"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Jackie Brown

There are a bunch of fun movies based on Elmore Leonard books – I always like seeing what bits of his style can translate properly – but there are two absolutely great ones that are among my very favorite movies. One is Steven Soderbergh’s OUT OF SIGHT, which I got up the courage to write about for its 20th anniversary in 2018, and I bet you could guess what the other one is. Quentin Tarantino’s JACKIE BROWN has been at the top of my not reviewed list* for I don’t know how many years. It’s intimidating, you know, to try to write something worthy of a movie this good that I’ve put off for that long. But recently I took a vacation to L.A. and I was able to see a midnight show of JACKIE BROWN at the New Beverly (the historic theater owned by Tarantino since 2007), so it’s time to finally do this.

Rarely has there been a more synergistic match of adapted and adapter. The small time criminals who love to talk about other stuff, the funny loser made more dangerous by his stupidity, the protagonists who aren’t following the law either but who are our guys, the very specific regional details – all these things make perfect sense for both a Leonard book and a Tarantino movie. So this becomes both an extra-Leonardy Tarantino and a Tarantino-fied Leonard. An unstoppable combination.

The writer/director’s most inspired elaboration on Leonard’s Rum Punch was turning blonde flight attendant/smuggler Jackie Burke into a new iconic character for circa 1997 Pam Grier. Since she was two decades after her peak fame, still beloved (and popping up in stuff like ABOVE THE LAW and ESCAPE FROM L.A.) but not exactly treated by the industry as the royalty we knew she was, playing the underestimated Jackie seemed appropriate. The character is 44 years old, “waitin on people almost twenty years,” limited in the jobs she can get because of her record, no prospects for advancement or retirement, so she does some illegal deliveries on the side. She deserves a good life that working within the system will never give her.

But when she gets cornered by LAPD Detective Mark Dargus (Michael Bowen, IRON EAGLE) and ATF agent Ray Nicolet (Michael Keaton, MR. MOM) her true Foxy-Brown-ness comes out, as she outmaneuvers both law enforcement and her dangerous employer Ordell Robbie (Samuel L. Jackson, THE RETURN OF SUPERFLY) to come out with a life-changing score. Boo-yaa! Tarantino backing her moves with pieces of Roy Ayers’ all-timer score for COFFY, the song Grier sings in THE BIG DOLL HOUSE, “Cissy Strut” by the Meters and other vintage soul grooves underlines Jackie’s Blaxploitation heroine attitude, but this is not a throwback. It’s very much 1997, very particular Southern California energy, with a climax set at Torrance’s Del Amo Fashion Center mall back when you could still buy music on cassette, see THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT on film** and smoke in the food court. Robbie’s empire reaches to a small apartment in Compton, but seems headquartered in Hermosa Beach, where his unspecified relation (he’d probly say bitch) Melanie (Bridget Fonda, LITTLE BUDDHA) smokes weed, fucks his friends, and sometimes reluctantly answers the phone.

Louis (Robert De Niro between COP LAND and WAG THE DOG) and Melanie are kind of a side story, two great actors of differing industry status but both putting in some of their very best work as this deadbeat odd couple. Fonda is so funny; just the way she sits sideways in a chair shows what Melanie wants out of whatever her situation is with Ordell: a life of leisure, sun and weed, barely having to work or be responsible, always wearing what the script calls “her Melanie-uniform of stringy Levis cutoffs and a stringy bra top.” She really is a bitch, but I say that supportively because she’s right, and these guys don’t deserve to be treated nicely.

I can’t quite remember how shocking it was the first time around to see her sarcasm finally light Louis’ fuse (or if I’d read the book already) but on subsequent viewings it’s such a wrenching slow burn, DeNiro so perfectly low energy as Louis, passively going along with Ordell’s shit (including casually showing him a body in his trunk and pretending it’s not a threat) and Melanie’s advances, not seeming to have an opinion on much, but when it comes to his part of the operation and her humiliating him about his incompetence you see the anger rising and exploding into the hardest gut punch in the movie.

A character who I think made less of a mark on pop culture than your average Tarantino creation, but that has always loomed large in my brain, is the aforementioned body, Beaumont. I always had friends who hated Chris Tucker because they thought he was the annoying guy in THE FIFTH ELEMENT. Well, I like that character (super green) but Tucker’s parts in FRIDAY and especially MONEY TALKS (a film by Brett Ratner – yeah, I know) made me a fan for life. Those were for me some of the biggest laughs of that period, and here he is so incredible in a small but crucial part where he does get to be funny a bit but it mostly leans on the power of his acting as it sinks in how much trouble he’s in with Ordell. He tries to wriggle his way out, faces the fact that he can’t, hopes it will turn out okay… but it doesn’t. The rapport he has with Ordell when he’s just thanking him for getting him out of jail, then the extreme discomfort when he’s being asked to get inside a trunk to supposedly ambush some guys in Koreatown, knowing he absolutely should not fucking do this but also knowing that Ordell will not let him say no…

The Beaumont scene works as its own little chapter or short story, and I’d still want it in the movie if it was an irrelevant tangent, but it’s important because 1) Beaumont seems to be the person who ratted out Jackie and caused her whole situation, and 2) his death serves as a warning to Jackie about how Ordell will treat her now that she’s been questioned by cops.

It’s easy to take the greatness of Samuel L. Jackson (especially in Tarantino films) for granted, so much so that I almost forgot to give him a paragraph here. That would be an oversight because this is, I think, one of his best roles ever. Ordell has the usual SLJ humor, charm and swagger, but they barely mask a cold-hearted monster, a misogynist and a ruthless criminal who pretends to be your best friend almost to taunt you because he knows you probly know he has zero sense of loyalty. When he meets with bail bondsman Max Cherry (Robert Forster, ALLIGATOR) it’s clear that the guy sees right through him but he puts on the innocent nice guy act anyway, as if daring Max to call him on it.

In classic Leonard fashion Ordell is also introduced seeming like a goofball, showing off his video of women in bikinis firing machine guns and (like Melanie) enjoying being some kind of living room beach bum. As much power as he has as an arms dealer, he’s really kind of a loser. Looking good in powder blue doesn’t stop him from being pathetic as he lords over goons like Louis and Beaumont, not to mention this stable of weirdo sort-of-girlfriends in different parts of town who for all we know may have as little respect for him as Melanie does.

But this phoniness and need to maintain his bigshot image make him all the more dangerous. And there’s a visual trick Tarantino pulls in making him look like the Samuel L. Jackson we’re familiar with other than the ponytail and braided goatee, then later having him remove the Kangol and let the hair down. Now all the sudden he looks like Super Fly’s evil cousin. Ugly and weird, no longer even half-assedly hiding his monstrous side. You don’t want to mess with Ordell. Jackie will have to, though.


Man, hearing Bobby Womack’s theme from ACROSS 110TH STREET coming in loud over the old Miramax (yeah, I know) logo to some cheers from the New Beverly crowd gave me goosebumps for real. The theater is famously “always on film” and this was Tarantino’s own print. The dust and imperfections at the start combined with the music made the movie feel authentically ‘70s for a moment before it hit me that this was how I first saw it as a brand new movie, on Christmas Eve 28 years ago at the multiplex where I tore tickets, cleaned theaters and later projected movies. I say this too often, I know, but seeing this felt like time travel.

It’s traveling to 1997, not reliving it, because I’m a different person now. Over the years I’ve seen JACKIE BROWN on film, VHS, DVD and blu-ray, but this was my first time seeing it as a man who recently turned 50 and could not help but think oh jesus, the math is clear, the numbers don’t lie, I am definitely not the young guy I think of myself as. I didn’t go out and get a motorcycle or an earring but I admit it’s been fucking with me, I have definitely been experiencing waves of some mild form of the ol’ mid-life crisis, becoming way more self conscious about how I look, how I dress, what my younger friends might think of me, contemplating my life choices, things I never did, big and small, second guessing even some of the things I’m happy with as the time to switch it up is more clearly finite.

Many said (and still say) that JACKIE BROWN is Tarantino’s “mature” movie. That’s true but it’s also 33 year old QT imagining middle age through his favorite b-movie actors. He was guessing what it might feel like, I was guessing how accurate it must be, now I’m sure both of us have a better idea but I’m still out here guessing because I don’t know what it feels like to be Jackie Brown or Max Cherry.

Forster as Max is still a treasure of a character and performance that stands alone, especially in its era. What strikes me about Max on this viewing is how much of his characterization is through implication. Forster’s approach is as matter-of-fact and no nonsense as Max’s personality, and two-decades-plus-younger QT fortunately doesn’t try to make him speak his truth or spell out what he’s going through. He doesn’t break down and blubber like John Rambo; his version of opening up to Jackie still sounds like a slightly more candid than usual talk with an emotionally unavailable dad. Maybe Tarantino was uncharacteristically aware that he didn’t know everything, so he left blank spaces for us to fill in.

We don’t even see much of the exciting part of Max’s job (though we hear a story about it), we just see him meeting with clients in his little office (with little bathroom) and picking up Jackie at the jail after Ordell bonds her out. We know how he feels about Jackie from the music playing when he first sees her, and the small kiss before she leaves him, and in between from him going to Sam Goody to buy a Delfonics tape, and then we know who he’s thinking about every time he listens to it in the car. He tells her he’s “getting out of the bail bonds business,” and admits hypothetically that he would be tempted to take a shopping bag full of money, but we don’t really know how tempted he is by the actual opportunity to take the money or to start a new life with Jackie.

Other than his brief stint as Jackie’s lookout/bag-carrier Max doesn’t chase his dreams, he just keeps doing his job. I love how he freely shares his professional knowledge whether he’s being threatened by Ordell (who he clearly hates but is still polite to) or advising Jackie. He doesn’t judge her or guilt her about anything. When he finds out she stole his gun he offers to let her borrow it for longer, and doesn’t press her about what she used it for. For his part of the heist the “husband waiting outside the dressing room for his wife” is both his cover story and pretty much his actual role. He doesn’t try to get rich, insisting on collecting no more than a 10% fee.

We don’t know what he thinks about he and Jackie’s age gap (only about 8 years), the cultural differences, or the opposite sides of the law they’ve traditionally been on, or if he even thinks those things are worth contemplating. I think it’s a more grounded version of the OUT OF SIGHT romance: he’s excited by the thought of it, but he thinks it could never work, so he’s just enjoying the moment before it passes. The time in the trunk, to put it in OUT OF SIGHT terms, where the trunk has more positive connotations.

That’s my guess, but we really don’t know why Max turns down going to Madrid with Jackie, or whether (or how badly) he ends up regretting it. That’s all left to the imagination. In his spiel to Louis about guns, Ordell says that everybody wants two .45s because “THE KILLER had a .45, they want a .45.” Max is not a guy who wants to be The Killer. He’s more a preview of a Chow Yun Fat character that didn’t exist yet: CROUCHING TIGER HIDDEN DRAGON’s Li Mu Bai, who’s resigned to a life of longing.

But it doesn’t feel like a sad ending to me. He liked having a little adventure, but he’s not that adventurous. Maybe he got his groove back. Jackie seemed to enjoy his company too, but after he says ‘no’ I doubt she ever looks back. She’s too busy celebrating getting out of there in one piece. “I’m not saying what I did was alright / trying to break out of the ghetto was a day to day fight,” as Bobby Womack sings. Here’s to everybody making it to Madrid, or meeting their Jackie, or at least finding a new appreciation for the Delfonics.

*I mean that literally! I keep this in my drawer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**I say this because there’s a poster for THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT at the theater, and in the script that’s the movie Max saw, and he tells Jackie about his crush on Annette Bening. But I always liked that in the movie the song you hear coming out of the theater as he leaves is “Jizz da Pit” by Slash’s Snakepit… the song on the end credits of JACKIE BROWN. I’m pretty sure Max was seeing JACKIE BROWN!

This entry was posted on Monday, September 29th, 2025 at 7:13 am and is filed under Reviews, Crime. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

25 Responses to “Jackie Brown”

  1. Love it! This is my favorite Tarantino, with OUTIH being runner-up. I love everything about this film, from Pam Grier down to Tiny Lister. Wonderful, pitch perfect casting right down the line, though Forster and DeNiro are my personal fave performances. Grier and SLJ are fantastic, of course, as is Michael Keaton. A home run. This is definitely my preferred brand of Tarantino (less violent, more chill, less stilted), which is to say that I need a moderating force, as undiluted Tarantino in his bag is less of my bag.

  2. And, yes, 110th street easily earns this film an extra half star. Stroke of genius!

  3. I’m firmly one of ‘those people’ (one of those annoying people that think this movie is by far the best thing Mr. Tarantino has done. Adding the exception, that I haven’t seen everything he’s done. As once it became obvious he was never going to make anything like Jackie Brown again, I sort of lost interest in his repertoire. Comics are cool and all. But 3+ hour comics with lots and lots and lots of text bubbles are kind of a drag, Just saying)

    Put it this way, I watched some of his movies more than once because they were on TV or whatever. Jackie Brown is the only movie I watched again because I specifically wanted to.

  4. I’m sorta the opposite; this one suffered from overhype for me, and it never works as well as I hope. Over time I’ve accepted that Elmore Leonard leaves me cold*, so pulling his vibe into a Tarantino flick just isn’t my thing. Solid movie with a wonderful cast, I just wish I enjoyed it as much as other people. (* Major exceptions: Out of Sight (one of my favorite movies), and Justified.)

    The threat radiating off Sam Jackson when he pulls on his stranglin’ gloves though, that’s a moment that’s stuck with me.

    I’m in SoCal at the moment, I’ll try lighting up in the Del Amo food court and let you all know what happens.

  5. I love Elmore Leonard more than I love Tarantino, but JACKIE BROWN is a rock solid meeting of the two. I agree, however, that Justified may somehow be definitive onscreen Leonard.

    That opening sequence through the credits is golden and so much more than “just” Across 110th Street, even if we ignore the homage to THE GRADUATE. That credit scene tells us about the movie and the character, specifically Tarantino adores Pam Grier, and, to misquote the late Barry Norman, why not? We get lots of time to admire her; we don’t need a save the cat moment, this is our protagonist, and just look at her! She walks, she runs, she stands still, colours swirl around her. She ain’t gonna be rushed, but when she needs to she can do what’s necessary: “You don’t know what you’ll do until you’re put under pressure”.

    Is it still fair to say that Tarantino was disappointed with the reception for this? No Oscar for Robert Forster, decent but not PULP FICTION level box office, patronising critics congratulating him for having made a “mature” movie that “lived up to that early promise”. RESERVOIR DOGS was a generational first feature, and PULP FICTION was a cultural bombshell. This really is as good as we, and he, might’ve hoped.

    That said, surely there wasn’t a better supporting performance that year than Forster’s.

  6. This one had a LOT to live up to at the time. PULP FICTION was one of those movies that seemed like it changed the world, and the three years between it and JACKIE BROWN felt like a decade. I had the PULP poster, the PULP soundtrack, the PULP screenplay. So JACKIE BROWN movie was THE event of Christmas Break ’97.

    It didn’t QUITE live up to those standards at the time. How could it? It wasn’t even trying to. It was Tarantino specifically NOT trying to out-PULP PULP. My esteem for it was high but guarded at the time, but it’s only grown since. This is a rock-solid movie that you don’t have to be in the Tarantino cult to appreciate.

    And the soundtrack is underrated. “Who Is He And What Is He To You?” was my jam, making me a Bill Withers fan for life, with “Strawberry Letter 22” a close second. But perhaps its greatest legacy was introducing me to Johnny Cash. I would have found him eventually but his oddball inclusion on a disc of soul classics (with the occasional psycho-surf deep cut) brought him to my earholes at least a decade early.

  7. Like you, Vern, I think it’s hard to come up with anything new to say about a movie that I’ve been hung up on for 28 years, other than LOVE, LOVE, LOVE…

    So, let me instead plug Stephen Frears THE GRIFTERS, which a recently had another look at. That movie is more or less a bluprint for Tarantino’s whole career, and especially JACKIE. Those who haven’t seen it, check it out! It’s on youtube in a decent version.

  8. Slightly off topic but I’m very excited to see THE LIMEY on that list. Just two weeks ago I revisited it for the first time since it came out and it was actually so much better than I remembered. And I remembered it being fantastic!

  9. Probably on the minority camp here (at least on this site), but it is in fact one of my least favorite QT movie… still excellent obviously (QT has a great track record, so even one of his “lesser” films is still better than most), but I never got into this one as much as the other ones… As it was said before in other comments, there was a lot of expectations after Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown – for me at least – never reached the same level. I was also at the time of its release so excited to see Robert De Niro getting into the QT universe, but somehow felt he was underused…

    I also prefer Out of Sight as far as Elmore Leonard adaptations go… now, having said that – I haven’t watched Jackie Brown in more than 10-15 years so maybe it is time I give it another chance. Vern’s review definitely makes me curious again about it…

  10. there was a lot of expectations after Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown

    Perhaps the inverse was true with me. I really didn’t care for Pulp Fiction at all, so I went into Jackie Brown not expecting much, therefore I was kinda blindsided how honestly good I thought it was.

    Granted, I can’t argue with a lot of the criticism it got (pulling a “The Killing”, and showing ‘the job’ in it’s entirety from three separate POVs makes sense when your movie is 84 minutes long and you need to do something to get it to feature length, not so much when it’s 154 minutes. ESPECIALLY if ‘the job’ consists of switching a couple of shopping bags. Perhaps cross-cutting may have been a tiny bit less irritating to your audience). But excessive grandeur aside, it was the first movie (and sadly, last) of Tarantino’s that felt like I was looking at actual human beings rather than cartoon characters. And frankly, I just liked spending time with them.

  11. I’m with jojo – I generally haaaaate Tarantino (haven’t watched any of his movies in full since the KILL BILLs) but I love this movie.

    And yeah, Vern, you’ve gotta review THE LIMEY. I bought an Australian Blu-Ray of it the week Terence Stamp died; it’s really an incredible movie.

  12. You really should add Weekend at Bernie’s to that list…

  13. Did you hit Sam’s Hofbrau?

  14. Bastard – no, I don’t know anything about that place. You recommend it? We did manage both Trejos (tacos and donuts), Mr. Charlie’s (vegan McDonalds knockoff), Scum and Villainy Cantina (karaoke night with L.A. theater kid nerd/hipsters), Lucky Tiki, Pam’s Coffy, the Academy Museum, Griffith Observatory, Varietopia at the Lodge Room, a place called the Goldline I think? (cool bar with records everywhere), some other places. Good city. Will come back.

  15. I’ve written on may other posts my feelings about QT – I’m not his biggest fan. JACKIE BROWN however is his (in my opinion) undoubtedly his finest film. I’ve felt that way since it first appeared. This to me is the one film where everything is exquisitely realized – every performance is spot on (including the two best in any of films – Grier & Forster) and Tarantino’s workmanlike uncomplicated direction perfectly meshes with the lowbrow, low-level nature of the story – simpleton criminals, cops, shysters, junkies, hookers and malcontents all being effortlessly bamboozled by the one smart woman in the room. I have know definite idea for Tarantino’s restraint ( I feel like it was his commitment to remain true to the nature of Leonard’s book and writing – don’t muck up the work of one of the world’s best late 20th century writers.) I don’t think Tarantino would ever approach an adaptation of another’s work now. He’s to ‘big’ for that. Even though it’s ‘long’ at 154 minutes it feels fast – unlike every other Tarantino film (except RESERVOIR DOGS) where they all include a scene or scenes that go on way to long – this one doesn’t.

    I’d still rate OUT OF SIGHT an even better film though. Man, Soderbergh was really cooking on that one – I think he felt like he had something to prove. And he still has never really received his due as a fantastic filmmaker and a really unique visual storyteller, with an almost unmatched ability with Mise-en-scène. And I feel like GET SHORTY is also unfairly overlooked in the Elmore Leonard film talk – it’s also a great piece of filmmaking, that also nearly perfectly evokes the best of Leonard’s writing.

    And VERN – I know it’s kind of cliched but if your ever back in Los Angeles don’t miss a dinner at Musso & Frank Grill – it’s not the most original destination, but man-o-man nothing evokes the milieu and history of the city and filmmaking like that joint. Both times I’ve been there we’re highlights of my trip and dining experiences.

  16. Miguel – I did go there once years back but you’re right I should go back. This time I saw it from across the street and of course it hits different after ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD.

  17. I’ll add my voice to the growing chorus of people proclaiming that this is Tarantino’s best. And I’m generally a fan of his. Some movies are better than others, but I don’t think he’s made a bad film. Death Proof might be underrated at this point.

    Reading Vern’s review, I was thinking about how good Samuel L. Jackson is at modulating his persona for different characters. We all know the common Samuel L. Jackson acting movies. He’s great at yelling, and he does fantastic work adjusting his stare. But even while using these recognizable mannerisms, he creates completely different characters. I mean, just check out Ordell here versus Zeus in Die Hard with a Vengeance. They’re completely different from one another, but they’re very recognizably born from Jackson’s usual tics and tricks. He’s not a chameleon. But he’s also not an actor who plays one type.

    As others have mentioned, this is the Tarantino movie with actual living and breathing characters rather than archetypes. And I don’t mind the archetypes, but this movie just kills me at the end.

  18. I know about Scum and Villainy only because it’s the frequent location of the Kevin Smith “Fatman Beyond” podcast on YouTube. Its owner also runs the technical aspect of the podcast (even when it’s not on location at Scum and Villainy) and occasionally interjects himself into it to make comments. So my pop culture world just got smaller!

    I haven’t rewatched JACKIE BROWN since it originally came out, even though I’m more of a Tarantino fan now than I was then. To me it has always seemed (and some of the comments here seem to reinforce this) that it is the Tarantino movie for people who don’t like Tarantino. The equivalent of THE STRAIGHT STORY or HAIRSPRAY or FAST COMPANY – “finally that weirdo made a real/normal movie.”

    And that might be the reason I’ve never revisited it. I prefer my oddball auteurs to let their freak flag fly, rather than clip their own wings to appease the prejudices of middlebrow critics. Anybody can make a crime movie. Only Tarantino can make a Tarantino movie, so let him.

    But the consensus is that this is a good movie, so I should probably rewatch it.

    Pam’s Coffy is a great name.

  19. Curt – I have heard a few of those episodes so I kept seeing staff and wondering if they were “Bamf.” The Star Wars theming of the place is really well done, although soiled by decorations for some kind of Harry Potter month they had going on. It was weird/interesting to see how many of the karaoke regulars were still comfortable wearing their Harry Potter costumes, but I was happy to see one pointedly wearing a “protect trans kids” patch.

    This is not a serious criticism but I need to share it with someone: I had to piss and I thought “oh good, I gotta see what the bathroom is like in this place” but then it was just a normal shitty bathroom.

  20. Vern, that’s interesting to hear. Conversely, there used to be a bar in Brooklyn (it closed during the pandemic) called The Way Station, which had a bathroom which was set deep into the wall, so they had the bright idea to mock up the entrance as the police box exterior of the TARDIS from Doctor Who, and to design the bathroom to look like the bigger-on-the-inside TARDIS interior with circles on the wall.

    The one time I went there, the bartender told me that this one decision made their bar an international tourist attraction for Doctor Who fans all over the world.

    I don’t remember what the rest of the bar looked like, I just remember the Doctor Who bathroom as its selling point. So maybe that balances out Scum and Villainy in some way.

  21. Saw this for the first time last night. Yeah, this is a classic alright.

    I think De Niro deserves a mention as well. Louis is this slumbering guy most of the film, but he just reeks of being a con. Jail has broken him.

  22. Nah, the Brau’s best days are far behind it, but it’s still kind of fun to stop by for a drink in the afternoon, and picture Ordell sitting around looking at tits while everything is going down at the mall.

    Am I the only person who actually feels sorry for Ordell at the end? Beumont snitched on him, Sheronda and Simone ran off on him, Max and Jackie ripped him off, Mr. Walker turned his back on him, Melanie was using him for a place to stay, and Louis was a fuck up; Ordell was the only honest crook in the movie, and he did “work” for that $500k, poor guy.

  23. Also: DEAD PRESIDENTS which has also one of those forgotten but great Chris Tucker performances

  24. Yeah, this is a great one, I’ve been meaning to see it again and need to get around to it. If you weren’t convinced Tarantino was an actor’s director by now, this movie should’ve done the trick: everyone here is excellent, and SLJ is especially so given how similar Ordell could’ve been to many of his other roles. Brutal sad-sack DeNiro is great too. And the main duo is entirely believable, even if they end just bittersweet.

    Although, wait, this memory is now a quarter century old Vern but… I’m almost positive I saw THE LIMEY because of you! Are you sure you never reviewed it, not even back on USENET or wherever?

  25. I awarded it “Best Picture – Comedy, Musical or Badass” in the 1999 Outlaw Awards, but I don’t believe I officially reviewed it. If I had, I would still need to redo it at this point because I’m sure what I wrote would’ve been pretty dumb.

    https://outlawvern.com/classic/OutlawAwards.html

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>