"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Cronos

The last time I saw Guillermo del Toro’s debut CRONOS (1992) must’ve been more than thirty years ago. I know I was aware of it before he came out with MIMIC, but I can’t remember if I rented it before or after. So it would’ve been the late ‘90s or earlier. (Only ‘90s kids know CRONOS.)

It’s funny that there’s a movie I like about getting old and it has now gotten old along with me. Del Toro was still in his twenties, making a movie about old men trying to stop aging. I’m not grandpa-aged yet but I’m gonna say he guessed pretty good. At 50 I relate a little bit to this guy getting fucked up about age.

Of course one of the things that’s changed since 1992 is that del Toro has become an institution, a name brand, a celebrity, a best picture, director and animated feature winner. Back then was an obscure makeup artist and director of short films and television, making an impressive feature debut, but only released in 28 theaters in the U.S. When I think about it I could easily picture del Toro having some super low budget calling card movie, like an EL MARIACHI, an ERASERHEAD or an EVIL DEAD. Wouldn’t have to necessarilly start with ‘E,” but it would show the seeds of what he’d become while having its own crude beauty. No, this is more like BLOOD SIMPLE for the Coen Brothers – he seems almost fully formed. He’d quickly get more extravagant with the effects and the sets, but this doesn’t seem DIY in the slightest. It has scope to it, it has style, it has most of his obsessions. A dark-fairy-tale-meets-monster-movie tone, a mystical antique, a weird insect, an innocent little girl, a part for Ron Perlman. No Spanish Civil War yet, but the backstory does invoke the Inquisition.

The tone is set by the opening narration read by Jorge Martínez de Hoyos (THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN), at least in the original Spanish incarnation. For some reason the version I streamed on Home Box Office Maximum has narration in English, but I love how it sounds. It explains how a 16th century alchemist and “official watchmaker to the viceroy” (Mario Iván Martínez) created “an invention which would provide him with the key to eternal life.” The Cronos device is a gorgeously designed, palm-sized golden contraption, kinda like a Faberge egg. 400 years later “a man of strange skin the color of marble and moonlight” (same guy) was impaled to death in a building collapse. The contents of his mansion were auctioned, but “never on any list or inventory was the Cronos device mentioned,” and the camera (guided by cinematographer Guillermo Navarro one year before DESPERADO) shows us that it’s hidden inside an angel statue.

In 1996, Jesús Gris (Federico Luppi, PAN’S LABYRINTH) and his wife Mercedes (Margarita Isabel, LIKE WATER FOR CHOCOLATE) live a humble life raising their granddaughter Aurora (Tamara Shanath) and running a little antiques shop in Veracruz. Some strange people have been coming in, poking around, looking for something. When roaches crawl out of a hole in an angel statue, Jesús takes apart the hollow base and finds the device inside. When Angel de la Guardia (Ron Perlman, POLICE ACADEMY: MISSION TO MOSCOW) comes in the next day and buys the same statue with cash I’m not sure Jesús even realizes that was what he was looking for.

Angel’s uncle Dieter (Claudio Brook, THE EXTERMINATING ANGEL, LICENCE TO KILL, REVENGE) is a terminally ill factory owner who decoded the backwards Latin of the alchemist’s memoirs, saw sketches of the angel, and has had his goons scouring for it for who knows how long. (There are rows of them hanging in his residence.) So it’s a Holy Grail movie. But also a vampire movie.

Jesús doesn’t make the deliberate decision to use the device. It basically stings him. When he’s examining it, it sort of transforms from egg to scarab, its six metal legs popping out and digging into his hand, drawing blood. I love the interior shots of the device – elegantly clicking gears, like clockwork, but with a Cronenbergian, pulsating biological mass in the middle. Later we learn that “An insect is trapped in the device. It’s like a living filter.”

Out of embarrassment or secrecy, Jesús lies to his wife about the cause of his wounds, and hides his sudden symptoms: massive thirst, hunger for meat, torturous itching, heat, the twitches. He’s like an addict overnight. He lets it pierce him again and the next morning decides to shave his mustache to look more handsome. Starts acting cool. Unbuttoning his shirt a little. His wife is into it. This is the part that hits me different now. Yeah, I could still look pretty good, right? I don’t have to be an old man. Nobody has to know.

Of course it turns into a fight for the device. Angel trashes the place looking for it, he won’t give it to them, then finds out he doesn’t even have it because Aurora was worried about him and hid it from him. An intervention. But he gets it back and continues using it, which is great for him until he starts thirsting for blood. The only specific scene I remembered from seeing it before is still a highlight: at a New Year’s Eve party he sees a guy with a nosebleed, can’t keep himself from following him into the restroom, ends up on his knees licking a splatter of blood off of the floor. I can’t imagine many things more pathetic, but he does it so lustfully. It’s almost like a compulsive perversion more than a drug. And his family are left alone at midnight wondering where the fuck he is. That’s the sad part.

It shifts into a different horror gimmick after Angel drops him off a cliff and he pulls a Boone-in-NIGHTBREED, resurrecting and ditching the funeral home before the cremation. Del Toro finds some good dark humor in the art of preparing him for the casket, and Jesús ends up having to pull a shard of glass out of his foot to cut the stitches from his mouth. He returns home in a backwards burial suit that’s basically a bib with attached shirt and tie.

Here’s a cute twist on vampire lore: after he discovers that sunlight burns his skin he sleeps inside Aurora’s toy chest with her doll. There are no fangs or bat imagery though, and they leave out crosses and garlic and what not. And Daywalkers.

Although Perlman was well known from TV’s Beauty and the Beast, this was only his fifth film, after QUEST FOR FIRE, THE ICE PIRATES, THE NAME OF THE ROSE and SLEEPWALKERS. Of course it was the beginning of a long association with del Toro (I count seven movies they’ve done together so far ) and also it was kind of a precursor to CITY OF LOST CHILDREN, another cool international film where he’s the American actor. I like that he’s so very American yet fits organically into these international films. Who else would it be playing that character? Only Ron Perlman.

There’s a climactic fight with Angel on top of the de la Guardia building, under a light-up de la Guardia sign. I wonder if del Toro thought about the duel under the Silvercup sign in HIGHLANDER, another movie about extended life. Also I wonder if they ever considered a futuristic CRONOS II and a syndicated Cronos: The Series shot in Canada. Anyway I like that the sign has a clock on it. The thing de la Guardia is most afraid of.

Yeah, living forever would be a problem. It’s a simple tale of the dangers of greed, an obvious theme, but so true it feels kinda deep. I suppose it’s an upper middle class movie – Jesús owns a shop, he lives comfortably, no economic complaints. But de la Guardia is very representative of today’s billionaire asshole class, who feel entitled to live forever and take what they want from everyone else even though they have no joy or soul or love in their lives and would make the world better simply by leaping into any hole deep enough to never get out of. Even his nephew hates him and only tolerates him for the inheritance. Jesús loves people and is loved by them, he appreciates beauty and history, he isn’t a fucking asshole, so we side with him, even though neither of them should have this device or this extended life. It’s really a tragic circumstance. He would’ve been better off never knowing about that thing, and just letting the asshole have it. But these are the cards he was dealt and we hope for the best outcome still available.

I love this movie. Of course del Toro will always be a god for BLADE II, and I like all of the other ones too, but he started off so strong and then there was a stretch where I was starting to think I’d never love them as much as I wanted to. That’s changing. After NIGHTMARE ALLEY, PINOCCHIO and rewatching this, I’m back on the del Toro Express. Next stop FRANKENSTEIN. I’ll try to keep expectations realistic.


p.s. I totally forgot that the character of Tito the coroner played by Daniel Giménez Cacho returns in the otherwise unrelated WE ARE WHAT WE ARE (2010).

p.p.s. Technically this could be called holiday horror because it’s set at the end of December with some Christmas trees, at least one Christmas song, and an important New Year’s Eve party with countdown and everything.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 5th, 2025 at 1:12 pm and is filed under Reviews, Horror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

8 Responses to “Cronos”

  1. I remember recording this off late night TV in the early 2000s. When they showed it, I was on a weeklong schooltrip to Berlin (Wasn’t worth it) and I was so hyped for this movie, which was really hard to find over here, that I kept texting my sister to make sure the VCR is programmed, a tape is in it and it recorded it. Sadly it still cut off most of the prologue.

    But I had a great time with it! By the time I had already seen MIMIC and BLADE 2, so that was a nice introduction to del Toro’s arthouse horror side. Sadly I haven’t seen it since then. It’s still his most obscure movie over here. There must have been some rights problems or else I can imagine we would’ve gotten a ton of overpriced Mediabook releases by now. Not even sure if it ever came out on DVD.

  2. I saw this at a festival* in like ’94-’95, and don’t think I’ve ever seen it since. At the time:

    -I thought it was a nice little Hellraiser riff
    -Was weirded out that Ron Perlman seemed to randomly be in it as a heavy

    And that’s really all I had. While I could lie and say “I knew that I was looking upon the first feature of the mostest visionary flimmaker of a generation” or whatnot, I really didn’t and I won’t. I thought it was pretty good.

    *I think I may have seen Alex Cox’s Highway Patrolman at the same festival, and if I was to choose ‘Best Mexican DTV Movie’ of the fest, it would have been that one

  3. About 10 years ago the Criterion Collection boxed this up with Pan’s Labyrinth and The Devil’s Backbone in a nice Blu-Ray set with a book and whatnot. I only watched this one once, but I liked it. I don’t think a Del Toro movie has done it for me since Pan’s Labyrinth, but I like that he’s out there doing his thing.

  4. So I had to bypass this thread to carve in digital stone, to the only critic who might see what I saw in the same light…. In GDTs Frankenstein I am 99% certain Oscar Isaac is channeling Prince.

    The strut, the gloves, the louche headwear and next-levrl scarfing, the open shirts..his entire physicality is prime era Prince.

    Am I alone in this?

  5. That’s funny, I didn’t think about that, I was thinking of him as a ’60s rock star, but I totally see it now! I did note when Elizabeth told the creature to “Take Me With U.”

  6. Vern absolutely nails it — and in the behind-the-scenes doc (also on Netflix), GDT himself admits he wanted to dress Oscar Isaac like Mick Jagger. Mission accomplished.

    To me, Isaac was channeling some deranged, velvet-draped version of Diego De La Vega — and I was so here for it.

    But ye gods…

    GDT’s Frankenstein is a fever dream of Gothic grandeur — visually sumptuous, operatically tragic, gloriously gory, and achingly tender.

    With his signature baroque imagination cranked to eleven (and let’s be honest, isn’t every GDT film at its core a Gothic melodrama?), the film’s practical sets, lush lighting, and painterly cinematography deliver frame after frame of eye-melting beauty. I wasn’t watching — I was devouring it.

    The casting? Mostly sublime. Isaac and Elordi are magnetic as the Mad Creator and his Doomed Creation. Even Christoph Waltz shows up doing peak Waltzian menace — and I loved every second.

    Minor quibbles: a few liberties with the source material don’t quite stick the landing, and despite her perfectly spooky surname, Mia Goth feels oddly out of place in this lavishly Gothic world.

    But those are footnotes.

    This is filmmaking with a capital F — bold, bloody, and breathtaking.

  7. (sorry, more FRANKENSTEIN talk)

    I’m glad to see that I’m not the only one who thought Isaac crushes that performance. It seems like his very intentional mega-acting put a lot of people off, but heck, he’s playing Victor Fuckin’ Frankenstein, it’s his goddam duty to go big. And it’s a very rare mega-acting performance which hits those operatic highs while still keeping the character firmly anchored in a specific and comprehensible personality that doesn’t feel completely reductive, and that’s honestly pretty amazing. I have mixed feelings about the way del Toro uses the character (and particularly think that his all-consuming love for monsters really denudes The Creature of much of his danger and complexity) and some other quibbles about the last act, which seems bafflingly abbreviated (all that setup and then the actual conflict between Frankenstein and The Creature is confined to two brief scenes and the rest happens off-screen?!) but it’s been pretty depressing to me to see so many critics dumping on Isaac when this is A) the best role he’s had in years and he’s obviously having a ball with it and B) pretty obviously one of the best film versions of this character who so many adaptations tend to reduce to a mythic stereotype.

    It’s also, IMHO, del Toro’s first film in a long time that feels fundamentally solid, with him deciding in advance what he wants to do and not getting distracted from that goal. There are some shortcomings which hold it back for me but I also find the extremely lukewarm reaction it seems to have gotten to be pretty depressing. It’s a special film, rhapsodic and ambitious and unabashedly operatic, worth seeing in a theater lumps and all

  8. I was there before this got a full VHS release. We were on good terms with our video store owner, so they sometimes let us have the screeners they’d get. One of them was this, had a weird cover that made it look like an Evangelical movie. So watched it not knowing a single thing about it and loved it. Then his string of movies after, made him my favorite director for a little bit.

    Then he woke up one morning and decided he never wanted to make a good or even watchable movie again. Confounds me his mainstream star blew up at the same exact time he became lazy and sloppy and his movies barely watchable.

    But he was there for me when I needed him most in my life. That counts for something. And even if his movies are all terrible now, he’ll always have this banger of a debut, a fun cheesy monster movie, and the best Marvel movie by quite a few miles. Also two great ‘proper’ movies.

    Cronos, good movie is what I’m saying. Still unique after all these years.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>