13 Assassins (1963)

Thanks to Takashi Miike’s outstanding remake, this samurai classic has finally been released with subtitles for the Japanese impaired. Also, thanks to the remake, I knew to watch it.

If you saw the remake then you know the story: a guy commits sepukku in protest of the Shogun’s brother, Lord Umigetsu. This forces the ruling class to discuss the uncomfortable fact that a total fuckin maniac is in line to inherit the throne. You can imagine how socially awkward this would be in any society, but this is one where they take ranking, protocol and manners very seriously. I mean, I just told you how he had to kill himself in protest. Not write an editorial.

So for the greater good a faction of the government devises a secret plan to assassinate him. This is like the secret black ops part of the empire, I guess. A respected samurai is put in charge of the mission, he recruits a team of killers (there’s one guy whose wife doesn’t want him to go – like Fackler in POLICE ACADEMY). They set out to kill the Lord. After some tracking they figure out a strategy for driving Umigetsu and his 52 guards into a specific trail, so they get there ahead of time and prepare the mother of all ambushes.

Of course the remake is more graphic. In the original Umigetsu is a rapist and killer, but the worst stuff is off screen. There’s no limbless victim, no “total massacre.” The new one has a much longer and bloodier final battle. But the excellent structure and story that I loved so much in the remake are pretty much straight out of this original. There’s some great sword fighting, and more action than some of these old samurai movies, but it’s really more about the planning and waiting. The cat getting ready to pounce. It’s about strategy – predicting where the enemy will go, how he will react, interpreting what it means when things don’t happen as planned, making the right move to not tip off the enemy.

Samurai are so cool because of their codes of honor. They have great fighting skills, they have swords, but they also care about ethics. So it’s notable that killing the Lord is not the end of the movie. When he’s cornered he turns into a coward, threatening with his family connections, screaming for his men to help, not trying to handle it himself. He’s a fuckin baby. So that’s not the climax. Then they gotta deal with Hanbei, the samurai bodyguard who failed in his duty to protect him. That’s the guy the 13 fear and respect.

It’s a nice looking black and white movie with good production value – lots of actors, complex fights, big detailed sets for the siege. Time passes and the weather changes. Sometimes it’s foggy and atmospheric like a classic horror movie. Even though the remake one-upped it, it’s impressive how elaborate their plan is. They wedge the enemy into narrow passages, maintain high ground for arrow and spear superiority, they even plan to dump a bunch of logs on their heads, Ewok-style.

A couple years later, director Eiichi Kudo did a movie called ELEVEN SAMURAI. I wonder if that one is good? Maybe a slightly pared down version of this one. Or maybe if you’ve seen this one that would just seems kind of half-assed. Or 11/13-assed, anyway.

This is a great movie, but I have to admit it made me want to watch the remake again. In Miike’s version it was hard to keep track of all the characters, but he gave more characterization to alot of them than the original did. He took most of what was great about this and amplified it. It’s a good argument for the validity of remakes, even of good movies. I’m glad both of these exist.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 1st, 2012 at 1:43 am and is filed under Action, Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

7 Responses to “13 Assassins (1963)”

  1. Knox Harrington

    August 1st, 2012 at 2:06 am

    If you’re in a Samurai mood, maybe try checking out some of the more modern Samurai films, like The Twilight Samurai, The Hidden Blade and When The Last Sword Is Drawn. Most of them did very well in Japan and won a lot of Japanese Oscars and shit.

    They’re a tad slow for Western audiences, but I love how they remind me of the older Kurosawa and even Ozu films. Plus, the fights are rather good, even though you won’t be getting any 50 minute blood orgies like the one in 13 Assassins.

  2. Vern – you should definitely go out of your way to see Miike’s new remake of Hara-Kiri if it makes it to Seattle. It’s a samurai film but almost entirely unlike 13 Assassins, save for its devotion to bad-ass-ness of ethical righteousness. It’s very quiet and humane, it almost doesn’t feel like Miike is the one who made it. The only real drawback to the film is that it is in fairly unnecessary 3-D (although the scenes in the snow look great.)

  3. Haven’t seen the Miike version yet (looking forward to it), but the original HARAKIRI is a pretty excellent film. It’s a slow, tense burn to an awesome (if relatively brief) action climax, with a fairly affecting bit of social/class commentary around the way. The remake, from what I gather, sounds like its fairly faithful, and I’m particularly curious to see how Miike handles the memorable forced-harakiri scene, which was already pretty gruesome (if not overtly graphic) for a film from that era.

  4. The Original... Paul

    August 1st, 2012 at 10:51 am

    Y’know I never knew “13 assassins” was actually a remake? I gotta look this one up.

  5. It seems like Miike has given up on samurais for now – he’s made half a dozen movies already since HARA-KIRI 3D – but that’s just how the guy operates. Too bad. I wonder if he would have dared/gotten permision to take on one of Kurosawas films?

  6. Yeah, color me ignorant, because I didn’t realize that Miike’s movie was a remake. I thought it was a partial homage to Seven Samurai. Outside of Kurosawa and Miyazaki, Japanese cinema is kind of a black hole for me.

  7. The Original... Paul

    August 2nd, 2012 at 3:36 pm

    Oh, I definitely think there’s more than a hint of “seven samurai”, at least in the remake. Both films have a character who’s a belligerent drunk who wants to play samurai but gets accepted by the real samurai and ends up being their “voice of the common man”, for one thing.

    Weirdly, remake-wise, another comparison that leapt to mind in terms of the portrayal of the villain was “Enter the Dragon”. There’s the same long list of the villain’s crimes at the beginning of the film, before we even meet the villain in the flesh. The same “multiple motives to kill this guy” motif. It’s kinda interesting that both villains represent absolute corruption of power, albeit in very different ways, in “Thirteen Assassins” and “Enter the Dragon”. It does make me wonder, did “Enter the Dragon” take its cues from the original 1963 film? Or maybe did the remake take a few cues from “Enter the Dragon”? Maybe I’ll decide that question when I watch this one.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>