"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

F1

F1 (advertised as F1® THE MOVIE) is a slick, well made, big budget car racing/Brad Pitt movie. Nothing more or less, really. It’s from Joseph Kosinski, director of TOP GUN: MAVERICK, and continues in the exploration of a stubborn, aging hot shot butting heads with, teaching, and then passing the torch to a younger generation, and it shoots race cars similar to how that movie shot fighter jets. You’re clearly looking at the actors inside actual fast moving cars, not just green screen, and that goes a long way. Of course, flying was more exciting.

Brad Pitt (CUTTING CLASS) plays Sonny Hayes, legendary bad boy racer who had a terrible crash in the ‘90s (when he had long blond hair) followed by a stint as a professional gambler and cab driver before his surprising comeback. In the opening scene he helps his old buddy Chip (Shea Whigham, NON-STOP) and his team win in Daytona, then leaves without taking the trophy. I think he’s living in a van when another old friend, Rubén Cervantes (Javier Bardem, PERDITA DURANGO) tracks him down at the laundromat and asks for help with his racing team.

Rubén used to race against Sonny, now he wears incredible suits and owns the APXGP Formula One team, who are in last place and in danger of being sold by the board if they don’t win a Grand Prix. Of course Sonny refuses the call, then changes his mind and struts onto the track looking like the coolest dude anybody there ever saw. But they’re mostly not impressed.

The script is credited to Ehren Kruger (THE BROTHERS GRIMM), story by Kosinski and Kruger. It’s a corny old formula but hard not to enjoy. Sonny’s not only the guy who’s great at driving, he also has the greatest mind for observing weaknesses and concocting so-outside-the-box-everybody-thinks-he’s-crazy solutions. So this charming handsome overachiever comes in disguised as a has-been, causes chaos, makes everyone uncomfortable, eventually turns things around, seems like he’s absolutely blown it before suddenly oh my god it seems like things are turning around? It seems like we have a better shot than we ever have and we better take it? Am I reading this right?

In his audition he destroys the car while technically matching the statistics needed to pass. Later we learn that wrecking shit intentionally and playing dumb about it is one of his favorite strategies. Everybody thinks he’s fucking up and he doesn’t let on that he’s moving technicality chess pieces around, setting up the check mate. The race commentators (the movie type who commentate only the important information we need) definitely explain what he’s up to, but I still couldn’t always follow. He’s moneyballing them or something. Seems like dishonorable racing to me.

Academy Award nominee Kerry Condon (THE BANSHEES OF INISHERIN, UNLEASHED) plays Kate McKenna, first female technical director of a Formula One team and designer of the car. Condon is great at what might be considered an unchallenging task of clearly wanting to fuck Brad Pitt the first millisecond she sees him. Then when he seems to be messing things up she has a look of “Oh no my crush fucked up” as opposed to the “god damn it” everybody else has.

Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris, THE COMMUTER) is the promising rookie driver on the team who resents him, tells him straight up he’s not going to show him reverence, is kind of a cocky jerk about it but also pretty much always has a right to be mad about this fucker coming in and doing this shit. Sonny pisses him off, tells him off, calls him by his initials even though he doesn’t like it, and of course much later tells him he’s a great driver. Or at least “maybe even great.” One of the main generational differences is that Joshua’s cousin Cashman (Samson Kayo, THE BUBBLE) works as his manager and makes him use social media to raise his profile, while Sonny is annoyed that he looks at his phone all the time and cares so much about fame.

Joshua is also very close to his mother (Sarah Niles, the mayor in THE TOXIC AVENGER 2023), which makes him endearing while also allowing Sonny to say he lives with his mom. She, of course, notices that Sonny is handsome.

Kate works hard to design a more aerodynamic car, but truly earns her spot as spunky female lead when she stages a colorful intervention between the two egos via a poker game/ therapy session in a Vegas hotel bar. I called out loud exactly what Hayes would do – an act of uncharacteristic un-selfishness – and that it would cut directly to Sonny and Kate finally going at it, but I’m not complaining. Formulaic but effective. Sometimes it’s predictable because it’s what really ought to happen.

During the Daytona scenes I was thinking yeah, car races aren’t really that exciting to me. I’ve already seen TALLADEGA NIGHTS and CARS, I don’t really need this. But pretty soon he’s in the Grand Prix with cameras attached to the cars and yeah actually this looks good, this is more exciting than your standard movie car race. That’s why it’s F1® THE MOVIE. Though I didn’t understand all his trickery, I did find myself pretty invested in the races. They’re well done.

There’s drama/story arcs for the pit crew, some of the investors, there are scenes where they really could’ve benefited from a cameo by Molly Shannon’s drunk TALLADEGA character. But mostly this is about the movie star powers of Brad Pitt, with some room under his arms for Condon (who gets to use her accent), Idris and Bardem. Charisma as powerful as the engines of those cars.

Early on, the music representing that Sonny is an old guy sounds pretty ROAD HOUSE, but the score by Hans Zimmer is mostly synthy, in keeping with Kosinski’s filmography. Also there’s a part that seems like a guitar riffing on Zimmer’s TRUE ROMANCE theme and/or the song in BADLANDS that it was riffing on.

It’s always funny when an actor has their name in the opening credits but their part is already over with. That’s what happens to Shea Whigham. I was hoping when Sonny told him “I’ll see you down the road” it was set up for him to get summoned for help later on, but in fact it was setting up that Sonny really has a nomadic lifestyle, “like Caine in Kung Fu. Just walk from town to town, meet people, get in adventures,” help underdog racing teams win trophies. That makes for a pretty cool epilogue, and I won’t be the only one fantasizing about how funny it would be if Dominic Torretto pulled up in the scene like he did at the end of TOKYO DRIFT. I might not even be the only one thinking they should’ve added Brad Pitt into the scene from F9 where they added Kurt Russell into the scene from FURIOUS SEVEN where they added Jason Statham into the scene of Han’s crash from TOKYO DRIFT. We don’t have nearly enough guys there yet. We can add more.

I’m assuming that there are cameos by real drivers, but if so they must fit in more organically than in HERBIE: FULLY LOADED or whatever because nothing feels forced. I have never knowingly met a Formula One fan before and have no clue if there’s some reason for them not to like this, their official movie. I can report that a guy who doesn’t give a shit about racing and never will can still enjoy it.

I think F1 is a pretty silly thing to nominate for best picture, but that’s not the movie’s fault. I’ve been pretty into Kosinski since TRON: LEGACY even if it’s the Daft Punk score that makes it seem like his best work. Actually I think ONLY THE BRAVE is his best followed by TOP GUN: MAVERICK, which is kind of like a more spectacular but less moving version of ONLY THE BRAVE. And now this is the poor man’s TOP GUN: MAVERICK, but that’s okay. It’s pretty much exactly what it’s supposed to be. Not transcendent, but certainly competent. It feels your need for speed and it provides. There are worse things to do with IMAX cameras.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 27th, 2026 at 7:25 am and is filed under Reviews, Drama, Sport. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

13 Responses to “F1”

  1. As an F1 and film fan, I liked it. The other drivers, cars and even commentators are all the genuine article too, and it was filmed during a few race weekends. It plays fast and loose with the rules but that’s fair enough. When I saw it in at the cinema one guy kept complaining that in real F1 there aren’t crashes like those in the film, but the two biggest ones are both referencing actual incidents.

  2. I regret that i did not see this one in theater as it was made for that experience…
    I am not a huge fan of racing car movies but i did enjoy this one for what it is (similar as Days of Thunder for me)…
    Technically amazing, entertaining but light on surprise (like most sport related movies, story is using the same plot points).

    Definitely seems to be made specially for Brad Pitt – don’t think anyone else could have pulled it off the way it did. He still got it…

    Bit surprised to see it on the list of the 10 best movie nomination – but why not?

    I had read a few months ago that there could be a crossover sequel with Days of Thunder… again, why not?

  3. Hard for me to take the Oscars seriously as anything other than a highly skewed, highly I political (in every sense and scale), demonstrably lacking in posterity foresight (that is a redundant way to say that). It is valuable as spectacle and celebration and its own time capsule-esque way, to be sure.

    With that said, there is everything to love about this film in general and at this moment in film industry history — not as savior nor as model for every other film, but as one type of film whose unique attributes are a bet positive for anyone who wants to have a good time in a theatre watching a non-legacy-ip film that does only and exactly what it promises in spades. I’ll take that over GREEN BOOK. CRASH, etc any day.

  4. I really enjoyed this one. Sturdy chassis, well-oiled, fine-tuned, aerodynamic, good around the corners, etc. Yeah, it’s about an old maverick who doesn’t play by the rules and shows the youngins what-for, but it’s also about a broken old guy trying to prove to himself he still has it and is in it for the love of the game. I think it succeeds.

  5. I felt this was sort of the opposite of The Smashing Machine which I also saw recently, but both left me shrugging. In F1 it felt to me that most of the movie was an info dump / primer for non-F1 fans that also attempted to shoehorn in a narrative about people I didn’t have enough time with to care about. The faceless F1 announcers were essentially main characters. For TSM, I went in knowing nothing about Mark Kerr and left the movie knowing barely slightly more so ended up watching a dramatic narrative about people I didn’t know enough to care about. I’ve been told that Christy is the movie that essentially spits the difference between the two.

    Also in F1, if the point was to showcase the skills of the drivers, why was so much of the movie Pitt exploiting loopholes to win or showing us that the victories were because they were able to modify the car so much that it didn’t matter who was driving?!

  6. I think you need have grown up with a dad to want to see this movie. My dadichlorian count is way too low for me to get anything out of it.

  7. I had a dad, I am a dad, and this movie just looked like “Toxic Masculinity and Gross Rich People Excess Masquerading as Inspirational and Cool, the Motion Picture” to me.

    Not sure if I’m alone on this but has any actor gone from “he’s a genuinely good actor and I’ll watch anything with him in it” to “No thanks, I’m washing my hair that month” as badly as Brad Pitt? I was reminded of this when I read the TREE OF LIFE review again, as that seemed like the last time I saw him in something and appreciated his casting and performance (I did not like OUATIH very much.) Maybe BULLET TRAIN was worthwhile but i haven’t coughed up two hours to give Brad Pitt that I didn’t wish I could get back, in over a decade, it seems.

  8. My dad was an F1 fan (surprising for an American, I know) so I would occasionally see him watching these races on TV, before the divorce. And he took me to one once; holy hell, was that loud, and I say that as someone who saw Motörhead live six times. Anyway, I’m in a mood for something that hits all the beats in a comfortably predictable fashion (been watching a lot of network TV cop shows on Hulu lately) so I think I’ll check this out.

  9. Ever since I started to pay attention to him in HBO’s Perry Mason, I’ve really enjoyed it whenever Shea Whigham shows up in something. Pure character actor, never showy, does his job well and clocks out at 5. I have no interest in learning anything about him or even checking in on what he’s going to be in next. I just like the surprise of seeing him and going ayyy, it’s my guy!

  10. I think, if you enjoyed TOP GUN 2, it’s a good bet you’ll enjoy this one, and the inverse. Like 85%. It’s not about celebrating rich people: the main protagonists are not rich, one of the main antagonists (to the extent that there are any) is rich. It’s definitely a lot about masculinity, but smearing it as “toxic masculinity” is reductive, because you have lots of different kinds of conflict and relationship-building and relationship-repairing —people having to learn and feel out and negotiate each others’ interpersonal styles, across genders, generation, and social status to some extent. (Despite the older white guy, younger black Anglo guy, I couldn’t find a lot of interesting racial subtext.)

    In any event, I see the film as first and foremost about screwing up, giving up, getting back up; fear and self-protection, vs calculated risk-taking vs recklessness; the power and excesses of stoic grit; “toxic” (excessive) ego and individualism vs humility, teamwork, and teachability; mentorship; learning / personal growth; generational divides; developmental psychosocial stages (young hungry, upstart vs weary, self-exiled “never was”); being motivated by the purity of doing something very difficult very well because you love it vs. doing it out of fear or over-calculation and being too in your head; authenticity; letting your actions speak vs. often ineffectual words; and dare I say striving for excellence.

    Beyond that it’s compelling and engaging. It feels mostly quite brisk and good tense throughout with good judicious humor and hitting the usual feel good beats pretty well without inducing groans.

    Arguably, Pitt is a bit of Mr. Perfect / Mr. Know-it-all here on the surface, but there is much more, and the film does a lot to leaven and complicate that (much more so than Cruise in MAVERICK). He’s very good, he’s very seasoned, and he’s a strong personality, but he’s not Superman or adorable, or anything. He’s in the Clint Eastwood man’s man curmudgeon role to be sure, but the movie knows that, and is more about these people need each other than all of these people but Brad Pitt need Brad Pitt. So more of a Rocky-Creed sort of deal but more competitive, less warm, more reluctant frenemies and will or won’t they become actually mutually trusted teammates.


    I liked Pitt in OUATIH, Ad Astra, and Workd War Z. Haven’t seen much else he’s done the last decade.

  11. Skani- see, that’s the kind of nuanced, thoughtful evaluation/rebuttal that could only result from, like, actually watching the movie. Who has time for that? I got knees to jerk, man.

    I think I’m just put off by the formula (rimshot) of this movie in general, and also the business model behind the movie. Its like if they made the NFL or FIFA into a movie titled after the corporation and it’s about some smug looking movie star I have to swallow as an inspirational underdog character. It feels like a movie they would make for The Rock to star in. I also think about giving money and time to Apple or Amazon and it feels like patronizing Braun or BMW in the 1930s. If it was Shea Whigham in the lead instead of Joe Black, maybe I’d feel more forgiving of it. There are plenty of (ok, maybe one or two) inspirational movies about the value of team building and resilience among intensely competitive men that I have enjoyed, and most of those were probably made by studios that contribute to the enshittification of the world as much as any other. But your theory is correct- I skipped TOP GUN MAVERICK for the same reasons I scoff at this one. The need for speed just translates to me as “guy who tailgates you in the right lane when you’re already 15 over the limit approaching a school zone.” I see that guy for free every day. Just go around and get to the red light 5 seconds before me, we can trade finger guns in the rear view mirror.

    Like and subscribe to my channel for more old man gripe takes from half watched trailers, guys!

  12. I’ll defend anyone’s right to skip movies like F1 and even respect their decision to stay at least five miles away from a theater screening it.

    What I will push back a little on, though, is the criminal overuse of the term “toxic masculinity.” Somewhere along the way it became shorthand for anything remotely male‑centered. Shitty behavior—especially toward women, kids, or anyone less privileged—absolutely deserves to be called out. No argument there.

    But when the label gets slapped on guys tinkering with cars, racing, getting competitive, or—brace yourself—showing a healthy attraction to women and having consensual sex, it stops being critique and starts being reductive. Not every display of testosterone is a manifesto for the patriarchy. Sometimes it’s just… men doing man stuff without needing a UN resolution.

  13. First of all I loved the movie, formulaic as it was, warts and all. It is crafted like the crowdpleasing movies of old, and all of its good parts make a great experience.
    As to the “toxic masculinity” I’m with KayKay , people should stop using some words “just because” especially if they don’t make the effort to see the movie. Yes, I get how “BRAND – the movie” can be off-putting as a title, but these opinions are now being written months after release and after tens of reviews from critics / thousands from moviegoers. It’s a bit disingenuous and “baity” to “not see it” because of “feelings” after the movie has been universally praised despite the clunky title and brand association.
    Top gun Maverick for me was peak blockbuster filmaking up there in the thin air tops of the best of McTiernan / Bay / Tony Scott. F1 is ALMOST up there with it, not a 9.5 but an 8.5

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>