"I take orders from the Octoboss."

Trap

TRAP is not only that style of rap where the beat sounds like a rattlesnake, it’s also the new M. Night Shyamalan joint, or “A NEW M. NIGHT SHYAMALAN EXPERIENCE,” as the poster puts it. It’s not one of his experiences that’s based around a big surprise, so don’t worry about that, but if by chance you don’t know the premise and would enjoy a silly thriller starring Boy Sweat Dave himself, Josh Hartnett, as a dorky dad taking his daughter to a concert, I recommend going in blind.

The rest of you may have seen the trailer, which gives us the first act reveal that Mr. Hartnett is here to finally fulfill his destiny as the dark-eyed nephew of Michael Myers (H20 timeline). As far as his kid Riley (Ariel Donoghue, BLUEBACK) knows he’s just Dad, Cooper Adams, who’s kind of embarrassing but she loves him and not just because he got her really good floor tickets to see her favorite singer Lady Raven (Saleka Night Shyamalan) to reward her for good grades. What she does not know is that he’s also the infamous serial killer known as The Butcher. And when he goes to the restroom he pulls out his phone to check the live feed of the guy he has chained up in a basement (Mark Bacolcol).

Cooper has noticed that something’s up in the arena. So many cops, so many security guards, lines of them at every exit, inside and out. And he sees them approaching some other dad at his seat and leading him away. That gives him some relief, until he notices it happening again. They’re looking for somebody. And to be fair it would be pretty reasonable to be looking for him.

So Cooper ingratiates himself to a guy working the merch table (Jonathan Langdon, CROSSWORD MYSTERIES: A PUZZLE TO DIE FOR) and gets him to blab about secret information. “The FBI or whatever” found evidence that The Butcher bought tickets to the concert, and they’ve set a trap for him. They’re profiling all the men inside and not letting anyone leave. The only way out is through backstage.

That’s the set up. And we get a little bit of an evil DIE HARD, where instead of one good guy sneaking around it’s one bad guy, stealing a security badge, a walkie talkie, testing ways to escape, trying to figure out if there’s a way to get backstage. And just by the power of cinema you get wrapped up in the problem solving, as if you’re on his side. But also it’s the dark comedy of how awkwardly he has to lie to Riley and others to cover up what he’s trying do do and why he’s acting so weird. Like the part where he suggests to his daughter that it would be cool to climb into a trap door that a guest rapper rose out of.

There’s a long list of things in this movie that make no sense. Not just the ludicrousness of the whole arena-concert-where-no-one-is-allowed-to-leave concept, but little details about everything from how the merch table operates to whether or not concerts have numerous long breaks between songs to reset the stage (in my experience they do not). You just have to go with it. This is Shyamalan World, where kids can see dead people, psychological conditions can transform your physical body, and adult men can suddenly realize they’ve never been sick or had a cold. Everything is gonna be a little off.

You have to appreciate, or at least accept, that if it’s gonna make Shyamalan laugh or smile that’s a good enough reason to put it in there. A subplot about Riley having trouble with some other girls at school causes annoyances for Cooper, as the other girls are there and one of their moms (Marnie McPhail, The Edison Twins) keeps trying to talk to him about it, but mainly seems to be there to set up one really funny reaction shot. Let me give you another example. From a distance we see glimpses of the mastermind of this whole operation, the genius profiler Dr. Josephine Grant. Who is played by Hayley Mills. Star of THE PARENT TRAP. You see? It’s beautiful. I mean, she’s good casting for the role anyway but you can’t tell me that wasn’t the reason he wanted her. And I respect it.

Some people think it’s funny that Shyamalan cast his daughter as a superstar pop diva. Obviously she has a music career, but if I’m not mistaken is not filling arenas yet. She wrote all the songs, performs them with backup dancers and other theatrics, not to mention an adoring crowd, so this is a great gift from a dad. The thing is, though, I’m old. If I didn’t see the last name, I definitely would’ve assumed she was some famous pop star. She works. In fact, she seems much more believable than the actual famous musician Scott “Kid Cudi” Mescudi (X, SILENT NIGHT), wearing a long blond wig and doing a gay stereotype as her bitchy mentor/guest performer. But I did think it was funny a singer/rapper/whatever would name himself “The Thinker” and everyone would be used to it and okay calling him that. That I do buy. They do shit like that.

There was a point in TRAP when I thought it was nearing the end without having gone much beyond what we extrapolated from the trailer. For sure if I had gone in blind I would’ve been much more impressed. Luckily, there’s a whole bunch of movie left when he finds his way out of the arena. So here come two SPOILER PARAGRAPHS about that.

SPOILER PARAGRAPH #1: Up to this point it has been an anti-hero movie, no real protagonist. And I like that. But it becomes much more exciting when Shyamalan shifts into a different mode. Cooper basically figures out a way to escape by taking Lady Raven hostage, with her playing along that she’s meeting her fan Riley and bringing them to their car in her limo. Suddenly this character who has only been performing as a musician becomes the protagonist, trying to outsmart The Butcher. She takes advantage of the presence of his family to keep him under control, and makes a bunch of smart moves, causing him to lose his shit. A chess game between a diva and a killer.

SPOILER PARAGRAPH #2: And there’s another section of the movie where his wife Rachel (Alison Pill, VICE) becomes the protagonist. One of the things she does to get one over on him is such an obvious trick it’s embarrassing that he falls for it, but otherwise I like it. I’ve seen many comparisons to Hitchcock, and it does remind me of the structure of PSYCHO, the way it tricks you into becoming invested in his goal of escape, then switches you to identify with the people trying to stop him. I’m a sucker for this approach to movies or books, where there are distinct sections, like chapters, that change the perspective of main character, and I think it’s effective here.

So, I think TRAP is a fun, stupid goof. But the best part of the movie is that it’s a great role for Hartnett. I know I’m not the only one who appreciates what he’s been up to lately, but here is his most fun, layered and central role of late. Or of his career? We remember him as a late ‘90s hearthrob, something he rebelled against slightly – I’ve noted before how in H20 he purposely mussed up his hair between takes, and for THE FACULTY he went to the more extreme measure of having a ridiculous hair cut. Teen idol self sabotage. He could never shed his handsome boy aura (even when gaining weight for OPPENHEIMER), but here he has enough traces of dork to play as the PTA’s hunkiest dad. It helps that he drives a hatchback and doesn’t wear a cool guy leather jacket like, say, Tom Cruise in WAR OF THE WORLDS.

Cooper says he has two lives that “don’t touch” – the loving dad and the sadistic psycho. So the fun part is when he gets desperate to hide Psycho Cooper and starts laying Dad Cooper on a little too thick, with too big of a smile, too nice of a tone, too corny in what he says, an “act as if” approach that knows it’s easier for people to go along with a bad lie than face a horrifying truth. A comparison could be made to Terry O’Quinn in THE STEPFATHER – Hartnett’s performance is funnier, but still pretty creepy. The difference between the characters is that the Stepfather becomes an abusive asshole when things don’t go how he wants them, while Cooper is an evil bastard who at least is really nice to his daughter. (Some see an autobiographical metaphor here about being a director, but that seems kinda fucked up to me to compare him to a guy who kidnaps people, torments them and chops them up, so I won’t speculate.) That Riley hugs her dad after she knows, before the police take him, had me thinking. It’s an interesting thing to put at the end. But maybe she just had to give it up to him for helping her meet Lady Raven.

Shyamalan has made better crafted and more thoughtful movies than TRAP, for sure. But this is a movie an experience nobody else would’ve thought of, would’ve made, would’ve made quite this way, would’ve had a daughter to play the singer in. If there’s something only you can contribute to the world, and you do it, good for you! Thank you M. Night.

* * *
SPOILERY POST-SCRIPTS

1. I like that Lady Raven rescues that poor guy over her phone but then goes there and hugs him and you know he must be just realizing that he was rescued by a superstar and wondering what the fuck is going on. Maybe he even noticed it sounded like her voice before but thought “Nah…

2. At the end, especially when they tased him instead of shooting him, I was somewhat convinced it was gonna connect to the UNBREAKABLE/SPLIT/GLASS universe, but also I knew it wouldn’t be as exciting when we saw it coming. So Night made the right decision.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 6th, 2024 at 7:32 am and is filed under Reviews, Thriller. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

16 Responses to “Trap”

  1. Just yesterday I discovered that Hayley Mills has a part in this film as the woman trying to Trap Josh Hartnett, and I can’t stop laughing at it. This is truly the ultimate dad joke. But what makes it so perfect is that casting Mills as an FBI agent hunting a serial killer sounds cool all on its own.

  2. Just yesterday I discovered that Hayley Mills has a part in this film as the woman trying to Trap Josh Hartnett, and I can’t stop laughing at it. This is truly the ultimate dad joke. But what makes it so perfect is that casting Mills as an FBI agent hunting a serial killer sounds cool all on its own.

  3. I feel like everyone is in agreement (with the exception of Vern!) that the last, I dunno, third of the movie loses a lot of momentum, even if on the page it’s a novel departure. Just too much over-writing and over-explaining, maybe too much pop psychology.

    And yet, I loved that first hour so much that I kind of forgot about the weak back-end. Loved loved loved it. I’m not a video game guy, but it felt like a game of sorts, all that problem-solving Hartnett was doing to successfully evade the cops, but also ensure his daughter had a nice time at the concert. You can kind of see him scanning rooms, looking for clues, and I think the movie’s in on the joke that often something is easily reachable, easily usable, just to steal him an extra five minutes of evasion. Down to the NPC-types that are there to carefully explain a key bit of exposition in a way-too-friendly manner.

    (“Wouldn’t it be cool if we went down there?” Yes, Zaddy Hartnett, it might be kinda cool! What IS going on down there???)

    Also, yes, I do think this is awfully sweet for Shyamalan to make a movie about a doting dad, while also providing a showcase for his talented singer daughter. But a person smarter than me should interrogate that… Dad Of The Year is also a murderer? Shyamalan, what kind of “telling-on-yourself” is this??

  4. Look, I can sit and suspend my disbelief enough to sit through damned near any of the crap Shyamalan has tried to shove at us, but like…the ending of this movie really just pissed me off. I had the same thoughts about the ending-that this was going to tie into the Unbreakable-verse. But no, it just ends. Literally nothing that happened meant anything because…he’s just going to escape again, and then what? That’s wat bothered me the most-the movie just didn’t go anywhere.

    Shyamalan has to create all these situations that are super hard to suspend disbelief about because they’re SO over the top (like him suggesting to his daughter they should go under the ramp and see what’s backstage). Or the “my daughter had cancer” to get her up on stage and it works perfectly. But I looked past that stuff because they movie seemed like it was going somewhere. Shyamalan’s movie vernacular is very peculiar to him-the way he foreshadows then very shortly resolves it and moves onto the next bread crumb. Sometimes it worked, but sometimes it was just too ridiculous.

    Lady Raven playing hero was good-I didn’t expect her to be a hero, per se, but seeing her try to use his family, playing the song to stall for time, snatching his phone, etc-a few clever things.

    I wanted so badly for this movie to be good. It really had the potential to be a good thriller. As the movie progressed, I sat there thinking about how much better this movie could have been if it had been made more similarly to films like Zodiac or Nightcrawler, and less like…it was made by Shyamalan.

  5. I come out of almost every movie having enjoyed it. It’s only upon reflection that I see the bad things. When I’m fresh out, I’m focused on the good things. This one, though, I came out of it almost annoyed, I disliked it that much. And upon reflection, it’s more like I’m mad at it. It’s not that it was so far gone that I couldn’t suspend disbelief so much as what it was asking me to suspend it for was something I thought was stupid and boring. I was with it for the DIE HARD section around the arena, but I think the rest of it really lagged. Every new change I thought, are you kidding?! It’s not over yet?!

    Hartnett was the only good thing about it. The rest of the acting was so bad. Especially Lady Raven. Her singing was good. Her stage performances were good. When she was singing. Even the little bits of acting between the songs was bad and then she suddenly gets heavy lifting acting? No. I also didn’t like the talking directly to the camera stuff. I don’t know if it was too gimmicky or what. It might also be that I was sitting too close to the screen, so the abundance of close ups was too overwhelming. If it was up to me, I’d sit on the back row in the theater, but my friend likes it close, so I let her have her way. Usually it’s fine, but if there’s a ton of close up shots I have trouble “seeing” it all.

    I think this movie would’ve benefited from a Shyamalan twist. I also wondered about him being so strong, which could’ve put him in the UNBREAKABLE world. Or if we were going to find out something like he was covering for his daughter or his wife, or that they were in it with him. With it all being so vague as to what was going on with his daughter and those other girls, I thought we might find out they stopped being her friend when she got crazy and violent with them, not that they were bullying her.

  6. This movie was dopey and had so many silly contrivances and weird lapses of plot. (SPOILER but am I right that one of the cops at the end got his eyes squished out and then seemed completely forgotten by everyone else, including his boss? Not even a single ambulance showed up, much less a stretcher being carried into the house!) And as MB mentioned above, Shyamalan keeps dropping very obvious clues in the dialogue which pay off within a few scenes so you don’t even have time to half-forget them.

    That said, I knew going in that’s just his movies are they do deliver *something* unique. So yeah, I found it pretty enjoyable for what it was. Hartnett does well, and knowing Lady Raven is M Night’s daughter added something kinda sweet the whole thing. In my opinion she’s a better musical performer than actor but that’s okay since she gets to do both.

  7. It’s basically a movie-length version of that bit in the last Saw where someone asks John Kramer “Are you a life coach?” and he goes “Something like that.” Which is to say, I loved it.

  8. I haven’t seen this yet so don’t spoil it but did Detective John Trap save the day?

  9. This was great and I’ve been surprised how many people don’t like it.

    Shyamalan is doing something here in his themes similar to Perkins w/ Longlegs on parental love vs hiding parts of ourselves from our kids but I’d argue this is done even better. And Hartnett does carry a lot on his shoulders. I’m a 40 yr old dad to a 14 year old girl and I’ve been thinking about what Shyamalan is showing about himself as a father juxtaposed with being filmmaker of dark subject matter. I’d argue that him not getting how a concert works right or his dialogue sounding alien as fun and besides the point. It’s these perceived flaws and idiosyncrasies that make him fascinating as a filmmaker making genre fare that’s not IP.

  10. Am I dense or does the premise of this film make zero sense? If I’m dense and someone wants to explain the premise to me, that would be cool. (FYI, I have seen the movie. I have all the information that the movie provided.)

  11. You’re not dense, the premise is incredibly absurd and doesn’t make any sense if you subject it to even the slightest bit of interrogation. This movie takes place in a fantastical parallel universe. But if you accept that, if you don’t let it bother you, it can be pretty entertaining.

  12. I was rather pleased with myself that I managed to catch this a few weeks into its UK run, which started a week after its US release, not knowing the twist. Turns out that [SPOILERS] there kind of isn’t one. Oh well, I enjoyed it anyway, but it definitely could have done with that extra touch to kick it up a notch.

  13. ” This movie takes place in a fantastical parallel universe. But if you accept that, if you don’t let it bother you, it can be pretty entertaining.”

    Should be the tagline for every QT flick. Not to mention all 4 John Wicks.

    Still a head scratcher for me how it’s Shyamalan that gets an extra glob of “hawk tuah” bile spat at him for doing the same thing.

    Don’t get me wrong….I understand if you don’t like his movies, like some people don’t like Wes Anderson movies. Am merely curious that the man’s been drawn and quartered for shit that his contemporaries are equally guilty of.

    Yup, I get that he peaked early with 2 bona fide classics, then got arrogant (because never before in the history of cinema has a successful artist succumbed to hubris), which meant his actually passable efforts (VILLAGE, LADY IN THE WATER) got tagged as mediocre and mediocre efforts like THE HAPPENING were reviled as crimes against cinema. Then he committed the apparently unforgivable auteur sin by taking on gigs for hire.

    So, count me as one of those who’s happy at his gradual climb back into relevance, he self-finances most of his movies meaning he can do shit he wants. I loved SPLIT & GLASS but can also acknowledge that THE VISIT, OLD & A KNOCK AT THE CABIN were watchable but spotty.

    And TRAP joins that list. A serviceable suspense thriller with a knockout performance by Hartnett. Shyamalan puts the movie on slow boil and gradually turns up the heat and the last 30 mins had me on edge. So, it did it’s job as far as I’m concerned.

    But yeah, even a Shyamalan fan like me gets pissed when the writing descends to stupid contrivances like…..

    SPOILER

    SPOILER

    I SAID SPOILER, DAMN YOU!!!

    …No freaking chance in hell is the FBI/SWAT team going to let a multiple murderer in custody hug his kid or pick up his son’s bike…or even if they do, then NOT pat him down for hidden weapons

  14. I find it very difficult to engage with films that take place in an unrecognizable world and/or contain characters that aren’t recognizable beings. I can conceive of being unbothered by this, but I think I’d need to be informed of the fantastical-parallel-universe setting straightaway so I wasn’t spending so much time or energy searching for an access point into the film’s reality. Like maybe there could be a chyron right at the beginning that says “Philadelphia, PA. Planet Uberk. Alternate Dimension J-153-f-7.” Or maybe Hartnett could have a voiceover monologue explaining that cops in his reality have iron-clad lie detection technology which, because of recent legislation, all citizens are subject to upon request. And then the twist could be that actually Hartnett is a high-ranking member of a resistance movement and all his victims are thought-policing fascists.

  15. Have not seen this one — will eventually, as it looks more intriguing to me personally than his last few — but I think Shyamalan gets a bit of extra guff because of the particular mix of his particular brand of self-consciously twisty and/or puzzleboxy storytelling gimmickry with solemn self-serious tones that tend toward the unintentionally comical, along with the fact that his stories are often (not always!) seem to be intentionally set in worlds that pride themselves on a certain kind of verismilitude (e.g., THE VILLAGE, UNBREAKABLE, SPLIT), even as they have to introduce some pretty bizarre convolutions of logic or disbelief-suspension to make said twists or puzzleboxes (sort of) “work.”

    That is a long way of saying that I think QT is simply more nuanced and subtlely effective in making his particular heightened worlds or oddball choices feel internally consistent, smooth, and compelling — that is, in earning your suspension of disbelief and general buy-in with regard to his oddball worlds, characters, mannered dialgoue styles, and various plot swerves and bouts of magical realism. He does this with a level of verve, clear but subtle intentionally, and general effectiveness in a way that let’s you know he’s in on the joke and is doing a bit. It’s not often as clear that Shyamalan is in on the joke or is doing these things intentionally — or in any even with as much as skill. For example, Shyamalan’s stilted and/or clunky dialogue (e.g., THE VILLAGE, LADY IN THE WATER) often just seems like a person who doesn’t understand how people converse or at least how to make people converse the way people actually converse. And sometimes, based on how he presents it, it seems like Shyamalan thinks a given plot point is genius when it seems pretty dumb (sometimes fun dumb!). Or sometimes, with the less plausible aspects of Shyamalan’s worldbuilding / puzzle-boxing or the events he stages (like the televised reveal of superheroes in GLASS and many other aspects of GLASS), it’s not clear if Shyamalan realizes how silly or implausible some of these things. It generally feels like QT is self-consciously doing a bit to exercise his and his audience’s imagination and play with the form and its boundaries, and that he’s doing it well. Whereas, with Shyamalan, it seems like he’s pretty good at building suspense and doing puzzle box setup, but less good at internal consistent, general plausibility / verisimilitude (rigorous and airtight coherence in his narrative, especially the mystery/twist and associated worldbuilding), and dialogue.

    If this makes me sound like a Shyamalan hater — I’m not! I recently rewatched SIXTH SENSE and UNBREAKABLE, and both hold up as cracking good yarns. I always like the VILLAGE — I’m not sure how it’s fared over time, but, at the time of its release, it was derided and laughed at as his first big miss. I also really like THE VISIT, which seems to rank as mid or kind of silly for a lot of people. Really like SPLIT, as well. SIGNS is solid, if a little maudlin (and the water thing is kind of dumb). I thought GLASS was a travesty, OLD was pretty dumb, and I didn’t see KNOCK AT THE CABIN. I kind of liked the first season of WAYWARD PINES.

  16. I thought the movie was awesome and also I found out that me and Ariel Donoghue have the same birthday *meaning we were born on the same day*

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>