Up

tn_upWelcome to another episode of Vern’s Soft Side. In this episode, Vern cries at a fuckin cartoon.

Okay, short version first: just go see the fuckin thing. This review is gonna have spoilers in the sense that I’m gonna talk it up, you’re gonna go in expecting this or that based on what I said, it’s gonna get to your analytical mind and might fuck everything up. So don’t read this. Also disregard what I said above about crying, I would never cry, come on man let’s be serious here.

UP is the latest Pixar and somehow tops everything they’ve done before. For all the mediocrity and horribleness going on in our world today, we are lucky to live in the golden age of Pixar. Who knows how long their streak could last, but watching their movies now feels like watching PINOCCHIO and BAMBI and all those coming from the same group of people in a row. It’s just incredible, nobody else can match what they’re doing.

mp_upThere’s this cliche about movies like SHREK and all the different comedy cartoons that have come since Robin Williams did the Arsenio Hall impression in ALADDIN. They say those are good cartoons because they work on two levels: for the kids it’s a cartoon that moves around in front of them, for the adults there is sophisticated humor such as a reference to a TV show that you know about, and that’s why it’s funny, you have seen that show before or know people who have seen it and told you what it was one time.

Well, UP blows that shit out of the water by really truly hitting at what kids want and what adults want at the same time, and not by appealing to the lowest common denominator or the easiest jokes. No, this is a fantasy adventure comedy with some great action sequences, some colorful creatures, easily the most laughs of any Pixar movie and yet also it hits on profound emotional life issues much more effectively than most serious adult dramas and what not.

Also it’s Pixar’s version of GRAN TORINO: grouchy old man loses his wife, stubbornly stays in his old house in a rapidly changing neighborhood, reluctantly befriends young Asian neighbor, they help each other to learn life lessons. There is less shooting and racism, though, and more flying.

Hopefully you’ve already seen it so I’m not gonna give anything away, but holy shit, I was crying in the first ten minutes of this god damn movie. I was crying before it even truly got sad. In the dialogue-free montage through decades of Karl and Ellie’s life together you see so much happiness, so much struggle, so much dreaming and almost but not quite achieving. And more than almost any movie it seems to capture the feeling of a real loving relationship and because time is moving so fast it becomes sad because you know at this rate their life together is fleeting. It hits you because you’re sad for what happens to these fictional characters, but also because it makes you think about your own life and where you are on achieving your dreams or finding happiness, about whether you have enough time or if you fucked up and got too off course.

In this one sequence it tells you in images so much about the way people want to do things with their lives, but don’t always get to. About how important that dream is not only to the person but to the person who loves them. You see how Karl wants more than anything to see Ellie get what she wants. You see how they fall into a routine and time passes and they fear that maybe they haven’t really done what they wanted to with their time together, that they’ve wasted their lives and lost sight of what was once important to them, and maybe still should be, but they don’t really know.

It has so many deeply relatable things for adults that I end up with tears rolling down my cheek like I got pepper sprayed. I look to my left, the gal next to me is worse than me. To my right I hear somebody blowing snot. Then somewhere to the left. The kids are all laughing at the jokes and the adults are all crying. So fuck you SHREK and your “ha ha, the donkey said a line from the theme song from THE BEVERLY HILLBILLIES, they threw that one in for the adults.”

I mean this is the most emotional thing I have seen in a cartoon so far that does not involve the bombing of Hiroshima. If the first ten minutes of UP was Andrew “Dice” Clay it would say, “Jesse the Cowgirl montage in TOY STORY 2? I fucked it.”

It really does work on multiple levels at the same time. Like the early scenes where construction is going on around his house. In the story it’s an excuse for why he has to fly away with his house. But emotionally it’s about the feeling of getting older and the world changing around you and stubbornly wanting to stand your ground. Or toward the end when he dumps all the furniture and things out of his house. Story-wise of course he has to make the house lighter in order for it to fly. But an adult can’t help but also see that he’s casting off all the shit he’s accumulated over the years. Earlier all that stuff was important to him because it reminded him of his wife, but now he realizes it’s just stuff, it’s not the objects that are important but the actual experiences.

(dude, Fight Club.)

You know what? I bet this is the first time in cinematic history that a 3-D movie makes people cry. I mean there might’ve been some teary-eyed emotional moments in JAWS 3-D or COMIN’ AT YA, but not full on tears. This brings up alot of questions about the technology, is it a problem to have salty deposits on the lenses, does it break the illusion for somebody to have to take off the glasses to wipe away their eyes, etc.

(By the way, the 3-D looks great and brings you even more into the detailed Pixar world, but I don’t think it’s necessary. If you don’t have one of those theaters near you or don’t want to spend the extra couple bucks don’t worry about it, see the movie in regular-D.)

I said, and still believe, that WALL-E is a masterpiece. Its one flaw is that the first section is such a perfect, jawdropping and completely unique masterwork of filmatic imagery that the rest of the movie, by being merely superb, is kind of a letdown to some people. This one does not have that minor structural problem. It’s front-loaded with that emotion but it’s perfect because then you know why this matters. It makes a dude pulling a house across a cliff seem like the most important thing in the world, because we have watched his whole life before that and we know what it means to him. You laugh and have a fun time with his relationship with his young neighbor Russell (as well as a dog and a bird) and some crazy death defying shenanigans and what not, but it’s all anchored in this ritualistic quest to fulfill his wife’s dream for her posthumously. It’s about his relationship with his dead wife. I thought I was fine with that, I thought I was a man again, then that last image snuck up on me and got me crying like a bitch again. So perfect.

Pixar, I don’t know if you guys have seen TYSON or not. But maybe it’s time to hang it up. I don’t see how you can top this one. In conclusion, Pixar, did it ever occur to you that maybe some people want to retain their emotional fluids, and not have them just leak out in public? Thumbs down.mp_up2

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (34 votes, average: 4.97 out of 5)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • RSS
  • PDF
  • Print

Tags:

47 Responses to “Up”

  1. hamslime

    I used to always cry after watching The Blue Lagoon. I haven’t seen that movie since I was about four or five so I can’t recall what about it made me cry. I think a baby dies or something. I should pick it up to see if it has the same affect on me now.

    May 31st, 2009 at 2:17 am

  2. CJ Holden

    I even cry everytime I see Galaxy Quest, when Alan Rickman says “By Grabthar’s hammer” to his biggest fan. (Don’t wanna say too much and spoil it for those who haven’t seen it. Those who have seen it, know which scene I’m talking about.)
    But I never cried during the Cowgirl montage in Toy Story 2. It’s a touching moment, but the horrible song that they play in this moment is very distracting.

    May 31st, 2009 at 2:57 am

  3. CallMeKermiT

    I cried with E.T. , when I was 4 years old. I was too young to understand that , but now that I’m older i think I appreciate more the emotional spectrum that the best movies are able to transmit . And I’m not talking about the excitement of watching “Hard Boiled” , and don’t get me started on the “BooH!!!” moments of what passes for “horror” this days. I love movies that are able to put me in a particular mood or emotional state. For example , the unnerving and tense last scene of “There will be blood”.I was literally grasping my throat watching the last minutes of that movie.

    Also : Vern , if you want to watch a kick-ass adult cartoon , watch “Ghost in the shell” and “Jin Roh: The Wolf Brigade” by Mamoru Oshii . And I really mean kick-ass , but also with brains and something to say. You will not be disappointed .

    May 31st, 2009 at 3:18 am

  4. caruso_stalker217

    First time I cried as an adult was during BENJAMIN BUTTON. Luckily I was alone, but I may never live it down. I was considering going to see UP, but now I don’t know. I fear my emotions.

    May 31st, 2009 at 3:23 am

  5. Andy C.

    Great review, Vern.

    May 31st, 2009 at 3:31 am

  6. O Goncho

    I was about to not read the rest of your review, but then I remembered UP isn’t out in the UK until fucking OCTOBER!

    Fuck that shit, Vern. Just fuck it, alright? I’m reading your damn review.

    May 31st, 2009 at 5:57 am

  7. pheteesh

    I cried while reading this review. Damn you Vern. I have a reputation to protect.

    May 31st, 2009 at 6:01 am

  8. Brendan

    Fantastic stuff Vern, as always. Now, the only way to regain your Fightclubness is to review Drag Me to Hell in an essay that also examines it as it relates to every other movie in the Sam Raimi ouvre. Please.
    I used to always be emotional during movies, it was always a problem for me, wanting to maintain the image of a brutal tough guy and what not. It doesn’t happen as much anymore, only on really special occasions. The last chunk of Return of the King with Frodo and Sam on the mountain usually gets the room really dusty at some point, pretty much every time I watch it.

    May 31st, 2009 at 7:24 am

  9. O Goncho

    Don’t worry about the tears, Vern. At least it sounds like UP really does open on a heart-breaker. I cried during the first ten minutes of fucking Star Trek! I’m gonna be UP’s bitch.

    May 31st, 2009 at 8:06 am

  10. Wickedeve

    Like pheteesh, I’m here dabbing at my eyes, just during the review. I can *never* see a Pixar movie in the theater because when I cry in a movie, I CRY. That’s because I’m sitting there holding it all in going, “Don’t cry. Breathe. There… DON’T CRY–” And I lose it.

    Yes, I was a mess during the cowgirl doll sequence, too. Someone at Pixar sure knows which buttons to push.

    May 31st, 2009 at 10:15 am

  11. O Goncho

    Man, if Vern wasn’t calling his badass outlaw status into question with this review, you can bet all our estrogen-high comments have really given any casual visitors reason to be skeptical.

    Sorry, dude. I feel just awful about this. :’(

    May 31st, 2009 at 10:21 am

  12. Danny

    Seriously fuck this movie for being so awesome. The scene where he finally looks through her book brought out the inner twelve year old girl, I felt like my girlfriend the first time she watched “the Notebook”.
    Great review though Vern, nailed it right on the head. I literally do feel lucky to be living through the golden age of Pixar. The only letdown of the entire experience was the Toy Story 3 preview. The preview itself was exceptional, but I feel like we’ve been on such an amazing ride with Pixar producing original characters and stories the last few years that I want them to keep opening up new worlds for me, not returning to old (albeit amazing) worlds.

    May 31st, 2009 at 11:41 am

  13. Stu

    My feelings about Pixar are a bit conflicted, though it’s really more to do with the larger perspective about animation in the west than them specifically. On the one hand, I do recognise how great the ideas and stories Pixar does are and how it’s making animation more than just some silly little kids thing, but on the other hand, I sorta resent it because Pixar and Dreamworks and the like are basically the only game in town and they all do generally the same sort of thing with All-Ages fantastical type things. Compared with anime, the scope is rather limited, and I’m specifically talking about BADASS cinema. Where’re the western animation equivalents of Ninja Scroll or Afro Samurai (japanese creator/studio/source material)? We can’t really consider stuff like Beowulf to count because it’s much rarer and always comes out with a PG-13 rating at most, so it’s all sort of restrained. The closest thing to Badass Pixar have made was The Incredibles, which managed the drama and heart really well while also providing lots of actiony superhero goodness too. John Carter of Mars might top that however, though I’m not clear on how much of that movie is animated because it’s meant to have some live-action element. Maybe it’s not really Pixar’s business to be Badass, but since they and the other family-aimed 3D animation companies are mostly the ones who get their projects put out, it does leave the other genres in animation a bit lacking this side of the world.

    June 1st, 2009 at 3:30 am

  14. CallMeKermiT

    Stu : I agree. I’d like to see more animated movies made outside the ” All Family” standard in America and Europe. I also prefer the hand drawn look of the classic cartoons to the all CG style , and I like the more adult oriented movies from Japan. Take a look at “Appleseed” from Masamune Shirow : I prefer the 1988 version , to the 2004 all CG movie. Both are pretty fucking badass , but I like more the 1988 classic animation style. Others badass cartoons from Japan ? Obviously AKIRA , but for me also “Venus Wars” , “Baoh” and “AD Police Files”.

    June 1st, 2009 at 8:51 am

  15. Stuntcock Mike

    Last time I cried was Marley and Me a month ago.

    June 1st, 2009 at 10:37 am

  16. Vern

    I don’t think it’s Pixar’s obligation to get into action and robots and shit. These are nerds in Hawaain shirts who worked at Disneyland as teenagers. Now they are part of the Disney family. I think it is respectable for them to be reviving the spirit of Walt Disney that was mostly dead in the Disney company for years.

    I mean yes, somebody should be doing other things with animation but Pixar happens to be great at making movies for people of all ages, so there’s nothing wrong with that. I think if Jim Henson had lived he would’ve been doing different things but I don’t necessarily want to see him making adult puppetry. These don’t seem to me like artists who are being constrained into a box, I think their passion and talent lies in these types of stories.

    If anything put that on Dreamworks’s shoulders. They’re the also rans in the Pixar business so they’re the ones that oughta find new territory that maybe they’d be the best at.

    June 1st, 2009 at 12:32 pm

  17. Mr. Subtlety

    I would like to point out that one of the things which makes “Up” really amazing is the rather unusual device of giving the full back story up front. There seems to be a trend these days to start the story cold and fill in back story with a flashback in the third act. People tend to think this will grab audience’s attention better because it sets up the mystery of “why are people doing this?”

    Up turns that on its head by telling you exactly who Carl Fredricken is right up front. This means that you have to trust the audience to care about a character, not a hook. And it pays off here, big time, because everyone after that works so organically. You already know what defined Carl’s life, and it saturates everything else that happens in the movie. That way, there’s no cheesy monologue at the end where he explains what this means to him. In fact, there are just a few small references to his back story spoken aloud any time in the movie. Just seeing him gently put his hand on a mailbox is enough to bring back the full weight of his life. Its so gracefully and confidently executed that its stunning — hard to believe, even while watching it.

    Also, for what its worth, it removes any necessity for a big speechmaking moment with Charles Muntz either. The parallels between his quest and Carl’s are obvious, and don’t need to be spelled out. But it would be so easy to underestimate an audience and just have them shout out their reasons for dong what they’re doing at the end. Its so standard in films, even good films, you almost don’t question it anymore. To resist the urge to spell it out… to resist making it explicit… thats some damn fine filmatism.

    And yeah, I cried.

    June 1st, 2009 at 12:50 pm

  18. dan

    “If the first ten minutes of UP was Andrew “Dice” Clay it would say, “Jesse the Cowgirl montage in TOY STORY 2? I fucked it.””

    …aaaaaand I’m sold.

    June 1st, 2009 at 2:05 pm

  19. Stu

    We don’t really need Jim Henson to be alive to see how he’d handle adult puppetry.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfaPOcuwB6c

    June 1st, 2009 at 2:05 pm

  20. Stu

    Ah crap, forgot to ask. I read there’s a talking dog in this, Vern. Do they do it in a way that’s bearable and un-Dreamworksy?

    June 1st, 2009 at 2:07 pm

  21. dan

    “… is to review Drag Me to Hell…”

    I’ve gotta agree with Brendon on this one. It was an excellent horror movie. I bet you’d like it.

    June 1st, 2009 at 2:12 pm

  22. Vern

    Stu, yes, they absolutely have a great way of doing it, it is a highlight.

    Brendon/Dan, yes, I will have a review of DRAG ME TO HELL soon. So everybody go see it so we can have an Oprah’s book club type discussion.

    June 1st, 2009 at 2:51 pm

  23. Chris

    I cried when I saw Terminator 2 and Ahnuld was dropped into the molten metal, and was all like I know why people cry. And I was all like meeee tooooooooo!

    June 1st, 2009 at 2:54 pm

  24. Timmy

    I cried at “My Girl” when Culkin gets killed by bees. Also an episode of “My Pet Monster” when I was really little. Things that have “My” in the title make me cry. I think that last thing that made me cry was that episode of “Deadwood” where Al watches the priest go crazy.

    June 1st, 2009 at 3:26 pm

  25. RRA

    Man, I was so emotionally unprepared for when the old man finally looks at that back section of the scrap book.

    June 1st, 2009 at 3:36 pm

  26. BARRASSO

    I went with a buddy and he thought it sucked, I stared at him like a dog shown a card trick. If you don’t like this what the hell do you want in a movie?

    June 1st, 2009 at 3:49 pm

  27. BARRASSO

    He would have liked a sequel to The Incredibles more, I don’t think he gets it.

    June 1st, 2009 at 3:54 pm

  28. jasonv

    i agree — i cried. opening hour was awesome. ending villain battle was a letdown though. they up-ended the conventions of animated stories so brilliantly that the shovel-load of convention at the end disappointed me. and that’s where my son started to get antsy, and bored.

    June 1st, 2009 at 4:27 pm

  29. Geoffreyjar

    I can’t believe you all have fell for this and Pixar’s other failures!! You think these are good movies?! Renoir! Goddard!

    read the truth!
    http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=70797

    Now now don’t worry I’m not one of those ‘he disagreed with me so he sucks!’ guys (if so then I would never forgive vern for liking Charlie’s Angels 1 & 2, but since I’m not a close-minded ass I’m cool with it)

    That said I’m a Pixar fanboy and I enjoy intelligent debate and getting different takes on things and since I agree with vern a very large portion of the time and you guys read him as well I figured maybe it would be interesting to post this here, if not I will learn my lesson and not attempt this again.

    Yes the guy (from the link) is an uber film snob but still do any of you guys think he may have a point. That we merely overpraise Pixar because their competition (minus Studio Ghibli) is such shit and that they are no better than other mass-produced mainstream entertainment and that we are merely giving them a slide because it’s animation?

    June 1st, 2009 at 10:51 pm

  30. Geoffreyjar

    oh yeah I did cry manly tears (that is to say I cried like an infant) twice in this in thing.

    Bastards got me last year with WALL-E too & with that Jessie’s song sequence.

    June 1st, 2009 at 11:01 pm

  31. Vern

    Thanks for the link. I don’t think he has a good point though. I do not think I or most people are giving the Pixar movies extra leeway because they’re animated and there are other animated movies that are shitty. He talks about parts of these movies that he admits are “achingly gorgeous,” “completely brilliant in every conceivable way,” “in the pantheon of cinematic greatness,” yet he still has to dismiss them as “for the masses” because he doesn’t like that they have action scenes and jokes in them. It seems like his problem is that these are mainstream movies that are amazing, and he can’t deny that they are amazing, and is ashamed to admit that he in fact loves a mainstream movie “for the masses.”

    How can you really say that people are cutting WALL-E extra slack for being animated, when everything they love about that movie could not have possible been done in any other medium? Isn’t it a nonsensical argument?

    He basically is saying yes, Pixar are incredible, but I will turn my nose up to them until they stop making Pixar movies. I think he also shows his true colors by claiming the shorts are more artistically successful than the features. Sure, they’re good, but I don’t think they hold up to his over-critical standars. He’s just trying to show off there.

    The one comment on the article put it best: “Grump.”

    June 2nd, 2009 at 12:41 am

  32. pheteesh

    The guy from the link sounds like a pixar fanboy from the 80ś who is upset that his favourite studio has achieved mainstream acceptance. He doesn´t provide any real evidence to back up his claims.

    And he is wrong to say that Pixar´s films are only compared to other animated films. Is there any other studio (animation or otherwise) that consistently values story and characters over the usual hollywood nonesense? I would say that Pixar is actually under rated because their films are animated.

    His questioning of the flying house shows that he missed the whole point of the movie. Each to his own I guess.

    June 2nd, 2009 at 1:18 am

  33. keepcoolbutcare

    Anyone else get a “Raising Arizona” vibe during certain parts of the opening flashback? Not only does Ellie look a bit like Holly Hunter (she also looks like Elastigirl, voiced by Holly Hunter) but the added whammy of the Fredricksen’s child bearing dilemma (I couldn’t not think of “her insides were a rocky place where my seed could find no purchase”) flashed me back to RA in a big way.

    I was a bit bothered by the fact that adoption was never an option – I mean, I understand, it wouldn’t have fit in with the larger story, but still, it irks me that it was just glossed over. Those two would’ve made wonderful adopted ‘rents.

    My only queef with Pixar is of gender/racial lines – sure, some of the films features a strong female lead (Elastigirl, again. Blast ‘em before they ask any questions EVE in Wall-E. Boo, but she only articulates one word and while being utterly adorable, she’s more of a prop/plot point) but they’ve never done a flat out female protagonist in a film yet, have they? Sure, Studio Ghibli got that shit locked down, and one can always turn to the old school Disney stuff, but it’s something that’s vexed me for a while now.
    Ditto major roles for African-Americans, Frozone being the lone exception that comes to mind.
    Do they as a studio have to “integrate” more (no, of course not), would it make the films better (depends on the story), is it a question that has any relevance in this day and age (maybe)?

    About Up in particular I kinda disagree a bit, in that I think after the first 10minutes the pic could only go down in terms of quality (like “Wall-E”); but hotdamn, what a ten minutes. Here’s something that got me thinking a bit though – all the previews, even at a 9:15pm on a Sunday night were for other “kids” films; ICE AGE 3d, The Princess and the Frog, some Bruckheimermayhem involving sassy, asskicking guinea pigs (W3 minus everything that made W3 heartbreaking). Now, my first thought I leaned over to whisper into my special lady friend’s ear was why don’t studios try to attach trailers to prints depending on the showtime – so goofy kids flick trailers for the early shows, more adult fare for the later shows, until it hit both of us…motherfuckers in out theater, at our showtime, were into that stuff, big time. But while I didn’t guffaw or even chuckle at those slapsticky, pratfalls aplenty previews, my favorite parts of UP (aside from the opening memory montage) were the slapsticky, pratfalls aplenty gags. Shoot, it could’ve been Kevin imitating Carl for 90minutes and I would’ve left just as happy.
    Where was I…oh, yeah, to anyone who has seen the other companies product and Pixar’s, is there a discernible difference in the gags? Like, do Pixar writers/animators write better pratfalls? Or is it just ‘cuz Pixar nails their fucking characters, makes you care for them, makes them utterly fucking believable, thus making de funny schtuff so much funnier? Before I got lost in circular stoner logic I was going to tie this into “Terminator Salvation” and why after the 1st two amazing action-set pieces the film just didn’t work – ‘cuz I couldn’t give a flying fuck fig about the characters anymore (particularly after Moonblood Good flashed a disgustingly perfect set of blazing ivory teeth – where the fuck that bitch gonna get tooth whitener in a desolate post-apocalyptic wasteland? And she’s, what, 25…when the fuck did she have time to learn how to fly in the first place? And then more ridiculously plot holes started seeping into my porous brain, making the rest of the flick an utter bore).

    June 2nd, 2009 at 5:05 am

  34. Geoffreyjar

    As I said the guy is a snob. Unless it’s an independently-produced foreign art house flick (even then if your name isn’t Renoir, Truffaut, Goddard, Einstein, Kubrick, etc.) then you shouldn’t even be allowed to touch a camera. (aka your average Criterion Collection customer)

    Oh well to each their own (though I must admit they do tend to get under my skin from time to time, I’d much rather put up with “Joe Six Pack” (who y’know enjoys movies) than put up it the snobs.

    That said I agree with the above poster who says Pixar is under rated. I work with primarily old people and they know me as the movie buff so they ask me what’s good that’s out (like they’ll be interested or agree but oh well) I told them Up would be right up their alley because I think it works alot better for older audiences than younger ones and they make no time in sticking their noses up and deeming it a mere kids film because it is animation. If it were live action then they’d be all over it.

    Hell if they weren’t mere cartoons I could probably have a discussion about the themes presented in Ratatouille & Incredibles but can’t because right when you suggest that they give you a stupid look because ‘it’s just a stupid cartoon for kids’. (heck they do that with mainstream movies as well, I remember trying to discuss themes brought up in the X-men trilogy to someone and they gave me look and pretty much told me ‘it’s just a stupid mainstream action picture’ (paraphrase of coarse)

    But yeah it disheartens me a little because I know most of my co-workers would dig Up but will not even give it a chance (or even take it seriously even if they do see it) because it’s ‘just a stupid kids movie’

    -they will go on and tell me how the latest celebrity-filled shitfest Dreamworks Animation is though

    June 2nd, 2009 at 8:54 am

  35. Chris H.

    I love (some) Pixar movies, but I don’t think it’s possible to call them underrated. “Up” has a Rotten Tomatoes scores of 98%. I remember when “Toy Story 1″ came out the first review I read of it (probably in the Washington Post) called it the best children’s movie since “The Wizard of Oz.” They’re good, very good, but not underrated.

    June 2nd, 2009 at 11:49 am

  36. Griff

    this movie made me want to cry too, but I actually tried not to because of the 3D glasses!

    June 2nd, 2009 at 9:23 pm

  37. Geoffreyjar

    Yeah underrated wasn’t the right word (sorry about that)

    More me being a nerd feeling sad that ‘norms’ (as my friend calls them) don’t or wont appreciate cinema the same way we do. (thus why we are nerds and they are not)

    So yeah wrong use of words

    sorry about that guys

    June 2nd, 2009 at 9:27 pm

  38. Francis

    Man, I had to wait to read this review until I finally got around to seeing the movie. Yeah, I cried too. Anyways, I just wanted to tell Stu that he should check out the trailer for this animated movie called 9 coming out in September. I don’t know if it’ll be any good, but that trailer is certainly badass.

    June 5th, 2009 at 10:16 pm

  39. aaron w

    i just saw it… it was probably my favorite movie of the summer so far, with DRAG a close second.
    i think you guys are right in saying that pixar nails it’s characters, and that’s one of the things that sets their movies apart. i think you have to acknowledge their impeccable comic timing. watching UP, i felt like i was watching something that was close to perfection. the “squirrel” joke is an example of that. it’s unexpected but isn’t out of place. then they repeat it in an escalated setting that makes it even better, finally bringing it back at the climax. pete doctor said in an interview that when they were conceptualizing the plot, they went at it as if it was a silent film. i think it’s that craft that sets them apart.
    sorry, i’m ranting.

    June 6th, 2009 at 5:19 am

  40. Ahnmin Lee

    Couldn’t have said it better myself, Vern.

    June 19th, 2009 at 10:28 pm

  41. M. Casey

    I finally got to see this before it left the theaters. I liked it, but not as much as WALL-E.

    Was it me or was the advertising for this movie really good? It didn’t tell you too much about the actual plot. I knew it was about a crotchety old guy, a balloon house, and the kid, but the dog, bird, and villain were welcome surprises.

    You ever have a friend who gets reallly bothered by little plot holes and story inconsistencies? I know a guy like that. He started to hate THE LAST CRUSADE because of the French knight at the end who, despite being trapped in the grail cavern for 1,000 years, speaks perfect modern English. My usual response to him is “MOVIE MAGIC!” because there’s just a certain amount of silliness you’re going to have to accept if you’re going to enjoy movies.

    But I was actually turning into that guy during UP. There were a few things that really took me out of the story; I wish they didn’t, and I don’t usually care about this stuff, but this time I did.

    –I can buy the floating house. But how does it ever catch up to the propelled zeppelin?
    –I don’t mind the talking dogs. But how does a man out in the middle of nowhere build these amazing collars, having been out of civilization for 70 years and presumably with no knowledge of anything past vacuum tubes?
    –Speaking of which, how old is Munz anyway? If we’re charitable and say that Carl saw the opening newsreel when he was about 8, and Munz was 20, that still makes Munz an absolute minimum of 90 years old. And while I know of a few sprightly old men, even into their 80s, by 90 things are really slowing down. The guy should basically be in a wheelchair (or much more likely dead). Carl should’ve kicked his ass no problem.

    And even re-reading what I just wrote it seems trivial, but damn it, it got on my nerves enough to turn this movie from a near-masterpiece to just “really good.”

    Three points I teared up:
    –once during the end of the opening short (guess I’m a sucker for these “kind friendship” stories)
    –once during the Ellie montage, like everyone else did
    –once during the scene near the end where the house slips under the clouds as Carl makes peace with it being gone from his life

    (Nice callback to your Ford Fairlane review btw)

    July 22nd, 2009 at 4:49 pm

  42. rainman

    Just saw this yesterday. I was kind of bored. Sorry.

    I did laugh pretty hard when the kid squeeked across the zeppelin’s windshield for 15 seconds. And the flashback sequence combined with the scrapbook at the end was very touching. And Carl giving the kid the merit badge. There was also one really neat 10-second scene when the house first takes off – there’s some random little girl playing in her room and suddenly the house passes by her window and it turns her entire room into a kaliedescope as the sunlight passes through the balloons. Beautiful.

    But for me the movie really dragged once they got to Venezuela. The talking dog collar bit was completely ruined by the previews and commercials (yeah yeah”squirrel!” funny stuff but when you’ve seen it 20 times already….). I didn’t really give a crap about the bird, or the entire subplot with the Alpha dog, or the old explorer dude (who must have been 100 years old by then, wtf?).

    Perhaps part of the problem was that I had just watched THE INCREDIBLES (my new g/f has a kid, whatcha gonna do) and I thought it was quite a bit better on most accounts. Blasphemy, I know.

    December 7th, 2009 at 7:51 pm

  43. Jess

    Up rocks! All of Pixar’s movies and short films rock! Everything Pixar-related rocks! I’ll never understand why Pixar is so freakin’ underrated, though; I mean, Pixar’s never failed ONCE, and yet they don’t get the recognition they deserve. And plus, there are a lot of retarded people (such as Armond White) who diss them. For what? For making the best movies ever?! Come on! Pixar kicks everyone’s @$$! You’ve got to be the dumbest retard on earth to talk trash about Pixar. Back on topic, Up is one of Pixar’s best movies – it made me laugh, cry, and it teaches a wonderful and possitve message. Rock on, Pixar! F U, Pixar-haters!

    December 19th, 2009 at 9:55 pm

  44. Vern

    Armond White can’t control himself. If it seems like everybody is gonna like something, he will hate it. I guarantee you if Pixar ever makes an obviously terrible one he’ll be ready to declare it their first masterpiece.

    December 20th, 2009 at 3:36 am

  45. ChopperSullivan

    I saw on Jim Emerson’s Scanners blog on the Ebert site that he listed Armond White as one of the critics of PRECIOUS. Armond White listed several pro African American pictures that were better than PRECIOUS. One of them was NORBIT. Armond White loses (PRECIOUS still sounds terrible.)

    December 20th, 2009 at 4:19 am

  46. Brendan

    God damn, I didn’t think it would be THAT good. Dear lord this movi is amazing.

    December 27th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

Leave a Reply