"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Wolf Man (2025)

WOLF MAN is an event not just because it’s a new wolf man but because it’s the fourth movie directed by Leigh Whannell, the last two being UPGRADE and THE INVISIBLE MAN. As with the latter, he’s working with Blumhouse to do a mid-budget modern take on one of the classic monsters (this time co-writing with his wife Corbett Tuck).

His version takes place in a mountainous part of Oregon where very few people live. In 1995, a hiker disappears there, and the locals claim to have spotted him suffering from some kind of disease. (I like that this turns him into a local legend like the Wild Man of the Navidad or the North Pond hermit.)

Grady Lovell (Sam Jaeger, LUCKY NUMBER SLEVIN) is a serious hunter, possibly survivalist, definitely very intense, living off the grid in a little cabin in the woods. He brings his son Blake (Zac Chandler) hunting and is always yelling at him to pay attention to his lessons about how dangerous the world is and shit. They get separated chasing a deer and Blake gets a glimpse of… well, you know. They end up hiding in a deer blind listening to an unseen beast tearing up their deer. That night Blake hears his dad talking to someone on the CB about what he saw. He told his kid it was a bear, but he knows it was something else. Or maybe he’s crazy. That would be fair to assume.

Thirty years later Blake is played by Christopher Abbott, who I only know from his great performance in POSSESSOR, so I was surprised to see him as kind of a lovable Paul Rudd type here. (Also, they did a really good job casting the young version.) He’s introduced in San Francisco with his daughter Ginger (Matilda Firth, DISENCHANTED), he’s carrying multiple Exploratorium gift shop bags and a giant teddy bear for her, she’s wearing fairy wings, begging for ice cream even though she already got hot chocolate. They have an adorable relationship but when she climbs on top of a traffic barrier he angrily snaps at her about how it’s his job to protect her and she needs to listen to him. Basically turns into his dad, except that he immediately catches himself and apologizes.

Things are also cold with his wife Charlotte (Julia Garner, WE ARE WHAT WE ARE), a work-obsessed magazine writer. She feels distant from Ginger while Blake has bonded with her as a stay-at-home dad.

Blake got the hell away from his dad as soon as he could, didn’t keep in touch, and now receives word that he’s been legally declared dead after many years missing. Since he needs to go clear out the cabin he convinces Charlotte to take time off and come along, hoping some time out in nature will help heal the family.

And they do have some laughs together. Then there’s a car crash and a growling beast and the whole vacation has gone to shit. They spend it trying to survive the night so they can go for help in the morning.

Whannell’s big twist on werewolf mythology is to ditch it. His version of lycanthropy is just an aggressive infection, there’s nothing about lunar cycles or silver bullets. You get bit, you turn into a wolf man after a while, that’s it. In an interview with Fangoria, Whannell cites THE FLY and THE THING as the biggest influences, mentions “body horror” repeatedly. (He also mentions UNDER THE SKIN, AMOUR and THE ZONE OF INTEREST?)

So there are some good scares involving this animal scratching at the outside of the cabin, but the most effective stuff is showing Blake’s changes from his point-of-view (how he discovers his super-hearing is particularly brilliant) and alternately from Charlotte’s. The primary theme is the importance of communication between loved ones, so it’s upsetting to switch between their perspectives as they hear each other’s speech as bizarre gibberish. There are definitely moments that tapped into my experiences and fears of losing faculties from brain diseases.

The atmosphere is strong, there’s some well-executed chasing, some good gross outs (spoiler: Charlotte really gets worried when she finds him munching on his infected arm wound), and Abbott gets really into hunching and crawling and acting weird. I’m still a big fan of Garner, and she’s a good choice to step up and take the baton as the lead after Abbott goes animal. Also it’s kinda cute that they have her wearing a plaid shirt like the werewolf trope (I was thinking it came from Lon Chaney Jr. but his shirt wasn’t plaid, and I looked into it and no one seems to know where it comes from). There’s a nice nod to Whannell’s past as the guy who wrote SAW when (SPOILER) Blake gnaws his own leg off to escape a bear trap, but he literally and figuratively can’t go very far after that. I thought what now? It’s not gonna grow back, is it? What will he do? Well I guess crawl, maybe hop, you don’t really see him much after that.

The scariest times are definitely when you don’t see the wolf, just hear its growling and see its hot breath rising from the other side of the blind, or see a shape moving through the foggy translucent tenting of the greenhouse (one of the cooler set pieces). I say that both as a compliment to the director’s horror chops and an admission that unfortunately this is not a cool looking wolf man.

I think I kinda like this movie, but I know I was disappointed. It’s that sad phenomenon of enjoying a movie all the way through but when it ends it feels like it wasn’t enough. The problem is more in concept than execution. On one hand, I like the idea that the painful transformation takes place over hours, and I don’t blame them for noticing that all werewolf transformation sequences are held up to AN AMERICAN WEREWOLF IN LONDON and THE HOWLING and none can compete. On the other hand, a werewolf movie that doesn’t have the whole aspect of fearing the inevitable loss of control and then dealing with the consequences the next day, or even the issue of how to kill a supernatural monster, simply doesn’t feel like a full werewolf movie. Also, as much as I can intellectually respect the puffy-faced, not extremely wolfy monster design… I can’t really get excited about it. I would rather come out thinking that was a cool monster than that monster makes sense if you think about it.

Another thing that’s hard to get around: no wolf fodder. The movie doesn’t feel tiny in scale, because there are all those woods, but when you think about it there are only a handful of characters, it’s mostly just set at this isolated cabin, there are no neighbors, so no body count.

It might be a matter of expecting the wrong thing. Whannell’s previous two movies as director have a two-pronged approach, in my mind. First they ask how they can reinvent this sort of story, then they ask ‘Now that we’ve set that up, what kind of cool shit can we do with it?’ I feel like WOLF MAN does some of the first part and isn’t really interested in the second part. It ends up being a fairly traditional (if simplified) werewolf movie, and other than the strong choices in how to depict his perspective it’s mostly the themes that Whannell seems invested in, and that stand out.

They are themes we’ve seen many times before, but I think Whannell at least has a different take on them than usual. Maybe the movie doesn’t agree with him, or admit it agrees with him, but usually a character like Blake would start to feel very emasculated. He’s out of work, he’s concierge to a pampered fairy princess, she puts lipstick on him, then his wife comes home from work from an occupation he can’t find work in and ignores him. He’s removed from his rugged upbringing, living in the city, then he goes back and can’t remember how to get around. His wife is shocked by the sight of a hunting rifle, very uncomfortable with it being in the car when they get lost and have to pick up Blake’s childhood friend Derek (Benedict Hardie, HACKSAW RIDGE) for help finding the property. There’s strong tension as Derek compliments their lifestyle but maybe backhandedly, and when he doesn’t ask Charlotte about herself so she volunteers, “I’m a journalist.”

The novel thing is I don’t think Blake comes off as embarrassed of any of this. He should be happy that Ginger doesn’t know what a hunting blind is, and calls it a treehouse. I think he knows, and the movie agrees, that he found a healthier life for himself and his kid. His problems all come from his father’s choices, and from briefly returning to his roots. His dad’s idea of protection does the opposite, tragedy ensues, Blake’s gentle relationship with his daughter prevents it from being even worse. City boy did a better job of protecting his family by keeping some of his true girl-dad self, not by finding the beast within or manning up or some shit. I wish I liked the whole movie as much as I like that notion.

 

This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 22nd, 2025 at 1:49 pm and is filed under Reviews, Horror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

23 Responses to “Wolf Man (2025)”

  1. Probably not the most important observation, but I haven’t seen the movie yet although I have plans to see it this weekend with a buddy… this would be Whannell’s 4th movie as director. His debut was Insidious: Chapter 3 then Upgrade and Invisible Man.

  2. I had the same feeling with this film. I saw it yesterday and wanted to like it more than I did. I was fine with the concept of the wolfman infection being a disease changing him but felt the disease was so quick-acting and extreme that it pulled me from the story as it felt too unrealistic (or lacked something in the set-up that would ground it). I didn’t like the opening section in the past as I think it explained too much that could have been left mysterious for better build when the suspense. and that more character build between the main characters earlier would have helped, to flesh out the wife character and the relationship between the couple. The lack of connection to the characters ensured when the horror came it got more of a shrug reaction than terror. I also found the suspense beats to be okay but not great. Some of it reminded me of Ginger snaps, the low budget werewolf film in the real world that did more interesting beats with its limited action and character work. To me the film was a miss but it tried something.

  3. Thought this very poor indeed, which was a shame after loving Upgrade and Invisible Man.

    I wonder if they reworked it at some point after originally intending for Blake to be a less likeable character?

    Invisible Man had a simple formula and this one almost replicates it – take a classic horror stape (Invisible Man, Wolf Man), shave the fantastic edges off (a magic potion becomes a high-tech suit, lycanthropy becomes a nasty but not full wolf infection) and then maps it onto a real emotional dynamic.

    The last one is the kicker. Invisible Man works so well because the first part of the formula and the last loop around – being in an abusive, controlling relationship makes you feel surveilled. You never know when you’re safe. The power stalkers get is because you don’t always know when they’re active and they start to feel outsized. It makes the fantastic premise feel real by scaling it back a bit, then plugs it into real feelings. Someone having control over you IRL can literally feel like they’re the invisible man watching you.

    It feels like they wanted to do something similar here and stepped away from it and left the film feeling like a muddle in result. It feels like they’re setting up the werewolfism as a metaphor for a physically abusive, volatile relationship. This guy who is perfect 99% of the time, then snaps, then as if by magic is able to assume his old, safe form – but you can never quite trust it. Maybe a big part of the person doing the snapping genuinely wants to stop or feels like it’s something else inside of him doing it. Maybe it was something in his childhood, or a paternal dynamic, that caused it? Maybe it was triggered by a move out to the sticks, or a feeling of being emasculated or dependent?

    I found it frustrating that the film alludes to or sets up the very weakest version of all of the above but then just shrugs and backs away from it, because they want him to ultimately be a good guy. I think it also explains why Garner feels off – her character feels underdeveloped because at one point she was probably the protagonist. The ending shot makes sense if she has got out of a bad situation, like a shitty abusive marriage and has come out of it changed but resolute. It does not make sense as the ending of a film in which you lose the love of your life who was great and who you maybe took for granted a bit.

    Garner also reads as much younger than her actual age (30) and the kid reads as like 11 which made me again wonder if the film was developed and cast with a different dynamic in mind. An older guy marrying and knocking up a teen is also a very particular bad relationship dynamic.

    Which is all to say, it feels like they considered making but backed away from a film that, while not subtle, would be saying something that makes sense and would have emotional resonance. It kind of would feel particularly timely to make now – when there is a genuine movement – connected to preppers who live rurally – which radicalises on esmasculated or insecure men and turns them into predators.

    But it wouldn’t have mattered anyway I guess because a film with a wolf design that bad was always going to be dead on arrival. The film has genuine suspense in the first third when it hides everything – it’s all over as soon as you see the fella on the car bonnet. It never recovers.

  4. Thanks for the correction, emteem. Now I try to remember if I saw that one.

  5. Kind of got into it once I got over just how much I disliked the werewolves (they look like the initial interstitial stages of a werewolf transformation in a movie with better werewolves).

    I also agree with Steven above about the botched take on its themes. I think it’s kind of sweet that they set up a ‘wounded masculinity’ tale only to then have Blake ignore that bait and remain an amazing father and husband… but it leaves the script feeling really half-arsed.
    I like Vern’s analysis about the failure of the dad where his son succeeds by not being a jerk, though – it’s there if you squint, and I’ll take it.

    Another thing I liked is how the premise is set up of a threat outside and someone inside slowly turning into the same threat. It’s a zombie movie setup applied to a different monster type.

    Dunno. I was also disappointed, but I think there was enough good stuff in there to make it enjoyable.

  6. I’ve spent the month watching and rewatching previous Whannel joints. The INSIDIOUS franchise is okay. UPGRADE and INVISIBLE MAN are still bangers. As for WOLF MAN, I liked it but didn’t love it.

    Like Steven E, going in I assumed this would be Garner’s movie, and it would be about abusive relationships– though that seemed like it would be too similar to INVISIBLE MAN. But they went in a different direction. I see it more about (buzzwords incoming) generational trauma. Blake outright states that fathers give scars to their children, and it’s about fear of passing those scars onto your kids. In that thematic department, I think the movie works. (Also it’s the same theme as the Whannell-story-by’d INSIDIOUS: THE RED DOOR, and daddy issues are also central to 2010’s THE WOLFMAN.) But this movie isn’t honed to a knife edge like INVISIBLE MAN, and Whannell has stated he wanted it to be about multiple things. He referenced a friend who died from ALS, COVID isolation, and the Alzheimer’s movie STILL ALICE, trying to also make it a movie about watching a love one succumb to a horrible disease. But I don’t think the ending is compatible with that take on it.

    Christopher Abbott is really good here (also agree the Young Blake casting is stellar). It’s a very natural, believable performance, and he handles the on-the-(wet)-nose bits well. His physicality in terms of wolfing out is well done. In human form he looks more like Lon Chaney’s wolf man than he does when transformed, though personally I didn’t have any problems with the creature design.

    What did bug me was how dimly lit the movie was. NOSFERATU was also literally dark, but lit in a way that put definition in the darkness. WOLF MAN is just dark. I worry when it hits streaming it will look like sludge. (I did like the sound though, especially in the prologue.)

    I also watched 1941’s THE WOLF MAN and 2010’s THE WOLFMAN, and I’d say they’re all about the same level of quality, with different strengths and weaknesses amongst them.

  7. My whole life, werewolves have been my favorite monster. Since even before I was able to watch werewolf movies, I’ve loved werewolves. So believe me when I tell you that I have learned to settle for less when it comes to werewolf cinema. Almost all werewolf movies skimp on the werewolf. That’s just the way it is. Even the very best one (AMERICAN WEREWOLF, obviously) could use a little more werewolf. It’s also not uncommon for a werewolf movies to have no werewolf in it at all. That’s the big twist. “You thought there was a werewolf in this werewolf movie? Psych!” The venerable werewolf is the only monster this happens to on a regular basis. There are no Godzilla movies with no Godzilla in it. Zombie movies, as a rule, have zombies in them. I’ve seen one vampire movie with no vampire in it, and that was MARK OF THE VAMPIRE from 1935, and people are still mad about it. Vampire fans will not stand for that kind of disrespect. Werewolf fans are accustomed to it.

    And a wolf man is a lesser subset of werewolf anyway. If you know a movie’s going with a wolf man and not a full-fledged werewolf, you pitch your expectations down from awesome animatronics and air bladder transformations to fake fangs and some fur glued to the face. You take what you can get.

    So my expectations were not high. Wannell’s a good filmmaker but I was prepared to be let down on the werewolf front. It is, sadly, tradition.

    But I just do not understand why you’d make a WOLF MAN movie with all of Universal’s millions like ten years after the last WOLF MAN movie that everybody hated because it had a Wolf Man who wasn’t wolfy enough and then your big idea is to make a WOLF MAN movie with an even less wolfy Wolf Man. Like, you don’t HAVE to make this movie, man. Nobody’s forcing you to. You want to just make some gross hairless feral virus-having guy-terrorizes-his-loved-ones-in-a-cabin-because-of-daddy-issues movie, go right ahead. Nobody’s stopping you. You could just leave the Wolf Man out of this entirely. Some of us like cool werewolves, though. You know, like the kind of people who would go see a movie called WOLF MAN. I’m sure there’s plenty of other people who would go see GROSS HAIRY FERAL GUY WITH DADDY ISSUES. Go after that demographic if that’s the one you want. Werewolf fans don’t have to be involved. Haven’t we been through enough?

  8. Majestik, this is why I cherish Bad Moon.

    American Werewolf is the best but Bad Moon puts it all into a mean looking son of a bitch werewolf.

    The perfect mix. No Jack Nicholson bullshit and no True Blood Siberian Huskies.

    Bad Moon is so confident in its werewolf it films it in a brightly lit bedroom punching shit.

  9. BAD MOON is definitely upper echelon.

  10. It’s got some of the ugliest VFX I’ve seen, but I have to give it up for TOKYO GRAND GUIGNOL for showing the full transformation of a human penis to a werewolf penis, done up in a more realistic way than on WOLFCOP. And the story around it is actually pretty fun if you can ignore how ugly it looks.

  11. @Maj
    Yeah, were-beasts have been my jam my whole life. I cannot overstate that. Quist’s transformation absolutely scarred and fascinated tiny me back in the 80’s. Hell, The Prophecy’s mutant bear did the same trick. Love me some man-beast-mutants. Probably why I was also obsessed with TMNT’s weirder and more obscure characters (C’mon Dreadmon!).
    But between you and me and the interwebs here, dude, David Case!
    The entire set-up for this film sounds remarkably similar to my favorite werewolf novel ever (and God, I’ve read a lot), “Wolf Tracks” by Mr. Case.
    Even down to the “werewolf” not working AT ALL how we traditionally think of them.
    SPOILERS for an out of print novel:

    Let’s say you might keep the rotting corpse of an actual wolf in your son’s closet so you can huff its fumes and will yourself into an interpretation of a “werewolf”, put on a raincoat and hat and hunt down prostitutes who remind you of your sons girlfriend who you resent for upending your family life.

    Outside of that one, David Case is pretty much the undisputed master of werewolves. Maybe his most famous is “The Hunter”, but “The Cell”, “Among the Wolves” and “Dead End” are up there. And everyone a different take but entirely satisfying. Nobody made them scarier than he did and he’s got a whole grip of them. Please, please check his work out.
    Not to mention that his novella “Pelican Cay” is one of the absolute best zombie stories ever, if you’re into that.

    May I also recommend “The Hyde Effect” by Steve Vance? It’s not the best in terms of prose, but it’s fascinating in its detail. Like, do you ever think of what happens to all the fur after they change back? Also the scariest and most brutal werewolf attacks a roadside diner sequence in all of fiction, for sure.

    I should stop. I can recommend werewolf fiction for days.

  12. I am much more of a horror-viewer than I am a horror-reader. I try, but the voluminousness of prose and page count that’s accepted in horror tends to be more than my ideal. I’m a crime guy. I like a tight sentence. Brisk pace. Horror writers like to spread out. I keep giving them a shot but I remain woefully underread in that genre. I will be on the lookout for these authors, though.

    That said, I can recommend Stephen Graham Jones’ recent-ish werewolf novel MONGRELS. That guy wouldn’t know how to belabor a sentence or pad a page count if you paid him. It’s kind of a white trash werewolf saga, with a lot of that attention to weird, gross detail that you mentioned in those other novels. I’d recommend anything else he wrote, as well. His subject matter is pure genre trash, slashers and zombies and deer women, but his style transforms it all into pulp poetry. Guy makes me jealous as hell. He writes breathlessly, ecstatically yet unpretentiously, as if he and his keyboard are rocketing off over a chasm and the only thing keeping him from falling into empty space is the word bridge he’s constructing keystroke by frantic keystroke. Sometimes he fails and plummets into the abyss, and somehow that’s almost as good. He wrote one winding, buttonhooking sentence in THE ONLY GOOD INDIAN that made me put the book down and say “Fuck.” I had to take a moment and reassess some things. Either I was gonna get gooder or I was gonna quit. The man didn’t leave me a choice. The gauntlet was thrown.

  13. You’re in kind company, Maj when it comes to page counts. So the good news is that Case pretty much only wrote shorts or novellas. Hell, “Wolf Tracks” clocks in around 200 pages. “Short, sharp shocks” as someone called what I like once.

    Holy shit, why isn’t anyone talking about Mr. Vengeance directing a Westlake adaptation? “The Ax” was fucking great!

  14. Ah, fuck. @Maj, you hated my favorite werewolf project in many years. Maybe take my recs with a grain of silver.

    Could I posit that the one classic horror space that werewolves can inhabit, one which a vampire or Franken can, is ambiguity. “Are you an actual monster or just a psycho” has a lot of meat. Werewolves seem to be a popular avatar to view that. Just as mortality is important to Draculas, loss is the theme of were’s. Draculas touch on that but, as has been said, what if you wake up NOT a monster today?
    Were-monsters have to reckon with what they’ve done and that is as elemental as “dead-guy sucks blood and needs a good lay”.

  15. I assume we’re talking about WOLF OF SNOW HOLLOW. There were good things about it. As a story, I could get down with it. I actually didn’t hate the twist. What they gave us instead of a werewolf was kind of cool. I just have some kind of violent allergy to the director/writer/star/caterer. I just cannot stand that guy. Even in his little bit in HALLOWEEN: WHICHEVER ONE THAT WAS, his whole energy just angered me. He’s like the worst parts of Jim Carrey mated with the worst parts of Joaquin Phoenix and made a baby made entirely out of flop sweat. And that energy infects his directing, so scenes that should have worked for me just pissed me off.

    Honestly, don’t listen to me about any movie made after like 2019 or so. Nine times out of ten, I can’t even get into the stories because I hate the vibe so much. I don’t seem to possess the enzymes required to break down these ingredients into digestible entertainment.

  16. @Maj
    Hey, asshole, don’t do that.

    Your voice does matter to some of us. Don’t call my girl ugly.

    Yeah, Snow Hollow. I get it. I’m probably more Jim Cummings myowndamnself, but that’s why it worked. I’m an asshat and wouldn’t handle it well. I might not have Rob Forrester as my dad either. We all fall short. It worked for me.

    Hit me up for more were-books. I got a bunch!

  17. I also think the movie’s themes are a bit confused with themselves given the depiction of the lead as a decent guy. Also HIS dad isn’t exactly wrong to be as overprotective as he was given what he knew was out there, though one could argue moving to a different area might have been a wiser course. I originally wondered if it was a vendetta and that maybe Blake’s mother had been killed by the intro’s Wolf Man, but Whannell says he originally had a scene of a young Blake watching her dying from ALS. So there’s more a lot of complicated issues here than outright bad intentions from characters it seems, but horror doesn’t really allow for people just going to therapy as the solution to things like this. It has to be something much more definitive and

    SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

    Blake’s ultimate fate fits that, but doesn’t seem entirely appropriate for who he was. Couldn’t he have just went out dying from wounds sustained from fighting his dad? If you try to put what happens at the end into context of what the movie was making the disease a metaphor for, it’s seems like a pretty bleak view of “if you have a personality flaw that could potentially grow into something worse, you should just not be around anymore. Not work on it.” Kinda reminded me of how the ending to SMILE pissed me off

    FURTHER SPOILERS FOR SMILE

    by the whole curse demon being a metaphor for trauma ending with “No point in trying to confront your issues and overcome them. They’ll always win!”, which the writer-directed kinda admitted was done just to have a horror movie type ending, which feels a bit creatively hollow for something ostensibly about such a serious subject.

  18. I second Stephen Graham Jones.

    Jack Ketchum always had that Hemingway of Horror tight minimalist prose as well saying a lot in barely 100 pages sometime.

  19. Count a thumbs up for me for Stephen Graham Jones as well.

    The best werewolf novel I’ve read – and just a top tier horror novel in general was “Moon Dance” by S. P. Somtow, an epic that tells a vampire story through the lens of an 18th century western.

  20. @Miguel
    I’ve heard good things about that one and maybe it’s just me but Vampire Junction by Somtow was just interminably dull and muddled. Johnny Alucard by Kim Newman did the same stuff way more entertainingly.
    @Kyle
    Yesss. Ketchum’s The Offseason is *chef’s kiss* but his story “The Box” just fucking rips your guts out without spilling a drop of blood. I’d also recommend “The Woods Are Dark” by Laymon. Boy…
    I’ve been perusing my shelves and eyeballing some stuff I don’t see brought up around here too much (other than all my Richard Starks, of course).
    We gotta have some Laird Barron fans here, right?

  21. Just throwing this bone to you dogs, a great starter kit: The Mammoth Book of Werewolves.
    After two decades I still don’t understand links but I’ll try.

  22. Right. So Google its isfdb page. Its got some bangers.

  23. Aktion Figure-Offseason is so good and I’ve read almost all of his. Cover and The Lost and his western The Crossing (got an autographed copy) being highlights. Agreed The Box is a short form
    masterpiece and I love all of Peaceable Kingdom. And the Woods Are Dark is probably my favorite Laymon novel. Also throwing one more at ya..I’ve got the Māmmoth Book of Werewolves too.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>