"CATCH YOU FUCKERS AT A BAD TIME?"

Honey Don’t!

HONEY DON’T! is Margaret Qualley lesbian crime comedy #2 from Ethan Coen and his wife/editor Tricia Cooke. When the first one, DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS came out last year we learned that 1) though only Coen is credited as director he considers it a directing team 2) don’t worry, she’s a lesbian (they have an unusual marriage) 3) they can make a really funny movie even if it’s not as slick as FARGO and shit.

It took me a couple weeks to get to this one, and the reviews I saw were dire, but I figured I’d still get some laughs from it. Instead I came out honestly confused what those people were talking about. It’s not just not as bad as they say, it’s straight up a good movie. To my surprise it’s more serious than the last one, still funny and absurd but an actual neo-noir/pulp/crime type deal, like a detective novel my cool building manager two apartments ago would’ve left in the free book box in the laundry room. It has fewer big laughs than DOLLS, but by design, and I think it’s much better directed – nicer looking, more seamless in its storytelling, more interesting balance of tone. I’d have to guess that what people are rejecting is not some messiness or failure but just the shaggy quality of this style of crime story where a bunch of stuff happens by accident or coincidence and nobody fully figures out what’s going on or achieves what they’re trying to (which is, of course, part of its world view and one of the main things that’s fun about it).

Like many detective stories (and other genres) a big part of the appeal here is just how cool this character is. Qualley (THE NICE GUYS)’s Honey O’Donahue is a witty, sexually forward lesbian p.i., her accent seemingly of another era, her outfits and “click clackin heels” standing out at crime scenes and the strip mall where she has her office. She hates guns (but knows how to shoot them), has a cool assistant named Spider (Gabby Beans, THE HARBINGER) who seems to need more job duties, and she’s the cool aunt to a gaggle of uncontrollable kids including teenage Corinne (Talia Ryder, WEST SIDE STORY), who comes to her for help. Everyone should have a tough lesbian aunt to save them from their abusive boyfriend and working the drive-thru at Weiner Heaven. Literally and figuratively, I want to say.

Corrine goes missing in what seems like a side plot at first but is the main thing Honey cares about. Before that she’s looking into the supposed car accident death of a not-quite client (a woman who had called her, but she doesn’t know why). We know it’s connected to a sleazy church called the Four-Way Temple, who we also know are trafficking unspecified drugs – the supply is repeatedly referred to in one scene as the church’s “matter,” because Coen always knows how to choose the funniest and unlikeliest words for any situation.

Chris Evans (KNIVES OUT, THE GRAY MAN) continues his funny bad guy streak as cult leader and regional crime boss Reverend Drew Devlin, who preaches between two giant portraits of himself (one with sunglasses), has a weird vendetta against macaroni for “just sitting there,” and convinces female congregants (often in pairs) that having sex with him is part of God’s plan. Evans’ southern-ish accent isn’t the most convincing, but he’s great at being the arrogant boss getting more and more condescending to his goons (all fairly likable) as things get increasingly out of hand.

Meanwhile Honey starts dating MG Falcone (Wow Platinum and EMILY THE CRIMINAL herself Aubrey Plaza), a cop who works the evidence desk. I thought their meeting at a bar had the most overflowing sexual tension possible until I realized what was actually going on (spoiler) (fingering). I hope those people who complain about movies being too chaste these days are appreciating Cooke’s addition of girl-on-girl lust and casual sex toy usage to the Coen canon. I love the part where Honey casually cleans her beads and dildos in the sink and puts them on the dish rack.

Man, this movie opens perfectly for my tastes – not with any jokes, but a quiet scene with a mysterious and fashionable French lady (Lera Abova, ANNA) calmly attending to the fatal car crash before taking a skinny dip and driving away on her scooter, just one of the many intriguing characters populating the movie. Then there’s a really outstanding credits sequence set to a Brittany Howard cover of a song I won’t name because I enjoyed realizing what it was saying about the Bakersfield, California scenery. An opening that fires us in to bounce like a pinball through the many colorful lanes and bumpers of the story.

In the tradition of Murder, She Wrote or some shit I wondered how Honey could run a private detective business in such a barren town, but then there turns out to be a hell of a body count within a few days, most of the people connected but their deaths happening by random fuckup. There is some cartoonish violence but not in a detached sort of way – there is some upsetting death both of innocents and of characters I would’ve been happy to see more of. And there’s something serious going on at the middle of this – the primary theme is women surviving abuse, bonding over their similar traumas, but also clashing over how to deal with it. There’s not a clear answer. When Honey’s estranged father (Kale Browne, BLOODFIST IV, HALF PAST DEAD 2) wants back in her life he’s alternately scary and pathetic. There’s definitely stuff to chew on there, I’m not sure what to make of it yet.

Just one more small thing I’ll mention is how much I like when Honey stops by a little bar, empty because it’s still the afternoon, and she banters with Lena Hall (THE GRADUATES), who’s playing bluesy piano the whole time, creating atmosphere, scoring her own scene. (Qualley also sings three songs on the soundtrack, which is produced by her husband Jack Antonoff.) I thought that lady Elle was the bartender until Don Swayze (DEATH RING) came out to talk to Honey and make me think god damn, have we been undervaluing Don Swayze? I hope he becomes a Coen regular. (Speaking of that, Bill Camp has a really good voice cameo.)

I think HONEY DON’T! is very cinematic, but I also found myself kinda wishing it was a show just so I’d get to see Honey and Spider on another mystery. And we’d have more of Marty Metakawich (Charlie Day, PACIFIC RIM), the homicide detective who apparently doesn’t understand that Honey isn’t joking every time she has to tell him “I like girls,” and her sister Heidi (Kristen Connolly, THE CABIN IN THE WOODS) and all the nieces and nephews, and hopefully Don Swayze and his piano bar.

I guess I shouldn’t care if other people appreciate this or not, but I want to note that it’s a pretty standard occurrence for Coen movies to initially befuddle people. I remember even the first time I saw THE BIG LEBOWSKI I thought it was good not great. Then I kept thinking about it and saw it three more times before it left theaters. I’m not saying HONEY DON’T! is THE BIG LEBOWSKI (though it did remind me of it in some ways). I don’t think many people will watch it a thousand times, it’s meant to be a trifle, a casual little pulp tale with some absurdity and funny dialogue. And it’s a good one of those. I’m pretty its reputation will turn around sooner rather than later, and if not at least I’ll be rewatching it on occasion and grumbling about it.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 16th, 2025 at 7:32 am and is filed under Reviews, Comedy/Laffs, Crime. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

6 Responses to “Honey Don’t!”

  1. It is true. Every Coen Bros movie is better the 2nd time around, even if you already loved it the first time. Also THE BIG LEBOWSKI was seen as a huge misstep by most people when it came out and see how that turned out.

  2. As someone who has been watching Coen Brothers movies in the theatre since RAISING ARIZONA it’s safe to say they’re an integral part of my ‘film’ life. It’s amazing the number of their films that made no real impression on filmgoers (and even a lot of critics) upon first release and then grow in stature over the years. Although FARGO was critically recognized immediately, what I remember is sitting in a theatre watching the movie on opening weekend twice – once at the Friday afternoon matinee first show and a second time at a Sunday matinee and I was the only person there. I was flabbergasted that no one else was watching this film. A friend working at the theatre said that the busiest viewing was the 9PM Friday showing, and that was still about a dozen tickets sold! In my mind as filmmakers they’re in the top 5 filmmakers/directors of the last 40 years. It’s crazy the brilliance on display from their first film. For me it was MILLERS CROSSING, their third movie that really blew me away, the brilliance of the look and design, the absolutely pitch perfect direction (emulating and satirizing 30s/40s crime movies and noir at the same time) and the goddamn brilliant dialogue, expertly replicating both the hardboiled outlook and aesthetic while simultaneously parodying it through invented wordplay was really something. I guess the nice thing was that up to O BROTHER, WHERE ART THOUGH they were never much of a mainstream success, and really until NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN they were not recognized as being critically acclaimed masters by even a lot of critics, so it felt like a cool club to be in when you met another insider who ‘got them.’

    A long way around to getting to: I enjoyed the hell out of this, I liked Drive-Away Dolls pretty well, but this is a much better film, more assured and slicker, but still pretty shaggy haired and silly. The way I look at it, both of the Coen boys have entered the stage of a career where they can screw around doing whatever they want and I’m happy to see the results. And Margaret Qualley is really growing into a spectacularly good actress.

    I’ve always thought of the Coen Brothers as operating in three different ‘modes.’

    1. – The populist entertainers – O BROTHER, RAISING ARIZONA, HAIL CAESAR!

    2. – The serious cinema – NO COUNTRY, TRUE GRIT, TRAGEDY OF MACBETH, BARTON FINK.

    3. – The ‘pure’ Brothers (the films that most accurately reflect their true artistic angle, the deliberately oddballs) – MILLERS CROSSING, HUDSUCKER PROXY, BURN AFTER READING, A SERIOUS MAN.

    So, for instance a lot of people might love O BROTHER, but they might not necessarily enjoy BURN AFTER READING. Any of these are great, even classic movies – again FARGO can make a claim as best American movie of the last three decades – I think it’s toss up between FARGO or UNFORGIVEN or MUNICH. While my preferences typically land with group 3, I love nearly all their films.

    They made one of the very best films of the 1980s – BLOOD SIMPLE.

    And the 1990s – FARGO.

    And the 2000s – NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN

    And the 2010s – INSIDE LLEWYN DAVIS

    and you could argue they made another movie in each decade that could be considered a very best:

    1980s – RAISING ARIZONA (maybe the best script in a comedy that decade)

    1990s – MILLERS CROSSING

    2000s – A SERIOUS MAN

    2010s – TRUE GRIT

    That is a serious filmography. And apparently their re-teaming for a new film, along gestating horror movie.

  3. I loved Margaret Qualley in this, and loved Honey as a protagonist but …yeah, no I didn’t get on with the film. Two people arrived 20 minutes into the movie and as they sat down I realised that they hadn’t *really* missed a whole lot in that 20 minutes that was vital to understanding things going forward.

    Then it actually really engaged me – the whole cast was doing great work, there were some really good lines, some really great scenes – and then something happens that put me in mind of that Simpsons island / Lord of the Flies episode that ends with the voiceover “And eventually they were rescued by, oh… let’s say Moe.” Not to mention in doing this thing it also falls flat on its face into some tropes I thought had been left 20 years in the dust.

    And then the last few minutes were fun again! I’d buy it *very* cheap on blu-ray to watch Qualley’s work again, I hope to see masses of Honey O’Donahue fanfic online. But I also firmly believe if a new screenwriter tried to sell this exact script with this story they’d be kicked out of the room *so* fast

  4. I was extremely relieved to find this was way better than DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS, which I found pretty close to out-and-out unwatchable. Much more finely-crafted and interesting, lots of solid character actors* in featured roles, loved the opening credits. And the best thing about it is probably the thing that’s inspired the most ire: the way that all its various plot threads feel like they should cohere (even Honey finds herself feeling the inexorable plot pressure to infer that they all come together) but then they never do. Pretty funny that after all these years, people still somehow think that the co-creator of THE BIG LEBOWSKI, NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, and BURN AFTER READING somehow wrote all these noir tropes that inexplicably peter out by mistake, like he and Cooke just never read the final draft or something?

    Anyway, all that’s well and good, but unfortunately although I enjoyed the vibe here I never found it very funny (I think I laughed exactly twice, once at the bumper sticker bit and once at Charlie Day’s blissfully cheerful reading of one of his last lines) and I’m sorry to say that I really stumbled over two key performances here.

    First, I think Chris Evans is pretty dang awful, mugging like 90’s Jim Carrey without ever for a second being either funny or scary, when the part should ideally be both. Instead he’s just exhausting and annoying. Frankly I sort of doubt Coen and Cooke have spent enough time listening to this sort of charismatic evangelical preacher character to understand how to properly parody him, and I found the result excruciating to sit through, not to mention just kind of dull. He does indirectly kill a few people but even if (generously) the point is supposed to be that he’s more a pathetic loser than a Machiavellian arch-villain, he just doesn’t really do enough to justify the amount of time we spend with him. And that results in more damage than a tedious subplot; for a movie which is theoretically about the damage done by Abusive And Selfish Men, it’s a pretty big problem that this dude –who in theory exists entirely to embody the selfish male id scooping up vulnerable people (and especially women) to use and discard– seems like such small potatoes. In fact, the movie is weirdly squeamish about actually depicting any of that; even when we see him banging his [presumable?] congregants, they seem pretty OK with it, and the movie treats it as a joke. We never see him manipulating or coercing anyone, and by the end we’re told (SPOILER) that, in fact, he didn’t even kill the one woman we assumed he did. All of which feels like a strange kind of bunt on some pretty serious material.

    But really, I could live with all that if I was in love with Margaret Qualley the way everyone else is and (especially Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke are). Alas, although I appreciate her fearlessness and she’s obviously really working hard here… I can always see her working hard. At no point am I able to see beyond the actress giving the performance, and consequently the film is never about Honey O’Donahue, Private Eye — it’s about Margaret Qualley, actor, acting like Honey O’Donahue, Private Eye. And if I don’t believe in this character, I can never really believe in the film. And it’s pretty jarring: after 40 years and 18 films of the Brothers Coen making movies together, I think I’d just gotten used to every single performance in every single one of their movies being perfectly calibrated (even in the bad ones, the performances are uniformly exactly where they need to be), so seeing a film with so much of their sensibility resting on two so completely miscalculated (or overcalculated) performances feels particularly destabilizing.

    Anyway, glad this exists, and it’s definitely better than its rap, and at 89 minutes you can’t accuse it of wasting your time. But it still feels more like an interesting failure than a success.

    * Nice to see Charlie Day finally get a movie role that effectively takes advantage of his unique screen persona

  5. I think Joel must have been the one with the talent because Jeeezus. These two fucking movies. This is better than Dolls which I thought was just awful, but this one…I guess a full half of the running time is just random shit after seeing the dumb and pointless solution to the mystery. Good acting, I really love Qualley in everything, and some really funny scenes/bits. But overall, not good.

  6. I thought this was fine, better than DOLLS, though I maybe found the titular dolls to be more endearing as characters. I’m kind of miffed that a movie with this premise, cast, director, tone, and runtime is not my favorite movie of the year, but such is life. There is a good movie in here somewhere, about women navigating misogyny, or falling victim to it. But the Chris Evans half of the movie is way too shaggy for me, a dead-end plot that feels like spaghetti (or macaroni) thrown at the wall. I was definitely into Honey’s half, though, even if it looks down on bus riders. Would buy yellowed pulp paperbacks of further Honey adventures.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>