"KEEP BUSTIN'."

The Shallows

With the inauguration about to happen I think alot of us kinda feel like we’re all alone, torn open, bleeding and floating on a dead whale, unable to get to shore because a shark the size of a fuckin bus wants to eat us and will not leave us be. So I thought you know what, what if there was a movie about somebody else in that situation, maybe if it had a positive outcome it would be a good inspirational tool for all of us as citizens of the United States and the world who hope to somehow survive the coming shit show of dangerous ignorance and blatant, barely-even-trying-to-fuckin-hide-it-at-all corruption.

The title THE SHALLOWS is not about the new management, it’s just referring to an area of not-that-deep water that is the setting for a pleasingly simple 80-minute romp from Jaume Collet-Serra, director of HOUSE OF WAX, GOAL II, ORPHAN and three Liam Neeson vehicles (UNKNOWN, NON-STOP and RUN ALL NIGHT). Liam must’ve been busy doing SILENCE or something, so Collet-Serra went off and made this adaptation of Blake Lively’s one woman off Broadway show about a surfer trapped on a rock after a shark attack.

I lied. It is not based on a one woman show. But it is almost entirely balanced on Lively’s shoulders. She plays Nancy, who is always on screen and usually alone. Supporting characters who she’d also play in the stage version are:

1. Little boy seen on beach in prologue

2. Guy who gives her ride to beach

3. Her friend who was supposed to be with her, portrayed through text messages

4-5. Her father and younger sister, seen on her phone

6-7. Two surfers she meets who leave the beach before she gets bit

8. The shark. A real asshole.

9. An injured bird she names Steven Seagull (!)

10. A drunk guy she sees on the beach at one point

The parameters are set up very carefully: her phone is left on the beach in her bag. It’s a secret surf spot without many people living nearby. She almost graduated medical school. Her friend won’t know to be looking for her and doesn’t know where the beach is anyway. There is some painful stinging coral in the area. There’s a dead whale. There’s a buoy. She has a watch.

So it’s a test of her survival skills, her toughness and ingenuity. She uses her jewelry and clothing to hold her bitten leg together. To be able to handle it she talks out loud to herself as if talking to a patient. “There you go. Good. That wasn’t so bad, was it?” type shit. She floats on the whale (not pleasant), lays on the rock, climbs onto the buoy. She follows the tides. She times the shark circling to figure out if she can make it to another spot.

You know, the rock is small, but she shouldn’t out of hand dismiss the idea of starting a new life there. She came here for adventure, didn’t she? Maybe this is the new start she’s looking for. Just a suggestion.

Collet-Serra continues the very 2010s gimmick he started with NON-STOP of showing text messages floating on screen next to the phones that make them. But since she leaves her phone behind then we start just seeing the information she can get from her watch.

It’s mainly shot in a hi-def documentary-ish style, and it looks like Lively does her own surfing. This realism clashes slightly with the digital business required for some of the big moments, but I think those sequences are really well executed, with Lively seemingly doing some kind of underwater stunts, and cool camera moves dipping into the water and back to the surface, or through a swarm of glowing jellyfish or things like that. The shark is huge (JAWS sized) and usually looks very real.

Lively (SAVAGES, GREEN LANTERN, THE TOWN) is perfectly cast. She’s pretty in a more human, less Hollywood way, with freckles and a very slight hippie vibe. I absolutely believe her as a young woman with the will and desire to end up surfing alone in South America for adventure and emotional closure. And I also believe her having some bad, not terrible tattoos, and jewelry that can be used for makeshift surgical purposes.

Seagull has a supporting role. Not like EXECUTIVE DECISION. He lasts longer. Maybe it’s a similar amount of action, but he’s more passive. She resets a bone in his wing, which I guess in action star terms is like the scene where the hero lays shirtless while the female love interest pulls a bullet out (and clanks it in a metal receptacle of some kind). It would be cool if she poured whisky on Steven Seagull as an anesthetic. Anyway, healing in action movies is usually kind of a submissive role for the woman when self-surgery is not an option. I like that Lively gets to heal and do all the action. It’s an example of how women in action can get away with layers that men aren’t typically allowed when they’re trying to be tough.

Then again, it could be an homage to OUT OF REACH, in which Seagal also helps an injured bird.

Screenwriter Anthony Jaswinski wrote BACKWOODS and VANISHING ON 7TH STREET. I saw the latter, because it’s directed by Brad Anderson, but I didn’t find it exciting enough to even write a review of. This turned out much better, finding inobstrusive ways to get an emotional character arc into a short, limited location, mostly-one-character thrill ride.

So… look lively, everyone. If Blake can get out of that mess then maybe, just maybe, we can get out of ours. Although we will still have been chomped by a giant shark. I wish we never went on this fucking trip.

This entry was posted on Thursday, January 19th, 2017 at 11:14 am and is filed under Reviews, Thriller. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

14 Responses to “The Shallows”

  1. I liked this one, but I thought the other killer shark movie that was supposed to come out around the same time “In the Deep” (aka “47 Meters Down”) was better. This felt a bit too glossy and went too over the top at the end to maintain the suspense/terror.

  2. Really enjoyed this one. I actually liked how over-the-top it got. At least for me, it gave a real ‘how is she going to best this shark who obviously has human intelligence and is clearly a slasher movie killer?’ One of those ones that doesn’t want to reinvent wheel, just tell it’s story solidly.

  3. I guess to be clear, I felt “In the Deep” was more frightening. SPOILERS The scene where they have to slowly ascend and stop every so many meters to decompress with only some underwater flares to keep a school of sharks away from them was genuinely terrifying.

  4. That sounds great! I’ll give it rent, this weekend maybe.

  5. My favorite part of this film is the fact that they even gave the fucking shark some motivation.

  6. I love sharks. Surfed with them as a kid, got one tattooed on my back, dress my eldest daughter up as one for Halloween, she even has a Bruce toy that she sleeps with sometimes. Just once I would love to see a hero shark movie. They’re not as bad as movies would have you believe!

  7. I’m actually more scared of whales than of sharks. Don’t know why. I think it’s their size and the freaky noises they make. Also you can get rid of a shark by punching him in the nose or poke his eye. Try dat shit with a whale!

  8. CJ- You just put a cork on that blowhole and watch the whale mplode

  9. I’ve had some up close experiences with Orca and they are way scarier than sharks. I’m cool with other whales though.
    Also, I liked this movie. Super entertaining and not as exploitative of Lively being in a bikini for much of the running time as I feared it would be. She’s really great in this.

  10. Noted. From now on I won’t even go near the ocean without corks of different sizes.

    Remember when everybody was wondering what the CLOVERFIELD monster would look like? One of the things that floated around the web as supposed concept art, was basically a drawing of a humpback whale on legs and it scared the shit out of me.

  11. I had fun with this movie, but I am a sucker for any shark movies. The shark, I thought, was very well done in this. When the inevitable Jaws reboot comes out, I actually have hope that they can CGI it as opposed to mechanical shark it.

    Now this being said, this has to be the dumbest movie I have seen in ages. Quite honestly, I realized I had to put my brain on hold when the movie starts with Blake Lively hitchhiking through Mexico and not getting sexually assaulted. Talking with her friend, the seagull, lighting the water on fire, stitching herself up, etc. It is such a ridiculous flick. But I enjoyed it, and will probably watch it when it starts popping up on HBO.

  12. CJ – Whales are terrifying! It’s their sheer size and that they’re frickin’ prehistoric. It would be like interacting with a dinosaur. It’s not like I’m afraid they’d intentionally hurt me, but I’m a bug to them and could be easily squashed, or in this case, flung halfway across, or under, the ocean without them even knowing I was there.

  13. This was a pretty lively (no pun intended) though somewhat disposable shark attack feature. Cinematography was great at capturing the isolation of the small beach-head where the action took place. The beach was small and contained, natures amphitheater of beauty and horror. As Vern similarly suggested this could have been something like JAWS: THE REVENGE: THE MUSICAL. I would pay to see that. Blake would be the granddaughter of the nude swimmer who got jawed in half, and seeks revenge on Bruce while getting closure with the Grandma she never knew.

    Disagree with George’s sentiment that we as an audience were better off with less exploitation of Ms Lively. That lightly freckled face, those finely sculpted thighs…fuck you Ryan Reynolds I hope you choke on them.

    Since this was shot mostly on the east-coast of Australia, it made me wonder why they bothered with the Mexico locale in the story. Lord Howe Island where it was shot is the least of the most beautiful and exotic beaches we have. Although most of our north-east and north-west coastal lines are just human buffets for killer sharks and crocodiles. So stay away from those.

  14. Not much to add. This was a lean, well-crafted, minimalist woman-against-shark film. Subdued, sparse on dialogue, taut, doesn’t overstay it’s welcome, satisfying resolution. Well worth a Redbox, etc.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>