"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

The Eiger Sanction

Unless I’m forgetting something, Clint Eastwood only has two movies that could be classified as spy movies, and both involve a mission to a mountain in the Alps. One is WHERE EAGLES DARE (1968) and the other is this one, THE EIGER SANCTION (1975). I’d say it’s about 65% suspenseful mountain climbing thriller, 25% assassin intrigue, and 10% colorful James Bond type shit. That last portion includes all the sexy stuff and the sinister boss, an albino war criminal named Dragon (Thayer David, ROCKY).

Clint plays Dr. Jonathan Hemlock, a great pulp hero because he’s an ex-Green Beret, secretly a retired assassin, but famously a retired mountain climber (there are fawning magazine profiles of him), now working as a college art history professor, and has a side gig as a book critic. I wondered if this might’ve been an influence on RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK when I saw one of his students (Candice Rialson, CANDY STRIPE NURSES) making eyes and spreading legs at him in class. He turns her down because he doesn’t take advantage of students or drunks, he says. Good to know he has some limits.

Hemlock doesn’t seem fond of Pope (Gregory Walcott, PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE), a thug for the C2 agency sent to get him for Dragon, or Miss Cerberus (Elaine Shore, THE SENTINEL), the cartoonishly grouchy nurse who screens him for contagions before entering the darkened chamber of her immuno-compromised boss. He also hates Dragon, the organization and the job and doesn’t particularly care that somebody offed one of the other operatives, Wormwood (camera assistant Frank Redmond), over some microfilm hidden in a pack of Bazooka Joe bubble gum. The only reason he agrees to one last job is because Dragon threatens to snitch on his collection of stolen paintings. Those are his babies. So he agrees to go “sanction” somebody in trade for documents clearing his collection with the IRS. I love that motive. This is a good movie.

The mission is a cinch, but obviously there’s a catch. On the return trip he brings home flirtatious flight attendant Jemima Brown (Vonetta McGee, BLACULA, SHAFT IN AFRICA), wakes up and she stole his money and IRS document. Duh, dude, she works for Dragon, and now you gotta kill another guy to get your prize. But there are some plus sides to it, including that he’s authorized to kill a guy who betrayed him, Miles Melough (Jack Cassidy, voice in Mister Magoo cartoons).

And it really is a mission he has a better shot at that anybody. He has to join an international climbing expedition up the north face of the Eiger mountain in Switzerland, because C2 believe’s one of them killed Wormwood. They’re working on figuring out which one before the actual climb, but you can guess whether or not that ends up happening.

To get ready he goes to a school run by his old friend Ben Bowman (George Kennedy, SMALL SOLDIERS), so this is in the elite category of Eastwood films that include training montages. Ben starts him off and then hands him over to George (Brenda Venus, FOXY BROWN), a nimble and silent young woman whose cut-off jeans lead him up hills and cliffs like that fake rabbit the greyhounds chase at the dog track. This joins ANY WHICH WAY YOU CAN as one of the movies where Clint Eastwood does extensive jogging in jeans.

Eventually Hemlock and Bowman get to Switzerland and meet the other climbers. Some are more suspicious than other, which makes them less suspicious, but either way his life depends on people he doesn’t like. The worries about who’s throat he needs to cut before they cut his line are almost an afterthought to the actual ascent (which he previously failed at).

One of the main appeals of this movie is that they shot this stuff on real mountains. My kneejerk reaction was that it’s because it was made long before the digital era, back when more things were done for real, when you had less of a choice. Now you can just have computers do it, like when I checked Google to make sure I hadn’t reviewed THE EIGER SANCTION before and their patented World Destroying Bullshit Generator made up a fake opinion for me:


Amazing! I was just about to write that the director (some guy named Clint Eastwood)’s interesting lighting techniques aren’t particularly interesting visually, like most directors. They got me dead to rights.

But in reading about THE EIGER SANCTION I realized that even back then other filmmakers would’ve done some of it with soundstages, green screens and matte paintings. Clint’s insistence on really doing it was not standard operating procedure. In fact they had to develop special lightweight batteries just to be able to carry the camera and sound equipment up the mountains.

Supposedly Eastwood did all of his own climbing – even the big hanging scene at the climax where he’s suspended 4,000 feet above the ground – and it certainly looks like that’s true. It made for a thrilling movie, but maybe it was a mistake. Director of photography Frank Stanley (who had previously done BREEZY, MAGNUM FORCE and THUNDERBOLT AND LIGHTFOOT) blamed Eastwood for a fall that left him in a wheelchair for a while. (They never worked together again, but Stanley continued to work on movies including CAR WASH, CORVETTE SUMMER and GREASE 2.) I don’t know if anyone blames Clint for this, but a climber named David Knowles was killed by a falling boulder while filming. It’s a good movie but not worth a human life, I’d say.

I was amazed when a helicopter shot revealed that Eastwood and Kennedy really were somehow sitting on top of the 640 foot Totem Pole rock formation, enjoying a six-pack of Oly. As I suspected, they were lowered onto it by helicopter, but in order to get permission from the Navajo Nation they had to have a pair of actual climbers go up and remove hardware embedded into it by people who had illegally climbed it in the past.

THE EIGER SANCTION was playing in theaters when I was born, so it’s pretty fuckin old, and so are some of its attitudes. The albino spy boss and flamboyant gay rival (who names his dog the f-slur!) are entertainingly colorful characters but at the expense, in my modern day opinion, of respecting the humanity of real humans in those groups. There are questionable comments about Jemima’s name and Native American stereotype jokes made to George (though “screw Marlon Brando” is hard to deny), and more befuddlingly Hemlock makes a rape joke to Jemima right before they have sex. Most of this stuff my generation sees as inappropriate but we sort of remember the world being like this and understand it. That last one though surprised me, I definitely don’t get why he thinks that’s cute.

In the spy movie tradition there’s also a higher than usual amount of objectifying women and presenting a fantasy of what it would be like to be a walking aphrodisiac. Buxom young women are constantly hitting on Hemlock. Some he rejects, and at least one (uncredited as far as I can tell) he may not even notice behind him sunbathing and making eyes at him. But it’s a regular enough occurrence for him that just within the course of the movie he sleeps with two women who turn out to be working for someone. As the narrator of the vintage promo featurette on the Kino blu-ray puts it, “Glamorous women move in and out of his orbit, and he loves them frequently and well.”

I know why it’s hard to let go of this stuff. I am not immune to the appeal of Hemlock waking up to a phone call from Vonetta McGee saying “Good morning, baby. There’s coffee by your bed.” And then he comes home to find her in his house saying, “Wild Turkey on the rocks? Hmm?” She knows the way to a man’s heart. But it’s pretty clear to me there are men who want real human women to only be like that, and it’s fucking up the whole world. I’m against it.

One of the women Hemlock loves well, George, is either supposed to be of Native heritage, or Hemlock just assumes she is and starts making racial comments. The actress, Brenda Venus, is actually of Spanish and Sicilian heritage. Not long after this movie she purchased a book that had inside it an envelope with Henry Miller’s address, so he started writing to him. In the last four years of his life he wrote some 1,500 letters (4,000 hand-written pages) to his supposed muse who was sixty years his junior. Some were published as Dear, Dear Brenda: The Love Letters of Henry Miller to Brenda Venus in 1986. She was later both a centerfold and columnist for Playboy. In 2002 the gymnast Svetlana Khorkina starred in a Russian play about her life. I would argue that George is pretty intriguing for a non-verbal sex object character, but the real woman is more interesting, as tends to be the case.

(As another example, the character “Buns” is played by Susan Morgan Cooper, who never acted again but did direct the documentaries MIRJANA: ONE GIRL’S JOURNEY and AN UNLIKELY WEAPON.)

As retrograde as these characterizations are, there’s a message at the heart of the movie that’s timeless. Eventually we learn that (SPOILER) the whole Wormwood mission was a set up anyway. They wanted those (apparently fake) chemical weapons plans to be stolen, and they’re only “getting revenge” on the killers to make it seem real. So Hemlock is being forced into a dangerous and immoral mission that is entirely pointless. If I understand correctly, it’s not even that important to C2. It’s all just to trick the enemy into wasting a little time on a fake recipe.

That part at least seems to be in the spirit of the hit 1972 novel it was based on, the debut of a writer using the pen name Trevanian. What kind of an asshole would write under a made up mononym? Fuck that guy.

He was shy about revealing his real name, and even sent fakes to do interviews in his place (like MF DOOM sending “Doombots” to do some of his shows for him). He claimed in a rare 1979 interview to write “under five different names on several subjects: theology, law, aesthetics, film.” He actually did publish The Language of Film (1970) under “Rod Whitaker,” a shortened version of his given name. But he continued using others, telling Newsweek he would imagine himself as another writer as a form of Method acting. “I ask myself, ‘Who can tell this tale best? Who would already have this information?’”

He was from New York but earned bachelor’s and masters degrees in drama at the University of Washington – I researched it and I think he just missed overlapping with Bruce Lee. His master’s thesis play Eve of the Bursting was performed in 1960, Bruce enrolled in ’61. It’s more likely that he encountered Tobe Hooper and/or Tsui Hark while teaching film at the University of Texas at Austin. These are the types of things I think about. Not sure if you’re the same.

In a 1998 written interview Trevanian said the idea of The Eiger Sanction was to write “a quick little spoof on the then-popular super-spy/action genre,” though he’d only seen two films like that and read “only a third of one of Ian Fleming’s books – all he could manage before boredom weighted his eyelids.” He seemed proud of performing “the necessary task of ridiculing and diminishing the CIA” since he felt that “the Bay of Pigs-sort of CIA bungling was the one thing most likely to bring the world to atomic disaster.” But he was frustrated that critics and readers, especially in the U.S., took it as a serious spy novel, so he made the sequel The Loo Sanction (already published before the movie came out), a spoof of his initial spoof. “Alas, no. The book became a second international bestseller and was gobbled down as another scintillating example of the super-cool spy genre.”

(I’m sure he was thankful that his 1979 novel Shibumi, described as a “meta-spy thriller” and “cult novel,” was received tepidly and only built a following over time. Many seem to consider it his masterpiece, and Chad Stahelski is supposedly gonna direct a movie version.)

It definitely seems like Whitaker, much like Hemlock in his opening lecture, had disdain for “the unwashed masses.” He credited disillusionment with American materialism as the reason he lived and died in Somerset, England. He called the movie “vapid,” though he’s credited as co-writer, having written initial drafts with Hal Dresden (the guy who supposedly contributed “What we have here is a failure to communicate” in COOL HAND LUKE) when Paul Newman was going to star.

Eastwood had issues with the novel and existing script, but was looking for an opportunity to finish off his contract with Universal and move to Warner Brothers. He called Warren Murphy (creator of the The Destroyer books, basis of REMO WILLIAMS: THE ADVENTURE BEGINS, which has some similarities to this), who had never read Trevanian’s book, written a screenplay, or even seen a screenplay. But he read the book, “thought it was useless but pleasant dreck,” and wrote a new script in eight days. Eastwood had him add the revenge motivation. He didn’t like how amoral the character was in the book (though from the sounds of it that was part of Trevanian’s point).

I really like THE EIGER SANCTION and I’m glad I chose it as my traditional Clint Eastwood first-review-of-the-year. Hopefully it brings not-as-bad-as-expected tidings. As I look down the list I’m running kind of low on un-reviewed Clint movies, but there are a few more, and then I’ll just start over, I guess. These Clint reviews have brought us all good luck these last dozen years – imagine how shitty things would’ve been with bad luck. Jesus.

To really get 2025 started off right, here are some screen grabs I made for anyone who shares my appreciation for 1975 fashion. Happy new year everybody!

SPOILER POST-SCRIPT: I don’t entirely know what to make of the betrayal revealed at the end, but I kinda like that about it. Somehow Miles helped George get off of drugs – what qualifications does he have for that? It’s funny to have to accept that weirdo having a good side to him. Also you gotta wonder if Ben knew his daughter was gonna fuck Hemlock before she drugged him.

APPENDIX:

Previous entries in the Clint Eastwood new year tradition:

2013 – TROUBLE WITH THE CURVE
2014 – A PERFECT WORLD

2015 – THE OUTLAW JOSEY WALES

2016 – KELLY’S HEROES

2017 – PINK CADILLAC

2018 – TWO MULES FOR SISTER SARA
2019 – THE MULE

2020 – WHITE HUNTER BLACK HEART
2021 – THE GAUNTLET

2022 – ESCAPE FROM ALCATRAZ
2023- JOE KIDD
2024- HIGH PLAINS DRIFTER

This entry was posted on Thursday, January 2nd, 2025 at 5:50 pm and is filed under Reviews, Action, Thriller. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

35 Responses to “The Eiger Sanction”

  1. Happy new year, Vern and readers

  2. First of all, Happy New Year to you all!

    Vern, I would argue that FIREFOX also could be considered to be a spy movie. Perhaps more so than WHERE EAGLES DARE.

    And, old news of course, but when Guy Hamilton started working on LIVE AND LET DIE, he was interested in both Clint and Burt Reynolds for the lead. I don’t know if the offer got our man thinking about making his own spy movie, but it could have.

  3. Random common feature with FIREFOX: Actors who were huge in Germany, but never broke out outside of here, although it can be argued that Heidi Brühl (CAPTAIN SINDBAD, 1 episode of COLUMBO) and Reiner Schöne (MORTAL KOMBAT: ANNIHILATION, each one episode of MATLOCK, BABYLON 5, MACGIVER and STAR TREK TNG) were internationally a bit more successful than FIREFOX’s Klaus Löwitsch.

  4. This movie is hard as fuck. I bought one of those cheap triple-feature DVDs that had this, Coogan’s Bluff, and The Beguiled. It was entitled: “The Clint Eastwood Hard-as-Fuck Unofficial Trilogy”

    (Okay, I’m lying. I named it that. But, the point still stands)

  5. CJ, Klaus Löwitsch were huge here in Norway through his crime series PETER STROHM.

  6. This is the other movie that John Williams scored in 1975. It hasn’t quite had the longevity of his JAWS score, but it has it’s moments. Supposedly Williams gave it a jazzy mood to reflect Clint’s tastes, and there is a jazzy piano theme running through it, though it’s hard not to think Lalo Schiffrin wouldn’t have gone bigger with it. To my untutored ears it mostly sounds like John Barry in his quieter moments; not necessarily a bad thing.

    An English teacher put me on to Trevanian in the 1980s in an effort to wean me off my pulp addiction. In fact, the Hemlock books are no better than they had to be and if Trevanian was spoofing Fleming he certainly misjudged the snobbery. I think Clint did a fine job adapting this one. Shibumi is something else, and it’ll be interesting to see if the Stahelski movie ever gets made, although I’d’ve thought it’d work better as a limited prestige TV thing.

    Not to thoughtlessly objectify, and I know I’m not the first person to notice, but Vonetta McGee really was one of the most startlingly attractive actresses of this or any period. Just look at those photos above. She’d survived cancer in her teens and went on to make a number of films that I greatly admire.

  7. I wonder what AI Vern thought this would make a good double bill with. I would pitch for LOVE AND BULLETS which has Bronson let loose on 70s Switzerland. It’s not as good or as well directed as THE EIGER SANCTION but it has a funny turn from Jill Ireland and a splendidly proto-mega performance from Rod Stringer.

  8. Rod Steiger!

  9. THE STEIGER SANCTION

  10. Oh for fuck’s sake. The sight hasn’t let me post for a week and a half and THAT’S the post it finally lets through.

  11. I agree on the double bill with LOVE AND BULLETS, but in my book the Bronson movie is a LOT better than “not as good as THE EIGER SANCTION”. Anyway, if we throw ON HER MAJESTY’S SECRET SERVICE in there too, we have ourselves a real Switzerland crime evening.

  12. OHMSS would also join the dots between Williams, Schifrin and Barry, as I forgot to mention that LOVE AND BULLETS does have a Schifrin score.

    I am sorry to have offended you so early in the year, Pegsman. In my defence, I like them both a lot. I’m just more of a Clint guy.

    Happy New Year to all.

  13. I can see that I have earned a bit of a reputation here…No worries, I’m much more of a Graham Dorsey kind of guy than a Paul Kersey.

  14. Thanks, Pegsman. “I’m much more of a Graham Dorsey kind of guy”: trapped by your own legend, believed only by the insane? I hope I’m misreading this; your rep is finer than that around here.

  15. As long as it is noted that it was you, and not me, who used the phrase “believed only by the insane”, and that everyone here remembers the movie well enough to know that the real Dorsey was just your average cigar smoking, whiskey drinking, horny little devil, I can live with that. Especially the “trapped by your own legend” part.

    By the way, it’s difficult to post here these days.

  16. Pegsman, is it giving you trouble too? I know of two regulars who have been blocked out by 403 errors for days or longer. If anybody’s having that problem you can email me at outlawvern at hotmail dot com. I won’t know what to do but at least I’ll know the extent of the problem.

  17. It seems to be working today, but it didn’t all yesterday.

  18. Was 403-ed all of yesterday but seems ok now

  19. Good on google AI to set you straight there.

    Earlier I had this little gem when trying to find out when FRANKIE FREAKO would hit theaters here in the UK:

    “Frankie Freako is scheduled for a limited release in UK theaters on October 4, 2024” (it wasn’t, that’s just the US date)
    “The horror film is about a man-child who accidentally traps himself inside a puppet after calling a late-night party hotline (close, but no cigar)

    Director: Eros Vlahos (nope)
    Country: United Kingdom (nope)
    Duration: 11 minutes (nope)
    You can watch the traier for Frankie Freako on Facebook (eww, no!)

    basically, 0%. After that I put on a blocker to keep that shit out of my search results. The AI bubble burst is going to be painful, but this thing needs to be put out of its misery.

    Proof (such as it is):

  20. Hey, it worked! I was also blocked by an NGNIX error since Christmas eve, IIRC.

    Since I’m here I’ll try the link again, let’s see if I can get it right:

  21. Vern, before this drops too far down the home page, I want to say thank you for these new year Eastwood reviews. Your summer series get all the love, and deservedly so, but I really appreciate these reviews. They make getting back to my desk after Christmas that little bit easier, and it turns out that Clint movies really do provide a vehicle for reflection and consideration of the possibility of change as we go into each new year. I really hope they do bring you good luck.

    By my reckoning you have enough unreviewed Clint movies to take you into the next decade. Some of those are more glaringly obvious than others. You’ll know what’s right for the time, but if I may be permitted a pitch, I’d like to see a review of BRONCO BILLY, which I think would complete your reviews of the Eastwood-Locke movies. And unless we are getting TIGHTROPE The Musical sometime soon, I think it’s still the only Clint movie to be turned into a musical.

  22. Thank you Borg9, I’m really glad you feel that way and I appreciate you saying it. I have come close to doing BRONCO BILLY several years in a row, it has a good shot next year but we’ll see where I’m at then.

  23. There’s always REVENGE OF THE CREATURE.

  24. Seconding Borg’s comment. I think I already mentioned it, but the HIGH PLAINS DRIFTER review really resonated and inspired me to watch the film and then follow it up with PALE RIDER. Great stuff!

  25. Surely the easiest one to make into a musical must be CITY HEAT.

    Hoping for a review of Clint’s best non-western, THUNDERBOLT AND LIGHTFOOT, next year.

  26. I really thought I’d reviewed THUNDERBOLT AND LIGHTFOOT. It’s one of my favorites.

  27. I didn’t find anything using your search engine.

  28. All the big “missing” Eastwood reviews are really interesting movies, and for different reasons, so it’s all cool. Majestyk reminds me that I didn’t even count movies like THE FIRST TRAVELING SALESLADY, where Clint at least gets a billing, but, seriously, THE WITCHES (1967) might be worth a review one day.

  29. “Surely the easiest one to make into a musical must be CITY HEAT.”

    HONKYTONK MAN may disagree…but CITY HEAT could come a close second

  30. I will say to those who still find themselves struggling with the enigma known as Clint Eastwood: The Person (as opposed to Clint Eastwood: The Screen Persona), Bronco Billy will be the closest you’ll come to solving that enigma.

    (This was preeeeettty apparent to me the first time I saw it, but it was still helpful to hear him describe it as his most ‘personal’, as he tends to be enigmatic)

    Spoiler: It would certainly NOT be included in “The Clint Eastwood Hard-as-Fuck Unofficial Trilogy”

  31. Last week, while home sick, I tried to watch all of Clint’s 10 westerns. And now I think And now I think TWO MULES FOR SISTER SARA might be a good candidate for a musical.

    I would also be interested in seeing his musical PAINT YOUR WAGON turned into a regular western.

  32. *Sorry for turning into Foghorn Leghorn in the second sentence…

  33. “And now I think TWO MULES FOR SISTER SARA might be a good candidate for a musical.”

    Doubtless featuring the show-stopping ballad A Wimple Plan, and the popular favourite Grab the End of My Barrel, Sister (That Dynamite’s Gotta Blow)! Just as long as they don’t mess with Morricone’s main theme, which is absolutely one of his best.

    I hope you’re recovered now Pegsman. Be well!

  34. Thank you, Ernest. I am cancer free now, but there are some side effects to the treatment that I will have to live with for the rest of my life.

    As for TWO MULES FOR SISTER SARA the musical, I see the up-tempo tunes “Naked Nun”, “They were bad mothers…” and “Get in this tub with me” as the highlights!

  35. Yeah, I don’t know, all that casual machismo and racism honestly made me think this was a soft spoof, and I was not surprised to learn that the book it was taken from had those aspirations. I guess some bit of satire is always in the eye of the beholder. This deserves some thought, but the film is too loose before they get to the mountain (I think that whole gay villain subplot could have been omitted) to be worthy of a rewatch (for me). I was curious if this was appealing to Eastwood becuase he was into climbing at the time, but apparently not, and he was just all business about it. It is interesting to compare the attitude with Tom Cruise’s (MI:2 came to my mind at that monument valley shot), whose need to prove his stunt bona-fides feels a tiny bit desperate.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>