"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

It Chapter Two

When IT CHAPTER TWO came out six years ago I heard that it was really bad (a subjective opinion) and two hours and fifty minutes long (a verifiable measurement). The “bad” part isn’t really a dealbreaker for a courageous viewer like yours truly, but combined with the length it was intimidating. Still, I intended to see it because I’m a horror fan and a merciful soul (I didn’t even hate director Andy Muschietti’s followup THE FLASH) and I promised friends I would see it so we could talk about it. But every October since it’s sat there on my list.

This month I watched a Sophia Lillis and a Finn Wolfhard and a couple Bill Skarsgårds and I decided it was time to stop running. It was time to go back home and face IT CHAPTER TWO. I’m not proud of it but my method was to watch it in three one-hour installments like a TV show. I know that’s not the way to watch an epic and I wouldn’t normally do it, but it finally got me through. (And the filmmakers probly figured out that was the best way to do it too, because they’re just starting a prequel TV series called Welcome to Derry.)

I should mention a few other reasons this was not the ideal open-minded viewing. I haven’t read the book since I was a kid, don’t remember much specific (except that one part) and I have zero memory of all the cosmic shit that Stephen King nerds wanted to be in the movie. There are rumors of a turtle, but I cannot confirm. I also haven’t seen the mini-series since I was a kid and I haven’t seen the first IT movie since it came out in 2017. So the truth is that as I watched the adult versions of the kid characters from part 1 I didn’t really remember exactly who they were or what they did in the first one. I do remember the joke about New Kids On the Block, which has a callback here (as I sense most things people liked in chapter 1 did).

IT CHAPTER TWO opens in September, 1989 as Beverly (Lillis) tells the rest of the kids who call themselves The Losers Club about a vision she had of them as adults and Bill (Jaeden Martell, Y2K) makes them all “Swear if It isn’t dead, if It ever comes back, we’ll come back, too.” He’s assuming they will all grow up to get the fuck away from this town, and he’s mostly right.

The exception is Mike (Chosen Jacobs, SNEAKERELLA), who grows up to be played by Isaiah Mustafa (BOY KILLS WORLD). It turns out that part of the evil of It is that if you leave town you’ll forget about It. Since Mike never moves out of Derry he remembers everything and when It starts happening again it falls upon him to get the rest of the Losers Club back in town and remind them about It. Mike works as a librarian, with two side gigs: monitoring the police band for signs of killer klowns, and narrating IT CHAPTER TWO, while all the other Losers go on to high paying careers in various cities.

This being based on a Stephen King book, obviously Bill grows up to be a famous author (played by James McAvoy, THE POOL). He’s currently involved with the movie adaptation of one of his bestsellers (directed by Peter Bogdanovich!), which is already filming even though everyone agrees that Bill sucks at writing endings and the ending of the book sucks and must be changed and he has not yet written the new ending. Which seems like a terrible but also realistic way to make a movie. It reminds me of another book adaptation I saw, where the book skipped between when the characters were kids and when they were adults, and they condensed it to just be about the kids, but then they made a sequel where they did the adult part but also they knew everybody liked the kids so they also made some new scenes with the kids. Not a great basis for telling a good story, but what are you gonna do when there’s already a release date?

Richie (Wolfhard) also grows up to be famous – a comedian played by Bill Hader (POWER RANGERS). Beverly (now Jessica Chastain, THE HUNTSMAN: WINTER’S WAR) is not famous exactly but created a clothing brand they all know. Ben (Jeremy Ray Taylor, GEOSTORM / Jay Ryan, Law & Order Toronto: Criminal Intent) lost weight and started an architectural firm, Eddie (Jack Dylan Grazer, SHAZAM! / James Ransone, THE AMERICAN ASTRONAUT) is an insurance company risk analyst, and Stan (Wyatt Oleff, KARATE KID: LEGENDS / Andy Bean, MALIGNANT) co-founded a large accounting firm. No truck drivers, landscapers or house painters in this bunch.

Present day Derry is still full of wholesome-seeming-but-actually-isn’t-it-really-creepy-when-you-think-about-it small town imagery like a carnival (with lots of clowns), a night time little league game, a Paul Bunyan statue (that will turn animated and attack Wolfhard like a deleted scene from one of his GHOSTBUSTERS movies), and a “Canal Days” festival where the mascot is the same beaver costume from HUNDREDS OF BEAVERS. It all starts when a gay couple (Xavier Dolan, BAD TIMES AT THE EL ROYALE and Taylor Frey, THE HOLIDAY EXCHANGE) enjoying the carnival get harassed and attacked by a family of homophobic bullies. I’m pleasantly surprised they aren’t (as far as I can tell) related to Henry Bowers (Nicholas Hamilton, CAPTAIN FANTASTIC / Teach Grant, THE THICKET), the bully from part 1 who returns as a possessed berserker. These non-Bowerses throw one of the men off a bridge where he does not drown but floats over and gets eaten by the current #2 evil clown in cinematic horror, Pennywise (Skarsgård, WHITE WATER FURY).

It’s an evil fuckin town, and not only in ways that seem supernatural. The constant gay bashing, the fat kid getting bullied by having his belly straight up slashed, the headlines calling Mike’s parents “two crackheads” when they die in a fire. (I guess that is supernatural, because in the end the headline changes.) It’s all part of a central theme that I do find interesting: the evil of It works in conjunction with small town small-mindedness. Just before the incident, Adrian and Don were talking about moving to New York to get away from this shit. As described above, all but one of the Losers did get away from this shit, and even forgot about it! Yeah, I guess they’re all in bad relationships, especially the ones who were abused by their parents, so maybe the idea is that they have to go back and face It before they can move on with their lives. Otherwise Mike is being pretty selfish dragging them back. I guess his reason is that if they don’t stop him he’ll get more powerful and escape Derry and ruin cities also, which would be a bummer. Like DEMONS with more bigotry.

When a movie is good I don’t mind it being long. Sometimes I prefer it. I do not believe this one earns the epic length. Maybe give it 100 minutes instead of 90 so they can be leisurely about the reunion at the Chinese restaurant (“Jade of the Orient”) before they start remembering. But other than that and the complication of having so many characters in two different time periods (the flashback scenes mostly unnecessary) it’s basically just a Blumhouse-style ghost movie, a series of encounters with weird shit, some more effective than others. For me I think a series of weird encounters requires a stronger narrative backbone and a sense of momentum. This feels more like getting lost for hours. A surprising number of the events are the adults remembering a weird monster they saw when they were a kid; there’s not even a pretense of danger because we know they survived and forgot about it until now.

I did like Muschietti’s movie MAMA, which introduced his talent for ghosty imagery, often digitally enhanced. Those sorts of things are the highlights here. The scene where Beverly visits her childhood apartment and discovers photos of Pennywise when he was alive is completely ludicrous, but I like the gag where she doesn’t notice the old lady (Joan Gregson, Storm of the Century) scurrying around naked and turning into a monster behind her. And the monster reminds me of Phyllis Diller in THE BONEYARD.


There are a bunch of fun bits like that. I enjoyed Pennywise getting a big mouth like the Reapers in BLADE II, various surreal helium balloon appearances, a crying-baby-faced bug creature that crawls out of a fortune cookie, a crawling eyeball, various zombified past victims (sometimes animated, sometimes animatronic), an animated hallucination when Mike doses Bill to explain a BILLY JACK/ON DEADLY GROUND style vision quest he went on, a swarm of tiny hands grabbing out of the sewer, a really good THE THING style severed-head-with-spider-legs, a giant Pennywise with crab legs, which falls over, impales itself and pukes up fire.


There’s lots of stuff that would fit well in an EVIL DEAD. If the best of this stuff was in a quick movie with a good, simple premise I might’ve loved it.

Muschietti and cinematographer Checco Varese (PROM NIGHT, G20) seem to have fun playing around (there’s a shot from under a glass table looking through the one missing piece of a puzzle), and the digital FX are way better than in THE FLASH. This had a big budget for a horror movie, but less than half what it cost for THE FLASH, and I suspect the difference is that the studio messed with him less so he had more time to get the visuals right. Even without the computers, Skarsgård continues his reign as one of his generation’s greats, doing a crazy voice, dancing around, working well under makeup, twisting his face around. I think we could compare it to Robert Englund as Freddy (who was also aided by imaginative special effects teams), though it honestly seems like more work.

Tonally it’s of-putting – Richie, being a comedian, is almost always “on,” and there are some funny ideas like when a little boy comes up to him and says “The fun is just beginning” but turns out not to be a creepy boy, just a fan quoting his act to him. I think Hader has the dark humor and dramatic chops to make it a great scene, but they have him play it broad like a Will Ferrel movie. Seems like a waste.

I did laugh at this joke though:

I thought I had turned around on McAvoy after being impressed by him in SPLIT and SPEAK NO EVIL, but I realize now I just like him when he’s playing crazy dudes. When he’s supposed to be the relatable hero he doesn’t click for me. I found myself laughing at his crazed reactions, especially when he grabs a neighborhood kid (Luke Roessler, DEADPOOL 2) and yells in his face that he has to leave town.


This is a little boy, dude, he is not gonna take up the initiative to move. That’s not how things work. How do you write books if you don’t know the most basic shit about human living? I’m guessing you suck at more than endings. And then he spends a bunch of the movie riding around town on an antique (honestly before his time) child’s bicycle. I think we’re supposed to take him as a regular guy relatably losing his shit under evil-cosmic-spider-clown pressure, but he would need a whole lot more regular guy charisma to pull that off. Man, you’re stressing me out, Bill. I bet Peter Bogdanovich set this all up just to get rid of you. And no jury in America would ever convict him.

After all these hours of IT they just beat Pennywise by (spoiler for the movie IT CHAPTER TWO) kinda how Nancy (tentatively) beat Freddy – by not being scared of him. But in this case also just being hurtful. Mostly they yell “You’re a clown!,” but also “You’re a mimic!” Seems like that one is supposed to cut deep, somehow. The scene is pretty laughable but somewhat rescued by how cool it looks when Pennywise turns small and sad and flat and then they pull out his heart and all smoosh it together while he watches. Yeah, I guess it’s a pretty cool ending. (Then there’s ten more minutes, including the house collapsing and Bill and Beverly kissing underwater and an epilogue where, thank God, Mike gets to move.)

This is crazy but IT was such a big deal that this sequel, which I haven’t personally heard of anyone liking, made $473.1 million in theaters. That’s more than $100 million more than SINNERS, and on a lower budget. I bring that up partly as reminder #4080 that box office is kind of a silly thing to dwell on since we’re not getting a cut, but mainly as trivia because I was surprised to read that. I guess they didn’t need me to get around to seeing it after all.

This entry was posted on Monday, October 27th, 2025 at 7:18 am and is filed under Reviews, Horror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

5 Responses to “It Chapter Two”

  1. I’m baffled by how bad the two new IT movies were. They had so much money and then got two long movies to build a rich story that would use all the awesome production values and creepy imagery to build on the theme, which you made very clear, is about how small-town small-mindedness is an evil. That is so relevant in today’s America. Instead, they were like let’s just do a bunch of jump scares. The bummer is that “they” were right as they still made a ton of cash.

  2. I watched IT Chapter 2 years ago at this point. I watched it late at night, and I think I occasionally fell asleep for five minutes at a time. Usually, that just means I’m tired and isn’t a reflection of the movie, but here the film just sort of meanders, so maybe it bears some fault.

    Way back when the first film came out, the idea of splitting the novel into two parts seemed logical. But I went ahead and read the book before seeing the movie, and it became clear why that’s not the best approach. The spine of the novel is the story of these misfits finding each other in a small Maine town. Their adult counterparts are mostly there as contrast with their younger selves and to serve as a way to definitively destroy Pennywise. Without the presence of the earlier narrative, they don’t serve much of a purpose.

    If you split the narrative, you kind of destroy that tinge of nostalgia and feelings of regret that’s integral to the story. They try to get around this with new scenes of the kids, but it’s not enough.

    I also question the decision to move the story up a couple of decades. King is an uneven writer, but he is arguably one of the most important creative voices in baby boomer literature. I understand why they did this. Stranger Things was red hot at the time. But this is fundamentally a baby boomer story, and I don’t think they need to update it for gen X.

  3. Honestly, I was surprised how hated that one was. But at the same time I was surprised how beloved the first was! They both have more or less the same strengths and problems. The main problem in both movies is that Pennywise doesn’t seem scary enough. He comes across like a Tim Burton villain. Compare that to Tim Curry’s version, who is even today still nightmare fuel, even when he looks like a normal, happy clown, without the “Why hell is that kid not running away? Skarsgardwise looks like a monster all the time!?” look of the new version.

    And that 99% of the scares are of the cheap jumpy kind, isn’t helping either, even if I admit that some of them have a great buildup. But you can have a clown or a zombie looking thingy run straight at the camera only so many times before it’s not even remotely scary anymore.

    I admit to not being bothered by the runtime at all and thought that the movie just zipped by fast, although I did find it weird that it runs almost as long as the full TV miniseries. That said, even if I am mostly indifferent about this big screen version of IT, I still would watch the long announced one-movie cut, if Muschietti ever gets around to putting that one out.

  4. I rewatched the first one recently after only seeing it when it came out. I remember thinking it was a strong B+ that wiffed a few moments, that it maybe didn’t congeal all the way to being equal to the sum of its parts (and some parts were GREAT), and that it suffered a huge horror-movie problem I thought we’d all solved as a society when too many scenes feature the monster NOT killing the kids even though he totally could. It just makes him less scary and drowns the stakes.

    But watching the first part again, I bumped it down to like a C. It’s fine. It’s not great. I do think the second part is almost unwatchable, as its SO long and meanders SO much and is just laughably written. I remember the hype around it pre-release and the deflation feeling like MATRIX: RELOADED level “Wow, they really fucked it up, didn’t they?” But the first part wasn’t actually that great to begin with.

    I think this story’s just really hard to tell if you stick too close to the book. Like most Stephen King things, it’s better if the filmmakers just do their own thing with the BASIC idea. Keep the best moments and focus your movie on the stuff YOU care about, don’t try and keep it all. It never really works.

  5. Yeah, I remember enjoying the first movie, but I also didn’t understand people who were going crazy over it. The tricky thing with adapting It is that there are too many characters. Aren’t there like seven kids? That’s too many kids! They probably could have killed off a few, and it would have been unexpected and shocking, even for people who have read the book. It would have saved them money on casting the adults, so the studio would have liked it as well.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>