"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma

TEENAGE SEX AND DEATH AT CAMP MIASMA is the third movie from writer/director Jane Schoenbrun. I haven’t seen WE’RE ALL GOING TO THE WORLD’S FAIR (2021), but I did see I SAW THE TV GLOW (2024), which was released by A24 to great acclaim and adulation.

I confess I didn’t get that one. Didn’t even feel qualified to review it. I love its look, and I was impressed by its creation of a ‘90s tv show called The Pink Opaque that its characters are obsessed with. It’s like the show Videodrome would make in response to the popularity of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. But I struggled with watching Justice Smith, who was so charismatic on The Get Down, play such a charmless, passive lead. I’ve read that’s because it’s a trans allegory and the character is repressed, and that’s another thing: there is no way on earth that I would know this was a trans allegory without reading about it. It’s interesting to read about, and it’s a movie that means so much to so many (including plenty of cis people I know), but I simply can’t decode it. I can appreciate the vibes, but in that case it wasn’t enough.

CAMP MIASMA is another trans allegory, but it’s more on my frequency. Maybe some of the very specialized things it’s about are also more universal, or maybe it’s just that it’s funnier. But it sure doesn’t hurt that it’s about slasher movies. Up and coming young indie director Kris Williams (Hannah Einbinder, Hacks) has been hired to reboot a long-running, now moribund summer camp slasher series called CAMP MIASMA. The opening credits have a very detailed montage of franchise history, with 14 movies that mostly line up with the FRIDAY THE 13TH sequels, except there’s a Christmas one and an ARMY OF DARKNESS one and I think a HALLOWEEN 6 thorn cult reference. The most important inspiration, though, is SLEEPAWAY CAMP, with the killer’s psychosis attributed to being raised as both a boy and a girl. Kris says they hired her, a known lesbian, in a cynical attempt to launder the problematicness out of the i.p.

Still trying to come up with a story, Kris goes to a snowy town near Washington’s Canadian border to meet with Billy Presley (Gillian Anderson, JOHNNY ENGLISH REBORN), the reclusive star of the original CAMP MIASMA. Though she turned down the sequels, she’s so attached to the series that she lives in the summer camp where it was filmed. Never got past it, you could say. (This makes me think of when I went to the first, poorly-attended Seattle Crypticon and saw poor Betsy Palmer sitting alone at a table with her sweater from FRIDAY THE 13TH.)

This is a weird movie with some choppings and blood geysers and what not, but it’s mostly a story about these two women of different generations eating candy and discussing movies and sexual hangups while attracted to each other. Also Billy is a weirdo who claims that the killer from the movies, Little Death (Jack Haven, QUEENS OF THE DEAD), is real and lives at the bottom of the lake. You know – by the hole that the movies come out of. Obviously.

(When we see Little Death’s lair it’s a corporate-looking video store with a carpet pattern that might as well be an occult rune the way it transports us to a specific movie experience of the past.)

Kris has gotta be semi-autobiographical for Schoenbrun, having done a low budget movie that she says critics didn’t even like that much but that was academic and queer enough to help her get this opportunity. She’s what they used to call “pretentious” or “an artsy-fartsy type.” She talks about her work in academic terms, writes down “DESIRE” in her notebook while watching a sex scene from CAMP MIASMA VI as research, talks about not wanting to do just another CAMP MIASMA sequel, oblivious to how dismissive that might sound to the actor only known for being in that movie. But I like that in 2026 that doesn’t preclude her from also being a fan.

Because I’m slasher-entrenched, some of the meta ones rub me the wrong way. I couldn’t stand BEHIND THE MASK: THE RISE OF LESLIE VERNON, and couldn’t finish THE FINAL GIRLS, which felt like it was made by people who had not yet had time to watch a horror movie, but felt confident they knew all they needed to know from the parody commercials they’d seen. Schoenbrun is a real one judging from the worldbuilding of the fictional franchise, the references to Pamela Springsteen and Freddy’s wall of souls (R.I.P. Screaming Mad George), and from them including TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE: THE NEXT GENERATION and the PSYCHO remake on a list of influences. I was so impressed that they have a joke about who created THE BURNING and didn’t feel the need to explain it. (I was the only dork who laughed.)

But as Billy tells Kris, there’s more to life and/or movies than rattling off trivia. I’m fascinated by the generational differences between Billy and Kris, who texts to her girlfriend (Jasmin Savoy Brown, SCREAM [2022]) that Billy is more Gen-X than she expected. When they watch CAMP MIASMA together, in the scene where the counselors tell the origin story of Little Death, Kris blurts out “This part is really transphobic,” and Billy tells her to shut up. They’re both right.

Billy says CAMP MIASMA is only about “flesh and fluids.” She feels slasher movies viscerally, as a thing she experienced in real time, instead of as a past artifact to be dissected and interpreted. But it’s not as if Kris doesn’t know how to feel CAMP MIASMA deeply – she vividly remembers seeing it too young as an experience that shaped her sexuality. She’s obsessed with a look young Billy gives in the sex scene, and literally haunted by another facial expression that you’ll recognize if you’ve seen SLEEPAWAY CAMP. There is a power to these movies she can’t put her finger on, let alone imprison inside her academic terminology.

Schoenbrun read Carol J. Clover’s Men Women and Chainsaws around the same age I did, they use the term “final girl” and some of the noted tropes, but they aren’t stuck on “the rules” like SCREAM and its copycats. So much analysis of the genre focuses on the sex = death connotations of HALLOWEEN and its imitators, the accidental or cultural or propagandistic sex negativity: don’t do drugs, don’t have sex, or the boogie man will get you. I appreciate many of the modern slasher movies for going out of their way to demolish that pattern, with female protagonists who can enjoy sex and not be punished or shamed for it by some murderer or some dumb movie. And this movie about middle aged sex and death points out that in 2026 a lady rolling a joint is not prurient, it’s just another thing she likes to do, like listening to Sade while lighting the candles around the bed.

By continuing their theme of pop culture as a portal to find one’s true self through, Schoenbrun has come closer to Clover’s thesis than any of those other movies. The concept of the final girl was not just “there’s a girl who survives at the end,” it was that this subgenre wasn’t as misogynistic as its reputation since the males in the audience were identifying with the final girl, sharing her fear, rooting for her to survive. For Billy to get her performance and for Kris to get past her sexual hangups, they have to switch their perspective to the killer’s, watch themselves outside of their bodies.

This one is original in how much it just lets sex = death and just be okay with it, up to and including naming the killer after an orgasm. In this movie, for some reason, death won’t kill you any more than sex will. (A reclaiming of… being killed?) Kris is almost literally reborn, alive and safe in the form of a final girl in public wearing only panties and a tight crop top, covered in blood, but completely transformed, confident, strutting around like a tiger. We all wish we could be so comfortable.

Kris probly likes I SAW THE TV GLOW more than Billy does. Is it too much of a generalization to say that millennials and Gen-Zers are more open to “vibes based” movies than my generation? Storytelling is not God if memes and Youtube clips were as important to your childhood as Spielberg movies. We loved David Lynch first, obviously, but once you guys found out about him you were so excited we had to let you have him.

I think both generations kind of win here when Schoenbrun does the Lynch thing of going to places that don’t make any literal sense and may not even have a specific intended meaning. Kris tells a column of Hollywood dipshits in a Zoom meeting that no, she is not making a meta movie “like NEW NIGHTMARE by frightmaster Wes Craven.” Little Death is real, watching them, they’re the movie. I choose to take that literally, but I couldn’t explain to you how it works. If we all just go with it then millennials get their vibes and Billy gets to feel instead of analyze.

Perspective and gaze seem to interest both Clover and Schoenbrun, though in different ways. I like how the show-stopping CAMP MIASMA excerpt uses first person perspective. Real slasher movies use a killer’s POV to unnerve us, making us complicit in spying on the unknowing victim from outside their window. But this is not a pastiche, it’s an anachronistic song montage of a wronged ghost avenging his tormenters. I think of it as a poetic interpretation of watching an old movie and siding with the monster when you weren’t really supposed to.

SCREAM speaks to those of us who love horror movies a little too much, but this speaks to the much more advanced horror experience of wrestling with “problematic” movies from the past. That’s a true horror fan – you know it’s fucked up but you still like it! I remember years ago a gay-themed cable network (Logo I think?) was showing SLEEPAWAY CAMP for Halloween and I couldn’t understand why they would celebrate such a horrendous depiction of gender confusion. But I get it now. They’re reclaiming it. You tried to demonize us but it won’t work, because we’ll have fun relating to that demon. It’s ours now. Why not? I like the irony that for the outmoded depiction of gender dysphoria Schoenbrun recruited actual trans actor Jack Haven.

Genre definitions are subjective and unimportant, but to me this isn’t a horror movie, because it’s not trying to scare anybody. It’s using horror imagery as a language to get to an idea about sexual discovery. From what I understand, the central idea (leading to the climax, the little death with Little Death) represents a trans experience of learning to enjoy sex by finally feeling like you’re in the right body. That’s really cool to have something so particular for people to relate to, and for the rest of us I think there are other ways to read it, and plenty of other ideas to chew on, both analytically and poetically.

For me TEENAGE SEX AND DEATH AT CAMP MIASMA was an excellent cinematic experience. It’s even more beautiful looking than Schoenbrun’s last movie, with a dreamy artificial style. It’s shot on film and I got to see it projected on film, which was appropriate for the topics of ‘80s horror and cinema worship. It has some laughs, both in the jokes and in seeing an audience get a little befuddled. It’s not for everybody, but it’s for alot of different types of people, and I’m happy to be one of them.

This entry was posted on Thursday, August 27th, 2026 at 6:14 pm and is filed under Reviews, Comedy/Laffs, Horror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

18 Responses to “Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma”

  1. This is good news!

    We discussed I SAW THE TV GLOW a little bit in one of these threads awhile back — I forget which one — and I had mentioned that I thought it was a clunky, at times heavy-handed, badly written, pretty badly acted, and generally massively overrated slog. I also was underwhelmed by WE’RE ALL GOING TO THE WORLD’S FAIR–more understated, less clunky, less of an A24 darling, so less to be annoyed by–but still kind of a nothingburger. But hope springs eternal, and this one looks at least more balls out and fun. I’m a little leery that some of what I’ve heard (e.g., the slasher’s name is “Little Death” ~ “orgasm”) following the pattern from TV GLOW of Schoenbrum being decidedly unsubtle and making subtext text. Unlike Vern, I thought the trans allegory aspects of TV GLOW had all the subtlety and nuance of a 2×4 across the face. Certain things I’ve heard about this give me some of those same vibes. Make a great and completely unsubtle trans-centric movie or make a great but very subtle, allegorical trans-subtext movie. I’ll give it a whirl–just make it good.

    Still and all, this one at least looks like it wants to have fun, plus there’s a slasher element, plus I like that Schoenbrum has some novel thematic interests and desire to experiment w/ various kinds of horror-adjacent sub-genres and storytelling styles. I want them to keep trying weird stuff, and I want some of it to actually live up to the hype and be an unambiguous winner for me. So, I’m definitely going to check this one out, though this one may wait til streaming.

  2. This also reminded me of how Final Girls seemed condescendingly ignorant of horror movies. Camp Miasma knows and even as a cis man I appreciate how participating in the (metaphorical?) kill spree reflects how personally we absorb movies. Frankly movies coming out of a hole in a lake makes more sense than Hollywood.

  3. I Saw the TV Glow partially inspired the series of mental breakdowns i had throughout 2024. in just about every element it seemed directly taken from my own life, an unauthorized biographical record, up to and including the episodes months before i saw it in which i began waking up after every 90 minute REM cycle, lying in pools of sweat and screaming about how i was imminently going to die. i understand and accept that my paranoia isn’t reflective of reality but the peers i surrounded myself with also didn’t fail to note the resemblances between my own life and that of the events depicted in that fictional film and nothing about its existence ended up making my life easier. it ultimately became another set of slightly misshapen signifiers for said peers who ultimately pushed me to come out as trans before i was ready to do so on my terms. i love that film dearly but if i could erase every memory of it from the minds of everyone else who saw it i don’t think i would hesitate to.

    films like Sleepaway Camp only need reclaiming in the eyes of people whose existences aren’t unceasing, confused, angry shouts about worlds they don’t fit into. if a work seems to be a transgressive shadow thrashing outside of the bounds of current social mores then there will always be someone out there who can see it and appreciate it for what it is. it just takes the rest of the world time to come around on it.

  4. Skani – could little death have a double meaning. I’ve not seen this film yet, was going to watch it last night but watched The Christophers instead, could the litany of fear be relevant here though?

    I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

  5. Damn, suddenly Lynch’s (well deserved) career resurgence in his last few years in this dimension now makes so much sense to me. OF COURSE a generation that was raised on memes, anti-humor and overall weirdness would find the beauty in someone who isn’t trying to make art that pleases conventional audience anticipations. They wouldn’t tell him that he has his head up his ass because they are unable to decipher what his intentions were, but instead enjoy the unsettling vibe that it gave them and/or laugh with him in all the right moments!

  6. (Just assume I didn’t try to use the “blockquote cite” command and it went wrong. See it as some kind of attempt at Lynchian strangeness.)

  7. Makes a good double with SPIDER-MAN BRAND NEW DAY in that both

    SPOILER ALERT

    prominently feature geometric air vents!
    V-MAX in SPIDER-MAN and Little Death’s mask in CAMP MIASMA.

  8. Best review I’ve read of this movie. Keep doin’ what you’re doin’, Vern!

  9. “Is it too much of a generalization to say that millennials and Gen-Zers are more open to “vibes based” movies than my generation? Storytelling is not God if memes and Youtube clips were as important to your childhood as Spielberg movies. We loved David Lynch first, obviously, but once you guys found out about him you were so excited we had to let you have him.”

    I actually had the opposite perspective. For at least the first half, the movie explicitly spells out its ideas and influences in the dialogue, because nowadays nothing can be left open to interpretation or inference.

    A movie or show has to overstate its plot points so that people half-watching while on their phone won’t go online and complain that the story made no sense. It has to articulate its themes very unsubtly so that it isn’t willfully misinterpreted and accused of being offensive. I liked the movie’s ideas and themes, but I might have liked them more if the script didn’t feel the need to state out loud the similarities to SUNSET BOULEVARD and SLEEPAWAY CAMP before petty online trolls can accuse the movie of plagiarism.

    To me this was much closer to the SCREAM model of “let’s constantly talk about other movies and point out our influences before the audience does” than the MULHOLLAND DRIVE model of “let’s just do our own strange inscrutable thing and let the audience work it out.” Although casting MULHOLLAND DRIVE’s Patrick Fischler in a small role was a nice gesture towards the latter.

    On a more positive note, the 1980s movie-within-a-movie includes a major character with a giant mohawk, played (the character, not the mohawk) by Eva Victor and bearing the character name DJ Ella Giastic. This character makes CAMP MIASMA an important film that should be seen by everyone.

    Also this is the rare non-superhero movie to have a post-credits scene. It’s just a brief funny joke, but it went over well with the audience I saw this with. So if y’all haven’t seen this movie yet and you dig that kind of thing, be sure to stay in your seat.

  10. I think younger audiences not paying attention to the screen is both why they are more open to vibes AND prefer to have the themes and plot points spelled out for them. You don’t need to give vibes your full attention; you can just sort of soak them in while doomscrolling, listening to the ambient drone on the score, knowing that if anything actually happens, someone will explain it to you in dialogue so you’ll you know when to look up from your phone. Narrative requires active viewer participation That’s too much like work. Easier to let the soundtrack do the heavy lifting.

    I hate vibes. I crave dynamic incident. I’m as prone to second-screening as anyone else in this cursed age, so I want a movie that forces me to pay attention, not one that encourages me to drift off and then feeds me the Wikipedia summary of what I missed every 10 minutes.

    I’m down with what this movie’s about but I doubt I’d be able to tolerate how it’s about it. I’m completely on the side of Gen Z politically. It’s just their aesthetics I can’t stand. I hate the way their movies look and sound and move. It’s very cool that the slasher genre is being reclaimed by different groups than the same old sweaty straight white guys, and as such I accept that these groups are not obligated to make slashers in the same old sweaty straight white guy style. This is their own shit and I’m happy to let them enjoy it. This is a clear case of Not For Me.

  11. Sure, it’s not Lynch-like that Kris discusses the themes of her movie, and those are also things Schoenbrun wants us to ponder (which I think is also a self-deprecating joke about over-analyzing). But I’m talking about the story, the entire shift in reality and what happens to them. I don’t think it can make sense literally. I don’t think there are “rules” to how it works. And its symbolic meaning is up to interpretation.

  12. The discussion of ‘vibes’ is making me chuckle, as after I entered DA BACKROOMZ someone was asking what I thought. I said that while I liked what the movie was shooting for, it ultimately did way too many things I kinda hated. When they asked for an example, I cited the sequence where Chiwetel Ejiofor walks around and looks at yellow wallpaper while a synth drones for seemingly 20 minutes.

    They responded “Oh, come on. That was for VIBES” (and they weren’t joking)

  13. I guess it is Lynchian and MULHOLLAND DRIVE-esque in that the more articulated narrative elements of the first half get discarded as the movie slips sideways into abstraction by the end. (And the fact that it centers around a lesbian relationship on the edge of the film industry.)

    I liked the atmosphere and a lot of other things about the movie, it’s just that the on-the-nose self-awareness was a bit much for me. I SAW THE TV GLOW managed to avoid that, and I liked that movie, so does it make any sense that I liked this one more while also being disappointed more?

    I would compare I SAW THE TV GLOW to RESERVOIR DOGS in the sense that it didn’t seem to be a big hit, but enough of the right people saw it that its director’s follow-up was highly anticipated. The showing of CAMP MIASMA that I went to was pretty packed, and by the end of the credits there were enough people still in their seats for the post-credits scene to get a big laugh.

    I wonder if the aging grumps who still keep saying “nobody goes to the movies anymore” or “everything is superheroes now” will ever catch on to how many zeitgeist-capturing horror movies there have been in recent years such as THE SUBSTANCE, BACKROOMS, OBSESSION, and now CAMP MIASMA. Even the Oscar-bait costume-drama genre has recently included adaptations of NOSFERATU and FRANKENSTEIN. My guess is no, they will not.

  14. I really, really like I SAW THE TV GLOW, even as a very vanilla straight white guy. I can still empathise. But also, it’s universal enough to reflect a sort of existential angst that’s been a constant presence in my life since I was a teen.

    This one… I have to admit I rolled my eyes hard at the name of the killer, and found a lot of things a little clunky and too didactic. But that also happened to me, to a much lesser extent, on I SAW THE TV GLOW. This one had me annoyed a little longer, until I figured out what it was going for, and then it won me over. It helps that it’s pretty damn funny, pretty to look at, and very horror-literate.
    I personally think if we allow horror comedies within horror this one should count too, but… this one *is* harder to include within the genre, because even the premise is not about trying to be a horror movie, even a funny one; It’s a very, very cute comedy about getting to grips with your kinks. It just happens to be a love letter to a horror subgenre, and the slasher sequences are all about fantasy fulfilment… not as an undercurrent – that’s all they are here.

  15. Majestyk, good points, but on the other hand, there’s evidence that it’s the same Gen Z who’s currently leading the charge back to theatres.

    They made OBSESSION & BACKROOMS the huge hits they became. They were also a sizeable audience for the blockbusters THE ODYSSEY & PROJECT HAIL MARY . They needed movies they could call their own. The only franchise IPs that made bank were those that parents could comfortably bring their kids to (MARIO BROS, MINIONS & MONSTERS) and those that have been re-booted enough times over the last decade to still be fresh in the public consciousness (SPIDER-MAN).

    This is the year a freaking STAR WARS movie bombed! BOMBED!!! Something unthinkable even 10 years ago. They were event movies you dressed up as Vader or Luke and waved plastic light sabers around in the theatre.

    And then you think about it, what does STAR WARS mean to Gen-Z? A last theatrical movie that came out 7 years ago, the end of a trilogy generally acknowledged as uneven with it’s concluding episode widely derided as bad. Since then SW has existed as one of the 500,000 streaming shows on Disney, and the general consensus among the Gen Z-ers must have been, “Why should I pay for a theatrical version of a show I can catch on streaming, one that had 2 decent seasons and a last one that was plain average about some dude in a helmet that kinda looks like ANOTHER dude with a helmet who had a bit part in a trilogy and the infant version of another character in the same trilogy my FATHER watched a half a century ago ?”

    MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE bombed. Who was the target audience for this? Did they expect the Zoomers to troop into cinemas for a big screen adaptation of a cartoon that was popular 2 generations from theirs? And what? Break into simultaneous applause at the Dolph Lundgren cameo? BTW, I did a pop quiz with 4 zoomers, a nephew, a niece and 2 colleagues asking them if they knew who Dolph Lundgren was and I drew 4 blanks. One finally got it when I described his character in AQUAMAN, the nearest frame of reference. The 1st AQUAMAN is now 8 years old.

    So, it’s time studios pulled their heads out of their asses and stopped pandering to Gen X nostalgia cause they’re not the ones putting sufficient bums on sufficient seats. The Zoomers are driving this, which is doubly interesting for a generation usually accused of being incapable of focusing on a movie for more than 10 minutes before checking out their Insta, X and TikTok feeds.

    Sorry for rambling, but Majestyk’s comments just sparked this conversation inside my head, that I quite tiresomely needed to share:-)

  16. I agree with all that. I don’t want to watch Gen Z’s movies, but I’m thrilled that they might finally make the studios stop dragging the increasingly shoddily reanimated corpses of the same seven or eight franchises out of their graves over and over again. I want my childhood favorites to rest in peace. I want new shit. Ideally, it would be new shit that wouldn’t make me want to stab myself in the eyes and ears with a shrimp fork. But for the good of cinema, I’ll take new shit I’m not the slightest bit interested in that appeals to new generations over nostalgiabait bullshit that panders to mine. If it takes vibes and Themes For Dummies dialogue to get The Youth interested in film, then so be it.

  17. I am a Schoenbrun hater at this point and this movie really did not change my mind (and, I must note, is another movie by them about being trans feminine where none of the main characters are trans women), but it did lead to me showing three trans non-slasher fans Sleepaway Camp which is probably the most fun I’ve had watching movies all year. They don’t make them like they used to!

  18. In defense of vibe cinema, film got started as a medium of visuals without narratives. There’s a reason why people refer to films that de-emphasize narrative and character in favor of sight and sound as “pure cinema.”

    I’m what they once called Geriatric Millennial, which means while I technically am a Millennial, all of my cultural touchstones growing up overlapped with Gen X. And it seems like Schoenbrun is in a similar age category, which might be why their films seem to resonate with me. They’re very much nostalgic for a mid to late 90s culture and that first decade or so of the internet. I haven’t seen Camp Miasma yet, but it does seem to be about the next generation reacting to art made for the previous generation. And I do remember thinking of all those 80s horror slasher films as something like these ancient texts that get passed down. They’re sort of like a rite of passage. At the same time, they don’t seem made for you exactly, which means there’s always a distance between you and the film.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>