"KEEP BUSTIN'."

Steven Seagal: Lawman Season 2 Episodes 7-8

tn_lawman4seagalogicalcatchupEpisode 2.7: “The Innocents”

This episode opens in the SUV with Colonel Fortunato getting a phone call. “Is that the narc call we’ve been expecting?” Seagal asks/expositions. They go to back up narcotics in stopping a vehicle they suspect of transporting large quantities of the wicked substances. As they watch the stop go down Seagal observes, “That’s strange, man. They got two women in the vehicle.”

It gets stranger, Chief. As the dope dog sniffs around you notice they got a baby in the car too. “Just ain’t right” Seagal says. This theme goes back to the previous episode, Seagal’s indignation at people putting children at risk by having them around criminal activity.

It turns out it’s just weed, but it’s huge bricks with the weight already Sharpied on them. They use Fortunato’s phone to add it up and if the measurements are correct (which I bet they are, if you’re responsible enough to label each package I’m sure you’re gonna get it right) it’s just under 100 pounds.

mp_lawman2There’s a young dude who takes responsibility for the whole thing. The girl is his sister and he claims she didn’t know the drugs were in the car. “I fucked up, man,” he says. But his admission doesn’t warm Seagal to him, he’s fuckin pissed that this guy got his sister and baby niece involved in a major crime. He actually tells him “I don’t give a fuck about you,” a rare abandonment of the I Need Time To Change principles.

At the end of the scene we found out that the sister was not charged, but their mother was, which I didn’t understand.

Back at Steven’s house we see him living an idealized New Orleans life, playing guitar on the porch, and the magic of editing (I think) implies that he’s looking out on a lake with an alligator in it. He tells Elle that he was invited to be grand marshal in the Krewe of Alla Mardis Gras parade. Don’t worry, it’s not one of those titties and Russian sex slaves kind of deals, this is the one in Jefferson Parish that’s for families and bead-haters. There’s a flashback to the first season children’s hospital episode as Seagal says he wants to bring some of the sick children to enjoy the parade with him. (They’re gonna be bummed when they find out which one it is, though.)

Friday night the Squad gets briefed for a “Narc Raid,” where once again we find a crying baby. There’s also a mom in the house who’s “very ill” and the daughter doesn’t want her to have a heart attack from all this commotion. The suspect is the man of the house, and the Squad lecture him about having all this weed around a baby. He says he locks it up, I guess believing that they’re worried his baby is gonna eat the weed or something. But they point out having that around could cause a break-in or something where the baby could get hurt. (I’d be more worried about Nic Cage’s BAD LIEUTENANT character busting in and shooting the baby.)

The dude says he has no choice, he has to sell weed because he lost his job and he has to support his family. Larry Dyess says, “You ain’t gettin no father of the year award for this, all right?”

Man, Larry gets all the best lines. That’s not as good as that one about the coconut, but it’s good. Seagal gets to lecture the guy though. He says “Well, if you got kids, what the fuck is wrong with you, man?” and “Get a new life, bro” and “To me it’s unconscionable.” Good word, could’ve been the episode title too. Or a movie where he plays the bad guy: STEVEN SEAGAL IS… UNCONSCIONABLE.

Besides addressing the children-in-danger theme this case is also notable for having a part where Seagal pulls out a big knife to flip over a bag of weed.

Their next call involves a “suspicious character slingin drugs in this area.” Seagal seems to kind of respect the operation around here, complimenting their “very, very good lookout system.” They find a bunch of young black men hanging around smoking in a parking lot and as they frisk and condescendingly question them one of the dudes says, “Steven Seagal, huh? When all this is over y’all don’t mind if I get his autograph, right?”

The sad thing about this scene is that it does turn out that these guys are totally innocent, and they’re completely blase about it. I mean, lately I been reading alot of people whine about having to get a pat down and (for god’s sake) having to briefly turn off their silly electronical doodads just for the mere right of being protected from terrorism and plane crashes when they fly on an airplane. Like, “This is America, I am white, and have never attended a rap concert before, how dare you give me a light pat down just because it is your job and responsibility to protect me and my fellow travellers!” Meanwhile here are some black youths not asking to be involved in air transport who have to get a much more invasive search and interrogation because they were in a parking lot. And they don’t seem offended at all.

But this leads to a historic LAWMAN moment, the first time when the starstruck individual demonstrates legitimate Seagalogical knowledge. Usually it’s “my auntie loves your movies!” or “my wife loves you!” or a sense that they sort of remember seeing his movies years ago. This guy not only starts listing which ones he owns, but he goes straight to the DTV Era. “I got BELLY OF THE BEAST, I got TICKER, uh, INTO THE SUN…”

Larry (only familiar with the Golden through Silver eras, I’ve noticed) says, “What about the classics? What about UNDER SIEGE?”

The guy says, “UNDER SIEGE, I got ABOVE THE LAW…”

“OUT FOR JUSTICE?”

“HARD TO KILL… I got alla that, man.”

Did you see that, though? He started with obscurities. One of the best and craziest of the DTV Era, then one of the shoddiest ones. And he ends with all the best of the filmography. He’s well-rounded.

There also turns out to be a mom with a young girl there, a toddler. She holds the girl up to see Seagal and says it’s the man from that movie EXIT WOUNDS. On one hand I’m kinda concerned if this little girl really is familiar with EXIT WOUNDS, on the other hand it’s only a movie. We know letting her watch Seagal have a blade fight with MJW is better than having her in the car during drug runs.

(And by the way if you’re thinking Seagal should do a TSA reality show in order to make the pat downs go over better with the public I’m sure they’ve considered it, but figured the autographs would cause too much flight delay)

Anyway, Seagal hugs the little EXIT WOUNDS fan, ’cause he loves the children. At the parade (which is not too heavily attended, looks like a typical small town parade) Seagal wears a big cowboy hat, and people in the crowd drink from plastic cups with his picture on them. Some guy in the crowd yells “I was arrested by Steve!” And the kids talk about Seagal and Elle being a cute couple.

Don’t you get it, man? The children are the innocents. Keep them away from the drugs, and in the parades and movie theaters.

* * *

Episode 2.8: “Under the Influence”

The final aired episode of Season 2 begins with Fortunato sneezing from a “nasty bug” that’s going around. But a case of the sniffles can’t keep him away from yet another narcotics briefing and raid. Finally we move away from the weed dealers and get to the hard drugs, a gal suspected of dealing coke out of her home.

At the briefing Seagal asks “How we gonna make entry?”

“We have the ram,” one officer says.

So you get to see a door get busted, but I guess they’re not fast enough. She apparently flushes her crack down the toilet. They figure that out because there’s a bunch of money floating in the toilet. She claims she dropped it. You know how that is.

Somebody has to pull all the money out as evidence, so you get to see how much it was. I don’t know if it’s the economy or what but it’s not as much as you might expect a crack dealer to have. There’s just one $100 bill, four twenties, one ten and two fives. (Not enough people use tens, by the way. I like tens, it’s a good denomination in my opinion.)

Despite her apparently lax business the lady is kinda lucky because all they find is some weed and one tiny crack rock. Coulda been much worse. Way to flush, lady.

I noticed the suspect was wearing a sweatshirt for a school called John McDonogh. I looked up the name and it turns out John McDonogh was an interesting figure in New Orleans history. He failed at a senate bid and at wooing some well known public figure lady, but he succeeded in business. Unfortunately he was a slave owner, and even though he did eventually free them he made them pay for it, so even then they had to keep working for years. On the other hand he did contribute to an organization that helped former slaves go to Liberia. I mean, maybe he did it for the wrong reasons, I don’t know. Most significantly for our purposes here he was very reclusive and miserly but when he died he willed his money to public schools for freed slaves and poor whites. And his family were pissed off like the family in GRAN TORINO. So there were 20 high schools in New Orleans named after him. Eventually they changed the names of most of them as part of a movement to stop having shit named after slave owners. But there are a couple left and I guess one of them must be real proud to have one of their alumni on the A&E Network claiming she accidentally dropped $200 in a toilet.

The next case involves a vacant lot that has caused numerous complaints of drug dealing and/or shady shit. I guess the guys were tired of being shown running around at their age so they brought a new team member named Marcus. He’s young and in shape so he hops a fence and a guy that sees him runs for it. When they all corner the suspect and pin him down he uses the ol’ “I ran because I didn’t know you were police” line. They’re annoyed by that so they end up being kind of degrading to him, they make him sit on a bucket.

To his credit though Seagal feels bad for the guy when they find out he’s had 12 felonies and 52 misdemeanors, making him a “big time code 6,” or habitual offender. “How you feelin? All right?” Seagal asks, and says he hopes they can get him help. (It looks bad at this point, though.)

To lighten the mood Seagal teases Lawrence about how he should’ve hopped the fence to come help.

Now poor Marcus is regretting going with the Squad because he picked up Fortunato’s nasty bug. Not only does he have to be sick but he has to have Seagal rub oils on his back to stimulate his lungs. I forget if it was Lawrence or Larry but somebody says “Put the witch doctor on him” and somebody else, “Here come the voodoo doctor, y’all.” Anyway Marcus claims it’s making him feel better after three and a half minutes of oiliness.

The next case is another sad one, some old dude in a straw hat driving drunk with no tire at all on the right rear wheel. He’s all confused about “Why my truck runnin so rough?” and can’t follow a pen for the field sobriety test because he’s got a glass eye. Seagal calls him “buddy” three times and one of his charges is for “improper equipment.”

The episode ends at the Accupuncture and Herbal Center, where Seagal helps choose some herbs to make into tea for the team to drink for soothing the effects of the nasty bug. There’s a dramatic musical buildup to Lawrence drinking his tea from a Hello Kitty cup. He doesn’t gag or anything, he’s fine, but afterwards they joke about having a bad reaction and having to go to an actual hospital.

This is an enjoyable episode, but sort of a poor choice for a series finale if that turns out to be what it is. (The A&E websight lists the swordsmanship episode “Blade Master” as the final episode numerically, which makes more sense although they aired it at the beginning of the season.)

* * *

SEASON 2 CONCLUSIONS

Season 2 of LAWMAN was enjoyable. It introduced a little more of Seagal’s home life and brought in his love of and skill with swords, which I always approve of. It put him in the action a little more, including numerous drug raids, and had more laughing and teasing between him and the other officers.

I can’t find any information about whether or not another season of LAWMAN is planned. He’s already filmed a new non-reality series and is still making movies, so it might be hard for him to get back to. On the other hand, he seems to enjoy it.

People often ask me if I’ll ever do an updated edition of my book Seagalogy. I don’t think it’s the time yet, but I do hope to do it some day down the line when Titan Books asks me to, or if that never happens then when the rights revert to me years from now. Whenever that is I don’t look forward to the challenge of figuring out how to cover his TV shows. I did a whole chapter on TICKER (where he’s not even the main character) so how much do I need for 8 hours of reality television?

More importantly, what am I gonna do with the Eras? He’s gonna keep doing direct-to-video movies for the foreseeable future, so should I just consider the DTV Era to go on forever?

Well, I have a new theory about that. Only time will tell if this pans out, but I think we’re in a new era that might be called the Experimental Era or the Dabbling Era or something like that. After an entire books-worth of movies built around a fairly consistent persona, in recent years Seagal has broken that pattern, he’s been messing around and trying new things. When the book ended he had just done URBAN JUSTICE and PISTOL WHIPPED, and I was convinced he was starting a comeback, at least quality-wise. Unfortunately since then I don’t think his movies have lived up to the promise of those two, and one of them (AGAINST THE DARK) is my current pick for his worst movie to date. So it doesn’t seem like his heart is in at as much as it was for a minute there.

But that’s just the DTV movies. On the other hand we have his really funny appearance in MACHETE, which was his first time on the big screen since HALF PAST DEAD in ’02 and his first time ever playing a villain. We have his sudden reinvention as a supposed-real-life cop, turned into two seasons of reality television, something that’s completely new for him. Next we’ll have at least one season of TRUE JUSTICE, his first non-reality show, also something new for him, especially if he’s more of a team leader character than the central character, which is the impression I get from the trailer that’s online somewhere. These new projects where he mixes it up seem to be where he puts his energy and enthusiasm, so that’s why I think testing new flavors may end up being the defining quality of this stage in his career. But we’ll see.

This entry was posted on Sunday, December 12th, 2010 at 7:24 pm and is filed under Crime, Documentary, Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

13 Responses to “Steven Seagal: Lawman Season 2 Episodes 7-8”

  1. I’ve heard that TRUE JUSTICE is being retooled in a way. The 12 Episode are going to be repackaged as 6 DTV Movies instead.

  2. Maybe Rodriguez will continue to take a pet interest in Seagal and write another great character for him to play? It happened with Mickey Rourke…

  3. When are you going to review TEKKEN, Vern?

  4. Patrick Newman – maybe I’m being incredibly stupid here, but what “great character” did Mickey Rourke play for Rodriguez? He (Rodriguez) didn’t have anything to do with “The Wrestler”, did he? I didn’t think they’d even worked together since “Sin City”, and that was six years ago.

    I’m lukewarm on Seagal since “Machete”. (Although, frankly, with the exception of Jeff Fahey, all of the actors playing the villains of that movie were wasted.) I’ve not watched any of my new DVDs since “Kill Switch”. (This is the problem with starting with the bad ones and working back to the good ones.)

  5. Paul- He means about Rourke playing Marv in Sin City. Rourke actually worked with Rodriguez before that in a smaller role for Once Upon a Time In Mexico. Though Rodriguez didn’t really “write” Marv for him, given it was a heavily faithfull adaptation, but he insist to Frank Miller that Rourke was perfect for the role.

  6. Thanks, Stu. That was the intention. I should’ve been more specific about Marv, though…you’re right when you say that the character is really Miller’s creation.

  7. Reading about guys getting locked up for weed always makes me angry. What a fucking waste. Even 100 pounds of weed – fuck, man, that’s the issue that demands major police action? And not to judge, but come on. You think Seagal’s never smoked a little pot (or worse)? He’s a musicians and a famous actor, if he hasn’t smoked it you can bet he knows a whole lot of people who have. I realize pot is a big money maker for the horrific drug lords in South and Central America, but arresting some poor guy with his mom and sister in the car isn’t doing much to hurt those guys or to help anyone on this side of the border either. It’s just a waste of time, money, and life.

    I know cops just have to enforce the laws made by politicians and demanded by voters, but it still annoys me — the whole system is pretty depressing.

  8. Mr. S – Didn’t California knock down petty pot posseision to a glorified traffic ticket, or am I mistaken?

  9. RRA — yeah, and a few places in the US have done the same, but in most places it remains a huge source of incarcertations and police spending. Also remember that while state law may de facto legalize it, federal law (especially the DEA) continues to be aggressively anti -marijuana.

  10. Mr. S – and as a result, the bad guys the dealers the cartels win. Besides sucking up valuable police resources, pot is easy soft cash revenue for those fuckers. Gravy on top of it all.

    Really, people DON’T FUCKING LEARN.

    What took down the booze-fueled mob syndicates of the 1920s wasn’t more cops or more guns or SWAT teams or harsher jailterms. Nope, they got their legs cut out from under them by Prohibition repeal. That’s what destroyed them.

    Or Kevin Costner throwing some asshole off the roof of a building, that might have helped too.

  11. MENDOZA: My friends, tonight we unveil my most diabolical creation: Swank. Ten times more addictive than marijuana.
    GUESTS: Ooh!
    MENDOZA: To human misery!

  12. Vern: since you’re pondering a method of subcatagorizing the DTV era, I thought I’d throw in something I noticed. The beginning of his DTV era is comprised of six films which all have one thing in common – Seagal plays a cultural outsider attempting to infiltrate a criminal subculture in each one, starting, appropriately enough, with THE FOREIGNER and continuing all the way to INTO THE SUN (including, surprisingly, CLEMENTINE).

    INTO THE SUN makes an excellent transition to the next era, because it’s a foreigner-themed film but also introduces the concept of Seagal leading a team or partnership, which will continue through the completely awful run of SUBMERGED-FLIGHT OF FURY and resurface occasionally after that (in his LAWMAN series, and most notably AGAINST THE DARK. Arguably, this Seagalogical trend began all the way back with EXECUTIVE DECISION but didn’t really become a full theme until this era).

    So, FOREIGNER – INTO THE SUN: ”Foreigner” DTV sub-era, where Seagal plays a cultural outsider in every film.

    SUMBERGED – FLIGHT OF FURY: ”Teamwork” DTV sub-era, where Seagal demonstrates his leadership stature by working with a team of other professionals, rather than as a lone wolf. This, uh, is also where is just seems like Seagal isn’t even trying to make a real movie most of the time. Teamwork has always been part of Seagal’s MO (for instance, he assembles a team in MARKED FOR DEATH and has a partner in GLIMMER MAN) but in this era it tends to define the way the films play a little more. The obvious exception is TODAY YOU DIE which has a more classic partnership, but given its context I think we can count it.

    URBAN JUSTICE – BORN TO RAISE HELL (”Lone Wolf” sub-era, where Seagal returns to his roots in domestic American thrillers where he alone can set things right. Given the span of the previous two era, which tend to be international intrigue films with a team-leader framework, one might assume that those two eras are a reaction to American foreign policy adventurism, while his reverting to a domestic single-protagnist format may reflect an increasingly weariness with the complexities of overseas entanglements and intellegence/covert ops solutions.

    Of course, you’ve also got ONION MOVIE, AGAINST THE DARK, and MACHETE in there, which are bizarre enough to not quite be quite catagorizable. Arguably this supports Vern’s “Reinvention” period, except that the other films in this sub-era are so strikingly similar in their formula. Perhaps the next few years will help to identify what exactly this era of Seagalogy represents.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>