIENDSHIP), story by Pearson, Kaplan & Springer, and Kat Wood (ARTHUR & MERLIN). Director Matt Shakman comes from the world of television – Oliver Beene, Everwood, It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. They say part of the reason they chose him was that he showed them a picture of himself with his newborn baby (again – nobody’s ever been a dad before) but obviously his qualification was directing all of WandaVision, the first MCU show for Disney+ and still the most impressive in that it played with the television format and absolutely could not have just been a movie. Ironically maybe this one should’ve been TV – there’d be time for story and characterization on top of the bullet points.

But I don’t know, maybe years from now I’ll only remember the three animated characters and think of this as one of the good ones. Some movies don’t have a nice rock man, a giant planet eater and a flying metal naked lady. This one does, I gotta give it some credit.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 6th, 2025 at 1:43 pm and is filed under Reviews, Comic strips/Super heroes. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

10 Responses to “The Fantastic 4: First Steps”

  1. I sense I’ll be in the minority here, but I adored this one. I’m surprised and delighted to say it’s my favorite movie of the year so far.

    For me, the movie is about what it means to bring a child into a doomed world. It’s a thought I have every time I see someone having kids here in our reality. Don’t they know the world is ending? How could they do this? Galactus in this movie can represent any calamity you like: he’s infinitely hungry like capitalism, and he’s a massive existential threat to our species, like climate change. He is coming for our children. So what do we do?

    What I like about this film is that it takes place in the world we were promised by that ’50s and ’60s sci-fi: not just one that has flying cars, gorgeous mid-century modern and retro-futurist production design (costumes, too– I want to buy Reed’s turtleneck)– but also one in which global cooperation is actually achievable. In this movie, the entirety of human civilization works together in very little time under extreme duress to save the planet. I can’t see that every happening in our world, but I loved seeing it here. A better world is possible.

    Also, I thought they got the characters right. I love how Pascal’s Reed is brilliant but can’t solve the equation of being a father (and is shook by his inability to defeat Galactus). This version of the Human Torch is more of the Tom DeFalco/Paul Ryan older Johnny, but they gave him a lot to do and I thought it was handled well. Same with Ben– they skip a lot of the angst. He’s still insecure but a little more comfortable in his rocky skin. And I love how it all comes down to Sue in the end. Galactus himself looks awesome, like those super-detailed drawings or paintings by artists like Jose Ladronn. This version of Silver Surfer is neat, and I loved the crazy cosmic space-surfing. That whole escape sequence in the middle was super-exciting.

    I do wish they kept Malkovich in. Mole Man was fun, though. And HERBIE? I’d die for HERBIE.

    The very end, with the Jack Kirby quote– look, I choked up. Jack Kirby is, for me, *the* American comics artist of the 20th century. And while I wish they paid him a lot of money while he was still alive like they did for Stan Lee, I really felt the Kirby crackle in this one.

  2. I’ll see this… eventually.

    As a kid, the closest news stand carried no DC. So young jojo had no Superman or Batman (other than Adam West) so the Fan4 was my Justice League. Therefore, I feel kind of obligated, even though I’m not expecting a whole lot.

    The trailers… seemed fine. I know people love The Bear and the guy from The Bear because the show’s great and he’s great. But I wish when playing a character with the most distinctive speech pattern in comics outside of The Hulk (“Yer askin’ the wrong guy. I got kicked out of Hebrew school which don’t make you feel like one ‘a the chosen people, let me tell ya…”) he would had made an attempt to emulate it. But I understand, actors are artists not mimics. They have to put their own spin on rock monsters from the past, find their inner rock monster, etc.

    Plus, when you have the ‘family is super important’ speeches in the fucking trailer… Can we have a new moral? I propose bringing back old chestnuts such as ‘killing people is wrong’ or ‘power corrupts’ or something. We been told how important family is enough for three lifetimes. Perhaps it’s time to move towards more pressing matters.

  3. agree with Vern. I’m especially surprised people are finding Sue the heart of the movie. She spends most of the movie scolding the boys and that speech scene… yeah the mother who doesn’t want to sacrifice her baby? And people are easily convinced? That’s all you got?

  4. I saw it and felt it was fine but nothing great. My biggest problem with it is that they don’t develop the characters well in the weaker first section of the film so that when the threat shows up, you’re not really with them during the threat nor in the action scenes. You are simply watching it, not exactly shrugging but not enthralled. Therefore whatever is thrown at you, and there are some nice images, its not grabbing you emotionally. I was team Galactus is what I am saying. That poor guy got sent into exile just because he saw us as a burger and fries.

    The Naked Gun, released a week later, is so much more fun, with way more invention. It and Superman is how you re-invent old and beloved characters and stories.

  5. This is one of those rare times when I pretty much have the exact opposite opinion to Vern. And that’s ok.

    Like many people, I saw a lot of similarities between this and Superman. But in this case, I really enjoyed this one (despite it having some flaws of course) and was only lukewarm on Superman. Superman was enjoyable while I watched it but the more I think about it the less I like it.

    This one I keep thinking about little cool things about it like watching the Silver Surfer tear across the screen, seeing Galactus in all his comic book glory, laughing at a truly brilliant version of the Mole Man.

    I thought some of it felt rushed and frankly I wanted more but wanting more is kind of a good thing, right?

    I’m starting to think that how a person feels about this vs Superman depends on how they feel about the characters going in. I’ve always enjoyed Marvel more than DC, so seeing the Fantastic Four done well was far more exciting experience for me than seeing another Superman movie, this time with (in my opinion) a weak script, a sort of bland Superman, a Lex who spends most of the movie in one location, a bunch of b-listers who ultimately are more super than Superman.

    I’m starting to sound more down on Superman than I really am. My point is that I think both of these movies are bright, fun movies which are proud of their comic history while also being kind of sloppy messes if you think about them for a minute or two. The extent to which someone is willing to overlook the sloppiness probably depends on whether you’re more excited to see Mole Man or Metamorpho on the big screen.

  6. I pretty much agree with everything Vern said and yet I still like the movie. This might be the case of I want to like it, so therefore I like it. There are definitely problems, but I guess the pros outweigh the cons for me. I love the look of it/the overall esthetic, the cast, that Sue got more to do than just turn invisible. Yeah, it’s a weak story and the characters aren’t fleshed out enough, and that CGI baby had traces of the abomination they called a baby in the TWILIGHT movie (whichever one that was) but it wasn’t quite as bad. So, as of right now, I like it. We’ll see if that stands up.

  7. Didn’t this one get chopped down to size by the studio? I haven’t seen it, so who knows if that’s the problem. But I can imagine that the original story got a bit distorted by an overbearing Disney.

    But I absolutely love the retro-60s aesthetic. People have been saying that Marvel should take this approach with the Fantastic Four for decades now, and I’m glad they finally went through with it on the third try.

  8. I loved Superman and I loved Fantastic Four. My life is awesome!

  9. re: edits, I recall a few years ago that, with a few exceptions, filmmakers were being ordered to trim all MCU movies to under two hours. I don’t think that’s a bad strategy, but given the amount of lore in all these recent movies, it’s no wonder they feel so truncated and under-realized. ETERNALS beat the rap with a two and a half hour runtime, and they still tried to shoehorn Blade, Black Knight, Eros and Pip in there, in a way that left no one wanting more.

    As for this, the one thing I wondered, that never seem to come up, is that the 1960’s world seems awfully receptive to Reed Richards’ suggestions. There’s that one moment where he reveals he’s got a bunch of Fifth Element-style flying cars patrolling the neighborhood which I felt was awfully Orwellian, though it never comes up again. And when Reed proposes that 1) We have to conserve energy as a planet, to 2) MOVE THE EARTH, apparently everyone is cool with it. There is the conflict of whether or not they should give the baby to Galactus, but Sue does a pretty successful job talking the natives down. What I’m trying to say is, is it possible the Fantastic Four pretty much rule this reality? Is the presence, or absence, of certain dramatic tensions tied to the fact that they have conquered Earth 828?

  10. @Glaive Robber

    They seem to have conquered Earth 828 with charm. They even got some cartoons out there to indoctrinate the next generations.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>