So once again we have survived.

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three

The first and most important thing that must be said of THE TAKING OF PELHAM ONE TWO THREE is that it has one of the most badass theme songs ever, and without even leaning on the crutch of wah wah guitar. A deep ominous BA-DUMP-BUMP-BUMP alternates with tension building horns and violins or something in a higher pitch… well, I’m dancing about architecture here but trust me, this theme song WILL kick your ass. The score is by David Shire, who strangely has done mostly TV movies but recently did ZODIAC. But it has that catchiness and strutting quality of the best Lalo Schifrin, like ENTER THE DRAGON or something, where after you see the movie you can’t help but walking around picturing it as your theme music.

(By the way, if you watch the original theatrical cut of PAYBACK you can tell that the badass music during the opening montage is inspired by this. They did a good job, but not as good.)

And the movie does a pretty good job of living up to the theme song. It’s directed by Joseph Sargent who is also mainly a TV guy, but the feel is cinematic. Watching it now I realize this must’ve been a huge influence on many of the DIE HARD type movies and especially DIE HARD WITH A VENGEANCE. It doesn’t have the one guy in over his head and physically fighting the bad guys, but the criminal plot, setting, characters, sense of humor and tone are all very DIE HARD.

The Taking of Pelham One Two ThreeA group of men (all wearing matching hats, coats, glasses and mustaches) commandeer a New York subway train. They dump all but one car, keeping the passengers under the watch of some machine guns, and call in to demand $1 million in one hour. If they don’t get it they will begin killing one hostage each minute.

The hero is Walter Matthau, head of the transit police, and he spends most of the movie at headquarters talking to the hostage-takers on the radio and trying to figure out how to stop them while trying to follow their instructions enough to keep them from killing anybody. The lead villain is Robert Shaw as Mr. Blue, who we learn is a mercenary but who Matthau just says is “a fruitcake” because of his accent. Come to think of it he’s kind of like a Grueber… a cold-hearted, European-accented villain with an air of superiority. He has some great lines like when he’s holding a gun on a guy who shot at him and says, “You a cop?” When the guy nods Mr. Blue says “Well done. The mayor will go to your funeral.”

And by the way, yes, this is the movie that had thieves code-named after colors before RESERVOIR DOGS.

Like DIE HARD it is not a comedy, but has you laughing all the time. It’s a serious movie with a wiseass sense of gallows humor. The situation is never played for laughs, but the dialogue between the transit authorities is constantly funny. They all have that New York attitude so while negotiating with these dangerous men they can’t help calling them maniacs or lunatics in the middle of otherwise compliant sentences. They are all quick with insults and with grim jokes about the deep shit they are in. One of Matthau’s colleagues is Jerry Stiller, by the way. So these are regular working class type shlubs, not action heroes. If it was made in the ’80s instead of 1974 Dennis Franz would be in the movie for sure.

And Matthau is fantastic as a hero who mostly works from behind a desk but who, as soon as he sees a window, runs in there himself and takes care of business. It’s believable because Matthau is not exactly a tough guy but he does have some grit, he seems capable.

And as a thriller it’s pretty effective. You have the innocent people in close quarters with scary villains, the city workers in control rooms looking at lights, making phone calls, dramatically assessing the situation. And the suspense about what exactly these guys are planning to do. I mean they must have some plan for escaping, right?

Tony Scott is doing a remake now. I’m not sure if I’ll be watching that after MAN ON FIRE and DOMINO, I’m afraid I might die from his editing. And I guaran-fucking-tee you they won’t match the theme song (I doubt they’ll even make an attempt.) But who knows, maybe it will be good and if not at least it will remind people of the original and get them to watch it. It’s good stuff.

VERN has been reviewing movies since 1999 and is the author of the books SEAGALOGY: A STUDY OF THE ASS-KICKING FILMS OF STEVEN SEAGAL, YIPPEE KI-YAY MOVIEGOER!: WRITINGS ON BRUCE WILLIS, BADASS CINEMA AND OTHER IMPORTANT TOPICS and NIKETOWN: A NOVEL. His horror-action novel WORM ON A HOOK will arrive later this year.
This entry was posted on Friday, May 2nd, 2008 at 10:30 am and is filed under Reviews, Thriller. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “The Taking of Pelham One Two Three”

  1. Just watched it (It’s been on my list forever but now I had nothing to do and the DVD was the closest one to my bed [#2 is be The Abyss]) and I 100% agree with you. Especially with the laughing part. When people talk about this movie, they usually refer to it as a gritty thriller, but damn, I was smiling most of the time and finally burst out in laughter when Matthau opens the door again in the end.

    And I know, I might be the only one here who cares, but it was a nice surprise for me when the gangsters took off their costumes and Mr Brown turned out to be a young Wilson Wilson.

  2. Isn’t it awesome that fucking Walter Matthau got to be a badass in the 70s? Check out Charlie Garrick where he gets to get into shootouts and car chases and bed sexy blondes.

  3. CJ Holden – Never thought about it, but it is funny too.

    Did anyone here see the Tony Scott remake?

    I would have to say that its his best movie in many years. Of course considering how silly MAN ON FIRE and DOMINO and DEJA VU were, that’s not exactly high praise.

    The original was, as everyone else says, is a tightly-wound thriller with some good laughs. Truely a clean cut, outstanding role model for all those young thrillers growing up about. The remake tries to re-invent itself or whatever 2009 Hollywood pseudo-babble, and its just….not bad. Not good either. Somewhat watchable, but completely disposable.

    More than anything else, Robert shaw in the original was just a bad guy. Not a movie bad guy, big difference. No bullshit, he means his lethal guarantee of word, no stupid monologues, etc. But if you like all that, Travolta in PELHAM will satisfy that obligatory urge.

  4. Haven’t seen the remake yet. I wait till it hits DVD over here. (And I liked Deja Vu. It’s far from being logical [Time travel movie] and it takes exactly 45 minutes until something interesting happens, but then it’s a very entertaining popcorn thriller.)

  5. Vern – Have you seen Hopscotch? Another great Matthau movie that verges on action. He gets to play another character with wit and cunning though its more humorous than 1-2-3.

  6. Based on a book by the author of DEATH WISH.

  7. I liked HOPSCOTCH. It doesn’t have that 70’s groove to it like this or CHARLEY VARRICK, but it’s quite clever.

    I said my piece on the original in the remake’s review here, but I liked this a hell of a lot. Vern makes a good point on how this is probably a more direct influence on DIE HARD than anything else. Kino is releasing a special edition Blu-ray very soon, which I’ll definitely get my hands on.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <img src=""> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <b> <i> <strike> <em> <strong>