"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

The Package (1989)

THE PACKAGE is… kind of an action movie from director Andrew Davis. After the better-than-average Chuck Norris vehicle CODE OF SILENCE (1985) and Steven Seagal’s debut ABOVE THE LAW (1988) the director put some similar elements into a thriller with Gene Hackman in the lead. Hackman had just done MISSISSIPPI BURNING (which he got Oscar and Golden Globe nominations for) but did not have any black belts in anything, so I’m not sure why he thought he should be in movies?

He plays U.S. Army Master Sergeant Johnny Gallagher, who I assume is respected for his skills, but he seems mostly just beloved for being a great guy. He’s introduced arriving for security detail at the site of U.S.-Soviet Union disarmament talks in West Berlin and walking around smiling and saying hi to everybody.

He and his squad, which includes the great Harry Lennix (of TITUS and the Funk Blast movie ride that used to be at the Experience Music Project here in Seattle), are assigned to patrol the woods, where they stop a backpacker couple but are told to hand them over to the German police who arrive on the scene. Unfortunately the cops are fake and release the backpackers to launch an attack (involving a pretty spectacular exploding/crashing car) and Johnny gets blamed. One thing I like about this scene is that they don’t play the backpackers as ominous in any way when they first appear. I fell for them really being some clueless locals who didn’t deserve to have guns pointed in their faces.

As sort of a punishment Johnny’s next assignment is to transport a prisoner introduced to him as Walter Henke (Tommy Lee Jones, right before FIRE BIRDS – Henry Silva must not have been available) back to the States for court martial. The prisoner seems to be a real rascal, in for playfully punching out superior officers, and he enjoys teasing Johnny about being too by-the-books. I like when he makes a little speech about his dad getting screwed over despite a life long love of America and Johnny asks, “What’d you do, read a book, Walter?” Seems like this is gonna be a fun MIDNIGHT RUN or GUNMEN type of back-and-forth deal, but when he escapes it quickly becomes clear that “Walter” (who is actually named Thomas Boyette) is very dangerous and seems to be involved in a complex assassination conspiracy intended to stop the treaty with the Soviets.

Meanwhile there’s a real Walter Henke (Kevin Crowley, MAJOR LEAGUE, DONNYBROOK) who has been put undercover with a white supremacist group. That’s how they’re described to him, and they have a big sign with Abraham Lincoln’s face crossed out, but they seem mostly concerned with hating communists and loving nuclear weapons. They’re definitely against a treaty.

In his quest to find his fugitive, Johnny goes to his ex-wife, J.A.G. Lieutenant Colonel Eileen Gallagher (Joanna Cassidy right after WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT) for help. This is a really unique element of the movie, because they’re divorced and in no danger of getting back together, but they’re happy to see each other, they like to joke around, and they refer to themselves as being friends. She tells him “You’re still a pain in the ass, Johnny Gallagher,” but in a way that means she’s still charmed by him. And she kept his last name, didn’t she?

It’s not only that relationship, but the novelty of Hackman playing a pretty likable guy that brings a surprising pleasantness to this still tense thriller. I like that Hackman is funny in it. My favorite part is when he infiltrates the white power group by brazenly walking in pretending to be bringing them a delivery. Everybody turns to glare at this intruder and he acts oblivious. He looks a guy in the eye and says “How you doin? Great day to be an American, in’t it?” Even without the second line it would get a laugh from me. He just pulls off the personality of a guy who would say “How you doin?” to somebody that’s considering shooting him. This is kind of an Axel Foley move!

Eileen learns how serious the matter is after she has her friend and colleague, Army 1st Lieutenant Ruth Butler (motherfuckin Pam Grier), look into it. Sadly, Grier (who was a legitimate co-lead in ABOVE THE LAW) is, let’s say, not in the movie enough.

Of course with Hackman in the lead it feels very different from a Seagal film. But it’s similar in that he’s playing the seasoned, respected soldier with old friends all over the place who discovers corruption within the military, tries to fight it, gets set up. And he’s got the opponent who has a similar military background but got disillusioned and turned bad. And, like ABOVE THE LAW, it ends with a news report telling us about the hero testifying in DC to expose the corruption.

Hackman couldn’t physically fight like Seagal, so his big action scene is just driving recklessly through traffic when he figures out where and when the assassination will take place. He has such bad luck that he hits both a bridge going up (but is able to jump it before it gets up very high) and a passing train. And his car gets more torn apart than is traditional in this sort of scene. I enjoyed that. The stunt coordinator is Terry J. Leonard (APOCALYPSE NOW, CONAN THE BARBARIAN, RED DAWN, COBRA; director of DEATH BEFORE DISHONOR starring Fred Dryer).

Davis and/or Leonard put in a few little details that I like. In a scene where Eileen is chased on foot through a parking garage there’s a rack of hanging bicycles that she runs behind and her pursuer knocks around like the hangers Michael Myers knocks around in the closet – that’s a sight I’ve never seen. And she goes around a corner where we see some cleaning products and then the guy chasing her comes around and falls on his ass. No need to show us the slippery floor itself. We get it.

They also get help from Chicago Police Lieutenant Milan Delich (Dennis Franz, who had been in Davis’s 1978 film STONY ISLAND). They go to meet one of his informants in a diner and it’s a set up where not only patrons but one of the cooks starts shooting at them. And there are less violent scenes that are full of tension, like when they try to catch up with Henke and have to try to push their way through a crowded peace demonstration because he’s with “nazi goon” counter-protesters.

In an introduction on the DVD and Blu-Ray, Davis says that the original script took place at Camp David, but he had it rewritten to take place all across Chicago, his home town and setting for almost all of his movies up to that point (the exception being THE FINAL TERROR, filmed in some woods in California). The script is credited to John Bishop, a playwright and script doctor whose other feature film credit is for DROP ZONE (1994).

Davis’s next film was UNDER SIEGE (1992), which is of course a Seagal film, and more directly action-oriented than this one. But I also see UNDER SIEGE as emblematic of the differences between ’80s and ’90s action movies. In Seagalogy I marked it as the transition from Golden Era Seagal (ABOVE THE LAW, HARD TO KILL, MARKED FOR DEATH, OUT FOR JUSTICE) and Silver Era, which had bigger budgets and more emphasis on action with exploding vehicles, missiles and machine guns. THE PACKAGE and UNDER SIEGE have more in common than just Jones having fun playing a villain. Both point their cameras in awe at the might and power of the United States government. The latter has its military hardware, its war room of high ranking military officers, its dress uniform ceremonies, its presidential visit. The former has multiple meetings and ceremonies with the leaders of the United States and the Soviet Union, and their enormous political and military entourages. I see THE PACKAGE as a precursor to movies like PATRIOT GAMES, CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER, IN THE LINE OF FIRE, AIR FORCE ONE, and EXECUTIVE DECISION. (The Harrison Ford genre.) According to his obituary in the L.A. Times, Bishop did uncredited rewrites on CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER, so there’s a direct connection there.

And of course the subject matter itself is, like the previous year’s RED HEAT and IRON EAGLE II, a sign that we’re moving on from worrying about invasion U.S.A.s and red dawns and moving toward trying to make peace. On December 2nd and 3rd, Bush and Gorbachev (who are never named in the movie, but the actors playing the leaders somewhat resemble them) had a real life summit in Malta that was considered by some to be the official end of the Cold War. Who knows if it ever could’ve gone down without that ol’ pain in the ass Johnny Gallagher?

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 23rd, 2019 at 11:42 am and is filed under Action, Reviews, Thriller. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

19 Responses to “The Package (1989)”

  1. YES! I love this movie, not even totally sure why. There isn’t a ton of action, as Vern points out, and what action there is isn’t super compelling. But the Cold War intrigue is fun, Hackman and Tommy Lee Jones are great. So happy you finally did this one.

  2. Hey Vern – one other quick typo note, you accidentally refer to Pam Grier as Milan Delich (obviously Franz’s character), her name is Lt Ruth Butler.

  3. Whoops! Thanks Bob.

  4. I also love this movie. I was a nerdy kid who was into Premiere magazine and those giant video guide books that told you who was in movies as well as who directed them. I knew Andrew Davis made Above The Law, so I was excited to see this from the get go. (Plus it had silenced pistols which I thought were amazing at the time)

    I remember being pleased when Pam Grier and half the Chicago cops from Above the Law showed up, but I also remember really liking this one. Saw it twice, even!

    Thanks for reviewing this one and making me remember how much i like it!

  5. Interesting! I see where you’re coming from with the Harrison Ford genre movies but I don’t think I ever made that connection before. This seems much more questioning of the military and its role than any of those Tom Clancy stories ever are.

    Anyway, put me down on team THE PACKAGE. I love this one and have been looking forward to this review both for itself and as a sidenote on Seagalology. It’s beautifully cast all the way down – even if Pam Grier doesn’t have enough to do – and Davis always makes Chicago seem both real and interesting. Hackman is great with Jones and with Cassidy, the plot is fun, and the screenplay doesn’t force things. In fact, it had not occurred to me until now that the action is fairly low key, as so many of the scenes are tense and the whole thing builds beautifully.

    It’s a common complaint that movie stars often ruin things by wanting their characters to be likeable, so it seems strange to regret how rarely Hackman didn’t just play a hard ass.

  6. In case anyone noticed, yes, I accidentally posted another review and then took it down. It will return tomorrow.

  7. Retired or not, Gene Hackman is America’s greatest living actor. I have *never* seen him give a bad performance, and when he tiptoes right up to the line between funny and scary (PRIME CUT, NIGHT MOVES, MISSISSIPPI BURNING, UNFORGIVEN, even ROYAL TENENBAUMS) he’s amazing. I will definitely check this movie out.

  8. Been recommending this one to you for years and yeah, it’s not an action movie, but it is just a well done thriller that repurposes a standard plot with deft Davis touches. It’s also a great Hackman twofer with NO WAY OUT.

    You get John Heard doing his great smug and weaselly turn. Hackman, Cassidy and Franz have great chemistry. Even little touches like Cassidy extracting Franz’s family show the attention to detail as the story sprawls across the city.

    Along those lines burningambulance you’ve got EXTREME MEASURES which also has a reliable David Morse turn.

  9. It kinda cracks me up to think that without this (and UNDER SIEGE, of course), Tommy Lee Jones prolly wouldn’t have won the Oscar for THE FUGITIVE, also directed by Andrew Davis.

    And as far as funny/scary performances by Hackman go, I’d like to shine a light on Raimi’s THE QUICK AND THE DEAD. I love that movie dearly, and Hackman’s supremely confident despot Herod is legit terrifying, but has his moments of levity. I love his delivery of “Do you have a particular problem with me?” to Sharon Stone’s character.

  10. I think it’s the sense of comradery that’s Davis’ strongest side. We seem to always like the good guy teams in his movies. Politically I don’t see the connection to the Ford genre. Davis always manages to be kind of objective when it comes to politics in his movies. They certainly don’t piss off us European lefties like the Clancy ones do.

  11. I once stumbled upon this one on TV as a youngster. It played to me like my dream of what a thriller could be: a movie in which the protagonist gets the mission done without too much hassle. I need more of these!

  12. I was wondering why I hadn’t of this movie. Its German title is (translated) THE KILLER BRIGADE. That rings a bell. Still haven’t seen it.

  13. I remember this showing up all the time on tv in the ’90s. Always Saturday around 9:30. I have watched it a few times, but it’s been so long (perhaps 20 years).

  14. Hackman was on a roll in the late 80s and early 90s with one really good action movie a year. Interesting take on the Lee Harvey Oswald conspiracy in this one.

  15. I don’t know how I ever missed this growing up. I was pretty well versed in the works of both Davis and Lex Luthor himself around this time. Like I had even seen THE FRENCH CONNECTION by that point and I was only pushing 6. To think there is something they actually did together and that also includes muthafucking Tommy Lee Jones has just blown my mind. This is one of those movies Netlfix SHOULD have available but probably doesn’t.

  16. No. 2 son is here locked down with us and claiming he’d never seen THE FUGITIVE. So we watched it last night. I’d holds up really well. It really is an action movie with a steady drip of great set pieces, and older and trying to be wiser now, I can see that Tommy Lee Jones doesn’t actually steal the movie out from under Harrison Ford. In fact Ford gives one of his finest performances; it’s just not showy. And hell, he must’ve been cold in that river.

    But it’s Davis’s filmatism – not just in the set pieces – that makes it great. However over the top things go, you always feel like these are real people in real places acting rationally.

    I’m pretty much halfway through my Justified lockdown binge, so an incidental pleasure was seeing a young Nick Searcy turn up as an asshole sheriff giving the US Marshals a hard time.

    It’s just a shame the drug trial thing at the centre of THE FUGITIVE is such utter nonsense.

  17. Justified is easily my favorite show ever. So many great characters, such great writing. I even got my dad to watch them (took a month because he’s cranky fuck and doesn’t want anything new) then he shocked me by telling me he watched them all in 5-6 days. He just mainlined them, and then he watched them AGAIN right after.

  18. Respect to your dad, Muh. I am approaching the end of series 4 and that’s after about 6 weeks, although to be fair to me, I was not convinced by season 1. Gotta agree with you now though. Season 2 and the Bennetts fixed that, and to be honest seasons 3 and 4 step up from there.

  19. Yeah first is good but picks up when the main storyline starts…then 2 is so great. Loved 3 and 4. 5 is where I was like uh oh, did they hit the wall? It’s good but not quite there. But then I think 6 was right up there with 2. I’d rank em 2, 6, 4, 3 (those two are almost interchangeable) 1 and then 5.

    Season 1 always sneaks on me…cause that’s the one with the most disconnected stores so sometimes I’m like “I just want to watch a Raylan Givens story” so the first season is perfect for that…they’re like little movies. But then it’s so good I want to watch more of them, and I’m like I got shit to do I can’t watch six seasons again! I’ve watched them more than once.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>