"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Four Brothers (20 years later revisit)

August 12, 2005

I reviewed John Singleton’s FOUR BROTHERS twenty years ago and hopefully I’ll have a few new things to say about it, but the sad truth is my verdict has not changed. This is a movie that starts off with a real good hook and then doesn’t do enough with it. It’s thoroughly okay.

SUMMER 2005The screenplay is by David Elliot (THE WATCHER) & Paul Lovett, the team who later did G.I. JOE: THE RISE OF COBRA, and the hook is that an old lady named Evelyn Mercer (Fionnula Flanagan, THE EWOK ADVENTURE) is in a convenience store in Highland Park, Michigan when it gets robbed, and ends up shot to death. It turns out she was a beloved member of the community who helped hundreds of troubled kids find foster homes. But there were four kids so bad nobody would take them, and she adopted them herself. So her funeral brings all four brothers back home, they get to talking, and decide to go find out who did this. 

Sort of the leader of the group is Bobby (Mark Wahlberg following I HEART HUCKABEES), a real hot head and primary instigator of the being-up-to-no-good. The others, as I noted in my original review, don’t really show signs of being bad kids. Angel (Tyrese Gibson, who Singleton had directed in BABY BOY and 2 FAST 2 FURIOUS) is the Luke Duke of the movie, his troublemaking is just that he steals a neighbor’s girlfriend, Sofi, who comes to live with them and they racistly call her “Mi Vida Loca.” (I guess good for Bobby being familiar with the works of Allison Anders. I wouldn’t have called that.) But at least it’s a much bigger role for Sofía Vergara than what she had in LORDS OF DOGTOWN earlier in the summer, and she’s good in it.

Jeremiah (André Benjamin, HOLLYWOOD HOMICIDE) is the responsible one who stuck around and took care of their mom, is known as an upstanding citizen, so fresh and so clean clean. Jack (Garrett Hedlund in only his third movie, two years before DEATH SENTENCE and five years before TRON: LEGACY) is the little brother who’s in a band, he has spiky hair and a leather jacket and seems okay being a pretty boy, doesn’t try too hard to be tough, though he doesn’t like how much Bobby picks on him.

There’s an interesting scene where Bobby is overwhelmed by being in his mother’s room and starts to cry, so he goes and hides in the bathroom while “I Wish It Would Rain” by The Temptations plays, with the lyrics “But everyone knows that a man ain’t supposed to cry.” He rinses his face, then goes into Jack’s room, accuses him of crying and calls him a fairy. Throughout the whole movie he targets Jack specifically with homophobic taunts – I wasn’t sure at first if he was actually supposed to be gay or if that was just Bobby’s favorite joke (it turns out to be the latter). Weirdly Bobby’s vulnerable side isn’t really explored any further, his toxic masculinity doesn’t really have an arc to it. But now that I think about it it’s pretty Singleton to throw in a little contradictory thing to make you think about a topic he doesn’t really intend to go into detail about.

By the way, I noticed they keep saying their mom got shot in a liquor store, but we saw it happen, it was a convenience store. Somebody call 911 or whatever the number is for Cinemasins. It’s a pretty straight forward mystery investigation, the boys following from lead to lead, terrorizing local criminals who might know something about what happened. They raid places pretending to be cops and basically they just act like cops, yelling and pushing, threatening to shoot, also threatening to light on fire. In fact, the actual cop Lieutenant Green (Terrence Howard), who they knew growing up and are on a man-hug-at-the-funeral basis with, doesn’t seem as bad as them.

I’m a little confused about the timeline because I really thought I saw the Singleton-produced HUSTLE & FLOW in the theater, but if so it must’ve come to Seattle late or something because I definitely didn’t see it before this movie or it would’ve seemed notable that Terrence Howard and Taraji P. Henson are both in it. (Henson plays Jeremiah’s wife.) Usually when an acclaimed director only produces and doesn’t direct it’s not gonna be as good as his real shit, but I think we all agree HUSTLE & FLOW is way better than this.

There are corrupt cops involved and a pretty clever (if far-fetched) method of comeuppance, but the scariest villain is a gangster named Victor Sweet (Chiwetel Ejiofor, who will do SERENITY, INSIDE MAN, CHILDREN OF MEN, AMERICAN GANGSTER and REDBELT all in the next three years). He does seem kinda like a Blaxploitation villain with that name and his fur coat and cane. He likes to dump bodies under the ice of a frozen lake, and owns a restaurant where everybody from criminals to politicians are terrified of him and kiss his ass. He pulls an A BETTER TOMORROW 2 move by making a guy eat food off the floor, and humiliates a councilman (Barry Shabaka Henley, FEAR OF A BLACK HAT) by making him sit at the kids’ table for Thanksgiving dinner.

I had to include this poster because of that director credit.

I remember at the time people praising the soundtrack and yeah, it’s mostly Motown songs to honor the setting so it’s good stuff – The Four Tops, The Undisputed Truth, The Miracles. But it still bothers me that they use three of Marvin Gaye’s songs from TROUBLE MAN, including on the opening and closing credits, as if they’re the theme. Great songs, but from another movie I’ve already seen and have the soundtrack for. I was right in 2005 – we needed new soundtrack music. Maybe if Singleton kept his early composer Stanley Clarke then there could’ve been some soul in the score, but by this point he was always using David Arnold (INDEPENDENCE DAY).

Arnold also did SHAFT (2000), which at least incorporated wah-wahs. Singleton was clearly referencing more Blaxploitation tropes here, but oddly he gave the lead and most of the hero shots to Wahlberg. He’s the one who struts in and has a boxing match against Sweet at the end. Maybe it was to subvert stereotypes, I don’t know.

This is a decent looking, competently made movie, but it’s neither as virtuosic or as weird as Singleton’s earlier work. I rewatched POETIC JUSTICE recently and I forgot how cinematic that thing was – some really great shots and staging that seem above and beyond for the type of movie it is. This is more kinda what you’d expect for a movie like this. The one strange touch I guess is that the brothers sometimes imagine Evelyn standing there smiling at them. Sorta like the way Michael Meyers imagines his mom (and his childhood self, and a white horse) in Rob Zombie’s HALLOWEEN II.

Oh yeah, one other oddball touch. I mentioned in my original review that it was funny when they chased a guy and he had a bunch of rope in his apartment to rappel out the window with. For some reason I did not mention that they find a hatchet and chop the rope and make him fall. I mean that is some crazy shit, but nobody acts like it’s anything unusual. If that’s just the kind of stuff the four brothers are always coming across I wish there was more of it in this movie.

 

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 26th, 2025 at 7:10 am and is filed under Reviews, Action, Crime, Mystery. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

18 Responses to “Four Brothers (20 years later revisit)”

  1. Comrade Question

    August 26th, 2025 at 8:19 am

    re “convenience store” vs “liquor store” – I think this is a state-by-state thing. I grew up in SoCal and at least by the time I was a kid, a lot of convenience stores sold booze so we never had the liquor store/convenience store divide a lot of other states do — we tended to just call them all the liquor store. Obviously more research is required, but we might not have to get Cinemasins involved.

  2. I always had a soft spot for this one, and it’s mostly down to the cast and group chemisty. I’m a sucker for that soft toxic masculinity ball busting bullshit. I’m not a particular devotee of any of the four brother actors, but they work together very well, and I also enjoy Ejiofor and Terrence Howard a lot in this. Not a great film, not a guilty pleasure, but a worthwhile hang.

  3. It’s been a long time since I saw it. A word that I use quite often on Letterboxd is “competent”, which I use to describe movies that aren’t bad, but also not outstanding. They do what they are supposed to do, nothing more, nothing less. A bit more enjoyable than “mediocre”. And If I remember it right, “competent” is a good description for this one.

  4. This is your basic null set of a movie. It cancels itself out at every turn. It’s a blaxploitation throwback starring the whitest man on earth. It’s a comedy that isn’t funny and an action movie with no action. It’s an ensemble piece with flat characters. A down-and-dirty thriller that never doesn’t feel phony. It’s watchable the way a Busch Light is drinkable: It’s so watered down you barely notice it.

  5. I somehow never saw this movie. I almost went to it on a date but I talked her into seeing an advanced screening of KISS KISS BANG BANG instead. It doesn’t sound like I missed too much.

    “It’s so watered down you barely notice it.”

    This is a great line.

  6. “Somebody call 911 or whatever the number is for Cinemasins.” *chef’s kiss*

    I have a soft spot for action movies in the snow, which means I’m pretty pro Renny Harlin. Four Brothers had so much potential and a fair amount of decent “it’s cold outside and we’re walking around trying to find bad guys” moments. It really lends a coziness that many action films are lacking. It’s not what makes Out of Sight great, but it is an element of its greatness. So this is an automatic two stars just for choosing a different setting.

    I remembered it being okay and rewatched it during COVID but because of how much things have changed in the intervening years boy oh boy did the homophobia stick out. It gets really tiresome, really fast. I’m not a big Wahlberg guy (you know, hate crimes tend to sour me on a person) and I feel like I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find out that he ad-libbed all the gay jokes.

  7. There was a time in the distant past where I actually really liked Wahlberg. I think it was after the one two punch of THREE KINGS and THE PERFECT STORM. I would get excited to see he was in a movie and he was even the main draw for some movies. Then by the time THE HAPPENING happened I had to admit I was wrong about him. No, that’s not fair to myself. I still think he had talent and potential, but kind fell into one of those traps guys do when they get too big where they stop trying and only want to either take the easy paycheck or refuse to take a role that they think will go against their image. Wait, I’m just remembering, doesn’t he say he regrets BOOGIE NIGHTS because he’s gotten religious? That might explain some of his dogshit, family friendly role choices recently. There were a couple of spikes in there where he did good, fooling me into thinking I gave up on him too soon – THE DEPARTED and THE OTHER GUYS. But now, unlike the past, when I see he’s in a movie it’s a detriment not a draw. I know I saw this one at the time, but it left no impression. But a movie where he’s playing this kind of role equals a world of no from me on a rewatch.

  8. grimgrinningchris

    August 26th, 2025 at 4:21 pm

    I remember one thing about this movie. Exactly one.
    That I watched it in full in the “cardio-theater” in my gym at the time whilst walking like 7 miles at an eleven point incline (my regular setting then) on a treadmill.
    That’s it.

  9. Comrade – Ah, I hadn’t thought about it being a regional term. Here our convenience stores do have liquor but if you say “liquor store” you mean a store that specifically sells liquor. (I know some of the east coast calls it a “package store.”)

  10. I remember watching this on DVD rental and saying to my friend as they all gather on the ice in the third act “There’d better be a Kraken under there”. That was the only way I saw the film getting in any way interesting.

  11. Here in California, we tend to call everything liquor stores. But, if I remember correctly, in Michigan they do call them convenience stores. So I think it might be both a regional thing AND a cinema sin!

  12. Probably one of the most maddening final fight sequences in movie history, where Marky Mark and Ejiofor have a fist fight on ice in the middle of the river, and the camera keeps cutting to a chainsaw that NO ONE EVER USES.

  13. I wouldn’t be doing my job as the old fart, if I didn’t mention that this is a blatant rip-off of THE SONS OF KATIE ELDER from 1965. But the Henry Hathaway western, with John Wayne and Dean Martin, isn’t THAT good, so I won’t try to convince you all to seek it out.

  14. I am pretty sure that this is actually a credited remake of KATIE ELDER. At the very least nobody involved tried to hide what it was based on during the promo tour.

  15. Detroiter here—haven’t seen this movie, but based on the photos on IMDB, we’d definitely call the place Flanagan gets got a convenience store. In Michigan you can GET liquor in a convenience store, or a supermarket, but no one’s going around doing damn fool things like calling a 7-11 or a Kroger a “liquor store.”

  16. So, this is what it’s like to be an outlier:-)

    I have this on DVD, have seen it a few times and have always enjoyed it. Strictly in the “watchable, entertained me while it played, but rarely lingered in my thoughts afterwards” category. There’s something about the easy camaraderie between the brothers and their rude, bro-dude snappy banter that I like. Because I laugh at stupid things, I never fail to chuckle at the scene where the brothers have a conversation in the bathroom while Tyrese is at the door, Garret’s having a shower and Wahlberg’s taking a shit. It points to a comfort in each others’ presence and bodies which amuses me cause I have 4 cousins who are brothers and they do this shit sometimes.

    As for Wahlberg, he’s NEVER impressed me as an actor of any depth. A strictly one note performer but has a certain street-wise swagger and is fit and limber enough to sell me as an action dude, and as long as he’s playing within strict parameters of an archetype, he’s fine. Like the hostile shit-talking cop in THE DEPARTED, the Stoic Sniper in SHOOTER, or the wide-eyed simpleton with the long schlong who lucks into the dirtiest business in the world in BOOGIE NIGHTS. Stretch him any further and you get THE HAPPENING, which makes me chuckle for entirely different reasons.

  17. You’re not alone, KayKay, this is pretty much exactly what I enjoy about this film. I’m less dialed into the broader Walhlberg-ography, but I think your assessment of his sweet spot is on target.

  18. Thanks for the company, Skani! Was getting lonely over here

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>