“I’m Paul Barlow, and this is my daughter Jo.”

“Malone.”

“You got a first name?”

“Yeah.”

Livid

tn_lividLIVID is from the writer-directors Alexandre Bustillo and Julien Maury, who did INSIDE, an incredibly intense movie even before it turns envelope-pushing brutal. That was one of those rare movies that actually made my heart beat faster. So I looked forward to seeing their next movie… and then the Weinsteins brought it. “We are thrilled to be back in business with Julien and Alex and couldn’t be more excited to help bring their frightening vision to fans everywhere,” said Bob Weinstein in a press release. I bet they actually could’ve been more excited, because that was 2011 and they still haven’t brought their frightening vision to fans anywhere. I think they’re considering an American remake. While they ponder maybe doing that some day for some reason the team went on to do another one called AMONG THE LIVING and a segment of THE ABCS OF DEATH 2 and an upcoming Texas Chain Saw prequel called LEATHERFACE that will hopefully be better than it sounds. Meanwhile, four-years-old LIVID sits on the Weinstein’s Fuck You, It’s Ours trophy shelf. So I gave up waiting and rented the old region 2 DVD from France.

This is the story of Lucie (Chloe Coulloud) on her first day as a trainee helping Mrs. Wilson (Catherine Jacob) on her rounds taking care of elderly people, checking up on them, giving them their meds and stuff. Lucie, who kinda reminds me of Scarlett Johansson when she was a little younger, impresses Mrs. Wilson by taking to it well, even knowing how to administer shots.

One of the houses they visit is this big dino-damaged mansion that’s legendary and mysterious among the locals, so she’s excited to see it on the inside. It kinda seems inspired by GREY GARDENS, because it’s this elaborate building allowed to fall into disrepair by its eccentric, elderly owner. But in this one she’s a famous ballet dancer named Mrs. Jessel (Marie-Claude Pietragalla, a real dancer), now a vegetable, but set to live out her goldenish years on the property.

This story does take place on Halloween (a nice companion piece to INSIDE’s Christmas setting), but I don’t think that’s an Immortan Joe costume, that’s just how she looks.

still_livid
I guess because it’s France there’s very little Halloween imagery, but there is one weird scene where the protagonists are in a car and come across three trick-or-treaters in HALLOWEEN III masks:

still_livid2
And in case you can’t believe your eyes one of the older people starts singing the Silver Shamrock song. Who would’ve thought that some day there would be loving homages to HALLOWEEN III: THE ONE WITHOUT MICHAEL MYERS?

Here’s the hook: there’s supposedly treasure in the house somewhere. So when Lucie’s shitbag ex-car thief boyfriend (Felix Moati) hears about the old lady he bullies Lucie and his younger brother Ben (Jeremy Kapone) into breaking in at night. He doesn’t want to be a fisherman for life and she has money problems too and she gives in to the fucker. Next thing you know they’re sneaking around with flashlights and taking the key off the old lady’s necklace and hearing weird noises and finding themselves lost in other planes of reality and getting munched on by monster ballerinas.

mp_lividWhen they’re searching the house one of them throws aside scissors, and it seems like an INSIDE in-joke. But it turns out to be set-up for a later stabbing. Good trick.

It takes a while to get to the more interesting parts. But the mansion does have some strange stuff in it, most notably taxidermied creatures with animatronic movements. Lucie ends up sitting with a tea party of dead animal heads on doll bodies that jerkily move every once in a while. You don’t see that every day.

I’m gonna give away some of the mystery now, so beware. At the middle mark we start seeing flashbacks to when Mrs. Jessel was younger, giving private ballet lessons to little girls, and one of her students is leaving and runs into a mischievous pre-teen dancer who bites her. It seems the teacher and her daughter Anna (Chloe Marcq) are some type of vampires. Maybe things aren’t what they seem around here, and maybe they shouldn’t be messed with.

There’s definitely a Guillermo del Toro vibe to some of this: old timey objects, clockwork, magickal shit and dark fairy tales. In the weirdest moment WEIRDNESS SPOILER two characters have their necks slit open, weird pupae inserted into the wounds and then moths fly out of their mouths and into each other’s mouths, and this seems to be some kind of soul transference process, causing a body switch. The guys who wrote that Jason Bateman/Ryan Reynolds comedy CHANGE UP, whose creative labors brought them to “they accidentally wish for each other’s lives while peeing in a fountain together” will see this and think “god damn it, why didn’t we think of the moth thing?”

It turns sweet and beautifully tragic at the end, and that is not what I expected from the INSIDErs. I don’t like it nearly as much as INSIDE, but I like that it’s something totally different.

The aftermath is revealed under the opening credits, though it’s easy to forget about by the end. Or at least I did. But when I went back to make some screen grabs I remembered the rotting body on the beach. And a moth flies out of her mouth.

VERN has been reviewing movies since 1999 and is the author of the books SEAGALOGY: A STUDY OF THE ASS-KICKING FILMS OF STEVEN SEAGAL, YIPPEE KI-YAY MOVIEGOER!: WRITINGS ON BRUCE WILLIS, BADASS CINEMA AND OTHER IMPORTANT TOPICS and NIKETOWN: A NOVEL. His horror-action novel WORM ON A HOOK will arrive later this year.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 27th, 2016 at 11:51 am and is filed under Horror, Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

9 Responses to “Livid”

  1. I’ve been wanting to see this since I first heard about it being the follow up to Inside… can’t believe it isn’t out yet.

  2. The Original Paul

    January 27th, 2016 at 2:16 pm

    I still have INSIDE on my “to-watch” DVD shelf. Must remedy that soon.

  3. I really liked that totally different vibe they put in there. Kinda reminded me of Suspiria…with a touch of the Del Toro imaginations. If you go in there expecting another Scissors Gore Fest you sure will be dissapointed. It´s totally the other way around. But you gotta respect that.
    They just didn´t want to go with the (blood) flow…

  4. Honestly, I thought INSIDE was a terrible, poorly made movie that relied on an “edgy” premise for easy shock value, and I’ve long been baffled as to its popularity among some horror fans. Is there anything about this one that would turn me around on these guys?

  5. @Dan Prestwitch:
    You can´t compaire these two movies. LIVID is totally different. Respect to the Bustillo Bros.
    They could have taken the easy way by feeding on the goreguys with their second movie.
    In LIVID the blood level is nearly at a zero point. It´s a moody gothic kind of feeling in this.
    If you dig stuff like Argento´s SUSPIRIA you really should give the LIVID a try.
    It could be a game changer in the Bustillo Bros. case for you.

  6. Thanks Bartel. That actually does pique my interest more.

  7. Livide would be a great name for a subversively antiheroic master criminal from a French comic book.

    I thought INSIDE was one of the few times when the French propensity for taking everything too far in the name of rubbing what they perceive as the audience’s bourgeois values in their faces produced something of actual fun. I’ll definitely check this one out at the nearest opportunity.

  8. a brilliant film. combines a tim-burton-esque “dark fairytale” vibe with the plot construction of we craven’s “people under the stairs”. much better than “inside” too. its definitely top 5 “new wave of french horror” for me, maybe even top 3.

  9. So the monster ballerina in Cabin in the Woods is a reference to this film, I take it?

Leave a Reply





XHTML: You can use: <a href="" title=""> <img src=""> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <b> <i> <strike> <em> <strong>