"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Blue Moon

BLUE MOON is one of Richard Linklater’s two 2025 joints, the one that’s in English and that he didn’t sell to Netflix and that was nominated for two Oscars (actor and original screenplay). At a glance it doesn’t sound like the most typical Linklater picture, because it’s about the songwriter Lorenz Hart when his partner Richard Rodgers has just started a successful new team with Oscar Hammerstein II. But when you see it it turns out it’s very Linklater, because it’s basically a one location play starring Ethan Hawke (like TAPE) and because it’s all about listening to a weirdo carry on and show off blabbing about all the random shit he’s obsessed with (like SLACKER or WAKING LIFE).

It’s basically a bittersweet hangout movie, spending a couple hours at a bar with Hart (Ethan Hawke, 24 HOURS TO LIVE) on March 31, 1943, opening night of Rodgers & Hammerstein’s Oklahoma!. He ruminates on his past, his current failure, his dreams of how to continue, what’s going on with this war in Europe, and many of his opinions about many different things. Also he’s really excited because he thinks he’s in love with a Yale art student he’s been corresponding with who’s going to meet him here. But mostly he just tries to hold court and receive the attention he desires before Rodgers and friends show up to celebrate their triumph without him.

There are a bunch of characters who come in and out of Sardi’s, but two who are there the whole time are the staff – bartender Eddie (Bobby Cannavale, MAXXXINE) and piano player Morty (Jonah Lees, SUPERMAN). Cannavale is outstanding in a role that includes some great banter but that’s even funnier when it’s just reacting, or trying not to react, trying to ignore this guy and do work. Or trying to stop serving him, because he’s supposedly gotten sober, but that’s definitely not sticking tonight. Morty is a soldier on leave and a talented newbie musician greatly honored to meet Hart and play some of his songs for him. At the same time he’s clearly seeing this as the night he might meet Richard Rodgers. He also helps inform us, the audience, when he plays pieces of Rodgers & Hart’s most famous tunes as they try to explain to the flower delivery guy (Giles Surridge) who this is sitting at the bar trying to flirt with him.

Lorenz talks about his own songs, claims “Blue Moon” isn’t that good, tells stories about what he wanted the lyrics to be but they wouldn’t let him. He talks about what he says are the “best line” in various shows and movies, including CASABLANCA. He pitches ideas for shows he’s convinced are brilliant but thankfully I don’t think we need to agree with him. He’s salty enough to talk shit about the desperation of titles with exclamation points, like Oklahoma!. (This was before AIRPLANE! or EVERYBODY WANTS SOME!!.) He talks about why he walked out of Oklahoma! (or supposedly why) and damns it with faint praise about how huge it’s going to be. He says so many things that made me think, “Yeah, I know this type of dude.” He’s full of shit, he’s obnoxious, but also funny, kinda fun, sometimes correct, I can see why they kinda like him and why they put up with him even though he’s obviously exhausting.

He talks so much shit and then when Rodgers (Andrew Scott, VICTOR FRANKENSTEIN) and Hammerstein (Simon Delaney, THE CONJURING 2) show up he totally kisses their asses about what a work of genius it it is. Congratulations, bravo, all that. He plays the part of the gracious ex-partner proud of his friend’s success, and Rodgers plays along at first but he can see through it, or at least starts to when they’re talking about potentially working together again. Richard seems to genuinely want to make it work, but when he reiterates what he would need (like working normal hours) Lorenz can’t help but toss in some of his little digs, and Richard can’t let all of them slide. He’s already put up with too much in this partnership.

Also he keeps trying to go celebrate with his other friends and Lorenz keeps having one other thing he needs to talk to him about. It’s stressful.

The other major matter of business is that Yale student, Elizabeth Weiland (Margaret Qualley, HONEY DON’T!), who’s not even half his age and also a woman, and therefore not usually his type. But he says he’s “omnisexual” and you can see why he’s enamored of her because she’s Margaret Qualley and she’s a poet and an artist and she talks to him like he’s one of her girlfriends. Gossips about boys, even. Maybe she really doesn’t know his feelings for her, or doesn’t admit it to herself. He once spent a weekend with her and nothing like that happened but he definitely read some things into it that we’re thinking she must not have. Eddie says she just thinks he can help her career. She definitely wants him to introduce her to Richard, and she’s nervous about it.

I feel so embarrassed for Lorenz here, but I sort of get it. This would be wrong because of the mentor relationship, and stupid because at only 20 she’s clearly too young to relate to him. But in middle age I understand more why people get delusional shit like that in their heads. I’m not that old, I’m still viable, I’m still relevant, I’m still desirable! Remember when that novelist left his wife ‘cause he thought he was in love with his email friend Natalie Portman, but Natalie wasn’t on the same page? I think it’s normal to have a certain amount of longing for unattainable/incompatible romance – “a dream in my heart,” to quote a famous song – but if you have an ego like that writer or like Lorenz here there’s a danger you’ll decide the fantasy is reality. I feel bad for him. He takes it pretty well though. It’s just one of his illusions about himself that’s being crushed tonight.

What I really like about this role is that Hawke is taking on a character really different from his typical ones – period, gay, stage musical oriented, combover, also I didn’t mention that they do a bunch of Hobbit-vision type tricks because he’s supposed to be five feet tall – and yet he’s also just that same Ethan Hawke that we love. You know, he starts talking, he gets real passionate, has his collection of clever observations to run through, we’ve seen it in the BEFORE trilogy, in BOYHOOD, in REALITY BITES. It’s like how his TRAINING DAY trainer Denzel played Macbeth and made all the Shakespearean dialogue sound so Denzel, and that’s why it works.

On paper Lorenz Hart is not an Ethan Hawke role. On screen it absolutely is. It’s amazing how well it works. So the Oscar nomination (which is his fifth total, but third for acting, and first in the lead category) is well deserved both for the specific role and for a career that really deserves more accolades (especially since he got snubbed on FIRST REFORMED).

Trivia: The illusions to make Hawke look short were devised by Latham Gaines, his friend and score composer, who’s also an inventor and also played Mesogog, the lead villain of Power Rangers Dino Thunder. Latham’s father Charles invented paintball and narrated PUMPING IRON (based on his book). His sister Greta was the first women’s snowboarding champion.

The also Oscar-nominated script is by Robert Kaplow, author of the novel that became Linklater’s ME AND ORSON WELLES. The credits say the movie is inspired by letters between Hart and Weiland. According to USA Today and Time, Kaplow bought carbon copies of around a dozen letters from a used bookseller (hopefully not one that buys from the CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME? lady), but “they suggest more than they say.” Like she’ll “suggest that she and Hart went away for a weekend in Vermont, but she doesn’t actually say what happened.” So he’s filling in the blanks with dramatic license. The true story was probly more mundane.

I’m a little torn on this nomination because for the most part I think it’s well deserved. Screenwriting isn’t only about dialogue, not at all, but one that does so much with so many words is in fact impressive. On the other hand there is one brief little thing – well, a couple different incidents of the same sort of thing – that I found so egregious, so groan-inducing, I was honestly in disbelief that it was put into the script and then people agreed to keep it in the script and then they filmed it and then they left it in the movie and released the movie. See, there’s this gimmick that there’s a guy sitting at a table nearby who Lorenz tries to rope into his conversation, then he realizes he recognizes him from seeing his picture somewhere, then he figures out he’s E.B. White (Patrick Kennedy, WAR HORSE), and he really lights up, talks to him about one of his essays, treats him as a respected peer, tries to impress him and talk shop. That’s all complete fiction and I don’t care, it’s an interesting scenario. The part I object to is when E.B. confesses he’s trying to write a children’s book but he only knows the themes and not the story or characters (how does that work?) and then Lorenz tells him about a mouse he keeps catching in his apartment who he named Stuart. As if that’s not bad enough we even see E.B. write it down in his notebook. Eureka! I don’t know if we’ve seen something that corny in an Oscar nominated film since the Mike Meyers cameo in BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY.

There are a couple smaller characters who we’re meant to realize “oh shit, that’s [famous guy] before he was famous” and the worst one is Elizabeth’s friend who wants to be a director and his name is George Hill and Lorenz advises him to tell stories about friendship. Jesus christ. Jee-zus chee-rist. I couldn’t believe it.

Time described these Gumpian bits as “Easter eggs for savvy students of cultural history.” Kaplow described them to USA Today as “making it a musical fable.” My wife described them to me as “E.B., it’s your cousin, Marvin. You know that mouse you’ve been looking for?” I genuinely question whether this very good screenplay should be barred from awards contention for that handful of misdeeds. I don’t know the answer.

But it certainly didn’t kill the movie for me, it just sours a few minutes of an otherwise good hang. It’s worth it just to watch Hawke go to town, and also I just like seeing this guy excited to talk about stories and words and music. As an artist it’s scary to think about getting to a point where nobody else seems to care anymore about the type of art you want to make. As a human it’s scary to think about getting old and past certain life experiences and possibly running out of time altogether, like he is here. BLUE MOON is sad and clever and beautiful, like some of Hart’s songs. It should be called BLUE MOON! though.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 10th, 2026 at 7:21 am and is filed under Reviews, Comedy/Laffs, Drama, Music. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

9 Responses to “Blue Moon”

  1. I loved this so much and sat through long stretches of it with a big goofy grin on my face. I would never in a million years have thought of Hawke for this role but he’s spectacular. Both he and Kaplow deserve their nominations, and Hawke deserves to win (although of course he won’t).

  2. That was a great joke from your wife

  3. Let’s not forget that Moby also believed he’d been in a relationship with Natalie Portman, when she was 18 and he was in his 30s. He recalls dating, making out, etc. She recalls hanging out a couple times before she realized he was creepy. If our marriage hadn’t been ironclad all these years, I might get jealous about these weirdos, but I obviously do get the attraction.

  4. I was absolutely loving this movie until for some reason I hit a wall when they were in the coat room. I was blown away by Hawke’s performance. I loved the characters just hanging out in the bar shooting the shit. I don’t know why I suddenly lost steam. I honestly don’t know if something in the story or characters lost me or if it was just that I hit my time limit for a movie in which not much happens. I still think it’s a great movie, but it did come down a little for me at the end.

  5. I enjoyed this one because I love talky Hawke/Linklater joints. I agree the Forrest Gump moments rankle, but I also see the whole movie as the equivalent of the tall tales with which the short Hart regales his captive audience here. They’re all at least half-bullshit, but there’s some truth in it.

  6. I thought the movie was excellent. I was somehow unaware that it was a Linklater movie until the end credits, but the second I saw his name it made sense. Hangout movie is a good way to describe it. And it goes on the shelf next to Rear Window as a rare movie that mostly takes place in just one room and we wouldn’t have it any other way. Hawke nails his performance and is mostly mesmerizing to listen to, and Bobby Cannavale was perfect in it as my favorite of Lorenz’s conversation partners.

    I feel awful for Robert Kaplow, though. This should have been a triumph: he wrote a compelling original screenplay about an in interesting subject that been overlooked for a long time, infused it with lively and bright dialogue, was blessed with a talented director and cast to bring it to life, and picked up an Oscar nomination for his writing.

    On the other hand, Kaplow must so regret his hacky (but unspoken) reference to EB White’s later authorship of Stuart Little, and the three second inclusion of a young George Hill. At first blush I thought these were harmless, fleeting touches that wouldn’t interfere with any sane person’s enjoyment of the film (and in White’s case, actually kind of subtle; we only see him jot a note for a second after hearing the mouse story, but there is no dialogue or closing epilogue graphics saying anything about Stuart Little or any of White’s eventual children’s works). I stand corrected, though:these were pandering concessions to the dummies and sentimentalists that were so embarrassing we shouldn’t believe they made it into the movie. What bad luck to have collaborators as gifted as Linklater and Hawke, that even they failed to rescue the film from these disastrous, impure, choices. As much as I appreciate how well this movie worked as a whole, we have to take it seriously and speak up when a film includes three to four seconds of inessential material that doesn’t align perfectly with our own personal tastes. This must be a bittersweet time for Kaplow. He has some growing up to do.

  7. Apologies for the length here.

    I actually didn’t mind the winking around the E.B. White character either, primarily because the biggest winks served thematic purposes. It’s dumb that the script needs to go so far as having Hart spell out Stuart’s first name, dialogue that was probably underlined and bolded in the script, but the conversation between White and Hart was, I think, great. I was more annoyed by Weegee being the photographer and being called out by name, but at least Weegee didn’t come over to Hart and say he related to Hart because he was interested in the work of this younger photographer DIANE ARBUS or anything.

    I’ve read a lot of White’s work but wasn’t clear on where he would have been in his life on the night Blue Moon takes place, and the revelation that White, feeling as low as Hart, was about to write one of the biggest children’s books ever (and then write an even bigger one after that) while Hart was going to die within the year, was such a gut punch. White already has the critical respect Hart has, but he’s going to cross over popularly in a way Hart never could, because Hart’s big idea is a horrible-sounding musical. Your fortune can turn, it’s just that Hart’s wasn’t going to.

    The kid who would be Sondheim and the young director kind of fade into the background and serve their own purposes– you don’t need to know that’s little Sondheim to understand the sting Hart feels when a pretentious kid who seems to think like Hart does tells him he’s a medium talent. You can tell yourself you’re just misunderstood by all the sentimental dummies, but when a fellow snob doesn’t like your work either, that piece of your armor is gone.

    Blue Moon reminded me of Inside Llewyn Davis in a bunch of ways, and I may be more forgiving of the E.B. White stuff because it connects with the end of that movie, which I think is brilliant. Llewyn’s been to Chicago and back, he has no money, we know he’s about to get the shit kicked out of himself in an alley (Inside Llewyn Davis and Blue Moon also open similarly), and he watches Bob Dylan perform the song “Farewell,” which sounds a lot like his only ‘hit,’ “Fare Thee Well.” Dylan might as well be the storm at the end of A Serious Man. He’s going to become easily the most famous person in folk music, much less the Greenwich Village scene, he’s going to be endlessly canonized, people are going to devote their lives to interpreting his lyrics. Dave Van Ronk, Davis’ primary real-life inspiration, died in obscurity relative even to artists like Jackson Frank. In both Inside Llewyn Davis and Blue Moon, I love the contrast between the talented people we spend most of our time watching and the people they briefly encounter, who are just as talented but know how to get out of their own way, these people who are on the cusp of experiencing once in a generation success. However popular the song “Blue Moon” is, Hart thinks it’s compromised, his least interesting work, he’s still complaining in this bar that the record company wouldn’t let him stick with his original title for the work. Meanwhile, White’s going to start selling millions of books doing something he (or at least the movie version of him) finds deeply satisfying, after spending a little stretch of time in a rut.

    As corny as it is for Blue Moon’s version of White to be like “You’ve observed this mouse named Stuart who gets into adventures, you say?”, I appreciate it as something slightly more complex than Forrest Gump inspiring the happy face icon and “live laugh love” John Lennon lyrics or Star Wars movies leaning right up to my face and smirking “Hey, you ever wonder where Han Solo got his famous vest? Buckle up, buttercup.” I don’t think the White material here is the middle reader book version of a gratuitous reference.

  8. Exactly, Jules. You put it better than I did. I honestly went too easy on the fucker and I’m glad you finished the job. I am also forwarding this to him personally and I added your name to it as primary author. Thank you.

  9. I found this movie suffocating. I am not a fan of cringe comedy. I like Ethan Hawke as an actor but he’s had better roles in other movies. The dialogue was not good enough for them to be stuck in the bar all that time.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>