"I take orders from the Octoboss."

Blood Work

This latest directorial work by our greatest Badass Laureate, Mr. Clint Eastwood, didn’t go over too well in theaters. It was barely advertised and it disappeared about as fast as Mr. De Palma’s great FEMME FATALE. I figured how could you go wrong – starring Clint, directed by Clint, written by Brian Helgeland who wrote the Outlaw Award winning picture PAYBACK. But everyone told me it wasn’t too hot, kind of boring, with a predictable plot twist.

Well now I’ve finally caught up with it and although it’s not an outstanding new high for Clint like FEMME FATALE is for Brian DePalma, there is nothing wrong with it at all. In fact any fan of Badass Cinema owes it to themselves to see it as one of the only american pictures relevant to our genre this year. It’s an old school cop thriller but for some reason it reminded me most of IN THE LINE OF FIRE. I think one reason Clint has stayed relevant (well, up until now I guess since nobody saw this one) is because he acts his age. He doesn’t pretend to be a young man even if he’s kissing gals who are younger than him. He is very conscious of being an old man.

Blood WorkSo like IN THE LINE OF FIRE his age and health is a big part of the story. It’s based on a novel and apparently Clint had Helgeland write in more health troubles than in the book in order to fit his age better. Chasing down some asshole serial killer, Clint collapses. We cut to a couple years later and he is recovering from a heart transplant. So he’s retired.

But wait! You know he’s going to have to get back in the game somehow. What happens is a young gal tracks him down at his houseboat and shows him a picture of her murdered sister. The sister was an organ donor and this gal has figured out from articles that Clint had to have received her sister’s heart. So she guilts him into looking into this dormant case and seeing if he can solve it.

Of course he ends up getting a little more involved than he wants to. And I don’t want to give anything away but he MAY end up solving the crime. I’m not gonna say whether he does or not definitively but just understand that it IS a possibility that the movie will be about him catching this murderer. Anyway he is sort of a cop because he has all these connections and experience but he is also sort of an outlaw/vigilante because he’s not licensed as a PI and he has to go around asking for favors or misleading people to think he is still a cop.

But the real gimmick is his health. People keep worrying about him, telling him he looks sick and what not. As he gets closer to the killer you worry that he’s going to keel over if he gets in a confrontation. In fact we have it on good word from his heart specialist that he should be staying at home resting, and not working on his boat too much, or his body might reject the transplant. Instead he’s running around trying to fight crime. Sometimes you even hear his heart beat on the soundtrack but you don’t even need that to worry about him. His hair is so grey now, and his voice is so hoarse, and he keeps sweating. In fact I was kind of sad watching this movie, getting that feeling where you know this guy is not going to be around too much longer. He’s not going to be making too many more movies. I mean Clint is getting old.

Luckily I watched the making of documentary and was relieved to see that Clint looks and sounds about 10-15 years younger in real life… he’s actually playing OLDER for the movie. That’s my Clint.

So the story is just ungeneric enough to work and the filmatism of course is solid and effective since it’s Clint’s. No modern bullshit like quick cuts and pop music and he never flies up in the air and does a flip or nothing like that. I noticed one clever filmatic innovation that is a twist on the negative flashes you alway see in the serial killer movies, or at least in the trailers for them. You know what I’m talking about? They show the killer with an evil look on his face and then there’s like a camera flash sound or a whoooosh and for a second you see a negative image of the same shot. Well Clint decided to do the exact opposite, he did an entire nightmare sequence in negative with occasional quick flashes of positive. And it’s much more interesting the backwards way.

There’s also one great badass setpiece, one for the record books. Just pure adrenaline rush badass like when he jumps onto that bus in Dirty Harry or when he foils a bank robbery while eating a hot dog. This time he’s getting in the car with his cop friend and he notices in the rearview mirror a parked car watching them. Instead of telling his friend what’s going on he tells her he needs to put his bag in the trunk. So he gets out, steals her shotgun out of the trunk and starts walking across the street towards the parked car as he cocks it. This is the Oh Shit It’s On Moment. Even if the rest of the movie was pure shit it would’ve been worth watching it for this scene.

Also you gotta hand it to the cast. Because it’s Clint, he’s able to get big name actors in parts they might otherwise turn down. You got Jeff Daniels from that weird ass goose movie playing Clint’s neighbor, sort of his comic relief sidekick who drives him around and claims to be his partner. And more impressive you got Angelica Huston playing his doctor. This is a really good supporting role, but it’s just a doctor. She’s not the love interest or nothing. I’m telling you if it was somebody besides Clint Angelica Huston would not have done the role. But she did and it really adds some weight to the movie I think. Good job Angelica.

You know, a long time ago I remember seeing Jeff Daniels on some talk show talking about the scene in DUMB AND DUMBER where he is humiliated by diarhea in a show house where the toilet turns out to not be hooked up to plumbing. And he told this story about how Clint Eastwood came up to him at a party and told him that scene was hilarious because it had happened to him. I wonder if that’s why he chose Jeff Daniels for this movie. Don’t worry there is no diarhea I just can’t help but think maybe that’s why he chose him. Some kind of bonding.

Anyway the one actor I don’t like in the movie is fuckin Paul Rodriguez, that obnoxious comedian who you can never really figure out how he got famous, since all he is supposed to do is be funny and he can’t even do that. I remember a while back he was criticizing the Taco Bell pooch as being a racist stereotype. I don’t necessarily disagree with that but how are people supposed to take that seriously from a comedian whose entire act is “Ha ha, look at me, I’m Mexican! Get it? Mexican.” I swear to christ, you can check if you don’t believe me, on the making of documentary on the dvd he describes his character as having “a chip on his shoulder. A corn chip.”

Anyway Mr. Rodriguez plays a wisecracking cop and in the opening scene he keeps making bad puns about a murder scene and you’re thinking, uh oh. Fortunately he’s not Clint’s partner or anything – in fact, Clint hates the guy, he’s supposed to be an asshole, and he never gets redeemed. So I guess that makes it okay that he’s in the movie. It turns out okay.

Jazz factor: in this one Clint does not play an instrument or collect jazz records. There is not room on his boat for a piano. However the opening credits are accompanied by some jazz music.

This entry was posted on Saturday, August 10th, 2002 at 2:51 pm and is filed under Action, Crime, Mystery, Reviews, Thriller. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

11 Responses to “Blood Work”

  1. Hey, I know it’s random to be posting on this movie right now, but I just saw this yesterday (liked it quite a bit, not sure why it doesn’t seem to have a very good reputation), and it made me wonder something. I thought I’d check to see if anyone knows anything about this.

    Vern mentions that Anjelica Huston is in this movie in a small role and that she’s very good in it. I couldn’t help but wonder though if there was any tension between her and Clint because of WHITE HUNTER BLACK HEART. If you haven’t seen it, it’s an excellent movie Clint directed and starred in loosely based on the filming of THE AFRICAN QUEEN. In it, Clint plays a character based on Anjelica’s father, the director John Huston. The film is, on the one hand, kind of amused by Huston’s eccentricities and personality, but ultimately it becomes a rather harsh critique of his behavior and his philosophy. The ending in particular is pretty rough on Huston.

    I’m just saying, if someone made a movie about how my dad was an asshole, they might not be my favorite person. But who knows, maybe Anjelica didn’t like her father. Or maybe she didn’t interpret the film as negatively as I did. Or maybe Clint cast her as some sort of apology. Does anyone know anything about this?

  2. my dad recently got a Hair Transplant, it was very expensive but the results are worth it.-*`

  3. Dan, sorry, but I think you’re reading a bit too much into it. Sure it’s an interesting thing to note. But I feel your reading of White Hunter Black Heart is not completely spot on. For starters, how about looking at the film like it’s about a talented but highly egotistical filmmaker with his head up his ass and not specifically about John Houston? And even if you do choose to look at it like a biopic and not as film that’s a critique of big hollywood spending, egos, cost of one man’s stubbornness, the defilement of nature at the hands of a few entitled assholes and all that…why would Angelica have a problem with that? John Houston was quite famous for his extravagances and man’s man ways, so his depiction was pretty on the target. Plus Angelica Houston is a great actress in her own right. Of course she knows and understands her father AND also knows and understands filmmaking and therefore gets where Clint and the film is coming from. So IMO, Angelica probably loved White Hunter Black Heart, loves Clint Eastwood and jumped at the chance to get to play with him in Blood Work. Just my two cents.

    ANd while we’re at it, has Vern ever reviewed White Hunter Black Heart and Bird? Vern you gotta do it bud!

  4. I’ll try to get to some more Clint movies next month. I literally carry a list of his filmography in my wallet to remind me which ones I haven’t reviewed.

  5. I’m surprised Vern hasn’t reviewed KELLY’S HEROES yet.

    how about TIGHTROPE? That was pretty good. And well, THE GAUNTLET might be a choice. How about that mutant Rat movie that Eastwood produced for Sandra Locke (she directed)? (I believe you’ll have to go deep VHS hunting for that one friend.)

    Ebert (usually a staunch Eastwood supporter) described Eastwood at his best for me as simply “Fast, Furious, & Funny.”


  7. onthewall2983 – He reviewed BRIDGES, as part of an interesting live twitter commentary.

  8. The Original Paul

    August 29th, 2015 at 11:28 am

    Well I’ve just watched this one and it’s pretty good. Not anything like as great as UNFORGIVEN but it held my interest and was well put-together. I gotta be honest, even if the whodunnit thing hadn’t been spoilt for me, I would’ve probably guessed it (I did work out the meaning of the numbers clue in the movie a couple of scenes before Clint did). And I saw the “why” coming from very early on. All that not withstanding, my thoughts on this one pretty much exactly match Vern’s.

    And like Vern, the only thing I thought really didn’t work was the Paul Rodriguez character. At the beginning I thought he and Clint would have an interesting relationship where they’d grow a grudging respect for each other over the course of the movie (like Liam Neeson’s character and Riley in NON-STOP, say) but nope, Rodriguez is just a stereotypical asshole cop the entire way through. Dylan Walsh – who looked early on like he’d be Rodriguez’s partner who encourages him to be more on Clint’s side – ended up spending pretty much the entire last half of the movie showing up periodically with zero dialogue of his own. Rodriguez literally gets every bit of dialogue and Walsh is left standing there looking like a third wheel. I get the impression from the early scenes that he wanted to play the character as though he’s more accepting of Clint, but he never gets the chance to do so. He has no voice in this movie. And that’s a shame. Without that voice, it’s all Rodriguez. And Rodriguez’s character really has no business being in this movie.

    That criticism aside, I enjoyed this one. It’s certainly a bit of redemption for Clint as a director in my mind after SUDDEN IMPACT, which is not only one of the worst films I’ve ever seen but also one of the worst-directed. Not that he needed redeeming after he made UNFORGIVEN, of course, but still… SUDDEN IMPACT was enough to make me seriously worried about this one. I needn’t have been. It was an enjoyable watch.

  9. What bugged me most about the contrived, clichéd whodunnit aspect is how needless it was. In the book, the serial killer is just some random asshole. He’s not the guy who kills the family on the boat, either; as best I can recall, that case went completely unsolved.

    I expected better of Helgeland.

  10. The Original Paul

    August 30th, 2015 at 10:35 am

    Matthew B – I kind of agree with you about the contrived part, but it didn’t bother me that much. (We don’t get bothered by the same things apparently!) Maybe it makes a difference that I watched this one knowing from the start who the killer would turn out to be though.

  11. There are traditional drawing-room mysteries where the killer is somebody unexpected from a small pool of characters, and police procedurals where you’ve got a fiendishly clever serial killer leaving puzzles for the cops, and both of those are kind of contrived, but I can handle them on their own. Put them together, though, and I’ll generally wind up thinking, oh, give me a break. I can think of books that pull it off, but not any movies off hand.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>