A Better Tomorrow III

tn_bettertomorrow3After their disagreements over A BETTER TOMORROW 2, John Woo and Tsui Hark weren’t able to work together on part 3. But they both wanted to do a Vietnam war era prequel, so Woo took his and made it BULLET IN THE HEAD, Hark made A BETTER TOMORROW III: LOVE AND DEATH IN SAIGON. As far as artistic success I’d say Woo definitely won that battle, but at least Tsui got to clean up in the getting-to-hang-out-with-Chow-Yun-Fat department.

mp_bettertomorrow3A BETTER TOMORROW III (I would’ve called it AN OKAY YESTERDAY) takes place in 1974. Chow Yun Fat reprises his role of Mark, who really doesn’t look 12 years younger than in part 1 and surprisingly doesn’t ever mention that he has an awesome twin brother named Ken who lives in New York. I mean it really is a shame that they didn’t get to do some PARENT TRAP type split screen trickery in this one. If the Star Warses taught us anything about prequelizing it’s that every popular character from the original movies has to be extremely important in what happened earlier. So Ken should’ve been all over this thing.

I guess Chow Yun Fat hadn’t done HARD BOILED yet, if he had maybe they could’ve had him save a bunch of babies from a hospital and they grow up to be the kids who idolized Ken and worked at his restaurant in part 2.

Actually, Ho and Kit aren’t in this one either, it’s just about Mark and two new characters. I thought Mark was supposed to be kind of a bad dude before the events of part 1 but I guess not, he’s a nice guy and if I understand correctly this shows how he got involved with counterfeiting and what not. He’s trying to get his cousin and uncle out of Saigon and alot of the movie has to do with smuggling American currency across the border.

On his way to Saigon he tries to bribe a customs agent at the airport so he can get some money through, but right after taking his cash the guard is relieved by the guy on the next shift and Mark is fucked. The crazy thing is he would’ve made it through in time if he hadn’t noticed a lady (Anita Mui) drop her lipstick and pick it up for her. Not even something important, just the lipstick, and he got stuck still holding the cap.

Luckily she must’ve seen what happened and felt bad because she uses her connections to get him through. It turns out her name is Chow and she’s a gangster. Good person to know.

Mark finds his cousin Mun (Tony Leung), Mun falls for Chow and Chow falls for Mark, etc. But Chow’s got a possessive ex-boyfriend that’s a gangster too, he gets jealous and goes after Mark and it turns into a whole thing. Their battle goes on on both sides of the border.

You know, before you get all excited thinking it’s gonna be like this:


I should inform you that there is also a poster and DVD cover for it that looks like this:


I just thought everybody should be aware of those hats. The public has a right to know. Despite this last poster being sort of accurate I thought this movie was okay, it’s more melodrama and it does have some shootouts, including against military police with tanks. There’s alot of smoke machines with lights behind them. They’re pretty cool scenes, but definitely not up to John Woo standards, even though they do throw a dove into one shot, maybe as a joke. (I did have to see this on a pan and scan VHS with sometimes bad subtitles, so that makes it harder to make a fair comparison to the Woo movies, which I saw on decent widescreen DVDs.)

The action highlight is definitely when Mark drives a motorcycle dragging a crate full of explosives on a trail of barb wire and swings it into a tank to blow it up. Before that there’s a great scene where he gets into trouble with customs agents at the airport and decides to deal with it in not necessarily the sanest way: attacking the agent with a club. You gotta admire a guy who knowingly starts an uphill battle like that.

But Mark doesn’t start the movie as a guy who could pull moves like that. In this prequel we learn that his female friend Chow taught him everything he knows. There’s a montage where he tries to shoot a bunch of bottles and misses every single one. She takes the gun and quickly hits all of them with no effort – the idea I guess is that she teaches him how to do it. When he tries again though he misses so bad that he shoots a coconut drink out of Mun’s hand – man, I wouldn’t be laughing about that if I was Mun. But he seems to think it’s funny.

At this point Mark always has a cigarette hanging out of his mouth, not a match, and he dresses nice. But later in the movie Chow gives him his black duster as a gift from Vietnam, so it’s kind of like in the TEXAS CHAINSAW remake prequel when they explain that Leatherface found his chain saw sitting there when he got fired one day. Now when he busts it out in what’s supposed to be nearly two decades later in part 1 we understand the sentimental value of the coat, but they don’t say anything about why he chews a match stick. Maybe they were saving that for part 4. But if so they waited too long, if they made part 4 now it would have to be about Mark Jr. and he gets handed down the coat from Uncle Ken and he finds a note in the pocket that explains the matchstick.

By the way, it’s 50 minutes into the movie before they play that awesome theme song, but at least they play it. I’m not gonna complain. They’re just making us earn it. What the movie loses by being a prequel, I think, is that theme of killers and thieves trying to leave their criminal ways behind. It wouldn’t make sense for Mark to reform in a prequel. Without that element of the story it doesn’t really feel like a real BETTER TOMORROW to me. It’s more of a spin-off than an extension of that same story. What it gains, though, is a historical context that we haven’t seen a whole lot in the U.S. The Vietnam war to these characters is not so much a threat to their lives as a threat to their freedom if they get stuck at the wrong time on the wrong side of the border.

I have to admit though that I don’t feel like I have a frame of reference to understand all that. I’m sure there’s shit that’s meaningful to Chinese people but that goes right over my head. I think it was also trying to talk about current events through the context of the past, because Mark’s uncle keeps talking about the impending takeover of Hong Kong even though it’s not scheduled to go down for 25 years when the story takes place.

Mark is trying to hustle them out of the country as quick as possible, but his uncle gets mad because he wants to get all his photos and things. He says “You have no sentiment for the past!”, but it’s not really true because Mark takes a Polaroid to hold onto and he keeps the lipstick cap from when he first met Chow. I guess in part 1 he has a little more negative view of the past, at least judging from that monologue he tells about being forced to drink piss in Vietnam. That didn’t happen in this one (it got used in Woo’s BULLET IN THE HEAD instead) so I guess we have to assume that he went back to Vietnam again between the end of part 3 and the beginning of part 1 and had a terrible time.

Anyway it’s not hugely important to track down, but worth seeing for completists and scholars of the Mark & Ken’s Awesome Black Duster saga.



This entry was posted on Saturday, October 16th, 2010 at 6:11 pm and is filed under Action, Crime, Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

22 Responses to “A Better Tomorrow III”

  1. Thanks, Vern.

    The hat poster always made me think that here they are IN the better tomorrow, and it’s some sort of Sense and Sensibility type heaven, where there are no more shootouts and now just the romantic drama remains.

  2. At this risk of losing man points, Bullet In The Head has me in tears every time I watch it.

  3. I like quite a few of Tsui Hark’s movies. Do you have a review of Time and Tide on here? I realized a few films into my fandom though that they were spotty, so I usually wait for confirmation that one may be up to Double Team’s standards.

  4. no offense Vern, but I wish you would review more horror movies, it is October after all

  5. I mean you haven’t reviewed one since Demon Knight and that was almost a week ago

  6. And DEATH WEEKEND. But this completes the stuff I was watching the last week of September. It’ll be Halloween and LAWMAN episodes from here on out.

  7. oh, ok then

  8. ParkerPops…There is no shame in admittingthat. i cry all the time watching the ending of terminator 2!

  9. I tear up at the end of THE ROAD WARRIOR…

  10. I can still well up when Indy says sorry to Shortround for being an asshole in Temple of Doom.

  11. It’s funny that both John Woo and Tsui Hark’s first american movie starred Van Damme. Hard Target and Double Team.

  12. Two of Van Damme’s finest too.

  13. Vern- I thought you would have reviewed RED, too, seeing as it’s Bruce.

  14. Ya, I thought there’d be a Red review here this morning, too. How long can Vern resist Bruce?

    Ringo Lam’s first American movie (Maximum Risk) had Van Damme in it too. I think it was some sort of agreement Hollywood had with Hong Kong.

  15. another cool, somewhat obscure tsui hark movie is GREEN SNAKE. it’s kind of a mix between fantasy martial arts (wu xia) and romantic comedy, seriously. if memory serves, it’s about two snake spirit sisters. they normally exist as snakes but they decide to take human form so they can screw men. seriously. then they both fall for the same guy (a cop maybe? can’t quite remember). meanwhile, there is this bad-ass monk who has made it his mission in life to vanquish all animal spirits, so he is tracking down the snake sisters so he can battle them. when he runs, he runs really fast a few feet above the ground! it’s actually all pretty great, i recommend it. probably my favorite movie tsui hark directed that i’ve seen (yes, that includes ONCE UPON A TIME IN CHINA).

  16. It’s funny how they repeatedly painted themselves into a corner with this series by killing the coolest character in the first film, bringing him back as a twin in the second because he was so popular, then killing him again. I always wished they’d upped the absurdity in part 3 by having Mark die an epic, heroic death at the end of the prequel with no further explanation.

  17. I’m watching the pilot for Hawaii 5-0. It’s directed by Len Wiseman. The action sequences in this show are better than most big screen action films. Except Die Hard 4. You guys give this guy shit because he’s not a great writer or he listens to producers telling him not to show blood. But what you should be doing is hoping this guy gets a great script and makes the next great action movie. It’s gonna happen. OK, I’m completely over selling it. I just think he’s very good at direction action sequences.

  18. I don’t have the patience to wade through all the talkback comments from all three reviews to find out if somebody recommended the two GOD OF GAMBLER movies to you, Vern, but I’d be curious to hear what you thought of them. I haven’t seen them in years but I remember them being really weird examples of the ol’ “heroic bloodshed.” Also I’d love to someday read your reviews of other Chow Yun Fat classics like TIGER ON BEAT, PRISON ON FIRE, CITY ON FIRE, PEACE HOTEL (not really action but interesting), FULL CONTACT and ONCE A THIEF, his other movie with John Woo that has some weird shit in it (like the last scene where Chow throws a baby.)

  19. Stu: I don’t envy Vern having to write a review of RED. As far as I’m concerned, no other film this year better exemplifies the response “meh” than RED.

  20. Incidentally, it’s kind of ambiguous how many of the heroic trio die at the end of ABT2–but yeah, I figure they’re all likely to die from their wounds.

    (Sitting in those chairs looking like lords of destruction. {g})

  21. Vern, I’m surprised you didn’t mention that Mun’s father is Han (actor Kien Shih) from Enter the Dragon. Which of course begs the question; How come he didn’t die from the beating Bruce Lee gave him, and how the hell did he end up in Vietnam?

  22. I additionally believe that mesothelioma is a scarce form of cancers that is generally found in those people previously familiar with asbestos. Cancerous tissue form inside mesothelium, which is a protecting lining which covers many of the body’s bodily organs. These cells normally form within the lining in the lungs, abdomen, or the sac that really encircles the heart. Thanks for expressing your ideas.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>