"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Hellboy: The Crooked Man

If you knew there was a new Hellboy movie this year – the fourth live action one – chances are you weren’t thrilled about that fact. For most people, it seems, HELLBOY was two movies directed by Guillermo Del Toro and starring Ron Perlman and since those guys aren’t making a third one that’s it, end of story, no further questions your honor.

That was the response in 2019 when there was a third one made on not much more than half the budget of HELLBOY II: THE GOLDEN ARMY, with a different tone, directed by Neil Marshall and starring David Harbour as Hellboy. The makeup just isn’t as good, it’s jokier than I wanted, but hell, it won me over. It’s less reverent than the Del Toros, more in the style of 2000s CG-driven studio b-movies, and even has Milla Jovovich as the villain. In some ways I thought it was more in the spirit of the comics by Mike Mignola than the Del Toro movies were, though with a whole bunch of different stories crammed into one movie, so it feels pretty hectic.

Before greenlighting HELLBOY: THE CROOKED MAN they must’ve checked around and found out I was the only person who liked the 2019 one. So they started over with a new Hellboy (Jack Kesy, DARK WEB: CICADA 3301), a new director (Brian Taylor, MOM AND DAD), and less than half the budget of the previous lower budgeted one. In the U.S. it went straight to V.O.D. with an ugly poster and publicity stills that made it look like a fan film.

This week it came out on disc and I caught up with it. It definitely looks much cheaper than the others, and the Hellboy makeup especially can’t match how good Perlman looked. But like Harbour before him Kesy does a valiant job of making me like him anyway. I’m happy to say I kinda liked this one.

I’m not saying you will too. But maybe. I know how much some of the folks talk about “folk horror,” and that’s what this is – the Appalachian type. Hillbilly legends and folklore and shit. Set in 1959, out in some woods, people turning into animals, magic bones, a blind reverend, floating seductress witches, mountain spirits, snakes going down throats, “a big fucking bird,” you name it. Despite the CROOKED MAN’s obvious economic disadvantages it has one thing over the other ones, and that’s that it’s written by Mignola and his regular collaborator Christopher Golden (with director Taylor), adapted from one specific comics story. It’s probly the worst HELLBOY movie, but not for nothing it’s the one that’s most like the comics – small little isolated supernatural investigations, ghost stories, folk tales, nothing bombastic. Hellboy can travel around and meet people, they notice he’s a demon guy or whatever but they don’t got a problem with it. Some of them already heard about him. This guy they’re trying to help named Tom Ferrell (Jefferson White, EILEEN) says Hellboy can’t be the devil because he read in Life Magazine that he was found in a church, plus “I met that son of a bitch. He don’t look nothing like you.”

The Bureau of Paranormal Research and Development stumbles into this case by accident. Hellboy and his less field-experienced partner Bobbie Jo Song (Adeline Rudolph, who will play Kitana in MORTAL KOMBAT 2) are transporting a possessed spider that grows giant and escapes, wrecking the train they’re on. Hellboy says that something evil in the area caused it. He knows because “Dark things call to dark things,” so he heard it too.

They come across a cabin where a boy has been magically paralyzed. Just then Tom returns to the area after many years away, and starts telling them about how he and his childhood crush Cora Fisher (Hannah Margetson) and another lady named Effie Kolb (Leah McNamara, NAILS) dabbled in witchcraft, causing all kinds of problems.

One of the first scenes that really had me realizing I like this one is when Grammy Oakum (Suzanne Bertish, MAGIC MIKE’S LAST DANCE) looks right into the camera and explains how to make a “witch ball” out of various animals guts and baby’s nails, boiled in a pot and wrapped with “some hairs from your head and your nethers.” These witch balls come up a couple times. Mignola reads about alot of weird shit like this and puts all the best ones into his stories. I mean, even if you don’t believe in magic you don’t want somebody to throw a witch ball at you, in my opinion.

Effie is a good performance and character, a taunting cackler somewhat in an EVIL DEAD vein. But the main threat is the subtitular ghoul (Martin Bassindale, HERE), a creepy old man in a top hat with a bent neck courtesy of his death at the gallows. A good villain used with responsible moderation. As Tom tells it, he was “one of the first white men who came here from Europe hundreds of years ago,” he got rich playing both sides of the civil war, but “Heaven don’t have much room for rich folks,” so now he goes around claiming souls for the Devil, getting a penny for each one. “He gets enough of them, one day he’ll be rich again.”

Tom’s been running from the Crooked Man ever since a regrettable childhood ritual involving a cat skeleton. “You were just a kid. A deal with a demonic entity? How can that possibly be binding?” Bobbie Jo asks.

“Yeah, it’s kind of binding,” Hellboy says. But, “Look, there may be some wiggle room. It’s what I’m here for. To renegotiate.”

Tom finds out his dad (Anton Trendafilov, UNDISPUTED 3) is dead, and brings his body to Reverend Nathaniel Armstrong Watts (Joseph Marcell, THE EXORCISM OF GOD) to bury in consecrated ground at the church, which we’ll find out was built to plug a collapsed coal mine leading to Hell (see also THE CHURCH and DOMINION: PREQUEL TO THE EXORCIST). During the ensuing battle, the reverend will turn a cursed cat bone (long story) into a flaming holy weapon, use it to carve a glowing cross into the shovel he digs graves with, and give it to Hellboy to use as a weapon. I guess religion is kind of cool sometimes.

I really do like Kesy in the role, but I also kept thinking his eyes and nose were wrong for the part. Or at least the makeup failed to make them look right some of the time. It wasn’t a constant problem though, and he generally looks better in motion than in the stills you’ve seen (it took me a while to find the one to the right here, where I think he looks pretty cool). THE CROOKED MAN obviously lacks the lavish production value of the previous ones, but then again the story is designed for a lower budget. The CG effects are tasteful, it generally looks much better than that rough opening, there’s some good atmosphere to it, and Taylor and d.p. Ivan Vatsov (BOYKA: UNDISPUTED) come up with some interesting camera moves here and there without going spastic like Taylor would’ve in the CRANK days. The score by Sven Faulconer (SCREAM VI) is pretty good and I like the occasional use of blues and early rock ’n roll needle drops with lyrics about sinners and stuff.

Most of all I think this works for me because it’s a good script with lots of great dialogue about the weird shit that’s going on. Like when they go to Cora’s house and find her empty skin in a pile on the floor.

“What do you make of this?”

“She must be out roaming around. Just gotta wait for her to get back.”

Then a raccoon scratches at the window.

“That’ll be her demon familiar, I suspect.”

“I hate those.”

It’s such a nice blend of weird occult details and dry humor that I don’t know which one it is when Hellboy says, “The only way to tell how old a witch is, you gotta cut her leg off and count the rings.”

If you’re open minded and you’re ever in the mood for a down and dirty Hellboy tale in the tradition of the comics, where he travels and meets some people, stumbles into some crazy shit, makes some dry comments, says “aw, crap!” a couple times, gets thrown around by and punches a few monsters, I do recommend HELLBOY: THE CROOKED MAN for your specific circumstances. It worked for me.

In an ideal world this would’ve somehow made enough VOD cash to warrant a sequel with a slightly bigger budget. That ain’t happening, is my guess. But I won’t mind if we keep getting different cinematic Hellboys every several years. He’s gotta catch up to the Batmans and the James Bonds.

This entry was posted on Thursday, December 19th, 2024 at 11:09 am and is filed under Reviews, Comic strips/Super heroes, Horror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

21 Responses to “Hellboy: The Crooked Man”

  1. I haven’t seen this one yet, but I caught up with the Neil Marshall one this summer and I ended up liking it a lot actually. So, it’s at least a 2 man Hellboy 2019 fan club.

  2. You actually did a better job selling this to me than anybody else so far. Although if someone would’ve told me 10 years ago that Neill Marshall and one half of Neveldine/Taylor would make each one HELLBOY movie, I fully would’ve expected Marshall’s to be the low key folk horror one, while the other guy’s would be the hard R-rated where Professor Bruttenholm keeps dropping F-bombs.

  3. I also like the Marshall HELLBOY. The good parts of Del Toro’s are still good but people forget how much cutesy sitcom bullshit is cluttering up those movies. I, for one, was not clambering for a third one. Do we really want to see Hellboy changing diapers and acting like the clueless henpecked husband on a Tim Allen show? In my opinion a new direction was needed. The Marshall one ain’t great but its rock-n-roll raucousness was more my speed.

    You guys know I hate folk horror with the fury of a thousand suns, but I got a soft spot for weirdly specific arcane rituals. The witch balls sound like something out of a Chinese black magic movie, and I can get down with that.

  4. I didn’t mind the Neil Marshall HELLBOY but I fucking haaaaated THE GOLDEN ARMY, so I’m at least mildly interested in checking this one out.

  5. I also liked the Marshall/Harbour Hellboy. Like, significantly more than I recall liking the Del Toro/Perlman ones. Its meandering plot and side-quests and stuff was my favorite aspect, and felt very comic booky.

    Cautiously optimistic about this new one.

  6. I loved the Del Toro Hellboy’s, hated the Neil Marshall version (wanted to like it but it kept annoying me) and for me Crooked Man was a real return to form for the series. Unlike the Marshall film it seemed to have command of the tone it was aiming for (save for a slightly too action-packed end sequence) and kept interesting with the smaller details of character and atmosphere. If they make more Hellboy’s like this, I am happy to keep watching them. The character seems more suited to lower budget eccentricity, which is where Marshall film ran into trouble. Whenever it had anything interesting it had to end the sub-plot fast to get back to blockbuster action. Crooked man has a more confident balance.

  7. I… kind of hated it? Happy to see people are liking it though. It’s definitely a step in the right direction, there are some good bits, and it’s the first one of the movies that gets the tone of the comics right.
    It’s just that I felt the storytelling was a bit of a mess, the action was a disaster (ruining some scenes that had some really great ideas) and I seem to have very little patience for Taylor’s choices. The guy’s improved immeasurably since his CRANK days, and he does a good job here of limiting his excesses to things that fit in with the type of movie he’s making. But I still disliked pretty much every stylistic flourish in the film (and there are a few); They are completely extraneous, call attention to themselves, and look really amateurish, which is not a good combination.

    A shame, because despite everything I actually really liked it in its quieter first half, at least once the dogshit spectacle that is the train derailing and the first spider fight were over and done with; By the time they get to the cabin and have a nice civilized conversation while a guy spasms in the ground, witchstruck, it got me thinking hey, this is really good!
    But then the fight at the church hits, the film devolves into an endless series of fights, the multiple pots fizzle out unsatisfactorily, and… I was back to hating it. Maybe I should watch this again with lowered expectations.

  8. When you mentioned that the comic book has the “folksy” elements, I immediately thought how much it sounded like the wonderful “Nocturne” (and, by extension, the first “Blair Witch”, which was its quasi-sequel). The secret government agency to battle supernatural creatures, the agents, the rural locations, beliefs and spiritual customs from all over the world… and a red devil with big horns as an employee. That’s “Nocturne”! (Well, that, plus, of course, The Stranger and Swietłana).

    I now thought that those Hellboy comic books copied “Nocturne”… but apparently they came out earlier, so it seems that “Nocturne” may have actually copied them! It’s still excellent, however, and the copying seems fitting, in a way, considering that Nocturne’s (and the first Blair Witch’s) Swietłana was supposed to be given her own series, but eventually her character herself was copied and became the half-vampire Rayne of “BloodRayne” (and its atrocious sequel). Copies of copies of copies!

    I don’t know if I knew of the Hellboy comic books when playing “Nocturne” and “Blair Witch”; I know I gave them a brief look at some point, perhaps when the film came out, but found them too infantile and too ineptly drawn to move past several pages. As for the films, the first film was enjoyable – its best parts were the opening theme and that amusingly silly SS-Baraka-Ninja-Zombie character (Ruprecht Krönen? Why do I remember the name?) – the second one was mediocre, the third film I turned off after about two minutes, and this one… I didn’t even know it existed.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDXBGGuwB3w&t=710s

  9. I’ve intentionally removed myself from 99% of the internet and from having awareness of any and all current or upcoming events or news, out of mental self defense against the impending re-shittification of the country and elevation of trolls for the foreseeable future, so I once again had no idea this movie existed. But this sounds like what I have always wanted from a Hellboy movie since reading the first trade paperback collection of the comics in the 90s, in terms of the tone that was completely wrong in the otherwise enjoyable Del Toro versions. I have no problem with sub par CGI either, so I’m hoping this hits the mark for me. But I agree with the idea that Hellboy is MUCH more suited to a moody monster of the week X-Files episodic TV show instead of these overstuffed movies they keep doing. Hellboy is like a supernatural plumber, called in for small scale instances of folklore intruding on the modern world, and an excuse for showcasing the mood and miscellany of those campfire tales, not a super hero who needs to save the world. So frustrating to see these incarnations of the character miss that almost entirely, but I guess that’s Hollywood.

    As a comic book artist who studied under Kubert though, there’s no better way to torpedo your credibility and opinion on comic art or illustration than to call Mike Mignola’s art inept. Maybe it was Duncan Fegredo on an off day, but Mignola is a literal master of the form. There were rumors he had a studio hidden somewhere in the basement of the Kubert School (literally the old Dover High School, but the top floor and basement were sealed off and unused, though not impenetrably) so we were always poking around trying to see if he was down there lurking, like one of his good guy monster characters. Saw Andy and Adam more than once, but never saw Mignola.

  10. I knew they were making this. Had no idea it already came out let alone on VOD, and it’s kind of my thing to keep up with franchises.

    Maybe I’ll rent it over the holidays. Was it never intended to be theatrical? Is this a “keep the rights” situation?

  11. Yeah, good question. I mean, it’s honestly a good idea to make it a lower budget franchise, but you’re right, they might’ve done it for rights purposes.

  12. But like, Mignola wrote it. When it was in development I assumed it was still for theaters but you know what happens when you assume.

  13. I might remember it wrong, but I think it was indeed supposed to be a theatrical release and it raised a bunch of eyebrows when it was suddenly dumped to streaming. If it was the plan all along, they didn’t communicate it very well.

  14. It was released theatrically here in the UK in September, and there were trailers for it before other movies in the leadup to its release. Maybe they tested the waters and dumped it when it didn’t do well overseas? (I have no idea how these things work).

  15. So we’re now four films deep into the Hellboy-verse, and I still have the same nagging question

    The comics were very successful. And not because their tightly plotted tales (they often seemed like they were made up as they went along), ripping action (Hellboy shoots monster, or monster drops a boulder on Hellboy, then Hellboy shoots him…), or multi-dimensional characterizations (Hellboy wisecracks, says “crap” when boulder is dropped on him).
    The comics were very successful because they looked really, really, really cool.

    Yet, none of these movies make any attempt to emulate the most successful aspect of the comics.

    I mean, the Sin City comics are just people dying in horrible, painful ways. So Rodriguez could have just shot it like a Saw movie, but he understood that horrible, painful deaths weren’t the appeal.

  16. I do think it goes a bit further than that. The comics were successful because they were a hell (no pun intended) lot of fun and combined a lot of tones. They looked cool and dark and serious, but had a protagonist who looked like the devil, was destined to end the world one day, but had the “What’cha gonna do, it’s a living?” mentality of a plumber or “gumshoe who has seen it all”. He wasn’t Dr Strange who would hold a long speech or someone who would have to make many moral choices and live in a world of moral grey areas, he would shrug and punch a vampire centipede to safe the day.

    Plus the stories were a mix of light hearted fun that wasn’t trying to re-invent the wheel or tried to convince the readers that they are “for adults” with a million f-bombs, splash panels of graphic violence and tons of rape. They successfully used all your favourite pulp tropes and some at times incredibly well researched stories about monsters and mythologies from all over the world. (One story randomly mentions a talking mungo and outside of “mysterious phenomenons” magazine that I read as a kid, I had never heard anybody else mention that.)

    And yes, they looked cool.

    But saying that none of the movies did that, is plain wrong. I can fully imagine that del Toro probably had toyed with the idea of indeed shooting them in extreme shadow heavy black & white like the comics. But especially the first one makes a lot of good use of light and shadows. The 2nd is more bright and colourful but still is far from looking bad and at times oozes atmosphere. One of the cool things about del Toro is that he treats his popcorn pictures visually like his arthouse stuff. (Just look at BLADE 2! I mean, really look at it!)

    My point is: Reducing the success of the comics to “they looked cool” and at the same downplaying the visual style of at least half the movies by saying “They did not look like the comics”, is quite wrong, sorry.

  17. I don’t know, I can’t say that personally the first Hellboy movie looked all that different from Spawn or anything else Navarro shot up to that point.

    As for the rest, I guess you’re right, Mignola was never too highly regarded for his distinctive art style.

  18. “Mignola was never too highly regarded for his distinctive art style.”

    I honestly cannot tell if this is sarcasm or ignorance, no disrespect. Mignola made his entire career off of his “distinctive” style. Just before the Image boom of the early 90’s his work was getting crazy hard pushes from the Big Two. His pin-ups were everywhere, cover work everywhere, inkers were lining up to embellish his sturdy structures and clearly, art editors at the houses were enamored with his angular Alex Toth stripped-down funk. Jesus, I can think of at least one X-Force pin-up he did that almost completely validated the design excess because he strips it down to mood, shadow and silhouette. He’s a one of a kind artist. People will chase his style like a Buscema, a Lee or a Mobius forever.

    And, dude, his Bram Stoker’s Dracula adaptation is just the proverbial tits.

  19. In all fairness, through the years I heard from many people who didn’t like Mignola’s style because of his angular minimalism. But I guess that’s a problem that every artist with a very distinctive style has. Just look at Don Rosa, who stuffs an incredible amount of details and sight gags in every picture and way too many people are like “Fuck that guy, his stuff doesn’t look Disney enough”.

  20. Don’t get me started on how gutter people treat Sergio Aragones when it comes to “art”. I get it. You (some) think “realism” equals “great”.
    As a person who puts ink to page, I cannot stress how much harder minimalistic design is than maxed-out hatching lines. It’s a technique you only really learn by unlearning your own bravado and “look at me” tics, especially for an artist coming from that whole milieu. Hell, John Byrne couldn’t get anybody to care about his work at that time. Walt Simonson was slumming for Image.
    Mignola’s style is what kept him up there in the masses of vein popping muscles and back breaking breasts. The fact that he paired that unique look (that was as ripped off by other artists at least as much as Frank Miller’s Sin City ink-scapes) with truly entertaining and above all, INTERESTING storytelling isn’t something to be dismissed lightly.

  21. I definitely don’t agree that HELLBOY (or any movie I can think of) looks the same as SPAWN! That is one of the most distinctively ugly movies of its era.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>