"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple

I liked 28 DAYS LATER when it came out in 2003 and I liked 28 WEEKS LATER when it came out in 2007, but I still have never revisited them. So I’m honestly very surprised how invested I am in this followup trilogy that started last year with Danny Boyle’s 28 YEARS LATER and now continues with Nia DaCosta’s 28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE.

It was such a surprising choice: Boyle and writer Alex Garland finally made their long anticipated third film, but also prepared a script for the director of LITTLE WOODS and CANDYMAN 2021 to shoot back-to-back with it. Boyle’s movie set up the new characters, and now DaCosta continues their story, but other than a few homages during zombie attacks she doesn’t mimic Boyle’s style at all. Cinematographer Sean Bobbitt (THE PLACE BEYOND THE PINES, WIDOWS, THE RHYTHM SECTION), editor Jake Roberts (HELL OR HIGH WATER, MEN) and composer Hildur Guðnadóttir (JOKER, TÁR) all go in very different directions from the distinct ones Boyle’s team chose, giving us a calmer and more traditional (not shot on iPhones) but still very effective look at this world of a zombie infection pandemic and its survivors.

In the first 28 YEARS a boy named Spike (Alfie Williams) left the safety of his colony for a rite of passage: his first mainland zombie hunt. In the process he lost his mom, lost faith in his dad, abandoned his home and got rescued by a gang of scary crazies in track suits and long blond wigs. Now their psychotic ringleader Sir Lord Jimmy Crystal (Jack O’Connell, FERRARI) offers Spike a trial to become one of his acolytes, who he calls his “Fingers.” Spike just has to win a death match against one of the current members is all. So it’s really more of a chance for a guy to kill a little kid than it is an audition.

I found the introduction of the Jimmies at the end of the last movie to be pretty jarring. They seemed so tonally different from what we’d been watching, and alot to swallow even before I read about the cultural context that their look is based on an English radio and TV host who was exposed as a child molester. Jimmy Crystal’s origin story opens that film – he was one of a group of kids sheltered together watching Teletubbies when the rage virus shit hit the fan, and then he witnessed his minister father letting zombies eat him, welcoming them as the kick off to the end times. As a post-apocalyptic adult Jimmy has turned himself into a cult/gang leader, who seems to really believe he’s the son of “Old Nick” (Satan), and hears his voice telling him what to do. They basically commit depraved Manson Family type crimes, doing home invasions, tying people up, tormenting them with these chances to fight the Fingers. But he frames it all as religious ritual, sermonizing, calling it “charity” when the members skin people alive.

If Spike can’t join them they’re gonna kill him, so he gives it a shot. It’s basically the adult Jimmy Shite (Connor Newall) bullying and beating up a kid, taunting him, knocking the knife out of his hand, giving it back, knocking it out again. To the Jimmies’ shock and surprise Spike figures out a way to beat him. Maybe it just pushed my particular buttons but I felt this was more upsetting and disgusting than your average screen death – one of those rare acts of cinematic violence that really gets under my skin. It’s a type of injury you don’t see in many movies, and just a very distressing way to die that turns him from sadistic bully to scared kid as he realizes what’s happening. And all the sudden the Jimmies didn’t seem so silly to me.

Spike comes along as the new Jimmy. Doesn’t seem to think he has a choice. Some seem pissed at him for killing their friend Jimmy Shite, even though it’s their stupid rules he was following. The one Jimmy that seems to have a little empathy left is Jimmy Ink, a good use of Erin Kellyman, who made an impression on me in the small part of Enfys Nest in SOLO so I paid attention to her when she showed up in THE GREEN KNIGHT, The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, and the Disney+ sequel series to WILLOW that was pretty fun but no longer exists because it got Zaslav-ed. She has a strong screen presence that works well for a character who has to convey so much with her expressions, but also pairs well with the gaudy costume and occasional cool knife slashes.

The gang also includes Jimmy Fox (Sam Locke), Jimmy Snake (Ghazi Al Ruffai), Jimmy Jones (Maura Bird) and Jimmy Jimmy (Robert Rhodes), but the other most memorable one is the particularly crazed Jimmima (Emma Laird, THE BRUTALIST), who taunts victims with “The Tinky Winky Dance.” I assume Jimmy Crystal taught them all about Teletubbies, since he seems older and pop culture ended 28 years ago. But they love to joke about them and I found it bleakly hilarious when some of their horrific violence was followed by an, “Again again!”

Since Jimmy and the Fingers encountered Spike, that means they’re within walking distance of the titular Bone Temple, which appeared scary-as-fuck in 28 YEARS LATER until we got to know its creator Dr. Ian Kelson (Ralph Fiennes, THE AVENGERS) and accept that he was not a psycho, but a thoughtful and sensitive man genuinely honoring the dead by cleaning their remains and building them into an ossuary. The heart of THE BONE TEMPLE is the story of Kelson and the Alpha zombie he named Samson (Chi Lewis-Parry, “Negative Dude,” THE RUNNING MAN 2025).

You remember Samson. The big muscle guy with the giant veins and Coke-can-sized dong who stalks the area, roaring and ripping heads off with the spines still attached. This time there’s a great scene where he’s snacking on brains out of the top of a skull he cracked open and I realized it was just like me sitting there watching him and munching popcorn.

A key development in 28 YEARS LATER was Kelson’s choice to drug Samson with blowdarts rather than attempt to fight him. It was smarter than waging a battle he would’ve lost, but it came out of his belief that zombies are still people. THE BONE TEMPLE pays that off. ONE SENTENCE SPOILER: Samson comes back wanting to be shot up with morphine again, so they start to hang out and get high together, eventually bringing the zombie to a mental state where he has some memories.

We no longer have the novelty of coming in expecting Kelson to be a maniac and realizing he’s got the best attitude of anyone in the movie. But we do have the benefit of being comfortable that he’s not going to turn evil, so we can just enjoy hanging out with him. He’s surrounded by skeletons but he has a real appreciation for life, from contemplating in nature to dancing to old music. He only owns a handful of records, so his life is mostly soundtracked by Duran Duran.

So we’ve got this meditative story about the peace between Kelson and Samson, but it’s threatened by the proximity of the Jimmies who are wandering the land hungry like the wolf, tormenting those they encounter. Though DaCosta gives us some bits of good ol’ zombie gore (special makeup effects creative supervisor: John Nolan, THE NUTCRACKER: THE UNTOLD STORY), most of the horror is the much more disturbing living-on-living kind. The Fingers terrorize a family of survivors on a small farm and force Tom (Louis Ashbourne Serkis, THE KID WHO WOULD BE KING) to choose one to fight to the death. Just like the opening scene, I found this to cut deeper than the average horror concept, because it forced me to consider what I would do in Tom’s place. Jimmima seems like the one who would be easiest to overpower, and therefore the smartest strategic choice, but if it was easy, wouldn’t that kind of make it worse? Would I have a harder time going through with it than if I really had to fight for it? And would I ever forgive myself? Wouldn’t I feel better about it if it was one of those asshole guys?

Well, kind of a moot point, because he does choose Jimmima and quickly regrets it. But this is a sequence that sent my mind to ugly places before exploding into some very entertaining, chaotic mayhem and dark humor. Feels like a possible classic.

Eventually Jimmy Crystal and Dr. Kelson will collide, and upside-down-cross-wearing Jimmy will have to decide what to make of a weirdo with iodine-stained skin living surrounded by piles of skulls. We’ll get to experience the science vs. religion debate through the novel angle of self-declared atheist vs. satanist. As we know from his turn as the dancing master vampire in SINNERS, O’Connell can layer the charismatic, the humorous and the sinister in interesting ways, and here again he gets to mix the nuanced with the outrageous. We have to gauge how much he really believes his bullshitting has come true.

Fiennes is unsurprisingly superb in the movie. It’s just such a treat that he gets to play a very memorable horror character who stands out for just being human and kind and gentle. He’s more subtle and down to earth than in plenty of his dramas, though this also offers him a unique opportunity to display other talents. There was a shot of Kelson in the trailer that reminded me of the monsters dancing around at the beginning of NIGHTBREED, and I didn’t understand how that would make sense for his character. If I had tried to guess I wouldn’t have gotten it in a million years. I’ll leave it for you to discover, except to say that there’s a strange scene that is hilarious and beautiful and filled me with joy even in the midst of tension and tragedy. It’s a really funny turn of events that also I think celebrates some things about life and culture. It works on different levels. I like movies.

I don’t want to say whether this is better than or not as good as 28 YEARS LATER, because I see it both ways. The first one was better in the sense that it felt much more new, it introduced most of these characters and the state of this world, and though this is a beautifully made film on all levels it’s easy to miss the wilder, more punk rock energy of Anthony Dod Mantle’s iPhones and the Young Fathers’ music. I wonder if Boyle’s movie might also have a little more to chew on in terms of both ideas and heavy emotions. But if so they’re presented in a much more scattershot fashion, thrown out there more as suggestion or set up than as exploration. I appreciate that THE BONE TEMPLE feels neater and more complete on its own, a more solid, satisfying storytelling experience. It’s a good sequel because it takes the hand off of these characters and ideas and carries them all the way to the finish line. (Well, okay, I guess it hands off a couple of them to the next runner, which will be Boyle, unless the unimpressive box office of this one un-greenlights the finale.)

I didn’t know I really cared about an ongoing 28 UNITS LATER saga, but these two YEARS episodes have been some of the better horror movies of the period and an impressive use of the “horror franchise” format. THE BONE TEMPLE will obviously live on as one of my go-to joke sequel subtitles (along with FAREWELL TO THE FLESH) and in references to, you know, doing it, but I’m happy to report that it’s also a good movie I very much recommend to my fellow horror partakers. Please enjoy all of your visits to any and all Bone Temples.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 21st, 2026 at 3:29 pm and is filed under Reviews, Horror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

12 Responses to “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple”

  1. Overall I liked 28 Years Later presents The Bone Temple: From the Book of 28 Days Later. Wasn’t expecting to love it like I did the prior. I absolutely loved everything with Fines but was more cool on the other story of evil(er) Jimmy Sevil but that’s more personal preference in horror though. So a step down for me but not too much.

    28 Years Later: From the Book of 28 Days Later is probably my favorite of last year but that’s because it legitimately helped me come to terms with the death of a loved one. So biased I suppose.

    Looks like we may not get that third entry due to box office but I’m happy with what we got.

  2. Loved everything with Fines but was cooler on the evil(er) Jimmy Savile story. That’s more personal preference in horror/story though. It is at the very least did a Strangers riff better than the current Strangers movies.

    28 Years Later was my favorite of last year but that’s mainly because it helped me comes to terms with the death of a family member from a few months before. With talks of box office seems we may not get the third entry but I’m happy with what we got.

  3. I liked it well enough, but I guess the fact that it’s a more “normal” type of movie and also far less surprising in terms of plot developments I walked out of the theater underwhelmed. If the first one had been done in this way I would not have wanted to see a sequel to it, that’s for sure. Too prestige TV-ish with the clean, nice look and the graphic violence.
    I will of course see the next one because it’s Danny Boyle again.

  4. That head popcorn-munching scene is similar to one in the stunning WHEN EVIL LURKS… I wonder if it was an (unconscious, of course) influence. The femoral artery bit is also ridiculously effective… between this and BLACKHAWK DOWN, I too have realized it’s one of the few types of on-screen gore that will make me wince.

    Everyone I personally know who’s seen it preferred this one to the previous movie. I’m torn, because I really like the energy of part: the first, and I also thought the coming-of-age story was more impactful. Cinematographically, I’ll also give the advantage to the first; Even though I didn’t appreaciate all of Boyle’s experiments, it did feature some beautiful shots and compositions, while this one didn’t really bowl me over at any point on that front. This one does work better as a horror movie, and the narrative is a little tighter (but still weirdly disgressive, with the clarification that I consider that a positive)
    The most important thing though is that both moveis share a warmth and humanity that’s very much appreciated at this point in western civilization. I do think there were glimmers of it in 28 DAYS LATER, but nowhere even close. MILD SPOILERS: There’s one touch I really appreciate here where the script makes sure to not paint Dr. Kelson as a saint late in the movie, just a scared old man, which makes his principled stand just that much affecting; I could not love the guy more after this film.

    And a certain Maiden song now features prominently in two of my favourite movies/scenes of the last few years. 12-year-old me is ecstatic.

  5. I really love these 28 YEARS movies and I find myself stunned moment by moment by the way they reveal themselves. I went into the first expecting it to be the odyssey of Spike and his dad braving the wilds of the infected mainland, but of course that sequence resolves halfway into the film and I was just bowled over as it became clear what the film had up its sleeve.

    Ditto Jimmy and the Fingers, SPOILER ALERT going forward… The series of reveals we get on this crew between the two films feels remarkable and maybe unprecedented. From “just how badass are these weird Lost Boys ninjas? but also they seem kinda sus?” to “oh, that’s a really disturbing gang initiation ritual, but at least they’re mainly interested in killing infected probably right?”… and so forth. Just peeling back the layers one scene at a time, until we’re reading Spike’s reactions in the barn and knowing that whatever they mean by “charity” and “shirts” must be the worst thing you can think of.

    To me, this veer into extreme horror was such a surprising shift in both tone and subject matter that it really makes me wonder why people thought this was a safer or more conventional film. Safer would have been to replicate the specific successes of its predecessor, right?

    And it continued to surprise me throughout. When Jimmy Ink bespies Dr. Kelson and Samson, I would never have imagined what she concludes, but when she reveals it: duh! Of course!

    Nor would I have ever guessed the details of Kelson’s treatment of Samson. Dosing himself with morphine and the gamble of falling asleep next to his patient. The decision to euthanize Samson, or what causes Kelson to abort a moment later.

    And it all builds towards this outrageous confrontation between Jimmy and Kelson where they both act so true to their vividly drawn characters, and yet still nothing proceeds as I expected. Like, is Samson going to roll up and lay waste to the Fingers at the crucial moment? No, he’s going to take on the visage of Satan himself to seal the utter desolation of Jimmy Crystal’s soul.

    To echo Vern, this here is why I love the movies!

  6. Adored this – such a shame the box office is so bad, we really can’t have nice things.

    I hope 28 Years Later 3: the bone temples plural still gets made, as I do think it’d benefit from this finding its feet on streaming and a more bankable star in tow.

    Both Years films are 5/5 to me and i find it hard to say which is better. On paper I love the crazy way Boyle shot and edited the first, and the amazing score.

    But I think they wouldn’t have suited Bone Temple. I think the climax wouldn’t stand out as much if the big needle drop didn’t contrast with a less song-y and subtler score. I reckon the tonal shift registers more because the film is so subdued til then. Whereas almost all of the first years is cranked up to 11 already.

    I think the ending of the first caused upset because Boyle had to find a way to go to 12. And for some, 12 is too far. So shot in Boyle’s style, the big scene would feel like an already crazy film going a step too far rather than something gathering its breath and then letting loose.

    It is such a wonderful film though, my god. Adored it.

  7. I hear nothing but good things about the movie, but I feel like the bad box office can be blamed on “Humans are the REAL monsters” horror movie fatigue. Yeah, that angle was part of the series since part 1, but even then the general opinion was “Once they meet the soldiers, the movie drops in quality.” And that was a good decade before it became an overused cliche! So you can’t blame the public for seeing a trailer that focuses on a bunch of cackling humans torturing other people and staying mostly away from it until it hits streaming.

  8. I liked the last one, but I’m dragging my feet on this one. It’s too soon. I feel like I just saw this movie. I’m not ready for to see it again just yet. I’d imagine a lot of people feel that way. We just had this meal. They didn’t give us a chance to get hungry again before they trotted out another course.

    The decision to focus the trailer on the absolute worst part of the previous movie (the Jimmies) is probably not helping. I’ll see it eventually, but I don’t feel compelled to rush out.

  9. Renfield– I’m in total agreement. Loved the whole movie, and then that confrontation between Jimmy and Kelson raised everything up to another level. You’re never sure how much of Jimmy’s schtick is an act and how much he believes what he’s saying and it seems like he’s clearly bullshitting his fingers, making up a story of having seen another bone temple elsewhere, but when he finally talks to Kelson, he sincerely asks if he’s satan. It’s funny, it’s disturbing, it’s maybe even a little pathetic.

  10. I think the film does a great job of making Jimmy simultaneously a true believer in what he spouts, but also someone who’s using it to have power over people, to the extent that something that threatens that kind of throws him for a loop. It shouldn’t work, but it does. It’s also amusing to me personally that the whole Jimmy Saville stylings is never directly explained, or even questioned, which I expected Kelson to at least do at some point, but I guess he’s seen enough weird shit in his time to be that bothered.

  11. Liked it okay, not as much as the last one, rolled my eyes at a few bits, but the shaky-cam drove me up the wall. Had to narrow my eyes and squint during certain sequences rather than just closing them outright.

  12. Saw this in an empty matinee and I broadly agree with the general consensus. I like it, it’s not as good as the first one, I miss the messiness and weird cinematography, I love Iron Maiden ect. I don’t have a whole lot to add but I do have two thoughts. Firstly, I think part of what hurts it in comparison to the first movie is the first movie’s two part structure. It makes The Bone Temple feel like a smaller film. Secondly, especially compared to the second half of the first film, Spike isn’t really a character with agency, and no one in the Jimmy’s half of the film really takes up the mantle. Jimmy Ink probably could have filled that role but doesn’t quite land it. I think the driving thrust of Spike’s story being Ink and Kelson trying to protect him in their own way is fine, but it does feel like a step backwards from the second half of part one, where he takes on his father’s role from the first half.

    Still, a good time at the movies and I look forward to part three, and what I can only hope is its own weird subtitle.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>