So once again we have survived.

Silent Night, Deadly Night and Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2

Well the Christmas season is upon us and what better way to celebrate Christmas than to put ornaments on a tree and put presents under it? I don’t know but while we ponder that let’s also talk about evil Santa movies.

Silent Night Deadly Night is a mid-level entry in the holiday-themed slasher movie genre. It’s not a classic like Halloween but then again it’s not completely retarded like the Leprechaun pictures or Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Massacre which is not a real movie but would probaly be pretty stupid, in my opinion. Unless they got the right director but even then, I don’t know about that premise.

Silent Night, Deadly NightBasically what the movie is about is, they wanted to make a movie about a killer dressed as Santa Claus, so they went back and figured out all the psychological traumas that might lead to such a scenario. So they show how this kid named Billy is told by his crazy grandpa that Santa Claus punishes kids who aren’t good all year, and then right after that he sees his parents raped and killed by a criminal dressed as Santa, and then he goes to an orphanage where an abusive nun further instills the dogma of punishment and sexual repression into him, and then he gets pressured into being Santa for a toy store and gets drunk at the office party and rejected by a girl and next thing you know he’s go around with a fake beard and an axe yelling “punish” and impaling Linnea Quigley on a pair of antlers.

The movie gets less creepy and more ridiculous as it goes along. My favorite scene is when young Billy, forced by mother superior to sit on Santa’s lap, punches St. Nick out. Santa goes flying out of his chair along with the classic sound effect used when Poncharella or Hunter or somebody punches somebody out. Then Santa gets up, blood all over his fake beard, and yells “What the hell is wrong with that kid?”

Some day I hope they will put these movies on DVD and do a double feature of parts 1 and 2. This would be redundant because most of part 1 is actually included in the body of part 2. The story follows Billy’s younger brother Ricky as he talks to a shrink about the events of part 1. The first 40 minutes is all scenes from part 1 with narration.

Unfortunately they leave out the punching-out-Santa scene, otherwise I’d recommend just skipping straight to part 2. The only advantage to watching them both is being able to spot weird continuity changes. For example: near the end of part 1 the police try to gun down the killer Santa in front of the orphanage, but they find that they killed the wrong Santa – it was Father O’Brien, dressing up as Santa to bring gifts to the children.

Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2In part 2 they replay this same scene of the police shooting the Santa that they think is Billy. Then Ricky says “Just one problem… it wasn’t Billy. It was old man Kelsey, the janitor.”

I don’t want to insult the handicapped but there is no other way to describe it – this is an absolutely retarded movie. This movie drools and smells like piss and says weird things to you on the bus and you just smile and try to be nice to it. It is the movie equivalent of one of those cheating episodes of tv shows where they just show a bunch of clips from previous episodes. It’s lazy and it doesn’t make sense because Ricky was only there for a couple of the scenes he flashes back to, and in one of them he was a baby.

When Ricky finally strangles the shrink and goes on an overacting rampage, he actually goes into a movie theater and watches Silent Night Deadly Night Part 1 – including a scene he already flashed back to as the traumatizing event that drove him insane before he could even pee in a toilet. This may sound postmodern or Fellini-esque or something the way I describe it but that’s just because I’m a great Writer. In the movie, it’s just retarded.

In one scene Ricky sees a woman being felt up against her will, so he runs the date-rapist over with a truck and kills him. And the girl thanks him.

His luck with women doesn’t continue, though. He really upsets his girlfriend when he hooks a car battery up to her ex-boyfriend’s tongue and makes his eyes explode. In the orphange they never taught him how to work through differences in a mature relationship. So he just strangles her with a car antenna.

The guy who plays Ricky gives one of the worst acting performances I’ve ever seen. Usually, I like bad acting. I mean who cares. Good acting is overrated. “Look at me, I’m naturalistic.” Whoopty doo. But this guy, trying to look crazy, is an embarrassment.

I highly recommend this piece of idiotic garbage. I will probaly be watching the rest of the series, especially the one directed by Monte Hellman.

VERN has been reviewing movies since 1999 and is the author of the books SEAGALOGY: A STUDY OF THE ASS-KICKING FILMS OF STEVEN SEAGAL, YIPPEE KI-YAY MOVIEGOER!: WRITINGS ON BRUCE WILLIS, BADASS CINEMA AND OTHER IMPORTANT TOPICS and NIKETOWN: A NOVEL. His horror-action novel WORM ON A HOOK will arrive later this year.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 1st, 2002 at 6:33 am and is filed under Horror, Reviews, Thriller. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Silent Night, Deadly Night and Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2”

  1. Don´t be so hard on Eric Freeman, at least his performance is memorable…

  2. I’d like to note that the Santa-punching IS indeed reiterated in SILENT NIGHT DEADLY NIGHT 2, contrary to what Vern stipulates in this review.

    I also find it interesting that the first movie created such an uproar at the time. Wikipedia (incorrectly) says that Siskel and Ebert read the through the list of people who made the movie and said “shame, shame” after each one. If you dig up their AT THE MOVIES review on UTUBE, this is a gross exaggeration that makes it sound like they’re being way more arch and theatrical about it than they were. (Siskel says “Shame on you” to the production company I believe, and later lists the people involved in the movie and says some variation of “you guys suck” at the end of the list).

    But still, I see no other explanation other than that Siskel and Ebert were paid off by the production company to give the film some reverse-psychology advertisement, because the film barely registers in the annals of fucked-up or disturbing films. I mean Siskel actually compares it to I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE. Dude, really? There’s no way S&E survived the 70’s and then were still upset by SILENT NIGHT, DEADLY NIGHT, is there?

  3. This talk of 40 minutes of flashbacks is hype. They keep cutting to that psychiatrist so it’s no more than 35 minutes of clips from SNDN1.

    Enjoyed this quite a bit. Watched both for the first time ever today. 2 is pretty amazing. The second half is crazier than the first movie and you get all the greatest hits, which happens to include all the nudity as well as kills. I’m gonna listen to the audio commentary on this. I hope it rocks.

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <img src=""> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <b> <i> <strike> <em> <strong>