The Last Circus

tn_lastcircusFrom the monster clowns on the cover and the opening scene set in 1937 I really thought this was gonna be some kind of ghost or demon story, but it’s actually set in the sort-of-real-world. Director Alex de la Iglesia (DAY OF THE BEAST, 800 BULLETS) gives us another hard-to-classify brew of insanity, whimsy, tragedy and cruelty, like a Jean-Pierre Jeunet movie that got left out too long and went rancid.

It’s the tragic tale of Javier (Carlos Areces, EXTRATERRESTRIAL, I’M SO EXCITED), son of a clown (Santiago Segura, BLADE II, BEYOND RE-ANIMATOR, PERDITA DURANGO) who as a child watched his father’s troupe dragged away from a performance and conscripted to kill some rebels. Some resist, but his pop takes the machete they give him and goes to town, still wearing his makeup like a fuckin nightmare. Afterwards a Colonel (Sancho Gracia) enslaves him in a mine for years, until nerdy little Javier tries to avenge him with a guerrilla bombing, which has mixed results. On one hand, it kicks off a ruckus and some of the prisoners escape. On the other hand his father has his face stomped in by the Colonel’s panicking horse.

As an adultĀ  in the ’70s Javier gets a job as the sad clown in a traveling circus. He immediately gets a crush on the aerialist, Natalia (Carolina Bang, AS LUCK WOULD HAVE IT, WITCHING & BITCHING), but she’s the property of his abusive funny clown superior Sergio.

Sergio is a really interesting character and great performance by Antonio de la Torre Martin (I’M SO EXCITED, VOLVER). He’s a new kind of scary clown because he’s intimidating when he’s in the makeup interrogating the new hire, but he’s much scarier out of costume when they all go out for drinks after work. Now he’s a ’70s tough guy in a leather jacket, getting drunk, abusing Natalia both physically and emotionally right in front of everybody, who are obviously uncomfortable with it but too scared to rock the boat. He holds court like a rock star, everyone listening to him and applauding his stories and jokes.

mp_lastcircusBut Javier causes a scene simply by not laughing at Sergio’s favorite dead baby joke and saying that he doesn’t get it. It’s like a backwards version of the “am I a clown to you?” scene in GOODFELLAS where they actually are clowns and he mad because he doesn’t call him funny. Natalia stands up for Javier and ends up unconscious and bleeding on the floor before Sergio calms down and politely asks Javier what he wants for dessert.

After the incident Natalia decides she wants to hang out with Javier. You know, just as friends. He’s terrified. This is obviously dangerous for both of them, no matter how innocent. What Javier doesn’t get about Natalia, though, is that she’s screwed up and masochistically courts Sergio’s cruelty, sometimes getting off on it. I’m not justifying his abuse at all, the guy’s a piece of shit, but it complicates the situation for Javier, because he thinks he needs to rescue her, and doesn’t understand that she doesn’t want that. It becomes a really uncomfortable illustration of that juvenile male fantasy of being the nice guy who could save the beautiful girl from the asshole by being smarter and summoning a hidden reservoir of masculinity. And then when that doesn’t pan out it becomes that much more sinister line of thinking “all women say they want nice guys but really they want bad boys oh woe is me and therefore if I can’t have her [because I’m so nice] no one will!”

The thing is, despite all he’s been through, and despite his good intentions, it is hard to like this guy even before he goes mad. He’s not just a nerd, but a joyless, personality-less nobody. Most of the people at the circus are real nice to him, but he doesn’t offer much back, even when they ask direct questions. If there’s an interesting person inside there he doesn’t know how to share it with others. He’s not just a sad clown, he’s a blank clown. He can’t even say if he likes children or not, which offends Sergio. Despite his monstrous behavior, Sergio loves kids, and can’t understand people who don’t.

But Sergio does not love sad clowns. When he finds out there’s something between Javier and Natalia he beats him with a mallet on top of the strength testing machine. And he wins a prize. Brutal.

When Javier gets out of the hospital and comes back to “rescue” Natalia by beating Sergio’s face in with a trumpet he has no idea that he’s not the hero, that the rest of the troupe now know he’s psychotic, and that Natalia is not grateful at all, she’s terrified. He doesn’t even register that she was in the midst of passionate sex with her boyfriend and is suddenly sitting on the floor with his blood across her face. He thinks he’s fuckin Superman.

De la Iglesia is like Burton, Gilliam or fellow Spanish Civil War enthusiast Del Toro in that he squeezes all his passions and visual obsessions into his movies to give them an otherworldly, othertimely feel. So he’s got circus people going on a date to a Museum of Horrors and a carnival with a very elaborate ripoff of the Disneyland Jungle Cruise ride. It’s a larger than life horror movie and a dark fairy tale but sometimes it intersects with real historical events and people. Bits of era-appropriate current events and pop culture bleed into their world, for example when the circus shuts down Natalia ends up dancing at a place called The Kojak Club in front of a giant picture of Telly Savalas’s head.

But I think that the real de la Iglesia trademark is that the story takes a wild turn and I have no idea what type of movie I’m watching anymore. I mean, there still could be ghosts. Instead, Javier ends up on the run from the law, naked in the snowy woods, covered in dirt and leaves, eating raw meat off a deer that fell over a wall right into his lap. And it gets crazier from there, until he’s burnt off his face and stolen a pope costume and guns and he’s on a murderous rampage through the city. (To be honest I don’t like his evil clown look, but the way he achieves it is interesting.)

This all leads up to a big climax on a tower like a monster movie. And the scene charmingly ties in the skills of some of the circus performers including the daredevil motorcycle jumper who is trying to get to them and Natalia’s aerialist skills. Neither of which are much help.

I like this plot summary on the IMDb: “A young trapeze artist must decide between her lust for Sergio, the Happy Clown, or her affection for Javier, the Sad Clown, both of whom are deeply disturbed.”

I didn’t think about it like that, because Natalia never seems like the main character. The whole story is told through Javier’s point-of-view, starting when he’s a child long before we meet said young trapeze artist. But it’s true: she’s got the happy clown who is an abusive asshole but cares about kids and sometimes recognizes he has a problem, and you have the sad clown who is mostly nice to her but is completely unfeeling and then goes around fuckin maiming and murdering everybody and still doesn’t know he sucks. Two sides of a shitty coin.

(Another great example of this theme involves an old man offering kindness to him but that old man happens to be a despicable historical figure.)

The lines blur even more because Sergio survives the trumpet mauling when the troupe carry him to a nearby veterinarian and convince him to sew him up. He looks hideous and children literally call him a monster. Then he puts on his clown makeup and looks even worse. He looks like a hell of a villain, but now he genuinely is the victim who is trying to save Natalia from a dangerous man.

To me the one misstep is at the end when SPOILER Natalia decides she loves Javier and wants to go with him. I know she is a flawed individual and not necessarily supposed to be making the right decision, but this seems to validate his delusion of being the nice guy. It seems to say “Okay, I guess you are the hero of this movie,” which I don’t think he earned.

But this is a good one, a carnival ride that gets you dizzy and jumps off the tracks and ends in (spoiler) tragedy. The original Spanish title is “Balada triste de trompeta,” or Sad Trumpet Ballad. I think that’s a play on Spanish words for circus (not sure about that) and a bit of a joke about this guy destroying a guy’s face with the side of a trumpet, but it’s also a good description of the movie. A beautifully sad story of clowns and civil war and terrible relationships. <Sad trumpet sound.>

This review is dedicated to Nabrolean Dynamite. Although THE LAST CIRCUS is only 5 years old I swear he’s been trying to get me to review it every Halloween for a decade. Happy October, bud.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 7th, 2015 at 10:26 am and is filed under Horror, Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

25 Responses to “The Last Circus”

  1. Fuck, I LOVE this movie! It’s kind of a cliche to say, but the best way to watch it is without knowing anything about it. All in all I’m a huge de la Iglesia fanboy. His good movies are fucking brillant and his bad movies are seriously good and this might be his best. In a perfect world, he would be bigger than Tarantino!

  2. Yep. Love this one. Just a great watch all around. Especially the “Good, The Bad, and the Ugly” inspired opening credit sequence…

  3. flyingguillotine

    October 7th, 2015 at 8:48 pm

    Yeah, de la Iglesia can sometimes hit or miss, but when he hits he’s in a class of his own. I’m still trying to decide if LAST CIRCUS or PERFECT CRIME is his best film. But like the Coens, I still love the movies that don’t completely work or feel like minor efforts.

  4. This movie is so apeshit crazy and impossible to predict where it is going that it straddles the line of genius and insanity.

    I got to give it to Alex de la Iglesia. The guy is in a class of his own. Visually, thematically and in all ways, he has an absolutely unique voice.

  5. I tried to watch this once back in the day, and I couldn’t get through it. Not that I thought it was bad or poorly made, I just think I don’t like clowns. However, it sounds like I need to give it a second chance.

  6. BTW, I always thought the fear of clowns was one of those lame popculture jokes, (“Clowns are funny and kids love them, therefore I now say they scare me and they are evil, just to be different, LOL”), but I’ve met over the last few years a surpring amount of people, who are legitimately scared of them.

  7. CJ, I am not afraid of clowns, I just that I find them strange and off putting. Clowns also feel like some sort of cultural left over from a bygone era that have managed to linger, and will not go away despite their current cultural irrelevance. I also don’t believe that most kids like clowns. Clowns are something that some kids might like or tolerate, but for the most part clowns are something out of touch adults think kids would like. As a child or an adult I have never met a kid that was into clowns, but some how they continue to endure as an iconic symbol of fun for kids.

  8. Sorry if it sounded like I accused you of having Clownphobia. I know you don’t, but you not mentioning not liking them, made me think of that strange detail.

    Interesting enough, when I was a child, I didn’t know a kid that didn’t like clowns! Although of course I’m talking Kindergarten to elementary school age. But to be honest, afterwards the topic never came up, although I can’t remember anybody saying that clowns are lame or being afraid of them. So who knows?

  9. No worries CJ. I was just clarifying. Correct me if I am wrong but I bet clowns have a greater cultural significance in parts of Europe, because it is a part of the fabric of the cultural and tradition dating back to the days of the court jester and it has continued and evolved in other forms of entertainment throughout the ages.

  10. Honestly, I don’t know. I can imagine it’s because a circus, even a small one, is still more of an event here and not associated with the kind of dirty, criminal carnies that I see in American movies and TV shows all the time. But it’s an interesting theory.

  11. I never really thought of it but most of America’s most iconic clowns are evil and/or dangerous.

    The Joker, Pennywise, John Wayne Gacy, Ronald McDonald………

  12. Speaking of Clowns. The movie CLOWN was pretty wicked. A poor real estate agent that mutates into a ancient demon clown creature…thatĀ“s a story everybody can rely to. It also reminded me of that scene in Iglesias movie when the poor turns into the insane clown.

  13. CLOWN was downright nasty. I loved it. It’s got an ‘Eli Roth Presents’ on the cover, but I heard he only got involved after the director made a faux trailer and slapped his name on it.

  14. Yeah, that fake trailer went viral one day (As in the original meaning of “going viral”, not like today’s “viral” videos, that get put on the web with VIRAL VIDEO in their name, while huge press releases get sent to every blog on the web) and it said that the movie was directed by Eli Roth. Turns out the director just put Roth’s name in it to get attention and hoped that he would play along. And he did and helped him to get a full length version off the ground. Although I don’t know how involved he was in the end.

  15. AnimalRamirez1976

    October 9th, 2015 at 7:53 pm

    “A blank clown” is one of your finer poetic turns of phrase.

  16. So appearantly de la Igleisa recently said he’s gonna revive the Santo movie franchise?

    Hold on to your butts, that combo sounds amazing.

  17. I hope he has more success with it than with his FU MAN CHU project from the late 90s. But maaaan, that sounds amazing.

  18. If it does come through it should be interesting to see whether he uses Santo’s kid (also a wrestler, who took over his dad’s mask and gimmick as El Hio Del Santo) but is currently 52 years old.

    In any case Iglesia + the seedy world of lucha libre + random monsters (and or evil scientists who make super-powered midgets) sounds like someone plundered my wet dreams.

  19. What is going on with all these reports of clown-attacks this recent year? Now there has been reports of them in Sweden. What the fuck gives?!

  20. Scary clowns are like pumpkin spice: I find the thing itself innocuous and easy enough to avoid, if it weren’t for all the thoroughly annoying people who are constantly complaining about it.

    Very few people above the age of 10 are actually afraid of clowns, anymore than most people who don’t work in a Starbucks are actually assaulted by the prevalence of pumpkin spice in the fall. It’s just a meme that the unimaginative can pass off as an original thought because they have none of their own.

  21. Yeah, let’s be honest. One or two years ago some guy did the pretty funny thing where he dressed up as clown and randomly showed up somewhere, then the internet loved the story, some guy copied it, got publicity and others jumped on the bandwagon. By 2017 people will have moved on to other shit.

  22. Keith Griffin (Nabroleon Dynamite)

    May 17th, 2017 at 11:49 am

    I’ll gather my thoughts on this review once I get all of this pesky egg residue from off my face…

  23. I cannot begin to articulate the sense of relief that the above comment has brought me.

  24. Just passing by to recommend the new de la Iglesia joint EL BAR, which doesn’t add anything new to the “People trapped in an extreme situation turn on each other” genre, but because it’s by one of our greatest and most twisted filmmakers, it’s much better than 99% of the rest.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>